Ezra 6:7
“Darius Confirms the Decree and Provides Funds”Ezra 6:6–12
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- שְׁבֻקוּshe·Vu·kuleave!H7662V-Peal-Imp-2mpVerb Peal Imperative 2nd Plural Masculine
- לַעֲבִידַתla·'a·vi·Dat[obj.] [the] work ofH5673Prep-l ¦ N-fscNoun Singular Feminine Constructלַ[obj.]עֲבִידַת[the] work of
- בֵּיתbeit[the] house ofH1005N-cscNoun Singular common gender Construct
- אֱלָהָא'e·la·Ha'[the] GodH426N-cs ¦ ArtNoun Singular common gender Definiteאֱלָהָ[the]אGod
- דֵךְDekhthisH1791PrtParticle Demonstrative
- פַּחַתpa·Chat[the] governor ofH6347N-fscNoun Singular Feminine Construct
- יְהוּדָיֵאye·hu·da·Ye'Jews theH3062N-mp ¦ ArtNoun Gentilic Plural Masculine DefiniteיְהוּדָיֵJewsאthe
- וּלְשָׂבֵיu·le·sa·Veiand [to] [the] elders ofH7868Conj-w ¦ Prep-l ¦ N-mpcNoun Plural Masculine Constructוּandלְ[to]שָׂבֵי[the] elders of
- יְהוּדָיֵאye·hu·da·Ye'Jews theH3062N-mp ¦ ArtNoun Gentilic Plural Masculine DefiniteיְהוּדָיֵJewsאthe
- בֵּיתbeit[the] house ofH1005N-cscNoun Singular common gender Construct
- אֱלָהָא'e·la·Ha'[the] GodH426N-cs ¦ ArtNoun Singular common gender Definiteאֱלָהָ[the]אGod
- דֵךְdekhthisH1791PrtParticle Demonstrative
- יִבְנוֹןyiv·Nonlet them buildH1124V-Peal-Imperf-3mpVerb Peal Imperfect 3rd Plural Masculine
- עַל'alonH5922PrepPreposition
- אַתְרֵהּ'at·Rehits placeH870N-csc ¦ 3fsNoun Singular common gender Construct with suffixאַתְרֵplaceהּits
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Hebrew, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Hebrew word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Hebrew word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “the LORD” where the gloss reads “Yahweh”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
See on the biblical-era map

Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Ezra 6:1–12. He set out his notes in a four-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
We have here, I. The decree of Cyrus for the building of the temple repeated. To this the Samaritans referred because the Jews pleaded it, and perhaps hoped it would not be found, and then their plea would be over-ruled and a stop put to their work. Search was ordered to be made for it among the records; for, it seems, the tribes had not taken care to provide themselves with an authentic copy of it, which might have stood them in good stead, but they must appeal to the original. It was looked for in Babylon (Ezra 6:1), where Cyrus was when he signed it. But, when it was not found there, Darius did not make that a pretence to conclude that therefore there was no such decree, and thereupon to give judgment against the Jews; but it is probable, having himself heard that such a decree was certainly made, he ordered the rolls in other places to be searched, and at length it was found at Achmetha, in the province of the Medes, Ezra 6:2. Perhaps some that durst not destroy it, yet hid it there, out of ill will to the Jews, that they might lose the benefit of it. But Providence so ordered that it came to light; and it is here inserted, Ezra 6:3-5. 1. Here is a warrant for the building of the temple: Let the house of God at Jerusalem, yea, let that house be built (so it may be read), within such and such dimensions, and with such and such materials. 2. A warrant for the taking of the expenses of the building out of the king's revenue, Ezra 6:4. We do not find that they had received what was here ordered them, the face of things at court being soon changed. 3. A warrant for the restoring of the vessels and utensils of the temple, which Nebuchadnezzar had taken away (Ezra 6:5), with an order that the priests, the Lord's ministers, should return them all to their places in the house of God.
II.The confirmation of it by a decree of Darius, grounded upon it and in pursuance of it.
1.The decree of Darius is very explicit and satisfactory.
(1.)He forbids his officers to do any thing in opposition to the building of the temple. The manner of expression intimates that he knew they had a mind to hinder it: Be you far hence (Ezra 6:6); let the work of this house of God alone, Ezra 6:7. Thus was the wrath of the enemy made to praise God and the remainder thereof did he restrain.
