Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
She is hardened against her young ones, as though they were not hers: her labour is in vain without fear;
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
She is hardened H7188 against her young ones H1121, as though they were not H3808 hers: her labour H3018 is in vain H7385 without fear H6343;
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
It treats its chicks heartlessly, as if they were not its own; even if her labor is in vain, it really doesn't care;
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
She treats her young harshly, as if not her own, with no concern that her labor was in vain.
Ask
American Standard Version
She dealeth hardly with her young ones, as if they were not hers: Though her labor be in vain, she is without fear;
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
She deals harshly with her young ones, as if they were not hers. Though her labor is in vain, she is without fear,
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Hast thou giuen the pleasant wings vnto the peacockes? or winges and feathers vnto the ostriche?
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Her young ones it hath hardened without her, In vain is her labour without fear.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Job 39:16, part of God's majestic discourse to Job, vividly portrays the ostrich's seemingly counter-intuitive lack of maternal instinct. It describes her as "hardened against her young ones" and her "labour is in vain without fear," highlighting a behavior that appears indifferent to the survival of her offspring. This peculiar characteristic of a creature designed by God serves as a profound illustration of divine wisdom and sovereignty, challenging human perceptions of what is logical or ideal, and underscoring the inscrutable nature of God's creative design.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is deeply embedded within God's monumental discourse to Job, delivered from the whirlwind, spanning Job 38 through Job 41. This divine interrogation is meticulously designed to humble Job and profoundly expand his understanding of God's omnipotence, wisdom, and sovereign control over all creation. Prior to describing the ostrich, God details other magnificent, untamed wild creatures like the wild goat and the wild ass, establishing a pattern of showcasing nature's wonders that defy human control or full comprehension. Job 39:13-18 specifically focuses on the ostrich, presenting its unique characteristics, including its remarkable speed and, strikingly, its reproductive habits. The portrayal of the ostrich's seemingly detached parenting in this verse serves as a powerful rhetorical device, illustrating that God's design often transcends human comprehension and conventional wisdom, thereby reinforcing His absolute sovereignty over all creation—a truth Job later humbly acknowledges in Job 40:4 and Job 42:1-6.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In the ancient Near East, the ostrich (ya'anah) was a known inhabitant of the vast desert and semi-arid regions, particularly in areas bordering the Levant. Ancient observers would have noted their distinct reproductive strategy: laying eggs directly in the sand, often relying on the sun's heat for incubation, and sometimes appearing to leave the nest unattended. While modern zoology understands the complex nuances of ostrich parenting (e.g., communal nests, the male's significant role in incubation, and the vulnerability of ground nests to predators), the biblical description reflects the perception of this behavior from a human vantage point in antiquity. The apparent lack of constant, vigilant care, especially when compared to the diligent nesting habits of many other bird species, would have seemed counter-intuitive and even neglectful. This perceived behavior thus provided a striking and effective example for God's argument about His inscrutable wisdom in designing creatures whose ways defy human expectations and logic, serving to humble Job and his limited understanding.
  • Key Themes: The primary theme powerfully underscored by this verse is the Divine Wisdom and Sovereignty of God. The ostrich's peculiar behavior, seemingly illogical or even flawed from a human perspective, serves as a profound testament to God's infinite wisdom and absolute control over His creation. It challenges Job's (and humanity's) presumption that all of creation should conform to human reason or ideal standards, echoing the sentiment found in Proverbs 3:19. Secondly, the passage highlights the Paradoxical Nature of Creation. The ostrich is presented as a creature of immense power and speed, capable of outrunning a horse and rider as described in Job 39:18, yet simultaneously described as lacking a fundamental instinct like maternal care. This paradox showcases the diverse, sometimes perplexing, and often awe-inspiring ways God orchestrates life. Finally, the description reinforces the theme of Human Limited Understanding. God's detailed, sometimes counter-intuitive, descriptions of His creatures are designed to humble Job, reminding him of the vast chasm between finite human knowledge and infinite divine omniscience, a central point of God's entire discourse in Job 38-41.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Hardened (Hebrew, qâshach', H7188): This root signifies to be or become unfeeling, severe, or stubborn. In the context of the ostrich in Job 39:16, it denotes an emotional hardening, an unnatural lack of tenderness, empathy, or protective instinct towards her own offspring. It implies an unyielding indifference that goes against typical maternal care observed in many other species, from the perspective of the ancient observer.
  • Young ones (Hebrew, bên', H1121): This word broadly refers to a son, child, or offspring. Here, it specifically denotes the ostrich's chicks or eggs, emphasizing the vulnerable nature of her progeny. The verse's point is the ostrich's perceived disregard for these vulnerable "young ones," highlighting the striking contrast between her powerful physical attributes and her apparent lack of parental care.
  • Fear (Hebrew, pachad', H6343): This word commonly means dread, terror, or alarm. However, in this specific context, it refers not to a feeling of fright but to the absence of a natural, instinctual protective caution or concern for the safety and well-being of her young. It implies a lack of the innate vigilance and apprehension of danger that would typically ensure the survival of offspring, making her reproductive efforts seem futile.

