Skip to content
“Cyrus' Proclamation to Rebuild the Temple”· Ezra 1:1–4
Translation
King James Version
Thus saith Cyrus king of Persia, The LORD God of heaven hath given me all the kingdoms of the earth; and he hath charged me to build him an house at Jerusalem, which is in Judah.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Thus saith H559 Cyrus H3566 king H4428 of Persia H6539, The LORD H3068 God H430 of heaven H8064 hath given H5414 me all the kingdoms H4467 of the earth H776; and he hath charged H6485 me to build H1129 him an house H1004 at Jerusalem H3389, which is in Judah H3063.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
"Here is what Koresh king of Persia says: ADONAI, the God of heaven, has given me all the kingdoms on earth; and he has charged me to build him a house in Yerushalayim, in Y'hudah.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
“This is what Cyrus king of Persia says: ‘The LORD, the God of heaven, who has given me all the kingdoms of the earth, has appointed me to build a house for Him at Jerusalem in Judah.
Ask
American Standard Version
Thus saith Cyrus king of Persia, All the kingdoms of the earth hath Jehovah, the God of heaven, given me; and he hath charged me to build him a house in Jerusalem, which is in Judah.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
“Thus says Cyrus king of Persia, ‘The LORD, the God of heaven, has given me all the kingdoms of the earth; and he has commanded me to build him a house in Jerusalem, which is in Judah.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Thus saith Cyrus King of Persia, The Lord God of heauen hath giuen me all the kingdomes of the earth, and he hath commanded me to builde him an house in Ierusalem, which is in Iudah.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
`Thus said Cyrus king of Persia, All kingdoms of the earth hath Jehovah, God of the heavens, given to me, and He hath laid a charge on me to build to Him a house in Jerusalem, that is in Judah;
Ask
In the KJVVerse 12,019 of 31,102 · 38.6%

Study This Verse

Summary

Ezra 1:2 records the momentous and divinely orchestrated decree issued by King Cyrus of Persia, a pivotal declaration that initiated the long-awaited end of the seventy-year Babylonian exile for the Jewish people. In this historic proclamation, Cyrus explicitly acknowledges "The LORD God of heaven" as the ultimate source of his vast dominion over all earthly kingdoms and states that this sovereign God has specifically charged him with the sacred task of rebuilding His sacred house, the Temple, at Jerusalem, which is located in Judah. This verse serves as the foundational statement for the entire narrative of restoration that unfolds in the book of Ezra, powerfully highlighting God's absolute sovereignty and His active hand in orchestrating global events to faithfully fulfill His ancient promises to His covenant people.

Context

Literary Context

Ezra 1:2 immediately follows Ezra 1:1, which masterfully sets the theological stage by declaring that "in the first year of Cyrus king of Persia, that the word of the LORD by the mouth of Jeremiah might be fulfilled, the LORD stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia, that he made a proclamation throughout all his kingdom, and put it also in writing." This opening verse unequivocally establishes the divine impetus behind Cyrus's decree, framing it not as a mere political maneuver but as a direct fulfillment of prophecy and a testament to God's active, sovereign intervention in human history. Verse 2 then presents the precise content of this divinely inspired proclamation, detailing the specific mandate given to Cyrus. This decree subsequently paves the way for the following verses Ezra 1:3-4, which outline the permissions granted to the exiles—the right to return to Jerusalem—and the call for material and financial assistance in rebuilding the Temple. The entire first chapter of Ezra thus functions as a crucial prologue, explaining how the return from exile, a central theme of the post-exilic period, was made possible through God's sovereign work, even through the agency of a pagan king.

