Then was kindled the wrath of Elihu the son of Barachel the Buzite, of the kindred of Ram: against Job was his wrath kindled, because he justified himself rather than God.
Then was kindled {H2734} the wrath {H639} of Elihu {H453} the son {H1121} of Barachel {H1292} the Buzite {H940}, of the kindred {H4940} of Ram {H7410}: against Job {H347} was his wrath {H639} kindled {H2734}, because he justified {H6663} himself {H5315} rather than God {H430}.
But then the anger of Elihu the son of Barakh'el the Buzi, from the family of Ram, blazed up against Iyov for thinking he was right and God wrong.
This kindled the anger of Elihu son of Barachel the Buzite, of the family of Ram. He burned with anger against Job for justifying himself rather than God,
Then was kindled the wrath of Elihu the son of Barachel the Buzite, of the family of Ram: against Job was his wrath kindled, because he justified himself rather than God.
-
Genesis 22:21
Huz his firstborn, and Buz his brother, and Kemuel the father of Aram, -
Job 27:5
God forbid that I should justify you: till I die I will not remove mine integrity from me. -
Job 35:2
Thinkest thou this to be right, [that] thou saidst, My righteousness [is] more than God's? -
Job 40:8
Wilt thou also disannul my judgment? wilt thou condemn me, that thou mayest be righteous? -
Job 34:5
For Job hath said, I am righteous: and God hath taken away my judgment. -
Job 34:6
Should I lie against my right? my wound [is] incurable without transgression. -
Job 30:21
Thou art become cruel to me: with thy strong hand thou opposest thyself against me.
Job 32:2 marks a significant turning point in the Book of Job, introducing a new character, Elihu, whose perspective differs from the preceding three friends.
Context
After a prolonged debate where Job’s three friends—Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar—have exhausted their arguments, and Job has consistently maintained his innocence and questioned God's justice, a younger man named Elihu steps forward. This verse sets the stage for Elihu's discourse, which spans chapters 32-37. The previous speakers, older than Elihu, had failed to provide satisfactory answers for Job’s suffering, largely adhering to the traditional retribution theology that suffering is a direct result of sin. Elihu’s entrance signifies a fresh, and arguably more nuanced, theological perspective, introducing new arguments about the purpose of suffering and God's interaction with humanity.
Key Themes and Messages
Linguistic Insights
The Hebrew word for "wrath" here is ḥārāh (חָרָה), which conveys a sense of burning anger or indignation. In this context, it suggests a righteous anger stemming from Elihu's perception of theological error. The phrase "justified himself" translates from tsaddēq nap̄šô (צַדֵּק נַפְשׁוֹ), meaning to declare oneself righteous or to make oneself innocent. The critical nuance is "rather than God" (mēʾĕlōhîm), which can be understood as "more than God" or "instead of God," emphasizing that Job's self-vindication was perceived as taking precedence over God's honor or justice.
Practical Application
Job 32:2 serves as a reminder of the human tendency towards self-justification, especially when facing hardship or accusation. While it's natural to defend oneself, this verse cautions against allowing our defense to overshadow or implicitly challenge God's character and perfect justice. It encourages humility and a recognition that God's ways and thoughts are often higher than our own (Isaiah 55:8-9). Elihu's entry also highlights the importance of seeking counsel that prioritizes God's glory and truth, even if it comes from unexpected sources, reminding us that wisdom can emerge from various individuals, regardless of their age or status.