Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And he said, Art thou my very son Esau? And he said, I am.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And he said H559, Art thou my very son H1121 Esau H6215? And he said H559, I am.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
He asked, "Are you really my son 'Esav?"And he replied, "I am."
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Again he asked, “Are you really my son Esau?” And he replied, “I am.”
Ask
American Standard Version
And he said, Art thou my very son Esau? And he said, I am.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
He said, “Are you really my son Esau?” He said, “I am.”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Againe he sayd, Art thou that my sonne Esau? Who answered, Yea.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and saith, `Thou art he--my son Esau?' and he saith, `I am .'
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Genesis Sites (Canaan)
All Genesis Sites (Canaan) View full PDF
All Genesis Sites (Middle East)
All Genesis Sites (Middle East) View full PDF
Isaac and Rebekah
Isaac and Rebekah View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 752 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Genesis 27:24 captures the climactic moment of Jacob's deception of his blind father, Isaac, to secure the patriarchal blessing intended for Esau. Isaac, deeply suspicious due to conflicting sensory evidence, directly questions Jacob's identity, to which Jacob, disguised and lying, unequivocally affirms he is Esau, thereby sealing the fraudulent transfer of the irreplaceable blessing and setting in motion a chain of profound consequences.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This pivotal verse occurs amidst a meticulously orchestrated deception by Rebekah and Jacob, designed to circumvent Isaac's intention to bestow the solemn patriarchal blessing upon Esau, his firstborn. Isaac, now old and blind, has called Esau to prepare a savory meal before receiving the binding declaration of divine favor and inheritance. However, Rebekah, recalling God's earlier prophecy that "the elder shall serve the younger" (Genesis 25:23), devises a plan for Jacob to impersonate Esau. Jacob, covered in goat skins to mimic Esau's hairy hands and wearing Esau's clothes, approaches his father. Isaac's senses betray him; he notes, "The voice is Jacob's voice, but the hands are the hands of Esau" (Genesis 27:22). Despite this profound suspicion, Isaac's desperate need for confirmation, coupled with the tactile evidence, leads to the direct confrontation in Genesis 27:24, where Jacob's definitive lie seals the deception.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In ancient Near Eastern societies, the patriarchal blessing was a profoundly significant and binding declaration, far more than a mere wish. It was a formal, often public, and generally irrevocable bestowal of spiritual and material inheritance, divine favor, and authority from the patriarch to his chosen heir, typically the firstborn son (primogeniture). This blessing was believed to be a conduit for God's covenant promises, ensuring prosperity, numerous descendants, and a special relationship with God. The act of blessing was a solemn ritual, often accompanied by a meal. The cultural weight of a direct affirmation or an oath was immense; a spoken word, once given, was considered to have performative power and was extremely difficult, if not impossible, to retract. Isaac's reliance on sensory input (touch, smell, taste, voice) in his blindness reflects the practical realities of the time, where such physical cues were paramount in confirming identity and authenticity.
  • Key Themes: Genesis 27:24 contributes significantly to several major themes within the book of Genesis and the broader biblical narrative. The most prominent is Deception and its Consequences, vividly illustrating how human manipulation, even when seemingly successful, leads to profound family strife, fear, and long-term separation, as Jacob's subsequent exile demonstrates. Another crucial theme is the tension between Divine Sovereignty and Human Means. While God had sovereignly declared that "the elder shall serve the younger" (Genesis 25:23), Rebekah and Jacob resorted to sinful means, revealing a lack of trust in God's timing and methods. This narrative underscores that God's purposes will ultimately prevail, but He does not condone or require human sin to achieve them, and such actions always carry repercussions. The Irreversibility and Power of the Patriarchal Blessing is also central, highlighting its immense spiritual and material value, which motivated such extreme measures to secure it. Finally, the Flawed Nature of God's Chosen People is evident, as Isaac is susceptible to deception and Jacob is willing to lie, emphasizing that God works through imperfect individuals, showcasing His grace and faithfulness rather than human merit.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • said (Hebrew, ʼâmar', H559): This primitive root is used with great latitude, meaning "to say, speak, declare, command, answer." In Genesis 27:24, the repeated use of "said" (implied in the KJV's "And he said... And he said...") underscores the direct, verbal exchange that forms the climax of the deception. Isaac's question is a desperate plea for clarity, while Jacob's response is a stark, definitive affirmation. The word choice emphasizes that this is not a casual conversation but a moment of profound gravity where spoken words carry immense weight and consequence, leading to a binding declaration that will shape the future of the patriarchal line.
  • son (Hebrew, bên', H1121): This term signifies a son in the widest sense, encompassing literal and figurative relationships, and often implies one who builds or continues the family name. Isaac's question, "Art thou my very son Esau?" emphasizes the direct lineage and the specific identity of the heir who would receive the blessing. The term highlights the profound importance of familial identity, primogeniture, and the continuation of the covenant line in ancient Israelite culture, making Jacob's impersonation of his brother a direct assault on these foundational principles.
  • Esau (Hebrew, ʻÊsâv', H6215): This name apparently derives from a root meaning "rough" or "hairy," directly relating to Esau's distinctive physical appearance, which was a key element in Jacob's disguise (goat skins). The explicit mention of Esau's name in Isaac's direct question underscores the specific target of the blessing and the profound irony of Jacob's impersonation. Jacob is not merely claiming to be a son, but specifically Esau, attempting to embody the very characteristics and identity that define his brother, thereby highlighting the depth of the deception.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And he said, Art thou my very son Esau?": This clause captures Isaac's final, desperate attempt to reconcile the conflicting sensory information he has received. His hearing tells him it's Jacob's voice, but the touch of the hairy hands (covered in goat skins) and the smell of Esau's garments suggest otherwise. The KJV's bracketed "Art" indicates an implied interrogative, while the Hebrew's use of the emphatic pronoun hu (הוּא) before "my son Esau" intensifies Isaac's plea for an unequivocal affirmation of identity ("Are you he, my son Esau?"). This is not a casual inquiry but a profound challenge, revealing Isaac's deep suspicion and his desire for truth before bestowing the irrevocable patriarchal blessing.
  • "And he said, I am.": Jacob's response is a concise, absolute, and profoundly deceptive lie. The Hebrew ani (אֲנִי), meaning "I," stands alone, a stark and unqualified affirmation. Its brevity underscores the deliberate nature of the deception, leaving no room for ambiguity or hesitation. This single, powerful word, uttered by Jacob, decisively overrides Isaac's lingering doubts, allowing the fraudulent transfer of the blessing to proceed. This moment irrevocably sets in motion a cascade of far-reaching consequences for Jacob, Esau, and their descendants, demonstrating the immense power and destructive potential of a lie.

