Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
This image's head was of fine gold, his breast and his arms of silver, his belly and his thighs of brass,
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
This image's H6755 head H7217 was of fine H2869 gold H1722, his breast H2306 and his arms H1872 of silver H3702, his belly H4577 and his thighs H3410 of brass H5174,
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The head of the statue was of fine gold, its chest and arms of silver, its trunk and thighs of bronze,
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
The head of the statue was pure gold, its chest and arms were silver, its belly and thighs were bronze,
Ask
American Standard Version
As for this image, its head was of fine gold, its breast and its arms of silver, its belly and its thighs of brass,
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
As for this image, its head was of fine gold, its breast and its arms of silver, its belly and its thighs of brass,
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
This images head was of fine golde, his breast and his armes of siluer, his bellie and his thighs of brasse,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
This image! its head is of good gold, its breasts and its arms of silver, its belly and its thighs of brass;
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Daniel 2:32 is a pivotal verse within King Nebuchadnezzar's divinely inspired dream, as interpreted by the prophet Daniel. This verse meticulously describes the upper portions of a colossal statue: a head of fine gold, a breast and arms of silver, and a belly and thighs of brass. Each metallic section symbolically represents a successive world empire destined to rise and fall throughout history, thereby unveiling God's precise and sovereign blueprint for the ages and establishing a foundational prophetic timeline that culminates in an eternal kingdom.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is an integral and descriptive component of Daniel's divinely revealed interpretation of King Nebuchadnezzar's disturbing dream. It follows the initial general description of the terrifying image in Daniel 2:31 and precedes Daniel's explicit identification of the empires in verses like Daniel 2:36-43. The broader narrative arc of Daniel 2 sets the stage with the king's forgotten dream and his demand for his wise men to both reveal and interpret it—a task that only Daniel, empowered by God's direct revelation (Daniel 2:19-23), could accomplish. Thus, Daniel 2:32 serves as a crucial descriptive element within this unfolding prophetic revelation, meticulously detailing the statue's composition before the specific identification of the empires.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The events of Daniel 2 are situated during the zenith of the Neo-Babylonian Empire, specifically under the reign of King Nebuchadnezzar II (605-562 BC), who had conquered Judah and deported many of its inhabitants, including Daniel, into exile. In the ancient Near East, dreams were frequently regarded as significant divine or ominous messages, and monarchs routinely consulted various interpreters, magicians, and astrologers for their meaning. Babylon itself was renowned for its immense wealth and its lavish use of gold in its architecture and adornment—a fact that makes the "head of gold" an exceptionally fitting symbol for Nebuchadnezzar's empire. The dream's focus on successive empires accurately reflects the geopolitical realities of the era, characterized by powerful kingdoms constantly vying for dominance. However, the prophecy transcends the immediate historical horizon, projecting far into the future, demonstrating God's foreknowledge and control over all historical epochs.
  • Key Themes: Daniel 2:32 contributes significantly to several overarching themes within the book of Daniel and biblical prophecy. Firstly, it powerfully illustrates the Succession of Empires, depicting a divinely ordained sequence of world powers that would dominate history, commencing with Babylon. Secondly, the progressive change in metals—from gold to silver to brass—highlights the theme of Decreasing Glory and Value among these earthly kingdoms. While each empire is powerful, there is a symbolic decline in inherent worth, unity, or perhaps even moral quality from one to the next, foreshadowing their eventual fragmentation. Most profoundly, this verse, as an integral part of the larger dream, underscores the Divine Sovereignty of God over human history and political affairs. It demonstrates that God "removeth kings, and setteth up kings" (as declared in Daniel 2:21), revealing His absolute control over the rise and fall of nations and His unfolding plan for humanity, which ultimately culminates in the establishment of an eternal kingdom. This divine oversight provides a powerful counterpoint to human ambition and perceived control, as seen in Nebuchadnezzar's initial pride (Daniel 4:30).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Image (Aramaic, tselem', H6755): This Aramaic term refers to a sculpted figure, a likeness, or a representation. In Nebuchadnezzar's dream, it describes the colossal statue that serves as a divinely inspired, composite symbol of a sequence of human kingdoms and their distinct characteristics, rather than an object of worship itself. Its imposing nature reflects the grandeur, power, and often the idolatrous self-exaltation of the earthly empires it represents.
  • Gold (Aramaic, dᵉhab', H1722): Corresponding to the Hebrew 'zahab,' this denotes the most precious, valuable, and pure of metals. As the material for the head of the image, it symbolizes the initial, most glorious, and arguably most absolute empire in the prophetic sequence, characterized by immense wealth, singular authority, and unparalleled dominion, specifically identifying with Nebuchadnezzar's Babylon.
  • Brass (Aramaic, nᵉchâsh', H5174): Corresponding to the Hebrew 'nechushah,' this term refers to copper or bronze. Its use for the belly and thighs signifies a kingdom that, while powerful and expansive, is of lesser inherent value than gold or silver. Historically, bronze was widely used for weaponry and armor, aptly representing a kingdom known for its formidable military might, swift conquests, and extensive territorial reach.

