See on the biblical-era map
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Joshua 13:7–33. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Here we have, I. Orders given to Joshua to assign to each tribe its portion of this land, including that which was yet unsubdued, which must be brought into the lot, in a believing confidence that it should be conquered when Israel was multiplied so as to have occasion for it (Jos 13:7): Now divide this land. Joshua thought all must be conquered before any must be divided. "No," said, God, "there is as much conquered as will serve your turn for the present; divide this, and make your best of it, and wait for the remainder hereafter." Note, We must take the comfort of what we have, though we cannot compass all we would have. Observe,
1.The land must be divided among the several tribes, and they must not always live in common, as now they did. Which way soever a just property is acquired, it is the will of that God who has given the earth to the children of men that there should be such a thing, and that every man should know his own, and not invade that which is another's. The world must be governed, not by force, but right, by the law of equity, not of arms.
2.That it must be divided for an inheritance, though they got it by conquest.
(1.)The promise of it came to them as an inheritance from their fathers; the land of promise pertained to the children of promise, who were thus beloved for their fathers' sakes, and in performance of the covenant with them.
(2.)The possession of it was to be transmitted by them, as an inheritance to their children. Frequently, what is got by force is soon lost again; but Israel, having an incontestable title to this land by the divine grant, might see it hereby secured as an inheritance to their seed after them, and that God kept this mercy for thousands.
3.That Joshua must not divide it by his own will. Though he was a very wise, just, and good man, it must not be left to him to give what he pleased to each tribe; but he must do it by lot, which referred the matter wholly to God, and to his determination, for he it is that appoints the bounds of our habitation, and every man's judgment must proceed from him. But Joshua must preside in this affair, must manage this solemn appeal to Providence, and see that the lot was drawn fairly and without fraud, and that every tribe did acquiesce in it. The lot indeed causeth contention to cease, Pro 18:18. But, if upon this lot any controversy should arise, Joshua by his wisdom and authority must determine it, and prevent any ill consequences of it. Joshua must have the honour of dividing the land,
(1.)Because he had undergone the fatigue of conquering it: and when, through his hand, each tribe received its allotment, they would thereby be made the more sensible of their obligations to him. And what a pleasure must it needs be to a man of such a public spirit as Joshua was to see the people that were so dear to him eating of the labour of his hands!
(2.)That he might be herein a type of Christ, who has not only conquered for us the gates of hell, but has opened to us the gates of heaven, and, having purchased the eternal inheritance for all believers, will in due time put them all in possession of it.
II.An account is here given of the distribution of the land on the other side Jordan among the Reubenites, and Gadites, and half the tribe of Manasseh. Observe,
1.How this account is introduced. It comes in,
(1.)As the reason why this land within Jordan must be divided only to the nine tribes and a half, because the other two and a half were already provided for.
(2.)As a pattern to Joshua in the work he had now to do. He had seen Moses distribute that land, which would give him some aid in distributing this, and thence he might take his measure; only this was to be done by lot, but it should seem Moses did that himself, according to the wisdom given unto him.
(3.)As an inducement to Joshua to hasten the dividing of this land, that the nine tribes and a half might not be kept any longer than was necessary out of their possession, since their brethren of the two tribes and a half were so well settled in theirs; and God their common Father would not have such a difference made between his children.
2.The particulars of this account.
(1.)Here is a general description of the country that was given to the two tribes and a half, which Moses gave them, even as Moses gave them, Jos 13:8. The repetition implies a ratification of the grant by Joshua. Moses settled this matter, and, as Moses settled it, so shall it rest; Joshua will not, under any pretence whatsoever, go about to alter it. And a reason is intimated why he would not, because Moses was the servant of the Lord, and acted in this matter by secret direction from him and was faithful as a servant. Here we have,
[1.]The fixing of the boundaries of this country, by which they were divided from the neighbouring nations, Jos 13:9, etc. Israel must know their own and keep to it, and may not, under pretence of their being God's peculiar people, encroach upon their neighbours, and invade their rights and properties, to which they had a good and firm title by providence, though not, as Israel, a title by promise.
