Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Then the king Ahasuerus said unto Esther the queen and to Mordecai the Jew, Behold, I have given Esther the house of Haman, and him they have hanged upon the gallows, because he laid his hand upon the Jews.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Then the king H4428 Ahasuerus H325 said H559 unto Esther H635 the queen H4436 and to Mordecai H4782 the Jew H3064, Behold, I have given H5414 Esther H635 the house H1004 of Haman H2001, and him they have hanged H8518 upon the gallows H6086, because he laid H7971 his hand H3027 upon the Jews H3064.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
King Achashverosh said to Ester the queen and Mordekhai the Jew, "Listen! I gave Ester the house of Haman, and they hanged him on the gallows, because he threatened the lives of the Jews.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
So King Xerxes said to Esther the Queen and Mordecai the Jew, “Behold, I have given Haman’s estate to Esther, and he was hanged on the gallows because he attacked the Jews.
Ask
American Standard Version
Then the king Ahasuerus said unto Esther the queen and to Mordecai the Jew, Behold, I have given Esther the house of Haman, and him they have hanged upon the gallows, because he laid his hand upon the Jews.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Then King Ahasuerus said to Esther the queen and to Mordecai the Jew, “See, I have given Esther the house of Haman, and him they have hanged on the gallows, because he laid his hand on the Jews.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And the King Ahashuerosh sayde vnto the Queene Ester, and to Mordecai the Iewe, Behold, I haue giuen Ester the house of Haman, whome they haue hanged vpon the tree, because he layd hand vpon the Iewes.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And the king Ahasuerus saith to Esther the queen, and to Mordecai the Jew, `Lo, the house of Haman I have given to Esther, and him they have hanged on the tree, because that he put forth his hand on the Jews,
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
Susa in the Time of Esther
Susa in the Time of Esther View full PDF
The Persian Empire in the time of Esther
The Persian Empire in the time of Esther View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 12,825 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Esther 8:7 marks a pivotal moment in the book of Esther, where King Ahasuerus formally confirms the dramatic reversal of fortune by announcing to Queen Esther and Mordecai that Haman's vast estate has been transferred to Esther, and that Haman himself has been executed on the very gallows he prepared for Mordecai. This declaration solidifies the king's judgment against Haman and explicitly states the reason for his demise: his malicious attempt to harm the Jewish people. It sets the stage for the subsequent actions required to counter Haman's genocidal decree, highlighting divine justice and the protection of God's people.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse immediately follows the dramatic climax of Haman's downfall in Esther 7, where Queen Esther courageously exposed his genocidal plot against the Jewish people, leading to his swift execution on the gallows he had prepared for Mordecai. Esther 8:7 serves as the king's official pronouncement of the consequences for Haman's actions, specifically the confiscation of his immense property and the explicit justification for his death. This declaration is crucial as it precedes the king's empowering of Esther and Mordecai to issue a counter-decree in Esther 8:8, which is necessary to avert the impending catastrophe Haman had set in motion. The verse thus seamlessly bridges the narrative of Haman's punishment with the urgent need for the Jewish people's deliverance, setting the stage for their salvation.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The events described unfold within the vast Persian Empire during the reign of King Ahasuerus (historically identified as Xerxes I, 486-465 BC). Persian kings held absolute authority, and their decrees, once issued, were considered irrevocable, a central tension that drives much of the narrative in the book of Esther. The confiscation of a condemned official's property, as seen with Haman's house being given to Esther, was a common practice in ancient Near Eastern empires, serving as both a severe punishment for treason and a means of rewarding loyal subjects. The "gallows" (Hebrew: ʻêts, "tree" or "wood") likely refers to an impaling stake, a particularly severe and humiliating form of execution in the ancient world, signifying utter disgrace. Haman's desire to "lay his hand upon the Jews" reflects the pervasive anti-Semitism that existed in various forms throughout history, where ethnic or religious minorities were often targeted for persecution or extermination, a threat that was very real in the Persian context.