(2.)He orders them out of his own revenue to assist the builders with money,
[1.]For carrying on the building, Ezra 6:8. Herein he pursues the example of Cyrus, Ezra 6:4.
[2.]For maintaining the sacrifices there when it was built, Ezra 6:9. He ordered that they should be supplied with every thing they wanted both for burnt-offerings and meat-offerings. He was content it should be a rent-charge upon his revenue, and ordered it to be paid every day, and this without fail, that they might offer sacrifices and prayers with them (for the patriarchs, when they offered sacrifice, called on the name of the Lord, so did Samuel, Elijah, and others) for the life (that is, the happiness and prosperity) of the king and his sons, Ezra 6:10. See here how he gives honour, First, To Israel's God, whom he calls once and again the God of heaven. Secondly, To his ministers, in ordering his commissioners to give out supplies for the temple service at the appointment of the priests. Those that thought to control them must now be, in this matter, at their command. It was a new thing for God's priests to have such an interest in the public money. Thirdly, To prayer: That they may pray for the life of the king. He knew they were a praying people, and had heard that God was nigh to them in all that which they called upon him for. He was sensible he needed their prayers and might receive benefit by them, and was kind to them in order that he might have an interest in their prayers. It is the duty of God's people to pray for those that are in authority over them, not only for the good and gentle, but also for the forward; but they are particularly bound in gratitude to pray for their protectors and benefactors; and it is the wisdom of princes to desire their prayers, and to engage them. Let not the greatest princes despise the prayers of the meanest saints; it is desirable to have them for us, and dreadful to have them against us.
(3.)He enforces his decree with a penalty (Ezra 6:11): "Let none either oppose the work and service of the temple or withhold the supports granted to it by the crown upon pain of death. If any alter this decree, let him be (hanged before his own door as we say), hanged upon a beam of his own house, and, as an execrable man, let his house be made a dunghill."
(4.)He entails a divine curse upon all those kings and people that should ever have any hand in the destruction of this house, Ezra 6:12. What he would not do himself for the protection of the temple he desired that God, to whom vengeance belongs, would do. This bespeaks him zealous in the cause; and though this temple was, at length, most justly destroyed by the righteous hand of God, yet perhaps the Romans, who were the instruments of that destruction, felt the effects of this curse, for that empire sensibly declined ever after.
2.From all this we learn,
(1.)That the heart of kings is in the hand of God, and he turns it which way soever he pleases; what they are he makes them to be, for he is King of kings.
(2.)That when God's time has come for the accomplishing of his gracious purposes concerning his church he will raise up instruments to promote them from whom such good service was not expected. The earth sometimes helps the woman (Revelation 12:16), and those are made use of for the defence of religion who have little religion themselves.
(3.)That what is intended for the prejudice of the church has often, by the overruling providence of God, been made serviceable to it, Philippians 1:12. The enemies of the Jews, in appealing to Darius, hoped to get an order to suppress them, but, instead of that, they got an order to supply them. Thus out of the eater comes forth meat. The apocryphal Esdras (or Ezra), Book 1 ch. 3 and 4, gives another account of this decree in favour of the Jews, that Darius had vowed that if ever he came to the kingdom he would build the temple at Jerusalem, and that Zerubbabel, who was one of his attendants (whereas it is plain here that he was now at Jerusalem), for making an ingenious discourse before him on that subject (Great is the truth and will prevail), was told to ask what recompence he would, and asked only for this order, in pursuance of the king's vow.
Historical interpretation
Two Centuries of Reception
5 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
And there was nothing astonishing in God having done this,-He who, when, during the captivity of the people under Nebuchadnezzar, the Scriptures had been corrupted, and when, after seventy years, the Jews had returned to their own land, then, in the times of Artaxerxes king of the Persians, inspired Esdras the priest, of the tribe of Levi, to recast all the words of the former prophets, and to re-establish with the people the Mosaic legislation.
