Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
But the soul that eateth of the flesh of the sacrifice of peace offerings, that pertain unto the LORD, having his uncleanness upon him, even that soul shall be cut off from his people.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
But the soul H5315 that eateth H398 of the flesh H1320 of the sacrifice H2077 of peace offerings H8002, that pertain unto the LORD H3068, having his uncleanness H2932 upon him, even that soul H5315 shall be cut off H3772 from his people H5971.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
but a person in a state of uncleanness who eats any meat from the sacrifice of peace offerings made to ADONAI will be cut off from his people.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
But if anyone who is unclean eats meat from the peace offering that belongs to the LORD, that person must be cut off from his people.
Ask
American Standard Version
but the soul that eateth of the flesh of the sacrifice of peace-offerings, that pertain unto Jehovah, having his uncleanness upon him, that soul shall be cut off from his people.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
but the soul who eats of the flesh of the sacrifice of peace offerings, that belongs to the LORD, having his uncleanness on him, that soul shall be cut off from his people.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
But if any eate of the flesh of the peace offerings that pertaineth to the Lord, hauing his vncleannesse vpon him, euen the same person shalbe cut off from his people.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and the person who eateth of the flesh of the sacrifice of the peace-offerings which are Jehovah's, and his uncleanness upon him, even that person hath been cut off from his people.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Leviticus 7:20 details a severe prohibition within the Mosaic Law concerning the peace offering. It mandates that any individual who partakes of the sacred flesh of a peace offering while in a state of ritual uncleanness will be "cut off from his people." This regulation underscores the absolute holiness of God, the meticulous demands for ritual purity in approaching Him, and the grave consequences of defiling sacred acts or objects. The peace offering, symbolizing fellowship and communion with the Lord, required a pure participant to maintain the integrity of the covenant relationship and the sanctity of divine worship.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Leviticus 7:20 is situated within the broader instructions concerning the various offerings presented to the Lord, specifically following the detailed regulations for the peace offering in Leviticus 7:11-21. Chapters 1-7 of Leviticus meticulously outline the procedures for the burnt, grain, peace, sin, and guilt offerings, establishing the foundational sacrificial system of Israel. While earlier chapters focus on how the offerings are to be prepared and presented to God (e.g., Leviticus 3), chapter 7 shifts focus to the proper handling and consumption of the portions designated for the priests and the offerers. Verse 20, along with verses 19 and 21, specifically addresses the conditions under which the flesh of the peace offering may or may not be eaten, emphasizing the critical role of ritual purity in partaking of what is holy to the Lord. It serves as a strict warning, reinforcing the sanctity of the offering and the divine presence it represents within the covenant community.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Ancient Israelite society, centered around the Tabernacle, operated under a complex system of ritual purity and impurity. This system was not merely about hygiene but served as a profound theological framework, symbolizing the separation between a holy God and a sinful people, and the necessary conditions for drawing near to Him. Uncleanness (Hebrew: tum'ah) could arise from various sources, including contact with a dead body, certain skin diseases, or bodily discharges, as detailed in Leviticus 11-15. A person in a state of ritual uncleanness was temporarily separated from the community's worship and sacred activities. The peace offering was unique among the sacrifices in that a portion was returned to the offerer and priests to be eaten, signifying a communal meal of fellowship with God. Therefore, participating in such a sacred meal while ritually unclean was a direct affront to God's holiness and a defilement of the covenant relationship, meriting the severe penalty of being "cut off from his people." This penalty underscored the gravity of violating divine ordinances and maintaining the sanctity of the Tabernacle and its worship.
  • Key Themes: Leviticus 7:20 contributes significantly to several overarching themes within the book of Leviticus and the broader Pentateuch. Foremost is the theme of God's Absolute Holiness, which permeates the entire book, declaring that the Lord is distinct and set apart from all impurity, demanding a corresponding holiness from His people (Leviticus 11:44-45). This leads directly to the theme of Purity and Impurity, where ritual cleanliness is essential for maintaining fellowship with God and participating in His worship. The verse also highlights the Covenant Relationship between God and Israel, emphasizing that adherence to divine stipulations, including those concerning purity, was foundational to the covenant's integrity. The severe consequence of being "cut off" underscores the theme of Consequences of Disobedience, illustrating that violations of sacred law carried profound penalties, impacting one's standing within the community and before God. Finally, the verse, in its context of the peace offering, touches upon the theme of Fellowship with God, demonstrating that while God desires communion with His people, it must occur on His terms of holiness and purity.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Soul (Hebrew, nephesh, H5315): In this context, "soul" refers not merely to the inner spiritual essence but to the entire person, the individual self, encompassing their life, being, and personal responsibility. The use of nephesh (H5315) here highlights that the individual, in their entirety, is culpable for transgressing the divine command, indicating that the consequence affects their very existence within the covenant community and their relationship with God. It signifies the whole living person.
  • Uncleanness (Hebrew, ṭumʼâh, H2932): This term denotes a state of ritual impurity, rendering a person unfit to participate in sacred activities or enter holy spaces. It is distinct from moral sin, though it often served as a symbolic representation of the defilement that sin brings. Being in a state of ṭumʼâh (H2932) meant a temporary, often involuntary, separation from the community's access to God, requiring specific purification rituals before one could again approach the holy. This impurity was contagious and could defile sacred objects or other people.
  • Cut off (Hebrew, kârath, H3772): This verb literally means "to cut off," "to cut down," or "to destroy." In the context of covenant law, kârath (H3772) signifies a severe penalty, often implying divine judgment. While it could mean excommunication from the community, it frequently carried the connotation of premature death, the termination of one's lineage, or a complete severance from the covenant people by divine hand. It underscores the ultimate seriousness of violating fundamental covenant stipulations, highlighting the loss of covenant benefits and protection.