Verse Breakdown

  • "This image's head [was] of fine gold": This clause describes the uppermost and most valuable part of the statue. In Daniel's subsequent interpretation, this "head of gold" explicitly represents King Nebuchadnezzar and his Neo-Babylonian Empire (c. 605-539 BC). The choice of gold signifies Babylon's unparalleled wealth, absolute power, and the autocratic, centralized nature of Nebuchadnezzar's rule, which was considered the pinnacle of earthly glory and dominion at that time.
  • "his breast and his arms of silver": This section introduces the next tier of the statue, composed of silver, a metal inherently less valuable than gold. This part of the image symbolizes the Medo-Persian Empire (c. 539-331 BC), which famously conquered Babylon. The "breast and arms" are often interpreted as representing the dual nature of this empire, formed by the powerful union of the Medes and the Persians. The silver denotes a kingdom that, while vast and powerful, was of lesser glory or perhaps more federated and less absolutely centralized compared to its golden predecessor, possibly due to its reliance on a more complex administrative and tribute system.
  • "his belly and his thighs of brass": This final clause in the verse describes the middle section of the statue, composed of brass (bronze). This portion represents the Grecian Empire (c. 331-168 BC), famously led by Alexander the Great. Brass, though less precious than silver, was renowned for its strength, durability, and widespread use in weaponry and armor. This aptly symbolizes the Grecian Empire's remarkable military prowess, its swift and far-reaching conquests, and its extensive territorial dominion across the known world, characterized by rapid expansion and formidable military might.

Literary Devices

Daniel 2:32 makes rich use of Symbolism, where the various metals (gold, silver, brass) are not merely descriptive but serve as powerful representations of successive world empires. The entire statue functions as an extended Metaphor, with each distinct part of the human-like figure standing in for a specific kingdom. There is a clear Progression or Degradation evident in the choice of metals, moving from the most precious (gold) to less valuable ones (silver, brass). This visual progression powerfully communicates a decline in the inherent glory, absolute power, or perhaps even the moral quality and unity of the empires as they succeed one another. This progression also subtly hints at a shift in the nature of these empires, from the centralized autocracy of Babylon to the dual nature of Medo-Persia and the widespread, militarily dominant Greek empire, setting the stage for further fragmentation.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Daniel 2:32, as an integral part of the larger prophetic dream, profoundly underscores the transient nature of human power and the enduring, immutable sovereignty of God. It reveals that the rise and fall of empires are not random occurrences or merely the result of human ambition, but are part of a divinely orchestrated, meticulously planned historical sequence. This prophecy provides a cosmic perspective on history, assuring believers that despite the apparent chaos, shifting allegiances, and tumultuous events of earthly kingdoms, a divine hand is meticulously guiding events towards a predetermined, ultimate end. It powerfully challenges the notion that human rulers or systems hold ultimate authority, redirecting focus to the one true King who establishes and removes them. The decreasing value of the metals also subtly suggests that human history, left to its own devices, tends towards fragmentation and decay, setting the stage for the introduction of an entirely different, eternal kingdom that will not be of human origin.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The detailed prophetic vision in Daniel 2:32 offers profound comfort and a robust framework for understanding God's active and sovereign involvement in human history. In a world often characterized by political instability, the rise and fall of nations, and the seemingly arbitrary exercise of power, this verse serves as a powerful reminder that there is an ultimate, divine orchestrator behind all events. It calls us to place our trust not in fleeting earthly powers, no matter how glorious or mighty they appear, but in the unchanging, omnipotent God who holds the destiny of all kingdoms in His hands. This divine perspective encourages believers to live with an eternal outlook, recognizing that our ultimate allegiance and hope lie beyond the temporary structures of this world. Such a realization fosters resilience, peace, and unwavering faith amidst global turmoil, prompting us to invest our lives in what truly endures.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does Daniel 2:32 challenge our contemporary perception of earthly power, stability, and the permanence of human institutions?
  • In what specific ways does this prophecy encourage a deeper trust in God's ultimate plan, even when faced with global turmoil and significant political shifts?
  • What implications does the "decreasing glory" of the metals have for our personal values and pursuits, prompting us to invest in what is eternal rather than merely temporal?

