Skip to content
“Greeks Seek Jesus; The Hour Has Come”· John 12:20–36
Translation
King James Version
The people therefore, that stood by, and heard it, said that it thundered: others said, An angel spake to him.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
The people G3793 therefore G3767, that stood by G2476, and G2532 heard G191 it, said G3004 that it thundered G1096 G1027: others G243 said G3004, An angel G32 spake G2980 to him G846.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The crowd standing there and hearing it said that it had thundered; others said, “An angel spoke to him.”
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
The crowd standing there heard it and said that it had thundered. Others said that an angel had spoken to Him.
Ask
American Standard Version
The multitude therefore, that stood by, and heard it, said that it had thundered: others said, An angel hath spoken to him.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The multitude therefore, who stood by and heard it, said that it had thundered. Others said, “An angel has spoken to him.”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then saide the people that stoode by, and heard, that it was a thunder: other said, An Angel spake to him.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
the multitude, therefore, having stood and heard, were saying that there hath been thunder; others said, `A messenger hath spoken to him.'
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All John Sites (Jerusalem)
All John Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
Jesus Final Trip to Jerusalem in John
Jesus Final Trip to Jerusalem in John View full PDF
John 7:45-53, John 12:20-35
John 7:45-53, John 12:20-35 View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 26,610 of 31,102 · 85.6%

Study This Verse

Summary

John 12:29 captures the immediate, diverse reactions of the crowd to a profound divine utterance that had just affirmed Jesus's mission and impending glorification. This pivotal moment, occurring just days before Jesus's crucifixion, underscores the varied human capacity for spiritual discernment when confronted with supernatural revelation, revealing a spectrum from naturalistic dismissal to supernatural misinterpretation of God's direct communication.

Context

Literary Context

This verse immediately follows the Father's audible declaration in John 12:28, "I have both glorified it, and will glorify it again." This divine affirmation is a direct response to Jesus's prayer, "Father, glorify thy name." The preceding discourse in John 12:20-27 reveals Jesus wrestling with the imminence of His death, likening it to a grain of wheat falling into the earth to bear much fruit (John 12:24). The divine voice, therefore, serves as a powerful, public, and immediate validation of Jesus's understanding of His mission and the Father's active role in His glorification through suffering. The crowd's reaction sets the stage for Jesus's subsequent explanation of the voice's purpose in John 12:30.

Historical & Cultural Context

The setting is Jerusalem during the Passover festival, a time of heightened religious fervor and messianic expectation. Crowds from all over the Jewish world had gathered, many of whom had heard of Jesus's miracles, particularly the recent raising of Lazarus (John 12:1-11). The people present would have been familiar with the concept of divine manifestations, including the "Bath Qol" (daughter of a voice), a rabbinic term for a heavenly voice believed to convey God's will after prophecy ceased. However, direct, audible communication from God was considered rare and momentous. Their varied interpretations reflect the diverse theological and spiritual understanding within first-century Judaism, where some were open to supernatural intervention, while others sought naturalistic explanations or attributed such events to angelic intermediaries, rather than direct divine speech.

Key Themes

John 12:29 contributes significantly to several key themes within the Gospel of John and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it highlights the theme of Divine Manifestation and Human Perception. God's voice, though clearly understood by Jesus, is perceived ambiguously by the crowd, illustrating the limitations of human understanding and spiritual receptivity in the face of divine reality. Secondly, the verse underscores the theme of Spiritual Discernment. The inability of many to recognize the voice of God, attributing it instead to a natural phenomenon like thunder or a lesser supernatural agent like an angel, reveals a critical lack of spiritual insight. This contrasts sharply with Jesus's perfect understanding and immediate response. Finally, this event serves as a public Validation of Jesus's Authority and Identity. Like the voices at His baptism (Matthew 3:17) and transfiguration (Matthew 17:5), this audible declaration from the Father unequivocally affirms Jesus's unique relationship with God and the divine endorsement of His redemptive mission, even amidst human misunderstanding.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

heard akoúō' G191

This word (G191) is a primary verb meaning "to hear (in various senses)." In this context, it indicates that the sound was indeed audible to the crowd, but their perception of its nature and source varied. It implies a physical reception of sound waves, but not necessarily a spiritual comprehension of the message. The fact that they "heard" something is undeniable, but what they made of it is the crucial point.

thundered brontḗ' G1027

This noun (G1027), akin to a word meaning "to roar," specifically refers to "thunder." The use of this word by some in the crowd suggests a naturalistic explanation for the loud, unidentifiable sound they heard. It represents a dismissal of any supernatural origin, reducing a divine manifestation to a common meteorological phenomenon, indicating a lack of spiritual discernment or a predisposition to rationalize away the miraculous.

angel ángelos' G32

This noun (G32), derived from a root meaning "to bring tidings," means "a messenger," especially an "angel." For others in the crowd, the sound was clearly supernatural, but they attributed it to an angelic messenger rather than to God directly. This interpretation, while acknowledging a divine realm, still falls short of recognizing the direct voice of God the Father, perhaps reflecting a common Jewish belief in angels as intermediaries for divine communication, or a reluctance to believe in such a direct, personal encounter with God.

