Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
The ten sons of Haman the son of Hammedatha, the enemy of the Jews, slew they; but on the spoil laid they not their hand.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
The ten H6235 sons H1121 of Haman H2001 the son H1121 of Hammedatha H4099, the enemy H6887 of the Jews H3064, slew H2026 they; but on the spoil H961 laid H7971 they not their hand H3027.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Consolidated into verse 7 by this translation.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
They killed these ten sons of Haman son of Hammedatha, the enemy of the Jews, but they did not lay a hand on the plunder.
Ask
American Standard Version
the ten sons of Haman the son of Hammedatha, the Jews’ enemy, slew they; but on the spoil they laid not their hand.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
the ten sons of Haman the son of Hammedatha, the Jew’s enemy, but they didn’t lay their hand on the plunder.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
The ten sonnes of Haman, ye sonne of Ammedatha, the aduersarie of the Iewes slewe they: but they layd not their hands on the spoyle.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
ten sons of Haman son of Hammedatha, adversary of the Jews, they have slain, and on the prey they have not put forth their hand.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
Susa in the Time of Esther
Susa in the Time of Esther View full PDF
The Persian Empire in the time of Esther
The Persian Empire in the time of Esther View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 12,845 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Esther 9:10 provides a concise yet profoundly significant account of the Jewish people's actions following their authorized self-defense against those who sought their destruction. It specifically details the execution of Haman's ten sons, thereby completing the eradication of their chief adversary's lineage, while simultaneously highlighting a remarkable act of integrity: the Jews' deliberate refusal to take any plunder from their defeated enemies. This verse underscores the divine justice at play and the purity of the Jewish community's motives, distinguishing their defensive victory from typical ancient warfare driven by conquest and material gain.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Esther 9:10 is situated within the climactic events of the book of Esther, specifically following the day of self-defense granted to the Jews by King Ahasuerus's counter-decree. Chapters 8 and 9 detail the reversal of Haman's genocidal plot, culminating in the Jews' victory over their adversaries on the 13th day of Adar. Verse 10 specifically follows the general account of the Jews striking down their enemies (Esther 9:1-6) and precedes Queen Esther's further request for the public hanging of Haman's sons' bodies and an additional day of defense in Susa (Esther 9:13-15). This verse acts as a crucial bridge, emphasizing the thoroughness of the victory against Haman's direct lineage and introducing the unique ethical stance of the Jews regarding plunder, which is reiterated in Esther 9:15 and 9:16.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The events of Esther unfold during the Persian Empire's reign, likely under Xerxes I (Ahasuerus), around the 5th century BCE. In ancient Near Eastern warfare, it was customary and expected for victors to take spoil (plunder, loot, captives) from the vanquished. This practice was a significant component of military success, providing economic benefit and demonstrating dominance. Haman's plot was not merely about political power but aimed at the complete annihilation of the Jewish people, a genocidal intent. The king's decree allowed the Jews to "destroy, slay, and annihilate" those who attacked them and to "plunder their possessions" as detailed in Esther 8:11. Therefore, the Jews' refusal to take spoil, as stated in Esther 9:10, was a deliberate and counter-cultural act, setting them apart from typical military engagements of the time and demonstrating a higher moral purpose.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes in the book of Esther. It exemplifies Divine Justice and Reversal, where the wicked schemes of Haman are turned back upon his own head and family, fulfilling the principle of "measure for measure" as seen in Esther 7:10. The mention of Haman's sons being slain underscores the Completeness of Deliverance, ensuring that the threat from Haman's lineage is entirely neutralized. Most significantly, the refusal to take spoil highlights the theme of Moral Integrity and Pure Motives. Despite being granted permission to plunder by the king's decree, as explicitly stated in Esther 8:11, the Jews chose not to, demonstrating that their actions were driven by self-preservation and justice, not by avarice or personal gain. This ethical stance elevates their victory beyond mere survival to a testament of their character and, implicitly, the character of their God.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Haman (Hebrew, Hâmân', H2001): The antagonist of the book of Esther, described here as "the son of Hammedatha, the enemy of the Jews." His specific identification underscores the personal and familial nature of the retribution. The slaying of his ten sons represents the complete eradication of his lineage, ensuring that his evil seed would not continue to pose a threat. This act is not simply a military victory but a fulfillment of divine justice against the one who sought to annihilate God's people.
  • Spoil (Hebrew, bizzâh', H961): Refers to the plunder, loot, or booty taken from a defeated enemy in warfare. The king's decree explicitly granted the Jews permission to seize the spoil of those who attacked them. The explicit statement that the Jews "laid they not their hand" on it (לֹא־שָׁלְחוּ אֶת־יָדָם בַּבִּזָּה֙) is a powerful negation, highlighting their deliberate choice to forgo material gain. This decision distinguishes their actions as purely defensive and just, rather than opportunistic or greedy, elevating the moral character of their victory.
  • Hand (Hebrew, yâd', H3027): This primitive word, referring to the "open hand," signifies power, means, direction, and even possession. In the phrase "laid they not their hand," it emphasizes the deliberate and active choice of the Jewish people to refrain from taking the spoil. It highlights their agency and principled decision, demonstrating that their refusal was not passive but an intentional act of moral integrity, using their "hand" not for acquisition but for restraint.

