Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And Benjamin went forth against them out of Gibeah the second day, and destroyed down to the ground of the children of Israel again eighteen thousand men; all these drew the sword.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And Benjamin H1144 went forth H3318 against H7125 them out of Gibeah H1390 the second H8145 day H3117, and destroyed down H7843 to the ground H776 of the children H1121 of Israel H3478 again eighteen H8083 H6240 thousand H505 men H376; all these drew H8025 the sword H2719.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
But Binyamin went out against them from Giv'ah the second day and slaughtered the army of Isra'el; 18,000 men armed with swords fell.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
That same day the Benjamites came out against them from Gibeah and cut down another 18,000 Israelites, all of them armed with swords.
Ask
American Standard Version
And Benjamin went forth against them out of Gibeah the second day, and destroyed down to the ground of the children of Israel again eighteen thousand men; all these drew the sword.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Benjamin went out against them out of Gibeah the second day, and destroyed down to the ground of the children of Israel again eighteen thousand men; all these drew the sword.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Also the second day Beniamin came forth to meete them out of Gibeah, and slewe downe to the grounde of the children of Israel againe eighteene thousand men: all they could handle the sword.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and Benjamin cometh out to meet them from Gibeah on the second day, and destroy among the sons of Israel again eighteen thousand men--to the earth; all these are drawing sword.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
Sins of the Benjaminites
Sins of the Benjaminites View full PDF
Judges and Enemies Overview
Judges and Enemies Overview View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 7,080 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Judges 20:25 records the second devastating defeat of the combined Israelite tribes by the smaller tribe of Benjamin during a brutal civil war. This verse grimly highlights the immense human cost of internal conflict and unaddressed sin within God's people, revealing a profound spiritual crisis that led to widespread bloodshed and near-annihilation for one of the tribes. It underscores the severity of the judgment and the surprising resilience of Benjamin, setting the stage for a critical turning point in the narrative where Israel is forced to a deeper level of repentance.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Judges 20:25 is a critical moment within the final, somber chapters of the Book of Judges (chapters 19-21), which narrate a horrific civil war. The preceding chapter, Judges 19, details the heinous crime committed by men of Gibeah, a Benjamite city, against a Levite's concubine, leading to her death. This atrocity prompts the Levite to dismember her body and send parts to all the tribes of Israel, demanding justice. Judges 20 opens with the assembly of the other Israelite tribes at Mizpah, united in their outrage and resolve to confront Benjamin. Despite their righteous indignation and initial inquiry of the Lord, the Israelites suffer two consecutive and devastating defeats at the hands of the Benjamites, losing 22,000 men on the first day (Judges 20:21) and another 18,000 on the second, as detailed in this verse. This shocking turn of events forces the Israelites to a deeper level of lament and renewed supplication before the Lord, setting the stage for the third, decisive battle. The narrative emphasizes the escalating tragedy and the profound spiritual disorientation of the nation, highlighting the consequences of their moral decline.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The events of Judges 19-21 are set in a period often summarized by the concluding statement of the book: "In those days there was no king in Israel: every man did that which was right in his own eyes" (Judges 21:25). This era, following the conquest of Canaan and preceding the monarchy, was characterized by a lack of centralized authority, moral decay, and frequent cycles of apostasy, oppression, and deliverance through divinely appointed judges. The specific geographical locations, Gibeah (in Benjamin) and Bethel/Mizpah (where Israel assembled and inquired of God), were significant tribal and religious centers. The Benjamites' refusal to surrender the wicked men of Gibeah, despite the overwhelming demand from the other tribes, reflects a fierce tribal loyalty that superseded the demands of justice and covenantal law. This period highlights the challenges of maintaining national unity and adherence to Mosaic law in the absence of strong, unified leadership and a deeply rooted spiritual commitment. The military tactics described, involving large-scale engagements of armed men ("drew the sword"), are consistent with ancient Near Eastern warfare, emphasizing the brutal reality of inter-tribal conflict and the high stakes of such internal disputes.
