Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
When the king of Babylon's army fought against Jerusalem, and against all the cities of Judah that were left, against Lachish, and against Azekah: for these defenced cities remained of the cities of Judah.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
When the king H4428 of Babylon's H894 army H2428 fought H3898 against Jerusalem H3389, and against all the cities H5892 of Judah H3063 that were left H3498, against Lachish H3923, and against Azekah H5825: for these defenced H4013 cities H5892 remained H7604 of the cities H5892 of Judah H3063.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
at the time when the king of Bavel's army was fighting against Yerushalayim and against all the cities of Y'hudah that were left - that is, against Lakhish and 'Azekah, since only these remained of the fortified cities of Y'hudah.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
as the army of the king of Babylon was fighting against Jerusalem and the remaining cities of Judah—against Lachish and Azekah. For these were the only fortified cities remaining in Judah.
Ask
American Standard Version
when the king of Babylon’s army was fighting against Jerusalem, and against all the cities of Judah that were left, against Lachish and against Azekah; for these alone remained of the cities of Judah as fortified cities.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
when the king of Babylon’s army was fighting against Jerusalem, and against all the cities of Judah that were left, against Lachish and against Azekah; for these alone remained of the cities of Judah as fortified cities.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
(When the King of Babels hoste fought against Ierusalem, and against all the cities of Iudah, that were left, euen against Lachish, and against Azekah: for these strong cities remained of the cities of Iudah)
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and the forces of the king of Babylon are fighting against Jerusalem, and against all the cities of Judah that are left--against Lachish, and against Azekah, for these have been left among the cities of Judah, cities of fortresses.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Jeremiah 34:7 offers a poignant and stark snapshot of the Kingdom of Judah's final, desperate moments, with Nebuchadnezzar's formidable Babylonian army laying siege to Jerusalem and the last remaining fortified cities. This verse specifically identifies Lachish and Azekah as the sole surviving strongholds outside the capital, underscoring the near-total conquest of Judah and the culmination of God's long-prophesied judgment against His unfaithful people. It powerfully illustrates the futility of human resistance against divinely ordained decree and the imminent, irreversible collapse of Judah's sovereignty, setting the stage for the fall of Jerusalem and the subsequent exile.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Jeremiah 34 is strategically placed within a larger prophetic corpus detailing Judah's impending demise and the Babylonian exile. The chapter immediately precedes the account of Jerusalem's final siege and destruction, serving as a critical bridge. Specifically, verses 1-5 set the scene with Nebuchadnezzar's siege of Jerusalem and a personal prophecy concerning King Zedekiah's fate, emphasizing the inevitability of the city's fall. Jeremiah 34:7 then zooms out, providing a wider military context by naming Lachish and Azekah as the only other cities still resisting. This detail highlights the isolation of Jerusalem and the overwhelming success of the Babylonian campaign, reinforcing Jeremiah's consistent message of judgment. The chapter also details Zedekiah's broken covenant regarding the release of Hebrew slaves (Jeremiah 34:8-11), an act of profound disobedience that further sealed Judah's fate and underscored the moral decay that necessitated such severe divine discipline.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The events of Jeremiah 34:7 unfold during the critical period of 588-586 BC, marking the final siege of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar II's Babylonian forces. This era represented the twilight of the Kingdom of Judah, with Zedekiah, a vassal king, having foolishly rebelled against Babylon. Culturally, Judah was a nation whose identity and destiny were inextricably linked to its covenant relationship with Yahweh. Faithfulness was promised blessings, while disobedience, as outlined in passages like Deuteronomy 28:49-52, guaranteed curses, including foreign invasion and siege. Lachish and Azekah were strategically vital, heavily fortified cities situated in the Shephelah (foothills) region, serving as crucial defensive bulwarks protecting the western approaches to Jerusalem. Archaeological discoveries, most notably the Lachish Letters (ostraca found at Lachish), provide powerful extra-biblical corroboration, with one letter (Lachish Letter IV) explicitly mentioning the cessation of visual signal fires from Azekah, indicating its fall. This historical backdrop paints a grim picture of a nation cornered, its last defenses crumbling under the weight of a divinely orchestrated judgment enacted through a powerful empire.
  • Key Themes: Jeremiah 34:7 profoundly contributes to several overarching themes pervasive in the book of Jeremiah and the broader prophetic literature. Firstly, it vividly illustrates the theme of Imminent Judgment and the Consequences of Persistent Disobedience. The dwindling number of resisting cities serves as a tangible, visual sign that God's patience has reached its limit, and His promised judgment for Judah's deep-seated idolatry and covenant unfaithfulness is now irrevocably at hand (compare with Jeremiah 25:8-11). Secondly, the verse powerfully underscores the Fulfillment of Prophecy. Jeremiah's often-ridiculed and dismissed warnings about Babylon acting as God's instrument of wrath are now demonstrably coming to pass, validating his prophetic office and affirming the absolute certainty of God's spoken word (see also Jeremiah 28:8-9). Finally, and perhaps most profoundly, the verse implicitly but firmly asserts God's Sovereignty over all nations and the course of human history. Despite the immense military might of Babylon, it is ultimately Yahweh who orchestrates these events, using a pagan empire to execute His righteous purposes and discipline His errant people, demonstrating that no human stronghold, military prowess, or political maneuver can thwart His ultimate and sovereign will (as seen in Jeremiah 27:5-8).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • army (Hebrew, chayil', H2428): From חוּל, this term denotes a force, whether of men, means, or other resources, often referring to a military host or band of soldiers. In Jeremiah 34:7, "the king of Babylon's army" emphasizes the formidable, overwhelming, and destructive military might of Nebuchadnezzar's forces. It highlights their immense power and the utter futility of Judah's resistance against such a potent instrument of divine judgment, signifying a force capable of total conquest.
  • fought (Hebrew, lâcham', H3898): A primitive root, this word primarily means "to feed on" or "to consume," and figuratively, "to battle" or "to make war." The implication is one of aggressive, destructive engagement, where the act of fighting is akin to devouring or utterly consuming the enemy. Here, it vividly portrays the relentless, consuming nature of the Babylonian siege, not merely as a minor skirmish but as a total war aimed at the complete subjugation and destruction of Judah's remaining defenses.
  • defenced (Hebrew, mibtsâr', H4013): Also (in plural) feminine (Daniel 11:l5) מִבְצָרָה; from בָּצַר, this term refers to a fortification, a castle, or a fortified city, and figuratively, a defender or stronghold. The use of "defenced cities" for Lachish and Azekah underscores their strategic importance and the strength of their fortifications. It highlights that these were not easily conquered towns but well-prepared strongholds, making their imminent fall even more indicative of the overwhelming power of the Babylonian army and the tragic inevitability of Judah's defeat.

