Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And out of the tribe of Naphtali, Kedesh in Galilee with her suburbs, to be a city of refuge for the slayer; and Hammothdor with her suburbs, and Kartan with her suburbs; three cities.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And out of the tribe H4294 of Naphtali H5321, Kedesh H6943 in Galilee H1551 with her suburbs H4054, to be a city H5892 of refuge H4733 for the slayer H7523; and Hammothdor H2576 with her suburbs H4054, and Kartan H7178 with her suburbs H4054; three H7969 cities H5892.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Out of the tribe of Naftali: Kedesh in the Galil with its surrounding open land, the city of refuge for the killer; Hammot-Dor with its surrounding open land; and Kartan with its surrounding open land - three cities.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
And from the tribe of Naphtali they were given Kedesh in Galilee (a city of refuge for the manslayer), Hammoth-dor, and Kartan—three cities, together with their pasturelands.
Ask
American Standard Version
And out of the tribe of Naphtali, Kedesh in Galilee with its suburbs, the city of refuge for the manslayer, and Hammoth-dor with its suburbs, and Kartan with its suburbs; three cities.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Out of the tribe of Naphtali, Kedesh in Galilee with its suburbs, the city of refuge for the man slayer, Hammothdor with its suburbs, and Kartan with its suburbs; three cities.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And out of the tribe of Naphtali, the citie of refuge for the slaier, Kedesh in Galil with her suburbes, and Hammoth-dor with her suburbes, and Kartan with her suburbes: three cities.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And out of the tribe of Naphtali, the city of refuge for the man-slayer, Kedesh in Galilee and its suburbs, and Hammoth-Dor and its suburbs, and Kartan and its suburbs--three cities;
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 6,414 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Joshua 21:32 meticulously records the allocation of three Levitical cities from the tribal territory of Naphtali: Kedesh in Galilee, Hammothdor, and Kartan. This verse is pivotal in detailing the fulfillment of God's command for the Levites' inheritance and specifically designates Kedesh as one of the six divinely appointed cities of refuge, underscoring God's precise provision for His consecrated servants and His compassionate yet just system for addressing unintentional homicides within the nascent nation of Israel.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Joshua 21 serves as the climactic conclusion to the detailed land distribution narrative that began in Joshua 13, following the successful military campaigns and initial settlement of Canaan. Chapters 13-19 delineate the inheritances for the twelve tribes, while chapters 20 and 21 focus on the unique provisions for the Levites and the establishment of the cities of refuge. Joshua 21:32 is part of a comprehensive roster (Joshua 21:27-39) that enumerates the cities granted to the Merarite clan of Levites from the tribes of Zebulun, Asher, Naphtali, and Reuben. This precise cataloging emphasizes the meticulous fulfillment of God's covenant promises and commands, demonstrating the orderly establishment of the Israelite nation and ensuring the spiritual well-being of all tribes through the strategic placement of their spiritual leaders. The preceding chapter, Joshua 20, explicitly outlines the divine mandate for these cities, making their specific listing here a direct consequence of that command.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Following the arduous conquest of Canaan, Israel was transitioning from a nomadic, military confederation to a settled, agricultural nation governed by the Mosaic Law. The allocation of land was fundamental to establishing their national identity and social structure. The Levites, consecrated for priestly and tabernacle/temple service, were unique in that they received no tribal land inheritance; instead, they were sustained by tithes and granted specific cities scattered throughout the territories of the other tribes, as commanded in Numbers 35. This arrangement ensured their presence among all tribes, facilitating their roles as teachers of the Law, judges, and spiritual guides. The institution of "cities of refuge" was a groundbreaking legal innovation, designed to prevent the cycle of blood feuds and provide due process for those accused of unintentional homicide, clearly distinguishing it from premeditated murder, as detailed in Deuteronomy 19:1-13. Kedesh, situated in Upper Galilee, was strategically located in the northern region of Israel, making it readily accessible for those fleeing from the northern tribes, thus ensuring equitable access to this vital legal provision.