Literary Devices

The exchange in Genesis 27:24 is rich with literary techniques that amplify its dramatic impact and thematic depth. The primary device is Irony, as Isaac, though physically blind, is initially perceptive enough to note the discrepancy between Jacob's voice and the hands of Esau (Genesis 27:22), yet is ultimately swayed by a direct, simple lie. This creates immense Dramatic Tension, building to the climax of Jacob's bold affirmation. The entire scene is an elaborate act of Deception, meticulously orchestrated by Rebekah and executed by Jacob, highlighting the moral compromise at the heart of the narrative. The direct Dialogue between father and son is stark and impactful, revealing Isaac's vulnerability and Jacob's calculated dishonesty. Furthermore, the scene employs Symbolism through the use of Esau's garments and the goat skins, which are not merely props but potent representations of the identity Jacob is attempting to steal. The narrative also uses Contrast between Isaac's desire for truth and Jacob's embrace of falsehood, setting the stage for future conflicts and the long-term consequences of this pivotal moment.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The pivotal exchange in Genesis 27:24 profoundly illustrates several enduring theological and thematic truths. It starkly portrays the destructive nature of deception and its far-reaching consequences, demonstrating that even when seemingly successful in achieving a desired outcome, sinful means inevitably lead to pain, division, and long-term suffering, as seen in Jacob's subsequent exile and family estrangement. The narrative also grapples with the tension between divine sovereignty and human responsibility, highlighting that while God's ultimate purposes for Jacob were predetermined (Genesis 25:23), human beings are still morally accountable for their choices. God does not condone sin, even when it appears to align with His will, and the narrative serves as a powerful reminder that His plans do not require human manipulation. Furthermore, the scene underscores the immense value and binding nature of the patriarchal blessing in ancient Israelite culture, which was considered an irrevocable spiritual and material inheritance, emphasizing the gravity of Isaac's decision and the profound impact of its bestowal. Finally, the narrative reveals the flawed nature of even foundational biblical patriarchs, showcasing that God works through imperfect individuals, underscoring His grace and faithfulness rather than human merit.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Genesis 27:24 stands as a powerful and enduring narrative for contemporary reflection, urging believers to confront the insidious nature of deception in their own lives. Jacob's choice to lie, despite the divine promise that he would be the one to receive the blessing, reveals a profound lack of trust in God's perfect timing and righteous methods. This narrative serves as a timeless cautionary tale, reminding us that even when we desire a seemingly good outcome, resorting to dishonest means undermines our integrity and ultimately leads to bitter fruit, disrupting relationships and hindering spiritual growth. It compels us to examine our own motivations, asking whether we are truly relying on God's providence or attempting to manipulate circumstances to achieve our own ends. The passage challenges us to cultivate a deep commitment to truthfulness, recognizing that our words and actions have far-reaching consequences, not only for ourselves but for those around us. By embracing integrity and patiently trusting in God's sovereign plan, we align ourselves with His character and open ourselves to His blessings, which are always bestowed in righteousness and truth, far surpassing any gain achieved through deceit.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of my life might I be tempted to use deceptive means to achieve a desired outcome, rather than trusting God's timing and methods?
  • How does Jacob's immediate consequence (forced exile) illustrate the principle that "whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap" (Galatians 6:7)?
  • How can I cultivate a deeper trust in God's sovereignty, even when circumstances seem to require my intervention through less-than-truthful means?