Verse Breakdown

  • "She is hardened against her young ones": This clause vividly portrays the ostrich's perceived lack of natural maternal affection. The term "hardened" suggests an emotional detachment or a severe indifference, implying a deliberate or instinctual disregard for the vulnerability and needs of her offspring, contrary to what might be expected of a parent. It sets the stage for the subsequent explanation of this unusual behavior.
  • "as though [they were] not hers": This powerful simile intensifies the previous statement, emphasizing the extreme nature of the ostrich's apparent neglect. It highlights a profound disconnect, as if the offspring bear no biological or emotional relation to her. This underscores the severity of her perceived abandonment or lack of protective care, making her behavior particularly striking and counter-intuitive to the human observer.
  • "her labour is in vain without fear;": This final clause explains the consequence of the ostrich's "hardening" and lack of "fear." The "labour" refers to the significant effort of laying and potentially incubating eggs. This effort is deemed "in vain" because, without the necessary protective instinct or "fear" (i.e., vigilant care and concern for their safety), the young are exposed to dangers and likely perish, rendering the entire reproductive endeavor fruitless from a human perspective.

Literary Devices

Job 39:16 employs several potent literary devices to convey its message effectively. Personification is evident in the description of the ostrich as "hardened against her young ones" and her "labour is in vain without fear." While these are observations of animal behavior, the language attributes human-like emotional states (or their absence, specifically a lack of tenderness and protective instinct) and moral implications (the absence of "fear" as a responsible, protective instinct) to the creature. The Simile "as though [they were] not hers" vividly amplifies the perceived detachment, making the ostrich's behavior more striking and counter-intuitive to the human observer. Furthermore, the entire description of the ostrich contributes to a broader Paradox within God's discourse: a creature endowed with immense strength and speed (Job 39:18) is simultaneously presented as lacking a fundamental, seemingly essential, parental instinct. This paradox serves God's larger Rhetorical Argument by Design, using the seemingly inexplicable aspects of His creation to humble Job and demonstrate the unfathomable depth of divine wisdom that transcends human understanding and expectations.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

This verse profoundly underscores the theological truth of God's transcendent wisdom and absolute sovereignty over all creation. It challenges the human tendency to impose our understanding of "good" or "logical" design upon God's intricate works. The ostrich's peculiar behavior, as observed and described in the ancient world, forces Job—and us—to confront the inherent limits of human knowledge and to humbly acknowledge that God's ways are often beyond our full comprehension. It is a powerful reminder that God's design, even in its seemingly paradoxical or inexplicable elements, is perfect in His eyes, serving His purposes, and ultimately revealing His glory, rather than conforming to our finite expectations. This passage thus cultivates a posture of humility, awe, and profound trust before the Creator, encouraging us to worship Him for His unsearchable wisdom.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Job 39:16 invites us to a profound reflection on the nature of divine wisdom and our place within God's vast, often mysterious, creation. While the ostrich's behavior might appear counter-intuitive or even flawed from a human perspective, the passage compels us to trust in God's perfect design, even when His reasons are beyond our grasp. It serves as a powerful antidote to human intellectual pride, fostering a posture of humility and awe before the Creator. For believers, this verse encourages a deeper faith that God's plan is always good, even when circumstances or natural phenomena seem inexplicable or contrary to our expectations. Furthermore, by presenting a stark contrast to ideal parental care, it subtly underscores the profound importance of diligence, protection, and unconditional love in human familial relationships, reminding us of the sacred responsibility entrusted to parents as stewards of God's most precious gifts. It challenges us to consider how we might better reflect God's own perfect care in our relationships and responsibilities.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the description of the ostrich's behavior challenge my assumptions about what constitutes "good" or "logical" design in creation?
  • What does this passage teach me about the limits of human understanding when contemplating God's works and ways?
  • In what areas of my life do I struggle to trust God's wisdom when His path or design seems counter-intuitive or difficult to comprehend?
  • Considering the contrast, what principles of diligent care and responsibility, particularly in parenting or stewardship, can I glean from this seemingly negative example?