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within the book of Joshua and the broader Pentateuch. It prominently displays God's Divine Order and Provision, showcasing His meticulous planning in settling His people and establishing the necessary spiritual and legal infrastructure for the nation. The designation of Kedesh as a city of refuge profoundly illustrates God's intricate balance of Justice and Mercy, providing a legal framework that upheld the sanctity of human life while offering protection and due process for the unintentionally guilty, reflecting the principles found in Deuteronomy 19:4-6. Furthermore, the strategic distribution of Levitical cities, including those mentioned here, underscores the theme of Levitical Service and Accessibility. This arrangement ensured that spiritual guidance, the teaching of God's Law, and the performance of priestly duties were readily available to all tribes throughout the land, thereby reinforcing the spiritual unity of Israel under God's covenant, as mandated in Numbers 35:1-8.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Kedesh (Hebrew, Qedesh', H6943): From the root meaning "to be holy" or "to be set apart," this name, meaning "sanctum" or "holy place," is profoundly fitting for a city designated as a place of refuge. The etymology suggests a separation or consecration, implying that the city itself, by divine decree, became a sacred space of protection. Entering Kedesh was not merely a legal maneuver but an act of seeking asylum within a divinely ordained sanctuary.
  • Refuge (Hebrew, miqlâṭ', H4733): Derived from a root meaning "to take in" or "to receive," this term specifically refers to an asylum or a place of reception. In the context of the Old Testament, it denotes one of the six cities (three on each side of the Jordan River) established by God's explicit command (e.g., Numbers 35:9-15). These cities provided a divinely sanctioned sanctuary for individuals who had unintentionally caused the death of another, protecting them from the "avenger of blood" until a fair trial could be conducted. This system embodied God's unique blend of justice and mercy within the Mosaic Law, preventing arbitrary vengeance and ensuring due process.
  • Slayer (Hebrew, râtsach', H7523): This primitive root primarily means "to dash in pieces" or "to kill," especially "to murder." However, within the specific legal framework of the cities of refuge, râtsach distinguishes between intentional murder (which warranted the death penalty) and unintentional homicide. In this context, "slayer" refers to an individual who caused a death accidentally, without premeditation or malice aforethought. The system was designed to protect such individuals, granting them the opportunity for a fair hearing and, if found innocent of malicious intent, asylum within the city until the death of the current high priest.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And out of the tribe of Naphtali,": This opening clause precisely identifies the specific tribal territory from which the subsequent cities are allocated. It highlights the meticulous and systematic division of the land among the Israelite tribes and underscores the precise fulfillment of God's instructions regarding the Levitical cities, ensuring that each tribe contributed to the support and strategic placement of the priestly tribe.
  • "Kedesh in Galilee with her suburbs, [to be] a city of refuge for the slayer;": This identifies the first and most significant city from Naphtali's allotment. It notes its geographical location ("in Galilee") and the surrounding pasturelands ("with her suburbs") designated for the Levites' livestock. Crucially, it highlights Kedesh's primary function as one of the six cities of refuge, a divinely appointed sanctuary for those who had unintentionally caused a death, thereby emphasizing God's provision for both justice and mercy within Israel's legal system.
  • "and Hammothdor with her suburbs, and Kartan with her suburbs;": This clause lists the second and third cities from Naphtali's territory that were given to the Levites, along with their associated pasturelands. While these cities were not designated as cities of refuge, they served as vital residences for the Levites, enabling them to fulfill their essential spiritual, judicial, and educational roles among the people of Israel, ensuring the accessibility of God's law and instruction.
  • "three cities.": This concluding phrase provides a clear numerical summary, confirming that exactly three cities were allocated from the tribe of Naphtali to the Levites. This reinforces the precise and ordered nature of the land distribution and the faithful fulfillment of God's commands regarding the Levitical inheritance, leaving no ambiguity about the divine plan.