[2.]An exception of one part of this country from Israel's possession, though it was in their grant, namely, the Geshurites and the Maachathites, Jos 13:13. They had not leisure to reduce all the remote and obscure corners of the country in Moses's time, and afterwards they had no mind to it, being easy with what they had. Thus those who are not straitened in God's promises are yet straitened in their own faith, and prayers, and endeavours.
(2.)A very particular account of the inheritances of these two tribes and a half, how they were separated from each other, and what cites, with the towns, villages, and fields, commonly known and reputed to be appurtenances to them, belonged to each tribe. This is very fully and exactly set down in order that posterity might, in reading this history, be the more affected with the goodness of God to their ancestors, when they found what a large and fruitful country, and what abundance of great and famous cities, he put them in possession of (God's grants look best when we descend to the particulars); and also that the limits of every tribe being punctually set down in this authentic record disputes might be prevented, and such contests between the tribes as commonly happen where boundaries have not been adjusted nor this matter brought to a certainty. And we have reason to think that the register here prescribed and published of the lot of each tribe was of great use to Israel in after-ages, was often appealed to, and always acquiesced in, for the determining of meum and tuum - mine and thine.
[1.]We have here the lot of the tribe of Reuben, Jacob's first-born, who, though he had lost the dignity and power which pertained to the birthright, yet, it seems, had the advantage of being first served. Perhaps those of that tribe had an eye to this in desiring to be seated on that side Jordan, that, since they could not expect the benefit of the best lot, they might have the credit of the first. Observe, First, In the account of the lot of this tribe mention is made of the slaughter, 1. Of Sihon, king of the Amorites, who reigned in this country, and might have kept it and his life if he would have been neighbourly, and have suffered Israel to pass through his territories, but, by attempting to oppose them, justly brought ruin upon himself, Num 21:21, etc. 2. Of the princes of Midian, who were slain afterwards in another war (Num 31:8), and yet are here called dukes of Sihon, and are said to be smitten with him, because they were either tributaries to him, or, in his opposition to Israel, confederates with him, and hearty in his interests, and his fall made way for theirs not long after. 3. Of Balaam particularly, that would, if he could, have cursed Israel, and was soon after recompensed according to the wickedness of his endeavour (Psa 28:4), for he fell with those that set him on. This was recorded before (Num 31:8), and is here repeated, because the defeating of Balaam's purpose to curse Israel was the turning of that curse into a blessing, and was such an instance of the power and goodness of God as was fit to be had in everlasting remembrance. See Mic 6:5. Secondly, Within the lot of this tribe was that Mount Pisgah from the top of which Moses took his view of the earthly Canaan and his flight to the heavenly. And not far off thence Elijah was when he was fetched up to heaven in a chariot of fire. The separation of this tribe from the rest, by the river Jordan, was that which Deborah lamented; and the preference they gave to their private interests above the public was what she censured, Jdg 5:15, Jdg 5:16. In this tribe lay Heshbon and Sibmah, famed for their fruitful fields and vineyards. See Isa 16:8, Isa 16:9; Jer 48:32. This tribe, with that of Gad, was sorely shaken by Hazael king of Syria (Kg2 10:33), and afterwards dislodged and carried into captivity, twenty years before the general captivity of the ten tribes by the king of Assyria, Ch1 5:26.
[2.]The lot of the tribe of Gad, Jos 13:24-28. This lay north of Reuben's lot; the country of Gilead lay in this tribe, so famous for its balm that it is thought strange indeed if there be no balm in Gilead, and the cities of Jabesh-Gilead and Ramoth-Gilead which we often read of in scripture. Succoth and Penuel, which we read of in the story of Gideon, were in this tribe; and that forest which is called the wood of Ephraim (from the slaughter Jephthah made there of the Ephraimites), in which Absalom's rebellious army was beaten, while his father David lay at Mahanaim, one of the frontier-cities of this tribe, Jos 13:26. Sharon, famous for roses, was in this tribe. And within the limits of this tribe lived those Gadarenes that loved their swine better than their Saviour, fitter to be called Girgashites than Israelites.