Verse Breakdown

  • "But the soul that eateth [of] the flesh of the sacrifice of peace offerings": This clause identifies the specific act and the sacred object involved. The "peace offering" (Hebrew: zevach sh'lamim) was unique in that a portion of the sacrificed animal was returned to the offerer and the priests for consumption, symbolizing fellowship and communion with God. The act of "eating" was not merely physical sustenance but a participation in a sacred meal, a tangible expression of relationship with the divine, making the conditions for participation critically important.
  • "that [pertain] unto the LORD": This phrase emphasizes the divine ownership and sacred nature of the offering. The flesh, having been consecrated and presented to God, was holy. To partake of it was to engage with something set apart for the Lord, demanding the utmost reverence and adherence to His prescribed conditions, as it was considered to be "of the Lord" Himself.
  • "having his uncleanness upon him": This is the critical condition that triggers the severe consequence. It refers to a state of ritual impurity, whether from contact with a dead body, a bodily discharge, or another source of tum'ah. The presence of uncleanness rendered the individual unfit to interact with holy things, as it represented a state incompatible with God's perfect holiness, thereby defiling the sacred meal.
  • "even that soul shall be cut off from his people": This final clause pronounces the severe penalty for violating the preceding conditions. "Cut off" signifies a profound and often irreversible separation from the covenant community. This could manifest as excommunication, social ostracization, or, more gravely, divine judgment leading to premature death or the termination of one's family line. It highlights the absolute necessity of ritual purity for maintaining fellowship with God and remaining within the blessings of the covenant, emphasizing the gravity of defiling sacred acts.

