TRV
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Ecclesiastes 5:9–17. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Solomon had shown the vanity of pleasure, gaiety, and fine works, of honour, power, and royal dignity; and there is many a covetous worldling that will agree with him, and speak as slightly as he does of these things; but money, he thinks, is a substantial thing, and if he can but have enough of that he is happy. This is the mistake which Solomon attacks, and attempts to rectify, in these verses; he shows that there is as much vanity in great riches, and the lust of the eye about them, as there is in the lusts of the flesh and the pride of life, and a man can make himself no more happy by hoarding an estate than by spending it.
I.He grants that the products of the earth, for the support and comfort of human life, are valuable things (Ecc 5:9):
The profit of the earth is for all. Man's body, being made of the earth, thence has its maintenance (Job 28:5); and that it has so, and that a barren land is not made his dwelling (as he has deserved for being rebellious, Psa 68:6), is an instance of God's great bounty to him. There is profit to be got out of the earth, and it is for all; all need it; it is appointed for all; there is enough for all. It is not only for all men, but for all the inferior creatures; the same ground brings grass for the cattle that brings herbs for the service of men. Israel had bread from heaven, angels' food, but (which is a humbling consideration) the earth is our storehouse and the beasts are fellow-commoners with us. The king himself is served of the field, and would be ill served, would be quite starved, without its products. This puts a great honour upon the husbandman's calling, that it is the most necessary of all to the support of man's life. The many have the benefit of it; the mighty cannot live without it; it is for all; it is for the king himself. Those that have an abundance of the fruits of the earth must remember they are for all, and therefore must look upon themselves but as stewards of their abundance, out of which they must give to those that need. Dainty meats and soft clothing are only for some, but the fruit of the earth is for all. And even those that suck the abundance of the seas (Deu 33:19) cannot be without the fruit of the earth, while those that have a competency of the fruit of the earth may despise the abundance of the seas.
II.He maintains that the riches that are more than these, that are for hoarding, not for use, are vain things, and will not make a man easy or happy. That which our Saviour has said (Luk 12:15), that a man's life consists not in the abundance of the things which he possesses, is what Solomon here undertakes to prove by various arguments.
1.The more men have the more they would have, Ecc 5:10. A man may have but a little silver and be satisfied with it, may know when he has enough and covet no more. Godliness, with contentment, is great gain. I have enough, says Jacob; I have all, and abound, says St. Paul: but,
(1.)He that loves silver, and sets his heart upon it, will never think he has enough, but enlarges his desire as hell (Hab 2:5), lays house to house and field to field (Isa 5:8), and, like the daughters of the horse-leech, still cries, Give, give. Natural desires are at rest when that which is desired is obtained, but corrupt desires are insatiable. Nature is content with little, grace with less, but lust with nothing.
(2.)He that has silver in abundance, and has it increasing ever so fast upon him, yet does not find that it yields any solid satisfaction to his soul. There are bodily desires which silver itself will not satisfy; if a man be hungry, ingots of silver will do no more to satisfy his hunger than clods of clay. Much less will worldly abundance satisfy spiritual desires; he that has ever so much silver covets more, not only of that, but of something else, something of another nature. Those that make themselves drudges to the world are spending their labour for that which satisfies not (Isa 55:2), which fills the belly, but will never fill the soul, Eze 7:19.
2.The more men have the more occasion they have for it, and the more they have to do with it, so that it is as broad as it is long: When goods increase, they are increased that eat them, Ecc 5:11. The more meat the more mouths. Does the estate thrive? And does not the family at the same time grow more numerous and the children grow up to need more? The more men have the better house they must keep, the more servants they must employ, the more guests they must entertain, the more they must give to the poor, and the more they will have hanging on them, for where the carcase is the eagles will be. What we have more than food and raiment we have for others; and then what good is there to the owners themselves, but the pleasure of beholding it with their eyes? And a poor pleasure it is. An empty speculation is all the difference between the owners and the sharers; the owner sees that as his own which those about him enjoy as much of the real benefit of as he; only he has the satisfaction of doing good to others, which indeed is a satisfaction to one who believes what Christ said, that it is more blessed to give than to receive; but to a covetous man, who thinks all lost that goes beside himself, it is a constant vexation to see others eat of his increase.
