Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And thou shalt eat it as barley cakes, and thou shalt bake it with dung that cometh out of man, in their sight.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And thou shalt eat H398 it as barley H8184 cakes H5692, and thou shalt bake H5746 it with dung H1561 that cometh out H6627 of man H120, in their sight H5869.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
[The bread] you eat is to be baked like barley cakes; you are to bake it before their eyes, using human dung as fuel."
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
And you shall eat the food as you would a barley cake, after you bake it over dried human excrement in the sight of the people.”
Ask
American Standard Version
And thou shalt eat it as barley cakes, and thou shalt bake it in their sight with dung that cometh out of man.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
You shall eat it as barley cakes, and you shall bake it in their sight with dung that comes out of man.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And thou shalt eate it as barley cakes, and thou shalt bake it in the dongue that commeth out of man, in their sight.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
A barley-cake thou dost eat it, and it with dung--the filth of man--thou dost bake before their eyes.
Ask
In the KJVVerse 20,542 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Ezekiel 4:12 delivers a profoundly disturbing and symbolic command from God to the prophet Ezekiel, instructing him to prepare and consume meager barley cakes baked over human excrement. This grotesque act was not merely a bizarre illustration but a visceral, living parable designed to graphically portray the extreme famine, ritual defilement, and utter desperation that the inhabitants of Jerusalem would endure during the impending Babylonian siege and subsequent exile, serving as a stark warning of divine judgment against their persistent idolatry and rebellion.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is an integral part of a series of highly symbolic and physically demanding actions God commanded Ezekiel to perform in Ezekiel chapters 4 and 5. Preceding this specific command, Ezekiel was instructed to lie on his side for a prolonged period—390 days for Israel and 40 days for Judah—symbolizing the years of their iniquity and punishment (Ezekiel 4:4-6). He was also given a precise, meager ration of mixed grains and water to consume daily, representing the severe scarcity of food and drink during the siege (Ezekiel 4:9-11). The command to use human dung as fuel for baking, while initially resisted by Ezekiel, was the most shocking and defiling element, immediately followed by God's concession to allow animal dung, yet the original command underscored the depth of the defilement awaiting Jerusalem's inhabitants (Ezekiel 4:13). These acts collectively formed a powerful, visual sermon predicting the siege, famine, and exile.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Ezekiel prophesied during the Babylonian exile, specifically to the exiles in Babylon, while Jerusalem was still standing but under imminent threat. The people of Judah, particularly those remaining in Jerusalem, were largely complacent and believed God would not allow His temple or chosen city to fall. In ancient Near Eastern cultures, bread was a staple, and the method of its preparation was significant. Fuel sources were typically wood, charcoal, or dried animal dung, which was a common and acceptable fuel, especially in areas with limited wood. However, human excrement was universally regarded as abhorrent and ritually unclean, forbidden for use in food preparation by Mosaic law (Deuteronomy 23:12-14). The use of such a defiling substance for cooking would have been an extreme act of desperation, signifying a complete breakdown of societal norms and ritual purity, directly reflecting the moral and spiritual defilement of Jerusalem itself.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes in Ezekiel and the broader prophetic literature. It highlights the theme of Divine Judgment as a direct consequence of Israel's persistent idolatry and unfaithfulness, demonstrating God's unwavering commitment to uphold His covenant, both in blessing and curse. The act underscores the theme of Extreme Famine and Desperation, vividly illustrating the dire conditions that would force people to resort to the most unthinkable means for survival during the siege, a theme echoed in other prophetic warnings (Lamentations 4:10). Crucially, it emphasizes Ritual Defilement and Impurity, showing how Jerusalem's spiritual pollution through sin would manifest in physical and ritual impurity, forcing them to eat "defiled bread" among the Gentiles (Ezekiel 4:13). Finally, it exemplifies Prophetic Symbolism, where Ezekiel's body and actions become a living, shocking message, designed to pierce the complacency and denial of the people, forcing them to confront the grim reality of God's impending judgment.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • eat (Hebrew, ʼâkal', H398): This primitive root means "to eat" literally or figuratively, but here it denotes the physical consumption of the prepared food. In this context, it carries the weight of forced, desperate consumption, implying not nourishment but survival under duress, and also the symbolic ingestion of the consequences of sin.
  • dung (Hebrew, gêlel', H1561): This word specifically refers to "dung" or "balls of dung." In this context, it is explicitly qualified as "dung that cometh out of man," making it distinct from animal dung. This specification is crucial as it emphasizes the extreme ritual impurity and abomination associated with human waste, particularly when used for food preparation.
  • man (Hebrew, ʼâdâm', H120): This term refers to a human being, an individual or mankind. Its inclusion here ("dung that cometh out of man") precisely identifies the source of the defiling fuel, intensifying the shock and horror of the command, as it links the defilement directly to humanity's own fallen state and its consequences.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And thou shalt eat it [as] barley cakes": This clause establishes the nature of the food—simple, humble cakes made from barley, a grain associated with scarcity. The command to "eat it" underscores the personal, visceral involvement of Ezekiel in the prophecy, forcing him to embody the future suffering of his people.
  • "and thou shalt bake it with dung that cometh out of man": This is the most shocking and central element of the command. It specifies the fuel source as human excrement, a substance considered utterly unclean and an abomination for cooking according to Mosaic law. This detail graphically illustrates the extreme level of desperation and ritual defilement that Jerusalem's inhabitants would face during the siege, where all conventional and clean fuel sources would be exhausted.
  • "in their sight": This final phrase emphasizes the public and demonstrative nature of Ezekiel's act. The performance was not private but an open spectacle, ensuring that the people—the rebellious house of Israel—would witness the horrifying reality of their impending judgment and the depths of degradation to which they would be reduced. It was a visual sermon, impossible to ignore.