  • Key Themes: Judges 20:25 powerfully contributes to several overarching themes in the Book of Judges. Firstly, it underscores The High Cost of Unaddressed Sin, demonstrating how the failure of Benjamin to purge wickedness from its midst not only brought judgment upon themselves but also inflicted catastrophic suffering upon the entire nation. This local crime escalated into a national tragedy, illustrating the pervasive and destructive nature of sin when condoned or protected. Secondly, the repeated and unexpected defeats of the larger Israelite army, despite their seemingly righteous cause and repeated inquiries of the Lord, highlight a theme of Divine Judgment and Testing. God's allowing these losses, even when Israel was seeking His counsel (albeit perhaps with insufficient humility or repentance), suggests a deeper purpose—to purify their motives, expose their own spiritual shortcomings, or impress upon them the gravity of their national apostasy. Finally, this verse is a stark illustration of Internal Strife and Disunity among God's chosen people. This civil war, leading to immense bloodshed and the near-annihilation of one of the twelve tribes, serves as a profound warning against the dangers of division and the breakdown of covenantal solidarity within the community of faith, echoing the warnings found in Deuteronomy 28.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • destroyed (Hebrew, shâchath', H7843): The verb שָׁחַת (shâchath), here in the Hiphil stem (causative), means "to cause to spoil, corrupt, ruin, destroy, lay waste." Its use here, "destroyed down to the ground" (וַיַּשְׁחִיתוּ אַרְצָה vayyashḥitu 'artzaḥ), emphasizes the utter devastation and complete routing of the Israelite forces. It's not merely a defeat but a destructive annihilation, leaving no doubt about the severity of the blow. This verb is often used in the Old Testament to describe divine judgment or the consequences of sin, indicating a profound moral or physical decay.
  • drew (Hebrew, shâlaph', H8025): The verb שָׁלַף (shâlaph), a primitive root, means "to pull out, up or off." In the context of "drew the sword," it refers to the act of unsheathing or drawing a weapon for battle. This highlights the readiness and intention of the men to engage in combat, emphasizing that the casualties were active participants in the war, not passive victims.
  • sword (Hebrew, chereb', H2719): The noun חֶרֶב (chereb) refers to a "cutting instrument," primarily a sword, but also an axe, dagger, or other sharp implement, often associated with its destructive effect. The mention of "the sword" here signifies the instrument of war and death, reinforcing the brutal reality of the conflict and the violent demise of the Israelite soldiers.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And Benjamin went forth against them out of Gibeah the second day,": This clause establishes the continued aggression and strategic initiative of the Benjamites. The phrase "the second day" links this defeat directly to the previous day's engagement, emphasizing the sustained nature of the conflict and the repeated failures of the Israelite coalition. It highlights Benjamin's continued defiance and military prowess, as they once again launched their counter-attack from their stronghold, Gibeah.
  • "and destroyed down to the ground of the children of Israel again eighteen thousand men;": This is the core of the verse, detailing the catastrophic outcome for the Israelites. The phrase "destroyed down to the ground" signifies a complete rout and slaughter, not just a tactical retreat, indicating that the Israelite forces were utterly annihilated or scattered. The number "eighteen thousand men" represents a massive loss, adding to the 22,000 lost on the first day (Judges 20:21), bringing the total to 40,000. The word "again" underscores the repeated nature of their defeat, compounding the shock and despair for the larger Israelite army and emphasizing their inability to overcome Benjamin despite their numerical superiority.
  • "all these drew the sword.": This final clause clarifies the nature of the casualties: these were not accidental deaths or non-combatants, but fully armed and prepared warriors. This detail intensifies the tragedy, emphasizing the loss of valuable military strength and the depth of the humiliation for the combined tribes of Israel. It portrays a professional army being decisively defeated by a smaller, seemingly less formidable foe, highlighting the surprising and devastating effectiveness of Benjamin's resistance.

