Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Wherefore I gave them also statutes that were not good, and judgments whereby they should not live;
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Wherefore I gave H5414 them also statutes H2706 that were not good H2896, and judgments H4941 whereby they should not live H2421;
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
I also gave them laws which did them no good and rulings by which they did not live;
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
I also gave them over to statutes that were not good and ordinances by which they could not live.
Ask
American Standard Version
Moreover also I gave them statutes that were not good, and ordinances wherein they should not live;
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Moreover also I gave them statutes that were not good, and ordinances in which they should not live;
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Wherefore I gaue them also statutes that were not good, and iudgements, wherein they should not liue.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And I also, I have given to them statutes not good, And judgments by which they do not live.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Ezekiel 20:25 presents a challenging yet crucial aspect of divine judgment, declaring that God "gave them also statutes [that were] not good, and judgments whereby they should not live." This profound statement is not to be misconstrued as God literally legislating evil laws, but rather as a judicial act of divine abandonment. It signifies God's sovereign decision to withdraw His restraining grace, allowing Israel, in their persistent rebellion and rejection of His truly good and life-giving commandments, to experience the destructive, death-dealing consequences of their chosen paths of idolatry and disobedience. The verse powerfully underscores the severe outcomes when a people turn from the source of life to embrace practices antithetical to true well-being.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Ezekiel chapter 20 initiates with a delegation of Israelite elders approaching the prophet, ostensibly to inquire of the Lord. However, God, through Ezekiel, vehemently refuses to be consulted by them due to their deep-seated idolatry and unfaithfulness, which is detailed throughout the chapter. Instead of an oracle, the chapter unfolds as a comprehensive historical indictment, meticulously recounting Israel's unbroken pattern of rebellion against God, from their time in Egypt, through the wilderness wanderings, and into the Promised Land. God highlights their defilement of His Sabbaths, their rejection of His righteous ordinances, and their embrace of abhorrent pagan practices, including child sacrifice. Verse 25 is strategically placed within God's explanation of His escalating judgments against His people, particularly after their repeated spurning of His truly good and life-giving laws. It functions as a climactic declaration of judicial abandonment, setting the stage for further pronouncements of judgment and, ultimately, a future restoration driven by God's own name and glory, not Israel's merit.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The prophet Ezekiel delivers this message to the Jewish exiles in Babylon during the early 6th century BCE, a period of profound national trauma following the destruction of Jerusalem and its temple. The elders' inquiry reflects a persistent, though often superficial, religiosity among the exiles, who continued to seek divine favor despite their unrepentant hearts. Culturally, ancient Near Eastern societies, including Israel, understood divine judgment to involve both direct intervention and the allowing of natural consequences for covenant breaking. The concept of a deity "giving over" or "abandoning" a people as a form of judgment was a recognized theological motif, where a god might withdraw protection or allow a people to fall prey to the destructive outcomes of their own choices or the influence of malevolent forces. The "statutes not good" would have resonated with the horrific pagan practices Israel adopted, such as the abomination of child sacrifice (explicitly mentioned in Ezekiel 20:26), which were utterly abhorrent to Yahweh and antithetical to the very essence of life and societal flourishing.
