Skip to content

Job 4:11

“The Doctrine of Retribution”Job 4:7–11

King James Version
The old lion perisheth for lack of prey, and the stout lion's whelps are scattered abroad.

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
The old lion H3918 perisheth H6 for lack H1097 of prey H2964, and the stout lion's H3833 whelps H1121 are scattered abroad H6504.

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
The old lion perishes for lack of prey, and the cubs of the lioness are scattered.

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
The old lion perisheth for lack of prey, And the whelps of the lioness are scattered abroad.

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
The old lion perishes for lack of prey. The cubs of the lioness are scattered abroad.

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
The Lyon perisheth for lacke of pray, and the Lyons whelpes are scattered abroade.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
An old lion is perishing without prey, And the whelps of the lioness do separate.

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
7 Hebrew words
  1. לַיִשׁLa·yisha lionH3918N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absolute
  2. אֹבֵד'o·Ved[is] perishingH6V-Qal-Prtcpl-msVerb Qal Participle Singular Masculine Absolute
  3. מִבְּלִיmi·be·libecause notH1097Prep-m ¦ N-mscNoun Singular Masculine Constructמִbecauseבְּלִיnot
  4. טָרֶףTa·refpreyH2964N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absolute
  5. וּבְנֵיu·ve·Neiand [the] young ofH1121Conj-w ¦ N-mpcNoun Plural Masculine Constructוּandבְנֵי[the] young of
  6. לָבִיאla·Vi'a lionH3833N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absolute
  7. יִתְפָּרָדוּyit·pa·Ra·duthey are scatteredH6504V-Hithpael-Imperf-3mpVerb Hithpael Imperfect 3rd Plural Masculine
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Hebrew, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Hebrew word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Hebrew word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “the LORD” where the gloss reads “Yahweh”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 12,942 of 31,102 · 41.6%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

The old lion starves for lack of prey and the stout lion’s whelps are scattered, as the wicked lose their strength and their line is dispersed.

“The old lion perisheth”

The old lion is layish, and the verb is ʼâbad, the verb of verses 7 and 9.

“for lack of prey,”

bᵉlîy is failure or want, and ṭereph is torn prey. The lion’s might depended on what it could seize.

“and the stout lion’s whelps”

lâbîyʼ and bên, the lion’s sons, its line and its future.

“are scattered abroad.”

The family breaks apart, and the power ends with it.

Passage studyJob 4:7–11

Eliphaz’s Case That Suffering Proves Sin

7Remember, I pray thee, who ever perished, being innocent? or where were the righteous cut off? 8Even as I have seen, they that plow iniquity, and sow wickedness, reap the same. 9By the blast of God they perish, and by the breath of his nostrils are they consumed. 10The roaring of the lion, and the voice of the fierce lion, and the teeth of the young lions, are broken. 11The old lion perisheth for lack of prey, and the stout lion’s whelps are scattered abroad.

Summary

Eliphaz the Temanite, the first of Job’s three friends to speak, asks Job to remember a single innocent man who perished. He has seen, he says, that those who plow iniquity and sow wickedness reap the same, that a breath from God ends them, and that even the strongest lions have their teeth broken and starve for want of prey. Each line is aimed at Job, whose ruin Eliphaz reads as the harvest of hidden sin. What he says about God’s justice and power is true, and Scripture says it in many places. His mistake is to make it a rule that explains every sorrow and to turn it on a man God himself called perfect and upright, and at the end of the book God rebukes him for it.

Eliphaz speaks to a ruined friend

Job has lost his children and his wealth (Job 1), and then his health. His three friends came and sat with him in silence (Job 2:13), and when Job at last spoke, it was to curse the day he was born and long for the peace of death (Job 3). Eliphaz answers first. He is apparently the most respected of the three, and he begins with care, recalling Job’s past wisdom and strength (Job 4:2–6). Then, in verse 7, he comes to the heart of his case, and these five verses set it out.