Literary Devices

The narrative of Judges 20:25 employs several powerful literary devices. Irony is profoundly present, as the combined tribes of Israel, acting with what they perceive as righteous indignation and even seeking divine counsel, are repeatedly defeated by the very tribe they seek to punish. This outcome is counter-intuitive and serves to highlight a deeper spiritual problem within Israel, suggesting that their initial approach was flawed despite their seemingly noble cause. The Repetition of defeat ("again eighteen thousand men," following the 22,000) emphasizes the severity of the judgment and the persistent failure of Israel's initial military approach, driving home the point that their numerical superiority and military might alone were insufficient. The phrase "destroyed down to the ground" could be seen as Hyperbole, underscoring the totality and brutality of the defeat, aiming to evoke a strong emotional response and convey the utter devastation suffered by the Israelites. This vivid language paints a grim picture of the civil war's human cost and the profound spiritual crisis facing the nation.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Judges 20:25 is a stark testament to the profound consequences of sin, both individual and corporate, and the mysterious ways of divine judgment. The repeated defeats of the Israelites, despite their numerical superiority and initial consultation with God, suggest that God was not merely endorsing their military campaign but was perhaps testing their motives, refining their understanding of justice, or allowing them to experience the full weight of their own spiritual decline. This period of civil war reveals a nation deeply fractured, where tribal loyalty superseded covenantal obligation, and where the pursuit of justice was tainted by a lack of humility and perhaps a self-righteous spirit. The devastating losses underscore that God's people, when steeped in unaddressed sin and disunity, are vulnerable to internal destruction, even when ostensibly fighting for a righteous cause. It highlights the critical need for true repentance and a humble reliance on God's wisdom, not just His power.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Judges 20:25 serves as a somber reminder that even those who claim God's name can suffer devastating consequences when sin is tolerated or when actions are undertaken without true humility and alignment with God's deeper purposes. The Israelites, though seemingly on the side of justice, experienced profound defeat, forcing them to a deeper level of self-examination and repentance before God. This narrative challenges us to consider not only the righteousness of our cause but also the purity of our hearts and the depth of our dependence on God. It teaches us that God's ways are higher than our ways, and sometimes, setbacks are divinely orchestrated to humble us, expose hidden sin, and lead us to a more profound reliance on Him. For the church today, this passage underscores the critical importance of confronting sin within the community, fostering genuine unity, and approaching all endeavors, even those seemingly righteous, with humility, prayer, and a willingness to truly listen for God's voice, especially in the face of unexpected adversity. It calls us to remember that true victory is found not merely in strength or strategy, but in walking in humble obedience and purity before the Lord.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the repeated defeat of the Israelites, despite their numerical superiority, challenge our assumptions about God's immediate blessing on "righteous" causes?
  • What might God have been teaching the Israelites through these devastating losses before granting them victory?
  • In what ways might unaddressed sin or internal disunity in our own lives or communities lead to unexpected and painful consequences?
  • How can we ensure that our pursuit of justice or truth is always tempered with humility, self-examination, and genuine dependence on God?

FAQ

Why did God allow Israel to be defeated twice, even though they were fighting against evil and had inquired of Him?

Answer: The text indicates that the Israelites did inquire of God before each battle, asking "Who shall go up first for us to battle against the children of Benjamin?" (Judges 20:18) and "Shall I go up again to battle against the children of Benjamin my brother?" (Judges 20:23). However, their initial inquiries may have been more about strategy than deep repentance or humility. God's allowance of these defeats served multiple purposes: it was a test of their perseverance and faith, a means to humble them, and a way to expose the deeper spiritual malaise within Israel. The nation itself was steeped in sin, as evidenced by the recurring phrase "every man did that which was right in his own eyes" (Judges 21:25). The defeats forced the Israelites to weep before the Lord, fast, and offer sacrifices, leading to a more profound and humble seeking of God's will before the third, successful battle (Judges 20:26-28). It demonstrated that victory comes not merely from a righteous cause or numerical superiority, but from a right relationship with God, characterized by humility and genuine repentance.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The grim narrative of Judges 20:25, with its depiction of internal strife, devastating loss, and the consequences of unaddressed sin within God's people, profoundly highlights the desperate need for a true King and a perfect High Priest—roles ultimately fulfilled in Jesus Christ. The chaos and moral decay of the Judges period, where "every man did that which was right in his own eyes" (Judges 21:25), foreshadow the human inability to achieve lasting peace or justice apart from divine leadership. The civil war, where brother fought brother, reveals the brokenness of humanity and the pervasive power of sin, which alienates us from God and from one another. Jesus, as the ultimate Prince of Peace, comes to reconcile not only humanity to God but also to bring unity among believers, breaking down the "dividing wall of hostility" (Ephesians 2:14). Unlike the temporary and often flawed judges, Christ is the perfect Judge who executes true justice and the compassionate Shepherd who lays down His life for His sheep (John 10:11). The immense cost of sin seen in Judges 20:25 points to the even greater cost of redemption, paid by the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, offering true forgiveness and reconciliation that no human effort or sacrifice could achieve. Through His atoning work, Christ establishes a new covenant, uniting believers from every tribe and nation into one body, the church, where true peace and justice are found in Him (Colossians 3:15). He is the true leader who brings order out of chaos, not by military might, but by sacrificial love and the power of His Spirit.