Verse Breakdown

  • "When the king of Babylon's army fought against Jerusalem,": This initial clause immediately establishes the primary aggressor, Nebuchadnezzar's formidable military, and its ultimate target, Jerusalem, the capital and spiritual heart of Judah. It sets the scene of the grand siege, which was the culmination of years of warnings and smaller incursions, signifying the final, decisive confrontation.
  • "and against all the cities of Judah that were left,": This phrase emphasizes the widespread destruction and conquest that had already occurred throughout the territory of Judah. It indicates that the vast majority of Judahite cities had already fallen to the Babylonians, leaving only a desperate and isolated few still resisting. This highlights the dire and precarious position of Jerusalem and the remaining strongholds.
  • "against Lachish, and against Azekah:": These specific cities are named because they were the last significant fortified outposts outside Jerusalem still holding out against the Babylonian onslaught. Their explicit mention underscores their strategic importance as the final line of defense for the capital, and their inclusion signifies the near-total collapse of Judah's kingdom, with only these two strongholds left to fall.
  • "for these defenced cities remained of the cities of Judah.": This concluding clause confirms the status of Lachish and Azekah as the final strongholds of Judah. The term "defenced" (fortified) accentuates their military strength and strategic significance, making their continued resistance, however brief, particularly notable. Yet, the very fact that only these remained speaks volumes about the overwhelming extent of Babylon's conquest and the impending, inevitable doom for Judah.