[3.]The lot of the half-tribe of Manasseh, Jos 13:29-31. Bashan, the kingdom of Og, was in this allotment, famous for the best timber, witness the oaks of Bashan - and the best breed of cattle, witness the bulls and rams of Bashan. This tribe lay north of Gad, reached to Mount Hermon, and had in it part of Gilead. Mispeh was in this half-tribe, and Jephthah was one of its ornaments; so was Elijah, for in this tribe was Thisbe, whence he is called the Tishbite; and Jair was another. In the edge of the tribe stood Chorazin, honoured with Christ's wondrous works, but ruined by his righteous woe for not improving them.
[4.]Twice in this chapter it is taken notice of that to the tribe of Levi Moses gave no inheritance (Jos 13:14, Jos 13:33), for so God had appointed, Num 18:20. If they had been appointed to a lot entire by themselves, Moses would have served them first, not because it was his own tribe, but because it was God's; but they must be provided for in another manner; their habitations must be scattered in all the tribes, and their maintenance brought out of all the tribes, and God himself was the portion both of their inheritance and of their cup, Deu 10:9; Deu 18:2.
Continue studying Joshua 13:22 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.



Summary
Joshua 13:22 serves as a concise yet potent parenthetical note within the detailed account of Israel's tribal land allotments, specifically during the description of Reuben's inheritance. This verse unequivocally confirms the ultimate and divinely ordained demise of Balaam, the infamous soothsayer from Pethor, at the hands of the Israelites. It underscores the principle of divine justice and the thoroughness of Israel's conquest, ensuring that even those who sought to undermine God's people through spiritual deception and wicked counsel would face ultimate retribution.
Context
Literary Context
This verse appears as a striking parenthetical interjection within the otherwise meticulous geographical and tribal descriptions of the land east of the Jordan, specifically the territory allocated to the tribe of Reuben. The surrounding verses detail the boundaries, cities, and inhabitants of Reuben's inheritance, making the sudden mention of Balaam's death a deliberate and significant disruption to the administrative tone. Its placement here, rather than in a more direct narrative of conquest, emphasizes that Balaam's demise was a settled fact, integral to the completion of Israel's initial victories and the secure establishment of their claim to the land, even as they divided it. It serves as a final, definitive statement on a figure whose influence extended beyond mere military opposition, cementing his fate within the broader narrative of Israel's triumph.
Historical & Cultural Context
The historical backdrop is the culmination of Israel's conquest of the Transjordanian territories, particularly the defeat of Sihon, king of the Amorites, and Og, king of Bashan, and the subsequent war against the Midianites. Balaam's involvement, as detailed in Numbers 22, occurred prior to this final phase of the Midianite war, where his counsel led to the egregious sin at Peor (Numbers 31:16). Culturally, the term "soothsayer" (Hebrew: qosem) places Balaam firmly within the pagan traditions of divination, which were strictly forbidden by Yahweh to Israel (Deuteronomy 18:10-12). His death, therefore, represents not merely the elimination of a military adversary but the eradication of a profound spiritual threat and a clear demonstration of God's judgment against those who practice such dark arts and seek to corrupt His people.
Key Themes
Joshua 13:22 powerfully reinforces several key themes prevalent throughout the book of Joshua and the Pentateuch. Firstly, it highlights Divine Justice, demonstrating that God's retribution is comprehensive and inescapable, even for those who possess spiritual insight but use it for wicked ends. Balaam's death underscores the principle that sin, particularly that which leads God's people astray, will be met with severe consequences. Secondly, it speaks to God's Sovereignty and Protection of Israel. Despite Balaam's persistent attempts to curse Israel and his later success in tempting them to sin, God's ultimate plan for His people could not be thwarted. His demise signifies the removal of a persistent spiritual enemy, ensuring Israel's purity and security in the promised land, a land cleansed of such corrupting influences. This act solidifies the narrative of God's faithfulness to His covenant promises, even in the face of spiritual opposition.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This term is highly significant, distinguishing Balaam from a true prophet of Yahweh. A qâçam is a diviner, one who practices forbidden arts of divination, augury, or magic to gain knowledge or influence events, often for personal gain. While Balaam did receive genuine revelations from God (e.g., Numbers 23:8), his fundamental identity and practice remained rooted in pagan divination, which was an abomination to the Lord (Deuteronomy 18:10-12). His title here emphasizes his spiritual opposition to God's ways, despite his occasional, divinely compelled pronouncements of blessing upon Israel. His death, therefore, is not merely a military casualty but a divine judgment against a practitioner of forbidden arts who sought to undermine God's people.
