Skip to content
Share this page

John 9:3

“The Healing of a Man Born Blind”John 9:1–7

King James Version
Jesus answered, Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents: but that the works of God should be made manifest in him.

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
Jesus G2424 answered G611, Neither G3777 hath G264 this man G3778 sinned G264, nor G3777 his G846 parents G1118: but G235 that G2443 the works G2041 of God G2316 should be made manifest G5319 in G1722 him G846.

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
Jesus answered, “Neither this man nor his parents sinned, but this happened so that the works of God would be displayed in him.

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
Jesus answered, Neither did this man sin, nor his parents: but that the works of God should be made manifest in him.

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
Yeshua answered, “Neither did this man sin, nor his parents; but, that the works of God might be revealed in him.

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
Iesus answered, Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents, but that the workes of God should be shewed on him.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
Jesus answered, `Neither did this one sin nor his parents, but that the works of God may be manifested in him;

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
19 Greek words
  1. ἈπεκρίθηApekrithēAnsweredG611V-ADI-3SVerb Aorist Middle Deponent Indicative 3rd Singular
  2. ὁho[the]G3588T-NSMDefinite article Nominative Singular Masculine
  3. Ἰησοῦς·IēsousJesusG2424N-NSM-PNoun Nominative Singular Masculine Individual
  4. οὔτεouteNeitherG3777CONJ-NConjunction Negative
  5. οὗτοςhoutosthis [man]G3778D-NSMDemonstrative pronoun Nominative Singular Masculine
  6. ἥμαρτενhēmartensinnedG264V-2AAI-3SVerb 2nd Aorist Active Indicative 3rd Singular
  7. οὔτεoutenor [sinned]G3777CONJ-NConjunction Negative
  8. οἱhoitheG3588T-NPMDefinite article Nominative Plural Masculine
  9. γονεῖςgoneisparentsG1118N-NPMNoun Nominative Plural Masculine
  10. αὐτοῦautouof himG846P-GSMPersonal pronoun Genitive Singular Masculine
  11. ἀλλ᾽all᾽butG235CONJConjunction
  12. ἵναina[it was] thatG2443CONJConjunction
  13. φανερωθῇphanerōthēamay be displayedG5319V-APS-3SVerb Aorist Passive Subjunctive 3rd Singular
  14. τὰtatheG3588T-NPNDefinite article Nominative Plural Neuter
  15. ἔργαergaworksG2041N-NPNNoun Nominative Plural Neuter
  16. τοῦtou[the]G3588T-GSMDefinite article Genitive Singular Masculine
  17. θεοῦtheouof GodG2316N-GSM-TNoun Genitive Singular Masculine Title
  18. ἐνeninG1722PREPPreposition
  19. αὐτῷautōhimG846P-DSMPersonal pronoun Dative Singular Masculine
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
All John Sites (Jerusalem)
All John Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
Jesus' Third Journey from Galilee to Jerusalem
Jesus' Third Journey from Galilee to Jerusalem View full PDF
All John Sites (Levant)
All John Sites (Levant) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 26,444 of 31,102 · 85.0%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

Jesus clears the man and his parents of causing the blindness and says it is there so that God’s works will be shown openly in him.

“Jesus answered,”

He answers their question directly and then goes further than they asked.

“Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents:”

Jesus clears both of causing this blindness. His words speak to the cause of this one affliction.

“but that the works of God should be made manifest in him.”

The man’s life becomes the place where God’s works are seen. The healing in verses 6 and 7 is the first of them, and his bold witness later in the chapter is another.

Passage studyJohn 9:1–7

Jesus Gives Sight to a Man Born Blind

1And as Jesus passed by, he saw a man which was blind from his birth. 2And his disciples asked him, saying, Master, who did sin, this man, or his parents, that he was born blind? 3Jesus answered, Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents: but that the works of God should be made manifest in him. 4I must work the works of him that sent me, while it is day: the night cometh, when no man can work. 5As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world. 6When he had thus spoken, he spat on the ground, and made clay of the spittle, and he anointed the eyes of the blind man with the clay, 7And said unto him, Go, wash in the pool of Siloam, (which is by interpretation, Sent.) He went his way therefore, and washed, and came seeing.

Summary

As Jesus leaves the temple, he sees a man who has been blind since birth. His disciples ask whose sin caused it, the man’s or his parents’. Jesus answers that the blindness is there so that the works of God may be shown in him, and he says he must do the works of the Father who sent him while the day lasts, for he is the light of the world. Then he spits on the ground, makes clay, spreads it on the man’s eyes and sends him to wash in the pool of Siloam, a name that means Sent. The man goes, washes and comes back seeing. In these seven verses we meet a Saviour who notices the overlooked, who turns a question about blame into a lesson about God’s purpose, and who gives sight to eyes that had been dark from birth.

Jesus sees a man blind from his birth

The chapter follows straight on from a confrontation in the temple. At the close of John 8 Jesus told the leaders, “Before Abraham was, I am” (John 8:58), and they took up stones to throw at him, so he “hid himself, and went out of the temple” (John 8:59). From that heated argument John takes us to a quiet meeting with one suffering man. The miracle that follows is one of the signs that show who Jesus is, and it opens the long debate about sight and blindness that fills the rest of John 9.

Jesus takes the first step here, before the man has said a word. The verb for saw, eídō, means properly to see, with the eyes or with the mind, and the story shows what this seeing led to. Jesus looks at a man whom others passed every day, and he stops for him. Later in the chapter we learn that the man sat and begged, the usual way for the blind to survive, and people with his condition were often overlooked and thought to stand outside God’s favour. Jesus’ attention to him is a picture of the Good Shepherd, who goes looking for the lost.

The word for blind, typhlós, means unable to see, and in a figure unable to understand, and before the chapter ends John uses it both ways. “From his birth” (ek genetḗs, from genetḗ, birth or origin) tells us that this man had lived his whole life in darkness. Jesus will give him sight he had lacked from the start, which makes this healing a work of creation as well as a cure, and it was a thing unheard of. The same detail raises the question the disciples ask next.

Who sinned, this man or his parents?

The disciples ask (erōtáō, to ask a question or to make a request) and address Jesus as “Master”, which in Greek is rhabbí, the title of a teacher. They want his answer on a matter that troubled many in their day. It was widely held that suffering, and especially a defect present from birth, was God’s punishment for a particular sin. People drew this from the law’s blessings for obedience and curses for disobedience (Deuteronomy 28) and from God’s warning that he visits “the iniquity of the fathers upon the children” (Exodus 20:5). The Old Testament does show sin bringing judgment, and the mistake lay in reading every person’s suffering as the sign of some sin of their own.