Eliphaz is a Temanite, most likely from Teman, a city in Edom known for its wise men (Jeremiah 49:7). The book sets Job in the land of Uz, among the men of the east, a people renowned for wisdom. The wisdom of that world tied a person’s conduct closely to his lot in life, so that righteousness brought blessing, prosperity and protection, and wickedness brought judgment and calamity. Eliphaz speaks from inside that understanding, and he believes with all his heart that he is stating a law God has set in the world. He rests it on what he has seen with his own eyes and on a revelation he goes on to describe (Job 4:12–17). His speech fills two chapters and opens the long debate between Job and his friends that runs from Job 4 through Job 31.

We hear him with knowledge he lacks. The book opens by calling Job “perfect and upright, and one that feared God, and eschewed evil” (Job 1:1), and God himself says the same of him (Job 1:8). Job’s suffering came as a test of that integrity, in a scene hidden from everyone on earth. So the man Eliphaz is quietly accusing is himself the living answer to Eliphaz’s rule, and that irony runs under every line of these verses.

Who ever perished, being innocent?

Eliphaz asks this sure that Job will search his memory and come back empty-handed. “Remember, I pray thee” is courteous, and it appeals both to Job’s own memory and to what everyone has observed. The question is rhetorical. It asserts what Eliphaz takes to be self-evident, and because it presumes agreement, anyone who answers otherwise has to prove his case. The second line, “or where were the righteous cut off?”, says the same again in other words, as Hebrew poetry often does, and the repetition presses his conviction home.

Each word carries weight. “Perished” is ʼâbad, which properly means to wander away or lose oneself, and so to be lost or to perish. Scripture uses it of lost animals and lost property as well as of people, and here it means a man’s complete ruin. The same verb comes back in verse 9, where the wicked perish by the blast of God, and in verse 11, where the old lion perisheth, and it ties the argument together: the innocent are kept, and the wicked perish. “Innocent” is nâqîy, clean, guiltless or exempt, the man free of guilt. “Righteous” here is yâshâr, straight or upright, the man whose life runs true to God’s ways. “Cut off” is kâchad, a verb that can mean to hide or conceal and, in its strong sense, to destroy or cut down. Here it is the end of a man’s life, family or prosperity, which is exactly what Job has just suffered.

Eliphaz means the question as a gentle accusation. If the innocent are always kept from ruin, then a ruined man must be guilty, and his way back is to confess his sin and seek God. This is the premise from which all three friends argue, and the rest of the book takes it apart. It contradicts what God has said of Job, and the man listening to it is the proof.

They that plow iniquity reap the same

“Even as I have seen” grounds the argument in experience. Eliphaz speaks as a man who has watched this law at work through a lifetime, and that gives his words the ring of certainty.

He then draws on the farming that everyone around him knew. To plow is chârash, a verb meaning to engrave or plow, and used figuratively, as here, plowing stands for setting wrong things in motion. What is plowed is iniquity, ʼāwen, a word for trouble and sorrow as well as for wickedness. To sow is zâraʻ, to scatter seed, and figuratively to spread something abroad. What is sown is wickedness, ʻāmâl, which can mean toil, trouble or mischief, often of an oppressive kind. The two lines say nearly the same thing, and both describe people who go about evil on purpose. Then comes the harvest. To reap is qâtsar, a verb that means to cut short and so to harvest grain, and “reap the same” (qāṣar ʼōtô) means that the crop is of the same kind as the seed. Those who sow trouble harvest trouble.

This is a truth Scripture teaches again and again. “He that soweth iniquity shall reap vanity” (Proverbs 22:8). “For they have sown the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind” (Hosea 8:7). Paul writes, “Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap”, and goes on to set sowing to the flesh, which reaps corruption, beside sowing to the Spirit, which reaps life everlasting (Galatians 6:7–8). Sin has bitter results, both as the natural fruit of wrong choices and as the work of a just God who made his world with a moral order in it.