Verse Breakdown

"The people therefore, that stood by, and heard [it],"

This clause establishes the setting and the audience. A crowd was present, and they physically heard the sound. The inclusion of "therefore" links their reaction directly to the preceding divine voice. Their presence and auditory experience are foundational to the subsequent interpretations.

"said that it thundered:"

This represents the first, more naturalistic interpretation. Some in the crowd, unable or unwilling to grasp the supernatural nature of the sound, dismissed it as a mere natural phenomenon—thunder. This highlights a common human tendency to rationalize away events that defy ordinary explanation, or a profound spiritual dullness.

"others said, An angel spake to him."

This clause presents the second, more supernatural, yet still incomplete, interpretation. Another segment of the crowd recognized the sound as something more than natural thunder, attributing it to an angelic voice. While this acknowledges a supernatural origin, it falls short of identifying the speaker as God the Father Himself, revealing a partial, rather than full, spiritual discernment.

Literary Devices

John 12:29 employs several significant Literary Devices. The most prominent is Contrast, as the verse sharply juxtaposes two differing interpretations of the same divine event: some hear mere thunder, while others perceive an angelic voice. This contrast highlights the varying degrees of spiritual perception and receptivity among the onlookers. This also functions as Irony, as the Father's voice, intended to glorify Jesus, is largely misunderstood by the very people who stand to benefit from recognizing His divine authority. Furthermore, the event serves as Foreshadowing, subtly hinting at the broader human rejection and misunderstanding of Jesus's true identity and mission, which culminates in His crucifixion. The ambiguity of the sound to the crowd, despite its clarity to Jesus, underscores the theme of Divine Revelation and Human Response, emphasizing that even direct divine communication can be misconstrued if one lacks spiritual ears to hear.

Theological and Thematic Connections

John 12:29 powerfully illustrates the theological truth that while God speaks, human beings often struggle to hear or correctly interpret His voice. The Father's audible declaration was intended to validate Jesus's mission and glorify His name, yet the crowd's fragmented and erroneous interpretations reveal the profound impact of spiritual receptivity (or lack thereof) on one's ability to discern divine truth. This incident parallels other biblical accounts where God's direct communication is met with diverse human responses, from awe and obedience to fear, confusion, or even outright dismissal. It underscores the necessity of a Spirit-illumined heart to truly comprehend the things of God, distinguishing between natural phenomena, angelic messages, and the very voice of the Almighty.

Matthew 3:17At Jesus's baptism, a voice from heaven declared, "This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased," a clear divine affirmation.
Matthew 17:5During the Transfiguration, a bright cloud overshadowed Jesus and the disciples, and a voice from the cloud said, "This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye him."
Acts 9:7When Jesus appeared to Saul on the road to Damascus, the men traveling with him "heard a voice, but saw no man," similar to the crowd in John 12:29 who heard a sound but did not fully comprehend its source or meaning.

Reflection and Application

John 12:29 serves as a profound mirror for our own spiritual lives, challenging us to examine the depth of our spiritual receptivity. In a world saturated with noise and competing voices, how attuned are our hearts to the subtle or overt ways in which God communicates? Are we prone to dismiss divine promptings as mere coincidences, like those who heard "thunder," or to dilute their significance by attributing them to lesser sources, like those who heard "an angel"? This verse calls us to cultivate a discerning spirit, one that actively seeks to hear and understand God's voice, whether through His Word, His Spirit, or His providential workings. It reminds us that spiritual understanding is not merely an intellectual exercise but a matter of the heart's posture toward divine revelation. Furthermore, it highlights that not everyone will grasp spiritual truths, even when powerfully revealed, underscoring the importance of persistent prayer for discernment and a humble willingness to acknowledge God's direct involvement in our lives and in the world.

Questions for Reflection

  1. In what ways might I be prone to dismiss or misinterpret God's voice in my own life, perhaps attributing divine interventions to mere chance or human effort?
  2. What practices can I cultivate to enhance my spiritual discernment and become more attuned to the various ways God speaks today?
  3. How does the crowd's varied reaction to God's voice inform my understanding of why some people embrace spiritual truths while others remain skeptical or misinformed?

FAQ

Why did some people think it thundered, while others thought an angel spoke?

The varying interpretations among the crowd in John 12:29 highlight the diverse spiritual receptivity and understanding present. For some, a loud, unidentifiable sound would naturally be attributed to thunder, a common meteorological phenomenon, indicating a lack of spiritual discernment or a predisposition to explain away the miraculous with naturalistic reasoning. For others, the sound was clearly supernatural and distinct from mere thunder, leading them to believe it was the voice of an angel. In Jewish tradition, angels often served as divine messengers, so this was a plausible supernatural explanation for them. Neither group fully recognized it as the direct voice of God the Father, demonstrating how human perception can filter or misinterpret divine revelation based on their spiritual state, prior beliefs, and openness to the truly extraordinary. Jesus later clarifies in John 12:30 that the voice was for their benefit, not His own.