Literary Devices

Joshua 21:32 employs several literary devices to convey its message with clarity, authority, and theological weight. The most prominent is Enumeration, as the verse systematically lists the cities allocated to the Levites from a specific tribe, along with their key characteristics. This precise listing, a hallmark of Joshua 21, emphasizes the meticulous fulfillment of God's commands and the orderly establishment of Israel's national and spiritual structure. Repetition of the phrase "with her suburbs" throughout the verse and chapter underscores the consistent provision of pasturelands alongside the cities, highlighting the practical and economic support given to the Levites for their sustenance. The verse also utilizes Legal Language or a Formulaic Style, particularly in its designation of Kedesh as a "city of refuge for the slayer." This specific phrasing directly links back to the detailed legal codes concerning these cities found in the Pentateuch, lending an air of official decree and divine authority to the land allocation. Finally, Geographic Specificity ("Kedesh in Galilee," "Hammothdor," "Kartan") grounds the narrative in concrete reality, making the historical account tangible and verifiable, demonstrating the historical accuracy and fulfillment of God's promises within the physical land of Canaan.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Joshua 21:32, though seemingly an administrative detail, is profoundly rich with theological significance. It stands as a testament to God's unwavering faithfulness in fulfilling His covenant promises, not only to Abraham's descendants by granting them the promised land but also to the Levites by providing for their sustenance and strategic placement throughout Israel. The establishment of cities of refuge like Kedesh reveals a core aspect of God's character as both perfectly just and boundlessly merciful, providing a legal framework that upheld the sanctity of human life while simultaneously preventing arbitrary revenge and ensuring due process. This system ensured that even in cases of accidental death, equity and compassion were extended, reflecting a divine concern for the well-being and moral order of the community. The strategic presence of Levites, distributed throughout the land, further ensured that spiritual instruction, access to God's law, and the performance of priestly duties were readily available to all tribes, thereby fostering national unity and adherence to God's covenant.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Joshua 21:32, while rooted in the ancient legal and land distribution practices of Israel, offers profound and timeless insights for contemporary believers. It serves as a powerful reminder that God is a God of meticulous order, abundant provision, unwavering justice, and boundless mercy. Just as He painstakingly arranged for the Levites' needs and provided havens for the unintentionally guilty, so too does He care for every intricate detail of our lives and offer ultimate refuge. We are called to cultivate an unshakeable trust in His perfect provision, knowing that He will faithfully meet our needs, both physical and spiritual, according to His perfect will. Furthermore, the profound concept of a "city of refuge" resonates deeply with our intrinsic human need for safety, sanctuary, and deliverance from the crushing consequences of our fallen world and our own sin. In a spiritual sense, all humanity stands as "slayers" in need of refuge, having transgressed God's holy and righteous law. This verse prompts us to thoughtfully consider where we seek our ultimate refuge today and to whom we turn when we are overwhelmed by trouble, burdened by guilt, or seeking true peace. It profoundly encourages us to embrace God's compassionate justice, which always seeks restoration, grace, and reconciliation.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what specific ways does God's meticulous provision for the Levites in this passage deepen your confidence and trust in His provision for your own life and needs?
  • How does the ancient concept of a "city of refuge" illuminate God's perfect balance of justice and mercy, and how can you practically apply this understanding to your interactions and relationships with others?
  • Considering the spiritual implications of a "city of refuge," where do you find your ultimate sanctuary and place of rest in times of distress, spiritual need, or when confronted with your own sin?

FAQ

Why were the Levites given cities instead of a tribal land inheritance?

Answer: The Levites were uniquely set apart for sacred service to the Lord, specifically for duties related to the tabernacle and later the temple. Unlike the other tribes, "the Lord God of Israel was their inheritance" (Joshua 13:33). Instead of a territorial inheritance, God commanded that they be given 48 cities scattered strategically throughout the territories of the other tribes, along with surrounding pasturelands for their livestock. This divine arrangement ensured that they could be supported by the tithes and offerings of the people and, more importantly, that spiritual instruction, judicial guidance, and priestly service were readily accessible to all Israelites, fostering national unity and adherence to God's law. This strategic distribution prevented the Levites from becoming an isolated priestly class and instead integrated them into the very fabric of the nation, serving as spiritual anchors.

What was the purpose of a "city of refuge" and how did it function?

Answer: The cities of refuge were a unique legal institution established by God's explicit command (e.g., Numbers 35:9-34). Their primary purpose was to provide a sanctuary for individuals who had unintentionally caused the death of another, protecting them from the "avenger of blood" (a relative of the deceased who had the legal right to exact vengeance). Upon reaching a city of refuge, the slayer would present their case to the elders at the city gate. If it was determined that the killing was unintentional and without malice, they would be granted asylum within the city. They were required to remain there until the death of the current high priest. This divinely ordained system prevented arbitrary blood feuds, ensured due process, and clearly distinguished between premeditated murder (which carried the death penalty) and accidental homicide, profoundly reflecting God's unwavering commitment to both justice and mercy in the administration of His law.

Was Kedesh in Galilee the only city of refuge?

Answer: No, Kedesh in Galilee was one of six cities of refuge designated by God. These cities were strategically chosen and distributed across the land to ensure accessibility for anyone needing to flee for refuge. Three were located on the west side of the Jordan River: Kedesh in Naphtali, Shechem in Ephraim, and Hebron in Judah. Three were located on the east side of the Jordan: Bezer in Reuben, Ramoth-Gilead in Gad, and Golan in Manasseh. This comprehensive network of cities is described in Joshua 20:7-8, ensuring that refuge was available to all Israelites regardless of their tribal location.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Joshua 21:32, with its specific focus on Kedesh as a city of refuge, powerfully prefigures and foreshadows the ultimate, perfect, and eternal refuge found in Jesus Christ. Just as the ancient Israelite slayer fled to a designated city for protection from the avenger of blood, so too do those guilty of sin find their ultimate sanctuary, salvation, and deliverance in Christ. The entire Mosaic Law, including the intricate system of cities of refuge, served as a "tutor to bring us to Christ, that we might be justified by faith" (Galatians 3:24). Jesus is our true and eternal High Priest, whose sacrificial death on the cross, unlike the temporary reprieve offered by the death of the Old Covenant high priest, provides eternal freedom from the condemnation and power of sin for all who "flee for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us" (Hebrews 6:18). He is the sinless Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, offering not merely protection from an earthly avenger but complete deliverance from divine wrath and eternal death. In Christ, we encounter the perfect convergence of divine justice and boundless mercy, as He bore the full penalty for our sins, thereby becoming our ultimate "city of refuge" where forgiveness, peace, and eternal life are found for all who believe and trust in Him (Romans 8:1).