  • Key Themes: Esther 8:7 powerfully articulates several key themes pervasive in the book of Esther. Foremost is Divine Justice and Retribution, where Haman's meticulously planned evil is turned back upon his own head, a principle echoed throughout Scripture, such as in Psalm 7:15-16. This verse also highlights the dramatic Reversal of Fortune, a hallmark of the Esther narrative, transforming the Jews from targets of annihilation to recipients of royal favor and protection. The king's explicit reasoning, "because he laid his hand upon the Jews," underscores the theme of Consequences for Malice, emphasizing that actions driven by hatred and prejudice inevitably lead to ruin. Finally, the king's absolute Authority and Favor are demonstrated, as he not only punishes the wicked but also empowers his loyal subjects, Esther and Mordecai, to enact deliverance for their people, setting the stage for the joyous celebration of Purim.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Haman (Hebrew, Hâmân', H2001): The name of the chief antagonist, a descendant of Agag, the king of the Amalekites (1 Samuel 15:8-9). This lineage imbues Haman with a deep-seated, ancestral enmity against the Jewish people, making his plot not merely political but a continuation of a long-standing spiritual conflict. His name becomes synonymous with evil and anti-Semitism throughout Jewish tradition, representing the archetypal enemy of God's people.
  • Gallows (Hebrew, ʻêts', H6086): While often translated as "gallows," the Hebrew term literally means "the tree" or "the wood." This could refer to an impaling stake, a common and brutal form of execution in the ancient Near East, or a constructed gallows. The specificity of "the tree" emphasizes the very instrument Haman prepared for Mordecai, highlighting the profound poetic justice and irony of his own demise upon it. It serves as a stark symbol of his self-inflicted judgment and the turning of evil upon the evildoer.
  • Laid his hand upon (Hebrew, _shâlach yado'_, H7971): This idiomatic expression signifies hostile intent, aggressive action, or violent assault, often with the aim of causing harm or destruction. In this context, it powerfully conveys Haman's malicious and genocidal plot against the entire Jewish population. The king's use of this phrase explicitly identifies Haman's crime as an act of aggressive malice and attempted violence, justifying the severe punishment meted out to him.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Then the king Ahasuerus said unto Esther the queen and to Mordecai the Jew,": This opening clause formally establishes the recipients of the king's pronouncement, highlighting their elevated status and direct access to the monarch. It signifies the complete reversal of their previous precarious positions – Esther, once risking her life, and Mordecai, once targeted for execution – are now in the king's favor, serving as direct channels for his decrees concerning Haman's fate and the future of the Jews.
  • "Behold, I have given Esther the house of Haman,": This declaration signifies the complete confiscation of Haman's vast wealth and property, transferring it directly to Queen Esther. In ancient Near Eastern cultures, the "house" often encompassed not just the dwelling but also all associated lands, servants, and assets. This act serves as a public symbol of Haman's utter disgrace and the king's profound favor towards Esther, providing her with the resources and authority to manage the affairs related to the Jewish people's deliverance.
  • "and him they have hanged upon the gallows,": This clause confirms Haman's execution, emphasizing the finality of his judgment. The passive voice "they have hanged" implies that the execution was carried out by the king's officials immediately following his conviction, underscoring the swift and decisive justice. The mention of "the gallows" specifically points to the very instrument Haman had prepared for Mordecai, highlighting the profound poetic justice and irony of his demise.
  • "because he laid his hand upon the Jews.": This concluding phrase provides the explicit justification for Haman's execution and the confiscation of his property. It directly links his punishment to his malicious intent and actions against the Jewish people. The phrase "laid his hand upon" is an idiomatic expression denoting hostile and violent action, making it clear that Haman's crime was not merely political intrigue but a direct, genocidal assault on an innocent ethnic group, which the king now condemns unequivocally.