Eliphaz’s error lies in the direction he reads the principle. He starts from the harvest. Job’s ruin is plain to see, so Eliphaz reasons back to a seed of wickedness that he has to suppose. The principle tells us where sin leads, and the book of Job shows that sorrow can also grow from other roots than the sufferer’s own sin.

The blast of God

Verse 9 says what becomes of the people of verse 8. “Blast” is nᵉshâmâh, a word for breath, a puff of wind, the vital breath of a living thing, even divine inspiration. Here it is a hot, forceful blast, like a scorching wind, and it is enough to end them. They “perish”, the same ʼâbad as verse 7, and they are “consumed”, kâlâh, a verb that means to end, cease, be finished or consume. The wicked are brought to an end.

“The breath of his nostrils” speaks of God in human terms. God is Spirit, and speaking of his nostrils makes his anger near and real to us. The point is the ease of it, since a single breath from God is all it takes. Scripture speaks of his power this way elsewhere. “At the blast of the breath of thy nostrils” the foundations of the world were laid bare (Psalm 18:15), the promised King will slay the wicked “with the breath of his lips” (Isaiah 11:4), and the Lord will consume the lawless one “with the spirit of his mouth” and destroy him “with the brightness of his coming” (2 Thessalonians 2:8).

Is Eliphaz wrong about God’s power?

What Eliphaz says about God’s power is true. God can bring wickedness to an end with a breath, and Scripture affirms his judgment on sin again and again: “God judgeth the righteous, and God is angry with the wicked every day” (Psalm 7:11–12). His mistake lies elsewhere. He assumes that every suffering is a direct, immediate and visible punishment for the sufferer’s own sin, and then he applies that to Job.

The lions are broken

In verses 10 and 11 Eliphaz turns to a picture. In his world the lion was the great symbol of strength, ferocity and royal authority, and kings and rulers were often pictured as lions, sometimes with their tyranny in view. Lions lived in the dry lands around Teman, so his hearers would feel the force of it. Here the lions stand for the wicked in their power, the oppressors who prey on others.

Verse 10 piles up three ways of naming a lion and three marks of its power. The “roaring” is shᵉʼâgâh, the deep sound a lion makes to terrify its prey, and in the picture it stands for the boasts and threats of the powerful. The “fierce lion” is shachal, a word for the lion used in poetry, probably from a root meaning to roar, and its “voice” adds to the menace. The “young lions” (kᵉphirim) are active hunters, and their teeth are the real means of harm. One verb governs all three: “are broken”. It is nâthaʻ, in a passive form, “broken” or “torn out”. A lion whose teeth are torn out is harmless, however loudly it roars.

Verse 11 carries the picture to its end. The “old lion” (layish) “perisheth”, once more ʼâbad, “for lack of prey”. “Lack” is bᵉlîy, a word for failure or want, used to mean “without”, and “prey” is ṭereph, something torn, so prey or food, and elsewhere even a fresh leaf. The great beast dies because the supply it lived on has failed. Its strength always depended on what it could seize, and when God cuts that off, its strength fails with it. Then “the stout lion’s whelps are scattered abroad”. “Stout lion” is lâbîyʼ, and “whelps” is bên, the ordinary word for “son”, so these are the lion’s sons. The judgment reaches past the old lion to its offspring and to all that would carry on its power.

The Psalms pray in the same images. “Break their teeth, O God, in their mouth” (Psalm 58:6). “Thou hast broken the teeth of the ungodly” (Psalm 3:7). “Break thou the arm of the wicked and the evil man” (Psalm 10:15). The wicked man digs a pit and falls into it himself, and his mischief returns on his own head (Psalm 7:15–16). The ungodly are like chaff that the wind drives away, and “the way of the ungodly shall perish” (Psalm 1:4–6). “As the whirlwind passeth, so is the wicked no more” (Proverbs 10:25), and “the destruction of the transgressors and of the sinners shall be together” (Isaiah 1:28). Psalm 73 looks from the prosperity of the wicked to their end. God sees those who devour others, he defends the oppressed, and in his own time he breaks the strength of the oppressor.