FAQ

Why are there different metals for different parts of the statue?

Answer: The different metals—gold, silver, and brass (bronze)—symbolize a succession of distinct world empires that would dominate history after Nebuchadnezzar's Babylon. The decreasing value of the metals from the head downwards (gold being most precious, then silver, then brass) signifies a decline in the absolute power, unity, or perhaps even the inherent glory of each successive kingdom compared to its predecessor. This visual progression illustrates a divinely ordained historical sequence, revealing God's foreknowledge and control over the rise and fall of nations.

What specific empires do the gold, silver, and brass represent?

Answer: The "head of fine gold" explicitly represents the Neo-Babylonian Empire (c. 605-539 BC), under King Nebuchadnezzar himself, as confirmed in Daniel 2:38. The "breast and arms of silver" symbolize the Medo-Persian Empire (c. 539-331 BC), which conquered Babylon. The "belly and thighs of brass" point to the Grecian Empire (c. 331-168 BC), led by Alexander the Great, known for its extensive military conquests and widespread dominion, as further elaborated in Daniel 8:21.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While Daniel 2:32 vividly describes the transient nature of human empires, its ultimate Christ-centered fulfillment is found in the profound contrast between these temporary kingdoms and the eternal, unshakable kingdom established by God Himself. The dream culminates not in the feet of iron and clay, but in a "stone cut out without hands" (as described in Daniel 2:34) that strikes the image at its feet, utterly demolishing it, and then becomes a great mountain filling the whole earth (as prophesied in Daniel 2:35). This miraculous stone is universally understood to represent Jesus Christ and His everlasting kingdom, which "shall never be destroyed" (a promise given in Daniel 2:44). Unlike the empires of gold, silver, and brass, which are characterized by their eventual decline, division, and dissolution, Christ's kingdom is one of enduring righteousness, peace, and unshakeable dominion. He is the true King of kings and Lord of lords (Revelation 19:16), whose dominion is an "everlasting dominion which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed" (as declared in Daniel 7:14). The prophecy of Daniel 2:32, therefore, serves as a powerful historical backdrop, highlighting the inherent futility and impermanence of human ambition, and gloriously foreshadowing the permanent, triumphant reign of the Messiah, who alone brings true and lasting dominion.

Copy as

Commentary on Daniel 2 verses 31–45

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Daniel here gives full satisfaction to Nebuchadnezzar concerning his dream and the interpretation of it. That great prince had been kind to this poor prophet in his maintenance and education; he had been brought up at the king's cost, preferred at court, and the land of his captivity had hereby been made much easier to him than to others of his brethren. And now the king is abundantly repaid for all the expense he had been at upon him; and for receiving this prophet, though not in the name of a prophet, he had a prophet's reward, such a reward as a prophet only could give, and for which that wealthy mighty prince was now glad to be beholden to him. Here is,