What was the purpose of the voice speaking to Jesus publicly?

The voice from heaven, as recorded in John 12:28, served multiple crucial purposes, primarily for the benefit of the crowd rather than Jesus Himself. Jesus explicitly states this in John 12:30: "This voice came not because of me, but for your sakes." Firstly, it was a public, audible validation of Jesus's divine identity and mission, particularly His impending glorification through suffering and death, which He had just spoken about (John 12:23-27). Secondly, it was an undeniable sign to the Jewish people, confirming that God the Father was actively involved in and approved of Jesus's work, even as many were struggling to believe. This divine affirmation served to authenticate Jesus's claims and underscore the profound significance of the events unfolding in Jerusalem during that Passover week.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

John 12:29, with its depiction of human misunderstanding in the face of divine revelation, powerfully points to the ultimate Christ-centered fulfillment found in the person and work of Jesus. The voice from heaven was the Father's direct affirmation of His Son, a testament to Jesus's unique status as the incarnate Word through whom God now speaks most fully (Hebrews 1:1-2). The crowd's inability to discern the Father's voice—some hearing thunder, others an angel—foreshadows the broader spiritual blindness that would lead many to reject Jesus, the very embodiment of God's truth and glory. In Christ, God has not merely sent a messenger or a fleeting sound, but has revealed Himself fully and definitively, for "no one has ever seen God; the only God, who is at the Father's side, he has made him known" (John 1:18). The confusion of the crowd highlights humanity's desperate need for the perfect interpreter of God's will and nature, a role perfectly fulfilled by Jesus, who is "the way, and the truth, and the life" (John 14:6). Thus, the partial and misconstrued hearing of the voice in John 12:29 ultimately magnifies the clarity and completeness of God's revelation in Jesus Christ, inviting all to hear and believe in Him who is the very Word of God made flesh.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers John 12:27–36. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 10 verses
Passage under commentJohn 12:27–36
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

Honour is here done to Christ by his Father in a voice from heaven, occasioned by the following part of his discourse, and which gave occasion to a further conference with the people. In these verses we have,

I.Christ's address to his Father, upon occasion of the trouble which seized his spirit at this time:

Now is my soul troubled, Joh 12:27. A strange word to come from Christ's mouth, and at this time surprising, for it comes in the midst of divers pleasing prospects, in which, one would think, he should have said, Now is my soul pleased. Note, Trouble of soul sometimes follows after great enlargements of spirit. In this world of mixture and change we must expect damps upon our joy, and the highest degree of comfort to be the next degree to trouble. When Paul had been in the third heavens, he had a thorn in the flesh. Observe,

1.Christ's dread of his approaching sufferings: Now is my soul troubled. Now the black and dismal scene began, now were the first throes of the travail of his soul, now his agony began, his soul began to be exceedingly sorrowful. Note,

(1.)The sin of our soul was the trouble of Christ's soul, when he undertook to redeem and save us, and to make his soul an offering for our sin.

(2.)The trouble of his soul was designed to ease the trouble of our souls; for, after this, he said to his disciples (Joh 14:1), "Let not your hearts be troubled; why should yours be troubled and mine too?" Our Lord Jesus went on cheerfully in his work, in prospect of the joy set before him, and yet submitted to a trouble of soul. Holy mourning is consistent with spiritual joy, and the way to eternal joy. Christ was now troubled, now in sorrow, now in fear, now for a season; but it would not be so always, it would not be so long. The same is the comfort of Christians in their troubles; they are but for a moment, and will be turned into joy.

2.The strait he seems to be in hereupon, intimated in those words, And what shall I say? This does not imply his consulting with any other, as if he needed advice, but considering with himself what was fit to be said now. When our souls are troubled we must take heed of speaking unadvisedly, but debate with ourselves what we shall say. Christ speaks like one at a loss, as if what he should choose he wot not. There was a struggle between the work he had taken upon him, which required sufferings, and the nature he had taken upon him, which dreaded them; between these two he here pauses with, What shall I say? He looked, and there was none to help, which put him to a stand. Calvin observes this as a great instance of Christ's humiliation, that he should speak thus like one at a loss. Quo se magis exinanivit gloriae Dominus, eo luculentius habemus erga nos amoris specimen - The more entirely the Lord of glory emptied himself, the brighter is the proof of the love he bore us. Thus he was in all points tempted like as we are, to encourage us, when we know not what to do, to direct our eyes to him.

