- English
- King James KJV
- Complete Jewish CJB
- World English WEBM
- Berean Standard BSB
- American Standard ASV
- Geneva GNV
- Young's Literal YLT
- Douay-Rheims DRC
- International
- Shqip ALB
- العربية SVD
- বাংলা BN-IRV
- မြန်မာ Judson
- 简体文 CUV-S
- 繁體中文 CUV-T
- Čeština BKR
- Nederlands STVE
- Français LSG
- Deutsch SCH
- Ελληνικά Vamvas
- ગુજરાતી GU-IRV
- Hausa HCB
- עברית Hebrew
- हिन्दी HCV
- Magyar KAROLI
- Bahasa Indonesia INDO-TB
- Italiano Diodati
- 日本語 Kougo
- 한국어 Korean
- മലയാളം MAL
- मराठी MRCV
- Norsk DNB
- فارسی OPV
- Polski BG
- Português Almeida
- Română Cornilescu
- Русский Synodal
- Español RVG
- Kiswahili Neno
- Svenska SV1917
- Tagalog TAG-ADB
- தமிழ் TCV
- తెలుగు TSA
- ภาษาไทย THAI-KJV
- Українська Ohienko
- Tiếng Việt CADMAN
- Yorùbá YCB
See on the biblical-era map

Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Joshua 9:3–14. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Here, I. The Gibeonites desire to make peace with Israel, being alarmed by the tidings they heard of the destruction of Jericho, Jos 9:3. Other people heard those tidings, and were irritated thereby to make war upon Israel; but the Gibeonites heard them and were induced to make peace with them. Thus the discovery of the glory and grace of God in the gospel is to some a savour of life unto life, but to others a savour of death unto death, Co2 2:16. The same sun softens wax and hardens clay. I do not remember that we read any where of a king of Gibeon. Had their government been at this time in a single person, perhaps his heart would have been too high to yield to Israel, and he would have joined with the rest of the kings against Israel. But these four united cities (mentioned Jos 9:17) seem to have been governed by elders, or senators (Jos 9:11), who consulted the common safety more than their own personal dignity. The inhabitants of Gibeon did well for themselves. We have,
II.The method they took to compass it.
They knew that all the inhabitants of the land of Canaan were to be cut off; perhaps they had some spies in the congregation at Ebal, when the law was read, who observed and brought them notice of the command given to Israel (Deu 7:1-3), that they should show no mercy to the Canaanites, give them no quarter in battle, which made them afraid of fighting them, and that they should make no covenant with them, which made them despair of gaining any advantage by treating with them; and therefore there was no way of saving their lives from the sword of Israel unless they could, by disguising themselves, make Joshua believe that they came from some very country, which the Israelites were not commanded to make war upon nor forbidden to make peace with, but were particularly appointed to offer peace to, Deu 20:10, Deu 20:15. Unless they could be admitted under this notion, they saw there was but one way with them: they must submit to the fate of Jericho and Ai. Though the neighbouring princes knew that all the men thereof were mighty (Jos 10:2), and they knew it themselves, yet they durst not contend with Israel, who had an Almighty God on their side. This therefore is the only game they have to play, and observe,
1.They play it very artfully and successfully. Never was any such thing more craftily managed.
(1.)They come under the character of ambassadors from a foreign state, which they thought would please the princes of Israel, and make them proud of the honour of being courted by distant countries: we find Hezekiah fond of those that came to him from a far country (Isa 39:3); they were not used to be thus courted.
(2.)They pretended to have undergone the fatigues of a very long journey, and produced what passed for an ocular demonstration of it. It should seem it was then usual for those that undertook long journeys to take with them, as we do now for long voyages, all manner of provision in kind, the country not being furnished as ours is now with houses of entertainment, for the convenience of which, when we have occasion to make use of them, we have reason to be very thankful. Now they here pretended that their provision, when they brought it from home, was fresh and new, but now it appeared to be old and dry, whereas it might well be presumed they had not loitered, but made the best of their way; so that hence it must be inferred that they came, as they said they did, from a very far country: their sacks or portmanteaus were old; the wine was all drunk, and the bottles in which it had been were broken; their shoes and clothes were worse than those of the Israelites in forty years, and their bread was mouldy, Jos 9:4, Jos 9:5, and again, Jos 9:12, Jos 9:13. Thus God's Israel have often been deceived and imposed upon with a show of antiquity. But (as bishop Hall expresses it) errors are never the older for being patched, and so seeming old; but those that will be caught with this Gibeonitish stratagem prove they have not consulted with God. And thus there are those who make themselves poor with the badges of want and distress and yet have great riches (Pro 13:7), or at least have no need of relief, by which fraud charity is misplaced and diverted from those that are real objects of it.