Literary Devices

Ezekiel 4:12 is replete with powerful literary devices, primarily Symbolism and Prophetic Act. Ezekiel's entire performance is a Prophetic Act, a living parable where his body and actions become the medium for God's message. The act of baking with human dung is a potent symbol of Extreme Famine and Ritual Defilement. The use of human waste, explicitly forbidden by Mosaic law, symbolizes the utter spiritual impurity of Jerusalem, whose sins had made them an abomination before God, leading to a physical manifestation of that defilement. There is also a strong element of Sensory Imagery, designed to evoke disgust and horror, making the impending judgment tangible and unforgettable. The command is an act of Divine Irony, as the people who had defiled themselves with idolatry would be forced to endure physical defilement, a direct consequence of their spiritual rebellion.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Ezekiel 4:12 serves as a stark theological declaration of God's unwavering justice and the severe consequences of persistent rebellion against His covenant. It underscores that sin, particularly idolatry and spiritual adultery, leads to profound defilement, which inevitably manifests in tangible, often horrifying, judgment. The command to use human excrement for fuel highlights the depth of God's abhorrence for impurity and His commitment to cleanse His people, even through such extreme measures. This passage reveals that God's judgments are not arbitrary but are a direct, proportional response to humanity's unfaithfulness, designed to bring about repentance or, failing that, to demonstrate His absolute sovereignty and holiness to a rebellious world.

  • Leviticus 26:26 - Foreshadows the breaking of bread supply and eating by weight during famine.
  • Deuteronomy 28:53 - Describes the extreme desperation of cannibalism during siege, a parallel to the abject conditions in Ezekiel.
  • Lamentations 2:11 - Depicts the physical suffering and starvation of children in Jerusalem during the siege, fulfilling the prophetic warnings.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Ezekiel 4:12, though graphically unsettling, offers profound lessons for contemporary believers. It serves as a visceral reminder that sin is not a trivial matter to God; it defiles and separates, leading to severe consequences. The extreme measures God commanded Ezekiel to undertake underscore the gravity of Israel's rebellion and the intensity of God's holy displeasure. For us, this passage calls us to a deeper understanding of the holiness of God and the defiling nature of sin in our own lives, urging us to take our spiritual purity seriously. It challenges our complacency, reminding us that God's warnings, though sometimes uncomfortable, are ultimately for our good, intended to draw us back to Him. We are called to examine our own hearts for areas of spiritual compromise, idolatry, or disobedience, recognizing that true repentance involves turning away from all forms of defilement and embracing a life of holiness, knowing that God's grace is sufficient to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the graphic nature of Ezekiel 4:12 challenge my understanding of God's holiness and His response to sin?
  • In what ways might I be complacent about sin in my own life, and what "defilement" might God be calling me to address?
  • How does this passage deepen my appreciation for the ultimate sacrifice of Christ, who bore our defilement?
  • What specific actions can I take to live a life that more fully reflects spiritual purity and obedience to God's word?

FAQ

Why did God command Ezekiel to use human dung, and did he actually do it?