3.The more men have the more care they have about it, which perplexes them and disturbs their repose, Ecc 5:12. Refreshing sleep is as much the support and comfort of this life as food is. Now,
(1.)Those commonly sleep best that work hard and have but what they work for: The sleep of the labouring man is sweet, not only because he has tired himself with his labour, which makes his sleep the more welcome to him and makes him sleep soundly, but because he has little to fill his head with care about and so break his sleep. His sleep is sweet, though he eat but little and have but little to eat, for his weariness rocks him asleep; and, though he eat much, yet he can sleep well, for his labour gets him a good digestion. The sleep of the diligent Christian, and his long sleep, is sweet; for, having spent himself and his time in the service of God, he can cheerfully return to God and repose in him as his rest.
(2.)Those that have every thing else often fail to secure a good night's sleep. Either their eyes are held waking or their sleeps are unquiet and do not refresh them; and it is their abundance that breaks their sleep and disturbs it, both the abundance of their care (as the rich man's who, when his ground brought forth plentifully, thought within himself, What shall I do? Luk 12:17) and the abundance of what they eat and drink which overcharges the heart, makes them sick, and so hinders their repose. Ahasuerus, after a banquet of wine, could not sleep; and perhaps consciousness of guilt, both in getting and using what they have, breaks their sleep as much as any thing. But God gives his beloved sleep.
4.The more men have the more danger they are in both of doing mischief and of having mischief done them (Ecc 5:13): There is an evil, a sore evil, which Solomon himself had seen under the sun, in this lower world, this theatre of sin and woe - riches left for the owners thereof (who have been industrious to hoard them and keep them safely) to their hurt; they would have been better without them.
(1.)Their riches do them hurt, make them proud, secure, and in love with the world, draw away their hearts from God and duty, and make it very difficult for them to enter into the kingdom of heaven, nay, help to shut them out of it.
(2.)They do hurt with their riches, which not only put them into a capacity of gratifying their own lusts and living luxuriously, but give them an opportunity of oppressing others and dealing hardly with them.
(3.)Often they sustain hurt by their riches. They would not be envied, would not be robbed, if they were not rich. It is the fat beast that is led first to the slaughter. A very rich man (as one observes) has sometimes been excepted out of a general pardon, both as to life and estate, merely on account of his vast and overgrown estate; so riches often take away the life of the owners thereof, Pro 1:19.
5.The more men have the more they have to lose, and perhaps they may lose it all, Ecc 5:14. Those riches that have been laid up with a great deal of pains, and kept with a great deal of care, perish by evil travail, by the very pains and care which they take to secure and increase them. Many a one has ruined his estate by being over-solicitous to advance it and make it more, and has lost all by catching at all. Riches are perishing things, and all our care about them cannot make them otherwise; they make themselves wings and fly away. He that thought he should have made his son a gentleman leaves him a beggar; he begets a son, and brings him up in the prospect of an estate, but, when he dies, leaves it under a charge of debt as much as it is worth, so that there is nothing in his hand. This is a common case; estates that made a great show do not prove what they seemed, but cheat the heir.