(3.)When they were suspected, and more strictly examined as to whence they came, they industriously declined telling the name of their country, till the agreement was settled. [1.] The men of Israel suspected a fraud (Jos 9:7): "Peradventure you dwell among us, and then we may not, we must not, make any league with you." This might have discouraged the Gibeonites from urging the matter any further, concluding that if the peace were made the Israelites would not think themselves obliged to keep it, having thus solemnly protested against it in case they dwelt among them; but, knowing that there was no hope at all if they stood it out, they bravely ventured a submission. "Who knows but the people of Israel may save us alive, though thus inveigled into a promise; and if we tell them at last we shall but die." [2.] Joshua put the questions to them, Who are you? and whence come you? He finds himself concerned to stand upon his guard against secret fraud as well as against open force. We in our spiritual warfare must stand against the wiles of the devil, remembering he is a subtle serpent as well as a roaring lion. In all leagues of relation and friendship we must first try and then trust, lest we repent at leisure agreements made in haste. [3.] They would not tell whence they came; but still repeat the same thing: We have come from a very far country, Jos 9:9. They will have it thought that it is a country Joshua knows nothing of nor ever heard of, and therefore would be never the wiser if they should tell him the name of it.
(4.)They profess a respect for the God of Israel, the more to ingratiate themselves with Joshua, and we charitably believe they were sincere in this profession: "We have come because of the name of the Lord thy God (v. 9), because of what we have heard of that name, which has convinced us that it is above every name, and because we have a desire towards that name and the remembrance of it, and would gladly come under its protection."
(5.)They fetch their inducements from what had been done some time before in Moses's reign, the tidings whereof might easily be supposed ere this to have reached distant regions, the plagues of Egypt and the destruction of Sihon and Og (v. 9, 10), but prudently say nothing of the destruction of Jericho and Ai (though this was the true inducement, v. 3), because they will have it supposed that they came from home long before those conquests were made. We need not be long to seek for reasons why we should submit to the God of Israel; we may be furnished either with new or old, which we will.
(6.)They make a general submission - We are our servants; and humbly sue for a general agreement - Make a league with us, v. 11. They insist not upon terms, but will be glad of peace upon any terms; nor will the case admit of delays, lest the fraud be discovered; they would fain have the bargain struck up immediately; if Joshua will but make a league with them, they have all they come for, and they hope their ragged clothes and clouted shoes will be no exception against them. God and Israel reject none for their poverty. But,
2.There is a mixture of good and evil in their conduct.
(1.)Their falsehood cannot be justified, nor ought it to be drawn into a precedent. We must not do evil that good may come. Had they owned their country but renounced the idolatries of it, resigning the possession of it to Israel and themselves to the God of Israel, we have reason to think Joshua would have been directed by the oracle of God to spare their lives, and they needed not to have made these pretensions. It is observable that when they had once said, We have come from a far country (Jos 9:6), they found themselves necessitated to say it again (Jos 9:9), and to say what was utterly false concerning their bread, their bottles, and their clothes (Jos 9:12, Jos 9:13), for one lie is an inlet to another, and that to a third, and so on. The way of that sin is down-hill. But,
(2.)Their faith and prudence are to be greatly commended. Our Lord commended even the unjust steward, because he had done wisely and well for himself, Luk 16:8. In submitting to Israel, they submitted to the God of Israel, which implied a renunciation of the god they had served, a resignation to the laws of true religion. They had heard enough to convince them of the infinite power of the God of Israel, and thence might infer his other perfections of wisdom and goodness; and how can we do better for ourselves than surrender at discretion to infinite wisdom, and cast ourselves upon the mercy of a God of infinite goodness. The submission of these Gibeonites was the more laudable because it was,
[1.]Singular. Their neighbours took another course, and expected they should join with them.