Why does Eliphaz speak of lions?

Eliphaz speaks of lions because the lion was the strongest and most feared creature his hearers knew, and so it pictures the wicked at the height of their power. By naming several kinds of lion he can show the oppressor’s threats, his loud claims to rule and his real power to harm, and then show all of it broken. The fiercer the beast, the clearer it is that its fall is God’s doing.

Was Eliphaz right about Job?

Eliphaz spoke true things about God and drew a false verdict about Job. Sowing and reaping are real, God does judge the wicked, and the power of oppressors is broken in the end. Wisdom says, “Behold, the righteous shall be recompensed in the earth: much more the wicked and the sinner” (Proverbs 11:31). Eliphaz takes this measure of truth about how God governs his world and hardens it into a law that holds in every single case. Then he reads it backwards, from Job’s suffering to Job’s sin.

The rest of Scripture makes room for what his rule forbids. A psalmist watched the wicked prosper while he himself was plagued all day long (Psalm 73:3–14), and Jeremiah asked the LORD, “Wherefore doth the way of the wicked prosper?” (Jeremiah 12:1). When the disciples asked whose sin had made a man blind, Jesus answered, “Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents: but that the works of God should be made manifest in him” (John 9:1–3). In a fallen world suffering comes for many reasons, among them spiritual warfare, the testing of faith, the refining of character and the showing of God’s glory. Paul writes that “tribulation worketh patience; And patience, experience; and experience, hope” (Romans 5:3–5). God’s thoughts and ways are higher than ours (Isaiah 55:8–9), and when he answers Job out of the whirlwind (Job 38–41), he shows a wisdom far above anything the friends had grasped.

Job 1 has already told us why Job suffered: his integrity was being tested. At the end of the book the LORD says to Eliphaz, “My wrath is kindled against thee, and against thy two friends: for ye have not spoken of me the thing that is right, as my servant Job hath” (Job 42:7). Eliphaz’s confident system broke down on the very case it was meant to explain.

The innocent one who was cut off

Eliphaz asks, “who ever perished, being innocent?” and the gospel answers with one name. Jesus, “the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29), was wholly innocent, and he was “cut off out of the land of the living” (Isaiah 53:8). He died for the sins of others: “For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him” (2 Corinthians 5:21). His death answers Eliphaz’s premise once for all, and his resurrection is the final vindication of the righteous.

Verse 8 finds its fulfilment in him too. Sinless himself, he reaped the harvest of our sin on the cross, where the sentence Paul names fell on him: “For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord” (Romans 6:23). By his resurrection he opened a new harvest of forgiveness and life. Those who belong to him now sow to the Spirit, as Paul says in Galatians, and in them the righteousness of the law is fulfilled (Romans 8:4).

The blast of verse 9 points to him as well. He bore God’s wrath against sin on the cross, so that “we shall be saved from wrath through him” (Romans 5:9). The breath of God that ends the wicked is also the breath of life, and the risen Jesus “breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost” (John 20:22). At his coming the same Lord will destroy the lawless one by the breath of his mouth.

The lions of verse 10 find their great example in the devil, who “as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour” (1 Peter 5:8). At the cross Christ “spoiled principalities and powers” (Colossians 2:15), and for those united to him by faith the adversary’s teeth are broken, with his power to accuse and condemn taken away. “The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death” (1 Corinthians 15:26).

And where the old lion’s whelps are scattered, Christ gathers his own. He is “the Lion of the tribe of Judah” (Revelation 5:5), and he conquered by giving himself as the sacrifice for sin. He feeds his people as the bread of life (John 6:35) and gives them living water (John 4:10), so that his own are fed for ever, where the old lion starved for lack of prey.

True words spoken to a sufferer

These verses give us real comfort about God. He sees the plowing and sowing of the wicked, his breath ends them, and the teeth of every oppressor will be broken in his time. Those who suffer under cruelty have his word that the lion’s strength is temporary.