Answer: God commanded Ezekiel to use human dung (H1561, gêlel) as fuel to bake his meager barley cakes (H5692, ʻuggâh) to graphically symbolize the extreme famine and ritual defilement that the inhabitants of Jerusalem would face during the Babylonian siege. This act was meant to shock the people into understanding the severity of their impending judgment. While animal dung was a common fuel source in the ancient world, human excrement was considered utterly abhorrent and ritually unclean, forbidden by Mosaic law (Deuteronomy 23:12-14). Ezekiel initially protested this command, stating, "Ah Lord GOD! behold, my soul hath not been polluted: for from my youth even till now have I not eaten of that which dieth of itself, or is torn in pieces; neither came there abominable flesh into my mouth" (Ezekiel 4:14). In response to Ezekiel's plea, God relented and allowed him to use cow's dung instead (Ezekiel 4:15), demonstrating God's compassion even amidst His severe judgments. However, the initial command powerfully conveyed the depth of the defilement and desperation that awaited Jerusalem.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Ezekiel 4:12, with its stark imagery of defilement and judgment, finds its ultimate and profound fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. The defilement symbolized by the human dung, representing the spiritual impurity of Israel's sin, points forward to the ultimate problem of humanity's sinfulness and its separation from a holy God. While Ezekiel's act was a prophetic sign of impending physical and ritual defilement, Christ came to address the root cause of all defilement: sin itself. He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, bearing the full weight of humanity's impurity and judgment on the cross (2 Corinthians 5:21). Through His sacrifice, Jesus offers a cleansing far beyond any ritual purification, a spiritual cleansing that makes us truly pure before God (Hebrews 9:14). The desperate famine for truth and righteousness that characterized rebellious Israel is met in Christ, who declares Himself the Bread of Life, offering eternal sustenance to all who believe. Thus, the horrifying defilement and judgment depicted in Ezekiel 4:12 serve as a dark backdrop against which the glorious light of Christ's perfect purity, atoning sacrifice, and life-giving provision shine all the more brightly, fulfilling the need for ultimate cleansing and spiritual nourishment.

Copy as

Commentary on Ezekiel 4 verses 9–17

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

The best exposition of this part of Ezekiel's prediction of Jerusalem's desolation is Jeremiah's lamentation of it, Lam 4:3, Lam 4:4, etc., and Lam 4:10, where he pathetically describes the terrible famine that was in Jerusalem during the siege and the sad effects of it.

I. The prophet here, to affect the people with the foresight of it, must confine himself for 390 days to coarse fare and short commons, and that ill-dressed, for they should want both food and fuel.

1.His meat, for the quality of it, was to be of the worst bread, made of but little wheat and barley, and the rest of beans, and lentiles, and millet, and fitches, such as we feed horses or fatted hogs with, and this mixed, as mill corn, or as that in the beggar's bag, that has a dish full of one sort of corn at one house and of another at another house; of such corn as this must the prophet's bread be made while he underwent the fatigue of lying on his side, and needed something better to support him, Eze 4:9. Note, It is our wisdom not to be too fond of dainties and pleasant bread, because we know not what hard meat we may be tied to, nay, and may be glad of, before we die. The meanest sort of food is better than we deserve, and therefore must not be despised nor wasted, nor must those that use it be looked upon with disdain, because we know not what may be our own lot.

2.For the quantity of it, it was to be of the least that a man could be kept alive with, to signify that the besieged should be reduced to short allowance and should hold out till all the bread in the city was spent, Jer 37:21. The prophet must eat but twenty shekels' weight of bread a day (Eze 4:10), that was about ten ounces; and he must drink but the sixth part of a hin of water, that was half a pint, about eight ounces, Eze 4:11. The stint of the Lessian diet is fourteen ounces of meat and sixteen of drink. The prophet in Babylon had bread enough and to spare, and was by the river side, where there was plenty of water; and yet, that he might confirm his own prediction and be a sign to the children of Israel, God obliges him to live thus sparingly, and he submits to it. Note, God's servants must learn to endure hardness, and to deny themselves the use of lawful delights, when they may thereby serve the glory of God, evidence the sincerity of their faith, and express their sympathy with their brethren in affliction. The body must be kept under and brought into subjection. Nature is content with a little, grace with less, but lust with nothing. It is good to stint ourselves of choice, that we may the better bear it if ever we should come to be stinted by necessity. And in times of public distress and calamity it ill becomes us to make much of ourselves, as those that drank wine in bowls and were not grieved for the affliction of Joseph, Amo 6:4-6.