This verb denotes a decisive act of killing, often with intent and finality. In the context of holy war, as seen throughout Joshua, "slaying" enemies like Balaam signifies not merely a military victory but the execution of divine judgment against those who stand in opposition to God's people and His covenant purposes. It underscores the severity of the retribution meted out by Israel, acting as God's instrument to cleanse the land and secure their inheritance.
This participle describes the state of being "pierced" or "mortally wounded," often with the implication of being defiled or profaned. Balaam is numbered "among them that were slain," indicating that his death was not an isolated incident but part of a larger, comprehensive purge of those who had become an abomination to God and a threat to Israel's purity and inheritance. His being "slain" confirms the complete and irreversible nature of his demise as a consequence of his actions, marking him as one who fell under God's righteous judgment.
Verse Breakdown
"Balaam also the son of Beor, the soothsayer,"
This opening clause immediately identifies the infamous figure, emphasizing his lineage and, crucially, his professional identity as a "soothsayer." The inclusion of "also" (Hebrew: gam) links his death to the broader context of those slain during the conquest, yet his specific mention highlights his unique notoriety and the significance of his demise. The title "soothsayer" is not merely descriptive but condemnatory, marking him as an enemy of Yahweh's covenant people due to his illicit spiritual practices and his counsel that led Israel into sin.
"did the children of Israel slay with the sword"
This phrase directly attributes Balaam's death to the Israelites, specifically "the children of Israel," underscoring that this was a divinely sanctioned act of judgment carried out by God's chosen people. The instrument, "the sword," signifies a decisive and violent end, consistent with the nature of holy war and the eradication of those who stood in opposition to God's will for Israel's settlement in the land. This confirms the fulfillment of the command to utterly destroy enemies who threatened Israel's spiritual and physical integrity, particularly those who sought to corrupt them from within.
"among them that were slain by them."
This concluding phrase integrates Balaam's death into the larger narrative of the conquest, specifically the punitive war against the Midianites, as detailed in Numbers 31. It confirms that Balaam was not merely a casualty of circumstance but was specifically targeted and executed as part of the comprehensive judgment against those who had conspired against Israel and led them into sin. His inclusion among "them that were slain" underscores the thoroughness of God's justice and the complete victory granted to Israel over all their adversaries, both military and spiritual.
Literary Devices
Joshua 13:22 employs several potent literary devices that amplify its theological significance. The most prominent is its Parenthetical Insertion, where the verse abruptly interrupts the detailed geographical description of Reuben's inheritance. This unexpected interjection serves to highlight the exceptional significance of Balaam's demise, ensuring that his fate is explicitly noted as a completed aspect of the conquest, rather than being lost in the broader narrative of the Midianite war. This placement also creates a subtle Irony: a figure who once sought to curse Israel and later led them into spiritual compromise ultimately falls by the very people he sought to harm. Furthermore, the verse functions as a powerful statement of Divine Judgment, serving as a definitive closure to Balaam's narrative arc in the Pentateuch and Joshua. His death is not merely a historical fact but a theological declaration of God's unwavering justice against those who oppose His will and corrupt His people, reinforcing the theme of Israel's purification of the land.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Joshua 13:22 serves as a crucial theological marker, confirming the definitive end of a figure who embodied both prophetic insight and profound spiritual corruption. Balaam's story, stretching from his initial inability to curse Israel to his later counsel leading to the sin at Peor, highlights the enduring tension between divine revelation and human depravity driven by greed. His death at the hands of the Israelites underscores the principle of divine justice, demonstrating that even those who appear to possess spiritual power cannot escape God's judgment when they actively oppose His purposes and seek to lead His people astray. This verse acts as a final, emphatic statement that God's covenant people are protected, and their enemies, both spiritual and physical, will ultimately be vanquished, solidifying God's unwavering commitment to His covenant.