The verb hamartánō, to sin, means properly to miss the mark, and so to go wrong, especially in a moral sense. A man born blind made the question hard, and the verb gennáō, to be born, keeps that fact in front of us. If the man himself was to blame, he must have sinned before he was born, and some rabbis did discuss whether a child could sin in the womb. Jacob and Esau struggling in Rebekah’s womb (Genesis 25:22–23) was sometimes brought into such talk, although Genesis calls it a struggle. The other choice was the more common explanation, that the parents’ sin was being visited on their child.

People ask whether the disciples were thinking of reincarnation or of a soul that lived before birth. Their two choices match the usual explanations of their day, sin in the womb or sin passed down from parents. Some mystical traditions and later schools of thought entertained ideas of a life before birth, but they had little place in the mainstream teaching of Jesus’ time.

The question also shows how the belief worked in ordinary life. The disciples discuss the man in front of him as a case to be explained, and the thought of healing him has yet to come up. Belief of that kind led people to judge the afflicted when they should have been helping them. Job’s friends reasoned in the same way about Job, and the LORD rebuked them for it (Job 42:7). Jesus met the same reasoning when he was told about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mingled with their sacrifices (Luke 13:2), and he turned his hearers to their own need of repentance (Luke 13:1–5).

The works of God made manifest in him

Jesus answers (apokrínom, to answer, or simply to begin speaking) by setting both of the disciples’ choices aside: “Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents.” His words concern what caused this blindness, and he clears both the man and his parents of it. Then comes the word “but” (allá), and with it the purpose: “that the works of God should be made manifest in him.” The noun érgon means a work or deed, and here it is God’s own active deeds of power. The verb phaneróō means to make apparent, to show openly. What the neighbours took for a mark of God’s judgment was the very place where his power would be shown for all to see.

So the question changes from why the man suffers to what God will do through it. Jesus says something similar about Lazarus, whose sickness was “for the glory of God” (John 11:4). God may permit hardship or bring it about for purposes of his own, and he can turn what looks like a tragedy into an occasion for his glory. Paul learned this when the Lord told him, “My grace is sufficient for thee: for my strength is made perfect in weakness” (2 Corinthians 12:9–10). He could write from prison that his troubles “have fallen out rather unto the furtherance of the gospel” (Philippians 1:12), and he assures us that “all things work together for good to them that love God” (Romans 8:28).

Does sin ever cause suffering?

Sin does bring suffering, to people and to whole communities, and Scripture says plainly that “the wages of sin is death” (Romans 6:23). What Jesus corrects here is the habit of tracing every affliction back to one particular sin. Some suffering is the fruit of sin, and some, like this man’s blindness, is the place where God means to show his works. That should make us slow to blame anyone for what they suffer, and quick to look for what God is doing.

I must work while it is day

“I must” translates deî, a word of necessity. The works are laid on Jesus by the one who sent him, and doing them is his whole purpose. The verb ergázomai means to work or labour, and also simply to do or perform, and the “works” are the same works of God named in verse 3: all his deeds, his teaching and his miracles. In John, Jesus speaks again and again of “him that sent me”. He does what he sees the Father do (John 5:19), he came down from heaven to do the will of the one who sent him (John 6:38), and his meat is “to do the will of him that sent me, and to finish his work” (John 4:34). In Luke he speaks with the same resolve about his road to Jerusalem: “I must walk to day, and to morrow, and the day following” (Luke 13:32–33).

The word hēméra is day, the time between dawn and dark, and nýx is night, the time between sunset and sunrise. Day and night were familiar pictures of the time for activity and the time for rest, and Jesus uses them for his own life. The day is the time of his public ministry, when the works of God can be done openly and seen. The night that is coming is his arrest, trial, crucifixion and burial, when that public work among the people comes to an end, and the words “no man can work” stress how complete that end would be. So the time is short and the work is urgent. He says much the same later: “Walk while ye have the light, lest darkness come upon you” (John 12:35).

The night did come, and in it the Son did the greatest work of all. The darkness of Gethsemane, Calvary and the tomb looked like the end, yet there he bore sin and overcame death, and his resurrection began a new day. His work goes on through his people by the Spirit, as he promised: “He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also” (John 14:12). He sends them to make disciples of all nations, with his promise to be with them always (Matthew 28:19–20).

Does this verse apply to us? Its first meaning belongs to Jesus’ own mission, and its principle reaches every believer. Our day is the span of our earthly life, and our night will come, for “it is appointed unto men once to die” (Hebrews 9:27). Health can fail and doors of service can close sooner than that. So we are to be “redeeming the time” (Ephesians 5:16), doing the work God gives us while we can.

The light of the world

“As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world.” Jesus first said this in the temple (John 8:12), at the time of the Feast of Tabernacles, when great lamps were lit in the temple courts as a sign of God’s guiding presence. Now he is about to show it by giving a blind man light.

The word phōs, light, covers both the light we see by and the light of truth, goodness and life. In Scripture light goes with God’s presence and his word: “Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path” (Psalm 119:105). Here the light is a person, Jesus himself. John opened his Gospel the same way: “In him was life; and the life was the light of men” (John 1:4–5). Jesus says later, “I am come a light into the world, that whosoever believeth on me should not abide in darkness” (John 12:46), and John writes that “God is light, and in him is no darkness at all” (1 John 1:5). Isaiah had foretold it: “The people that walked in darkness have seen a great light” (Isaiah 9:2).

The world, kósmos, can mean the whole created order, and in John it often means mankind as it is, fallen and estranged from God. So the light of the world shines for all people, to rescue them from their darkness, as the Gospel says in “God so loved the world” (John 3:16–19). The same passage warns that light brings judgment as well, because “men loved darkness rather than light”. To those willing to see, it brings grace and sight.

The verb eimí, “I am”, is the ordinary verb “to be”. It is used of passing states as well as lasting ones, and in “as long as I am in the world” it describes his time on earth. The weight of the saying lies in what Jesus says he is. The same verb carries his words at the close of the previous chapter, “Before Abraham was, I am” (John 8:58), which take up the name God gave Moses, “I AM THAT I AM” (Exodus 3:14).

“As long as I am in the world” marks the time of his life on earth, which would end in his death, resurrection and ascension. His light still shines after it. The Spirit of truth guides his people “into all truth” (John 16:13), he tells his disciples, “Ye are the light of the world” (Matthew 5:14), and in the end the holy city will have “no need of the sun, neither of the moon, to shine in it: for the glory of God did lighten it, and the Lamb is the light thereof” (Revelation 21:23).

Clay on the blind man’s eyes

“When he had thus spoken” (épō, to speak or say) ties what Jesus does to what he has just said, and the light of the world now gives light to a man’s eyes. He spits (ptýō) on the ground, makes clay (pēlós) of the spittle, and anoints the man’s eyes with it. The verb epichríō, built on epí, upon, means to smear over, so the KJV’s “anointed” describes the clay being spread on the man’s eyes. Saliva was sometimes used in folk remedies in that day, for lesser ailments than blindness from birth, and making mud on the ground and putting it on a man’s eyes would have looked strange, even crude.

