Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And if he have betrothed her unto his son, he shall deal with her after the manner of daughters.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And if he have betrothed H3259 her unto his son H1121, he shall deal H6213 with her after the manner H4941 of daughters H1323.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
If he has her marry his son, then he is to treat her like a daughter.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
And if he chooses her for his son, he must deal with her as with a daughter.
Ask
American Standard Version
And if he espouse her unto his son, he shall deal with her after the manner of daughters.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
If he marries her to his son, he shall deal with her as a daughter.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
But if he hath betrothed her vnto his sonne, he shall deale with her according to the custome of the daughters.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
`And if to his son he betroth her, according to the right of daughters he doth to her.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
The Kingdom of Egypt in the Time of Moses
The Kingdom of Egypt in the Time of Moses View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 2,087 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Exodus 21:9 presents a crucial provision within the Mosaic Law, detailing the elevated status of a Hebrew maidservant who has been sold by her father, should her master choose to betroth her to his son. This verse mandates that she is to be treated "after the manner of daughters," signifying a profound transformation of her standing from a mere servant to an integrated and cherished member of the household. This legal stipulation underscores God's deep concern for the vulnerable, His commitment to justice, and His compassionate design for human dignity, even within the ancient societal structures of servitude.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Exodus 21:9 is nestled within the "Book of the Covenant" (Exodus 20:22-23:33), a foundational collection of divine laws that immediately follows the giving of the Ten Commandments. This section serves as a practical, case-law application of the broader moral and ethical principles outlined in the Decalogue. Specifically, verses Exodus 21:1-11 address the rights and protections afforded to Hebrew servants, both male and female, presenting a striking contrast to the often harsh and exploitative treatment of servants in other ancient Near Eastern legal codes. Verse 9 directly follows the regulations concerning a father selling his daughter into servitude (Exodus 21:7) and the master's obligations if he does not find her pleasing and does not betroth her to himself (Exodus 21:8). Thus, verse 9 provides the positive and most dignifying outcome when the master chooses to integrate her into his family through betrothal to his son, highlighting the law's protective intent.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In ancient Israel, extreme poverty or debt could compel a father to sell his daughter into temporary servitude, often as a means of survival for the family. Unlike male Hebrew servants who were typically freed after six years (Exodus 21:2), female servants had different provisions, often related to marriage and family integration. Betrothal (Hebrew: 'aras, from yâʻad) in ancient Israel was a legally binding agreement, far more serious than a modern engagement, carrying the weight of marriage though not yet consummated. This legal act granted the betrothed woman significant rights and protections. The phrase "after the manner of daughters" is particularly significant, as it elevates her status from property or a mere laborer to a cherished family member, entitled to sustenance, clothing, and marital rights, as further elaborated in Exodus 21:10. This provision highlights the unique, compassionate, and human-dignifying nature of Mosaic Law compared to other contemporary legal systems, which often lacked such robust safeguards for the vulnerable.
  • Key Themes: This verse contributes significantly to several key themes within Exodus and the broader Pentateuch. It powerfully illustrates God's justice and compassion for the vulnerable, a recurring motif throughout the law, emphasizing that even those in positions of servitude are image-bearers of God and deserve equitable treatment. It also speaks to the theme of covenant community and belonging, demonstrating how the law facilitates the integration of outsiders into the familial and social fabric of Israel, reflecting God's desire for a just and caring society. Furthermore, it underscores the sanctity of marriage and family, elevating the institution of betrothal and ensuring the well-being of women within it. This passage, alongside others like Deuteronomy 15:12-18, showcases the distinct ethical framework of God's law, designed to uphold human dignity and prevent exploitation.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Betrothed (Hebrew, yâʻad', H3259): This verb (H3259) signifies to "fix upon by agreement or appointment," specifically to "engage for marriage." In ancient Israel, betrothal was a formal, legally binding covenant, often requiring a formal agreement and payment (mohar) to the bride's family. It conferred a marital status, making the betrothed woman legally considered a wife, even before cohabitation or consummation. This legal weight is crucial, as it transforms the maidservant's status from a temporary bond of servitude into a permanent, familial one, granting her the rights and protections associated with a wife and daughter-in-law.
  • Manner (Hebrew, mishpâṭ', H4941): Derived from the root meaning "to judge" (H4941), mishpâṭ properly refers to a "verdict pronounced judicially," encompassing "justice," "law," "ordinance," "right," or "custom." In this context, "after the manner" implies according to the established legal standard, custom, or right treatment. It signifies that the master is legally bound to apply the same principles of care, provision, and respect to the betrothed maidservant as would be customary and legally required for a biological daughter within the household, ensuring her full rights and dignity.
  • Daughters (Hebrew, bath', H1323): While the KJV uses the plural "daughters," the root (H1323) is bath, meaning "a daughter." To treat someone "after the manner of daughters" means to extend to them the same care, provision, and dignity as one would to a biological child born into the family. This is a complete redefinition of her social and legal standing, moving her from an outsider and servant to an insider and family member, reflecting a profound commitment to her welfare and integration into the family unit, with all the associated rights and privileges.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And if he have betrothed her unto his son": This clause establishes the specific condition under which the subsequent legal provision applies. It describes the master's deliberate decision to arrange a marriage between the maidservant, initially purchased for servitude, and his own son. This act of betrothal is a formal, legally binding commitment that signifies a profound elevation of her status and her integration into the family structure, moving beyond her initial role as a purchased servant. The master's son would become her husband, and she would become his daughter-in-law, initiating a new familial relationship.
  • "he shall deal with her after the manner of daughters": This is the core mandate of the verse, prescribing the required treatment. It means that once formally betrothed to the son, the maidservant is no longer to be treated as mere property or a temporary servant, but with the same love, respect, provision, and rights as if she were a biological daughter of the master's household. This would include ensuring her sustenance, clothing, and marital rights (as detailed in Exodus 21:10), as well as her general well-being and dignity, reflecting a profound and legally enforced shift in her social and legal standing within the family.