Literary Devices

Leviticus 7:20 employs several literary devices to convey its weighty message. The primary device is Legal Language, characterized by its precise, conditional, and prescriptive nature. The verse functions as a clear legal statute, outlining a specific transgression and its corresponding punishment. The use of the phrase "But the soul that eateth... having his uncleanness upon him, even that soul shall be cut off" demonstrates this conditional, cause-and-effect legal structure, typical of covenant stipulations. There is also a subtle use of Repetition, particularly with the word "soul" (Hebrew: nephesh), which appears twice in the verse. This repetition emphasizes the individual's personal responsibility and the direct, personal consequence of their actions, underscoring that the penalty is applied to the very being who transgresses. Furthermore, the verse relies on Symbolism: the peace offering symbolizes communion and fellowship with God, while "uncleanness" symbolizes a state of defilement that breaks that fellowship. The act of eating the holy food while unclean thus symbolically represents a defilement of the sacred relationship itself, leading to the symbolic and literal severing of ties with the covenant community. The stark contrast between the sacredness of the offering and the defilement of the participant amplifies the severity of the transgression.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Leviticus 7:20 powerfully articulates fundamental theological truths about God's holiness, the necessity of purity in approaching Him, and the gravity of disobedience within a covenant relationship. God, being utterly holy, demands that all who draw near to Him, especially in acts of worship and communion, must reflect a state of purity. The ritual laws, while specific to the Old Covenant, served as tangible lessons about the spiritual reality of sin's defilement and the absolute incompatibility of impurity with divine holiness. The severe penalty of being "cut off" underscores that violating these sacred boundaries was not a minor infraction but a profound affront to God's character and a breach of the covenant, threatening one's very existence within the community of faith. This principle transcends mere ritual, pointing to the eternal truth that fellowship with a holy God requires a separation from defilement, ultimately foreshadowing the perfect purity required for true communion with God, which only Christ can provide.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While the specific ritual laws of the Old Testament are no longer binding for believers under the New Covenant, the profound spiritual principles embedded in Leviticus 7:20 remain eternally relevant. This verse challenges us to consider the nature of our approach to God today. It reminds us that God is still holy, and our worship, whether corporate or individual, must be marked by reverence, humility, and a sincere desire for spiritual purity. Just as ritual uncleanness prevented physical participation in sacred meals, unconfessed sin and an unrepentant heart can hinder our spiritual fellowship with God and participation in the "spiritual sacrifices" we offer (1 Peter 2:5). We are called to live lives set apart, recognizing that our cleansing comes not from physical rituals but from the atoning work of Jesus Christ. The warning of being "cut off" serves as a sober reminder that persistent, unrepentant sin can lead to a spiritual separation from God's blessings and fellowship, even if not physical excommunication. We are therefore encouraged to continually examine our hearts, confess our sins, and pursue holiness, ensuring that our communion with God is genuine and undefiled, reflecting the holiness of the One we worship.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the concept of God's absolute holiness, as emphasized in Leviticus 7:20, shape your understanding of worship and personal devotion today?
  • What might "spiritual uncleanness" look like in a believer's life under the New Covenant, and what steps can be taken to address it?
  • In what ways might we, perhaps unintentionally, approach God or sacred things (like prayer, Bible study, or corporate worship) casually, and how can we cultivate a deeper sense of reverence and purity?

FAQ

What was the "peace offering" and why was it different from other sacrifices?

Answer: The peace offering (Hebrew: zevach sh'lamim) was one of the primary sacrifices in ancient Israel, distinct from burnt, sin, or guilt offerings. Its primary purpose was to express fellowship, thanksgiving, or to fulfill a vow. Unlike other offerings where the entire animal (burnt offering) or specific portions (sin/guilt offerings) were given entirely to God or the priests, a significant portion of the peace offering was returned to the offerer and their family to be eaten in a communal meal. This meal symbolized peace, communion, and reconciliation between God and His people, allowing them to "eat with God" in His presence at the Tabernacle. This unique aspect made the rules of purity surrounding its consumption particularly critical, as it involved direct participation in a sacred meal.

What did "cut off from his people" truly mean in the context of Leviticus 7:20?