Literary Devices

Jeremiah 34:7 masterfully employs several literary devices to convey its profound message of impending doom and divine judgment. Foreshadowing is prominently featured, as the enumeration of only two remaining "defenced cities" alongside Jerusalem grimly hints at the imminent and complete fall of the capital itself. This dwindling resistance serves as a powerful Symbolism of Judah's final, desperate stand, representing the last vestiges of a once-proud and sovereign kingdom before its total collapse and exile. The verse also subtly utilizes Understatement through its concise enumeration; by simply stating what "remained," it implicitly conveys the vast and overwhelming extent of what had already been lost, allowing the reader to grasp the scope of the Babylonian conquest without an explicit, exhaustive description of every fallen city. Furthermore, there's a poignant element of Irony in the description of these cities as "defenced" or fortified, for despite their inherent strength and strategic importance, they are ultimately unable to withstand the divinely ordained judgment, illustrating the profound futility of human might and defenses when set against God's sovereign purposes.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Jeremiah 34:7 functions as a stark theological commentary on the dire consequences of covenant unfaithfulness and the absolute certainty of God's word. It powerfully demonstrates that divine judgment, though often delayed in God's patience, is an inevitable and unavoidable reality when a people persistently rebels against His commands and disregards His warnings. The fall of these last strongholds underscores the profound truth that no human defense, strategic advantage, or military might can ultimately thwart the sovereign will of God, who uses even pagan empires as instruments of His righteous discipline. This historical moment serves as a powerful and enduring reminder that God holds nations accountable for their actions and that His prophecies are not idle threats but sure declarations that will unfailingly come to pass. While this verse highlights the physical remnants of Judah's kingdom, it implicitly points to the broader theological concept of a "remnant" that God would preserve through the exile, albeit a spiritual one, ensuring the continuity of His redemptive plan.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Jeremiah 34:7 stands as a solemn and enduring monument to the unwavering truth of God's word and the severe consequences that inevitably follow persistent disobedience. For us today, it serves as a profound and urgent call to heed divine warnings, whether they are communicated through the explicit declarations of Scripture, the quiet conviction of our consciences, or the loving counsel of faithful believers. Just as Judah's formidable fortified cities could not ultimately withstand God's decreed judgment, so too are our own self-reliant "strongholds"—be they our accumulated wealth, perceived power, intellectual prowess, or even our subtle self-righteousness—ultimately powerless and futile against the righteous hand of God. This verse compels us to humbly examine our lives for any areas of unfaithfulness, idolatry, or misplaced trust, and to embrace genuine, heartfelt repentance. It reminds us that true security, lasting peace, and ultimate flourishing lie not in human defenses or worldly provisions, but solely in humble obedience to God's commands and unwavering trust in His absolute sovereignty over all circumstances. God's plans, though sometimes involving painful discipline, are always just, always purposeful, and ultimately aim for our deepest good and His supreme glory.

Questions for Reflection

  • What "fortified cities" or areas of self-reliance do I tend to trust in more than God's unfailing word and provision?
  • How seriously do I personally take God's warnings and calls to repentance as revealed in Scripture and through the Holy Spirit's conviction?
  • In what specific ways can I better align my daily life, decisions, and priorities with God's revealed will, recognizing His ultimate and benevolent sovereignty over all circumstances?

FAQ

Why are Lachish and Azekah specifically mentioned alongside Jerusalem?

Answer: Lachish and Azekah were strategically vital, heavily fortified cities located in the Shephelah (foothills) region of Judah. They served as key defensive outposts protecting the approach to Jerusalem from the west. Their specific mention in Jeremiah 34:7 signifies that by this point in the Babylonian siege, nearly all other cities in Judah had already fallen. Their continued, albeit brief, resistance highlighted their strength as "defenced cities" and underscored the dire reality that only these last few strongholds remained before Jerusalem itself would inevitably fall. Archaeological evidence, such as the Lachish Letters, further confirms their importance and their role in the final, desperate days of the kingdom.

