TRV
- English
- King James KJV
- Complete Jewish CJB
- World English WEBM
- Berean Standard BSB
- American Standard ASV
- Geneva GNV
- Young's Literal YLT
- Douay-Rheims DRC
- International
- Shqip ALB
- العربية SVD
- বাংলা BN-IRV
- မြန်မာ Judson
- 简体文 CUV-S
- 繁體中文 CUV-T
- Čeština BKR
- Nederlands STVE
- Français LSG
- Deutsch SCH
- Ελληνικά Vamvas
- ગુજરાતી GU-IRV
- Hausa HCB
- עברית Hebrew
- हिन्दी HCV
- Magyar KAROLI
- Bahasa Indonesia INDO-TB
- Italiano Diodati
- 日本語 Kougo
- 한국어 Korean
- മലയാളം MAL
- मराठी MRCV
- Norsk DNB
- فارسی OPV
- Polski BG
- Português Almeida
- Română Cornilescu
- Русский Synodal
- Español RVG
- Kiswahili Neno
- Svenska SV1917
- Tagalog TAG-ADB
- தமிழ் TCV
- తెలుగు TSA
- ภาษาไทย THAI-KJV
- Українська Ohienko
- Tiếng Việt CADMAN
- Yorùbá YCB
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Leviticus 25:39–55. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
We have here the laws concerning servitude, designed to preserve the honour of the Jewish nation as a free people, and rescued by a divine power out of the house of bondage, into the glorious liberty of God's sons, his first-born. Now the law is,
I.That a native Israelite should never be made a bondman for perpetuity.
If he was sold for debt, or for a crime, by the house of judgment, he was to serve but six years, and to go out the seventh; this was appointed, Exo 21:2. But if he sold himself through extreme poverty, having nothing at all left him to preserve his life, and if it was to one of his own nation that he sold himself, in such a case it is here provided,
1.That he should not serve as a bond-servant (Lev 25:39), nor be sold with the sale of a bondman (Lev 25:42); that is, "it must not be looked upon that his master that bought him had as absolute a property in him as in a captive taken in war, that might be used, sold, and bequeathed, at pleasure, as much as a man's cattle; no, he shall serve thee as a hired servant, whom the master has the use of only, but not a despotic power over." And the reason is, They are my servants, Lev 25:42. God does not make his servants slaves, and therefore their brethren must not. God had redeemed them out of Egypt, and therefore they must never be exposed to sale as bondmen. The apostle applies this spiritually (Co1 7:23), You are bought with a price, be not the servants of men, that is, "of the lusts of men, no, nor of your own lusts;" for, having become the servants of God, we must not let sin reign in our mortal bodies, Rom 6:12, Rom 6:22.
2.That while he did serve he should not be ruled with rigour, as the Israelites were in Egypt, Lev 25:43. Both his work and his usage must be such as were fitting for a son of Abraham. Masters are still required to give to their servants that which is just and equal, Col 4:1. They may be used, but must not be abused. Those masters that are always hectoring and domineering over their servants, taunting them and trampling upon them, that are unreasonable in exacting work and giving rebukes, and that rule them with a high hand, forget that their Master is in heaven; and what will they do when he rises up? as holy Job reasons with himself, Job 31:13, Job 31:14.
3.That at the year of jubilee he should go out free, he and his children, and should return to his own family, Lev 25:41. This typified our redemption from the service of sin and Satan by the grace of God in Christ, whose truth makes us free, Joh 7:32. The Jewish writers say that, for ten days before the jubilee-trumpet sounded, the servants that were to be discharged by it did express their great joy by feasting, and wearing garlands on their heads: it is therefore called the joyful sound, Psa 89:15. And we are thus to rejoice in the liberty we have by Christ.
II.That they might purchase bondmen of the heathen nations that were round about them, or of those strangers that sojourned among them (except of those seven nations that were to be destroyed); and might claim a dominion over them, and entail them upon their families as an inheritance, for the year of jubilee should give no discharge to them, Lev 25:44, Lev 25:46. Thus in our English plantations the negroes only are used as slaves; how much to the credit of Christianity I shall not say. Now,
1.This authority which they had over the bondmen whom they purchased from the neighbouring nations was in pursuance of the blessing of Jacob, Gen 27:29, Let people serve thee.
2.It prefigured the bringing in of the Gentiles to the service of Christ and his church. Ask of me, and I will give thee the heathen for thy inheritance, Psa 2:8. And it is promised (Isa 61:5), Strangers shall stand and feed your flocks, and the sons of the alien shall be your vine-dressers; see Rev 2:26, Rev 2:27. The upright shall have the dominion in the morning, Psa 49:14.