Answer: The phrase "cut off from his people" (Hebrew: nikhr'tah hanefesh hahi mimmeiha) signifies a severe and ultimate penalty for violating a fundamental covenant law. Its precise meaning has been debated among scholars, but it generally encompasses several possibilities, often implying divine judgment:

  • Excommunication: The individual would be formally expelled from the community, losing their social and religious standing within Israel.
  • Divine Judgment/Premature Death: It could signify that God Himself would intervene to end the person's life, often prematurely, as a direct consequence of their sin.
  • Termination of Lineage: In some contexts, it might imply that the individual would die without heirs, thus cutting off their family line from Israel.
    Regardless of the exact manifestation, it represented a complete severance from the covenant blessings and the protective sphere of God's relationship with His chosen people. For Leviticus 7:20, it underscored the absolute seriousness of defiling God's holiness through improper interaction with sacred objects or rituals, emphasizing the dire consequences of breaching covenant stipulations.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Leviticus 7:20, with its stern warning against approaching the holy while unclean, finds its profound fulfillment and ultimate resolution in Jesus Christ. The peace offering, symbolizing communion and reconciliation, foreshadowed the ultimate peace that Christ would establish between God and humanity. He is our true peace offering, breaking down the wall of hostility and bringing us near to God. The ritual uncleanness that barred access to God's presence and sacred meals pointed to the deeper spiritual uncleanness of sin that separates all humanity from a holy God (Isaiah 59:2). Jesus, as the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, offers not merely ritual cleansing but a complete and eternal purification from all spiritual defilement through His shed blood (Hebrews 9:14). Through faith in Him, we are made righteous and holy, enabling us to draw near to God with confidence, not based on our own ritual purity but on Christ's perfect sacrifice (Hebrews 10:19-22). Our communion with God is now through partaking of His body and blood in the Lord's Supper, a new covenant meal that demands spiritual discernment and a pure heart, lest we eat and drink judgment upon ourselves (1 Corinthians 11:27-29). The severe consequence of being "cut off" from God's people is ultimately averted for those who are "in Christ," as He has borne the full penalty for our sin, ensuring that those who believe in Him will never be "cut off" from His eternal presence and fellowship (John 6:37).

Copy as

Commentary on Leviticus 7 verses 11–34

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

All this relates to the peace-offerings: it is the repetition and explication of what we had before, with various additions.

I. The nature and intention of the peace-offerings are here more distinctly opened. They were offered either, 1. In thankfulness for some special mercy received, such as recovery from sickness, preservation in a journey, deliverance at sea, redemption out of captivity, all which are specified in Ps. 107, and for them men are called upon to offer the sacrifice of thanksgiving, Lev 7:22. Or, 2. In performance of some vow which a man made when he was in distress (Lev 7:16), and this was less honourable than the former, though the omission of it would have been more culpable. Or, 3. In supplication for some special mercy which a man was in the pursuit and expectation of, here called a voluntary offering. This accompanied a man's prayers, as the former did his praises. We do not find that men were bound by the law, unless they had bound themselves by vow, to offer these peace-offerings upon such occasions, as they were to bring their sacrifices of atonement in case of sin committed. Not but that prayer and praise are as much our duty as repentance is; but here, in the expressions of their sense of mercy, God left them more to their liberty than in the expressions of their sense of sin - to try the generosity of their devotion, and that their sacrifices, being free-will offerings, might be the more laudable and acceptable; and, by obliging them to bring the sacrifices of atonement, God would show the necessity of the great propitiation.

II. The rites and ceremonies about the peace-offerings are enlarged upon.

1.If the peace-offering was offered for a thanksgiving, a meat-offering must be offered with it, cakes of several sorts, and wafers (Lev 7:12), and (which was peculiar to the peace-offerings) leavened bread must be offered, not to be burnt upon the altar, that was forbidden (Lev 2:11), but to be eaten with the flesh of the sacrifice, that nothing might be wanting to make it a complete and pleasant feast; for unleavened bread was less grateful to the taste, and therefore, though enjoined in the passover for a particular reason, yet in other festivals leavened bread, which was lighter and more pleasant, was appointed, that men might feast at God's table as well as at their own. And some think that a meat-offering is required to be brought with every peace-offering, as well as with that of thanksgiving, by that law (Lev 7:29) which requires an oblation with it, that the table might be as well furnished as the altar.