After the destruction of Jerusalem by the Babylonian storming of it, every document of the Jewish literature is generally agreed to have been restored through Ezra. [On the Apparel of Women 1.3]
And this was nothing wonderful for God to do, who, in the captivity of the people under Nebuchadnezzar, when the Scriptures had been destroyed, and the Jews had returned to their own country after seventy years, afterwards, in the time of Artaxerxes, king of the Persians, inspired Ezra the priest, of the tribe of Levi, to relate all the words of the former prophets, and to restore to the people the legislation of Moses. [quoting Irenaeus, Church History 5.8.15]
Whether you choose to say that Moses was the author of the Pentateuch, or that Ezra was the restorer of the same work, I have no objections. [Adversus Helvidium]
Ezra, the priest of God, restored the law, which had been burned by the Chaldeans in the archives of the temple. For indeed he was full of the same spirit with which the Scriptures had previously been filled. [De Mirabilibus Sacrae Scripturae, 2.33]
Continue studying Ezra 6:7 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
The king commands that the work be left alone and that the governor and elders of the Jews build the house of God on its own site.
“Let the work of this house of God alone;”
Shᵉbaq, to quit or let remain, applied to the ʻăbîydâh, the labour of rebuilding. This half of the order removes the hindrance.
“let the governor of the Jews and the elders of the Jews”
Zerubbabel and the leaders of the community are named as the ones with the right and the duty to build.
“build this house of God in his place.”
Bᵉnâʼ, to build. This half commands the work to continue, on the temple’s own original site.
Passage studyEzra 6:6–12
Darius Orders the Temple Built and Paid For
Summary
King Darius has found the decree of Cyrus, and he now writes to the officials who questioned the Jews. He orders them to keep away from the work, to pay its costs out of the royal tribute, and to supply the animals and food for the daily offerings, so that the priests may offer sacrifices to the God of heaven and pray for the king and his sons. He ends with a fearful penalty for anyone who changes his word, and he calls on God himself to guard the house. Through all of it the LORD is turning the heart of a pagan king to protect his people and finish his house.
How this decree came to be written
The exiles came home from Babylon under the decree of Cyrus (Ezra 1:1–4) and began to rebuild the temple that Nebuchadnezzar had destroyed. The peoples around them opposed the work (Ezra 4:4–5), and the building of the house of God ceased until the second year of Darius (Ezra 4:24). Then God sent the prophets Haggai and Zechariah. Haggai called the people to build (Haggai 1:1–11), and Zechariah promised that Zerubbabel’s hands would finish the house, “Not by might, nor by power, but by my spirit, saith the LORD of hosts” (Zechariah 4:6–10).
When the building began again, Tatnai the governor came and asked who had given the Jews authority to build, and he wrote to the king about it (Ezra 5:1–5). Darius had the royal archives searched, and the decree of Cyrus was found at Ecbatana. It authorized the rebuilding and provided for its cost (Ezra 6:1–5). Our passage is the king’s own answer to Tatnai.
Darius I reigned over the Persian Empire from 522 to 486 BC and was known as an able and orderly ruler. Persian kings often let subject peoples return to their lands and rebuild their holy places as long as they stayed loyal, a policy for which the Cyrus Cylinder is the famous example. Royal decrees were recorded in the state archives and were binding, which is why a search of the records could settle the matter. The letter stands in the part of Ezra written in Aramaic (Ezra 4:8–6:18), the common language of the empire’s western provinces.
Ezra 4 also records a letter from king Artaxerxes commanding that building cease (Ezra 4:21). The letter of Darius runs the other way, since it protects the work and pays for it.
The officials are ordered to keep away
Darius writes to the men who had raised the question, and his first order to them is “be ye far from thence.” The Aramaic word rachîyq means far or remote, of place or in a figurative sense, and with the command “be ye” it tells them to keep their distance from Jerusalem and from the work. They are to stop interfering, and they are to stay clear of anything that would intimidate the builders.
There is irony here. The men who came to Jerusalem asking by whose authority the Jews were building are now told by the highest authority on earth to stand back. The LORD did the same in Nehemiah’s day, when mockers scorned the builders of the wall and Nehemiah answered that the God of heaven would prosper them (Nehemiah 2:19–20), and when he could later say that “God had brought their counsel to nought” (Nehemiah 4:15). It is the care the psalm promises: “The LORD shall preserve thee from all evil” (Psalm 121:7–8).
Who were Tatnai, Shetharboznai and the Apharsachites?