They also show how true words can wound. Eliphaz came to comfort his friend, and he arrived with a theory that had already decided Job was guilty. The book that records his speech also records God’s verdict on it, and it teaches that compassion sits with the sufferer in humility, with prayer and steady presence, trusting God’s justice and goodness even where his reasons are hidden. The principle of sowing and reaping that Eliphaz misused still speaks to our own lives, where it calls us to look at what we ourselves are sowing, while the judging of other people’s sorrows belongs to God.

Above all, the passage shows us a God whose justice is sure and whose ways are higher than ours, who let his own innocent Son be cut off so that the guilty might live.

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Job 4:7–11. He set out his notes in a four-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 5 verses
Passage under commentJob 4:7–11
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

Eliphaz here advances another argument to prove Job a hypocrite, and will have not only his impatience under his afflictions to be evidence against him but even his afflictions themselves, being so very great and extraordinary, and there being no prospect at all of his deliverance out of them. To strengthen his argument he here lays down these two principles, which seem plausible enough: -

I.That good men were never thus ruined.

For the proof of this he appeals to Job's own observation (Job 4:7): "Remember, I pray thee; recollect all that thou hast seen, heard, or read, and give me an instance of any one that was innocent and righteous, and yet perished as thou dost, and was cut off as thou art." If we understand it of a final and eternal destruction, his principle is true. None that are innocent and righteous perish for ever: it is only a man of sin that is a son of perdition, 2 Thessalonians 2:3. But then it is ill applied to Job; he did not thus perish, nor was he cut off: a man is never undone till he is in hell. But, if we understand it of any temporal calamity, his principle is not true. The righteous perish (Isaiah 57:1): there is one event both to the righteous and to the wicked (Ecclesiastes 9:2), both in life and death; the great and certain difference is after death. Even before Job's time (as early as it was) there were instances sufficient to contradict this principle. Did not righteous Abel perish being innocent? and was he not cut off in the beginning of his days? Was not righteous Lot burnt out of house and harbour, and forced to retire to a melancholy cave? Was not righteous Jacob a Syrian ready to perish? Deuteronomy 26:5. Other such instances, no doubt, there were, which are not on record.

II.That wicked men were often thus ruined.

For the proof of this he vouches his own observation (Job 4:8): "Even as I have seen, many a time, those that plough iniquity, and sow wickedness, reap accordingly; by the blast of God they perish, Job 4:9. We have daily instances of that; and therefore, since thou dost thus perish and art consumed, we have reason to think that, whatever profession of religion thou hast made, thou hast but ploughed iniquity and sown wickedness. Even as I have seen in others, so do I see in thee."

1.He speaks of sinners in general, politic busy sinners, that take pains in sin, for they plough iniquity; and expect gain by sin, for they sow wickedness. Those that plough plough in hope, but what is the issue? They reap the same. They shall of the flesh reap corruption and ruin, Galatians 6:7, Galatians 6:8. The harvest will be a heap in the day of grief and desperate sorrow, Isaiah 17:11. He shall reap the same, that is, the proper product of that seedness. That which the sinner sows, he sows not that body that shall be, but God will give it a body, a body of death, the end of those things, Romans 6:21. Some, by iniquity and wickedness, understand wrong and injury done to others. Those who plough and sow them shall reap the same, that is, they shall be paid in their own coin. Those who are troublesome shall be troubled, 2 Thessalonians 1:6; Joshua 7:25. The spoilers shall be spoiled (Isaiah 33:1), and those that led captive shall go captive, Revelation 13:10. He further describes their destruction (Job 4:9): By the blast of God they perish. The projects they take so much pains in are defeated; God cuts asunder the cords of those ploughers, Psalm 129:3, Psalm 129:4. They themselves are destroyed, which is the just punishment of their iniquity. They perish, that is, they are destroyed utterly; they are consumed, that is, they are destroyed gradually; and this by the blast and breath of God, that is,

(1.)By his wrath. His anger is the ruin of sinners, who are therefore called vessels of wrath, and his breath is said to kindle Tophet, Isaiah 30:33. Who knows the power of his anger? Psalm 90:11.