[2.]Speedy. They did not stay till Israel had besieged their cities; then it would have been too late to capitulate; but when they were at some distance they desired conditions of peace. Thy way to avoid a judgment is to meet it by repentance. Let us imitate these Gibeonites, and make our peace with God in the rags of humiliation, godly sorrow, and mortification, so our iniquity shall not be our ruin. Let us be servants to Jesus, our blessed Joshua, and make a league with him and the Israel of God, and we shall live.
Continue studying Joshua 9:10 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Joshua 9:10 forms a pivotal element in the Gibeonites' elaborate deception, as they strategically recount Israel's renowned victories over Sihon, king of Heshbon, and Og, king of Bashan. These formidable Amorite kings, whose territories lay "beyond Jordan" (east of the river), were defeated by Israel under Moses' leadership, and the Gibeonites cited these well-known conquests to bolster their fabricated story of originating from a distant land. This cunning maneuver aimed to convince Joshua and the Israelite leaders to form a peace treaty, thereby sparing themselves from the commanded destruction of Canaanite inhabitants. The verse thus highlights the widespread reputation of God's power working through Israel, which paradoxically became the very foundation for a ruse that ensnared the Israelites in an ill-advised covenant.
Context
Literary Context
Joshua 9:10 is intricately woven into the narrative of the Gibeonites' cunning ruse, immediately following Israel's decisive victories at Jericho and Ai. The preceding verses Joshua 9:1-2 detail the fear that gripped the inhabitants of Canaan upon hearing of Israel's conquests, prompting the Gibeonites to devise an elaborate plan to secure a peace treaty with Israel Joshua 9:3-5. Their strategy involved presenting themselves as envoys from a "very far country" Joshua 9:6, using worn-out provisions and clothing as evidence of their long journey. Verse 10 serves as a crucial piece of their fabricated narrative, where they recount Israel's past, undeniable victories over Sihon and Og as proof of their knowledge of Israel's God and their supposed distant origin. This elaborate deception culminates in Israel's failure to inquire of the Lord Joshua 9:14, leading to a binding covenant that later became a source of significant trouble and a test of Israel's faithfulness.
Historical & Cultural Context
The period described in Joshua is the initial phase of Israel's conquest of Canaan, following their forty years in the wilderness and the Exodus from Egypt. The Amorites were a powerful and widespread Semitic people group, frequently depicted as formidable adversaries inhabiting significant portions of Canaan and the Transjordan region. The victories over Sihon, king of Heshbon, and Og, king of Bashan, were not recent events but had occurred under Moses' leadership before Israel crossed the Jordan River, as recounted in detail in Numbers 21:21-35 and Deuteronomy 3:1-11. These conquests were foundational, establishing Israel's presence and reputation in the region and demonstrating the power of their God. In the ancient Near East, treaties were solemn agreements, often involving oaths and divine witnesses, and violating them carried severe consequences. The Gibeonites' fear was deeply rooted in the widespread knowledge of Israel's God and their track record of total annihilation against those who resisted His commands.
Key Themes
This verse contributes to several key themes within the book of Joshua and the broader Pentateuch. Firstly, it underscores God's Demonstrable Power and Reputation, showing how the news of His mighty acts (specifically the defeat of formidable kings like Sihon and Og) had spread throughout the land, instilling fear in the surrounding nations (compare Exodus 15:14-16). Secondly, it highlights the Danger of Deception and Lack of Discernment. The Gibeonites' fear-driven ruse, while strategically brilliant, relied on a falsehood, and Israel's failure to consult the Lord before acting (as explicitly stated in Joshua 9:14) led them into a covenant they were not meant to make. Thirdly, it reinforces the theme of Divine Command and Covenant Fidelity. God had commanded Israel to utterly destroy the inhabitants of Canaan, and the Gibeonite deception challenged this command, revealing the complexities of obedience and the critical need for constant reliance on divine guidance in fulfilling God's will for the land.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This primitive root signifies "to do or make, in the broadest sense and widest application." In Joshua 9:10, it refers to the mighty acts of God, working through Moses and Israel, in defeating the Amorite kings. The Gibeonites' use of this word acknowledges the powerful, decisive actions that established Israel's reputation and instilled fear in the surrounding nations. It emphasizes the completed, impactful nature of these past victories.