FAQ

Why was Isaac so easily deceived despite his suspicion?

Answer: Isaac's advanced age and severe blindness were primary factors, forcing him to rely heavily on his other senses: touch, smell, and hearing. While he explicitly noted the discrepancy between Jacob's voice and the hairy hands (Genesis 27:22), the elaborate disguise (goat skins mimicking Esau's hairiness, Esau's clothes), the savory meal prepared by Rebekah, and perhaps his own deep-seated desire to believe his son, allowed Jacob's definitive "I am" to override his lingering doubts. The cultural weight of a direct affirmation or an oath in that ancient context also played a significant role, making it difficult for Isaac to disbelieve such a direct response from his son.

Did God approve of Jacob's deception to receive the blessing?

Answer: No, the Bible consistently condemns deception and lying as contrary to God's character and commands (Proverbs 12:22). While God had sovereignly purposed that Jacob, the younger, would receive the blessing over Esau (Genesis 25:23), He did not condone the sinful means by which Jacob and Rebekah sought to achieve it. The subsequent years of hardship, fear, and profound family estrangement that Jacob experienced, including his flight from Esau and his own deception by Laban, demonstrate the negative consequences of their actions. This narrative powerfully illustrates that God's will is ultimately accomplished despite human sin, not because of it, and that sinful actions always carry their own painful repercussions.

What was the significance of the patriarchal blessing in this context?

Answer: In the ancient Near East, and particularly within the patriarchal narratives, the blessing was a solemn, binding, and often irreversible declaration that conveyed spiritual and material inheritance, divine favor, and authority from the patriarch to his chosen heir. It was not merely a wish but a performative utterance believed to be a conduit for God's covenant promises, ensuring prosperity, numerous descendants, a special relationship with God, and leadership within the family and tribe. Its immense spiritual and practical value is precisely why Jacob and Rebekah went to such extraordinary lengths to secure it, and why Isaac was so distraught upon realizing his deception (Genesis 27:33-35).

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The narrative of Jacob's deception in Genesis 27:24 serves as a profound theological foreshadowing and a stark contrast to the ultimate blessing found in Jesus Christ. Jacob, a flawed and fallen man, obtained a temporal, earthly blessing through cunning and outright deceit, highlighting humanity's inherent inability to perfectly fulfill God's will and our fallen nature's propensity towards manipulation. In radical contrast, Jesus Christ is the true and ultimate heir, the perfectly obedient Son of God who genuinely receives and bestows the eternal blessing. Unlike Jacob, who presented a false identity and relied on a physical disguise, Christ is the authentic Son, the very image of the invisible God (Colossians 1:15). Through His perfect life, His atoning death on the cross, and His glorious resurrection, Christ secured the New Covenant blessing for all who believe (Ephesians 1:3). He does not deceive but reveals truth, offering a spiritual inheritance that far surpasses any earthly gain (1 Peter 1:3-5). This blessing is freely given by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8-9), not earned through human contrivance or deceit. Through Christ, believers are truly blessed with adoption into God's family (Galatians 4:4-7), the indwelling of the Holy Spirit (John 14:16-17), and eternal life (John 3:16), fulfilling the Abrahamic covenant in a way that Jacob's earthly blessing could only dimly prefigure.