I. The dream itself, Dan 2:31, Dan 2:45. Nebuchadnezzar perhaps was an admirer of statues, and had his palace and gardens adorned with them; however, he was a worshipper of images, and now behold a great image is set before him in a dream, which might intimate to him what the images were which he bestowed so much cost upon, and paid such respect to; they were mere dreams. The creatures of fancy might do as well to please the fancy. By the power of imagination he might shut his eyes, and represent to himself what forms he thought fit, and beautify them at his pleasure, without the expense and trouble of sculpture. This was the image of a man erect: It stood before him, as a living man; and, because those monarchies which were designed to be represented by it were admirable in the eyes of their friends, the brightness of this image was excellent; and because they were formidable to their enemies, and dreaded by all about them, the form of this image is said to be terrible; both the features of the face and the postures of the body made it so. But that which was most remarkable in this image was the different metals of which it was composed - the head of gold (the richest and most durable metal), the breast and arms of silver (the next to it in worth), the belly and sides (or thighs) of brass, the legs of iron (still baser metals), and lastly the feet part of iron and part of clay. See what the things of this world are; the further we go in them the less valuable they appear. In the life of a man youth is a head of gold, but it grows less and less worthy of our esteem; and old age is half clay; a man is then as good as dead. It is so with the world; later ages degenerate. The first age of the Christian church, of the reformation, was a head of gold; but we live in an age that is iron and clay. Some allude to this in the description of a hypocrite, whose practice is not agreeable to his knowledge. He has a head of gold, but feet of iron and clay: he knows his duty, but does it not. Some observe that in Daniel's visions the monarchies were represented by four beasts (ch. 7), for he looked upon that wisdom from beneath, by which they were turned to be earthly and sensual, and a tyrannical power, to have more in it of the beast than of the man, and so the vision agreed with his notions of the thing. But to Nebuchadnezzar, a heathen prince, they were represented by a gay and pompous image of a man, for he was an admirer of the kingdoms of this world and the glory of them. To him the sight was so charming that he was impatient to see it again. But what became of this image? The next part of the dream shows it to us calcined, and brought to nothing. He saw a stone cut out of the quarry by an unseen power, without hands, and this stone fell upon the feet of the image, that were of iron and clay, and broke them to pieces; and then the image must fall of course, and so the gold, and silver, and brass, and iron, were all broken to pieces together, and beaten so small that they became like the chaff of the summer threshing-floors, and there were not to be found any the least remains of them; but the stone cut out of the mountain became itself a great mountain, and filled the earth. See how God can bring about great effects by weak and unlikely causes; when he pleases a little one shall become a thousand. Perhaps the destruction of this image of gold, and silver, and brass, and iron, might be intended to signify the abolishing of idolatry out of the world in due time. The idols of the heathen are silver and gold, as this image was, and they shall perish from off the earth and from under these heavens, Jer 10:11.; Isa 2:18. And whatever power destroys idolatry is in the ready way to magnify and exalt itself, as this stone, when it had broken the image to pieces, became a great mountain.

II. The interpretation of this dream. Let us now see what is the meaning of this. It was from God, and therefore from him it is fit that we take the explication of it. It should seem, Daniel had his fellows with him, and speaks for them as well as for himself, when he says, We will tell the interpretation, Dan 2:36. Now,