The clay points back to the beginning: “the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground” (Genesis 2:7). The one through whom all things were made (John 1:3, Colossians 1:16) works with the dust again and forms in this man what had been missing since his birth.

Why did Jesus use clay and spittle?

Jesus used these humble things freely, and they show several truths at once. The clay recalls God forming man from the dust, so the healing is plainly a work of the Creator. His touch shows his personal care for a man whom others overlooked. And because spittle and mud are the plainest of things, the miracle could only be credited to Jesus himself. He healed in other ways too. For the centurion’s servant a word was enough (Matthew 8:8), and he used spittle when he healed a deaf man (Mark 7:33) and a blind man at Bethsaida (Mark 8:23). Here the clay also gave the man something to do, for he had to go and wash it off.

Go, wash in the pool of Siloam

Jesus said (épō again) to the man, “Go, wash in the pool of Siloam.” The verb níptō means to wash, usually a part of the body, here the man’s eyes. Siloam was a well-known pool in Jerusalem, fed from the Gihon Spring through Hezekiah’s Tunnel. It was an important source of water for the city, especially at the festivals, and it was linked with ritual cleansing. The command sent the man to a public place, so the result would be seen and known.

John adds a note for his readers: Siloam is “by interpretation, Sent.” The Hebrew name, Shiloah, means sent or sending out, and the Greek word John uses, apostéllō, means to send out, properly on a mission. In this Gospel Jesus is the one the Father sent: “God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved” (John 3:17). Jesus speaks of “the Father which hath sent him” (John 5:23) and of doing the will of the one who sent him (John 6:38), and he says, “I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me” (John 8:42). Two verses earlier he spoke of “him that sent me”. So the man is sent to wash in a pool named Sent, at the word of the One whom God sent, and the sight he receives comes from that One.

“He went his way therefore, and washed, and came seeing.” The man obeyed before he could see anything, with clay on his eyes and only Jesus’ word to go on. “Without faith it is impossible to please him” (Hebrews 11:6). His going, his washing and his sight follow one another as simply as John tells it.

This is the start of his story. The healing was done on a Sabbath (John 9:14), and that set off the Pharisees’ questioning. The neighbours, the Pharisees and the man’s parents are all drawn in, and the man who was blind ends by confessing Jesus as the Son of God (John 9:8–38). Jesus then says, “For judgment I am come into this world, that they which see not might see; and that they which see might be made blind”, and to the Pharisees, “now ye say, We see; therefore your sin remaineth” (John 9:39–41). Isaiah had spoken of a people whose eyes were shut, “lest they see with their eyes” (Isaiah 6:10). The blind man receives his sight and comes to faith, while men with good eyes stay blind to who Jesus is.

Jesus opens the eyes of the spiritually blind

The man born blind is a picture of every one of us. We are born into spiritual darkness, unable to see God’s truth until he opens our eyes. Isaiah foretold the LORD’s chosen one, who would come “to open the blind eyes” (Isaiah 42:7), and here Jesus does it for the body as a sign of what he does for the heart. Paul says that “the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not”, and that the God who first commanded light to shine has shined in our hearts (2 Corinthians 4:4–6): “For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts” (2 Corinthians 4:6). He prays for believers, “The eyes of your understanding being enlightened” (Ephesians 1:18), and he calls, “Awake thou that sleepest, and arise from the dead, and Christ shall give thee light” (Ephesians 5:14). Peter says that God “hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light” (1 Peter 2:9).

That sight was bought at a price. The healing points ahead to the cross, where the Lamb of God took away the sin of the world (John 1:29). God “hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him” (2 Corinthians 5:21). Isaiah says of him, “Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows” (Isaiah 53:4). Christ cleanses his church “with the washing of water by the word” (Ephesians 5:26–27), so the man’s washing at Siloam is a fitting picture of the cleansing every believer receives from him. Until all things are made new, suffering still comes, and Paul tells us that “the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us” (Romans 8:18–25).

Seeing people as Jesus sees them

Jesus saw a man whom others passed by, while his disciples saw a problem to explain. When we meet someone who suffers, the question “who sinned?” comes easily, and it leaves the sufferer where he was. Jesus gives us a better question: what God means to do here, and how we can serve him in it. He counts kindness to the least of his brethren as kindness to himself: “Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me” (Matthew 25:35–40).

Our own hardships are in the same hands, and God can display his works in them as he did in this man. His word to us may be as plain and as strange as “Go, wash”, and the man shows us what to do with it: he went, and he came seeing. Our day is short, as the Lord’s was, and the works God gives us are for now, while it is day.

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers John 9:1–7. He set out his notes in a four-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 7 verses
Passage under commentJohn 9:1–7
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

We have here sight given to a poor beggar that had been blind from his birth. Observe,

I.The notice which our Lord Jesus took of the piteous case of this poor blind man (John 9:1):

As Jesus passed by he saw a man which was blind from his birth. The first words seem to refer to the last of the foregoing chapter, and countenance the opinion of those who in the harmony place this story immediately after that. There it was said, parēgen - he passed by, and here, without so much as repeating him name (though our translators supply it) kai paragō - and as he passed by. 1. Though the Jews had so basely abused him, both by word and deed gave him the highest provocation imaginable, yet he did not miss any opportunity of doing good among them, nor take up a resolution, as justly he might have done, never to have favoured them with any good offices. The cure of this blind man was a kindness to the public, enabling him to work for his living who before was a charge and burden to the neighbourhood. It is noble, and generous, and Christ-like, to be willing to serve the public, even when we are slighted and disobliged by them, or think ourselves so. Though he was in his flight from a threatening danger, and escaping for his life, yet he willingly halted and staid awhile to show mercy to this poor man. We make more haste than good speed when we out-run opportunities of doing good. 3. When the Pharisees drove Christ from them, he went to this poor blind beggar. Some of the ancients make this a figure of the bringing of the gospel to the Gentiles, who sat in darkness, when the Jews had rejected it, and driven it from them. 4. Christ took this poor blind man in his way, and cured him in transitu - as he passed by. Thus should we take occasions of doing good, even as we pass by, wherever we are.

Now, (1.) The condition of this poor man was very sad. He was blind, and had been so from his birth. If the light is sweet, how melancholy must it needs be for a man, all his days, to eat in darkness! He that is blind has no enjoyment of the light, but he that is born blind has no idea of it. Methinks such a one would give a great deal to have his curiosity satisfied with but one day's sight of light and colours, shapes and figures, though he were never to see them more. Why is the light of life given to one that is in this misery, that is deprived of the light of the sun, whose way is thus hid, and whom God hath thus hedged in? Job 3:20-23. Let us bless God that it was not our case. The eye is one of the most curious parts of the body, its structure exceedingly nice and fine. In the formation of animals, it is said to be the first part that appears distinctly discernible. What a mercy is it that there was no miscarriage in the making of ours! Christ cured many that were blind by disease or accident, but here he cured one that was born blind. [1.] That he might give an instance of his power to help in the most desperate cases, and to relieve when none else can. [2.] That he might give a specimen of the work of his grace upon the souls of sinners, which gives sight to those that were by nature blind.