Literary Devices

The narrative of Esther 8:7 is rich with Irony and Reversal, central literary devices throughout the book of Esther. The most striking instance of irony is Haman being hanged on the very gallows he meticulously prepared for Mordecai, a classic example of the schemer falling into his own pit. This dramatic Poetic Justice underscores the theme of divine retribution, even if God is not explicitly named. The entire verse embodies Reversal: Haman, the powerful antagonist, is utterly disgraced and executed, while Esther and Mordecai, once vulnerable, are elevated to positions of immense favor and authority. Haman's vast estate, intended to fund his lavish lifestyle and perhaps his genocidal plot, is now transferred to Esther, effectively empowering the very people he sought to destroy. This swift and complete turnaround of fortune serves to emphasize the providential hand at work, orchestrating events to protect and deliver God's people. The king's direct statement also functions as a Justification, providing the clear, unambiguous reason for Haman's extreme punishment, thereby legitimizing the subsequent actions taken to protect the Jews.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Esther 8:7 powerfully illustrates the theological principle of divine retribution and the sovereignty of God, even in a book where God's name is conspicuously absent. Haman's downfall is not merely a political maneuver but a profound demonstration that evil, though it may flourish for a season, ultimately carries the seeds of its own destruction. The king's explicit reason for Haman's execution—"because he laid his hand upon the Jews"—underscores the divine protection over God's covenant people. This verse reveals that even through human agency and seemingly coincidental events, God works behind the scenes to uphold justice, reverse fortunes, and ensure the preservation of His chosen nation, laying the groundwork for His redemptive plan. It serves as a powerful reminder that no scheme against God's purposes or His people can ultimately succeed.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Esther 8:7 offers profound lessons for contemporary believers. It reminds us that even when circumstances appear overwhelmingly bleak, and evil seems to triumph, God remains sovereign and active, orchestrating events for the good of His people and the fulfillment of His purposes. The dramatic reversal of Haman's fortunes serves as a powerful encouragement to trust in God's ultimate justice, knowing that those who sow malice will inevitably reap ruin. For those facing persecution, injustice, or seemingly insurmountable obstacles, this verse provides a beacon of hope, demonstrating that God can turn the tide swiftly and decisively. It calls us to courageous faith, like Esther, to act boldly when called, and to rest in the assurance that God is always working, even when we cannot perceive His hand directly, to protect His own and bring about His righteous will.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the swift justice against Haman in this verse encourage you when you witness injustice in the world today?
  • In what areas of your life do you need to trust God for a "reversal of fortune" or for His hidden hand to work on your behalf?
  • What lessons can we draw from Haman's downfall about the inevitable consequences of hatred and malicious intent?

FAQ

Why is Haman's house given to Esther, and what does it signify?

Answer: Haman's house, which would have included his vast estate, wealth, and servants, was given to Queen Esther by King Ahasuerus as a direct consequence of Haman's treason and execution. This act served multiple purposes. Firstly, it was a punitive measure against Haman, confiscating his assets as part of his punishment. Secondly, it was a significant act of royal favor towards Esther, demonstrating the king's profound trust and gratitude for her courageous intervention. Culturally, such a transfer of property to a loyal subject was a common way for ancient monarchs to reward and empower. Theologically, it signifies a complete reversal of fortune and divine justice: the very resources intended to support the enemy of God's people are now placed in the hands of their deliverer, providing Esther and Mordecai with the means to manage the subsequent efforts to save the Jews, as seen in Esther 8:8.

Does this verse imply divine intervention, even though God's name is not mentioned in Esther?

Answer: While the book of Esther famously omits any direct mention of God, Esther 8:7, like the entire narrative, is replete with evidence of divine providence and intervention. The dramatic and precise timing of Haman's exposure, his execution on his own gallows, and the immediate transfer of his estate to Esther are too perfectly orchestrated to be mere coincidence. The king's explicit reason for Haman's punishment—"because he laid his hand upon the Jews"—aligns with biblical principles of justice and God's covenantal protection of His people, as seen in passages like Genesis 12:3. The narrative subtly but powerfully portrays God working behind the scenes through human agents and seemingly secular events to accomplish His will and preserve His chosen people.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Esther 8:7 foreshadows the ultimate reversal and victory achieved through Jesus Christ. Haman, who sought to annihilate God's people, is a type of Satan, the great adversary who seeks to "steal and kill and destroy" God's children (John 10:10). Just as Haman was hanged on the very gallows he prepared for Mordecai, so too was Satan's ultimate weapon, death, turned against him through the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus. The cross, seemingly an instrument of defeat, became the means of Satan's decisive overthrow, disarming "the rulers and authorities" and putting them to open shame (Colossians 2:15). Furthermore, Haman's house being given to Esther can be seen as a spiritual parallel to believers inheriting all things in Christ. Through His victory, we, who were once alienated, are now made "heirs of God and fellow heirs with Christ" (Romans 8:17), receiving an eternal inheritance that far surpasses any earthly estate, secured by the ultimate Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. The justice meted out to Haman points to the final judgment awaiting all who oppose God, while the deliverance of the Jews points to the ultimate salvation offered to all who believe in Christ.