3.For the dressing of it, he must bake it with a man's dung (Eze 4:12); that must be dried, and serve for fuel to heat his oven with. The thought of it would almost turn one's stomach; yet the coarse bread, thus baked, he must eat as barley-cakes, as freely as if it were the same bread he had been used to. This nauseous piece of cookery he must exercise publicly in their sight, that they might be the more affected with the calamity approaching, which was signified by it, that in the extremity of the famine they should not only have nothing that was dainty, but nothing that was cleanly, about them; they must take up with what they could get. To the hungry soul every bitter thing is sweet. This circumstance of the sign, the baking of his bread with man's dung, the prophet with submission humbly desired might be dispensed with (Eze 4:14); it seemed to have in it something of a ceremonial pollution, for there was a law that man's dung should be covered with earth, that God might see no unclean thing in their camp, Deu 23:13, Deu 23:14. And must he go and gather a thing so offensive, and use it in the dressing of his meat in the sight of the people? "Ah! Lord God," says he, "behold, my soul has not been polluted, and I am afraid lest by this it be polluted." Note, The pollution of the soul by sin is what good people dread more than any thing; and yet sometimes tender consciences fear it without cause, and perplex themselves with scruples about lawful things, as the prophet here, who had not yet learned that it is not that which goes into the mouth that defiles the man, Mat 15:11. But observe he does not plead, "Lord, from my youth I have been brought up delicately and have never been used to any thing but what was clean and nice" (and there were those who were so brought up, who in the siege of Jerusalem did embrace dunghills, Lam 4:5), but that he had been brought up conscientiously, and had never eaten any thing that was forbidden by the law, that died of itself or was torn in pieces; and therefore, "Lord, do not put this upon me now." Thus Peter pleaded (Act 10:14), Lord, I have never eaten any thing that is common or unclean. Note, it will be comfortable to us, when we are reduced to hardships, if our hearts can witness for us that we have always been careful to abstain from sin, even from little sins, and the appearances of evil. Whatever God commands us, we may be sure, is good; but, if we be put upon any thing that we apprehend to be evil, we should argue against it, from this consideration, that hitherto we have preserved our purity - and shall we lose it now? Now, because Ezekiel with a manifest tenderness of conscience made this scruple, God dispensed with him in this matter. Note, Those who have power in their hands should not be rigorous in pressing their commands upon those that are dissatisfied concerning them, yea, though their dissatisfactions be groundless or arising from education and long usage, but should recede from them rather than grieve or offend the weak, or put a stumbling-block before them, in conformity to the example of God's condescension to Ezekiel, though we are sure his authority is incontestable and all his commands are wise and good. God allowed Ezekiel to use cow's dung instead of man's dung, Eze 4:15. This is a tacit reflection upon man, as intimating that he being polluted with sin his filthiness is more nauseous and odious than that of any other creature. How much more abominable and filthy is man! Job 15:16.

II. Now this sign is particularly explained here; it signified,

1.That those who remained in Jerusalem should be brought to extreme misery for want of necessary food. All supplies being cut off by the besiegers, the city would soon find the want of the country, for the king himself is served of the field; and thus the staff of bread would be broken in Jerusalem, Eze 4:16. God would not only take away from the bread its power to nourish, so that they should eat and not be satisfied (Lev 26:26), but would take away the bread itself (Isa 3:1), so that what little remained should be eaten by weight, so much a day, so much a head, that they might have an equal share and might make it last as long as possible. But to what purpose, when they could not make it last always, and the besieged must be tired out before the besiegers? They should eat and drink with care, to make it go as far as might be, and with astonishment, when they saw it almost spent and knew not which way to look for a recruit. They should be astonished one with another; whereas it is ordinarily some alleviation of a calamity to have others share with us in it (Solamen miseris socios habuisse doloris), and some ease to the spirit to complain of the burden, it should be an aggravation of the misery that it was universal, and their complaining to one another should but make them all the more uneasy and increase the astonishment. And the event shall be as bad as their fears; they cannot make it worse than it is, for they shall consume away for their iniquity; multitudes of them shall die of famine, a lingering death, worse than that by the sword (Lam 4:9); they shall dies so as to feel themselves die. And it is sin that brings all this misery upon them: They shall consume away in their iniquity (so it may be read); they shall continue hardened and impenitent, and shall die in their sins, which is more miserable than to die on a dunghill. Now, (1.) Let us see here what woeful work sin makes with a people, and acknowledge the righteousness of God herein. Time was when Jerusalem was filled with the finest of the wheat (Psa 147:14); but now it would be glad of the coarsest, and cannot have it. Fulness of bread, as it was one of Jerusalem's mercies, so it had become one of her sins, Eze 16:49. The plenty was abused to luxury and excess, which were therefore thus justly punished with famine. It is a righteous thing with God to deprive us of those enjoyments which we have made the food and fuel of our lusts. (2.) Let us see what reason we have to bless God for plenty, not only for the fruits of the earth, but for the freedom of commerce, that the husbandman can have money for his bread and the tradesman bread for his money, that there is abundance not only in the field, but in the market, that those who live in cities and great towns, though they sow not, neither do they reap, are yet fed from day to day with food convenient.

