Study This Verse
Commentary on Leviticus 7 verses 1–10
Observe here, 1. Concerning the trespass-offering, that, being much of the same nature with the sin-offering, it was to be governed by the same rules, Lev 7:6. When the blood and fat were offered to God to make atonement, the priests were to eat the flesh, as that of the sin-offering, in the holy place. The Jews have a tradition (as we have it from the learned bishop Patrick) concerning the sprinkling of the blood of the trespass-offering round about upon the altar, "That there was a scarlet line which went round about the altar exactly in the middle, and the blood of the burnt-offerings was sprinkled round about above the line, but that of the trespass-offerings and peace-offerings round about below the line." As to the flesh of the trespass-offering, the right to it belonged to the priest that offered it, Lev 7:7. He that did the work must have the wages. This was an encouragement to the priests to give diligent attendance on the altar; the more ready and busy they were the more they got. Note, The more diligent we are in the services of religion the more we shall reap of the advantages of it. But any of the priests, and the males of their families, might be invited by him to whom it belonged to partake with him: Every male among the priests shall eat thereof, that is, may eat thereof, in the holy place, Lev 7:6. And, no doubt, it was the usage to treat one another with those perquisites of their office, by which friendship and fellowship were kept up among the priests. Freely they had received, and must freely give. It seems the offerer was not himself to have any share of his trespass-offering, as he was to have of his peace-offering; but it was all divided between the altar and the priest. They offered peace-offerings in thankfulness for mercy, and then it was proper to feast; but they offered trespass-offerings in sorrow for sin, and then fasting was more proper, in token of holy mourning, and a resolution to abstain from sin. 2. Concerning the burnt-offering it is here appointed that the priest that offered it should have the skin (Lev 7:8), which no doubt he might make money of. "This" (the Jews say) "is meant only for the burnt-offerings which were offered by particular persons; for the profit of the skins of the daily burnt-offerings for the congregation went to the repair of the sanctuary." Some suggest that this appointment will help us to understand God's clothing our first parents with coats of skins, Gen 3:21. It is probable that the beasts whose skins they were were offered in sacrifice as whole burnt-offerings, and that Adam was the priest that offered them; and then God gave him the skins, as his fee, to make clothes of for himself and his wife, in remembrance of which the skins ever after pertained to the priest; and see Gen 27:16. 3. Concerning the meat-offering, if it was dressed, it was fit to be eaten immediately; and therefore the priest that offered it was to have it, Lev 7:9. If it was dry, there was not so much occasion for being in haste to use it; and therefore an equal dividend of it must be made among all the priests that were then in waiting, Lev 7:10.
Trespass: Trespasses, for which these offerings were to be made, were lesser offences than those for which the sin offerings were appointed.
Continue studying Leviticus 7:1 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Leviticus 7:1 introduces the specific regulations for the trespass offering, also known as the guilt offering, immediately highlighting its profound sacredness by declaring it "most holy." This verse serves as a crucial transition within the detailed instructions regarding the various sacrificial rituals, emphasizing the meticulous divine provision for addressing specific offenses that incurred guilt, often involving restitution, and underscoring the offering's unique and elevated status within Israel's covenant relationship with God.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
Leviticus 7:1 employs several literary devices to convey its message with precision and emphasis. The phrase "Likewise this is the law of..." functions as a Formulaic Introduction, a recurring legislative pattern throughout Leviticus that signals the beginning of specific legal codes. This repetitive structure emphasizes the divine authority and meticulous nature of the covenant laws. The declaration "it is most holy" serves as a powerful instance of Emphasis and Hyperlative, using a superlative (the Hebrew "holy of holies") to underscore the supreme sacredness of the trespass offering. This elevated status is not merely descriptive but prescriptive, dictating the stringent handling and consumption rules for the sacrifice. Furthermore, the verse acts as a Transition, bridging the general discussion of offerings with specific priestly directives, ensuring continuity and clarity in the sacrificial system while highlighting the unique importance of the trespass offering.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Leviticus 7:1 powerfully communicates the seriousness of sin, especially those transgressions that involve specific harm or a breach of trust, and God's meticulous provision for atonement and reconciliation. The "most holy" status of the trespass offering underscores that even specific acts of wrongdoing, particularly those requiring restitution, necessitate a sacred act of divine intervention for cleansing and restoration. This highlights God's demand for both spiritual purity and practical justice within His covenant community, demonstrating His holiness and His desire for His people to live in integrity. The offering points to a God who not only forgives but also provides a way to rectify wrongs, emphasizing the holistic nature of His redemptive plan that addresses both vertical (Godward) and horizontal (manward) dimensions of sin.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
Leviticus 7:1, with its declaration of the trespass offering as "most holy," compels us to reflect on the profound seriousness of sin, particularly those actions that cause tangible harm or violate trust. It reminds us that God's holiness is absolute, and any transgression, no matter how seemingly small, carries significant weight in His sight, impacting both our relationship with Him and with others. For us today, while the animal sacrifices are no longer required, the principles embedded in the trespass offering remain profoundly relevant. We are called to acknowledge our own transgressions, not just generally, but specifically, especially when our actions have caused harm to others or violated sacred trusts. This verse encourages us to pursue not only spiritual forgiveness through Christ but also, where appropriate, practical restitution and reconciliation with those we have wronged. It fosters a deep appreciation for the comprehensive nature of Christ's atonement, which addresses both our general sinfulness and the specific guilt we incur, empowering us to live lives marked by integrity, repentance, and restorative justice, reflecting the holiness of the God who has redeemed us.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What is the primary difference between the sin offering and the trespass offering?
Answer: While both the sin offering (Hebrew: chatta't) and the trespass offering (Hebrew: 'asham) dealt with sin and guilt, their primary distinctions lay in the nature of the offense and the required response. The sin offering typically addressed general or unintentional sins, often those that violated a negative command of God (e.g., Leviticus 4:2). It focused on cleansing and purification from ritual impurity or general moral failings. In contrast, the trespass offering (as introduced in Leviticus 7:1) specifically addressed offenses that involved a breach of trust, damage to another person's property or rights, or a desecration of holy things. Crucially, the trespass offering often required not only the sacrifice but also a component of restitution or compensation to the wronged party, plus an additional 20% (e.g., Numbers 5:6-8). It emphasized the restoration of what was lost or violated, highlighting both the spiritual and social dimensions of sin.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The declaration of the trespass offering as "most holy" in Leviticus 7:1 finds its ultimate and perfect fulfillment in Jesus Christ. The Old Testament trespass offering, with its requirements for specific atonement and restitution for offenses against God's holiness or human rights, foreshadowed the comprehensive work of Christ. He is the ultimate "most holy" sacrifice, without blemish or spot, whose life and death perfectly satisfied God's righteous demands for every form of sin and guilt. Just as the trespass offering provided a means for the Israelite to be reconciled for specific wrongs, Christ's atoning work on the cross addresses the entirety of our sin debt—both our general sinfulness and our specific acts of transgression that incur guilt and demand restitution. Isaiah 53:10 prophetically speaks of the Suffering Servant making himself an "offering for guilt," directly linking the Messiah to the 'asham. Through His perfect sacrifice, Jesus bore the full weight of our trespasses, making us truly "most holy" in God's sight, not by our own merit or animal blood, but by His precious blood (1 Peter 1:18-19). He not only atoned for our guilt but also initiated the ultimate restoration, reconciling us to God and empowering us to live lives marked by true righteousness and justice, reflecting the very holiness of God (2 Corinthians 5:21 and Romans 5:1-2).