(2.)By his word. He speaks and it is done, easily and effectually. The Spirit of God, in the word, consumes sinners; with that he slays them, Hosea 6:5. Saying and doing are not two things with God. The man of sin is said to be consumed with the breath of Christ's mouth, 2 Thessalonians 2:8. Compare Isaiah 11:4; Revelation 19:21. Some think that in attributing the destruction of sinners to the blast of God, and the breath of his nostrils, he refers to the wind which blew the house down upon Job's children, as if they were therefore sinners above all men because they suffered such things. Luke 13:2.

2.He speaks particularly of tyrants and cruel oppressors, under the similitude of lions, Job 4:10, Job 4:11. Observe,

(1.)How he describes their cruelty and oppression. The Hebrew tongue has five several names for lions, and they are all here used to set forth the terrible tearing power, fierceness, and cruelty, of proud oppressors. They roar, and rend, and prey upon all about them, and bring up their young ones to do so too, Ezekiel 19:3. The devil is a roaring lion; and they partake of his nature, and do his lusts. They are strong as lions, and subtle (Psalm 10:9; Psalm 17:12); and, as far as they prevail, they lay all desolate about them.

(2.)How he describes their destruction, the destruction both of their power and of their persons. They shall be restrained from doing further hurt and reckoned with for the hurt they have done. An effectual course shall be taken,

[1.]That they shall not terrify. The voice of their roaring shall be stopped.

[2.]That they shall not tear. God will disarm them, will take away their power to do hurt: The teeth of the young lions are broken. See Psalm 3:7. Thus shall the remainder of wrath be restrained.

[3.]That they shall not enrich themselves with the spoil of their neighbours. Even the old lion is famished, and perishes for lack of prey. Those that have surfeited on spoil and rapine are perhaps reduced to such straits as to die of hunger at last.

[4.]That they shall not, as they promise themselves, leave a succession: The stout lion's whelps are scattered abroad, to seek for food themselves, which the old ones used to bring in for them, Nahum 2:12. The lion did tear in pieces for his whelps, but now they must shift for themselves. Perhaps Eliphaz intended, in this, to reflect upon Job, as if he, being the greatest of all the men of the east, had got his estate by spoil and used his power in oppressing his neighbours, but now his power and estate were gone, and his family was scattered: if so, it was a pity that a man whom God praised should be thus abused.