  • Key Themes: This verse contributes significantly to several overarching themes in Ezekiel and the broader prophetic literature. Foremost is the theme of Divine Judgment as a righteous and inevitable response to persistent rebellion and idolatry. It underscores God's unwavering holiness and His commitment to His covenant, even when His people are unfaithful. Another key theme is Israel's Persistent Rebellion and Idolatry, highlighting their unbroken cycle of turning away from God's life-giving ways, a pattern detailed throughout the chapter. This leads directly to the theme of the Consequences of Disobedience, demonstrating that rejection of God's good laws inevitably leads to destructive outcomes, often self-inflicted. The paradox of God "giving" laws that are "not good" emphasizes His sovereignty even in judgment, allowing people to reap what they sow, a principle articulated in Galatians 6:7. This divine "giving over" is a severe form of judgment, underscoring the gravity of rejecting God's perfect will, which is always intended for life and blessing, as reiterated throughout the Torah (e.g., Deuteronomy 30:19).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • gave (Hebrew, nâthan', H5414): This primitive root is highly versatile, meaning "to give," but used with a wide latitude of application including to "put," "make," "appoint," or "permit." In Ezekiel 20:25, its usage is crucial. It does not imply God literally legislated evil laws. Instead, in the context of divine judgment, nâthan here signifies a judicial act of "giving over" or "permitting" Israel to be subjected to the consequences of their own choices, or to be enslaved by the very practices they had adopted in rejection of God's true laws. It reflects God's active sovereignty in allowing the natural, destructive outcomes of sin to unfold.
  • statutes (Hebrew, chôq', H2706): Derived from a root meaning "to engrave" or "to enact," chôq refers to an enactment, ordinance, decree, or law. It encompasses both divine and human laws, customs, or appointed measures. In this verse, the phrase "statutes [that were] not good" creates a stark paradox with the usual understanding of God's chôq, which are consistently presented as perfect, righteous, and life-giving (e.g., Psalm 19:7-11). The phrase therefore highlights the perversion of what should be life-giving ordinances into something destructive, not by God's direct legislation of evil, but by His judicial permission of Israel's self-chosen path.
  • good (Hebrew, ṭôwb', H2896): This adjective signifies "good" in the widest sense, encompassing beauty, favor, pleasantness, prosperity, and moral righteousness. It describes anything that is beneficial, desirable, or excellent. When paired with the negation "not good" in Ezekiel 20:25, it emphasizes the antithetical nature of the "statutes" and "judgments" in question to God's true character and His original intention for humanity. God's true laws are inherently ṭôwb (good), designed for human flourishing and life. The "not good" statutes are thus those that lead to the opposite: decay, death, and spiritual ruin, contrasting sharply with God's perfect will.
  • live (Hebrew, châyâh', H2421): A primitive root meaning "to live," whether literally or figuratively, and causatively "to revive" or "keep alive." It denotes vitality, flourishing, and spiritual well-being. The phrase "whereby they should not live" is the ultimate indictment of the "statutes not good." God's original laws were given precisely "that they might live" (e.g., Leviticus 18:5). The contrast here is profound: by rejecting God's life-giving ways, Israel embraced practices that led to spiritual death, societal decay, and ultimately, national destruction.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Wherefore I gave them also statutes [that were] not good,": This clause immediately presents a profound theological challenge. The "I gave" (from nâthan) points to God's active role, but the nature of the "statutes" being "not good" (from chôq and ṭôwb with negation) is paradoxical. This is best understood as a divine judicial act of abandonment or a "giving over." Having repeatedly rejected God's truly good and life-giving laws, Israel was allowed by God to become enslaved to the destructive practices of the pagan nations they chose to emulate. These practices, such as child sacrifice (mentioned in the very next verse, Ezekiel 20:26), were indeed "not good" in any sense—morally abhorrent, spiritually defiling, and physically destructive. God's "giving" here is a consequence, a judgment where He permits their self-chosen path to lead to its inevitable bitter fruit.
  • "and judgments whereby they should not live;": This parallel clause reinforces the first, emphasizing the fatal outcome of these "not good" statutes. The "judgments" (from mishpâṭ) refer to verdicts, decrees, or ordinances, often associated with justice and law. The phrase "whereby they should not live" (from châyâh with negation) directly contrasts with God's original intention for His laws, which were given precisely so that His people "might live" (e.g., Deuteronomy 4:1). This underscores the severity of the judgment: by turning from God's path of life, they embraced a path of death. It's a powerful statement of the spiritual and physical decay that results from persistent rebellion against divine truth.