2.The flesh of the peace-offerings, both that which was the priest's share and that which was the offerer's must be eaten quickly, and not kept long, either raw, or dressed, cold. If it was a peace-offering for thanksgiving, it must be all eaten the same day (Lev 7:16); if a vow, or voluntary offering, it must be eaten either the same day or the day after, Lev 7:16. If any was left beyond the time limited, it was to be burnt (Lev 7:17); and, if any person ate of what was so left their conduct should be animadverted upon as a very high misdemeanour, Lev 7:18. Though they were not obliged to eat it in the holy place, as those offerings that are called most holy, but might take it to their own tents and feast upon it there, yet God would by this law make them to know a difference between that and other meat, and religiously to observe it, that whereas they might keep other meat cold in the house as long as they thought fit, and warm it again if they pleased, and eat it three or four days after, they might not do so with the flesh of their peace-offerings, but it must be eaten immediately. (1.) Because God would not have that holy flesh to be in danger of putrefying, or being fly-blown, to prevent which it must be salted with fire (as the expression is, Mar 9:49) if it were kept; as, if it was used, it must be salted with salt. (2.) Because God would not have his people to be niggardly and sparing, and distrustful of providence, but cheerfully to enjoy what God gives them (Ecc 8:15), and to do good with it, and not to be anxiously solicitous for the morrow. (3.) The flesh of the peace-offerings was God's treat, and therefore God would have the disposal of it; and he orders it to be used generously for the entertainment of their friends, and charitably for the relief of the poor, to show that he is a bountiful benefactor, giving us all things richly to enjoy, the bread of the day in its day. If the sacrifice was thanksgiving, they were especially obliged thus to testify their holy joy in God's goodness by their holy feasting. This law is made very strict (Lev 7:18), that if the offerer did not take care to have all his offering eaten by himself or his family, his friends or the poor, within the time limited by the law, or, in the event of any part being left, to burn it (which was the most decent way of disposing of it, the sacrifices upon the altar being consumed by fire), then his offering should not be accepted, nor imputed to him. Note, All the benefit of our religious services is lost if we do not improve them, and conduct ourselves aright afterwards. They are not acceptable to God if they have not a due influence upon ourselves. If a man seemed generous in bringing a peace-offering, and yet afterwards proved sneaking and paltry in the using of it, it was as if he had never brought it; nay, it shall be an abomination. Note, There is no mean between God's acceptance and his abhorrence. If our persons and performances are sincere and upright, they are accepted; if not, they are an abomination, Pro 15:8. He that eats it after the time appointed shall bear his iniquity, that is, he shall be cut off from his people, as it is explained (Lev 19:8), where this law is repeated. This law of eating the peace-offerings before the third day, that they might not putrefy, is applicable tot the resurrection of Christ after two days, that, being God's holy one, he might not see corruption, Psa 16:10. And some think that it instructs us speedily, and without delay, to partake of Christ and his grace, feeding and feasting thereon by faith today, while it is called today (Heb 3:13, Heb 3:14), for it will be too late shortly.

3.But the flesh, and those that eat it, must be pure. (1.) The flesh must touch no unclean thing; if it did, it must not be eaten, but burnt, Lev 7:19. If, in carrying it from the altar to the place where it was eaten, a dog touched it, or it touched a dead body or any other unclean thing, it was then unfit to be used in a religious feast. Every thing we honour the holy God with must be pure and carefully kept from all pollution. It is a case adjudged (Hag 2:12) that the holy flesh could not by its touch communicate holiness to what was common; but by this law it is determined that by the touch of that which was unclean it received pollution from it, which intimates that the infection of sin is more easily and more frequently communicated than the savour of grace. (2.) It must not be eaten by any unclean person. When a person was upon any account ceremonially unclean it was at his peril if he presumed to eat of the flesh of the peace-offerings, Lev 7:20, Lev 7:21. Holy things are only for holy persons; the holiness of the food being ceremonial, those were incapacitated to partake of it who lay under any ceremonial uncleanness; but we are hereby taught to preserve ourselves pure from all the pollutions of sin, that we may have the benefit and comfort of Christ's sacrifice, Pe1 2:1, Pe1 2:2. Our consciences must be purged from dead works, that we may be fit to serve the living God, Heb 9:14. But if any dare to partake of the table of the Lord under the pollution of sin unrepented of, and so profane sacred things, they eat and drink judgment to themselves, as those did that ate of the peace-offerings (Lev 7:20) and again (Lev 7:21), that they pertain unto the Lord: whatever pertains to the Lord is sacred, and must be used with great reverence and not with unhallowed hands. "Be you holy, for God is holy, and you pertain to him."