Reflection and Application
Joshua 13:22, though brief, offers profound lessons for believers today. It serves as a stark reminder that divine justice is ultimately inescapable, even for those who might appear to operate with spiritual gifts or knowledge but whose hearts are corrupted by greed and a desire to compromise God's truth. Balaam's story is a timeless warning against using spiritual influence for selfish gain or leading others into sin. For us, it underscores the importance of spiritual discernment, guarding against false teachers and deceptive doctrines that subtly encourage compromise with worldly values or idolatry. We are called to stand firm in our faith, recognizing that God is sovereign over all opposition, and His purposes for His people will prevail. Our commitment must be to purity and obedience, not to the pursuit of gain through unholy means. This verse also offers comfort, assuring us that God will ultimately deal with those who seek to harm His church or lead believers astray, reinforcing our trust in His protective hand and His righteous judgment.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why is Balaam's death mentioned here, seemingly out of place in a list of land allotments?
Balaam's death is mentioned in Joshua 13:22 as a parenthetical note within the description of the land allotted to the tribe of Reuben. Its placement, though seemingly abrupt, serves several important purposes. Firstly, it provides a definitive closure to the narrative of Balaam, confirming that this notorious figure, who had sought to curse Israel and later led them into sin at Peor (Numbers 31:16), was indeed among those justly slain by Israel. This ensures that readers understand his fate was sealed as part of God's judgment against Israel's enemies. Secondly, it emphasizes the thoroughness of Israel's conquest and the eradication of all significant threats, both military and spiritual, from the land. His death is not just a historical detail but a theological statement about the purity required for Israel's inheritance and the triumph of God's will over spiritual opposition. It underscores that even as the land is being divided, the spiritual landscape has been cleansed of such corrupting influences, signaling a complete victory.
What was Balaam's primary sin that led to his death?
While Balaam initially could not curse Israel because God prevented him (Numbers 22), his primary sin that ultimately led to his demise was his wicked counsel to Balak, the king of Moab. As recorded in Numbers 31:16, Balaam advised Balak to entice the Israelites into idolatry and sexual immorality through the Midianite women at Peor. This counsel led to a devastating plague among Israel, resulting in 24,000 deaths (Numbers 25:1-9). Balaam's motivation was likely greed, as he sought to gain favor and reward from Balak despite being unable to directly curse Israel. His death in Joshua 13:22 and Numbers 31:8 is presented as divine retribution for this malicious and spiritually destructive counsel, which directly caused great harm to God's people and violated their covenant purity.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The demise of Balaam, the soothsayer, in Joshua 13:22 foreshadows the ultimate triumph of Christ over all spiritual opposition and deceptive forces. Balaam, though possessing a form of spiritual insight, was ultimately a false prophet driven by greed, seeking to undermine God's people through compromise and corruption. In stark contrast, Jesus Christ is the true Prophet (Deuteronomy 18:15), who perfectly speaks God's word and never leads His people astray. While Balaam's counsel led to death and defilement for Israel, Christ's counsel leads to life and purification for His church (Ephesians 5:25-27). Balaam's end signifies God's judgment against those who pervert spiritual truth for gain, a judgment fully realized in Christ's decisive victory over sin, death, and the devil (Colossians 2:15). Just as Israel was cleansed of Balaam's corrupting influence to inherit the promised land, so too does Christ purify His people, enabling them to inherit the eternal kingdom, free from the "doctrine of Balaam" and every other deceitful teaching (Revelation 2:14; John 8:32). His cross and resurrection are the ultimate "slaying with the sword" of all spiritual enemies, securing the inheritance for His redeemed by His own perfect obedience and sacrifice.