Literary Devices

Exodus 21:9 primarily employs Legal Precedent and Contrast. The verse functions as a Legal Precedent, establishing a specific, compassionate rule for a particular social scenario within the broader Mosaic Law. It sets a clear standard for how vulnerable individuals, once brought into a family through betrothal, must be treated, reflecting God's concern for justice. The most striking literary device is Contrast, which highlights the dramatic shift in status for the maidservant. She moves from being a "servant" (implied from previous verses, e.g., Exodus 21:7) to being treated "after the manner of daughters." This stark juxtaposition emphasizes the compassionate and dignifying nature of God's law, elevating the individual from a position of potential exploitation to one of familial belonging and protection. This also functions as a powerful Metaphor for adoption or integration, where an outsider is brought in and given the full rights and privileges of a natural-born family member, a theme with profound theological implications.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Exodus 21:9 powerfully illustrates God's unwavering commitment to justice, dignity, and the protection of the vulnerable, even within the complex social structures of ancient Israel. It reveals a divine character that values human life and well-being above mere economic transaction or social status. The law's mandate to treat a betrothed maidservant "after the manner of daughters" reflects a profound theological principle: that those who are brought into the covenant community, regardless of their origin or initial status, are to be treated with love, care, and full rights, reflecting God's own compassionate nature and His desire for equitable relationships within His people. This principle transcends the specific context, calling believers to extend radical compassion and ensure justice for all, especially those who are marginalized or dependent, mirroring God's own heart for the oppressed.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While the specific practice of selling daughters into servitude is no longer applicable today, the enduring principles embedded in Exodus 21:9 remain profoundly relevant for believers. This verse calls us to reflect on the inherent dignity of every human being, regardless of their social standing, economic status, or background. It challenges us to actively seek justice and compassion for the vulnerable in our own contexts, whether they are immigrants, the poor, the marginalized, the orphaned, the widowed, or those in positions of dependence. We are reminded of our responsibility to use any position of authority, influence, or resources we possess not for exploitation, but for the upliftment and protection of others. Furthermore, the concept of integrating an outsider "after the manner of daughters" speaks powerfully to the radical inclusivity of the Kingdom of God, urging us to welcome and embrace those who are different, fostering environments where all are treated with respect, love, and the full rights of belonging within the community of faith.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what ways might we, consciously or unconsciously, treat individuals based on their social status or perceived value, rather than their inherent dignity as image-bearers of God?
  • How can we, as individuals and as a community, actively work to protect and advocate for the vulnerable and marginalized in our society today, reflecting God's heart for justice?
  • What does it mean to "deal with others after the manner of daughters" in our contemporary relationships, whether familial, professional, or communal, extending radical welcome and care?

FAQ

Was it common for fathers to sell their daughters into servitude in ancient Israel?

Answer: While the practice is mentioned in the Mosaic Law, it was likely a measure of last resort, primarily driven by extreme poverty or debt, serving as a desperate means of survival for the family. The law itself, as seen in Exodus 21:7-11, sought to regulate and mitigate the harshness of such situations by providing significant protections and pathways to dignity, distinguishing it sharply from more exploitative systems found in other ancient Near Eastern cultures. The Mosaic Law's primary aim was to prevent outright chattel slavery and ensure human dignity, even in difficult circumstances, by establishing rights and limits for both servants and masters.

What is the difference between "betrothed" and "married" in this context?