4.The eating of blood and the fat of the inwards is here again prohibited; and the prohibition is annexed as before to the law of the peace-offerings, Lev 3:17. (1.) The prohibition of the fat seems to be confined to those beasts which were used for sacrifice, the bullocks, sheep, and goats: but of the roe-buck, the hart, and other clean beasts, they might eat the fat; for those only of which offerings were brought are mentioned here, Lev 7:23-25. This was to preserve in their minds a reverence for God's altar, on which the fat of the inwards was burnt. The Jews say, "If a man eat so much as an olive of forbidden fat - if he do it presumptuously, he is in danger of being cut off by the hand of God - if ignorantly, he is to bring a sin-offering, and so to pay dearly for his carelessness." To eat of the flesh of that which died of itself, or was torn of beasts, was unlawful; but to eat of the fat of such was doubly unlawful, Lev 7:24. (2.) The prohibition of blood is more general (Lev 7:26, Lev 7:27), because the fat was offered to God only by way of acknowledgment, but the blood made atonement for the soul, and so typified Christ's sacrifice much more than the burning of the fat did; to this therefore a greater reverence must be paid, till these types had their accomplishment in the offering up of the body of Christ once for all. The Jews rightly expound this law as forbidding only the blood of the life, as they express it, not that which we call the gravy, for of that they supposed it was lawful to eat.

5.The priest's share of the peace-offerings is here prescribed. Out of every beast that was offered for a peace-offering the priest that offered it was to have to himself the breast and the right shoulder, Lev 7:30-34. Observe here, (1.) That when the sacrifice was killed the offerer himself must, with his own hands, present God's part of it, that he might signify thereby his cheerfully giving it up to God, and his desire that it might be accepted. He was with his own hands to lift it up, in token of his regard to God as the God of heaven, and then to wave it to and fro, in token of his regard to God as the Lord of the whole earth, to whom thus, as far as he could reach, he offered it, showing his readiness and wish to do him honour. Now that which was thus heaved and waved was the fat, and the breast, and the right shoulder, it was all offered to God; and then he ordered the fat to his altar, and the breast and shoulder to his priest, both being his receivers. (2.) That when the fat was burnt the priest took his part, on which he and his family were to feast, as well as the offerer and his family. In holy joy and thanksgiving, it is good to have our ministers to go before us, and to be our mouth to God. The melody is sweet when he that sows and those that reap rejoice together. Some observe a significancy in the parts assigned to the priests: the breast and the shoulder intimate the affections and the actions, which must be devoted to the honour of God by all his people and to the service also of the church by all his priests. Christ, our great peace-offering, feasts all his spiritual priests with the breast and shoulder, with the dearest love and the sweetest and strongest supports; for his is the wisdom of God and the power of God. When Saul was designed for a king Samuel ordered the shoulder of the peace-offering to be set before him (Sa1 9:24), which gave him a hint of something great and sacred intended for him. Jesus Christ is our great peace-offering; for he made himself a sacrifice, not only to atone for sin, and so to save us from the curse, but to purchase a blessing for us, and all good. By our joyfully partaking of the benefits of redemption we feast upon the sacrifice, to signify which the Lord's supper was instituted.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 11–34. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Leviticus 7:20 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.