Copy as

Commentary on Joshua 21 verses 9–42

We have here a particular account of the cities which were given to the children of Levi out of the several tribes, not only to be occupied and inhabited by them, as tenants to the several tribes in which they lay - no, their interest in them was not dependent and precarious, but to be owned and possessed by them as lords and proprietors, and as having the same title to them that the rest of the tribes had to their cities or lands, as appears by the law which preserved the house in the Levites' cities from being alienated any longer than till the year of jubilee, Lev 25:32, Lev 25:33. Yet it is probable that the Levites having only the cities and suburbs, while the land about pertained to the tribes in which they lay, those of that tribe, for the convenience of occupying that land, might commonly rent houses of the Levites, as they could spare them in their cities, and so live among them as their tenants. Several things may be observed in this account, besides what was observed in the law concerning it, Num. 35.

I. That the Levites were dispersed into all the tribes, and not suffered to live all together in any one part of the country. This would find them all with work, and employ them all for the good of others; for ministers, of all people, must neither be idle nor live to themselves or to one another only. Christ left his twelve disciples together in a body, but left orders that they should in due time disperse themselves, that they might preach the gospel to every creature. The mixing of the Levites thus with the other tribes would be an obligation upon them to walk circumspectly, and as became their sacred function, and to avoid every thing that might disgrace it. Had they lived all together, they would have been tempted to wink at one another's faults, and to excuse one another when they did amiss; but by this means they were made to see the eyes of all Israel upon them, and therefore saw it their concern to walk so as that their ministry might in nothing be blamed nor their high character suffer by their ill carriage.

II. That every tribe of Israel was adorned and enriched with its share of Levites' cities in proportion to its compass, even those that lay most remote. They were all God's people, and therefore they all had Levites among them. 1. To show kindness to, as God appointed them, Deu 12:19; Deu 14:29. They were God's receivers, to whom the people might give their grateful acknowledgments of God's goodness, as the occasion and disposition were. 2. To receive advice and instruction from; when they could not go up to the tabernacle, to consult those who attended there, they might go to a Levites' city, and be taught the good knowledge of the Lord. Thus God set up a candle in every room of his house, to give light to all his family; as those that attended the altar kept the charge of the Lord, to see that no divine appointment was neglected there, so those that were scattered in the country had their charge too, which was to see that no idolatrous superstitious usages were introduced at a distance and to watch for the souls of God's Israel. Thus did God graciously provide for the keeping up of religion among them, and that they might have the word nigh them; yet, blessed be God, we, under the gospel, have it yet nigher, not only Levites in every county, but Levites in every parish, whose office it is still to teach the people knowledge, and to go before them in the things of God.

III. That there were thirteen cities, and those some of the best, appointed for the priests, the sons of Aaron, Jos 21:19. Aaron left but two sons, Eleazar and Ithamar, yet his family was now so much increased, and it was foreseen that it would in process of time grow so numerous, as to replenish all these cities, though a considerable number must of necessity be resident wherever the ark and the altar were. We read in both Testaments of such numbers of priests that we may suppose none of all the families of Israel that came out of Egypt increased afterwards so much as that of Aaron did; and the promise afterwards to the house of Aaron is, God shall increase you more and more, you and your children, Psa 115:12, Psa 115:14. He will raise up a seed to serve him.

IV. That some of the Levites' cities were afterwards famous upon other accounts. Hebron was the city in which David began his reign, and in Manhanaim, another Levites' city (Jos 21:38), he lay, and had his headquarters when he fled from Absalom. The first Israelite that ever wore the title of king (namely, Abimelech, the son of Gideon) reigned in Shechem, another Levites' city, Jos 21:21.

V. That the number of them in all was more than of most of the tribes, except Judah, though the tribe of Levi was one of the least of the tribes, to show how liberal God is, and his people should be, to his ministers; yet the disproportion will not appear so great as at first it seems, if we consider that the Levites had cities only with their suburbs to dwell in, but the rest of the tribes, besides their cities (and those perhaps were many more than are named in the account of their lot), had many unwalled towns and villages which they inhabited, besides country houses.

Upon the whole, it appears that effectual care was taken that the Levites should live both comfortably and usefully: and those, whether ministers or others, for whom Providence has done well, must look upon themselves as obliged thereby to do good, and, according as their capacity and opportunity are, to serve their generation.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 9–42. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Joshua 21:32 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.