3.His prayer to God in this strait: Father, save me from this hour, ek tēs ōras tautēs - out of this hour, praying, not so much that it might not come as that he might be brought through it. Save me from this hour; this was the language of innocent nature, and its feelings poured forth in prayer. Note, It is the duty and interest of troubled souls to have recourse to God by faithful and fervent prayer, and in prayer to eye him as a Father. Christ was voluntary in his sufferings, and yet prayed to be saved from them. Note, Prayer against a trouble may very well consist with patience under it and submission to the will of God in it. Observe, He calls his suffering this hour, meaning the expected events of the time now at hand. Hereby he intimates that the time of his suffering was,

(1.)A set time, set to an hour, and he knew it. It was said twice before that his hour was not yet come, but it was now so near that he might say it was come.

(2.)A short time. An hour is soon over, so were Christ's sufferings; he could see through them to the joy set before him.

4.His acquiescence in his Father's will, notwithstanding. He presently corrects himself, and, as it were, recals what he had said: But for this cause came I to this hour. Innocent nature got the first word, but divine wisdom and love got the last. Note, those who would proceed regularly must go upon second thoughts. The complainant speaks first; but, if we would judge righteously, we must hear the other side. With the second thought he checked himself: For this cause came I to this hour; he does not silence himself with this, that he could not avoid it, there was no remedy; but satisfies himself with this, that he would not avoid it, for it was pursuant to his own voluntary engagement, and was to be the crown of his whole undertaking; should he now fly off, this would frustrate all that had been done hitherto. Reference is here had to the divine counsels concerning his sufferings, by virtue of which it behoved him thus to submit and suffer. Note, This should reconcile us to the darkest hours of our lives, that we were all along designed for them; see Th1 3:3.

5.His regard to his Father's honour herein. Upon the withdrawing of his former petition, he presents another, which he will abide by: Father, glorify thy name, to the same purport with Father, thy will be done; for God's will is for his own glory. This expresses more than barely a submission to the will of God; it is a consecration of his sufferings to the glory of God. It was a mediatorial word, and was spoken by him as our surety, who had undertaken to satisfy divine justice for our sin. The wrong which by sin we have done to God is in his glory, his declarative glory; for in nothing else are we capable of doing him injury. We were never able to make him satisfaction for this wrong done him, nor any creature for us; nothing therefore remained but that God should get him honour upon us in our utter ruin. Here therefore our Lord Jesus interposed, undertook to satisfy God's injured honour, and he did it by his humiliation; he denied himself in, and divested himself of, the honours due to the Son of God incarnate, and submitted to the greatest reproach. Now here he makes a tender of this satisfaction as an equivalent: "Father, glorify thy name; let thy justice be honoured upon the sacrifice, not upon the sinner; let the debt be levied upon me, I am solvent, the principal is not." Thus he restored that which he took not away.

II.The Father's answer to this address; for he heard him always, and does still. Observe,

1.How this answer was given. By a voice from heaven. The Jews speak much of a Bath-kôl - the daughter of a voice, as one of those divers manners by which God in time past spoke to the prophets; but we do not find any instance of his speaking thus to any but to our Lord Jesus; it was an honour reserved for him (Mat 3:17; Mat 17:5), and here, probably, this audible voice was introduced by some visible appearance, either of light or darkness, for both have been used as vehicles of the divine glory.

2.What the answer was. It was an express return to that petition, Father, glorify thy name: I have glorified it already, and I will glorify it yet again. When we pray as we are taught, Our Father, hallowed be thy name, this is a comfort to us, that is it an answered prayer; answered to Christ here, and in him to all true believers.

(1.)The name of God had been glorified in the life of Christ, in his doctrine and miracles, and all the examples he gave of holiness and goodness.

(2.)It should be further glorified in the death and sufferings of Christ. His wisdom and power, his justice and holiness, his truth and goodness, were greatly glorified; the demands of a broken law were fully answered; the affront done to God's government satisfied for; and God accepted the satisfaction, and declared himself well pleased. What God has done for the glorifying of his own name is an encouragement to us to expect what he will yet further do. He that has secured the interests of his own glory will still secure them.

III.The opinion of the standers-by concerning this voice, Joh 12:29.

We may hope there were some among them whose minds were so well prepared to receive a divine revelation that they understood what was said and bore record of it. But notice is here taken of the perverse suggestion of the multitude: some of them said that it thundered: others, who took notice that there was plainly an articulate intelligible voice, said that certainly an angel spoke to him. Now this shows,

1.That it was a real thing, even in the judgment of those that were not at all well affected to him.

2.That they were loth to admit so plain a proof of Christ's divine mission. They would rather say that it was this, or that, or any thing, than that God spoke to him in answer to his prayer; and yet, if it thundered with articulate sounds (as Rev 10:3, Rev 10:4), was not that God's voice? Or, if angels spoke to him, are not they God's messengers? But thus God speaks once, yea twice, and man perceives it not.

IV.The account which our Saviour himself gives of this voice.