Literary Devices

Ezekiel 20:25 masterfully employs several literary devices to convey its stark message. The most prominent is Irony and Paradox. God, who is the source of all goodness and life, and who gave Israel perfect, life-giving laws, is here depicted as "giving" laws that are "not good" and lead to death. This is a profound paradox that forces the reader to grapple with the nature of divine judgment. It is not that God literally legislated evil, but that in His righteous judgment, He allowed Israel to experience the destructive consequences of their own choices, making their self-chosen paths effectively their "statutes" and "judgments." Closely related is Antithesis, as the verse stands in direct opposition to the numerous passages in the Torah that declare God's laws to be good, righteous, and leading to life (e.g., Deuteronomy 6:24). The contrast between God's true, life-giving laws and the "not good", death-bringing "statutes" is stark and intentional, highlighting the tragic outcome of Israel's rebellion. Furthermore, there is an element of Hyperbole in the phrasing, emphasizing the extreme nature of Israel's spiritual decline and the severity of God's response.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Ezekiel 20:25 delves into the profound theological concept of divine abandonment as a form of judgment. It clarifies that God's "giving" of "not good" statutes is not a legislative act of evil, but a judicial act of "giving over" or allowing. When humanity persistently rejects God's perfect and life-giving will, God, in His righteous sovereignty, may withdraw His restraining grace, allowing individuals or nations to become enslaved by their own sinful desires and the natural, destructive consequences that inevitably follow. This highlights the gravity of human rebellion and the unwavering holiness of God, who will not indefinitely tolerate sin. It reveals that the ultimate "not good" statutes are those that humanity devises for itself when it turns away from the divine source of truth and life, leading to spiritual death and societal decay.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Ezekiel 20:25 serves as a solemn and enduring warning across all generations. It powerfully illustrates that persistent rejection of God's revealed truth and His life-giving commands leads to severe consequences. When individuals, communities, or nations refuse to walk in the light of God's good statutes, they risk being "given over" to the destructive paths of their own choosing, experiencing the bitter fruit of "statutes not good" and "judgments whereby they should not live." This is a call to profound introspection, urging us to examine whether our own lives or societal trends reflect a subtle or overt turning away from God's perfect will. True freedom and abundant life are found not in autonomy from God, but in joyful and humble obedience to His good and perfect design for humanity.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of my life or our society might we be operating under "statutes not good" because we have rejected God's truly good and life-giving principles?
  • How does understanding God's righteous judgment in Ezekiel 20:25 deepen my appreciation for the goodness and wisdom of His commands?
  • What steps can I take to more fully embrace God's statutes and judgments as the pathway to true life and flourishing?

FAQ

Does Ezekiel 20:25 mean God literally gave Israel evil laws?

Answer: No, Ezekiel 20:25 does not mean God literally gave Israel evil or harmful laws. God's laws, as revealed in the Torah, are consistently described as good, righteous, and perfect, intended for Israel's blessing and life (e.g., Deuteronomy 4:8). The phrase "statutes [that were] not good, and judgments whereby they should not live" is a rhetorical and theological statement signifying a severe form of divine judgment. It implies that because Israel repeatedly rejected God's truly good laws, He "gave them over" or permitted them to fall into the destructive practices and consequences of their own choosing, or the pagan rituals they adopted (like child sacrifice, mentioned in Ezekiel 20:26). This "giving over" is a judicial act, allowing them to experience the natural, death-dealing outcomes of their sin, which were indeed "not good" and antithetical to life.

How does this verse reconcile with God's character as a good and loving God?