1.This image represented the kingdoms of the earth that should successively bear rule among the nations and have influence on the affairs of the Jewish church. The four monarchies were not represented by four distinct statues, but by one image, because they were all of one and the same spirit and genius, and all more or less against the church. It was the same power, only lodged in four different nations, the two former lying eastward of Judea, the two latter westward. (1.) The head of gold signified the Chaldean monarchy, which was now in being (Dan 2:37, Dan 2:38): Thou, O king! art (or rather, shalt be) a king of kings, a universal monarch, to whom many kings and kingdoms shall be tributaries; or, Thou art the highest of kings on earth at this time (as a servant of servants is the meanest servant); thou dost outshine all other kings. But let him not attribute his elevation to his own politics or fortitude. No; it is the God of heaven that has given thee a kingdom, power, and strength, and glory, a kingdom that exercises great authority, stands firmly, and shines brightly, acts by a puissant army with an arbitrary power. Note, The greatest of princes have no power but what is given them from above. The extent of his dominion is set forth (Dan 2:38), that wheresoever the children of men dwell, in all the nations of that part of the world, he was ruler over them all, over them and all that belonged to them, all their cattle, not only those which they had a property in, but those that were ferae naturae - wild, the beasts of the field and the fowls of the heaven. He was lord of all the woods, forests, and chases, and none were allowed to hunt or fowl without his leave. Thus "thou art the head of gold; thou, and thy son, and thy son's son, for seventy years." Compare this with Jer 25:9, Jer 25:11, especially Jer 27:5-7. There were other powerful kingdoms in the world at this time, as that of the Scythians; but it was the kingdom of Babylon that reigned over the Jews, and that began the government which continued in the succession here described till Christ's time. It is called a head, for its wisdom, eminency, and absolute power, a head of gold for its wealth (Isa 14:4); it was a golden city. Some make this monarchy to begin in Nimrod, and so bring into it all the Assyrian kings, about fifty monarchs in all, and compute that it lasted above 1600 years. But it had not been so long a monarchy of such vast extent and power as is here described, nor any thing like it; therefore others make only Nebuchadnezzar, Evil-merodach, and Belshazzar, to belong to this head of gold; and a glorious high throne they had, and perhaps exercised a more despotic power than any of the kings that went before them. Nebuchadnezzar reigned forty-five years current, Evil-merodach twenty-three years current, and Belshazzar three. Babylon was their metropolis, and Daniel was with them upon the spot during the seventy years. (2.) The breast and arms of silver signified the monarchy of the Medes and Persians, of which the king is told no more than this, There shall arise another kingdom inferior to thee (Dan 2:39), not so rich, powerful, or victorious. This kingdom was founded by Darius the Mede and Cyrus the Persian, in alliance with each other, and therefore represented by two arms, meeting in the breast. Cyrus was himself a Persian by his father, a Mede by his mother. Some reckon that this second monarchy lasted 130 years, others 204 years. The former computation agrees best with the scripture chronology. (3.) The belly and thighs of brass signified the monarchy of the Grecians, founded by Alexander, who conquered Darius Codomannus, the last of the Persian emperors. This is the third kingdom, of brass, inferior in wealth and extent of dominion to the Persian monarchy, but in Alexander himself it shall by the power of the sword bear rule over all the earth; for Alexander boasted that he had conquered the world, and then sat down and wept because he had not another world to conquer. (4.) The legs and feet of iron signified the Roman monarchy. Some make this to signify the latter part of the Grecian monarchy, the two empires of Syria and Egypt, the former governed by the family of the Seleucidae, from Seleucus, the latter by that of the Lagidae, from Ptolemaeus Lagus; these they make the two legs and feet of this image: Grotius, and Junius, and Broughton, go this way. But it has been the more received opinion that it is the Roman monarchy that is here intended, because it was in the time of that monarchy, and when it was at its height, that the kingdom of Christ was set up in the world by the preaching of the everlasting gospel. The Roman kingdom was strong as iron (Dan 2:40), witness the prevalency of that kingdom against all that contended with it for many ages. That kingdom broke in pieces the Grecian empire and afterwards quite destroyed the nation of the Jews. Towards the latter end of the Roman monarchy it grew very weak, and branched into ten kingdoms, which were as the toes of these feet. Some of these were weak as clay, others strong as iron, Dan 2:42. Endeavours were used to unite and cement them for the strengthening of the empire, but in vain: They shall not cleave one to another, Dan 2:43. This empire divided the government for a long time between the senate and the people, the nobles and the commons, but they did not entirely coalesce. There were civil wars between Marius and Sylla, Caesar and Pompey, whose parties were as iron and clay. Some refer this to the declining times of that empire, when, for the strengthening of the empire against the irruptions of the barbarous nations, the branches of the royal family intermarried; but the politics had not the desired effect, when the day of the fall of that empire came.