Copy as

Commentary on Genesis 27 verses 18–29

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Observe here, I. The art and assurance with which Jacob managed this intrigue. Who would have thought that this plain man could have played his part so well in a design of this nature? His mother having put him in the way of it, and encouraged him in it, he dexterously applied himself to those methods which he had never accustomed himself to, but had always conceived an abhorrence of. Note, Lying is soon learnt. The psalmist speaks of those who, as soon as they are born, speak lies, Psa 58:3; Jer 9:5. I wonder how honest Jacob could so readily turn his tongue to say (Gen 27:19), I am Esau thy first-born; nor do I see how the endeavour of some to bring him off with that equivocation, I am made thy first-born, namely by purchase, does him any service; for when his father asked him (Gen 27:24), Art thou my very son Esau? he said, I am. How could he say, I have done as thou badest me, when he had received no command from his father, but was doing as his mother bade him? How could he say, Eat of my venison, when he knew it came, not from the field, but from the fold? But especially I wonder how he could have the assurance to father it upon God, and to use his name in the cheat (Gen 27:20): The Lord thy God brought it to me. Is this Jacob? Is this Israel indeed, without guile? It is certainly written, not for our imitation, but for our admonition. Let him that thinks he stands take heed lest he fall. Good men have sometimes failed in the exercise of those graces for which they have been most eminent.

II. The success of this management. Jacob with some difficulty gained his point, and obtained the blessing.

1.Isaac was at first dissatisfied, and would have discovered the fraud if he could have trusted his own ears; for the voice was Jacob's voice, Gen 27:22. Providence has ordered a strange variety of voices as well as faces, which is also of use to prevent our being imposed upon; and the voice is a thing not easily disguised nor counterfeited. This may be alluded to to illustrate the character of a hypocrite. His voice is Jacob's voice, but his hands are Esau's. He speaks the language of a saint, but does the works of a sinner; but the judgement will be, as here, by the hands.

2.At length he yielded to the power of the cheat, because the hands were hairy (Gen 27:23), not considering how easy it was to counterfeit that circumstance; and now Jacob carries it on dexterously, sets his venison before his father, and waits at table very officiously, till dinner is done, and the blessing comes to be pronounced in the close of this solemn feast. That which in some small degree extenuates the crime of Rebekah and Jacob is that the fraud was intended, not so much to hasten the fulfilling, as to prevent the thwarting, of the oracle of God: the blessing was just going to be put upon the wrong head, and they thought it was time to bestir themselves. Now let us see how Isaac gave Jacob his blessing, Gen 27:26-29. (1.) He embraced him, in token of a particular affection to him. Those that are blessed of God are kissed with the kisses of his mouth, and they do, by love and loyalty, kiss the Son, Psa 2:12. (2.) He praised him. He smelt the smell of his raiment, and said, See, the smell of my son is as the smell of a field which the Lord hath blessed, that is, like that of the most fragrant flowers and spices. It appeared that God had blessed him, and therefore Isaac would bless him. (3.) He prayed for him, and therein prophesied concerning him. It is the duty of parents to pray for their children, and to bless them in the name of the Lord. And thus, as well as by their baptism, to do what they can to preserve and perpetuate the entail of the covenant in their families. But this was an extraordinary blessing; and Providence so ordered it that Isaac should bestow it upon Jacob ignorantly and by mistake, that it might appear he was beholden to God for it, and not to Isaac. Three things Jacob is here blessed with: - [1.] Plenty (Gen 27:28), heaven and earth concurring to make him rich. [2.] Power (Gen 27:29), particularly dominion over his brethren, namely, Esau and his posterity. [3.] Prevalency with God, and a great interest in Heaven: "Cursed by every one that curseth thee and blessed be he that blesseth thee. Let God be a friend to all thy friends, and an enemy to all they enemies." More is certainly comprised in this blessing than appears prima facie - at first sight. It must amount to an entail of the promise of the Messiah, and of the church; this was, in the patriarchal dialect, the blessing: something spiritual, doubtless, is included in it. First, That from him should come the Messiah, who should have a sovereign dominion on earth. It was that top-branch of his family which people should serve and nations bow down to. See Num 24:19, Out of Jacob shall come he that shall have dominion, the star and sceptre, Gen 27:17. Jacob's dominion over Esau was to be only typical of this, Gen 49:10. Secondly, That from him should come the church, which should be particularly owned and favoured by Heaven. It was part of the blessing of Abraham, when he was first called to be the father of the faithful (Gen 12:3), I will bless those that bless thee; therefore, when Isaac afterwards confirmed the blessing to Jacob, he called it the blessing of Abraham, Gen 28:4. Balaam explains this too, Num 24:9. Note, It is the best and most desirable blessing to stand in relation to Christ and his church, and to be interested in Christ's power and the church's favours.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 18–29. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Genesis 27:24 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.