Tatnai was the Persian governor of the province “beyond the river” (Aramaic ʻabar nahara), the wide region west of the Euphrates that took in Judah, Samaria, Syria and Phoenicia. The word for governor, pechâh, is used of a prefect or governor, and Tatnai was the highest Persian authority in the region where the temple stood, responsible for its administration, its taxes and its order. Shetharboznai was another high official who worked with him.
Their “companions” are their colleagues, for kᵉnâth means an associate who shares the same office. The Apharsachites, ʼĂpharçᵉkay, were most likely a class of Persian officials serving under Tatnai, though the name may belong to a particular people. By naming all of them, and by saying “beyond the river” twice in verse 6, the king makes sure that every level of the provincial government is bound by what follows.
“Let the work of this house of God alone”
Verse 7 gives the order in two halves. First the officials are to leave the work alone. The verb shᵉbaq means to quit or to let something remain, and the “work”, ʻăbîydâh, is the labour or business of rebuilding. Then the builders are positively authorized: the governor and the elders of the Jews are to build, and bᵉnâʼ is the ordinary Aramaic verb for building. So the decree clears the obstacle away and then commands the work to go on.
The “governor of the Jews” is Zerubbabel, the civil leader of the returned community, and the elders stand for the people’s wider leadership. The work is put in the hands of those who rightly lead God’s people. The words “house of God” stand twice in verse 7, and they keep before us whose house this is, so that hindering it would mean opposing the God of the Jews as well as the Jews.
“In his place” means on its own site. The temple is to rise where Solomon’s temple stood, on the ground God had chosen in Jerusalem. For the exiles this house was the centre of their worship and sacrifice and the sign of God dwelling among them. Its destruction by the Babylonians had come as judgment on Israel’s unfaithfulness, and its rebuilding meant that worship according to the law of Moses could begin again.
The king’s tribute pays for the building
Darius now goes further than Tatnai could have expected. “Moreover I make a decree,” he says, and the word for decree, ṭᵉʻêm, comes from a root meaning flavour and is used figuratively for judgment or account, and here for a formal royal command. The officials are told what they themselves must do for the elders of the Jews.
The “expenses”, niphqâʼ, an outgoing or cost, are to be paid from “the king’s goods, even of the tribute beyond the river.” The tribute was the tax collected from Tatnai’s own province, a large part of the crown’s income. Money gathered by a pagan empire for its own treasury is turned, by the king’s own word, to the building of the house of the God of Israel. It is to be given “forthwith”, at once, so that officials have no room to delay.
The purpose is “that they be not hindered.” The verb bᵉṭêl means to stop, to cease or to be idle. The work had ceased once before, and Darius means to see that it never stops again for want of money or because of opposition.
Why was Darius so generous? He was honouring the decree of Cyrus, as a king who valued law and order would. Supporting the worship of a subject people also helped to keep a key province loyal and quiet, and he may have had some respect for the God of the Jews. Behind all these reasons stands the LORD, who was providing for his house from a source the returned exiles, still poor and struggling to re-establish themselves, could never have arranged. They would rightly have seen it as his favour.
What the priests are to be given each day
Verse 9 turns from the building to the worship that will go on inside it. “That which they have need of” uses chăshach, to be necessary, so the list that follows is what the services require. Moses had told Israel to bring their offerings to the place the LORD would choose (Deuteronomy 12:5–7), and the law sets out those offerings in detail (Leviticus 1–7).
The young bullocks, rams and lambs are for the burnt offerings. The Aramaic ʻălâh answers to the Hebrew ‘olah, the offering in which the whole animal was burned on the altar. It spoke of complete dedication to God and of atonement, and it was at the heart of Israel’s worship, including the sacrifices offered every morning and evening.
The other four items served the offerings that went with them. Wheat was for the grain offerings. Salt belonged to every offering as “the salt of the covenant” (Leviticus 2:13), a sign that God’s covenant endures. Wine was poured out as a drink offering, and oil was used for anointing, for the lamps and with the grain offerings.
All of this is to be supplied “according to the appointment of the priests which are at Jerusalem.” The king’s officers do as the priests say, so the worship of God is ordered by those God appointed to order it. And it is to be given “day by day without fail.” The word shâlûw means a fault, an error or a thing amiss, and the phrase requires a supply with no lapse or neglect in it, because the offerings were daily.