6.How much soever men have when they die, they must leave it all behind them (Ecc 5:15, Ecc 5:16): As he came forth of his mother's womb naked, so shall he return; only as his friends, when he came naked into the world, in pity to him, helped him with swaddling-clothes, so, when he goes out, they help him with grave-clothes, and that is all. See Job 1:21; Psa 49:17. This is urged as a reason why we should be content with such things as we have, Ti1 6:7. In respect of the body we must go as we came; the dust shall return to the earth as it was. But sad is our case if the soul return as it came, for we were born in sin, and if we die in sin, unsanctified, we had better never have been born; and that seems to be the case of the worldling here spoken of, for he is said to return in all points as he came, as sinful, as miserable, and much more so. This is a sore evil; he thinks it so whose heart is glued to the world, that he shall take nothing of his labour which he may carry away in his hand; his riches will not go with him into another world nor stand him in any stead there. If we labour in religion, the grace and comfort we get by that labour we may carry away in our hearts, and shall be the better for it to eternity; that is meat that endures. But if we labour only for the world, to fill our hands with that, we cannot take that away with us; we are born with our hands griping, but we die with them extended, letting go what we held fast. So that, upon the whole matter, he may well ask, What profit has he that has laboured for the wind? Note, Those that labour for the world labour for the wind, for that which has more sound than substance, which is uncertain, and always shifting its point, unsatisfying, and often hurtful, which we cannot hold fast, and which, if we take up with it as our portion, will no more feed us than the wind, Hos 12:1. Men will see that they have laboured for the wind when at death they find the profit of their labour is all gone, gone like the wind, they know not whither.
7.Those that have much, if they set their hearts upon it, have not only uncomfortable deaths, but uncomfortable lives too, Ecc 5:17. This covetous worldling, that is so bent upon raising an estate, all his days eats in darkness and much sorrow, and it is his sickness and wrath; he has not only no pleasure of his estate, nor any enjoyment of it himself, for he eats the bread of sorrow (Psa 127:2), but a great deal of vexation to see others eat of it. His necessary expenses make him sick, make him fret, and he seems as if he were angry that himself and those about him cannot live without meat. As we read the last clause, it intimates how ill this covetous worldling can bear the common and unavoidable calamities of human life. When he is in health he eats in darkness, always dull with care and fear about what he has; but, if he be sick, he has much sorrow and wrath with his sickness; he is vexed that his sickness takes him off from his business and hinders him in his pursuits of the world, vexed that all his wealth will not give him any ease or relief, but especially terrified with the apprehensions of death (which his diseases are the harbingers of), of leaving this world and the things of it behind him, which he has set his affections upon, and removing to a world he has made no preparation for. He has not any sorrow after a godly sort, does not sorrow to repentance, but he has sorrow and wrath, is angry at the providence of God, angry at his sickness, angry at all about him, fretful and peevish, which doubles his affliction, which a good man lessens and lightens by patience and joy in his sickness.
Historical interpretation
Historical Reception
7 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
Ecclesiastes sees that riches are kept for ill by one who possesses them, for their loss causes a very great anxiety and disquiet. Indeed they are lost, for they are left here and can be of no advantage to one who is dead. And so, the dead man felt anxiety in regard to them and could not find rest; he left what would bring him shame and did not take with himself what he could keep. He was far different from him of whom it is written, “Blessed is the man that has filled his desire with them; he shall not be confounded when he speaks to his enemies in the gate.” His inheritance is the Lord, his reward is from the offspring of the Virgin Mary, and he is extolled with praises in the going forth of wisdom.
Wherefore Ecclesiastes says, “There is a grievous illness which I have seen under the sun: riches kept to the hurt of the owner.” … If you are desirous of treasure, take the invisible and the intangible which is to be found in the heavens on high, not that which is in the deepest veins of the earth. Be poor in spirit and you will be rich, no matter what your worldly goods are. “A man’s life does not consist in the abundance of his possessions,” but in his virtue and in his faith. This richness will enrich you if you are rich in your relations to God.
Of what use is wealth that belongs to someone? He is obviously lord over his wealth. The wealth somebody owns is his amenity and he himself is lord over his wealth. As he himself can use wealth well by being lord over it and not its slave, so also wealth can become lord over him who owns it. Woe to that person. That is the case if he is greedy and becomes a slave of mammon.
People use their children as an excuse for gathering riches. At times they do injustice, rob and do similar things, saying: “I’m doing this for my children.” … I have seen a person who struggled to become rich, but his riches were of no use. He did not enjoy them himself, nor did his son receive them, but he remained poor and in the same state as he had entered the world. After all, he was not born with money or with clothes.…Only the soul’s goods can be taken away into heaven.… If he has done good with his money, if he has a good reputation and honor, and if he has tried to help the weak, then he takes with him something of what he has labored for, namely, that he has done good.