Verse Breakdown

  • "The ten sons of Haman the son of Hammedatha, the enemy of the Jews, slew they;": This clause emphasizes the specific targets of the Jewish defense: the direct offspring of Haman, the primary architect of the genocidal plot. The number "ten" signifies a complete unit, indicating the thoroughness of the retribution against Haman's household. The repeated identification of Haman as "the enemy of the Jews" reinforces the justice of their actions, framing the killing of his sons as a direct consequence of his malicious intent against God's chosen people. This act ensures the complete downfall of the family line that threatened their very existence.
  • "but on the spoil laid they not their hand.": This contrasting clause introduces a crucial ethical dimension to the Jewish victory. Despite being legally entitled by the king's decree to take spoil from their enemies, the Jewish people deliberately chose not to. The phrase "laid they not their hand" (לֹא־שָׁלְחוּ אֶת־יָדָם בַּבִּזָּה֙) is a strong negation, signifying a principled and intentional refusal. This decision underscores that their actions were motivated by self-preservation and the pursuit of justice, not by avarice or the desire for material gain. It sets their defensive war apart from typical ancient conflicts, showcasing their integrity and adherence to a higher moral standard.

Literary Devices

The verse employs Contrast as a primary literary device, sharply juxtaposing the violent act of slaying Haman's sons with the disciplined refusal to take spoil. This contrast highlights the purity of the Jewish people's motives, distinguishing their defensive actions from opportunistic warfare. The phrase "the enemy of the Jews" functions as a Labeling device, consistently identifying Haman not just as an individual but as the embodiment of opposition to God's people, thereby justifying the severity of the retribution. Furthermore, the Repetition of the phrase "laid they not their hand on the spoil" (found also in Esther 9:15 and 9:16) serves to emphasize this unique and significant aspect of their victory, reinforcing its importance as a moral statement within the narrative.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Esther 9:10 profoundly illustrates the principle of divine justice, where the wicked's schemes are ultimately turned back upon their own heads. Haman's meticulously planned destruction of the Jews results in the annihilation of his own lineage, demonstrating God's sovereign hand in reversing evil and protecting His people. The Jews' refusal to take spoil, despite explicit permission, is a powerful testament to their integrity and pure motives, underscoring that their victory was for justice and survival, not for material gain. This act distinguishes them as a people set apart, whose actions, even in warfare, reflect a higher ethical standard. It speaks to a deeper trust in God's provision rather than relying on earthly spoils.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Esther 9:10 challenges us to consider the purity of our motives, even when we are in the right or have legitimate opportunities for gain. The Jewish people, granted permission to enrich themselves, chose integrity over avarice, demonstrating that true victory is not measured by material acquisition but by adherence to justice and righteousness. This calls believers to evaluate their own pursuits: are we driven by self-interest, or by a commitment to God's will and the good of others? In a world often driven by greed and accumulation, the refusal to take spoil stands as a powerful counter-cultural example. It reminds us that our actions, even in defense or triumph, should reflect the character of God, prioritizing moral uprightness and selfless purpose over personal enrichment. We are called to pursue justice and defend truth, but always with hearts free from covetousness, trusting that God is our ultimate provider and reward.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of my life am I tempted to pursue personal gain, even when it might compromise my integrity or the purity of my motives?
  • How can I ensure that my actions, even when justified, are driven by a desire for righteousness rather than selfish ambition?
  • What does the Jewish people's refusal to take spoil teach me about trusting God's provision over worldly acquisition?

