Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
There is one alone, and there is not a second; yea, he hath neither child nor brother: yet is there no end of all his labour; neither is his eye satisfied with riches; neither saith he, For whom do I labour, and bereave my soul of good? This is also vanity, yea, it is a sore travail.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
There is H3426 one H259 alone, and there is not a second H8145; yea, he hath neither child H1121 nor brother H251: yet is there no end H7093 of all his labour H5999; neither is his eye H5869 satisfied H7646 with riches H6239; neither saith he, For whom do I labour H6001, and bereave H2637 my soul H5315 of good H2896? This is also vanity H1892, yea, it is a sore H7451 travail H6045.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
the situation in which a solitary individual without a companion, with neither son nor brother, keeps on working endlessly but never has enough wealth. "For whom" [he should ask], "am I working so hard and denying myself pleasure?"This too is truly pointless, a sorry business.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
There is a man all alone, without even a son or brother. And though there is no end to his labor, his eyes are still not content with his wealth: “For whom do I toil and bereave my soul of enjoyment?” This too is futile—a miserable task.
Ask
American Standard Version
There is one that is alone, and he hath not a second; yea, he hath neither son nor brother; yet is there no end of all his labor, neither are his eyes satisfied with riches. For whom then, saith he, do I labor, and deprive my soul of good? This also is vanity, yea, it is a sore travail.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
There is one who is alone, and he has neither son nor brother. There is no end to all of his labor, neither are his eyes satisfied with wealth. “For whom then, do I labor, and deprive my soul of enjoyment?” This also is vanity. Yes, it is a miserable business.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
There is one alone, and there is not a second, which hath neither sonne nor brother, yet is there none end of all his trauaile, neither can his eye be satisfied with riches: neither doeth he thinke, For whome doe I trauaile and defraude my soule of pleasure? this also is vanitie, and this is an euill trauaile.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
There is one, and there is not a second; even son or brother he hath not, and there is no end to all his labour! His eye also is not satisfied with riches, and he saith not , `For whom am I labouring and bereaving my soul of good?' This also is vanity, it is a sad travail.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Ecclesiastes 4:8 offers a poignant portrayal of the profound futility inherent in a solitary life consumed by ceaseless labor and the relentless pursuit of wealth. The Preacher observes an individual who, despite lacking familial ties or heirs to share their prosperity with, continues to toil without end, finding no genuine satisfaction in their accumulated riches. This isolated, insatiable striving, devoid of relational purpose, is ultimately declared to be "vanity" and a "sore travail," underscoring the inherent meaninglessness and grievous burden of such an existence "under the sun."

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is strategically placed within a larger discourse in Ecclesiastes (chapter 4) where Qoheleth, the Preacher, meticulously observes and critiques various facets of human endeavor and societal structures from a purely earthly perspective, signified by the recurring phrase "under the sun." Immediately preceding Ecclesiastes 4:7, the Preacher introduces the "vanity" of a man who is alone, without a "second" or family, yet labors without end. Verse 8 then expands upon this observation, delving deeper into the specific characteristics and ultimate emptiness of such a solitary pursuit of wealth. The subsequent verses, Ecclesiastes 4:9-12, provide a stark and intentional contrast by extolling the profound benefits, strength, and mutual support found in companionship and community, making the isolation described in verse 8 even more acutely felt and highlighting the Preacher's underlying argument for relational connection.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In ancient Israelite society, the family unit was the indispensable foundation of existence, providing not only identity and security but also ensuring continuity across generations. Having children, particularly sons, was considered a profound blessing and a vital means of perpetuating one's legacy, name, and inheritance. To be "alone," without "child nor brother," would signify a profound social, economic, and existential void. Wealth accumulation was intrinsically linked to the ability to provide for one's current family and to establish a secure future for descendants. Therefore, the concept of endless labor without an heir or family to share it with or pass it on to would have been culturally understood as deeply unsatisfying and ultimately purposeless. The accumulated wealth would likely dissipate or fall into the hands of strangers upon the individual's death, rendering the lifetime of toil meaningless.
  • Key Themes: Ecclesiastes 4:8 contributes significantly to several overarching themes that Qoheleth explores throughout the book. The most prominent is vanity (Hebrew: hebel), a central concept in Ecclesiastes, appearing over 30 times. It describes the fleeting, ephemeral, and ultimately unsatisfying nature of life and human endeavors when pursued in isolation from a divine perspective. This verse powerfully illustrates the concept of hebel by showing how even immense effort and material gain can be utterly void of lasting substance. The verse also underscores the theme of solitude and isolation, presenting it as a grievous state that negates the potential joy and purpose of labor. Furthermore, it highlights the futility of wealth accumulation for its own sake, demonstrating that material riches cannot fill the void of relational emptiness or provide true contentment. This insatiable desire for more, despite having no one to share it with, is a manifestation of the "striving after wind" that Qoheleth frequently laments, as seen in Ecclesiastes 1:14. The verse implicitly champions the theme of community and companionship, which is then explicitly praised in the verses that immediately follow, serving as a powerful counterpoint to the solitary toil.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • one (Hebrew, ʼechâd', H259): From a root meaning "united," this numeral here signifies singularity or being alone. In the context of Ecclesiastes 4:8, it emphasizes an individual who is utterly isolated, without a "second" or any family ties. This "oneness" is not a state of blessed solitude but a condition of profound loneliness and lack of relational connection, which renders all their labor ultimately meaningless and without enduring purpose.
  • vanity (Hebrew, hebel', H1892): This pivotal term in Ecclesiastes, derived from a root meaning "to breathe out," conveys emptiness, futility, or something transitory and unsatisfactory, like a vapor or breath. When applied to the solitary laborer's life, it signifies that despite all their effort and accumulation of riches, their existence lacks lasting substance, ultimate purpose, or genuine satisfaction. It is a life that, from an eternal perspective, amounts to nothing enduring.
  • travail (Hebrew, ʻinyân', H6045): This word denotes employment, business, or an affair, but in this context, especially when paired with "sore" (Hebrew, raʻ, meaning "bad" or "evil"), it refers to a burdensome, grievous, or oppressive task. The Preacher labels the solitary man's endless labor not just as futile, but as a "sore travail," highlighting the wearisome, painful, and ultimately unsatisfying nature of work pursued without relational purpose or divine perspective.