Historical & Cultural Context

The decree of Cyrus in 538 BC (his first year as ruler of Babylon, following his conquest of the city in 539 BC) marks a monumental turning point in ancient Near Eastern history. The preceding Babylonian Empire, under Nebuchadnezzar, had enforced a brutal policy of forced deportation and cultural assimilation of conquered peoples, exemplified by the destruction of Jerusalem and the exile of its inhabitants in 586 BC. In stark contrast, the burgeoning Persian Empire, under the visionary leadership of Cyrus the Great, implemented a remarkably different policy characterized by religious tolerance and the repatriation of various ethnic groups to their homelands, allowing them to rebuild their temples and worship their gods. This enlightened policy is not only attested in the biblical narrative but is also corroborated by extra-biblical sources, most notably the Cyrus Cylinder, which describes Cyrus's general practice of restoring cults and returning peoples to their lands. For the Jewish exiles, this decree signified the miraculous end of seventy years of captivity, precisely as prophesied by Jeremiah (Jeremiah 29:10). The specific mention of Jerusalem and Judah in the decree underscores the unique importance of this particular location as the spiritual, national, and ancestral center for the Jewish people, setting them apart from other repatriated groups.

Key Themes

Ezra 1:2 powerfully articulates several foundational themes that resonate throughout the book of Ezra and indeed, the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it profoundly underscores Divine Sovereignty, demonstrating God's absolute and unchallengeable control over all nations, their rulers, and the unfolding of human history. Even a powerful pagan king like Cyrus is depicted as an unwitting, yet willing, instrument in God's hands, fulfilling His divine purposes (Proverbs 21:1). Secondly, the verse highlights the meticulous Fulfillment of Prophecy, particularly those concerning the seventy-year exile and the specific role of Cyrus himself, as foretold by the prophet Isaiah centuries earlier (Isaiah 44:28 and Isaiah 45:1-4). This reinforces God's unwavering faithfulness to His spoken word and His meticulous planning of all historical events. Thirdly, the verse emphatically emphasizes God's Initiative in Restoration. The crucial phrase "he hath charged me" reveals that the impetus for the return and the rebuilding of the Temple did not originate from Cyrus's political expediency or benevolence alone, but from God's direct and authoritative command. This demonstrates His unwavering commitment to His covenant people and His fervent desire to restore true worship in Jerusalem. This divine initiative is further emphasized in Ezra 1:1, which states that "the LORD stirred up the spirit of Cyrus."

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

LORD God of heaven Yᵉhôvâh_ ʼĕlôhîym _shâmayim' H3068

This profound and comprehensive title, surprisingly uttered by a pagan king, emphasizes God's universal dominion, transcendence, and unique identity. "Yᵉhôvâh" (H3068) is the personal, covenant name of Israel's God, revealing His self-existent and eternal nature. "ʼĕlôhîym" (H430) is the general term for God, often used to denote the supreme God. The addition of "shâmayim" (H8064), meaning "heaven," points to His supreme authority over all earthly powers and His cosmic rule, distinguishing Him from local or national deities. For Cyrus to acknowledge this specific God, rather than his own vast pantheon, as the singular source of his immense power and the one who "charged" him, is a profound and almost unparalleled testament to Yahweh's unparalleled authority and influence over the affairs of nations. It implies a recognition, however partial or pragmatic, of Yahweh's unique status as the ultimate sovereign.

charged pâqad' H6485

This verb (H6485) carries a rich semantic range, including "to visit (with friendly or hostile intent); by analogy, to oversee, muster, charge, care for, miss, deposit, etc." In this context, it conveys a strong sense of appointment, visitation, or commissioning. It implies a divine imperative, not merely a suggestion or a political calculation. When God "charges" someone, it signifies a direct, authoritative, and binding assignment of responsibility. Here, it means God has specifically laid upon Cyrus the solemn duty and privilege of building His house. This is a divine mandate, underscoring that Cyrus's decree is not merely a human policy but an act orchestrated by God for His specific redemptive purposes.

house bayith' H1004

While "bayith" (H1004) can broadly refer to a physical dwelling, a family, or even a palace, in this specific context, it unequivocally refers to the Temple in Jerusalem. The Temple was far more than just a building; it was the central place of worship, sacrifice, and the symbolic dwelling place of God's tangible presence (Shekinah) among His people. Its destruction in 586 BC was the ultimate sign of judgment and exile, a profound rupture in the covenant relationship. Therefore, its rebuilding signified not merely architectural reconstruction but spiritual restoration, renewed covenant relationship, the re-establishment of proper worship, and the return of God's favor to His people. Cyrus's decree, therefore, is fundamentally about restoring the spiritual heart of the Jewish nation.