1.Why it was sent (Joh 12:30): "It came not because of me, not merely for my encouragement and satisfaction" (then it might have been whispered in his ear privately), "but for your sakes." (1.) "That all you who heard it may believe that the Father hath sent me." What is said from heaven concerning our Lord Jesus, and the glorifying of the Father in him, is said for our sakes, that we may be brought to submit to him and rest upon him. (2.) "That you my disciples, who are to follow me in sufferings, may therein be comforted with the same comforts that carry me on." Let this encourage them to part with life itself for his sake, if they be called to it, that it will redound to the honour of God. Note, The promises and supports granted to our Lord Jesus in his sufferings were intended for our sakes. For our sakes he sanctified himself, and comforted himself.

2.What was the meaning of it. He that lay in the Father's bosom knew his voice, and what was the meaning of it; and two things God intended when he said that he would glorify his own name: -

(1.)That by the death of Christ Satan should be conquered (Joh 12:31): Now is the judgment. He speaks with a divine exultation and triumph. "Now the year of my redeemed is come, and the time prefixed for breaking the serpent's head, and giving a total rent to the powers of darkness; now for that glorious achievement: now, now, that great work is to be done which has been so long thought of in the divine counsels, so long talked of in the written word, which has been so much the hope of saints and the dread of devils." The matter of the triumph is,

[1.]That now is the judgment of the world; krisis, take it as a medical term: "Now is the crisis of this world." The sick and diseased world is now upon the turning point; this is the critical day upon which the trembling scale will turn for life or death, to all mankind; all that are not recovered by this will be left helpless and hopeless. Or, rather, it is a law term, as we take it: "Now, judgment is entered, in order to the taking out of execution against the prince of this world." Note, The death of Christ was the judgment of this world. First, It is a judgment of discovery and distinction - judicium discretionis; so Austin. Now is the trial of this world, for men shall have their character according as the cross of Christ is to them; to some it is foolishness and a stumbling-block, to others it is the wisdom and power of God; of which there was a figure in the two thieves that were crucified with him. By this men are judged, what they think of the death of Christ. Secondly, It is a judgment of favour and absolution to the chosen ones that are in the world. Christ upon the cross interposed between a righteous God and a guilty world as a sacrifice for sin and a surety for sinners, so that when he was judged, and iniquity laid upon him, and he was wounded for our transgressions, it was as it were the judgment of this world, for an everlasting righteousness was thereby brought in, not for Jews only, but the whole world, Jo1 2:1, Jo1 2:2; Dan 9:24. Thirdly, It is a judgment of condemnation given against the powers of darkness; see Joh 16:11. Judgment is put for vindication and deliverance, the asserting of an invaded right. At the death of Christ there was a famous trial between Christ and Satan, the serpent and the promised seed; the trial was for the world, and the lordship of it; the devil had long borne sway among the children of men, time out of mind; he now pleads prescription, grounding his claim also upon the forfeiture incurred by sin. We find him willing to have come to a composition (Luk 4:6, Luk 4:7); he would have given the kingdoms of this world to Christ, provided he would hold them by, fRom. and under him. But Christ would try it out with; by dying he takes off the forfeiture to divine justice, and then fairly disputes the title, and recovers it in the court of heaven. Satan's dominion is declared to be a usurpation, and the world adjudged to the Lord Jesus as his right, Psa 2:6, Psa 2:8. The judgment of this world is, that it belongs to Christ, and not to Satan; to Christ therefore let us all atturn tenants.

[2.]That now is the prince of this world cast out. First, It is the devil that is here called the prince of this world, because he rules over the men of the world by the things of the world; he is the ruler of the darkness of this world, that is, of this dark world, of those in it that walk in darkness, Co2 4:4; Eph 4:12. Secondly, He is said to be cast out, to be now cast out; for, whatever had been done hitherto towards the weakening of the devil's kingdom was done in the virtue of a Christ to come, and therefore is said to be done now. Christ, reconciling the world to God by the merit of his death, broke the power of death, and cast out Satan as a destroyer; Christ, reducing the world to God by the doctrine of his cross, broke the power of sin, and cast out Satan as a deceiver. The bruising of his heel was the breaking of the serpent's head, Gen 3:15. When his oracles were silenced, his temples forsaken, his idols famished, and the kingdoms of the world became Christ's kingdoms, then was the prince of the world cast out, as appears by comparing this with John's vision (Rev 12:8-11), where it is said to be done by the blood of the Lamb. Christ's frequent casting of devils out of the bodies of people was an indication of the great design of his whole undertaking. Observe, With what assurance Christ here speaks of the victory over Satan; it is as good as done, and even when he yields to death he triumphs over it.