Copy as

Commentary on Judges 20 verses 18–25

We have here the defeat of the men of Israel in their first and second battle with the Benjamites.

I. Before their first engagement they asked counsel of God concerning the order of their battle and were directed, and yet they were sorely beaten. They did not think it was proper to ask of God whether they should go up at all against Benjamin (the case was plain enough, the men of Gibeah must be punished for their wickedness, and Israel must inflict the punishment or it will not be done), but "Who shall go first?" (Jdg 20:18), that is, "Who shall be general of our army?" for, which soever tribe was appointed to go first, the prince of that tribe must be looked upon as commander-in-chief of the whole body. For, if they had meant it of the order of their march only, it would have been proper to ask, "Who shall go next?" and then, "Who next?" But, if they know that Judah must go first, they know they must all observe the orders of the prince of that tribe. This honour was done to Judah because our Lord Jesus was to spring from that tribe, who was in all things to have the pre-eminence. The tribe that went up first had the most honourable post, but withal the most dangerous, and probably lost most in the engagement. Who would strive for precedency that sees the peril of it? Yet though Judah, that strong and valiant tribe, goes up first, and all the tribes of Israel attend them, little Benjamin (so he is called, Psa 68:27), is too hard for them all. The whole army lays siege to Gibeah, Jdg 20:19. The Benjamites advance to raise the siege, and the army prepares to give them a warm reception (Jdg 20:20). But between the Benjamites that attacked them in the front with incredible fury, and the men of Gibeah that sallied out upon their rear, they were put into confusion and lost 22,000 men, Jdg 20:21. Here were no prisoners taken, for there was no quarter given, but all put to the sword.

II. Before their second engagement they again asked counsel of God, and more solemnly than before; for they wept before the Lord until evening (Jdg 20:23), lamenting the loss of so many brave men, especially as it was a token of God's displeasure and would give occasion to the Benjamites to triumph in the success of their wickedness. Also at this time they did not ask who should go up first, but whether they should go up at all. The intimate a reason why they should scruple to do it, especially now that Providence had frowned upon them, because Benjamin was their brother, and a readiness to lay down their arms if God should so order them. God bade them go up; he allowed the attempt, for, though Benjamin was their brother, he was a gangrened member of their body and must be cut off. Upon this they encouraged themselves, perhaps more in their own strength than in the divine commission, and made a second attempt upon the forces of the rebels, in the same place where the former battle was fought (Jdg 20:22), with the hope of retrieving their credit upon the same spot of ground where they had lost it, which they would not superstitiously change, as if there were any thing unlucky in the place. But they were this second time repulsed, with the loss of 18,000 men, Jdg 20:25. The former day's loss and this amounted to 40,000, which was just a tenth part of the whole army, and the same number that they had drawn out by lot to fetch victuals, Jdg 20:10. They decimated themselves for that service, and now God again decimated them for the slaughter. But what shall we say to these things, that so just and honourable a cause should thus be put to the worst once and again? Were they not fighting God's battle against sin? Had they not his commission? What, and yet miscarry thus! 1. God's judgments are a great deep, and his way is in the sea. Clouds and darkness are often round about him, but judgment and justice are always the habitation of his throne. We may be sure of the righteousness, when we cannot see the reasons, of God's proceedings. 2. God would hereby show them, and us in them, that the race is not to the swift nor the battle to the strong, that we are not to confide in numbers, which perhaps the Israelites did with too much assurance. We must never lay the weight on an arm of flesh, which only the Rock of ages will bear. 3. God designed hereby to correct Israel for their sins. They did well to show such a zeal against the wickedness of Gibeah: but were there not with them, even with them, sins against the Lord their God? Those must be made to know their own iniquity that are forward in condemning the iniquity of others. Some think it was a rebuke to them for not witnessing against the idolatry of Micah and the Danites, by which their religion was corrupted, as they now did against the lewdness of Gibeah and the Benjamites, by which the public peace was disturbed, though God had particularly ordered them to levy war upon idolaters, Deu 13:12, etc. 4. God would hereby teach us not to think it strange if a good cause should suffer defeat fore a while, nor to judge of the merits of it by the success of it. The interest of grace in the heart, and of religion in the world, may be foiled, and suffer great loss, and seem to be quite run down, but judgment will be brought forth to victory at last. Vincimur in praelio, sed non in bello - We are foiled in a battle, but not in the whole campaign. Right may fall, but it shall arise.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 18–25. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Judges 20:25 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.