Answer: This verse, while challenging, reconciles with God's character by highlighting His unwavering holiness and justice. God is indeed good and loving, and His ultimate desire is for His people to choose life and flourish (as seen in Ezekiel 33:11). However, His goodness also entails justice. When His love and repeated calls to repentance are persistently rejected, and His good laws are spurned for idolatry and rebellion, His justice demands a response. The "giving over" described in Ezekiel 20:25 is a severe, yet righteous, act of judgment. It demonstrates the gravity of sin and the profound consequences of rejecting divine truth. It underscores that God will not indefinitely coerce obedience; He respects human freedom to choose, even if that choice leads to self-destruction, and in His sovereignty, He allows the natural consequences to unfold. This act, therefore, upholds His righteousness and demonstrates the seriousness of covenant faithfulness.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Ezekiel 20:25, with its stark portrayal of "statutes not good" and judgments leading to death, finds its profound Christ-centered fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. Humanity, like ancient Israel, continually chooses "statutes not good"—our own self-devised ways of living apart from God, which inevitably lead to spiritual death and decay. The Old Covenant, though good and holy in itself, could not give life because of humanity's inability to perfectly keep it, being "weakened by the flesh" (as seen in Romans 8:3). Jesus, however, is the embodiment of God's truly good and life-giving statutes. He perfectly fulfilled the righteous requirements of God's law, not only living a life of perfect obedience but also bearing the judgment for humanity's rejection of God's good ways. On the cross, Christ became the ultimate "judgment whereby we should not live" (in the sense of bearing the curse of the law, Galatians 3:13), so that those who believe in Him might receive the "statutes that are good" and truly "live" through the power of the Holy Spirit. Through the New Covenant in His blood, God's law is no longer an external burden leading to judgment, but is written on our hearts (as prophesied in Jeremiah 31:33) by the Spirit, enabling us to walk in obedience and experience the abundant life that God always intended (as promised in John 10:10). Thus, Jesus redeems us from the "not good" consequences of sin and offers the true path to eternal life and flourishing.

Copy as

Commentary on Ezekiel 20 verses 10–26

The history of the struggle between the sins of Israel, by which they endeavoured to ruin themselves, and the mercies of God, by which he endeavoured to save them and make them happy, is here continued: and the instances of that struggle in these verses have reference to what passed between God and them in the wilderness, in which God honoured himself and they shamed themselves. The story of Israel in the wilderness is referred to in the New Testament (1 Co. 10 and Heb. 3), as well as often in the Old, for warning to us Christians; and therefore we are particularly concerned in these verses. Observe,

I. The great things God did for them, which he puts them in mind of, not as grudging them his favours, but to show how ungrateful they had been. And we say, If you call a man ungrateful, you can call him no worse. It was a great favour, 1. That God brought them forth out of Egypt (Eze 20:10), though, as it follows, he brought them into the wilderness and not into Canaan immediately. It is better to be at liberty in a wilderness than bond-slaves in a land of plenty, to enjoy God and ourselves in solitude than to lose both in a crowd; yet there were many of them who had such base servile spirits as not to understand this, but, when they met with the difficulties of a desert, wished themselves in Egypt again. 2. That he gave them the law upon Mount Sinai (Eze 20:11), not only instructed them concerning good and evil, but by his authority bound them from the evil and to the good. He gave them his statutes, and a valuable gift it was. Moses commanded them a law that was the inheritance of the congregation of Israel, Deu 33:4. God made them to know his judgments, not only enacted laws for them, but showed them the reasonableness and equity of those laws, with what judgment they were formed. The laws he gave them they were encouraged to observe and obey; for, if a man do them, he shall even live in them; in keeping God's commandments there is abundance of comfort and a great reward. Christ says, If thou wilt into enter life, and enjoy it, keep the commandments. Though those who are the most strict in their obedience are thus far unprofitable servants that they do no more than is their duty to do, yet it is thus richly recompensed: This do, and thou shalt live. The Chaldee says, He shall live an eternal life in them. St. Paul quotes this (Gal 3:12) to show that the law is not of faith, but proposes life upon condition of perfect obedience, which we are not capable of rendering, and therefore must have recourse to the grace of the gospel, without which we are all undone. 3. That he revived the ancient institution of the sabbath day, which was lost and forgotten while they were bond-slaves in Egypt; for their task-masters there would by no means allow them to rest one day in seven. In the wilderness indeed every day was a day of rest; for what need had those to labour who lived upon manna, and whose raiment waxed not old? But one day in seven must be a holy rest (Eze 20:12): I gave them my sabbaths to be a sign between me and them (the institution of the sabbath was a sign of God's good-will to them, and their observance of it a sign of their regard to him), that they might know that I am the Lord that sanctify them. By this God made it to appear that he had distinguished them from the rest of the world, and designed to model them for a peculiar people to himself; and by their attendance on God in solemn assemblies on sabbath days they were made to increase in the knowledge of God, in an experimental knowledge of the powers and pleasures of his sanctifying grace. Note, (1.) Sabbaths are privileges, and are so to be accounted; the church acknowledges as a great favour, in that chapter which is parallel to this and seems to have a reference to this (Neh 9:14), Thou madest known unto them thy holy sabbaths. (2.) Sabbaths are signs; it is a sign that men have a sense of religion, and that there is some good correspondence between them and God, when they make conscience of keeping holy and sabbath day. (3.) Sabbaths, if duly sanctified, are the means of our sanctification; if we do the duty of the day, we shall find, to our comfort, it is the Lord that sanctifies us, makes us holy (that is, truly happy) here, and prepares us to be happy (that is, perfectly holy) hereafter.