(2.)That by the death of Christ souls should be converted, and this would be the casting out of Satan (Joh 12:32): If I be lifted up from the earth, I will draw all men unto me. Here observe two things: -

[1.]The great design of our Lord Jesus, which was to draw all men to him, not the Jews only, who had been long in a profession a people near to God, but the Gentiles also, who had been afar off; for he was to be the desire of all nations (Hag 2:7), and to him must the gathering of the people be. That which his enemies dreaded was that the world would go after him; and he would draw them to him, notwithstanding their opposition. Observe here how Christ himself is all in all in the conversion of a soul. First, It is Christ that draws: I will draw. It is sometimes ascribed to the Father (Joh 6:44), but here to the Son, who is the arm of the Lord. He does not drive by force, but draws with the cords of a man (Hos 11:4; Jer 31:3), draws as the loadstone; the soul is made willing, but it is in a day of power. Secondly, It is to Christ that we are drawn: "I will draw them to me as the centre of their unity." The soul that was at a distance from Christ is brought into an acquaintance with him, he that was shy and distrustful of him is brought to love him and trust in him, - drawn up to his terms, into his arms. Christ was now going to heaven, and he would draw men's hearts to him thither.

[2.]The strange method he took to accomplish his design by being lifted up from the earth. What he meant by this, to prevent mistake, we are told (Joh 12:33): This he spoke signifying by what death he should die, the death of the cross, though they had designed and attempted to stone him to death. He that was crucified was first nailed to the cross, and then lifted up upon it. He was lifted up as a spectacle to the world; lifted up between heaven and earth, as unworthy of either; yet the word here used signifies an honourable advancement, ean hupsōthō - If I be exalted; he reckoned his sufferings his honour. Whatever death we die, if we die in Christ we shall be lifted up out of this dungeon, this den of lions, into the regions of light and love. We should learn of our Master to speak of dying with a holy pleasantness, and to say, "We shall then be lifted up." Now Christ's drawing all men to him followed his being lifted up from the earth. First, It followed after it in time. The great increase of the church was after the death of Christ; while Christ lived, we read of thousands at a sermon miraculously fed, but after his death we read of thousands at a sermon added to the church. Israel began to multiply in Egypt after the death of Joseph. Secondly, It followed upon it as a blessed consequence of it. Note, There is a powerful virtue and efficacy in the death of Christ to draw souls to him. The cross of Christ, though to some a stumbling-stone, is to others a loadstone. Some make it an allusion to the drawing of fish into a net; the lifting up of Christ was as the spreading of the net (Mat 13:47, Mat 13:48); or to the setting up of a standard, which draws soldiers together; or, rather, it refers to the lifting up of the brazen serpent in the wilderness, which drew all those to it who were stung with fiery serpents, as soon as ever it was known that it was lifted up, and there was healing virtue in it. O what flocking was there to it! So there was to Christ, when salvation through him was preached to all nations; see Joh 3:14, Joh 3:15. Perhaps it has some reference to the posture in which Christ was crucified, with his arms stretched out, to invite all to him, and embrace all that come. Those that put Christ to that ignominious death thought thereby to drive all men from him; but the devil was outshot in his own bow. Out of the eater came forth meat.

V.The people's exception against what he said, and their cavil at it, Joh 12:34.

Though they had heard the voice from heaven, and the gracious words that proceeded out of his mouth, yet they object, and pick quarrels with him. Christ had called himself the Son of man (Joh 12:23), which they knew to be one of the titles of the Messiah, Dan 7:13. He had also said that the Son of man must be lifted up, which they understood of his dying, and probably he explained himself so, and some think he repeated what he said to Nicodemus (Joh 3:14), So must the Son of man be lifted up. Now against this,

1.They alleged those scriptures of the Old Testament which speak of the perpetuity of the Messiah, that he should be so far from being cut off in the midst of his days that he should be a priest for ever (Psa 110:4), and a king for ever (Psa 89:29, etc.), that he should have length of days for ever and ever, and his years as many generations (Psa 21:4; Psa 61:6), from all which they inferred that the Messiah should not die. Thus great knowledge in the letter of the scripture, if the heart be unsanctified, is capable of being abused to serve the cause of infidelity, and to fight against Christianity with its own weapons. Their perverseness in opposing this to what Jesus had said will appear if we consider,

(1.)That, when they vouched the scripture to prove that the Messiah abideth for ever, they took no notice of those texts which speak of the Messiah's death and sufferings: they had heard out of the law that Messiah abideth for ever; and had they never heard out of the law that Messiah should be cut off (Dan 9:26), and that he should pour out his soul unto death (Isa 53:12), and particularly that his hands and feet should be pierced? Why then do they make so strange of the lifting up of the Son of man? Note, We often run into great mistakes, and then defend them with scripture arguments, by putting those things asunder which God in his word has put together, and opposing one truth under pretence of supporting another. We have heard out of the gospel that which exalts free grace, we have heard also that which enjoins duty, and we just cordially embrace both, and not separate them, nor set them at variance.