FAQ

Why were the bodies of Haman's sons hanged after they were slain?

Answer: Esther 9:10 states that Haman's sons were "slew," implying they were killed in battle or executed. However, Esther 9:13-14 clarifies that Queen Esther made a specific request to King Ahasuerus for their bodies to be publicly hanged on the gallows. This act was not part of the initial slaying but a subsequent public display. In ancient Persian culture, public hanging or impalement of executed criminals or enemies was a common practice intended as a severe deterrent and a powerful symbol of disgrace and the king's absolute authority. For Haman's sons, it served as a stark and lasting visual testament to the complete reversal of Haman's plot and the thoroughness of divine justice against the "enemy of the Jews." It ensured that the memory of their defeat and the triumph of the Jewish people would be deeply impressed upon the populace of Susa and beyond.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Esther 9:10, while rooted in historical events, finds profound Christ-centered fulfillment in the ultimate victory of God over spiritual enemies and the nature of His Kingdom. Haman, the "enemy of the Jews," who sought to annihilate God's people, foreshadows Satan, the ultimate adversary who seeks to destroy humanity and thwart God's redemptive plan. Just as Haman's lineage was utterly defeated, so too was the power of sin and death decisively broken through Christ's sacrificial death and resurrection. The cross, seemingly a defeat, was in fact the ultimate triumph where Jesus disarmed the spiritual rulers and authorities, triumphing over them as described in Colossians 2:15. Furthermore, the Jewish people's refusal to take spoil, despite being entitled, points to the selfless nature of Christ's mission and the values of His Kingdom. Unlike earthly conquerors who seek material gain, Christ's victory was not for personal enrichment but for the salvation of humanity, freely giving His life as a ransom, as attested in Mark 10:45. Believers, as heirs of this spiritual victory, are called to live not by the spoils of this world, but by the eternal riches found in Christ, embracing a kingdom "not of this world" as Jesus declared in John 18:36, and living with integrity and selfless devotion, just as their Savior did, exemplified in Philippians 2:5-8.

Copy as

Commentary on Esther 9 verses 1–19

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We have here a decisive battle fought between the Jews and their enemies, in which the Jews were victorious. Neither side was surprised; for both had notice of it long enough before, so that it was a fair trial of skill between them. Nor could either side call the other rebels, for they were both supported by the royal authority.

I. The enemies of the Jews were the aggressors. They hoped, notwithstanding the latter edict, to have power over them, by virtue of the former (Est 9:1), and made assaults upon them accordingly; they formed themselves into bodies, and joined in confederacy against them, to seek their hurt, Est 9:2. The Chaldee paraphrase says that none appeared against the Jews but Amalekites only, who were infatuated, and had their hearts hardened, as Pharaoh's against Israel, to take up arms to their own destruction. Some had such an inveterate implacable malice against the Jews that Haman's fall and Mordecai's advancement, instead of convincing them, did but exasperate them, and make them the more outrageous and resolute to cut all their throats. The sons of Haman, particularly, vowed to avenge their father's death, and pursue his designs, which they call noble and brave, whatever hazards they run; and a strong party they had formed both in Shushan and in the provinces in order hereunto. Fight they would, though they plainly saw Providence fight against them; and thus they were infatuated to their own destruction. If they would have sat still, and attempted nothing against the people of God, not a hair of their head would have fallen to the ground: but they cannot persuade themselves to do that; they must be meddling, though it prove to their own ruin, and roll a burdensome stone, which will return upon them.