II. Their disobedient undutiful conduct towards God, for which he might justly have thrown them out of covenant as soon as he had taken them into covenant (Eze 20:13): They rebelled in the wilderness. There where they received so much mercy from God, and had such a dependence upon him, and were in their way to Canaan, yet there they broke out in many open rebellions against the God that led them and fed them. They did not only not walk in God's statutes, but they despised his judgments as not worth observing; instead of sanctifying the sabbaths, they polluted them, greatly polluted them; one gathered sticks, many went out to gather manna on this day. Hereupon God was ready sometimes to cut them off; he said, more than once, that he would consume them in the wilderness. But Moses interceded, so did God's own mercy more powerfully, and most of all a concern for his own glory, that his name might not be polluted and profaned among the heathen (Eze 20:14), that the Egyptians might not say that for mischief he brought them thus far, or that he was not able to bring them any further, or that he had no such good land as was talked of to bring them to, Exo 32:12; Num 14:13, etc. Note, God's strongest reasons for his sparing mercy are those which are fetched from his own glory.

III. God's determination to cut off that generation of them in the wilderness. He who lifted up his hand for them (Eze 20:6) now lifted up his hand against them; he who by an oath confirmed his promise to bring them out of Egypt now by an oath confirmed his threatenings that he would not bring them into Canaan (Eze 20:15, Eze 20:16): I lifted up my hand unto them, saying, As truly as I live, these men who have tempted me these ten times shall never see the land which I swore unto their fathers, Num 14:22, Num 14:23; Psa 95:11. By their contempt of God's laws, and particularly of his sabbaths, they put a bar in their own door; and that which was at the bottom of their disobedience to God, and their neglect of his institutions, was a secret affection to the gods of Egypt: Their heart went after their idols. Note, The bias of the mind towards the world and the flesh, the money and the belly (those two great objects of spiritual idolatry), is the root of bitterness from which springs all disobedience to the divine law. The heart that goes after those idols despises God's judgments.

IV. The reservation of a seed that should be admitted upon a new trial, and the instructions given to that seed, Eze 20:17. Though they thus deserved ruin, and were doomed to it, yet my eye spared them. When he looked upon them he had compassion on them, and did not make an end of them, but reprieved them till a new generation was reared. Note, It is owing purely to the mercy of God that he has not long ago made an end of us. This new generation is well educated. Moses in Deuteronomy reported and enforce the laws which had been given to those that came out of Egypt, that their children might have them as it were sounding in their ears afresh when they entered Canaan (Eze 20:18): "I said unto their children in the wilderness, in the plains of Moab, Walk in the statutes of your God and walk not in the statutes of your fathers; do not imitate their superstitious usages nor retain their foolish wicked customs; away with their vain conversation, which has nothing else to say for itself but that it was received by the tradition of your fathers, Pe1 1:18. Defile not yourselves with their idols, for you see how odious they rendered themselves to God by them. But keep my judgments and hallow my sabbaths," Eze 20:19, Eze 20:20. Note, If parents be careless, and do not give their children good instructions as they ought, the children ought to make up the want by studying the word of God so much the more carefully and diligently themselves when they grow up; and the bad examples of parents must be made use of by their children for admonition, and not for imitation.