Verse Breakdown

"Thus saith Cyrus king of Persia"

This opening phrase formally establishes the unassailable authority of the speaker. Cyrus, as the king of the vast and dominant Persian Empire, wielded immense power, and his decrees carried absolute, binding weight throughout his dominion. This formal declaration sets the tone for a binding and profoundly significant proclamation, ensuring that the words that follow are understood as official, imperial policy emanating from the highest earthly authority.

"The LORD God of heaven hath given me all the kingdoms of the earth"

This is an astonishing and remarkable confession from a polytheistic pagan monarch. Cyrus attributes his immense power, global dominion, and military successes not to his own gods, his strategic brilliance, or his formidable military might, but unequivocally to "The LORD God of heaven," the God of Israel. This statement powerfully underscores God's absolute and unchallenged sovereignty over all earthly rulers and kingdoms, demonstrating His unique ability to use even non-believers, who may not fully comprehend Him, to accomplish His divine and overarching will. It reveals that God's power extends far beyond the geographical and cultural borders of Israel, actively orchestrating global events for His purposes.

"and he hath charged me to build him an house at Jerusalem, which [is] in Judah"

This crucial clause reveals the specific, divine mandate given directly to Cyrus. The very same God who supernaturally granted him dominion has now commissioned him with a precise and sacred task: to rebuild His "house," the Temple, in the holy city of Jerusalem. The meticulous geographical specification, "which is in Judah," serves to emphasize the specific identity of the people (the Judeans/Jews) and the precise sacred location connected to this divine task. This is the core purpose of the decree from God's perspective, highlighting His unwavering faithfulness to His covenant promises and His fervent desire for the restoration of true worship in His designated dwelling place.

Literary Devices

Ezra 1:2 employs several potent literary devices to convey its profound theological and historical message. The most prominent is Divine Sovereignty, where God is portrayed as actively and directly working through human agents, even a pagan king, to achieve His predetermined purposes. This highlights God's absolute control over all earthly powers, political machinations, and historical events, demonstrating that His will cannot be thwarted by human resistance or circumstance. The verse also functions as a Royal Proclamation or Edict, a formal and authoritative declaration from a king, which lends it immense legal and historical weight within the ancient Near Eastern context. Furthermore, the explicit and surprisingly reverent mention of "The LORD God of heaven" by Cyrus can be seen as a striking Irony or Paradox, as a polytheistic ruler acknowledges the monotheistic God of Israel as the singular source of his power and accepts a divine commission from Him. This unexpected recognition underscores the unique power, influence, and undeniable reality of Yahweh, even among those who do not explicitly worship Him. The entire passage also serves as a foundational Fulfillment Narrative, directly referencing and demonstrating the precise execution of prior prophecies concerning the return from exile and the rebuilding of the Temple.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Ezra 1:2 stands as a powerful and enduring testament to God's unwavering faithfulness and His absolute, comprehensive sovereignty over all of creation and the intricate tapestry of human history. It profoundly demonstrates that God's grand plan of redemption is not confined to the actions of His covenant people alone but extends to His meticulous orchestrating of global politics, the rise and fall of empires, and even the hearts of powerful kings. This verse profoundly illustrates that even when His people are in a state of judgment and exile due to their disobedience, God remains utterly committed to His promises, actively working behind the scenes to bring about their restoration and the fulfillment of His divine word. The unexpected instrument of a pagan king underscores that God is not limited by human expectations, conventional political means, or even the spiritual state of His chosen agents, but can use anyone and anything to accomplish His sovereign will, ultimately for the glory of His name and the eternal well-being of His people.