(2.)The compassions of our Lord Jesus towards him were very tender. He saw him; that is, he took cognizance of his case, and looked upon him with concern. When God is about to work deliverance, he is said to see the affliction; so Christ saw this poor man. Others saw him, but not as he did. This poor man could not see Christ, but Christ saw him, and anticipated both his prayers and expectations with a surprising cure. Christ is often found of those that seek him not, nor see him, Isaiah 65:1. And, if we know or apprehend any thing of Christ, it is because we were first known of him (Galatians 4:9) and apprehended by him, Philippians 3:12.

II.The discourse between Christ and his disciples concerning this man.

When he departed out of the temple they went along with him: for these were they that continued with him in his temptations, and followed him whithersoever he went; and they lost nothing by their adherence to him, but gained experience abundantly. Observe,

1.The question which the disciples put to their Master upon this blind man's case, John 9:2. When Christ looked upon him, they had an eye to him too; Christ's compassion should kindle ours. It is probable that Christ told them this poor man was born blind, or they knew it by common fame; but they did not move Christ to heal him. Instead of this, they started a very odd question concerning him: Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind? Now this question of theirs was,

(1.)Uncharitably censorious. They take it for granted that this extraordinary calamity was the punishment of some uncommon wickedness, and that this man was a sinner above all men that dwelt at Jerusalem, Luke 13:4. For the barbarous people to infer, Surely this man is a murderer, was not so strange; but it was inexcusable in them, who knew the scriptures, who had read that all things come alike to all, and knew that it was adjudged in Job's case that the greatest sufferers are not therefore to be looked upon as the greatest sinners. The grace of repentance calls our own afflictions punishments, but the grace of charity calls the afflictions of others trials, unless the contrary is very evident.

(2.)It was unnecessarily curious. Concluding this calamity to be inflicted for some very heinous crime, they ask, Who were the criminals, this man or his parents? And what was this to them? Or what good would it do them to know it? We are apt to be more inquisitive concerning other people's sins than concerning our own; whereas, it is more our concern to know wherefore God contends with us than wherefore he contends with others; for to judge ourselves is our sin. They enquire,

[1.]Whether this man was punished thus for some sin of his own, either committed or foreseen before his birth. Some think that the disciples were tainted with the Pythagorean notion of the pre-existence of souls, and their transmigration from one body to another. Was this man's soul condemned to the dungeon of this blind body to punish it for some great sin committed in another body which it had before animated? The Pharisees seem to have had the same opinion of his case when they said, Thou wast altogether born in sin (John 9:34), as if all those, and those only, were born in sin whom nature had stigmatized. Or,

[2.]Whether he was punished for the wickedness of his parents, which God sometimes visits upon the children. It is a good reason why parents should take heed of sin, lest their children smart for it when they are gone. Let not us thus be cruel to our own, as the ostrich in the wilderness. Perhaps the disciples asked this, not as believing that this was the punishment of some actual sin of his own or his parents, but Christ having intimated to another patient that his sin was the cause of this impotency (John 5:14), "Master," say they, "whose sin is the cause of this impotency?" Being at a loss what construction to put upon this providence, they desire to be informed. The equity of God's dispensations is always certain, for his righteousness is as the great mountains, but not always to be accounted for, for his judgments are a great deep.

2.Christ's answer to this question. He was always apt to teach, and to rectify his disciples' mistakes.

(1.)He gives the reason of this poor man's blindness: "Neither has this man sinned nor his parents, but he was born blind, and has continued so to this day, that now at last the works of God should be made manifest in him," John 9:3. Here Christ, who perfectly knew the secret springs of the divine counsels, told them two things concerning such uncommon calamities: - [1.] That they are not always inflicted as punishments of sin. The sinfulness of the whole race of mankind does indeed justify God in all the miseries of human life; so that those who have the least share of them must say that God is kind, and those who have the largest share must not say that he is unjust; but many are made much more miserable than others in this life who are not at all more sinful. Not but that this man was a sinner, and his parents sinners, but is was not any uncommon guilt that God had an eye to in inflicting this upon him. Note, We must take heed of judging any to be great sinners merely because they are great sufferers, lest we be found, not only persecuting those whom God has smitten (Psalm 69:26), but accusing those whom he has justified, and condemning those for whom Christ died, which is daring and dangerous, Romans 8:33, Romans 8:34. [2.] That they are sometimes intended purely for the glory of God, and the manifesting of his works. God has a sovereignty over all his creatures and an exclusive right in them, and may make them serviceable to his glory in such a way as he thinks fit, in doing or suffering; and if God be glorified, either by us or in us, we were not made in vain. This man was born blind, and it was worth while for him to be so, and to continue thus long dark, that the works of God might be manifest in him. That is, First, That the attributes of God might be made manifest in him: his justice in making sinful man liable to such grievous calamities; his ordinary power and goodness in supporting a poor man under such a grievous and tedious affliction, especially that his extraordinary power and goodness might be manifested in curing him. Note, The difficulties of providence, otherwise unaccountable, may be resolved into this - God intends in them to show himself, to declare his glory, to make himself to be taken notice of. Those who regard him not in the ordinary course of things are sometimes alarmed by things extraordinary. How contentedly then may a good man be a loser in his comforts, while he is sure that thereby God will be one way or other a gainer in his glory! Secondly, That the counsels of God concerning the Redeemer might be manifested in him. He was born blind that our Lord Jesus might have the honour of curing him, and might therein prove himself sent of God to be the true light to the world. Thus the fall of man was permitted, and the blindness that followed it, that the works of God might be manifest in opening the eyes of the blind. It was now a great while since this man was born blind, and yet it never appeared till now why he was so. Note, The intentions of Providence commonly do not appear till a great while after the event, perhaps many years after. The sentences in the book of providence are sometimes long, and you must read a great way before you can apprehend the sense of them.

(2.)He gives the reason of his own forwardness and readiness to help and heal him, John 9:4, John 9:5. It was not for ostentation, but in pursuance of his undertaking: I must work the works of him that sent me (of which this is one), while it is day, and working time; the night cometh, the period of that day, when no man can work. This is not only a reason shy Christ was constant in doing good to the souls and bodies of men, but why particularly he did this, though it was the sabbath day, on which works of necessity might be done, and he proves this to be a work of necessity.