An abundance of evil can be revealed in wealth. But this type of evil should be viewed as more of a weakness. Therefore, everyone who guards his wealth for himself does not know the wisdom of God, nor is his heart inclined to insight, nor to instructing his children. He has neither received the words of God’s commandments nor has he hidden them in his heart.
The same thing happens as every one may perceive with regard to sleep. For not a soft couch, or a bedstead overlaid with silver, or the quietness that exists throughout the house, or anything else of this kind are so generally likely to make sleep sweet and pleasant, as labor and fatigue, and the need of sleep, and drowsiness when one lies down. And to this particular the experience of facts, nay, before actual experience, the assertion of the Scriptures bears witness. For Solomon, who had passed his life in luxury, when he wished to make this matter evident, said, “The sleep of a laboring man is sweet, whether he eat little or much.” Why does he add, “whether he eat little or much”? Both these things usually bring sleeplessness, namely, indigence and excess of food; the one drying up the body, stiffening the eyelids and not suffering them to be closed; the other straitening and oppressing the breath and inducing many pains. But at the same time so powerful a persuasive is labor, that though both these things should befall them, servants are able to sleep. For since throughout the whole day, they are running about everywhere, ministering to their masters, being knocked about and hard pressed, and having but little time to take breath, they receive a sufficient recompense for their toils and labors in the pleasure of sleeping. And thus it has happened through the goodness of God toward humanity, that these pleasures are not to be purchased with gold and silver but with labor, with hard toil, with necessity, and every kind of discipline. Not so the rich. On the contrary, while lying on their beds, they are frequently without sleep through the whole night; and though they devise many schemes, they do not obtain such pleasure. But the poor person, when released from his daily labors, having his limbs completely tired, falls almost before he can lie down into a slumber that is sound, and sweet, and genuine, enjoying this reward, which is not a small one, of his fair day’s toils. Since therefore the poor person sleeps, and drinks, and eats with more pleasure than the rich person, what further value is left to riches, now deprived of the one advantage they seemed to have over poverty?
"There
is a sickening evil that I have seen under the sun; riches hoarded by their
owner to his misfortune, and he loses those riches in some bad venture. If he begets a son, he has nothing in
hand. As he had come from his mother's
womb, naked will he return, as he had come; he can salvage nothing from his
labour to take with him. This too, is a
sickening evil: Exactly as he came he must depart, and what did he gain in exchange
for toiling for the wind? Indeed, all
his life he eats in darkness; he is greatly grieved, and has illness and
anger." Take what follows as linked to what is written above:
while Ecclesiastes describes wealth, even he is not able to enjoy his riches and
on many occasions endangers himself on account of them. Nor to his heir does he leave what he has
amassed; but even he and his son, just as they came nude, will return nude to
the earth and nothing of their toil will accompany them. Surely apathy is the worst, to be tortured by
thought on account of riches, and wealth will perish. And are we able to take it with us when we
die, in sadness, in mourning, in indignation, in laws or to seek it in vain
toil? And all this is according to the
apparent simple meaning of the text. But
as we are lifted higher, it seems to me that it speaks about the philosophers,
or the heretics, who amass riches of doctrines into their wickedness, and nor
are authors able to follow any usefulness, nor leave perpetual fruit for their
followers. But even they and their
disciples return to the earth and lose their riches, from him who said, "I
will lose the wisdom of the wise men, and I will reprove the prudence of the
careful." [I Cor. 1, 19.]
Truly
in fact, just as they left their mother's womb, (apparently as from a heretical
church), contrary to this about which it is written: "but Jerusalem which
is above is free, which is the mother of all." [Gal. 4, 26.]
Thus
they go nude to become a spirit, and work for nothing. Those who examine, lack examination, and they
are carried on every wind of doctrine, nor do they have the light, but eat
their sacraments in the darkness. They
are always ill, and are easily moved to anger, storing up anger for themselves
for the day of anger, and they do not have the favour of God.