II. But the Jews were the conquerors. That very day when the king's decree for their destruction was to be put in execution, and which the enemies thought would have been their day, proved God's day, Psa 37:13. It was turned to the contrary of what was expected, and the Jews had rule over those that hated them, Est 9:1. We are here told,

1.What the Jews did for themselves (Est 9:2): They gathered themselves together in their cities, embodied, and stood upon their defence, offering violence to none, but bidding defiance to all. If they had not had an edict to warrant them, they durst not have done it, but, being so supported, they strove lawfully. Had they acted separately, each family apart, they would have been an easy prey to their enemies; but acting in concert, and gathering together in their cities, they strengthened one another, and durst face their enemies. Vis unita fortior - forces act most powerfully when combined. Those that write of the state of the Jews at this day give this as a reason why, though they are very numerous in many parts, and very rich, they are yet so despicable, because they are generally so selfish that they cannot incorporate, and, being under the curse of dispersion, they cannot unite, nor (as here) gather together, for, if they could, they might with their numbers and wealth threaten the most potent states.

2.What the rulers of the provinces did for them, under the influence of Mordecai. All the officers of the king, who, by the bloody edict, were ordered to help forward their destruction (Est 3:12, Est 3:13), conformed to the latter edict (which, being an estopel against an estopel, had set the matter at large, and left them at liberty to observe which they pleased) and helped the Jews, which turned the scale on their side, Est 9:3. The provinces would generally do as the rulers of the provinces inclined, and therefore their favouring the Jews would greatly further them. But why did they help them? Not because they had any kindness for them, but because the fear of Mordecai fell upon them, he having manifestly the countenance both of God and the king. They all saw it their interest to help Mordecai's friends because he was not only great in the king's house, and caressed by the courtiers (as many are who have no intrinsic worth to support their reputation), but his fame for wisdom and virtue went out thence throughout all the provinces: in all places he was extolled as a great man. He was looked upon also as a thriving man, and one that waxed greater and greater (Est 9:4), and therefore for fear of him all the king's officers helped the Jews. Great men may, by their influence, do a great deal of good; many that fear not God will stand in awe of them.

3.What God did for them: he struck all people with a fear of them (Est 9:2), as the Canaanites were made afraid of Israel (Jos 2:9, Jos 5:1), so that, though they had so much hardiness as to assault them, yet they had not courage to prosecute the assault. Their hearts failed them when they came to engage, and none of the men of might could find their hands.