Historical interpretation

Four Centuries of Reception

4 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

4 quotes · AD 407–850
Post-NiceneEarly Medieval
400500600700800

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

d. AD 407John ChrysostomPost-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON JOB 4:10
The writer mentions natural things, that is, nothing that is new or unusual. Certain laws regulate everything, and nothing has changed. Indeed, if what concerns wild beasts remains the same, even more so what concerns us remains unchanged. If it is not possible to restrain “the strength of the lion,” then the righteous also cannot be prevented from talking frankly. In fact, as the wild beast naturally possesses strength, so also the righteous person possesses a natural power and force. Actually it is more likely for a lion to become weak than for a righteous person to allow others to manipulate him.
d. AD 604Gregory the DialogistEarly Medieval
43. By the title of a ‘tiger’ he again represents him, whom he formerly designated by the name of a ‘lion.’ For Satan both for his cruelty is called ‘a lion,’ and for the variousness of his manifold cunning he is not unsuitably designated ‘a tiger.’ For one while he presents himself to man's senses lost as he is, one while he exhibits himself as an Angel of light, Now by caressing he works upon the minds of the foolish sort, now by striking terror he forces them to commit sin. At one time he labours to win men to evil ways without disguise, at another time he cloaks himself in his promptings under the garb of virtue. This beast, then, which is so variously spotted, is rightly called ‘a tiger,’ being with the LXX called an ‘Ant-lion,’ as we have said above. Which same creature, as we have before shown, hiding itself in the dust kills the ants carrying their corn, in that the Apostate Angel, being cast out of heaven upon the earth, in the very pathway of their practice besets the minds of the righteous, providing for themselves the provender of good works, and whilst he overcomes them by his snares, he as it were kills by surprise the ants carrying their grains. And he is rightly called ‘Ant-lion,’ i.e. ‘a lion and ant.’ For as we have said, to the ants he is ‘a lion,’ but to the birds of the air, ‘an ant,’ in that our old enemy, as he is strong to encounter those that yield to him, is weak against such as resist him. For if consent be yielded to his persuasions, like a lion he can never be sustained, but if resistance be offered, like an ant he is ground in the dust. Therefore to some he is ‘a lion,’ to others ‘an ant,’ in that carnal minds sustain his cruel assaults with difficulty, but spiritual minds trample upon his weakness with virtue's foot. Heretics then, because they are full of pride by pretension to sanctity, say as it were in exultation, The Ant-lion, or probably, the tiger perisheth for lack of prey. As though the words were plainly expressed, ‘The old foe has no prey in us, in that, as far as regards our purposes, he already lies defeated.’ Now it is for this reason that he is again mentioned under the title of ‘an Ant lion,’ or of ‘a tiger,’ who had been already set forth by the ‘roaring of the lion broken,’ because whatever is said in joy, is repeated over and over. For when the mind is full of exultation, it redoubles the expressions. And hence the Psalmist, from true joy, frequently repeats this, that he was assured that he had been heard, saying, the Lord hath heard the voice of my weeping. The Lord hath heard my supplications. The Lord hath received my prayer. [Ps. 6, 8. 9.]
44. But when holy men are glad of heart that they have been rescued from some evil habits, they possess [Lit. ‘shake’] themselves with great fear even in that very gladness. For though they be now rescued from the commotion of any single storm, yet they call to mind that they are still tossing in the treacherous waves of an uncertain sea, and they so exult in hope that they tremble in fear, and so tremble in fear that they exult in confidence of hope. Whence it is said by the same Psalmist, Serve the Lord with fear, and rejoice with trembling. [Ps. 2, 11] But on the other hand, they, whom a specious show of sanctity fills with big thoughts, when they get the better of any one evil habit, immediately erect their heart in pride, and as it were glory in the perfection of their lives, and for this, that perchance they have been once snatched from the perils of the storm, they already forget that they are still at sea, they look upon themselves as great in all things, and imagine that they have wholly overcome their old adversary; they regard all men below them, in that they believe that their wisdom places them above all. Whence it is added;
Now a secret word was spoken to me.
45. ‘A secret word,’ heretics pretend to hear, that they may bring a certain reverence for their preaching over their hearers' minds. And hence they preach with a secret meaning, that their preaching may seem to be holy, in proportion as it is at the same time hidden. Now they are loath to have a common sort of knowledge, lest they should be placed on a par with the rest of their fellow-creatures, and they are ever making out new things, which whilst others know nothing of, they plume their own selves on the preeminence of their knowledge before inexperienced minds. And this knowledge, as we have said, they teach is occult; for, that they may be able to show it to be wonderful, they affirm that they obtained it by secret means. Hence with Solomon the woman, bearing the semblance of heretics, says, Stolen waters are [Vulg.] sweeter, and bread eaten in secret is more pleasant. [Prov. 9, 17] Whence in this place too it is added;