V. The revolt of the next generation from God, by which they also made themselves obnoxious to the wrath of God (Eze 20:21): The children rebelled against me too. And the same that was said of the fathers' rebellion is here said of the children's, for they were a seed of evil-doers. Moses told them that he knew their rebellion and their stiff neck, Deu 31:27. And Deu 9:24, You have been rebellious against the Lord from the day that I knew you. They walked not in my statutes (Eze 20:21); nay, they despised my statutes, Eze 20:24. Those who disobey God's statutes despise them, they show that they have a mean opinion of them and of him whose statutes they are. They polluted God's sabbaths, as their fathers. Note, The profanation of the sabbath day is an inlet to all impiety; those who pollute holy time will keep nothing pure. It was said of the fathers (Eze 20:16) that their heart went after their idols; they worshipped idols because they had an affection for them. It is said of the children (Eze 20:24) that their eyes went after their fathers' idols; they had grown atheistical, and had no affection for any gods at all, but they worshipped their fathers' idols because they were their fathers' and they had them before their eyes. They were used to them; and, if they must have gods, they would have such as they could see, such as they could manage. And that which aggravated their disobedience to God's statutes was that, if they had done them, they might have lived in them (Eze 20:21), might have been a happy thriving people. Note, Those that go contrary to their duty go contrary to their interest; they will not obey, will not come to Christ, that they may have life, Joh 5:40. And it is therefore just that those who will not live and flourish as they might in their obedience should die and perish in their disobedience. Now the great instance of that generation's rebellion and inclination to idolatry was the iniquity of Peor, as that of their fathers was the golden calf. Then the anger of the Lord was kindled against Israel, Num 25:3. Then there was a plague in the congregation of the Lord, which, if it had not been seasonably stayed by Phinehas's zeal, had cut them all off; and yet they owned, in Joshua's time, We ware not cleansed from that iniquity unto this day, Jos 22:17; Psa 106:29. Then it was that God said he would pour out his fury upon them (Eze 20:21), that he lifted up his hand unto them in the wilderness, when they were a second time just ready to enter Canaan, that he would scatter them among the heathen. This very thing he said to them by Moses in his parting song, Deu 32:20. Because they provoked him to jealousy with strange gods, he said, I will hide my face form them; and (Eze 20:26, Eze 20:27) he said, I would scatter them into corners, were it not that I feared the wrath of the enemy, which explains this (Eze 20:21, Eze 20:22), I said I would pour out my fury upon them, but I withdrew my hand for my name's sake. Note, When the corruptions of the visible church are such, and so provoking, that we have reason to fear its total extirpation, yet then we may be confident of this, to our comfort, that God will secure his own honour, by making good his purpose, that while the world stands he will have a church in it.