FAQ

Is the Bible's description of the ostrich in Job 39:16 scientifically accurate about its parenting?

Answer: The Bible's description reflects the ancient observer's perception of ostrich behavior, not a modern scientific treatise. Ostriches do lay eggs directly in the sand, and while both parents participate in incubation (the male often at night, female during the day), the nests can appear unattended and are vulnerable to predators or environmental shifts. To ancient observers, accustomed to other birds' constant vigilance over their nests, this behavior might have seemed neglectful or "hardened." God uses this apparent lack of care as a powerful rhetorical device to highlight His own inscrutable wisdom and sovereignty in creation, not to provide a comprehensive zoological report. The point is not the ostrich's precise parenting ability, but God's ability to design creatures whose ways defy human expectations and logic, ultimately humbling Job and demonstrating divine authority over all creation, as seen throughout Job 38-41.

What is the meaning of "her labour is in vain without fear" in this context?

Answer: The "fear" (Hebrew: pachad) here does not primarily mean terror or fright in the sense of being scared. Instead, it refers to a lack of natural, instinctual protective caution, vigilance, or concern for her offspring's safety. The ostrich's "labour" (the significant effort of laying and potentially incubating eggs) is considered "in vain" because, without this crucial protective instinct, her young are highly vulnerable to predators or environmental hazards and are likely to perish. This absence of innate, diligent care renders her reproductive efforts fruitless from a human perspective, again serving as an illustration of God's mysterious design that doesn't always conform to human ideals of efficiency or parental care. It underscores God's ability to create creatures with diverse and sometimes seemingly paradoxical attributes, all within His sovereign plan and for His own purposes.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While Job 39:16 primarily serves to humble Job by showcasing God's incomprehensible wisdom in creation, it also subtly points forward to the ultimate demonstration of divine wisdom and perfect love in Christ. The ostrich's "hardened" nature and "labour in vain" stand in stark contrast to the perfect, self-sacrificial love of God revealed in Jesus. Christ, the very wisdom of God personified (1 Corinthians 1:24), did not harden Himself against His "young ones"—humanity—but rather, out of immense love, "hardened" His resolve to endure the cross for our salvation (Hebrews 12:2). His "labour" on the cross was emphatically not in vain; it was the ultimate act of protective "fear" or diligent care, securing eternal life and reconciliation for all who believe (John 3:16). Unlike the ostrich, Jesus is the Good Shepherd who lays down His life for the sheep, demonstrating perfect, vigilant, and unfailing love, ensuring that His "labour" results in the flourishing and eternal security of His children, ultimately fulfilling God's wise and redemptive plan for humanity and bringing many "sons to glory" (Hebrews 2:10).

Copy as

Commentary on Job 39 verses 13–18

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

The ostrich is a wonderful animal, a very large bird, but it never flies. Some have called it a winged camel. God here gives an account of it, and observes,

I. Something that it has in common with the peacock, that is, beautiful feathers (Job 39:13): Gavest thou proud wings unto the peacocks? so some read it. Fine feathers make proud birds. The peacock is an emblem of pride; when he struts, and shows his fine feathers, Solomon in all his glory is not arrayed like him. The ostrich too has goodly feathers, and yet is a foolish bird; for wisdom does not always go along with beauty and gaiety. Other birds do not envy the peacock or the ostrich their gaudy colours, nor complain for want of them; why then should we repine if we see others wear better clothes than we can afford to wear? God gives his gifts variously, and those gifts are not always the most valuable that make the finest show. Who would not rather have the voice of the nightingale than the tail of the peacock, the eye of the eagle and her soaring wing, and the natural affection of the stork, than the beautiful wings and feathers of the ostrich, which can never rise above the earth, and is without natural affection?