[1.]It was his Father's will: I must work the works of him that sent me. Note, First, The Father, when he sent his Son into the world, gave him work to do; he did not come into the world to take state, but to do business; whom God sends he employs, for he sends none to be idle. Secondly, The works Christ had to do were the works of him that sent him, not only appointed by him, but done for him; he was a worker together with God. Thirdly, He was pleased to lay himself under the strongest obligations to do the business he was sent about: I must work. He engaged his heart, in the covenant of redemption, to draw near, and approach to God as Mediator, Jeremiah 30:21. Shall we be willing to be loose, when Christ was willing to be bound? Fourthly, Christ, having laid himself under obligations to do his work, laid out himself with the utmost vigour and industry in his work. He worked the works he had to do; did ergazesthai ta erga - made a business of that which was his business. It is not enough to look at our work, and talk over it, but we must work it.

[2.]Now was his opportunity: I must work while it is day, while the time lasts which is appointed to work in, and while the light lasts which is given to work by. Christ himself had his day. First, All the business of the mediatorial kingdom was to be done within the limits of time, and in this world; for at the end of the world, when time shall be no more, the kingdom shall be delivered up to God, even the Father, and the mystery of God finished. Secondly, all the work he had to do in his own person here on earth was to be done before his death; the time of his living in this world is the day here spoken of. Note, The time of our life is our day, in which it concerns us to do the work of the day. Day-time is the proper season for work (Psalm 104:22, Psalm 104:23); during the day of life we must be busy, not waste day-time, nor play by day-light; it will be time enough to rest when our day is done, for it is but a day.

[3.]The period of his opportunity was at hand, and therefore he would be busy; The night comes when no man can work. Note, The consideration of our death approaching should quicken us to improve all the opportunities of life, both for doing and getting good. The night comes, it will come certainly, may come suddenly, is coming nearer and nearer. We cannot compute how nigh our sun is, it may go down at noon; nor can we promise ourselves a twilight between the day of life and the night of death. When the night comes we cannot work, because the light afforded us to work by is extinguished; the grave is a land of darkness, and our work cannot be done in the dark. And, besides, our time allotted us for our work will then have expired; when our Master tied us to duty he tied us to time too; when night comes, call the labourers; we must then show our work, and receive according to the things done. In the world of retribution we are no longer probationers; it is too late to bid when the inch of candle is dropped. Christ uses this as an argument with himself to be diligent, though he had no opposition from within to struggle with; much more need have we to work upon our hearts these and the like considerations to quicken us.

[4.]His business in the world was to enlighten it (John 9:5): As long as I am in the world, and that will not be long, I am the light of the world. He had said this before, John 8:12. He is the Sun of righteousness, that has not only light in his wings for those that can see, but healing in his wings, or beams, for those that are blind and cannot see, therein far exceeding in virtue that great light which rules by day. Christ would cure this blind man, the representative of a blind world, because he came to be the light of the world, not only to give light, but to give sight. Now this gives us, First, A great encouragement to come to him, as a guiding, quickening, refreshing light. To whom should we look but to him? Which way should we turn our eyes, but to the light? We partake of the sun's light, and so we may of Christ's grace, without money and without price. Secondly, A good example of usefulness in the world. What Christ saith of himself, he saith of his disciples: You are lights in the world, and, if so, Let your light shine. What were candles made for but to burn?

III.The manner of the cure of the blind man, John 9:6, John 9:7.

The circumstances of the miracle are singular, and no doubt significant. When he had thus spoken for the instruction of his disciples, and the opening of their understandings, he addressed himself to the opening of the blind man's eyes. He did not defer it till he could do it either more privately, for his greater safety, or more publicly, for his greater honour, or till the sabbath was past, when it would give less offence. What good we have opportunity of doing we should do quickly; he that will never do a good work till there is nothing to be objected against it will leave many a good work for ever undone, Ecclesiastes 11:4. In the cure observe,

1.The preparation of the eye-salve. Christ spat on the ground, and made clay of the spittle. He could have cured him with a word, as he did others, but he chose to do it in this way to show that he is not tied to any method. He made clay of his own spittle, because there was no water near; and he would teach us not to be nice or curious, but, when we have at any time occasion, to be willing to take up with that which is next hand, if it will but serve the turn. Why should we go about for that which may as well be had and done a nearer way? Christ's making use of his own spittle intimates that there is healing virtue in every thing that belongs to Christ; clay made of Christ's spittle was much more precious than the balm of Gilead.

2.The application of it to the place: He anointed the eyes of the blind man with the clay. Or, as the margin reads it, He spread (epechrise), he daubed the clay upon the eyes of the blind man, like a tender physician; he did it himself with his own hand, though the patient was a beggar. Now Christ did this,

(1.)To magnify his power in making a blind man to see by that method which one would think more likely to make a seeing man blind. Daubing clay on the eyes would close them up, but never open them. Note, The power of God often works by contraries; and he makes men feel their own blindness before he gives them sight.

(2.)To give an intimation that it was his mighty hand, the very same that at first made man out of the clay; for by him God made the worlds, both the great world, and man the little world. Man was formed out of the clay, and moulded like the clay, and here Christ used the same materials to give sight to the body that at first he used to give being to it.

(3.)To represent and typify the healing and opening of the eyes of the mind by the grace of Jesus Christ. The design of the gospel is to open men's eyes, Acts 26:18. Now the eye-salve that does the work is of Christ's preparing; it is made up, not as this, of his spittle, but of his blood, the blood and water that came out of his pierced side; we must come to Christ for the eye-salve, Revelation 3:18. He only is able, and he only is appointed, to make it up, Luke 4:18. The means used in this work are very weak and unlikely, and are made effectual only by the power of Christ; when a dark world was to be enlightened, and nations of blind souls were to have their eyes opened, God chose the foolish things, and weak, and despised, for the doing of it. And the method Christ takes is first to make men feel themselves blind, as this poor man did whose eyes were daubed with clay, and then to give them sight. Paul in his conversion was struck blind for three days, and then the scales fell from his eyes. The way prescribed for getting spiritual wisdom is, Let a man become a fool, that he may be wise, 1 Corinthians 3:18. We must be made uneasy with our blindness, as this man here, and then healed.

3.The directions given to the patient, John 9:7. His physician said to him, Go, wash in the pool of Siloam. Not that this washing was needful to effect the cure; but,

(1.)Christ would hereby try his obedience, and whether he would with an implicit faith obey the orders of one he was so much a stranger to.

(2.)He would likewise try how he stood affected to the tradition of the elders, which taught, and perhaps had taught him (for many that are blind are very knowing), that it was not lawful to wash the eyes, no not with spittle medicinally, on the sabbath day, much less to go to a pool of water to wash them.