Copy as

Commentary on Esther 8 verses 3–14

Haman, the chief enemy of the Jews, was hanged, Mordecai and Esther, their chief friends, were sufficiently protected; but many others there were in the king's dominions that hated the Jews and desired their ruin, and to their rage and malice all the rest of that people lay exposed; for the edict against them was still in force, and, in pursuance of it, their enemies would on the day appointed fall upon them, and they would be deemed as rebels against the king and his government if they should offer to resist and take up arms in their own defence. For the preventing of this,

I. The queen here makes intercession with much affection and importunity. She came, a second time, uncalled into the king's presence (Est 8:3), and was as before encouraged to present her petition, by the king's holding out the golden sceptre to her, Est 8:4. Her petition is that the king, having put away Haman, would put away the mischief of Haman and his device against the Jews, that that might not take place now that he was taken off. Many a man's mischief survives him, and the wickedness he devised operates when he is gone. What men project and write may, after their death, be either very profitable or very pernicious. It was therefore requisite in this case that, for the defeating of Haman's plot, they should apply to the king for a further act of grace, that by another edict he would reverse the letters devised by Haman, and which he wrote (she does not say which the king consented to and confirmed with his own seal; she leaves it to his own conscience to say that), by which he took an effectual course to destroy the Jews in all the king's provinces, Est 8:5. If the king were indeed, as he seemed to be, troubled that such a decree was made, he could not do less than revoke it; for what is repentance, but undoing, to the utmost of our power, what we have done amiss? 1. This petition Esther presents with much affection: She fell down at the king's feet and besought him with tears (Est 8:3), every tear as precious as any of the pearls with which she was adorned. It was time to be earnest when the church of God lay at stake. Let none be so great as to be unwilling to stoop, none so merry as to be unwilling to weep, when thereby they may do any service to God's church and people. Esther, though safe herself, fell down, and begged with tears for the deliverance of her people. 2. She expresses it with great submission, and a profound deference to the king and his wisdom and will (Est 8:5): If it please the king and if I have found favour in his sightand again, "If the thing itself seem right and reasonable before the king, and if I that ask it be pleasing in his eyes, let the decree be reversed." Even when we have the utmost reason and justice on our side, and have the clearest cause to plead, yet it becomes us to speak to our superiors with humility and modesty, and all possible expressions of respect, and not to talk like demandants when we are supplicants. There is nothing lost be decency and good breeding. As soft answers turn away wrath, so soft askings obtain favour. 3. She enforces her petition with a pathetic plea: "For how can I endure to see the evil that shall come upon my people? Little comfort can I have of my own life if I cannot prevail for theirs: as good share in the evil myself as see it come upon them; for how can I endure to see the destruction of my kindred, that are dear to me?" Esther, a queen, owns her poor kindred, and speaks of them with a very tender concern. Now it was that she mingled her tears with her words, that she wept and made supplication; we read of no tears when she begged for her own life, but, now that she was sure of that, she wept for her people. Tears of pity and tenderness are the most Christ-like. Those that are truly concerned for the public would rather die in the last ditch than live to see the desolations of the church of God and the ruin of their country. Tender spirits cannot bear to think of the destruction of their people and kindred, and therefore dare not omit any opportunity of giving them relief.