II. Something that is peculiar to itself,

1.Carelessness of her young. It is well that this is peculiar to herself, for it is a very bad character. Observe, (1.) How she exposes her eggs; she does not retire to some private place, and make a nest there, as the sparrows and swallows do (Psa 84:3), and there lay eggs and hatch her young. Most birds, as well as other animals, are strangely guided by natural instinct in providing for the preservation of their young. But the ostrich is a monster in nature, for she drops her eggs any where upon the ground and takes no care to hatch them. If the sand and the sun will hatch them, well and good; they may for her, for she will not warm them, Job 39:14. Nay, she takes no care to preserve them: The foot of the traveller may crush them, and the wild beast break them, Job 39:15. But how then are any young ones brought forth, and whence is it that the species has not perished? We must suppose either that God, by a special providence, with the heat of the sun and the sand (so some think), hatches the neglected eggs of the ostrich, as he feeds the neglected young ones of the raven, or that, though the ostrich often leaves her eggs thus, yet not always. (2.) The reason why she does thus expose her eggs. It is, [1.] For want of natural affection (Job 39:16): She is hardened against her young ones. To be hardened against any is unamiable, even in a brute-creature, much more in a rational creature that boasts of humanity, especially to be hardened against young ones, that cannot help themselves and therefore merit compassion, that give no provocation and therefore merit no hard usage: but it is worst of all for her to be hardened against her own young ones, as though they were not hers, whereas really they are parts of herself. Her labour in laying her eggs is in vain and all lost, because she has not that fear and tender concern for them that she should have. Those are most likely to lose their labour that are least in fear of losing it. [2.] For want of wisdom (Job 39:17): God has deprived her of wisdom. This intimates that the art which other animals have to nourish and preserve their young is God's gift, and that, where it exists not, God denies it, that by the folly of the ostrich, as well as by the wisdom of the ant, we may learn to be wise; for, First, As careless as the ostrich is of her eggs so careless many people are of their own souls; they make no provision for them, no proper nest in which they may be safe, leave them exposed to Satan and his temptations, which is a certain evidence that they are deprived of wisdom. Secondly, So careless are many parents of their children; some of their bodies, not providing for their own house, their own bowels, and therefore worse than infidels, and as bad as the ostrich; but many more are thus careless of their children's souls, take no care of their education, send them abroad into the world untaught, unarmed, forgetting what corruption there is in the world through lust, which will certainly crush them. Thus their labour in rearing them comes to be in vain; it were better for their country that they had never been born. Thirdly, So careless are too many ministers of their people, with whom they should reside; but they leave them in the earth, and forget how busy Satan is to sow tares while men sleep. They overlook those whom they should oversee, and are really hardened against them.