3.It intimates that none shall have the benefit of the gospel jubilee but those only that are Israelites indeed, and the children of Abraham by faith: as for those that continue heathenish, they continue bondmen. See this turned upon the unbelieving Jews themselves, Gal 4:25, where Jerusalem, when she had rejected Christ, is said to be in bondage with her children. Let me only add here that, though they are not forbidden to rule their bondmen with rigour, yet the Jewish doctors say, "It is the property of mercy, and way of wisdom, that a man should be compassionate, and not make his yoke heavy upon any servant that he has."
III.That if an Israelite sold himself for a servant to a wealthy proselyte that sojourned among them care should be taken that he should have the same advantages as if he had sold himself to an Israelite, and in some respects greater.
1.That he should not serve as a bondman, but as a hired servant, and not to be ruled with rigour (Lev 25:53), in thy sight, which intimated that the Jewish magistrates should particularly have an eye to him, and, if he were abused, should take cognizance of it, and redress his grievances, though the injured servant did not himself complain. Also he was to go free at the year of jubilee, Lev 25:54. Though the sons of strangers might serve them for ever, yet the sons of Israel might not serve strangers for ever; yet the servant here, having made himself a slave by his own act and deed, should not go out in the seventh year of release, but in the jubilee only.
2.That he should have this further advantage that he might be redeemed again before the year of jubilee, Lev 25:48, Lev 25:49. He that had sold himself to an Israelite might, if ever he was able, redeem himself, but his relations had no right to redeem him. "But if a man sold himself to a stranger," the Jews say, "his relations were urged to redeem him; if they did not, it was fit that he should be redeemed at the public charge," which we find done, Neh 5:8. The price of his ransom was to be computed according to the prospect of the year of jubilee (Lev 25:50-52), as in the redemption of land, Lev 25:15, Lev 25:16. The learned bishop Patrick quotes one of the Jewish rabbin for an evangelical exposition of that appointment (Lev 25:48), One of his brethren shall redeem him. "This Redeemer," says the rabbi, "is the Messiah, the Son of David." They expected this Messiah to be their Redeemer out of their captivity, and to restore them to their own land again; but we welcome him as the Redeemer who shall come to Zion, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob, for he shall save his people from their sins; and under this notion there were those that looked for redemption in Jerusalem.
Continue studying Leviticus 25:43 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Leviticus 25:43 delivers a profound ethical mandate within the covenantal framework, specifically addressing the treatment of fellow Israelites who, due to economic hardship, entered temporary servitude. It unequivocally prohibits ruling over such individuals with harshness or oppression, instead demanding a compassionate and just approach rooted in a reverential fear of God. This verse encapsulates the divine expectation that Israel, having themselves been delivered from rigorous bondage, would reflect God's character of mercy and equity in their internal social structures, recognizing His ultimate ownership over all people and fostering a society built on dignity rather than exploitation.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is intricately woven into the fabric of Leviticus chapter 25, a foundational section outlining the unique socio-economic laws of the Sabbatical Year (every seventh year) and the Jubilee Year (every fiftieth year). These regulations were divinely instituted to prevent the permanent accumulation of wealth and land, ensure the periodic redistribution of resources, and provide a mechanism for the redemption of land and the liberation of those who had sold themselves into servitude. The preceding verses, specifically Leviticus 25:39-42, meticulously define the conditions under which an Israelite might enter into temporary service to a fellow Israelite, clarifying that this was not chattel slavery but a debt-based indentured arrangement with a guaranteed path to freedom at the Jubilee. The explicit prohibition against ruling "with rigour" in Leviticus 25:43 directly applies to these covenantal bondservants, underscoring their continued status as fellow members of God's chosen people, distinct from foreign slaves or mere property. This placement emphasizes God's concern for justice and human dignity even within necessary economic structures.
Historical & Cultural Context
Ancient Near Eastern societies widely practiced various forms of servitude, ranging from chattel slavery to debt slavery and indentured service, often characterized by severe exploitation. Israel's Mosaic Law, however, presented a radical and counter-cultural paradigm, especially concerning the treatment of fellow Israelites. This distinctive ethical framework was profoundly shaped by Israel's collective memory of their own brutal oppression in Egypt, where they were subjected to "rigorous service" (Exodus 1:13-14). Having been delivered by God from such tyranny, Israel was commanded not to replicate that oppressive system among themselves. The injunction to "fear thy God" serves as a crucial theological anchor, reminding the Israelites that their actions toward the vulnerable were not merely social conventions but acts of obedience to the God who redeemed them and claimed ultimate ownership over them (Leviticus 25:55). This context highlights the unique moral vision of the Mosaic Law, which sought to establish a just and merciful society that profoundly reflected God's own character and redemptive history.