2.It signified that those who were carried into captivity should be forced to eat their defiled bread among the Gentiles (Eze 4:13), to eat meat made up by Gentile hands otherwise than according to the law of the Jewish church, which they were always taught to call defiled, and which they would have as great an aversion to as a man would have to bread prepared with dung, that is (as perhaps it may be understood) kneaded and moulded with dung. Daniel and his fellows confined themselves to pulse and water, rather than they would eat the portion of the king's meat assigned them, because they apprehended it would defile them, Dan 1:8. Or they should be forced to eat putrid meat, such as their oppressors would allow them in their slavery, and such as formerly they would have scorned to touch. Because they served not God with cheerfulness in the abundance of all things, God will make them serve their enemies in the want of all things.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 9–17. Public domain.
Copy as
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Ezekiel
(Vrs. 9 ff.) And you will take for yourself wheat, and barley, and beans, and lentils, and millet, and spelt; and you will put them into one vessel, and you will make for yourself breads according to the number of days on which you will sleep on your side: three hundred and ninety days you will eat it. But your food that you will eat will be in the weight of twenty shekels a day: from time to time you will eat it. And you will drink water by measure, the sixth part of a hin; from time to time you will drink it. And you shall eat it as barely bread, and cover it with human excrement in their sight. What vice we have interpreted as, which in Hebrew is called Chasamim (): The Seventy and Theodotion placed ὄλυραν, which some interpret as oats, others as millet. But the first edition of Aquila and Symmachus interpreted it as ζέας, or ζείας: which we call either far or spelt in the native language of Italy and Pannonia. They also added pottery to the vase, but the prophet orders a future famine and demonstrates the shortage of the people of Israel. Just as in a scarcity of all things, different types of food and delicacies are not sought after; but rather how the stomach can be filled: thus the prophet now puts wheat, barley, beans, lentils, millet, and oats into one vessel, and makes three hundred and ninety loaves of bread, which will be eaten each day: these loaves weigh twenty sicles, that is, staters. However, a siclus, that is, a stater, has four drachmas. And eight drachmas make one Latin ounce: so that one loaf of bread is said to have ten ounces, by which the soul is more drawn than sustained. The sterility of food is increased by the sterility of water. For it is commanded to drink the sixth part of the Hebrew measure, which is called hin, each day. Furthermore, two chœnixes Attic make one hin: which we can call two Italian sextarii, so that the hin is the measure of the Jewish sextarius and our military, the sixth part of which makes a third part of the Italian sextarius. Food and drink, according to the famous Speaker, not only give strength but also prevent death. What he says, 'From time to time you will eat or drink,' means from evening to evening, although some may mistakenly understand it as from year to year. And these loaves are made like barley bread made with ashes. And it is said to him, that he cover them with human dung, not for those who will eat them (ignorance is accustomed to temper miseries) but for those who see, and in their eyes, to experience horror before enduring nausea. It is also to be noted that, according to the number of days of the left side, three hundred and ninety sub-cinereous loaves are to be made and eaten each day, and there is to be no mention at all of the forty loaves of the right side; so that the holy Scripture may secretly hint that the punishment of the people who have sinned is not the same if they have knowledge of God and of him who has completely departed from the true religion. Furthermore, we can also say, according to spiritual understanding, that the Jewish people, after offending God, still eat sub-cinereous loaves mixed with wheat, barley, beans, lentils, millet, and oats; of which one is the food of men and the other is the food of animals. For in that which they appear to believe in one God, they have something of grain. But what they deny the Son, they are sustained by the barley of animals and beans, by which the stomach of those who eat is inflated, and the mind is said to be oppressed: so much so that even to Pythagoreans, the food is detestable. Because of lentils, Esau lost his birthright (Gen. 25). Millet is the food of peasants, and of wild animals, and of birds. Oats, or vetches and alsike clover, are the food of dumb animals. But what is written, according to the Septuagint, that Elijah fleeing from Jezebel found bread ὀλυρίτην, made of ashes (3 Kings 19), is a sign of persecution and scarcity. Therefore, he is also fed by the ravens, so that because he did not find food in Israel, he would be nourished by unclean foods from the nations. The law itself, which they read but do not understand, is bread made of ashes and covered with human excrement. Therefore, the apostle Paul also says that he considered the gains of the Law and the observance of the former ceremonies as dung, in order to gain Christ (Philippians 3).
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Ezekiel 4:12 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.