2.Care of herself. She leaves her eggs in danger, but, if she herself be in danger, no creature shall strive more to get out of the way of it than the ostrich, Job 39:18. Then she lifts up her wings on high (the strength of which then stands her in better stead than their beauty), and, with the help of them, runs so fast that a horseman at full speed cannot overtake her: She scorneth the horse and his rider. Those that are least under the law of natural affection often contend most for the law of self-preservation. Let not the rider be proud of the swiftness of his horse when such an animal as the ostrich shall out-run him.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 13–18. Public domain.
Copy as
Ephrem the SyrianAD 373
COMMENTARY ON JOB 39:13
The sort of wings described here appears to signify the synagogue of those who led Christ to the cross. Indeed, who is that mother who generated many children but whose children are not hers? It can only be the one who gave birth to the prophets and brought up the apostles, who are not hers though. Indeed both prophets and apostles, after being adopted into the church, abandoned it.
Gregory the DialogistAD 604
MORALS ON THE BOOK OF JOB 31.17-26
For he whom the grace of charity does not fall upon looks upon his neighbor as a stranger, even though he has himself begotten him to God. Doubtless all are hypocrites whose minds in truth, while ever aiming at outward objects, become insensible within. While they are ever seeking their own, in everything they do they are not softened by any compassion of charity for the feelings of the neighbor.… But hypocrites do not know these gut level feelings of charity. Because the more their mind is let loose on outward subjects by worldly concupiscence, the more it is hardened inside by its lack of affection. And it is frozen by a benumbing torpor within, because it is softened by fatal love outside. It is unable to reflect upon itself, because it does not strive to think of itself. A mind cannot think on itself which is not entirely at home in itself. It is unable to be entirely at home in itself, because by as many lusts as it is hurried away, by as many objects as it is distracted from itself and scattered, it lies below, though with collected strength it may rise, if it willed, to the greatest heights.…“God has deprived it of its wisdom, nor has he given it understanding.” Although to deprive is one thing and “not to give” is another, yet his first expression, “deprived,” he repeated by subjoining “has not given.” As if he were saying, My expression “deprived” means not that he has unjustly taken away wisdom but that he has justly not given it. Hence the Lord is described as having hardened the heart of Pharaoh, not because he himself inflicted hardness or, in accord with the demands of his deserts, because he softened it by a sensibility of heavenly infused fear. But now, because the hypocrite pretends that he is holy and conceals himself under the semblance of good works, he keeps down peace of the holy church and is therefore, before our eyes, arrayed with the appearance of religion. But if any temptation of his faith springs up, the rabid mind of the wolf strips itself of its garb of sheep’s skin and shows by persecution how greatly it rages against the holy.
Gregory the DialogistAD 604
21. For, There they trembled with fear, where no fear was. [Ps. 14, 5] For behold it is commanded by the voice of God; If any one hath taken thy coat, and wished to contend with thee in judgment, give up to him thy cloak also. [Matt. 5, 40] And again; If one hath taken away that which is thine own, ask it not again. [Luke 6, 30] The Apostle Paul also, when he was wishing his disciples to despise outward things, in order to be able to retain those that are within, admonishes them, saying; Now there is utterly a fault in you, because ye have trials among yourselves. Why do ye not rather take wrong, why do ye not rather suffer fraud? [1 Cor. 6, 7] And yet a hypocrite, having assumed the garb of holy conversation, abandons the charge of his children, and seeks to defend, even by wrangling, all his temporal goods. He is not afraid to ruin their hearts by his example, and is afraid of losing his earthly patrimony as if by negligence. His disciple falls into error, and yet the heart of the hypocrite is wounded with no sorrow. He beholds those committed to him plunging into the gulph of iniquity, and passes by these things, as though he had not heard them. But if he has felt any temporal loss slightly inflicted on him, how does he suddenly burst forth, from his inmost soul, into the anger of revenge. His patience is soon broken down; the grief of his heart is soon let loose in words. For while he hears with equanimity the loss of souls, but hastens, even with agitation of spirit, to repel the loss of temporal goods, he truly indicates to all, by this evidence of his emotion of mind, what he loves. For great earnestness of defence is there exercised, where the power of love is also mightier. For the more he loves earthly things, the more vehemently is he afraid of being deprived of them. For we learn not with what feeling we possess any thing in this world, except when we lose it. For, whatever is possessed without love, is lost without pain. But those things, which we ardently love, when possessed, we sigh for heavily when taken away. But who can know not that the Lord created earthly things for our use, but the souls of men for His own? A person is, therefore, convicted of loving himself more than God, who protects those things which are peculiarly his own, to the neglect of what are His. For hypocrites fear not to lose those things which belong to God, that is, the souls of men, and, as if about to render an account to a strict Judge, are afraid of losing those which are their own, things namely which are passing away together with the world. As if they would find Him favourably disposed, for Whom they preserve senseless and undesirable objects, having lost those which are desirable, that is, which are rational. We wish to possess something in this world, and behold the Truth exclaims, Unless a man hath renounced all that he hath, he cannot be My disciple. [Luke 14, 33]
22. How then ought a perfect Christian to defend by disputing those earthly goods, which he is not ordered to possess? When we lose therefore our own possessions, we are lightened of a great burden in this journey of life, if we perfectly follow God. But when the necessity of this same journey imposes on us the care of possessions, some persons are only to he submitted to, while they seize them from us, but others are to he prevented, without violation of charity, not however merely from anxiety lest they should take away from us our goods, but lest they should ruin themselves by seizing what are not their own. For we ought more to fear for the plunderers themselves, than to be eager in defending irrational possessions. For these we lose, at our death, even though not stolen from us; but we are one with the others, both now in the rank of creation, and, if they strive to amend, after their reception of the gift. But who can he ignorant that we ought to love the goods, which we use, less, and that, which we are ourselves, more. If therefore we speak to plunderers, even for their own benefit, we now no longer merely claim for ourselves those things which are temporal, but, for them also, those that are eternal.