Reflection and Application

Ezra 1:2 offers profound encouragement and a powerful, timeless reminder of God's active, personal, and sovereign involvement in our world and in our individual lives. In times of uncertainty, political upheaval, national crises, or deep personal hardship, this verse assures us with unwavering certainty that God remains firmly on His throne, sovereign over all circumstances, seen and unseen. Just as He miraculously used Cyrus, a seemingly unlikely and pagan instrument, to achieve His redemptive purposes for Israel, so too can He use unexpected individuals, unforeseen events, or even difficult and painful situations in our lives to bring about His good, perfect, and ultimate will. This profound truth calls us to cultivate a deeper, more resilient trust in His overarching plan, even when we cannot discern the immediate path forward or understand the reasons for our present trials. It challenges us to look beyond immediate appearances and to recognize God's invisible yet powerful hand at work in the broader tapestry of history and in the intimate details of our personal journeys, knowing with absolute conviction that His promises are unfailing and His redemptive purposes will ultimately prevail. We are invited to pray with confidence and audacious faith, knowing that the God who stirred the heart of a mighty Persian king can certainly move powerfully and precisely in our specific situations and circumstances.

Questions for Reflection

  1. How does Cyrus's acknowledgment of "The LORD God of heaven" challenge or expand your understanding of God's absolute sovereignty over all nations, rulers, and global events?
  2. In what specific areas of your life, or in current global events, do you need to trust more deeply in God's ability to use unexpected means, unlikely people, or even challenging circumstances to accomplish His perfect will?
  3. Considering the precise fulfillment of ancient prophecy in this verse, how does God's demonstrated faithfulness to His ancient promises encourage and strengthen your faith regarding His promises for your own life and future?
  4. What "exiles" or prolonged periods of spiritual, emotional, or relational hardship in your life might God be working sovereignly to bring to an end, and how might He be using unexpected instruments or surprising pathways to bring about His intended restoration?

FAQ

How could a pagan king like Cyrus know or acknowledge "The LORD God of heaven"?

While the biblical text does not explicitly detail the precise mechanism of Cyrus's knowledge or acknowledgment, several possibilities exist. Firstly, the Jewish exiles, particularly prominent figures like Daniel (who served in the Babylonian and early Persian courts, as extensively documented in the book of Daniel), likely played a significant role in making the God of Israel known to the ruling elite. Daniel's prophetic insights, his interpretations of dreams and visions, and his unwavering faithfulness, which often pointed to God's ultimate sovereignty over earthly kingdoms, could have profoundly influenced Cyrus. Secondly, Cyrus's general policy of religious tolerance and his pragmatic approach to governance might have led him to acknowledge the deities of conquered peoples, especially if he perceived their God as powerful or beneficial to his rule. Most importantly, the biblical text emphasizes that "the LORD stirred up the spirit of Cyrus" (Ezra 1:1), indicating a direct, supernatural divine influence on his heart and mind, regardless of his full theological understanding or personal devotion. This highlights God's remarkable ability to work through anyone, even those who do not fully know or worship Him, to accomplish His sovereign purposes (Isaiah 45:4-5).

Was Cyrus's decree unique to the Jewish people, or part of a broader policy?