Answer: In ancient Israel, betrothal ('aras, from yâʻad) was a legally binding agreement that essentially conferred the status of marriage, though the couple had not yet begun living together or consummated the union. It was far more serious and legally weighty than a modern engagement. A betrothed woman was considered a wife, and breaking a betrothal required a formal divorce. Deuteronomy 22:23-24 illustrates the severity, prescribing the same penalty for adultery with a betrothed woman as with a married one. Exodus 21:9 emphasizes that once this formal betrothal to the son occurred, the maidservant's status immediately elevated to that of a family member, with corresponding rights and protections, even before the full marriage ceremony or cohabitation.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Exodus 21:9, with its radical elevation of a maidservant to the status of a beloved daughter, beautifully foreshadows the transformative work of Christ in redeeming humanity. We, who were once "slaves to sin" (Romans 6:6), alienated from God and without rights or inheritance in His household, are through Christ's atoning sacrifice "betrothed" to Him, brought into a new covenant relationship. The New Testament declares that through faith in Jesus, we receive the "Spirit of adoption as sons" (Romans 8:15), signifying that we are no longer servants but are welcomed as "heirs of God and fellow heirs with Christ" (Romans 8:17). Just as the maidservant was treated "after the manner of daughters," so too are believers, regardless of their former status, background, or spiritual destitution, welcomed into God's family with full rights, dignity, and a glorious inheritance, receiving the lavish care and unconditional love due to His beloved children (Galatians 3:26-29). This divine adoption transcends all earthly distinctions, demonstrating God's ultimate compassion and His desire to bring outsiders into His eternal family through the redemptive work of His Son, Jesus Christ, who makes all things new (2 Corinthians 5:17).

Copy as

Commentary on Exodus 21 verses 1–11

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

The first verse is the general title of the laws contained in this and the two following chapters, some of them relating to the religious worship of God, but most of them relating to matters between man and man. Their government being purely a Theocracy, that which in other states is to be settled by human prudence was directed among them by a divine appointment, so that the constitution of their government was peculiarly adapted to make them happy. These laws are called judgments, because they are framed in infinite wisdom and equity, and because their magistrates were to give judgment according to the people. In the doubtful cases that had hitherto occurred, Moses had particularly enquired of God for them, as appeared, Exo 18:15; but now God gave him statutes in general by which to determine particular cases, which likewise he must apply to other like cases that might happen, which, falling under the same reason, fell under the same rule. He begins with the laws concerning servants, commanding mercy and moderation towards them. The Israelites had lately been servants themselves; and now that they had become, not only their own masters, but masters of servants too, lest they should abuse their servants, as they themselves had been abused and ruled with rigour by the Egyptian task-masters, provision was made by these laws for the mild and gentle usage of servants. Note, If those who have had power over us have been injurious to us this will not in the least excuse us if we be in like manner injurious to those who are under our power, but will rather aggravate our crime, because, in that case, we may the more easily put our souls into their soul's stead. Here is,

I. A law concerning men-servants, sold, either by themselves or their parents, through poverty, or by the judges, for their crimes; even those of the latter sort (if Hebrews) were to continue in slavery but seven years at the most, in which time it was taken for granted that they would sufficiently have smarted for their folly or offence. At the seven years' end the servant should either go out free (Exo 21:2, Exo 21:3), or his servitude should thenceforward be his choice, Exo 21:5, Exo 21:6. If he had a wife given him by his master, and children, he might either leave them and go out free himself, or, if he had such a kindness for them that he would rather tarry with them in bondage than go out at liberty without them, he was to have his ear bored through to the doorpost and serve till the death of his master, or the year of jubilee.

1.By this law God taught, (1.) The Hebrew servants generosity, and a noble love of liberty, for they were the Lord's freemen; a mark of disgrace must be put upon him who refused liberty when he might have it, though he refused it upon considerations otherwise laudable enough. Thus Christians, being bought with a price, and called unto liberty, must not be the servants of men, nor of the lusts of men, Co1 7:23. There is a free and princely spirit that much helps to uphold a Christian, Psa 51:12. He likewise taught, (2.) The Hebrew masters not to trample upon their poor servants, knowing, not only that they had been by birth upon a level with them, but that, in a few years, they would be so again. Thus Christian masters must look with respect on believing servants, Plm 1:16.

2.This law will be further useful to us, (1.) To illustrate the right God has to the children of believing parents, as such, and the place they have in his church. They are by baptism enrolled among his servants, because they are born in his house, for they are therefore born unto him, Eze 16:20. David owns himself God's servant, as he was the son of his handmaid (Psa 116:16), and therefore entitled to protection, Psa 86:16. (2.) To explain the obligation which the great Redeemer laid upon himself to prosecute the work of our salvation, for he says (Psa 40:6), My ears hast thou opened, which seems to allude to this law. He loved his Father, and his captive spouse, and the children that were given him, and would not go out free from his undertaking, but engaged to serve in it for ever, Isa 42:1, Isa 42:4. Much more reason have we thus to engage ourselves to serve God for ever; we have all the reason in the world to love our Master and his work, and to have our ears bored to his door-posts, as those who desire not to go out free from his service, but to be found more and more free to it, and in it, Psa 84:10.

Concerning maid-servants, whom their parents, through extreme poverty, had sold, when they were very young, to such as they hoped would marry them when they grew up; if they did not, yet they must not sell them to strangers, but rather study how to make them amends for the disappointment; if they did, they must maintain them handsomely, Exo 21:7-11. Thus did God provide for the comfort and reputation of the daughters of Israel, and has taught husbands to give honour to their wives (be their extraction ever so mean) as to the weaker vessels, Pe1 3:7.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–11. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Exodus 21:9 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.