23. But we must in this matter carefully watch, that covetousness steal not on us, through fear of necessity; and that a prohibition, kindled by zeal, when strained by immoderate force, may not break out into the disgracefulness of hateful contention. And whilst peace with our neighbour is torn from our hearts, for the sake of an earthly good, it appears plainly, that our property is loved better than our neighbour. For if we have no bowels of charity even towards our neighbour who plundered us, we persecute ourselves worse, than the spoiler does himself, and ravage ourselves more fatally, than the other could do; because by abandoning, of our own accord, the blessing of love, we lose for ourselves that which is within, though we lost, through him, those only which are without. But a hypocrite knows not this form of charity; for, preferring earthly to heavenly possessions, he inflames himself with furious hatred, in his inmost heart, against him who spoils his temporal possessions.
24. But it ought to be known, that there are some, whom mother Church tolerates, nursing them in the bosom of charity, and whom she would carry on even to the advanced growth of spiritual age, who sometimes both wear the garb of sanctity, and yet cannot attain to the merit of perfection. For they rise not to spiritual gifts, and therefore they assist those who are connected with them, in the preservation of earthly goods, and sometimes transgress in anger in this defence. But we must not believe that these persons fall into the numbers of hypocrites, for it is one thing to sin from infirmity, and another from wickedness. There is therefore this difference between these persons and hypocrites, that these, conscious of their own infirmity, prefer being reproved by all for their faults, to being praised for pretended sanctity. But those are both sure that they are doing wrong, and yet in the judgments of men are puffed up with the name of sanctity. These fear not to displease wicked men, even by a virtuous action, provided only they are approved by the judgments of heaven; but those never consider what they are doing, but how by every action they can please men. These, according to the measure of their understanding, contend for the causes of God, even in things of the world; but those subserve the design of the world, even in the causes of God; because in the very midst of the holy deeds they make a show of doing, they seek not the conversion of men, but the breath of applause.
25. When therefore we behold any persons of no mean conversation defending worldly interests passionately or immoderately, we ought to reprove this fault of theirs charitably, and yet not to despair of them, while reproving them. Because there frequently exist in one and the same person certain censurable points which are apparent, and great qualities which lie concealed. But in ourselves our great qualities often come forth openly, and those which are reprehensible are sometimes concealed. Hence, therefore, our pride of mind must be brought low, because, both their weaknesses are public, and ours are secret: and again, their strong points are concealed, and ours are divulged and made public. Those therefore, whom we blame for their open weakness, it remains for us to venerate from our opinion of their hidden strength, and if our own mind is elated at their open weakness, let it keep itself down in humility, from considering its own secret infirmities. For some persons frequently obey many precepts, and pass over a few; and we pass over many, when we keep but a few. Whence it is frequently the case that, when we see others neglect a command, which we know we observe ourselves, our mind immediately exalts itself with pride, forgetting how many commands it passes over, when there are very few which it observes. It is therefore necessary for us in cases where we reprove others, to bring down the pride of our anxious thought. For if our mind sees that it is more exalted than others, being led, as it were, to headlong heights of singularity, it falls the more fatally. But why the hypocrite abandons heavenly lucre, and labours for that of earth, He still subjoins, under the description of the ostrich.
Gregory the DialogistAD 604
MORALS ON THE BOOK OF JOB 31.28
In every step of the fall, the beginning is represented by the lighter faults that later, with the increase of guilt, become more and more serious. Here the evilness of this hypocrite is analyzed through his progressive iniquities. First, he presents himself as a righteous person, which he is not at all. Then, he scorns the righteous. Finally, he even insults the Creator. Indeed, the soul never stays in the place where it fell, because, after falling voluntarily, the weight of its evilness leads it to worse and worse actions. And so, by precipitating [the fall], it is submerged more and more deeply. Let the hypocrite then go now and seek for his own praises. Later he will oppress the life of his neighbor, and one day he will even scorn his own Creator. The more he devises arrogant attitudes, the more he sinks into atrocious punishments as a result.
Gregory the DialogistAD 604
39. It despises, as though they were not its own, those whom it discovers to be living otherwise than it has itself taught, and, as its cruelty becomes obdurate, it applies terrors, and exercises itself in torturing them, and, inflamed by the firebrands of envy, it labours that they should perish, for whom it laboured not that they should live. And, when it persecutes the members of the Lord, it suspects that by this it is pleasing God. Whence also the Truth says to the same eggs of the ostrich, The hour cometh, that whosoever killeth you, thinketh that he doeth God service. [John 16, 2] Because, therefore, when the synagogue is led by cruelty to persecution, it thinks that it is acting thus by the impulse of divine fear, it is rightly subjoined;
She hath laboured in vain, no fear compelling her.
40. For not fear, but cruelty, has compelled it to pant in the labour of persecution. But because vices, when tinged with the colour of virtues, are commonly the more abominable, the less they are known even to be vices; the synagogue was more harsh in persecution, as it believed that it was becoming more religious by the deaths of the faithful. And therefore it could not at all discern what it was doing, because it shut out from itself the light of understanding, by putting pride in the way.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Job 39:16 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.