Haggai had shown the people what came of neglecting the house. In Nehemiah’s time they would bind themselves to supply its needs from their own produce (Nehemiah 10:32–39). Here, while they are still weak, God provides through the king. He is the God who fed Israel with manna each day in the wilderness and who teaches us to pray, “Give us this day our daily bread” (Matthew 6:11).
Sweet savours and prayer for the king
Verse 10 gives the king’s purpose. The priests are to “offer sacrifices of sweet savours unto the God of heaven.” The Aramaic nîychôwach answers to the Hebrew nihoah, the word the books of Moses use for an offering that is pleasing and acceptable to God. When Noah offered after the flood, “the LORD smelled a sweet savour” (Genesis 8:21), and the burnt offering of the law is called “a sweet savour unto the LORD” (Leviticus 1:9). The picture is of the smoke rising to God and of God accepting the worshipper.
The word for God, ʼĕlâhh, is the Aramaic word for God, corresponding to the Hebrew Eloah. The title “the God of heaven” (Elah Shemaya) is frequent in Ezra and Nehemiah. It was a title for a supreme deity that the nations of that day used and a Persian king could readily adopt, and it speaks truly of the LORD, who rules from heaven over every land and is the God of far more than one nation.
The priests are also to “pray for the life of the king, and of his sons.” The verb tsᵉlâʼ means to pray, and also to bow, so it carries the thought of humble petition. The prayer for his sons looks to the succession, since a peaceful passing of the throne meant stability for the whole empire, the Jews included.
Why would a pagan king pay for the temple and ask for its prayers?
Darius acted as kings of his day commonly did, showing favour to the gods of the peoples they ruled in the hope of blessing on their own reign. He regarded the God of heaven as a powerful God whose favour was worth having, and he believed that the prayers of this God’s priests would do him and his dynasty good. It was a matter of policy for him, and nothing in the decree shows him turning to the LORD as his own God. Yet in his own way he bears witness that the God of Israel hears the prayers of his people, and God used the king’s policy to restore the worship he had commanded.
Does this mean we should pray for rulers who oppose the faith?
Scripture tells us to pray for all who are in authority, and Paul gives the reason: “that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty” (1 Timothy 2:1–2). The priests in Jerusalem prayed for a king who did not worship the LORD. Praying for a ruler is a different act from approving his character or his policies. It asks God to give him wisdom and to grant the peace in which God’s people can live godly lives, and it confesses that God rules over every ruler, for “the powers that be are ordained of God” (Romans 13:1–7).
The penalty for altering the king’s word
Darius backs his decree with a threat. “Whosoever” covers anyone of any rank. To “alter” is shᵉnâʼ, to change, and here it means any attempt to violate or undo the king’s command about the temple.
The punishment has two parts. A timber is to be pulled from the offender’s own house and set up, and he is to be “hanged thereon.” The verb zᵉqaph means to hang or impale, and also to set up, and the punishment was most likely impalement or crucifixion, a brutal public execution used by the Persians and other empires to deter others. The beam comes from the man’s own house, so the place of his security becomes the instrument of his death.
Then his house is to be “made a dunghill.” The word nᵉvâlûw means a sink or refuse heap. The house would be left defiled and uninhabitable, a lasting public mark of disgrace on the man and his family.
The harshness had a purpose. The work had been stopped before, and the king meant to make sure that nobody would dare to stop it again. In the Persian Empire the king’s word was law, and to defy it was to challenge the king himself.
The God who has caused his name to dwell there
In the last verse of the decree the king looks past his own power. He calls on “the God that hath caused his name to dwell there” to destroy any king or people who lift a hand against the house. Human penalties reach only so far, and a later king might be beyond the reach of Darius, so he hands such a one over to God.
The verb shᵉkan means to reside or stay, and it is related to the Hebrew shakan, from which the idea of the Shekinah, God’s glory dwelling among Israel in tabernacle and temple, is drawn. God is present everywhere, and the temple never contained him. For his name to dwell in Jerusalem means that he chose that place to make himself known, to be worshipped and to keep covenant with his people. His name stands for who he is, his character and authority and faithfulness.
Two dangers are named. To “alter” is the same word as in verse 11, shᵉnâʼ, and here it reaches to any change made to the house or to what it is for. To “destroy” the house is chăbal, to ruin or lay waste. God’s care covers the building and the worship for which it was built. “All kings and people” is strong and sweeping language, and it means that no rank on earth is exempt.