Verse Breakdown

  • "There is one [alone], and [there is] not a second; yea, he hath neither child nor brother:" This opening clause immediately establishes the profound isolation of the individual. "One alone" underscores their singularity, while "not a second" explicitly states the absence of a companion, partner, or even a close friend. The subsequent declaration, "neither child nor brother," further emphasizes a complete lack of familial ties—no descendants to inherit their wealth, and no siblings to share life's burdens or joys. This paints a stark picture of utter relational destitution, which is foundational to the verse's critique.
  • "yet [is there] no end of all his labour; neither is his eye satisfied with riches;" Despite this profound loneliness and the absence of anyone to benefit from their efforts, the individual's toil is relentless and unending. There is an insatiable drive to accumulate, yet paradoxically, their "eye is not satisfied with riches." This highlights the inherent inability of material possessions to bring true contentment or fill the relational and spiritual void within the human heart. The pursuit itself becomes a treadmill of endless striving, offering no final resting place or genuine fulfillment.
  • "neither [saith he], For whom do I labour, and bereave my soul of good?" This rhetorical question reveals the tragic blindness or denial of the solitary laborer. They do not pause to consider the ultimate purpose of their relentless work or the beneficiary of their efforts. The phrase "bereave my soul of good" implies that in their tireless pursuit of wealth, they are actively depriving themselves of true "good"—which could include rest, meaningful relationships, joy, spiritual well-being, or even simply enjoying the fruits of their labor. They are sacrificing genuine life for an unsatisfying accumulation.
  • "This [is] also vanity, yea, it [is] a sore travail." The Preacher's definitive and emphatic conclusion. He reiterates the overarching theme of "vanity," declaring this entire scenario to be utterly meaningless and without lasting value. The addition of "sore travail" further emphasizes the grievous, burdensome, and painful nature of such a life. It is not merely empty but actively oppressive, wearisome, and ultimately unsatisfying.