Continue studying Ecclesiastes 5:13 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Ecclesiastes 5:13 presents a profound and unsettling observation from Qoheleth: the accumulation of wealth, often pursued as a means to security and happiness, can paradoxically become a source of profound detriment and affliction for its possessor. This verse identifies a "sore evil" pervasive "under the sun"—a perspective limited to earthly realities—where material riches, rather than serving as a blessing, ultimately inflict harm upon their owners, thereby exposing the inherent futility and potential dangers of a life consumed by the pursuit of material gain apart from divine wisdom.
Context
Literary Context
Ecclesiastes 5:13 is strategically placed within Qoheleth's extended critique of wealth and its limitations, spanning Ecclesiastes 5:8-20 and Ecclesiastes 6:1-12. Preceding this verse, Qoheleth has warned against the oppression of the poor and the insatiable nature of greed, noting that "Whoever loves money never has enough" (Ecclesiastes 5:10). The immediate verses (Ecclesiastes 5:10-12) highlight the anxieties and increased burdens that accompany wealth, such as the inability to sleep due to abundance. Verse 13 then introduces a particularly grievous consequence: riches held to the owner's detriment. This observation sets the stage for the subsequent illustrations of how such wealth can be lost through misfortune (Ecclesiastes 5:14) and the ultimate reality that one departs life as naked as they arrived (Ecclesiastes 5:15-17). Thus, Ecclesiastes 5:13 serves as a pivotal statement, encapsulating a core problem that Qoheleth further elaborates upon in the surrounding discourse.
Historical & Cultural Context
In ancient Israel, wealth was primarily derived from agricultural land, livestock, or trade. Unlike modern economies, there were limited sophisticated financial instruments for investment or secure banking. Consequently, hoarding physical assets—such as grain, precious metals, or large herds—was a common method for preserving wealth. However, this practice also rendered assets highly vulnerable to a myriad of risks: theft by bandits, destruction by natural disasters (drought, famine, pests), political instability, or the simple fact that one could not take their accumulated wealth beyond the grave. While prosperity was often viewed as a sign of divine blessing in the ancient Near East, Qoheleth, through his "under the sun" observations, consistently challenges simplistic correlations between material gain and true well-being. His insights reflect a keen awareness of the precariousness of earthly possessions and the often-unseen burdens they impose, particularly when wealth becomes an end in itself rather than a means or a stewardship.
Key Themes
Ecclesiastes 5:13 powerfully contributes to several foundational themes woven throughout the book. Firstly, it profoundly underscores the vanity and futility of human endeavors, especially the relentless pursuit and accumulation of material wealth, a central motif introduced in Ecclesiastes 1:2. Riches, far from providing lasting satisfaction or security, are here exposed as a potential source of "hurt," demonstrating their ultimate emptiness when divorced from a higher purpose. Secondly, the verse highlights the deceitfulness of materialism, revealing how something widely perceived as beneficial can become a profound detriment. The Preacher consistently exposes the deceptive nature of worldly wisdom and pursuits that promise fulfillment but deliver only "vexation of spirit," a theme explored in his reflections on wisdom, pleasure, and toil throughout Ecclesiastes 2. Lastly, this verse touches upon the pervasive theme of human suffering and the problem of evil, observing that even one's own possessions can become a source of pain, a recurring motif in Qoheleth's honest and often somber assessment of life's harsh realities "under the sun."
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
Meaning to be rubbed or worn; figuratively, to be weak, sick, or afflicted; causatively, to grieve or make sick. When combined with "evil" (raʻ), it intensifies the meaning, describing an evil that is deeply painful, grievous, or even "sickening." It emphasizes the severe, debilitating, and unhealthy nature of the detriment caused by hoarded wealth, suggesting a wound or a chronic ailment rather than a mere inconvenience.
Meaning bad or (as a noun) evil, whether natural or moral; encompassing adversity, affliction, calamity, distress, grief, harm, hurt, mischief, sorrow, or trouble. Here, it describes a profound detriment or calamity, indicating that the riches themselves, or the manner in which they are kept, inflict genuine suffering or damage upon the owner. It signifies a significant, painful problem, not just a minor annoyance.