(3.)He would hereby represent the method of spiritual healing, in which, though the effect is owing purely to his power and grace, there is duty to be done by us. Go, search the scriptures, attend upon the ministry, converse with the wise; this is like washing in the pool of Siloam. Promised graces must be expected in the way of instituted ordinances. The waters of baptism were to those who had been trained up in darkness like the pool of Siloam, in which they might not only wash and be clean, but wash, and have their eyes opened. Hence they that were baptized are said to be phōtisthentes - enlightened; and the ancients called baptism phōtismos - illumination. Concerning the pool of Siloam observe,

[1.]That it was supplied with water from mount Zion, so that these were the waters of the sanctuary (Psalm 46:4), living waters, which were healing, Ezekiel 47:9.

[2.]That the waters of Siloam had of old signified the throne and kingdom of the house of David, pointing at the Messiah (Isaiah 8:6), and the Jews who refused the waters of Shiloa, Christ's doctrine and law, and rejoiced in the tradition of the elders. Christ would try this man, whether he would cleave to the waters of Siloam or no.

[3.]The evangelist takes notice of the signification of the name, its being interpreted sent. Christ is often called the sent of God, the Messenger of the covenant (Malachi 3:1); so that when Christ sent him to the pool of Siloam he did in effect send him to himself; for Christ is all in all to the healing of souls. Christ as a prophet directs us to himself as a priest. Go, wash in the fountain opened, a fountain of life, not a pool.

4.The patient's obedience to these directions: He went his way therefore, probably led by some friend or other; or perhaps he was so well acquainted with Jerusalem that he could find the way himself. Nature often supplies the want of sight with an uncommon sagacity; and he washed his eyes; probably the disciples, or some stander by, informed him that he who bade him do it was that Jesus whom he had heard so much of, else he would not have gone, at his bidding, on that which looked so much like a fool's errand; in confidence of Christ's power, as well as in obedience to his command, he went, and washed.

5.The cure effected: He came seeing. There is more glory in this concise narrative, He went and washed, and came seeing, than in Caesar's Veni, vidi, vici - I came, I saw, I conquered. When the clay was washed off from his eyes, all the other impediments were removed with it; so when the pangs and struggles of the new birth are over, and the pains and terrors of conviction past, the bands of sin fly off with them, and a glorious light and liberty succeed. See here an instance,

(1.)Of the power of Christ. What cannot he do who could not only do this, but do it thus? With a lump of clay laid on either eye, and washed off again, he couched those cataracts immediately which the most skilful oculist, with the finest instrument and the most curious hand, could not remove. No doubt this is he that should come, for by him the blind receive their sight.

(2.)It is an instance of the virtue of faith and obedience. This man let Christ do what he pleased, and did what he appointed him to do, and so was cured. Those that would be healed by Christ must be ruled by him. He came back from the pool to his neighbours and acquaintance, wondering and wondered at; he came seeing. This represents the benefit gracious souls find in attending on instituted ordinances, according to Christ's appointment; they have gone to the pool of Siloam weak, and have come away strengthened; have gone doubting, and come away satisfied; have gone mourning, and come away rejoicing; have gone trembling, and come away triumphing; have gone blind, and come away seeing, come away singing, Isaiah 52:8.

Historical interpretation

Nine Centuries of Reception

11 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

11 quotes · AD 202–1107
Ante-NicenePost-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
20030040050060070080090010001100

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

d. AD 202IrenaeusAnte-NiceneSourceAgainst Heresies Book V
And therefore, when His disciples asked Him for what cause the man had been born blind, whether for his own or his parents' fault, He replied, "Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents, but that the works of God should be made manifest in him."
But when He said, "That the glory of God might be manifested," He spake of Himself, not of the Father; His glory was already manifest. For since they had heard that God made man, taking the dust of the earth, so also Christ made clay. To have said, "I am He who took the dust of the earth, and made man," would have seemed a hard thing to His hearers; but this when shown by actual working, no longer stood in their way. So that He by taking earth, and mixing it with spittle, showed forth His hidden glory; for no small glory was it that He should be deemed the Architect of the creation.
d. AD 407John Chrysostomas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Hom. lvi. 1) The Jews having rejected Christ's words, because of their depth, He went out of the temple, and healed the blind man; that His absence might appease their fury, and the miracle soften their hard hearts, and convince their unbelief. And as Jesus passed by, He saw a man which was blind from his birth. It is to be remarked here that, on going out of the temple, He betook Himself intently to this manifestation of His power. He first saw the blind man, not the blind man Him: and so intently did He fix His eye upon him, that His disciples were struck, and asked, Rabbi, who did sin, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?

(Hom. liv. 1. c. 5) They were led to ask this question, by our Lord having said above, on healing the man sick of the palsy, Lo, thou art made whole; sin no more. Thinking from this that the man had been struck with the palsy for his sins, they ask our Lord of the blind man here, whether he did sin, or his parents; neither of which could have been the reason of his blindness; the former, because he had been blind from his birth; the latter, because the son does not suffer for the father.
Jesus answered, Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents.

(Hom. lvi. 1, 2) He is not to be understood as meaning that others had become blind, in consequence of their parents' sins: for one man cannot be punished for the sin of another. But had the man therefore suffered unjustly? Rather I should say that that blindness was a benefit to him: for by it he was brought to see with the inward eye. At any rate He who brought him into being out of nothing, had the power to make him in the event no loser by it. Some too say, that the that here, is expressive not of the cause, but of the event, as in the passage in Romans, The law entered that sin might abound; (Rom. 5:20) the effect in this case being, that our Lord by opening the closed eye, and healing other natural infirmities, demonstrated His own power.

(Hom. liv. 2) That the glory of God should be made manifest, He saith of Himself, not of the Father; the Father's glory was manifest already. I must work the works of Him that sent Me: i. e. I must manifest Myself, and show that I do the same that My Father doeth.