What happened to these cities after this verse?

Answer: Shortly after the events described in Jeremiah 34:7, both Lachish and Azekah fell to the overwhelming Babylonian army. Archaeological excavations at both sites have revealed extensive destruction layers consistent with the Babylonian conquest, demonstrating the ferocity and totality of the siege. The Lachish Letters, a collection of ancient ostraca discovered at Lachish, include one poignant letter (Lachish Letter IV) that mentions the signal fires from Azekah no longer being visible, strongly suggesting its fall. The swift fall of these last remaining fortified cities left Jerusalem completely isolated and vulnerable, leading directly to its eventual capture, destruction, and the subsequent exile of its inhabitants in 586 BC, as meticulously detailed in Jeremiah 39:1-10.

How does this verse relate to Jeremiah's overall message of judgment and hope?

Answer: Jeremiah 34:7 is a powerful and somber illustration of the fulfillment of Jeremiah's long-standing prophecies of judgment against Judah for its persistent idolatry, covenant unfaithfulness, and moral corruption. It represents the culmination of God's discipline, demonstrating the absolute certainty of His word and the utter futility of human resistance against His sovereign will. While this verse focuses intensely on the immediate, devastating judgment, it is crucial to understand it within Jeremiah's broader prophetic message. Even amidst the severity of judgment, Jeremiah also proclaims a message of future hope, divine preservation of a remnant, and the promise of a new covenant (Jeremiah 31:31-34). Thus, this verse highlights the profound severity of sin and its consequences but also implicitly points to the necessity of divine intervention and grace for true hope beyond human failure and the cycle of judgment.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Jeremiah 34:7, depicting Judah's final, desperate stand against an overwhelming enemy and the inevitable collapse of its human defenses, finds profound Christ-centered fulfillment in several interconnected ways. The vulnerability of Jerusalem and its last strongholds under divine judgment powerfully foreshadows the ultimate judgment for sin, which Christ, in His boundless love, willingly bore on the cross. Just as no human "defenced cities" could withstand God's righteous decree against a rebellious Judah, so too no human effort, self-righteousness, or worldly strength can withstand the righteous judgment against sin. We are all, in our fallen state, spiritually like those besieged cities, utterly without true defense or hope against the just consequences of our rebellion against a holy God. However, in Christ, we find the ultimate, impregnable "stronghold" and "defender." He is the true Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, offering Himself as the perfect, once-for-all sacrifice to satisfy divine justice and reconcile humanity to God. His lament over Jerusalem in Matthew 23:37-38 echoes the sorrow of judgment, yet His ultimate act of redemption provides the only true escape from the condemnation that Judah faced. Furthermore, while Judah's physical strongholds crumbled into dust, Christ is presented in the New Testament as the living cornerstone, the immovable and eternal foundation upon which God is building a spiritual house, a new people who will never be put to shame (1 Peter 2:4-6). He is the true King, establishing an eternal kingdom that will never be overthrown or destroyed, unlike the earthly kingdom of Judah (Daniel 2:44). Thus, the despair and finality of Jeremiah 34:7 ultimately point beyond human failure to the glorious hope found in Christ, our only true refuge, our ultimate defense, and the perfect fulfillment of God's saving purposes for all eternity.

Copy as

Commentary on Jeremiah 34 verses 1–7

This prophecy concerning Zedekiah was delivered to Jeremiah, and by him to the parties concerned, before he was shut up in the prison, for we find this prediction here made the ground of his commitment, as appears by the recital of some passages out of it, Jer 32:4. Observe,

I. The time when this message was sent to Zedekiah; it was when the king of Babylon, with all his forces, some out of all the kingdoms of the earth that were within his jurisdiction, fought against Jerusalem and the cities thereof (Jer 34:1), designing to destroy them, having often plundered them. The cities that now remained, and yet held out, are named (Jer 34:7), Lachish and Azekah. This intimates that things were now brought to the last extremity, and yet Zedekiah obstinately stood it out, his heart being hardened to his destruction.