Cyrus's decree concerning the Jewish exiles was indeed part of a broader, well-documented imperial policy of repatriation and religious restoration that he implemented across his vast Persian Empire. The Cyrus Cylinder, a famous ancient clay artifact, confirms that Cyrus generally allowed various deported peoples to return to their homelands and rebuild their cultic shrines and temples. However, the biblical account in Ezra 1:2-4 specifically details the unique and highly significant aspects of the decree concerning Jerusalem and the rebuilding of the Temple of "The LORD God of heaven." While the general policy of repatriation was widespread, the specific divine charge to rebuild a "house" for the God of Israel in Jerusalem, and the subsequent provision of substantial resources and sacred vessels for this task (as meticulously detailed in Ezra 1:4-11), strongly suggests a particular divine focus and special attention on the Jewish people and their unique spiritual center. God's sovereign hand ensured that His covenant people received specific and targeted attention within the broader imperial policy, fulfilling His ancient promises.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Ezra 1:2, with its profound declaration of divine sovereignty over earthly kings and the sacred commission to rebuild God's house, powerfully foreshadows the ultimate and far greater redemptive work of Jesus Christ. Just as Cyrus, a pagan king, was God's chosen and unlikely instrument to initiate the physical restoration of the Temple and the return of His exiled people, so Jesus Christ, the true King of kings and Lord of lords (Revelation 19:16), is the divine agent of a far more profound and eternal spiritual restoration. He is not merely charged to build a physical house of stone, but to build His church, the spiritual Temple of God, composed of living stones—believers from every nation, tribe, people, and language (Ephesians 2:19-22 and 1 Peter 2:5). The "kingdoms of the earth" given to Cyrus, vast as they were, pale in comparison to the universal and eternal authority granted to Jesus, who, after His resurrection, declared with absolute certainty, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me" (Matthew 28:18). The return from the physical exile under Cyrus thus prefigured the ultimate liberation from the spiritual exile of sin and death, a glorious freedom accomplished definitively through Christ's atoning sacrifice on the cross and His triumphant resurrection (Colossians 1:13-14). Therefore, Ezra 1:2 powerfully points us to Christ as the one through whom God's ultimate house is built, His people are truly gathered and reconciled, and His eternal, unshakable kingdom is established forever.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Ezra 1:1–4. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 4 verses
Passage under commentEzra 1:1–4
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

It will be proper for us here to consider, 1. What was the state of the captive Jews in Babylon. It was upon many accounts very deplorable; they were under the power of those that hated them, had nothing they could call their own; they had no temple, no altar; if they sang psalms, their enemies ridiculed them; and yet they had prophets among them. Ezekiel and Daniel were kept distinct from the heathen. Some of them were preferred at court, others had comfortable settlements in the country, and they were all borne up with hope that, in due time, they should return to their own land again, in expectation of which they preserved among them the distinction of their families, the knowledge of their religion, and an aversion to idolatry. 2. What was the state of the government under which they were. Nebuchadnezzar carried many of them into captivity in the first year of his reign, which was the fourth of Jehoiakim; he reigned forty-five years, his son Evil-merodach twenty-three, and his grandson Belshazzar three years, which make up the seventy years. So Dr. Lightfoot, It is charged upon Nebuchadnezzar that he opened not the house of his prisoners, Isa 14:17. And, if he had shown mercy to the poor Jews, Daniel told him it would have been the lengthening of his tranquillity, Dan 4:27. But the measure of the sins of Babylon was at length full, and then destruction was brought upon them by Darius the Mede and Cyrus the Persian, which we read of, Dan. 5. Darius, being old, left the government to Cyrus, and he was employed as the instrument of the Jews' deliverance, which he gave orders for as soon as ever he was master of the kingdom of Babylon, perhaps in contradiction to Nebuchadnezzar, whose family he had cut off, and because he took a pleasure in undoing what he had done, or in policy, to recommend his newly-acquired dominion as merciful and gentle, or (as some think) in a pious regard to the prophecy of Isaiah, which had been published, and well known, above 150 years before, where he was expressly named as the man that should do this for God, and for whom God would do great things (Isa 44:28; Isa 45:1, etc.), and which perhaps was shown to him by those about him. His name (some say) in the Persian language signifies the sun, for he brought light and healing to the church of God, and was an eminent type of Christ the Sun of righteousness. Some was that his name signifies a father, and Christ is the everlasting Father. Now here we are told,

I.Whence this proclamation took its rise.

The Lord stirred up the spirit of Cyrus. Note, The hearts of kings are in the hand of the Lord, and, like the rivulets of water, he turneth them which way soever he will. It is said of Cyrus that he knew not God, nor how to serve him; but God knew him, and how to serve himself by him, Isa 45:4. God governs the world by his influence on the spirits of men, and, whatever good is done at any time, it is God that stirs up the spirit to do it, puts thoughts into the mind, gives to the understanding to form a right judgment, and directs the will which way he pleases. Whatever good offices therefore are, at any time, done for the church of God, he must have the glory of them.