(2.)That, when they opposed what Christ said concerning the sufferings of the Son of man, they took no notice of what he had said concerning his glory and exaltation. They had heard out of the law that Christ abideth for ever; and had they not heard our Lord Jesus say that he should be glorified, that he should bring forth much fruit, and draw all men to him? Had he not just now promised immortal honours to his followers, which supposed his abiding for ever? But this they overlooked. Thus unfair disputants oppose some parts of the opinion of an adversary, to which, if they would but take it entire, they could not but subscribe; and in the doctrine of Christ there are paradoxes, which to men of corrupt minds are stones of stumbling - as Christ crucified, and yet glorified; lifted up from the earth, and yet drawing all men to him.

2.They asked hereupon, Who is the Son of man? This they asked, not with a desire to be instructed, but tauntingly and insultingly, as if now they had baffled him, and run him down. "Thou sayest, The Son of man must die; we have proved the Messiah must not, and where is then thy Messiahship? This Son of man, as thou callest thyself, cannot be the Messiah, thou must therefore think of something else to pretend to." Now that which prejudiced them against Christ was his meanness and poverty; they would rather have no Christ than a suffering one.

VI.What Christ said to this exception, or rather what he said upon it.

The objection was a perfect cavil; they might, if they pleased, answer it themselves: man dies, and yet is immortal, and abideth for ever, so the Son of man. Therefore, instead of answering these fools according to their folly, he gives them a serious caution to take heed of trifling away the day of their opportunities in such vain and fruitless cavils as these (Joh 12:35, Joh 12:36): "Yet a little while, and but a little while, is the light with you; therefore be wise for yourselves, and walk while you have the light."

1.In general, we may observe here,

(1.)The concern Christ has for the souls of men, and his desire of their welfare. With what tenderness does he here admonish those to look well to themselves who were contriving ill against him! Even when he endured the contradiction of sinners, he sought their conversion. See Pro 29:10.

(2.)The method he takes with these objectors, with meekness instructing those that opposed themselves, Ti2 2:25. Were but men's consciences awakened with a due concern about their everlasting state, and did they consider how little time they have to spend, and none to spare, they would not waste precious thoughts and time in trifling cavils.

2.Particularly we have here,

(1.)The advantage they enjoyed in having Christ and his gospel among them, with the shortness and uncertainty of their enjoyment of it: Yet a little while is the light with you. Christ is this light; and some of the ancients suggest that, in calling himself the light, he gives a tacit answer to their objection. His dying upon the cross was as consistent with his abiding for ever as the setting of the sun every night is with his perpetuity. The duration of Christ's kingdom is compared to that of the sun and moon, Psa 72:17; Psa 89:36, Psa 89:37. The ordinances of heaven are unchangeably fixed, and yet the sun and moon set and are eclipsed; so Christ the Sun of righteousness abides for ever, and yet was eclipsed by his sufferings, and was but a little while within our horizon. Now,

[1.]The Jews at this time had the light with them; they had Christ's bodily presence, heard his preaching, saw his miracles. The scripture is to us a light shining in a dark place.

[2.]It was to be but a little while with them; Christ would shortly leave them, their visible church state would soon after be dissolved and the kingdom of God taken from them, and blindness and hardness would happen unto Israel. Note, It is good for us all to consider what a little while we are to have the light with us. Time is short, and perhaps opportunity not so long. The candlestick may be removed; at least, we must be removed shortly. Yet a little while is the light of life with us; yet a little while is the light of the gospel with us, the day of grace, the means of grace, the Spirit of grace, yet a very little while.

(2.)The warning given them to make the best of this privilege while they enjoyed it, because of the danger they were in of losing it: Walk while you have the light; as travellers who make the best of their way forward, that they may not be benighted in their journey, because travelling in the night is uncomfortable and unsafe. "Come," say they, "let us mend our pace, and get forward, while we have day-light." Thus wise should we be for our souls who are journeying towards eternity. Note,

[1.]It is our business to walk, to press forward towards heaven, and to get nearer to it by being made fitter for it. Our life is but a day, and we have a day's journey to go.

[2.]The best time of walking is while we have the light. The day is the proper season for work, as the night is for rest. The proper time for getting grace is when we have the word of grace preached to us, and the Spirit of grace striving with us, and therefore then is the time to be busy.

[3.]We are highly concerned thus to improve our opportunities, for fear lest our day be finished before we have finished our day's work and our day's journey: "Lest darkness come upon you, lest you lose your opportunities, and can neither recover them nor despatch the business you have to do without them." Then darkness comes, that is, such an utter incapacity to make sure the great salvation as renders the state of the careless sinner quite deplorable; so that, if his work be undone then, it is likely to be undone for ever.