Key Themes
Leviticus 25:43 contributes significantly to several overarching themes within Leviticus and the broader Pentateuch. Central among these is the theme of Holiness and Justice, demonstrating that God's holiness extends beyond ritual purity to encompass ethical conduct in social relations. The verse also reinforces the theme of Redemption and Remembrance, as Israel's past liberation from Egyptian "rigour" serves as the moral foundation for their treatment of others. It powerfully articulates the theme of God's Sovereignty and Ownership, reminding the Israelites that all people ultimately belong to God, thereby establishing an inherent dignity for every individual regardless of their socio-economic status. Furthermore, it highlights the theme of Covenantal Responsibility, where the fear of God is presented not as a mere emotion but as the primary motivator for righteous living and compassionate action within the covenant community. These themes collectively underscore God's desire for a society that mirrors His own just and merciful character.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This verb (רָדָה, H7287) fundamentally means "to tread down" or "to subjugate." While it can denote legitimate dominion (as in Genesis 1:26), in the context of Leviticus 25:43, it carries the negative connotation of oppressive rule, exercising power in a way that is burdensome, exploitative, or demeaning. The prohibition here is against a form of rule that crushes or breaks the spirit of the one being ruled, rather than simply managing their labor.
This noun (פֶּרֶךְ, H6531) derives from an unused root meaning "to break apart" or "fracture." It specifically denotes severity, harshness, cruelty, or oppressive force. Its most potent usage outside of Leviticus 25:43 is found in Exodus 1:13-14, where it describes the brutal and crushing labor imposed on the Israelites by the Egyptians. Its deliberate deployment here serves as a powerful and poignant reminder to the Israelites of their own past suffering and a clear prohibition against inflicting similar cruelty upon their brethren. It signifies not merely hard work, but work that is demeaning, dehumanizing, and excessive, driven by an exploitative spirit rather than a just one.
This primitive root (יָרֵא, H3372) denotes "to fear," but in a moral and theological sense, it means "to revere" or "to stand in awe of." It implies a profound respect, submission to authority, and a deep understanding of God's character, holiness, and sovereignty. This "fear" is not terror but a foundational motivation for ethical conduct, leading to obedience to His commands and a desire to live in a way that honors Him. It transforms mere social ethics into a sacred duty, recognizing that one's treatment of others is ultimately a reflection of one's relationship with God.
Verse Breakdown
"Thou shalt not rule over him with rigour;"
This is a direct, emphatic prohibition against harsh, oppressive, or cruel treatment of a fellow Israelite who has entered into indentured service. The "him" refers specifically to the Israelite bondservant mentioned in the preceding verses, whose servitude was a temporary economic arrangement, not a permanent loss of personhood or dignity. This clause forbids any form of exploitation, excessive demands, or demeaning actions that would strip the individual of their inherent worth or reduce them to mere property. It demands that even in a master-servant relationship, the master must remember the servant's status as a fellow member of God's covenant people, deserving of humane and just treatment, distinct from the brutal practices of surrounding nations.
"but shalt fear thy God."
This second clause provides the divine imperative and the ultimate motivation for the preceding prohibition. The command to "fear thy God" is not an alternative to humane treatment but its very foundation and driving force. It implies that the master's conduct must be governed by a profound reverence for God, recognizing His supreme authority and His ultimate ownership over all Israelites, master and servant alike (Leviticus 25:55). Because God is inherently just and merciful, and because He delivered Israel from rigorous oppression, His people are likewise commanded to embody these attributes in their interactions, particularly with the vulnerable. This phrase elevates the ethical command from a mere social rule to a theological imperative, making the treatment of others an act of worship and obedience to God.