(Hom. lvi. 2) While it is day, He adds; i. e. while men have the opportunity of believing in Me; while this life lasts; The night cometh, when none can work. Night here means that spoken of in Matthew, Cast him into outer darkness. (Mat. 22:13) Then will there be night, wherein none can work, but only receive for that which he has worked. While thou livest, do that which thou wilt do: for beyond it is neither faith, nor labour, nor repentance.
"That the glory of God should be made manifest," He saith. Lo, here again is another difficulty, if without this man's punishment, it was not possible that the glory of God should be shown. Certainly it is not said that it was impossible, for it was possible, but, "that it might be manifested even in this man." "What," saith some one, "did he suffer wrong for the glory of God?" What wrong, tell me? For what if God had never willed to produce him at all? But I assert that he even received benefit from his blindness: since he recovered the sight of the eyes within. What were the Jews profited by their eyes? They incurred the heavier punishment, being blinded even while they saw. And what injury had this man by his blindness? For by means of it he recovered sight. As then the evils of the present life are not evils, so neither are the good things good; sin alone is an evil, but blindness is not an evil. And He who had brought this man from not being into being, had also power to leave him as he was.
"Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents." This He saith not as acquitting them of sins, for He saith not simply, "Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents," but addeth, "that he should have been born blind" - "but that the Son of God should be glorified in him." "For both this man hath sinned and his parents, but his blindness proceedeth not from that." And this He said, not signifying that though this man indeed was not in such case, yet that others had been made blind from such a cause, the sins of their parents, since it cannot be that when one sinneth another should be punished. For if we allow this, we must also allow that he sinned before his birth. As therefore when He declared, "neither hath this man sinned," He said not that it is possible to sin from one's very birth, and be punished for it; so when He said, "nor his parents," He said not that one may be punished for his parents' sake.
d. AD 428Theodore of MopsuestiaPost-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON JOHN 4.9.3
The Lord taught the disciples that there are many reasons for all these events and that they are certainly secret and unexplainable. And so, we always complain about events whose causes we ignore, but then we also learn that nothing happens in vain. This knowledge will be given to us in the future world, because what is hidden now will be revealed to us.
d. AD 428Theodore of MopsuestiaPost-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON JOHN 4.9.1-2
It was not unusual for his disciples to ask this kind of question about all that was happening to the Lord so that they could learn those things that lead to godliness. Indeed, since they had left everything and had given themselves completely to the Lord in order to learn from him godliness and piety, it is with laudable care that they took the opportunity from what happened around them to ask him such questions. When they saw this man born blind who, before he could sin, had this damage, and to whom this defect of the eyes happened when he was still in the womb, they were upset in their human way about this fact in trying to relate it to their faith. They thought that there was a just reason for such an accident and that such adversity had occurred not without good cause because they knew that God rules all human things. They were not able to understand what had happened in any other way because of their human weakness, attributing the reason for what happened either to the sin of the parents or to the blind man himself. It was not that he had been injured because he had sinned already—indeed, how could he sin if he was not born yet? But, since he would commit future sins, God, in his foreknowledge, restrained him by that disability. They justly and piously thought that the sins of people were the cause of all evils. But since, because of their human weakness, they could understand nothing more by themselves, they thought that the cause for this disability could only be attributed to the blind man himself or to his parents; as if the son had received that punishment for their sins, or he was the cause of his misfortune because he had received that punishment for his future sins.
d. AD 430Augustine of Hippoas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Tr. xliv. 3) Was he then born without original sin, or had he never added to it by actual sin? Both this man and his parents had sinned, but that sin was not the reason why he was born blind. Our Lord gives the reason; viz. That the works of God should be made manifest in him.
That which lies before us is hard to explain and capable of causing much perplexity, so that it would be perhaps not unlearned to pass it over in silence, and because of its excessive difficulty to leave it. But when the Jewish doctrines have been refuted, lest another thing akin to them, like any root of bitterness springing up, trouble you, as Paul says; (for perhaps some will hence suspect that the bodies of men are affected with sufferings, in order that the works of Grod may be made manifest in them;) I, for my part, think it seasonable to subjoin a few words with reference to this, that thereby we may both keep off any injuries arising from this source, and leave no loophole for deceptive arguments. That God does not bring the sins of parents upon children unless they are partakers of their wickedness, and further, that embodiment is not on account of sins previously committed by the soul, we have shown. For by speaking in opposition to these two errors, Christ in a wonderful manner overturned them, since He unquestionably knows all things, as God; or rather, since He Himself is the over-ruler of our affairs, and the ordainer of those things which befit and are deserved by every man. For in that He says the blind man had not sinned, nor was suffering blindness on that account, He shows that it is foolish to suppose the soul of man to be guilty of sins previous to its birth in the body: moreover, when He openly says that neither had His parents sinned that their son should be born blind, He refutes the silly suspicion of the Jews. Therefore, after He had taught His disciples as much as was necessary for them to know in order to refute the doctrines which we have above stated, and imparted to them as much as it was fitting to exhibit to the understanding of man, He is silent as to the rest, and sets forth no further with clearness the reason why he was born blind who was guilty of no sin previous to birth, attributing to the Divine Nature alone the knowledge of all such things and a management of affairs which is past finding out. But again He very skilfully transfers the language of His answer to something else and says; But that the works of God should be made manifest in him.

Does then, some one will say, the Lord declare to us these words here as a certain doctrine, as if for this single reason ailments attack the bodies of men, that the works of God should be made manifest in them? It does not seem so at all to me, but rather it is evidently absurd so to imagine or suppose; He certainly is not dogmatizing at all (as some might think) when He says this. For that it happens to some to be smitten on account of their sins, we have often learnt from the Holy Scriptures. Paul indeed plainly writes to those who with feet as it were unwashed dared to approach the holy altar, and with profane and unholy hand to touch the mystical Eucharist: For this cause many among you are weak and sickly, and not a few sleep. For if we judged ourselves, we should not be judged. But when we are judged, we are chastened of the Lord, that we may not be condemned with the world. Accordingly, upon the sickly and dead, it is sometimes by Divine wrath that the suffering has been brought. But also our Lord Jesus Christ Himself, after He had loosed the paralytic from a long disease, and had miraculously made him whole, says: Behold, thou art made whole: sin no more, lest a worse thing befal thee. Surely He says this as though it might happen that unless the man took heed he would suffer something worse for his sin, although he had once escaped and by the Lord's favour been restored to health. But perhaps some may say: we will grant that these things are rightly said; but as to those who suffer something terrible from the cradle and their earliest years, or even from the very womb are afflicted with diseases, it is not easy to understand what kind of explanation any one can satisfactorily give. For we do not believe that the soul previously existed; nor indeed can we think that it sinned before the body, for how can that sin, which has not yet been called to birth? But if there has been no sin nor fault preceding the suffering, what then shall we allege as the cause of the suffering? Truly, by our minds we cannot comprehend those things which are far above us, and I should advise the prudent, and myself above all, to abstain from wishing to thoroughly scrutinize them. For we should recall to mind what we have been commanded, and not curiously examine things which are too deep, nor pry into those which are too hard, nor rashly attempt to discover those which are hidden in the Divine and ineffable counsel alone; but rather concerning such matters we should piously acknowledge that God alone knows some things, peculiar to Himself and excellent. At the same time we should maintain and believe that since He is the fountain of all righteousness, He will neither do nor determine anything whatever in human affairs, or in those of the rest of creation, which is unbecoming to Himself, or differs at all from the true rectitude of justice.