And mine ear as it were by stealth received the veins [Vulg.] of the whispering thereof.
They ‘receive the veins of whispers by stealth,’ in that abandoning the grace of knowledge in fellowship, they do not enter thereinto by the door, as the Lord witnesses, Who saith, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber; But he that entereth in by the door is the shepherd of the sheep. [John 10, 1. 2.] Therefore he ‘receives the veins of divine whispers by stealth,’ who, whilst the door of public preaching for receiving the knowledge of His excellency is forsaken, searches out the gaps and chinks of a froward understanding. But because the thief and robber, who enters by another way, both loves the darkness, and abhors the clearness of the light.
d. AD 604Gregory the DialogistEarly Medieval
39. For whom does he denote by the name of ‘tiger’ but blessed Job, marked with the stamp of changeableness or covered with the spots of dissimulation? For every dissembler, in that he desires to appear righteous, can never show himself pure in all things; for while he assumes some virtues in hypocrisy, and secretly gives way to vicious habits, some concealed vices speedily break out upon the surface, and exhibit the hide of overlaid hypocrisy, like a coat for sight, varied with their admixture, so that it is very often a marvel how one, who is seen to be master of such great virtues, should be at the same time stained with such damnable deeds. But truly every hypocrite is a tiger, in that while he derives a pure colour from pretence, it is striped with the intermediate blackness of vicious habits. For it often happens that while he is extolled for pureness of chastity, he renders himself foul by the stain of avarice. Often while he makes a fair show by the good quality of bountifulness, he is stained with spots of lust. Often while he is clad in the bright array of bountifulness and chastity, he is blackened by ferociousness in cruelty, as if from a zealous sense of justice. Often he is arrayed in bounty, chastity, pitifulness, in a fair outside, but is marked with the interspersed darkness of pride. And thus it comes to pass, that whereas by the intermixture of vicious habits, the hypocrite does not present an unstained appearance in himself, the tiger, as it were, cannot be of one colour. And this same ‘tiger’ seizes the prey, in that he usurps to himself the glory of human applause. For he, that is lifted up by usurped praise, is as it were glutted with the prey. And it is well that the applause that hypocrites have is called ‘prey.’ For it is nought else than a prey, when the things of another are taken away by violence. Now every hypocrite, in that by counterfeiting the life of righteousness he seizes for himself the praise that belongs to the righteous, does in truth carry off what is another's. Thus Eliphaz, who knew that blessed Job had walked in ways worthy to be praised in the period of his wellbeing, concluded from the stroke that came after that he had maintained these in hypocrisy, saying, The tiger perisheth for lack of prey. As if he had said plainly, ‘The shifting of thine hypocrisy is at end, because the homage of applause is also taken from thee, and thine hypocrisy is in ‘lack of prey,’ in that being stricken by the hand of God, it lacks the favourable regards of man.’
40. But in the translation of the Septuagint, it is not said ‘the tiger,’ but ‘the Myrmicoleon perisheth for lack of prey.’ For the Myrmicoleon is a very little creature, a foe to ants, which hides itself under the dust, and kills the ants laden with grains, and devours them thus destroyed. Now ‘Myrmicoleon’ is rendered in the Latin tongue either ‘the ants' lion,’ or indeed more exactly ‘an ant and lion at once.’ Now it is lightly called ‘an ant and lion;’ in that with reference to winged creatures, or to any other small-sized animals, it is an ant, but with reference to the ants themselves it is a lion. For it devours these like a lion, yet by the other sort it is devoured like an ant. When then Eliphaz says, the Ant-lion perisheth, what does he censure in blessed Job under the title of ‘Ant-lion’ but his fearfulness and audacity? As if he said to him in plain words, ‘Thou art not unjustly stricken, in that thou hast shown thyself a coward towards the lofty, a bully towards those beneath thee.’ As though he had said in plain terms, ‘Fear made thee crouch towards the crafty sort, hardihood swelled thee full towards the simple folk, but ‘the Ant-lion’ no longer hath prey,’ in that thy cowardly self elation, being beaten down with blows, is stayed from doing injury to others.’ But forasmuch as we have said that the friends of blessed Job contain a figure of Heretics, there is a pressing necessity to show how these same words of Eliphaz are to be understood in a typical sense likewise.
d. AD 850Ishodad of MervEarly MedievalSourceCOMMENTARY ON JOB 4:10
The author signifies by “the lion” those powerful men who inspire people with fear, as lions do. By “lioness” he means their wives, who were evil and inspired fear simply by speaking. In the same manner, their children were arrogant and quite cruel. All these have perished. They were extinguished instantly.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying Job 4:11 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8