Literary Devices
Leviticus 25:43 employs several powerful literary devices to convey its profound message. Contrast is central, setting the forbidden "rigour" (oppression) against the commanded "fear thy God" (reverence and obedience), thereby highlighting that humane treatment is a direct outflow of a right relationship with the Almighty. The term "rigour" itself functions as a potent allusion or echo to Israel's historical experience of brutal oppression in Egypt, invoking the collective memory of their bondage and God's liberating act. This historical analogy serves as a strong ethical reminder: "Do not become what you escaped." The verse uses the imperative mood ("Thou shalt not rule," "shalt fear"), conveying a direct, non-negotiable divine command, emphasizing the seriousness and mandatory nature of this ethical instruction. The structure also presents a clear motivation-action relationship: the fear of God is presented as the foundational reason for abstaining from oppressive behavior, framing ethical conduct as an act of piety.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Leviticus 25:43 profoundly underscores God's character as a God of justice, mercy, and compassion, particularly for the vulnerable and marginalized. It reveals that true piety is not merely ritualistic observance but extends deeply into ethical conduct in daily life and social relationships. The command to "fear God" is presented as the ultimate motivation for social justice, demonstrating that genuine reverence for God necessarily translates into righteous actions toward fellow human beings. This principle reflects the broader covenantal ethic that Israel's identity as God's redeemed people obligated them to live distinctively, embodying His holiness and justice in all their interactions. It teaches that all human beings, regardless of their social or economic status, possess inherent dignity because they are created and ultimately owned by God, making their mistreatment an offense against the Creator Himself.
Reflection and Application
While the specific context of Israelite bondservitude is ancient, the timeless principles embedded in Leviticus 25:43 remain profoundly relevant for believers today. This verse challenges us to critically examine our attitudes and actions toward all individuals, especially those in positions of vulnerability, dependency, or lesser power. It calls us to embody God's character of justice and mercy in every sphere of life—in our workplaces, our homes, our communities, and our global interactions. We are to be vigilant against any form of exploitation, harshness, or dehumanization, whether it manifests as unfair labor practices, dismissive treatment of subordinates, a lack of empathy for the marginalized, or even subtle forms of relational control. Our motivation for such ethical conduct must stem from a deep, reverential "fear of God"—a recognition of His ultimate authority, His ownership over all humanity, and His call for us to reflect His righteousness. When we treat others with dignity, fairness, and compassion, we are not merely adhering to humanistic principles, but actively honoring the God who delivered us from our own spiritual bondage and calls us to freedom, justice, and love.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What does "rigour" specifically mean in the context of Leviticus 25:43?
In Leviticus 25:43, "rigour" translates the Hebrew word perek (פֶּרֶךְ, H6531), which denotes severity, harshness, cruelty, or oppressive force. It's a significant term because it is also used in Exodus 1:13-14 to describe the cruel and brutal labor imposed on the Israelites by the Egyptians. Therefore, when God commands Israel not to rule with "rigour" over their own bondservants, He is explicitly telling them not to replicate the very oppression they suffered. This means not demanding excessive or dehumanizing work, not treating them as mere property, not demeaning their personhood, and not exploiting their vulnerable position for undue gain. It's a prohibition against any treatment that strips a person of their dignity and humanity, reflecting God's profound concern for the welfare of all people.
How does "fearing God" relate to treating others justly and compassionately?
The command to "fear thy God" is the foundational motivation for treating others justly and compassionately. This "fear" is not terror or dread, but a profound reverence, awe, and respect for God's holiness, sovereignty, and character. It means recognizing that God is the ultimate owner of all people (Leviticus 25:55) and that our actions toward others are ultimately acts of obedience or disobedience to Him. When we truly fear God, we understand that He is a God of justice and mercy, and He demands that His people reflect His character in their interactions. Therefore, treating others with dignity, fairness, and compassion is a direct expression of our reverence and love for God, shaping our ethical conduct in all relationships, especially with the vulnerable, and transforming social ethics into a sacred duty.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Leviticus 25:43, with its command to avoid "rigour" and to "fear thy God" in the treatment of the vulnerable, finds its ultimate and perfect fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. He is the embodiment of divine justice and mercy, perfectly demonstrating what it means to "fear God" in absolute obedience and love. Christ never ruled with rigour; instead, He came not to be served, but to serve, and to give His life as a ransom for many (Mark 10:45). His life and teachings consistently championed the inherent dignity of every individual, especially the marginalized, the poor, and the oppressed, as seen in His parables and interactions. He taught the Golden Rule, urging His followers to "do to others what you would have them do to you" (Matthew 7:12), which is the positive, active expression of the Levitical prohibition against oppression. Furthermore, Christ's sacrificial act on the cross redeemed humanity from the ultimate "rigour" of sin and death, liberating us from spiritual bondage and making us His own (1 Peter 1:18-19). As believers, we are now His bondservants, called to serve Him not out of fear of punishment, but out of love and gratitude, mirroring His own humility and selfless service (Philippians 2:5-8). Our Christ-centered identity compels us to extend the same grace, dignity, and freedom we have received to all those around us, fulfilling the spirit of this ancient command in the new covenant by living out the liberating power of the Gospel.