Meaning a master; hence, a husband, or (figuratively) owner. This term implies possession and mastery. The irony highlighted in the verse is that the "owner"—the one who supposedly controls and benefits from the wealth—is precisely the one who experiences "hurt." This suggests a reversal of roles where the possessor becomes, in effect, possessed or harmed by what they claim to master, revealing the deceptive nature of such ownership.
Verse Breakdown
"There is a sore evil which I have seen under the sun"
Qoheleth begins with a declarative statement, presenting his observation as a verifiable truth rooted in personal experience ("I have seen"). The phrase "sore evil" immediately signals a profound and grievous problem, an affliction that causes deep pain or distress. The characteristic phrase "under the sun" delimits the scope of this observation to the earthly realm, emphasizing a human perspective that often fails to grasp divine purposes or eternal realities. It sets the stage for a critique of life's inherent frustrations when viewed solely from a temporal standpoint.
"namely, riches kept for the owners thereof to their hurt."
This clause precisely identifies the "sore evil." It is not wealth itself that is inherently problematic, but rather "riches kept"—specifically, wealth that is hoarded, accumulated, or clung to in a manner that ultimately proves detrimental. The term "owners" (baʻal) underscores the ironic twist: those who possess and control the wealth are the very ones who suffer. The concluding phrase "to their hurt" specifies the outcome, indicating that this keeping of riches results in genuine damage, pain, or disadvantage for the individual. This "hurt" can manifest in various forms, including anxiety, fear of loss, spiritual emptiness, isolation, or even physical illness stemming from the burdens and misplaced priorities associated with wealth.
Literary Devices
Ecclesiastes 5:13 masterfully employs several potent literary devices to convey its sobering truth. The most prominent is Irony, as the very thing commonly sought for security, comfort, and happiness—riches—is paradoxically revealed to be a source of profound "hurt" and a "sore evil." This counter-intuitive truth challenges conventional human wisdom and expectations. The phrase "sore evil" itself functions as Hyperbole, emphasizing the extreme and painful nature of the problem, suggesting it is not merely an inconvenience but a deep, pervasive affliction. Furthermore, the recurring phrase "under the sun" serves as a crucial Framing Device throughout Ecclesiastes, consistently reminding the reader that these observations are made from a human, earthly perspective, highlighting the limitations of such a worldview and subtly pointing to the need for a transcendent, God-centered one. The verse also exemplifies Empirical Wisdom, as Qoheleth grounds his theological insight in direct observation, stating, "I have seen," thereby lending authority and verisimilitude to his pronouncement.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Ecclesiastes 5:13 offers a stark and timeless theological commentary on the nature of material wealth and its profound potential for spiritual and personal detriment. It aligns seamlessly with a consistent biblical theme that warns against the dangers of idolatry, particularly the worship of mammon. While wealth itself is not inherently evil—it can be a blessing when stewarded righteously—the verse powerfully illustrates how the keeping, hoarding, or ultimate trust in riches, driven by a desire for security or status apart from God, can become a "sore evil." This perspective fundamentally challenges the common human tendency to find ultimate security, satisfaction, and identity in possessions, redirecting focus to the true source of life and blessing, which is God alone. The "hurt" described can encompass a wide range of negative consequences: spiritual emptiness, debilitating anxiety, corrosive greed, a detachment from genuine relationships, and ultimately, a separation from God, revealing the destructive power of misplaced trust and idolatrous devotion.