II. The king here takes a course for the preventing of the mischief that Haman had designed. 1. The king knew, and informed the queen, that, according to the constitution of the Persian government, the former edict could not be revoked (Est 8:8): What is written in the king's name, and sealed with the king's ring, may not, under any pretence whatsoever, be reversed. This was a fundamental article of their magna charta, that no law or decree, when once it had passed the royal assent, could be repealed or recalled, no judgment vacated, no attainder reversed, Dan 6:15. This is so far from bespeaking the wisdom and honour of the Medes and Persians that really it bespeaks their pride and folly, and consequently their shame. It is ridiculous in itself for any man, or company of men, to pretend to such an infallibility of wisdom as to foresee all the consequences of what they decree; and therefore it is unjust, and injurious to mankind, to claim such a supremacy of power as to make their decrees irrevocable, whether the consequences prove good or bad. This savours of that old presumption which ruined us all: We will be as gods. Much more prudent is that proviso of our constitution, that no law can, by any words or sanctions whatsoever, be made unrepealable, any more than any estate unalienable. Cujus est instruere, ejus est destruere - the right to enact implies the right to repeal. It is God's prerogative not to repent, and to say what can never be altered or unsaid. 2. Yet he found an expedient to undo the devices of Haman, and defeat his design, by signing and publishing another decree to authorize the Jews to stand upon their defence, vim vi repellere, et invasorem occidere - to oppose force to force, and destroy the assailant. This would be their effectual security. The king shows them that he had done enough already to convince them that he had a concern for the Jewish nation, for he had ordered his favourite to be hanged because he laid his hand upon the Jews (Est 8:7), and he therefore would d the utmost he could to protect them; and he leaves it as fully with Esther and Mordecai to use his name and power for their deliverance as before he had left it with Haman to use his name and power for their destruction: "Write for the Jews as it liketh you (Est 8:8), saving only the honour of our constitution. Let the mischief be put away as effectually as may be without reversing the letters." The secretaries of state were ordered to attend to draw up this edict on the twenty-third day of the third month (Est 8:9), about two months after the promulgation of the former, but nine months before the time set for its execution: it was to be drawn up and published in the respective languages of all the provinces. Shall the subjects of an earthly prince have his decrees in a language they understand? and shall God's oracles and laws be locked up from his servants in an unknown tongue? It was to be directed to the proper officers of every province, both to the justices of peace and to the deputy-lieutenants. It was to be carefully dispersed throughout all the king's dominions, and true copies sent by expresses to all the provinces. The purport of this decree was to commission the Jews, upon the day which was appointed for their destruction, to draw together in a body for their own defence. And, (1.) To stand for their life, that, whoever assaulted them, it might be at their peril. (2.) They might not only act defensively, but might destroy, and slay, and cause to perish, all the power of the people that would assault them, men, women, and children (Est 8:11), and thus to avenge themselves on their enemies (Est 8:13), and, if they pleased, to enrich themselves by their enemies, for they were empowered to take the spoil of them for a prey. Now, [1.] This showed his kindness to the Jews, and sufficiently provided for their safety; for he latter decree would be looked upon as a tacit revocation of the former, though not in expression. But, [2.] It shows the absurdity of that branch of their constitution that none of the king's edicts might be repealed; for it laid the king here under a necessity of enacting a civil war in his own dominions, between the Jews and their enemies, so that both sides took up arms by his authority, and yet against his authority. No better could come of men's pretending to be wise above what is given them. Great expedition was used in dispersing this decree, the king himself being in pain lest it should come too late and any mischief should be done to the Jews by virtue of the former decree before the notice of this arrived. It was therefore by the king's commandment, as well as Mordecai's, that the messengers were hastened and pressed on (Est 8:14), and had swift beasts provided them, Est 8:10. It was not a time to trifle when so many lives were in danger.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 3–14. Public domain.
Copy as
Rabanus MaurusAD 856
EXPLANATION ON THE BOOK OF ESTHER 11
The fact that Esther falls at the feet of the king and entreats him for the salvation of the people plainly symbolizes the holy church that humbly implores the almighty Lord every day for the rescue of her children through the faith and the mystery of the incarnation of the only begotten Son, so that the arrogance of her enemies may be restrained by the (Lord’s) grace, and the innocence of the faithful may be freed from the clutches of the (wicked). The heavenly king holds out his golden scepter to the pleading queen because he abundantly bestows the clemency of his mercy upon her. She asks that the old decree of the most wicked Haman may be changed into a new decree. Indeed this is the interest of the true queen, namely that any sect that is in error, any hostile plot which the ancient enemy prepares through his ministers for the extinction of the people of God, may be repelled and destroyed through the saving documents of the gospel.
Rabanus MaurusAD 856
Commentary on Esther
So when Esther falls at the feet of the king and beseeches him for the sake of her people, this must refer to the fact that every day the holy Church humbly petitions the Lord Almighty—through the faith and mysteries of the incarnate, only-born Son of God—to free her children so that through his grace, the arrogance of the enemy might be crushed and the innocence of the faithful be freed from their hands. The supreme king holds out his golden scepter toward the queen as she pleads with him, because he is lavishing on her the mercy of his righteousness. She asks that the earlier letters of the wicked Haman be replaced with new instructions, because it is the fervent wish of the new queen that the followers of every error in doctrine, and all the hostile machinations with which the ancient enemy tried through its agents to exterminate the people of God, should be rejected and destroyed by the thoroughly salutary writings of the Gospels. The letters themselves are written in the name of the king and then sealed with his ring, because the teaching of the Gospels—which are preached throughout the world in the name of Christ—are declared everywhere to be confirmed by the seal of the Holy Spirit, since the preachers themselves, who are filled with its gift, seem to everyone to be undefeatable in their unflagging strength and to remain ever glorious and triumphant over their enemies.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Esther 8:7 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.