4.What execution they did hereupon: No man could withstand them (Est 9:2), but they did what they would to those that hated them, Est 9:5. So strangely were the Jews strengthened and animated, and their enemies weakened and dispirited, that none of those who had marked themselves for their destruction escaped, but they smote them with the stroke of the sword. Particularly, (1.) On the thirteenth day of the month Adar they slew in the city Shushan 500 men (Est 9:6) and the ten sons of Haman, Est 9:10. The Jews, when on the feast of Purim they read this book of Esther, oblige themselves to read the names of Haman's ten sons all in one breath, without any pause, because they say that they were all killed together, and all gave up the ghost just in the same moment. - Buxt. Synag. Jud. c. 24. The Chaldee paraphrase says that, when these ten were slain, Zeresh, with seventy more of his children, escaped, and afterwards begged their bread from door to door. (2.) On the fourteenth day they slew in Shushan 300 more, who had escaped the sword on the former day of execution, Est 9:15. This Esther obtained leave of the king for them to do, for the greater terror of their enemies, and the utter crushing of that malignant party of men. The king had taken account of the numbers that were put to the sword the first day (Est 9:11), and told Esther (Est 9:12), and asked her what more she desired. "Nothing," says she, "but commission to do such another day's work." Esther surely was none of the blood-thirsty, none of those that delight in slaughter, but she had some very good reasons that moved her to make this request. She also desired that the dead bodies of Haman's ten sons might be hanged up on the gallows on which their father was hanged, for the greater disgrace of the family and terror of the party (Est 9:13), and it was done accordingly, Est 9:14. It is supposed that they were hanged in chains and left hanging for some time. (3.) The Jews in the country kept to their orders, and slew no more of their enemies than what were slain the thirteenth day, which were in all, among all the provinces, 75,000, Est 9:16. If all these were Amalekites (as the Jews say), surely now it was that the remembrance of Amalek was utterly put out, Exo 17:14. However, that which justifies them in the execution of so many is that they did it in their own just and necessary defence; they stood for their lives, authorized to do so by the law of self-preservation, as well as by the king's decree. (4.) In these several executions it is taken notice of that on the prey they laid not their hand, Est 9:10, Est 9:15, Est 9:16. The king's commission had warranted them to take the spoil of their enemies for a prey (Est 8:11), and a fair opportunity they had of enriching themselves with it; if Haman's party had prevailed, no doubt, they would have made use of their authority to seize the goods and estates of the Jews, Est 3:13. But the Jews would not do so by them, [1.] That they might, to the honour of their religion, evidence a holy and generous contempt of worldly wealth, in imitation of their father Abraham, who scorned to enrich himself with the spoils of Sodom. [2.] That they might make it appear that they aimed at nothing but their own preservation, and used their interest at court for the saving of their lives, not for the raising of their estates. [3.] Their commission empowered them to destroy the families of their enemies, even the little ones and the women, Est 8:11. But their humanity forbade them to do that, though that was designed against them. They slew none but those they found in arms; and therefore they did not take the spoil, but left it to the women and little ones, whom they spared, for their subsistence; otherwise as good slay them as starve them, take away their lives as take away their livelihoods. Herein they acted with a consideration and compassion well worthy of imitation.

5.What a satisfaction they had in their deliverance. The Jews in the country cleared themselves of their enemies on the thirteenth day of the month, and they rested on the fourteenth day (Est 9:17), and made that a thanksgiving day, Est 9:19. The Jews in Shushan, the royal city, took two days for their military execution, so that they rested on the fifteenth day, and made that their thanksgiving-day, Est 9:18. Both of them celebrated their festival the very day after they had finished their work and gained their point. When we have received signal mercies from God we ought to be quick and speedy in making our thankful returns to him, while the mercy is fresh and the impressions of it are most sensible.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–19. Public domain.
Copy as
Rabanus MaurusAD 856
EXPLANATION ON THE BOOK OF ESTHER 12
Queen Esther’s endeavor to successfully crush her enemies and root them out reveals the eagerness and zeal of a true queen, namely, of the holy church that constantly fights against her enemies and strives to defeat them completely and subdue them. And it is her voice the psalmist uses when he says, “I pursued my enemies and overtook them; and did not turn back until they were consumed. I struck them down so that they were unable to rise.” And when she first kills five hundred people in Susa, and then three hundred, she shows that eternal death awaits not only those who do not want to repent of their sins, but also those who neglect to adorn the faith of the Holy Trinity with good works.
Rabanus MaurusAD 856
Commentary on Esther
What can it mean when we read that the Jews pursued their enemies and killed five hundred men in Shushan, except for the ten sons of Haman whom they nailed to gibbets? Merely that to the people of God, it is not only all the evildoers among the nations who appear to be loathsome and worthy of damnation when they persist in their wickedness, refuse to repent for their sins, and make no effort to obtain forgiveness for their offenses through the grace of the Holy Spirit; but also the actual Jews of the flesh, i.e. those who violated the Decalogue of the Law of Moses, and were guilty of the cross of Christ whom in their faithlessness they took responsibility for at his very passion, are quite rightly forced to bear the torments of Hell. And none of the chosen would deign to share in their wickedness, or to imitate their unspeakable actions; so it makes sense that the text would add that once the Jews had killed their enemies, they refused to touch or to handle any of the spoils of their property.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Esther 9:10 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.