Since therefore it becomes us to be affected in this way, I say, that the Lord does not speak dogmatically when He says, that the works of God should be made manifest in him; but rather He says it to draw off the answer of the questioner in another direction, and to lead us from things too deep for us to more suitable ones; for that is a thing He was in some sort wont to do. And that this assertion is true, hear again how when the holy disciples were earnestly inquiring about the end of the world, and very curiously putting questions concerning His second coming, and going far beyond the limits proper for man, He very evidently draws them away from such interrogations. It is not for you, says He, to know times or seasons which the Father hath set within His own authority. But ye shall receive power, when the Holy Ghost is come upon you; and ye shall be My witnesses both in Jerusalem and in all Judea. Thou hearest that He does not permit us at all to seek into those things which no way are fit for us, but rather directs us to come back to what is necessary. So also in this place, having spoken plainly what was meet for us to learn, He reserves the rest in silence, knowing that it behoved Himself alone to understand this. But lest by being altogether silent He should as it were invite them again to ask Him about the same things, in the manner of alleging a reason, and as though courteously fashioning |some such answer as the questions seemed to deserve, He says, But that the works of God should be made manifest in him. Which is just as if He had said, in different and simpler language: The man was not born blind on account of his own sins or the sins of his parents; but since it has happened that he was so affected, it is possible that in him God may be glorified. For when, by power from above, he shall be found free from the affliction which lies upon him and troubles him, who will not admire the Physician? Who will not recognise the power of the Healer shown forth in Him?

I think this sense is latent in the words before us, but let those who are clever think out the more perfect meaning. And if any think fit to be contentious and say that the man was born blind for the very end that Christ might be glorified in him, we will say to them in reply: Do you suppose, O good people, that this was the only man in Judea who was blind from birth in the time of the coming of our Saviour, and that there was no other whatever? Surely, even though unwilling, they will confess, I think, that in all likelihood very many such were found in all the land. How was it then that Christ only exhibited His kindness and power to one of them, or at all events to but a small number? Concerning these things, however, I deem it superfluous to hold an argument. Wherefore, the other opinion being rejected as foolish, we will hold it true, that after Christ had revealed to us as much about the questions asked as was meet for us to learn, He passed on to another subject, skilfully turning aside His own disciple from searching into such things.
d. AD 604Gregory the Dialogistas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Early MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(in Præf. Moral. c. 5) One stroke falls on the sinner, for punishment only, not conversion; another for correction; another not for correction of past sins, but prevention of future; another neither for correcting past, nor preventing future sins, but by the unexpected deliverance following the blow, to excite more ardent love of the Saviour's goodness.

(viii. Moral. c. xxx. [49.]) Or thus: By His spittle understand the savour of inward contemplation. It runs down from the head into the mouth, and gives us the taste of revelation from the Divine splendour even in this life. The mixture of His spittle with clay is the mixture of supernatural grace, even the contemplation of Himself with our carnal knowledge, to the soul's enlightenment, and restoration of the human understanding from its original blindness.
d. AD 1107Theophylact of OhridMedieval
Now another perplexity arises. One might ask, “How could Christ say this? Was it not unjust to deprive this man of his sight so that the works of God should be made manifest in him? Could not these works have been revealed some other way?” We would answer, “How have you been treated unjustly, O man?” “I have been robbed of light,” he replies. “But what harm did you suffer by being deprived of material light? Now you have received not only physical vision, but that incomparable blessing—the enlightenment of the eyes of your soul.” Thus the affliction was to the blind man’s benefit, and through his healing he came to know the true Sun of Righteousness. Therefore, the blind man was not wronged; he was blessed.

Now, understand this as well, every student of Divine Scripture: the conjunctions ἵνα and ὅπως (both translated in English as “that”) are often used to express the outcome, but not the intended result, of the action stated in the main clause. Thus David says, Against Thee only have I sinned, … that Thou mightest be justified in Thy words (Ps. 50:4). The word that introduces a result unintended by David. When David sinned, he did not do so with the purpose in mind of justifying God; but his sinning did result in God being justified. David proved himself unworthy of all that God had given him: he abused his royal power, committed murder and adultery, violated divine commandments, and showed contempt for God. Taking advantage of his kingship, David spurned the laws of the One Who made him king. Had he been a commoner, he would have been unable to commit the two great sins so easily. Once the Lord had examined and decided his case, the necessary consequence of David’s crimes was that God was justified and had prevailed over the king who was condemned. There are many places in the Epistles where such expressions are used. In Romans Paul writes, “Because that which may be known of God is manifest to the Greeks, for God hath showed it unto them, making His eternal power and Godhead . . . understood by the things that are made, . . . so that they are without excuse (Rom. 1:19-20).” God did not give this knowledge to the Greeks in order to deprive them of any excuse when they sinned. He gave it to them so that they would not sin. When they did sin, their knowledge of the Creator manifest in His creation rendered them guilty without excuse. Likewise, in another place Paul says, The law entered, that the offense might abound (Rom. 5:20), although the law certainly was not given in order to make sin more prevalent, but just the opposite, to keep it in check. But because the recipients of the law did not want to restrain their sin, the law—defining what is a transgression—resulted in sin “abounding.” They considered their sins to be greater and more numerous because they sinned with full knowledge of the law.

In light of all this, Jesus’ words here, that the works of God should be made manifest, do not supply the reason why the man was born blind, but state the consequence—good came from evil, to the glory of God. Let us suppose that a man builds a house but leaves one portion of it unfinished, for this reason: at a later time, if anyone should question if he were the builder, he could  dispel any doubt on this score by completing the unfinished part to match perfectly with the original. In like manner, Jesus our God fashioned all the members of the blind man’s body except for the eyes, which He omitted. By healing them now, He completes the divine act of creating and demonstrates that He is the Creator. When He said, “that the glory of God should be made manifest,” He was referring to Himself, not the Father. The glory of the Father was obvious; it was His own glory, equal to the Father’s, that needed to be revealed. For He Who now appears as a man, in the beginning fashioned man. That He is speaking about Himself becomes clear from what follows: “I must work the works of Him that sent Me. I must reveal Myself by doing the very same works as the Father.” Note that He does not say, “I must do works similar to the Father’s,” but “ works identical to those done by the Father Who sent Me. I must do them while it is day, that is, during this present life, when men can choose to believe in Me. For the night cometh, when no man can work, that is, believe. In the age to come, it will be too late to believe.” Day means this present life, when we are able to work, as we do during the day. But, elsewhere in Scripture, Paul calls life night, because we cannot know in this life whether a man pursues virtue or wickedness—his thoughts and motives are hidden from us. Moreover, Paul calls this life night by comparison to the daylight of the age to come, in which the righteous will shine. Christ refers to the age to come as night, when no man can work; Paul calls this day, since the righteous will be illumined and the deeds of each revealed. In the age to come there will be no faith, but only obedience—voluntary or involuntary. “As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world,” says Christ, “because I enlighten souls by My teaching and miracles. By healing the blind man’s eyes and giving them light, I shall enlighten the souls of many. I am Light, and I illumine both the senses and the spirit.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying John 9:3 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8