This word denotes "a king" or "royal." The mention of "two kings of the Amorites" highlights the formidable nature of the adversaries Israel had overcome. Kings in the ancient Near East wielded significant power, controlling armies and territories. By specifying that these were kings, the Gibeonites underscored the magnitude of Israel's divine-backed military successes, making their account of Israel's widespread fame more credible.
This term identifies a prominent Canaanitish tribe, often associated with mountainous regions and formidable strength. In biblical narratives, the Amorites frequently represent powerful, entrenched enemies of Israel. Their defeat, particularly that of two of their kings, was a testament to God's power and Israel's divinely-assisted conquest, serving as a key piece of evidence for the Gibeonites' fabricated story of Israel's far-reaching reputation.
Verse Breakdown
"And all that he did to the two kings of the Amorites,"
This opening phrase refers to the mighty acts of Yahweh, working through Moses and the Israelite army. The Gibeonites implicitly acknowledge the divine hand behind Israel's military success, recognizing that "he" (God, or God's instrument Moses) was the one who accomplished these great feats. The "two kings of the Amorites" immediately identifies Sihon and Og, highlighting their status as powerful rulers of a formidable people group, thereby emphasizing the magnitude of Israel's victories.
"that [were] beyond Jordan,"
This clause specifies the geographical location of these significant victories. The Transjordan region, east of the Jordan River, was the first major territory conquered by Israel under Moses, prior to their entry into Canaan proper. By mentioning this geographical detail, the Gibeonites strategically emphasize the early and widely known nature of these conquests, suggesting that news of such events would have traveled far and wide, reaching even a supposedly distant land.
"to Sihon king of Heshbon, and to Og king of Bashan,"
These are the specific names of the two renowned Amorite kings who were decisively defeated by Israel. Sihon ruled from Heshbon, a strategic city, and Og ruled Bashan, a fertile region known for its strong fortifications and the immense stature of its king Deuteronomy 3:11. Their names would have been synonymous with overwhelming power and subsequent defeat, serving as undeniable proof of Israel's military might and God's intervention, making the Gibeonites' account highly convincing.
"which [was] at Ashtaroth."
This final detail specifies the capital city of Og's kingdom, Bashan. Ashtaroth was an important city, likely associated with the worship of the goddess Ashtoreth. Including this specific geographical and cultural detail further grounds the Gibeonites' story in verifiable historical facts, making their account more convincing and demonstrating their supposed intimate knowledge of Israel's past campaigns, thus lending credibility to their claim of having traveled from a far-off land.
Literary Devices
Joshua 9:10 masterfully employs Allusion and Irony. The Gibeonites' speech is a deliberate Allusion to well-known historical events—Israel's victories over Sihon and Og—which were foundational to Israel's identity and reputation as a divinely-empowered nation. This serves to establish credibility for their fabricated story, as they are referencing undeniable truths. The profound Irony lies in the fact that the Gibeonites use these very truths about God's power and Israel's fearsome reputation to perpetrate a deception. They leverage God's glory and Israel's past successes as the very tools to manipulate God's people into a forbidden covenant. This highlights the deceptive nature of appearances and the danger of relying solely on external evidence without seeking divine counsel. There is also a subtle element of Foreshadowing, as Israel's failure of discernment here prefigures later instances in their history where they would be led astray by external appearances or fail to consult God.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Joshua 9:10 powerfully illustrates how God's mighty acts reverberate through the world, shaping the perceptions and actions of nations. The Gibeonites' fear, though leading to deception, was a direct consequence of God's demonstrable power on behalf of Israel. This verse underscores the theological truth that God's reputation precedes His people, and His faithfulness in fulfilling His promises (like giving Israel the land) has tangible, far-reaching effects. It also serves as a poignant reminder of the human tendency to manipulate truth for self-preservation and the critical importance of divine discernment, as Israel's failure to inquire of the Lord before making a covenant with the Gibeonites had lasting consequences. The narrative highlights that even genuine testimonies of God's power can be twisted or used for unholy purposes if spiritual vigilance is absent, emphasizing the need for constant reliance on divine wisdom.