II. The message itself that was sent to him. 1. Here is a threatening of wrath. He is told that again which he had been often told before, that the city shall be taken by the Chaldeans and burnt with fire (Jer 34:2), that he shall himself fall into the enemy's hands, shall be made a prisoner, shall be brought before that furious prince Nebuchadnezzar, and be carried away captive into Babylon (Jer 34:3); yet Ezekiel prophesied that he should not see Babylon; nor did he, for his eyes were put out, Eze 12:13. This Zedekiah brought upon himself from God by his other sins and from Nebuchadnezzar by breaking his faith with him. 2. Here is a mixture of mercy. He shall die a captive, but he shall not die by the sword he shall die a natural death (Jer 34:4); he shall end his days with some comfort, shall die in peace, Jer 34:5. He never had been one of the worst of the kings, but we are willing to hope that what evil he had done in the sight of the Lord he repented of in his captivity, as Manasseh had done, and it was forgiven to him; and, God being reconciled to him, he might truly be said to die in peace, Note, A man may die in a prison and yet die in peace. Nay, he shall end his days with some reputation, more than one would expect, all things considered. He shall be buried with the burnings of his fathers, that is, with the respect usually shown to their kings, especially those that had done good in Israel. It seems, in his captivity he had conducted himself so well towards his own people that they were willing to do him this honour, and towards Nebuchadnezzar that he suffered it to be done. If Zedekiah had continued in his prosperity, perhaps he would have grown worse and would have departed at last without being desired; but his afflictions wrought such a change in him that his death was looked upon as a great loss. It is better to live and die penitent in a prison than to live and die impenitent in a palace. They will lament thee, saying, Ah lord! an honour which his brother Jehoiakim had not, Jer 22:18. The Jews say that they lamented thus over him, Alas! Zedekiah is dead, who drank the dregs of all the ages that went before him, that is, who suffered for the sins of his ancestors, the measure of iniquity being filled up in his days. They shall thus lament him, saith the Lord, for I have pronounced the word; and what God hath spoken shall without fail be made good.

III. Jeremiah's faithfulness in delivering this message. Though he knew it would be ungrateful to the king, and might prove, as indeed it did, dangerous to himself (for he was imprisoned for it), yet he spoke all these words to Zedekiah, Jer 34:6. It is a mercy to great men to have those about them that will deal faithfully with them, and tell them the evil consequences of their evil courses, that they may reform and live.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–7. Public domain.
Copy as
JeromeAD 420
St. Jerome, Commentary on Daniel, CHAPTER SEVEN
[Daniel 7:1] "In the first year of Belshazzar, King of Babylon, Daniel beheld a dream. And a vision of his head upon his bed. And when he wrote the dream down, he comprehended it in a few words and gave a brief summary of it, saying..." This section which we now undertake to explain, and also the subsequent section which we are going to discuss, is historically prior to the two previous sections. For this present section and that which follows it are recorded to have taken place in the first and third years of the reign of King Belshazzar (Jeremiah 39) [Jerome's citation of Jeremiah 39 seems quite pointless in this connection]. But the section which we read previously to the one just preceding this, is recorded to have taken place in the last year, indeed on the final day, of Belshaz-zar's reign. And we meet this phenomenon not only in Daniel but also in Jeremiah [cf. Jeremiah 35 and Jeremiah 34] and Ezekiel (Ezekiel 17), as we shall be able to show, if life spares us that long. But in the earlier portion of the book, the historical order has been followed, namely the events which occurred in the time of Nebuchadnezzar, and Belshazzar, and Darius or Cyrus. But in the passages now before us an account is given of various visions which were beheld on particular occasions and of which only the prophet himself was aware, and which therefore lacked any importance as signs or revelations so far as the barbarian nations were concerned. But they were written down only that a record of the things beheld might be preserved for posterity.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Jeremiah 34:7 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.