VI. The judgments of God upon them for their rebellion. They would not regard the statutes and judgments by which God prescribed them their duty, but despised them, and therefore God gave them statutes and judgments which were not good, and by which they should not live, Eze 20:25. By this we may understand the several ways by which God punished them while they were in the wilderness - the plague that broke in upon them, the fiery serpent, and the like - which, in allusion to the law they had broken, are called judgments, because inflicted by the justice of God, and statutes, because he gave orders concerning them and commanded desolations as sometimes he had commanded deliverances, and appointed Israel's plagues as he had done the plagues of Egypt. When God said, I will consume them in a moment (Num 16:21), when he said, Take the heads of the people and hang them up (Num 25:4), when he threatened them with the curse and obliged them to say Amen to every curse (Deu 27:26), then he gave them judgments by which they should not live. More is implied than is expressed; they are judgments by which they should die. Those that will not be bound by the precepts of the law shall be bound by the sentence of it; for one way or other the word of God will take hold of men, Zac 1:6. Spiritual judgments are the most dreadful; and these God punished them with. The statutes and judgments which the heathen observed in the worship of their idols were not good, and in practising them they could not live; and God gave them up to those. He made their sin to be their punishment, gave them up to a reprobate mind, as he did the Gentile idolaters (Rom 1:24, Rom 1:26), gave them up to their own heart's lusts (Psa 81:12), punished them for those superstitious customs which were against the written law by giving them up to those which were against the very light and law of nature; he left them to themselves to be guilty of the most impure idolatries, as in the worship of Baal-peor (he polluted them, that is, her permitted them to pollute themselves, in their own gifts, Eze 20:26), and of the most barbarous idolatries, as in the worship of Moloch, when they caused their children, especially their first-born, which God challenged a particular property in (the first-born of thy sons shalt thou give unto me), to pass through the fire, to be sacrificed to their idols; that thus he might make them desolate, not only that he might justly do it, but that he might do it by their own hands; for this must needs be a great weakening to their families and a diminution of the honour and strength of their country. Note, God sometimes makes sin to be its own punishment, and yet is not the author of sin; and there needs no more to make men miserable than to give them up to their own vile appetites and passions. Let them be put into the hand of their own counsels, and they will ruin themselves and make themselves desolate. And thus God makes them know that he is the Lord, and that he is a righteous God, which they themselves will be compelled to own when they see how much their wilful transgressions contribute to their own desolations. Note, Those who will not acknowledge God as the Lord their ruler shall be made to acknowledge him as the Lord their judge when it is too late.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 10–26. Public domain.
Copy as
Origen of AlexandriaAD 253
HOMILIES ON EXODUS 7:2
Having forgotten the benefits and marvels performed by God, they set up the head of a calf. For this reason, therefore, precepts are given to them by which they are tested. Hence it is that through the prophet Ezekiel the Lord says to them, “I gave you precepts and ordinances that were not good, by which you will not live.” For when they were tested in the precepts of the Lord, they were not found faithful.
Origen of AlexandriaAD 253
AGAINST CELSUS 7:20
We hold, then, that the law has a twofold sense—the one literal, the other spiritual—as has been shown by some before us. Of the first or literal sense it is said, not by us but by God, speaking in one of the prophets, that “the statutes are not good, and the judgments not good”; whereas, taken in a spiritual sense, the same prophet makes God say that “his statutes are good, and his judgments are good.”
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
Letter 74.2
For a paedagogus, as the word is rendered in the Latin, is the teacher of a boy; and he cannot apply perfect precepts to an imperfect age, because it cannot bear them. Again, the God of the Law says by the Prophet, I gave them also statutes that were not good, that is, not perfect. But the same God has preserved more perfect things for the Gospel, as He says, I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil the Law.
John ChrysostomAD 407
HOMILIES ON 1 CORINTHIANS 7:9
To convince you that these laws contribute not to any virtue but were given to them as a sort of curb, providing them with an occasion of perpetual labor, hear what the prophet says concerning them: “I gave them statutes that were not good.” What does “not good” mean? Statutes that did not contribute greatly toward virtue. Therefore he adds also, “and ordinances whereby they shall not live.”
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Ezekiel