Reflection and Application
Ecclesiastes 5:13 serves as a timeless and convicting mirror, reflecting the persistent human inclination to find ultimate security, significance, and happiness in material possessions, only to discover their inherent capacity to wound, disappoint, and even enslave. It compels us to critically examine our own relationship with wealth: Is it a tool for good, stewarded for God's purposes and the welfare of others, or has it subtly transformed into an idol, a source of anxiety, or a barrier to genuine spiritual freedom and relational depth? The "hurt" Qoheleth describes is multifaceted, encompassing the spiritual impoverishment that comes from prioritizing perishable riches over eternal values, the emotional burden of constant worry over loss and maintenance, the relational strain that often accompanies greed and hoarding, and the ultimate realization of life's brevity in the face of accumulated but ultimately useless treasures. True flourishing, this verse implies, is not found in endless accumulation but in contentment, radical generosity, and a deep, unwavering trust in God's sovereign provision and ultimate goodness. This verse calls us to cultivate a posture of detachment from the world's fleeting treasures, recognizing that our ultimate security, joy, and purpose reside not in what we possess, but in the One who possesses us and invites us into His eternal kingdom.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What does "under the sun" mean in Ecclesiastes?
The phrase "under the sun" (tachat ha'shemesh in Hebrew) is a distinctive and recurring motif throughout the book of Ecclesiastes, appearing nearly 30 times. It serves as a crucial framing device, referring to life as observed from a purely human, earthly perspective, without the full revelation of God's transcendent purposes or eternal realities. It signifies the limitations of human wisdom, experience, and striving when viewed apart from divine intervention or an eternal hope. Qoheleth uses this phrase to underscore his empirical approach to understanding life's challenges and to highlight the vanity and futility of all human endeavors and pursuits—including the accumulation of wealth—when they are confined to the temporal realm and lack a divine reference point. It emphasizes that the conclusions drawn are based on what can be seen and experienced in the world, as exemplified in Ecclesiastes 1:3.
How can riches "hurt" their owners, as stated in this verse?
Riches can "hurt" their owners in several profound and often insidious ways, as Qoheleth keenly observes. Firstly, the anxiety and worry associated with protecting, managing, and increasing large sums of wealth can rob a person of peace, joy, and even sleep, as noted in Ecclesiastes 5:12. Secondly, the pursuit and possession of wealth can lead to isolation and distrust, as owners become suspicious of others' motives or withdraw from genuine, selfless relationships. Thirdly, and perhaps most significantly, the relentless pursuit and hoarding of riches can foster greed and profound spiritual decay, shifting one's ultimate devotion and trust from God to material possessions, which the Bible consistently describes as idolatry. Fourthly, wealth is inherently precarious and can be lost suddenly through misfortune, economic downturns, poor investments, or natural disasters, as vividly illustrated in Ecclesiastes 5:14. Finally, a life consumed by accumulating wealth often results in spiritual emptiness and a lack of true fulfillment, as material possessions cannot satisfy the deepest longings of the human heart, ultimately proving vain and useless in the face of death, when one departs life as naked as they arrived (Ecclesiastes 5:15-17).
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Ecclesiastes 5:13, with its stark warning about riches hurting their owners, finds its profound Christ-centered fulfillment in the person and teachings of Jesus. While Qoheleth observes the "sore evil" of wealth from "under the sun"—a human perspective limited by mortality—Jesus, the Son of God, offers the divine perspective and the ultimate solution to the human dilemma concerning material possessions. He consistently challenged the human tendency to find security and identity in earthly treasures, unequivocally declaring that "no one can serve two masters... You cannot serve God and money [mammon]" (Matthew 6:24). Jesus Himself demonstrated the true nature of wealth by emptying Himself, becoming poor, so that through His profound poverty, we might become truly rich in God (2 Corinthians 8:9). He taught that true riches are not found in perishable material possessions but in the eternal Kingdom of God and a right relationship with Him, urging His followers to "store up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where moths and vermin do not destroy, and where thieves do not break in and steal" (Matthew 6:20). The "hurt" Qoheleth describes is ultimately the spiritual death and separation from God that results from idolatry and misplaced trust; Christ, through His atoning sacrifice on the cross, offers liberation from this bondage, providing true life and an inheritance that is imperishable, undefiled, and unfading, kept in heaven for us (1 Peter 1:4). In Jesus, the ultimate "owner" of all things and the one who perfectly stewarded His life, we find the true purpose and blessing of resources: not in hoarding them to our hurt, but in stewarding them generously for His glory and the advancement of His eternal Kingdom, finding our ultimate satisfaction in Him alone.