(3.)The sad condition of those who have sinned away the gospel, and are come to the period of their day of grace. They walk in darkness, and know neither where they go, nor whither they go; neither the way they are walking in, nor the end they are walking towards. He that is destitute of the light of the gospel, and is not acquainted with its discoveries and directions, wanders endlessly in mistakes and errors, and a thousand crooked paths, and is not aware of it. Set aside the instructions of the Christian doctrine, and we know little of the difference between good and evil. He is going to destruction, and knows not his danger, for he is either sleeping or dancing at the pit's brink.

(4.)The great duty and interest of every one of us inferred from all this (Joh 12:36): While you have light, believe in the light. The Jews had now Christ's presence with them, let them improve it; afterwards they had the first offers of the gospel made to them by the apostles wherever they came; now this is an admonition to them not to out-stand their market, but to accept the offer when it was made to them: the same Christ saith to all who enjoy the gospel. Note,

[1.]It is the duty of every one of us to believe in the gospel light, to receive it as a divine light, to subscribe to the truths it discovers, for it is a light to our eyes, and to follow its guidance, for it is a light to our feet. Christ is the light, and we must believe in him as he is revealed to us; as a true light that will not deceive us, a sure light that will not misguide us.

[2.]We are concerned to do this while we have the light, to lay hold on Christ while we have the gospel to show us the way to him and direct us in that way.

[3.]Those that believe in the light shall be the children of light; they shall be owned as Christians, who are called children of light (Luk 16:8; Eph 5:8) and of the day, Th1 5:5. Those that have God for their Father are children of light, for God is light; they are born from above, and heirs of heaven, and children of light, for heaven is light.

VII.Christ's retiring from them, hereupon:

These things spoke Jesus, and said no more at this time, but left this to their consideration, and departed, and did hide himself from them. And this he did,

1.For their conviction and awakening. If they will not regard what he hath said, he will have nothing more to say to them. They are joined to their infidelity, as Ephraim to idols; let them alone. Note, Christ justly removes the means of grace from those that quarrel with him, and hides his face from a froward generation, Deu 32:20.

2.For his own preservation. He hid himself from their rage and fury, retreating, it is probable, to Bethany, where he lodged. By this it appears that what he said irritated and exasperated them, and they were made worse by that which should have made them better.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Two Centuries of Reception

5 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

5 quotes · AD 397–604
Post-NiceneEarly Medieval
400500600

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

How does God speak? Does He have a physical voice? Not at all, but He pours forth oracles with a certain superior power than a physical voice could have. The prophets heard this voice; the faithful hear this voice, but the wicked do not understand. Finally, in the Gospel you have, because the evangelist heard Him saying: "And I have glorified, and will glorify again" (John 12:28); but the Jews did not hear. For they said: "It thundered" (Ibid., 29). So there, just as you have above, because God, who was perceived as walking, did not walk, so God, who did not speak, was heard speaking.
AD 430Augustine of Hippoas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Tr. lii. 4) I have glorified it, i. e. before I made the world; and will glorify it again, i. e. when Thou shalt rise from the dead. Or, I have glorified it, when Thou wast born of a Virgin, didst work miracles, wast made manifest by the Holy Ghost descending in the shape of a dove; and will glorify it again, when Thou shalt rise from the dead, and, as God, be exalted above the heavens, and Thy glory above all the earth.
The people therefore that stood by and heard it, said that it thundered.
"Then came there a voice from heaven, [saying], I have both glorified it, and will glorify it again." "I have both glorified it," before I created the world, "and I will glorify it again," when He shall rise from the dead and ascend into heaven. It may also be otherwise understood. "I have both glorified it," when He was born of the Virgin, when He exercised miraculous powers; when the Magi, guided by a star in the heavens, bowed in adoration before Him; when He was recognized by saints filled with the Holy Spirit; when He was openly proclaimed by the descent of the Spirit in the form of a dove, and pointed out by the voice that sounded from heaven; when He was transfigured on the mount; when He wrought many miracles, cured and cleansed multitudes, fed so vast a number with a very few loaves, commanded the winds and the waves, and raised the dead; "and I will glorify it again;" when He shall rise from the dead; when death shall have no longer dominion over Him; and when He shall be exalted over the heavens as God, and His glory over all the earth.

"The people therefore that stood by, and heard it, said that it thundered: others said, An angel spake to Him. Jesus answered and said, This voice came not because of me, but for your sakes." He thereby showed that the voice made no intimation to Him of what He already knew, but to those who needed the information. And just as that voice was uttered by God, not on His account, but on that of others, so His soul was troubled, not on His own account, but voluntarily for the sake of others.
AD 604Gregory the Dialogistas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Early MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Moral. xxviii.) When God speaks audibly, as He does here, but no visible appearance is seen, He speaks through the medium of a rational creature: i. e. by the voice of an Angel.
AD 604Gregory the DialogistEarly MedievalSourceMORALS ON THE BOOK OF JOB 28.1.4
When God speaks audibly, as he does here, but no visible appearance is seen, he speaks through the medium of a rational creature, that is, by the voice of an angel.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying John 12:29 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.