The decree ends with the king’s own name and a last command: “I Darius have made a decree; let it be done with speed.” The officials obeyed, and the house was finished in the sixth year of his reign (Ezra 6:15).
The king’s heart in the hand of the LORD
Every part of this decree is a king’s act, and every part of it is also God’s doing. “The king’s heart is in the hand of the LORD, as the rivers of water: he turneth it whithersoever he will” (Proverbs 21:1). God had already called Cyrus his anointed and promised to go before him, though Cyrus did not know him (Isaiah 45:1–7), and now he moves Darius to confirm and enlarge what Cyrus began.
No miracle is recorded here. God worked through a letter of complaint, a search of the archives, a king’s sense of legal duty and his wish for a quiet province. His providence is as real in the ordinary workings of government as in signs and wonders.
So the word God had spoken about his house came to pass. His word does not return to him empty (Isaiah 55:11), and he who begins a good work will perform it (Philippians 1:6). The builders worked hard, and still the psalm is true of this temple: “Except the LORD build the house, they labour in vain that build it” (Psalm 127:1).
Christ, the true temple and the better sacrifice
The house that Darius protected pointed forward to a greater one. Jesus said, “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up”, and he was speaking of the temple of his body (John 2:19–21). In him “dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily” (Colossians 2:9), so he is the true place where God’s name dwells. Men did put their hands to destroy that temple at the cross, and God raised him on the third day. In the city to come there is no temple building at all, “for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the temple of it” (Revelation 21:22).
Christ is also the builder. He said, “I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it” (Matthew 16:18). Believers are built together on him as the chief corner stone into a holy temple (Ephesians 2:19–22), as living stones in a spiritual house (1 Peter 2:5), and each believer’s body is a temple of the Holy Ghost (1 Corinthians 6:19). As Darius ordered the opposers to stand far off, so Christ at the cross “spoiled principalities and powers” and triumphed over them openly (Colossians 2:15), and he gives his people power over all the power of the enemy (Luke 10:19). The king wanted his decree carried out with speed, and Christ has sent his church to all nations with the promise that he is with them always (Matthew 28:19–20).
The daily bullocks, rams and lambs had to be offered again and again, “for it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins” (Hebrews 10:4). They pointed to “the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29). Christ entered the holy place once by his own blood (Hebrews 9:11–14) and has no need to offer daily, having offered himself once (Hebrews 7:27). His was the truly pleasing sacrifice, “an offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweetsmelling savour” (Ephesians 5:2), and through it we have boldness to draw near to God (Hebrews 10:19–22).
The priests prayed for the life of a king and his sons. We have a King who prays for us. Christ “ever liveth to make intercession” for those who come to God by him (Hebrews 7:25), at the right hand of God (Romans 8:34). The God of heaven whom Darius honoured from a distance is made known in him, who is “the image of the invisible God” (Colossians 1:15), the brightness of his glory and his final word to us (Hebrews 1:1–3), the “KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS” (Revelation 19:16).
The penalty of verse 11 has its own echo. The KJV says the offender was to be “hanged” on timber, and the apostles use that English word of Jesus, “whom ye slew and hanged on a tree” (Acts 5:30). The lawbreaker in Darius’s decree bore his own curse and shame. Christ bore ours, being “made a curse for us” (Galatians 3:13) and made “to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him” (2 Corinthians 5:21).
What this decree gives us
This passage shows us a God who rules the rulers. The officials who questioned the work, the taxes of the province and the king’s own heart were all in his hand, and he turned each of them to serve his house. When the work of God meets opposition, delay or an empty purse, we are looking at things he has overruled before, often by means that nobody was expecting.
It shows us that God provides what his worship needs. He supplied the temple “day by day without fail”, and the promise to us is that “my God shall supply all your need according to his riches in glory by Christ Jesus” (Philippians 4:19). Sometimes he does it through the gifts of his own people, and the king’s concern that the builders “be not hindered” is a good measure for how we support those who do his work.
The daily offerings have their counterpart in the Christian life. Our sacrifices now are our own bodies, presented as “a living sacrifice” (Romans 12:1), and “the sacrifice of praise to God continually” (Hebrews 13:15). The same steadiness belongs to prayer and to the word that is a lamp to our feet (Psalm 119:105), and to our prayers for those who govern us.