II.The reference it had to the prophecy of Jeremiah, by whom God had not only promised that they should return, but had fixed the time, which set time to favour Sion had now come. Seventy years were determined (Jer 25:12; Jer 29:10); and he that kept the promise made concerning Israel's deliverance out of Egypt to a day (Exo 12:41) was doubtless as punctual to this. What Cyrus now did was long since said to be the confirming of the word of God's servants, Isa 44:26. Jeremiah, while he lived, was hated and despised; yet thus did Providence honour him long after, that a mighty monarch was influenced to act in pursuance of the word of the Lord by his mouth.

III.The date of this proclamation.

It was in his first year, not the first of his reign over Persia, the kingdom he was born to, but the first of his reign over Babylon, the kingdom he had conquered. Those are much honoured whose spirits are stirred up to begin with God and to serve him in their first years.

IV.The publication of it, both by word of mouth (he caused a voice to pass throughout all his kingdom, like a jubilee-trumpet, a joyful sabbatical year after many melancholy ones, proclaiming liberty to the captives), and also in black and white: he put it in writing, that it might be the more satisfactory, and might be sent to those distant provinces where the ten tribes were scattered in Assyria and Media, Kg2 17:6.

V.The purport of this proclamation of liberty.

1.The preamble shows the causes and considerations by which he was influenced, Ezr 1:2. It should seem, his mind was enlightened with the knowledge of Jehovah (for so he calls him), the God of Israel, as the only living and true God, the God of heaven, who is the sovereign Lord and disposer of all the kingdoms of the earth; of him he says (Ezr 1:3), He is the God, God alone, God above all. Though he had not known God by education, God made him so far to know him now as that he did this service with an eye to him. He professes that he does it,

(1.)In gratitude to God for the favours he had bestowed upon him: The God of heaven has given me all the kingdoms of the earth. This sounds a little vain-glorious, for there were many kingdoms of the earth which he had nothing to do with; but he means that God had given him all that was given to Nebuchadnezzar, whose dominion, Daniel says, was to the end of the earth, Dan 4:22; Dan 5:19. Note, God is the fountain of power; the kingdoms of the earth are at his disposal; whatever share any have of them they have from him: and those whom God has entrusted with great power and large possessions should look upon themselves as obliged thereby to do much for him.

(2.)In obedience to God. He hat charged me to build him a house at Jerusalem; probably by a dream or vision of the night, confirmed by comparing it with the prophecy of Isaiah, where his doing it was foretold. Israel's disobedience to God's charge, which they were often told of, is aggravated by the obedience of this heathen king.

2.He gives free leave to all the Jews that were in his dominions to go up to Jerusalem, and to build the temple of the Lord there, Ezr 1:3. His regard to God made him overlook,

(1.)The secular interest of his government. It would have been his policy to keep so great a number of serviceable men in his dominions, and seemed impolitic to let them go and take root again in their own land; but piety is the best policy.

(2.)The honour of the religion of his country. Why did he not order them to build a temple to the gods of Babylon or Persia? He believed the God of Israel to be the God of heaven, and therefore obliged his Israel to worship him only. Let them walk in the name of the Lord their God.

3.He subjoins a brief for a collection to bear the charges of such as were poor and not able to bear their own, Ezr 1:4. "Whosoever remaineth, because he has not the means to bear his charges to Jerusalem, let the men of his place help him." Some take it as an order to the king's officers to supply them out of his revenue, as Ezr 6:8. But it may mean a warrant to the captives to ask and receive the alms and charitable contributions of all the king's loving subjects. And we may suppose the Jews had conducted themselves so well among their neighbours that they would be as forward to accommodate them because they loved them as the Egyptians were because they were weary of them. At least many would be kind to them because they saw the government would take it well. Cyrus not only gave his good wishes with those that went (Their God be with them, Ezr 1:3), but took care also to furnish them with such things as they needed. He took it for granted that those among them who were of ability would offer their free-will offerings for the house of God, to promote the rebuilding of it. But, besides that, he would have them supplied out of his kingdom. Well-wishers to the temple should be well-doers for it.

Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Ezra 1:2 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.