Reflection and Application
Joshua 9:10 invites us to reflect on the profound impact of God's work, both in history and in our personal lives. Just as the Gibeonites were aware of God's mighty acts through Israel, so too does the world observe the actions and character of God's people today. Our lives, individually and corporately, serve as a testimony to God's power, faithfulness, and presence. This verse challenges us to consider whether our lives genuinely reflect the God we serve, inspiring awe and drawing others to Him, or whether our actions might be perceived as manipulative or lacking integrity. Furthermore, it serves as a powerful warning against making critical decisions without seeking God's counsel. The Israelites' haste and reliance on outward appearances, rather than divine guidance, led them into a binding covenant with deceptive people. In our own lives, when faced with choices, especially those with long-term implications, we must prioritize prayer, scriptural wisdom, and the leading of the Holy Spirit over superficial evidence or human reasoning alone, ensuring our decisions are rooted in divine truth.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Who were Sihon and Og, and why were their defeats so significant?
Sihon was the Amorite king of Heshbon, and Og was the Amorite king of Bashan, whose capital was Ashtaroth. Their defeats were incredibly significant because they represented Israel's first major conquests of established kingdoms in the Transjordan region, east of the Jordan River. These victories, achieved under Moses' leadership (recounted in Numbers 21 and Deuteronomy 3), demonstrated God's power to subdue formidable enemies and fulfilled His promise to give Israel the land. They established Israel's military prowess and God's active presence, spreading fear and awe among the surrounding nations and setting a precedent for the subsequent conquest of Canaan.
Why did the Gibeonites specifically mention these two kings in their deception?
The Gibeonites specifically mentioned Sihon and Og because their defeats were widely known, undeniable historical facts that had occurred before Israel crossed into Canaan proper. By citing these well-known, foundational victories, the Gibeonites aimed to establish their credibility and demonstrate their supposed knowledge of Israel's distant past. Their mention of territories "beyond Jordan" reinforced their claim of having traveled from a very far country, as these were the first major conquests Israel made, implying that news of them would have had ample time to reach distant lands. This strategic use of truth within a lie made their deception highly convincing to the Israelite leaders.
What does "beyond Jordan" mean in this context?
In this context, "beyond Jordan" (Hebrew: bəʿēver hayyardēn) refers to the Transjordan region, the territory situated to the east of the Jordan River. For the Israelites, who were preparing to enter Canaan from the east, this was the land they had already conquered under Moses. The Gibeonites, who lived west of the Jordan, used this geographical marker to imply that they had come from a land even further away than the region Israel had already subdued, thereby supporting their narrative of being from a "very far country" and not one of the local Canaanite peoples whom Israel was commanded to destroy. It served as a key piece of their fabricated backstory.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The narrative of Joshua 9:10, with its themes of God's conquering power, the widespread reputation of His mighty acts, and the human response of fear or deception, finds profound Christ-centered fulfillment. The victories over Sihon and Og, formidable kings, foreshadow the ultimate conquest achieved by Jesus Christ, not over earthly kingdoms, but over the spiritual powers of sin, death, and the devil (compare Colossians 2:15). Just as the fame of Israel's God spread throughout the land, so too has the fame of Jesus, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, spread throughout the earth, inspiring both awe and, at times, opposition. The Gibeonites' fear-driven deception highlights humanity's desperate attempts to secure peace or salvation through self-effort and cunning, rather than through genuine surrender to God's terms. In stark contrast, Christ offers true and lasting peace, not through a deceptive treaty, but through a new covenant sealed by His own blood, inviting all who are "far off" to be brought near by His sacrifice and reconciled to God Ephesians 2:13-16. He is the one who perfectly discerns all hearts and motives, unlike Israel who failed to inquire of the Lord, ensuring that His kingdom is built on truth, grace, and perfect righteousness, not on human manipulation or fear.