Literary Devices

Ecclesiastes 4:8 masterfully employs several literary devices to convey its somber and critical message. The verse is steeped in Irony, as the individual's relentless pursuit of wealth, typically associated with security and happiness, leads instead to profound emptiness and dissatisfaction. The very act of accumulating "riches" fails to "satisfy" the eye, creating a stark contrast between immense effort and a complete lack of fulfilling outcome. The phrase "no end of all his labour" can be seen as a form of Hyperbole, vividly emphasizing the ceaseless and ultimately futile nature of the work. The Rhetorical Question, "For whom do I labour, and bereave my soul of good?", serves to highlight the absurd lack of purpose in the solitary man's toil, prompting the reader to confront the same question in their own lives and motivations. Finally, the repeated declaration of "vanity" (Hebrew: hebel) is a form of Repetition that functions as a leitmotif throughout Ecclesiastes, powerfully underscoring the Preacher's central thesis about the ephemeral and meaningless nature of earthly pursuits when detached from a higher, divine purpose.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Ecclesiastes 4:8 serves as a profound theological statement on the inherent limitations and ultimate futility of human endeavor when pursued in isolation and without a transcendent purpose. It underscores the biblical truth that true satisfaction, meaning, and flourishing are not found in material accumulation or endless toil for self, but in relationships—both with God and with fellow human beings. The Preacher's lament over the solitary laborer highlights humanity's created need for community and shared experience, echoing the divine declaration in Genesis 2:18 that "It is not good that the man should be alone." The "sore travail" described is a direct consequence of a life misaligned with God's design for human flourishing, which includes fellowship, stewardship, and purpose beyond self-gratification. This verse implicitly champions the value of relational wealth over material wealth, aligning with broader biblical wisdom.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Ecclesiastes 4:8 stands as a timeless mirror, reflecting the potential emptiness of a life driven solely by ambition and material gain, especially when it leads to profound isolation. In a world that often glorifies relentless work, long hours, and wealth accumulation as the ultimate markers of success, this verse challenges us to pause and critically evaluate our own motivations and priorities. Are we pursuing riches for their own sake, or are our labors directed toward a higher purpose that includes God and others? The Preacher's poignant question, "For whom do I labour, and bereave my soul of good?", forces us to confront whether our striving is truly enriching our lives and the lives of those around us, or merely depleting our souls, relationships, and spiritual well-being. True "good" often lies not in what we accumulate, but in what we share, in the depth of our connections, and in the peace that comes from contentment and a life lived in service to God and neighbor. This verse calls us to prioritize relational wealth over material wealth, to seek satisfaction in God rather than in possessions, and to ensure our efforts contribute to a legacy of love, community, and divine purpose, not just personal gain or fleeting accumulation.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what ways might my own pursuits of success or security be inadvertently leading to isolation or a lack of true satisfaction?
  • How can I intentionally cultivate relationships and community to counteract the tendency towards solitary striving in my life?
  • What does it truly mean for my "eye to be satisfied with riches," and how can I reorient my desires towards lasting contentment and spiritual fulfillment?
  • For whom am I truly laboring, and am I "bereaving my soul of good" in the process of my daily striving?

FAQ

What does "vanity" truly mean in Ecclesiastes, and how does it apply to Ecclesiastes 4:8?

Answer: In Ecclesiastes, the Hebrew word for "vanity" is hebel (H1892), which literally means "breath," "vapor," or "something fleeting." It conveys the idea of emptiness, futility, or meaninglessness. It doesn't necessarily imply evil, but rather that which is ephemeral, unsubstantial, or ultimately unsatisfying when viewed from a purely earthly perspective ("under the sun"). In Ecclesiastes 4:8, the solitary laborer's endless toil and accumulation of wealth are deemed "vanity" because, despite the immense effort, there is no lasting purpose or fulfillment. Without anyone to share with or pass on an inheritance to, the riches become an empty pursuit, like chasing after wind, offering no true or enduring satisfaction.

Why is having "no second" or "neither child nor brother" so significant in this verse?

Answer: In ancient Near Eastern culture, family and community were paramount to an individual's identity, security, and legacy. To be "one alone" without a "second" (a companion, partner, or close friend) or "neither child nor brother" (no direct heirs or close family members) signified a profound lack of social and familial support, continuity, and purpose. Children, especially sons, were crucial for carrying on the family name and inheriting property, ensuring that the fruits of one's labor would benefit future generations. Without them, an individual's accumulated wealth and lifetime of toil would have no lasting impact beyond their own death. This relational void makes the endless pursuit of riches utterly meaningless, as there is no one to share life's journey with or to whom the fruits of labor can be bequeathed. The Preacher contrasts this with the profound benefits of companionship in Ecclesiastes 4:9-12, emphasizing that "two are better than one."

How does Ecclesiastes 4:8 relate to modern work culture and the pursuit of wealth?