(Ver. 23, 24 onwards) Again, I raised my hand against them in the wilderness, to scatter them among the nations and disperse them in the lands, because they had not performed my judgments, and had rejected my commandments, and had violated my Sabbaths, and their eyes had been after the idols (or thoughts) of their fathers. Therefore, I also gave them statutes that were not good, and judgments in which they would not live, and I defiled them in their offerings (or transgressions), as they offered (or led astray) everything that opens the womb because of their sins (for which the Septuagint translated, to destroy them and what they had overlooked): and they will know that I am the Lord. Where in the Old Testament, against their children, who fell in the wilderness, the Lord lifted up His hand to scatter them among the nations, Scripture does not say; but it is to be believed that this was done in accordance with what is reported here. Or he signifies by this, that after they entered the promised land, they were given over at various times, for many sins, to different nations and kings, and at that time the commandments of the Lord, which were good according to their nature, and the judgments by which believers could live, were made not good for them, since they were in no way able to keep the precepts of the law in captivity, and to do what the divine word commanded. He did not say, 'I gave them evil commandments,' but, 'not good commandments.' For it does not immediately follow that what is not good is evil, as the Apostle teaches, it is good for a man not to touch a woman; but because of incontinence, let each possess his own vessel in sanctification and honor (I Cor. VII). And if he does not do this, it is neither good nor evil. Therefore, God gave them, dispersed among the nations, not good commandments, that is, he allowed them to follow their own thoughts and desires, to do what is not appropriate. And he defiled them in his gifts: just as a Priest separates lepers from the people, and shows that they are defiled; while they offer to idols what they should offer to God. And they pass everything that opens the womb through the fire of Baal, that is, the firstborn; so that after they have deserted God and been handed over to the worship of idols, then they may understand that He is the Lord whom they have provoked to anger by their own fault. Symmachus interpreted this passage more explicitly, treating the future as past. Therefore, I will also give them bad precepts and judgments for which they will not live, and I will defile them because of their gifts, as they consecrate and offer everything that opens the womb, so that I may destroy them, and they will know that I am the Lord. And the meaning is this: because I have seen the sons of the fathers equaling the wickedness of their ancestors and doing the same things for which they offended God, I wanted to divide them into nations and disperse them throughout the whole world, and give them bad precepts and judgments in which they would not live, so that I may defile them with their gifts, for they consecrated everything that opens the womb to idols, and I may destroy them forever, and they will know that I am the Lord. Through which he showed that he had not given them good commandments who dwelt in the wilderness, but to those whom he wanted to scatter among the nations, and to make foreigners in the whole world, he gave them a desire for things that he did not give: so that there they would do good commandments of God, not good because of their own fault, while they exhibited to idols what God had commanded to be exhibited. This can also be said, that before the offense, they received only the Ten Commandments; but after idolatry and blasphemy, they received multiple ceremonies of the law, so that they would offer victims to God rather than to demons, and by comparison with sacrilege, what was not good in itself became lighter, and by no means evil, because it was offered to God, and yet not good, because they offended the author of good.
JeromeAD 420
LETTER 79.10
[Israel] received statutes that were not good and commandments that were altogether evil whereby it should not live but should be punished through them.
Augustine of HippoAD 430
LETTER 82
But, why should I not say that the requirements of ancient ceremonies are not good because people are not justified by them; they are figures that foreshadow the grace, by which we are justified.… They are not bad, because they were precepts of divine origin, adapted to times and people, although in this estimate I am supported by the prophetic statement in which God said that he had given to that people “statutes that were not good.” It happens that he did not say that they were bad but only that they were not good: that is, such that with them, people become good; without them, they do not. I would like your kind sincerity to inform me whether any oriental saint who comes to Rome and fasts on Saturday—except the eve of Easter—is acting deceitfully. If we say that is wrong, we shall condemn the Roman church and also many places near it and others somewhat further away, where the same custom continues to be observed.
John CassianAD 435
CONFERENCE 21:33
Whoever lives under the light of the grace of the gospel and overcomes evil not by resisting it but by bearing it and who does not hesitate of his own free will to give his other cheek to one who strikes his right cheek, who gives his cloak also to one who wants to raise a lawsuit against him for his coat, and who loves his enemies and prays for those who slander him, this man has broken the yoke of sin and burst its chains. For he is not living under the law, which does not destroy the seeds of sin.
John DamasceneAD 749
ON DIVINE IMAGES 2:15
God finds fault with the commandments of the Old Testament, for he says, “I gave them statutes that were not good and ordinances by which they could not have life,” because of their hardness of heart.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Ezekiel 20:25 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.