And the two words of warning, “alter” and “destroy”, tell us how much God cares for his house. He guards its purity as well as its walls, which is a sober thought for anyone whose teaching, division or neglect would damage his church, and a strong comfort for all who love it.
Ezra 6:6
“Now therefore,”
The king has read the decree of Cyrus, and this is his conclusion from it. What follows rests on that earlier decree.
“Tatnai, governor beyond the river, Shetharboznai, and your companions the Apharsachites,”
The recipients are named one by one. Tatnai is the pechâh, the governor, and the kᵉnâth, his colleagues, include the officials called ʼĂpharçᵉkay.
“which are beyond the river,”
The second mention of their territory fixes the scope of the order: it binds the whole provincial government west of the Euphrates.
“be ye far from thence:”
The core of the verse. Rachîyq means far or remote, and the order is to keep away from Jerusalem and from the work.
Ezra 6:7 This verse
“Let the work of this house of God alone;”
Shᵉbaq, to quit or let remain, applied to the ʻăbîydâh, the labour of rebuilding. This half of the order removes the hindrance.
“let the governor of the Jews and the elders of the Jews”
Zerubbabel and the leaders of the community are named as the ones with the right and the duty to build.
“build this house of God in his place.”
Bᵉnâʼ, to build. This half commands the work to continue, on the temple’s own original site.
Ezra 6:8
“Moreover I make a decree what ye shall do to the elders of these Jews”
The officials who came to question the elders are now given duties toward them. The decree is a ṭᵉʻêm, a formal royal command.
“that of the king’s goods, even of the tribute beyond the river,”
The money comes from the crown’s own revenue, the taxes of the very province Tatnai governs.
“forthwith expenses be given unto these men,”
Niphqâʼ, the costs of the work, are to be paid at once.
“that they be not hindered.”
Bᵉṭêl, to stop or cease. The funding exists so that the work is never brought to a halt again.
Ezra 6:9
“And that which they have need of,”
Chăshach, to be necessary. The supply is measured by what the services require.
“both young bullocks, and rams, and lambs, for the burnt offerings of the God of heaven,”
The animals of the ʻălâh, the offering wholly burned on the altar, the sign of complete dedication.
“wheat, salt, wine, and oil,”
The things offered with the sacrifices: grain, the salt of the covenant, the drink offering, and oil.
“according to the appointment of the priests which are at Jerusalem,”
The priests decide what is needed and the king’s officers supply it.
“let it be given them day by day without fail:”
A daily supply for a daily worship, with nothing amiss in it (shâlûw).
Ezra 6:10
“That they may offer sacrifices of sweet savours unto the God of heaven,”
The purpose of the supply. Nîychôwach is the word for an offering God accepts with pleasure, and ʼĕlâhh is the Aramaic word for God.
“and pray for the life of the king,”
Tsᵉlâʼ, to pray or to bow. Darius wants the priests of this God to intercede for him.
“and of his sons.”
The prayer extends to his heirs, and so to the stability of the throne.
Ezra 6:11
“Also I have made a decree,”
The king speaks in his own person, and what follows carries the force of imperial law.
“that whosoever shall alter this word,”
Shᵉnâʼ, to change. The offence is any attempt to violate or undo the command, by anyone at all.
“let timber be pulled down from his house, and being set up, let him be hanged thereon;”
Zᵉqaph, to hang or impale, and to set up. A beam of the man’s own house becomes the means of his public execution.
“and let his house be made a dunghill for this.”
Nᵉvâlûw, a refuse heap. What is left of his house becomes a lasting sign of his disgrace.
Ezra 6:12
“And the God that hath caused his name to dwell there”
Shᵉkan, to reside. Darius acknowledges that the God of Israel has chosen Jerusalem as the place of his name.
“destroy all kings and people, that shall put to their hand”
A curse that reaches where the king’s own penalty may fail, over rulers and nations alike who take action against the house.
“to alter and to destroy this house of God which is at Jerusalem.”
Shᵉnâʼ again, and chăbal, to ruin. Both the changing of the house and its demolition are covered.
“I Darius have made a decree; let it be done with speed.”
The king signs with his own name and requires prompt obedience.
Last revised