Answer: Ecclesiastes 4:8 remains profoundly relevant to modern work culture, which often incentivizes relentless labor, long hours, and the accumulation of wealth as primary indicators of success. The verse serves as a timeless warning against the dangers of becoming so consumed by work and financial gain that one neglects relationships, personal well-being, and a sense of ultimate purpose. Many today can relate to the feeling of "no end of all his labour" or the experience of an "eye not satisfied with riches," constantly striving for more without finding true contentment. The verse challenges the pervasive notion that material success alone can bring happiness, reminding us that true fulfillment often comes from meaningful connections, shared experiences, and a life lived with purpose beyond mere accumulation, echoing the sentiment found in Matthew 6:19-21. It calls us to seek a balance that prioritizes spiritual and relational wealth alongside material provision.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Ecclesiastes 4:8 lays bare the profound emptiness and grievous toil of a life lived in isolation, consumed by endless labor and the pursuit of fleeting riches—a life "under the sun" without ultimate purpose or lasting satisfaction. This lament finds its ultimate answer and fulfillment in Jesus Christ. Where the solitary laborer finds "no second," Christ offers Himself as the faithful friend who sticks closer than a brother (Proverbs 18:24). He is the one who gathers those who were "alone" into a new family, the Church, where believers are adopted as sons and daughters of God and become brothers and sisters in Christ (Ephesians 2:19). The "no end of all his labour" and the "eye not satisfied with riches" are directly addressed by Christ, who teaches us to lay up treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys (Matthew 6:19-20), and promises a satisfaction that the world cannot give, a living water that quenches all thirst (John 4:14). He Himself labored perfectly, not for earthly gain, but to secure an eternal inheritance for His people (Hebrews 9:15). In Christ, the "vanity" of life's toil is transformed into purposeful service for His kingdom, and the "sore travail" is redeemed by the promise of eternal rest and joy in His presence, where those who die in the Lord find blessed cessation from their labors (Revelation 14:13). He provides the ultimate "good" that the solitary soul bereaves itself of, offering abundant life (John 10:10) and the true satisfaction that only comes from knowing, serving, and being in fellowship with Him.

Copy as

Commentary on Ecclesiastes 4 verses 7–12

Here Solomon fastens upon another instance of the vanity of this world, that frequently the more men have of it the more they would have; and on this they are so intent that they have no enjoyment of what they have. Now Solomon here shows,

I. That selfishness is the cause of this evil (Ecc 4:7, Ecc 4:8): There is one alone, that minds none but himself, cares for nobody, but would, if he could, be placed alone in the midst of the earth; there is not a second, nor does he desire there should be: one mouth he thinks enough in a house, and grudges every thing that goes beside him. See how this covetous muckworm is here described. 1. He makes himself a mere slave to his business. Though he has no charge, neither child nor brother, none to take care of but himself, none to hang upon him, or draw from him, no poor relations, nor dares he marry, for fear of the expense of a family, yet is there no end of his labour; he is at it night and day, early and late, and will scarcely allow necessary rest to himself and those he employs. He does not confine himself within the bounds of his own calling, but is for having a hand in any thing that he can get by. See Psa 127:2. 2. He never thinks he has enough: His eye is not satisfied with riches. Covetousness is called the lust of the eye (Jo1 2:16) because the beholding of it with his eyes is all that the worldling seems to covet, Ecc 5:11. He has enough for his back (as bishop Reynolds observes), for his belly, for his calling, for his family, for his living decently in the world, but he has not enough for his eyes. Though he can but see it, can but count his money, and not find in his heart to use it, yet he is not easy because he has not more to regale his eyes with. 3. He denies himself the comfort of what he has: he bereaves his soul of good. If our souls are bereaved of good, it is we ourselves that do bereave them. Others may bereave us of outward good, but cannot rob us of our graces and comforts, our spiritual good things. It is our own fault if we do not enjoy ourselves. Yet many are so set upon the world that, in pursuit of it, they bereave their souls of good here and for ever, make shipwreck of faith and of a good conscience, bereave themselves not only of the favour of God and eternal life, but of the pleasures of this world too and this present life. Worldly people, pretending to be wise for themselves, are really enemies to themselves. 4. He has no excuse for doing this: He has neither child nor brother, none that he is bound to, on whom he may lay out what he has to his satisfaction while he lives, none that he has a kindness for, for whom he may lay it up to his satisfaction and to whom he may leave it when he dies, none that are poor or dear to him. 5. He has not consideration enough to show himself the folly of this. He never puts this question to himself, "For whom do I labour thus? Do I labour, as I should, for the glory of God, and that I may have to give to those that need? Do I consider that it is but for the body that I am labouring, a dying body; it is for others, and I know not for whom - perhaps for a fool, that will scatter it as fast as I have gathered it - perhaps for a foe, that will be ungrateful to my memory?" Note, It is wisdom for those that take pains about this world to consider whom they take all this pains for, and whether it be really worth while to bereave themselves of good that they may bestow it on a stranger. If men do not consider this, it is vanity, and a sore travail; they shame and vex themselves to no purpose.

II. That sociableness is the cure of this evil. Men are thus sordid because they are all for themselves. Now Solomon shows here, by divers instances, that it is not good for man to be alone (Gen 2:18); he designs hereby to recommend to us both marriage and friendship, two things which covetous misers decline, because of the charge of them; but such are the comfort and advantage of them both, if prudently contracted, that they will very well quit cost. Man, in paradise itself, could not be happy without a mate, and therefore is no sooner made than matched. 1. Solomon lays this down for a truth, That two are better than one, and more happy jointly than either of them could be separately, more pleased in one another than they could be in themselves only, mutually serviceable to each other's welfare, and by a united strength more likely to do good to others: They have a good reward of their labour; whatever service they do, it is returned to them another way. He that serves himself only has himself only for his paymaster, and commonly proves more unjust and ungrateful to himself than his friend, if he should serve him, would be to him; witness him that labours endlessly and yet bereaves his soul of good; he has no reward of his labour. But he that is kind to another has a good reward; the pleasure and advantage of holy love will be an abundant recompence for all the work and labour of love. Hence Solomon infers the mischief of solitude: Woe to him that is alone. He lies exposed to many temptations which good company and friendship would prevent and help him to guard against; he wants that advantage which a man has by the countenance of his friend, as iron has of being sharpened by iron. A monastic life then was surely never intended for a state of perfection, nor should those be reckoned the greatest lovers of God who cannot find in their hearts to love any one else. 2. He proves it by divers instances of the benefit of friendship and good conversation. (1.) Occasional succour in an exigency. It is good for two to travel together, for if one happen to fall, he may be lost for want of a little help. If a man fall into sin, his friend will help to restore him with the spirit of meekness; if he fall into trouble, his friend will help to comfort him and assuage his grief. (2.) Mutual warmth. As a fellow-traveller is of use (amicus pro vehiculo - a friend is a good substitute for a carriage) so is a bedfellow: If two lie together, they have heat. So virtuous and gracious affections are excited by good society, and Christians warm one another by provoking one another to love and to good works. (3.) United strength. If an enemy find a man alone, he is likely to prevail against him; with his own single strength he cannot make his part good, but, if he have a second, he may do well enough: two shall withstand him. "You shall help me against my enemy, and I will help you against yours;" according to the agreement between Joab and Abishai (Sa2 10:11), and so both are conquerors; whereas, acting separately, both would have been conquered; as was said of the ancient Britons, when the Romans invaded them, Dum singuli pugnant, universi vincuntur - While they fight in detached parties, they sacrifice the general cause. In our spiritual warfare we may be helpful to one another as well as in our spiritual work; next to the comfort of communion with God, is that of the communion of saints. He concludes with this proverb, A threefold cord is not easily broken, any more than a bundle of arrows, though each single thread, and each single arrow, is. Two together he compares to a threefold cord; for where two are closely joined in holy love and fellowship, Christ will by his Spirit come to them, and make the third, as he joined himself to the two disciples going to Emmaus, and then there is a threefold cord that can never be broken. They that dwell in love, dwell in God, and God in them.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 7–12. Public domain.
Copy as
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Ecclesiastes
"Then I
returned and contemplated futility beneath the sun: a lone and solitary man who
has neither son nor brother, yet there is no end to his toil, nor is his eye
ever sated with riches, nor does he ask himself, 'For whom am I toiling and
depriving myself of goodness.' This too
is futility, indeed, it is a sorry task." I turned to
other people and I saw that they work more than is necessary and amass wealth
by good and bad means and do not use it once accumulated; they have all things,
brood over their riches, keep it for another, and do not enjoy their work. Then at the end of their life they have
neither son nor brother, nor close friend so that the pious work seems reserved
for necessities only. And so I
discovered nothing more vain than that man, who collects riches, or to whom an
ignorant man bequeaths them. We are even
able to understand this in a religious interpretation, and understand it as
those, who write books and leave them to fastidious readers. Some say that this passage from where it says
"there is one, but there is not a second" is about the Saviour,
because he came down to save the world alone and without any companion. And although there are many sons of God, they
are called his brothers by adoption, though not one remains worthy, who should
be joined to him in this work. There is
no end to this work, for those carrying our faults and sins and suffering for
us; and his eye will not be filled by riches, but always with those desiring
our safety, and the more you see his sins, the more he encourages him to
repent.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Ecclesiastes 4:8 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.