2.The stone cut out without hands represented the kingdom of Jesus Christ, which should be set up in the world in the time of the Roman empire, and upon the ruins of Satan's kingdom in the kingdoms of the world. This is the stone cut out of the mountain without hands, for it should be neither raised nor supported by human power or policy; no visible hand should act in the setting of it up, but it should be done invisibly the Spirit of the Lord of hosts. This was the stone which the builders refused, because it was not cut out by their hands, but it has now become the head-stone of the corner. (1.) The gospel-church is a kingdom, which Christ is the sole and sovereign monarch of, in which he rules by his word and Spirit, to which he gives protection and law, and from which he receives homage and tribute. It is a kingdom not of this world, and yet set up in it; it is the kingdom of God among men. (2.) The God of heaven was to set up this kingdom, to give authority to Christ to execute judgment, to set him as King upon his holy hill of Zion, and to bring into obedience to him a willing people. Being set up by the God of heaven, it is often in the New Testament called the kingdom of heaven, for its original is from above and its tendency is upwards. (3.) It was to be set up in the days of these kings, the kings of the fourth monarchy, of which particular notice is taken (Luk 2:1), That Christ was born when, by the decree of the emperor of Rome, all the world was taxed, which was a plain indication that that empire had become as universal as any earthly empire ever was. When these kings are contesting with each other, and in all the struggles each of the contending parties hopes to find its own account, God will do his own work and fulfil his own counsels. These kings are all enemies to Christ's kingdom, and yet it shall be set up in defiance of them. (4.) It is a kingdom that knows no decay, is in no danger of destruction, and will not admit any succession or revolution. It shall never be destroyed by any foreign force invading it, as many other kingdoms are; fire and sword cannot waste it; the combined powers of earth and hell cannot deprive either the subjects of their prince or the prince of his subjects; nor shall this kingdom be left to other people, as the kingdoms of the earth are. As Christ is a monarch that has no successor (for he himself shall reign for ever), so his kingdom is a monarchy that has no revolution. The kingdom of God was indeed taken from the Jews and given to the Gentiles (Mat 21:43), but still it was Christianity that ruled, the kingdom of the Messiah. The Christian church is still the same; it is fixed on a rock, much fought against, but never to be prevailed against, by the gates of hell. (5.) It is a kingdom that shall be victorious over all opposition. It shall break in pieces and consume all those kingdoms, as the stone cut out of the mountain without hands broke in pieces the image, Dan 2:44, Dan 2:45. The kingdom of Christ shall wear out all other kingdoms, shall outlive them, and flourish when they are sunk with their own weight, and so wasted that their place knows them no more. All the kingdoms that appear against the kingdom of Christ shall be broken with a rod of iron, as a potter's vessel, Psa 2:9. And in the kingdoms that submit to the kingdom of Christ tyranny, and idolatry, and every thing that is their reproach, shall, as far as the gospel of Christ gets ground, be broken. The day is coming when Jesus Christ shall have put down all rule, principality, and power, and have made all his enemies his footstool; and then this prophecy will have its full accomplishment, and not till then, Co1 15:24, Co1 15:25. Our savior seems to refer to this (Mat 21:44), when, speaking of himself as the stone set at nought by the Jewish builders, he says, On whomsoever this stone shall fall, it will grind him to powder. (6.) It shall be an everlasting kingdom. Those kingdoms of the earth that had broken in pieces all about them at length came, in their turn, to be in like manner broken; but the kingdom of Christ shall break other kingdoms in pieces and shall itself stand for ever. His throne shall be as the days of heaven, his seed, his subjects, as the stars of heaven, not only so innumerable, but so immutable. Of the increase of Christ's government and peace there shall be no end. The Lord shall reign for ever, not only to the end of time, but when time and days shall be no more, and God shall be all in all to eternity.

III. Daniel having thus interpreted the dream, to the satisfaction of Nebuchadnezzar, who gave him no interruption, so full was the interpretation that he had no question to ask, and so plain that he had no objection to make, he closes all with a solemn assertion, 1. Of the divine original of this dream: The great God (so he calls him, to express his own high thoughts of him, and to beget the like in the mind of this great king) has made known to the king what shall come to pass hereafter, which the gods of the magicians could not do. And thus a full confirmation was given to that great argument which Isaiah had long before urged against idolaters, and particularly the idolaters of Babylon, when he challenged the gods they worshipped to show things that are to come hereafter, that we may know that you are gods (Isa 41:23), and by this proved the God of Israel to be the true God, that he declares the end from the beginning, Isa 46:10. 2. Of the undoubted certainty of the things foretold by this dream. He who makes known these things is the same that has himself designed and determined them, and will by his providence effect them; and we are sure that his counsel shall stand, and cannot be altered, and therefore the dream is certain and the interpretation thereof sure. Note, Whatever God has made known we may depend upon.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 31–45. Public domain.
Copy as
Hippolytus of RomeAD 235
Hippolytus Exegetical Fragments - Scholia on Daniel
"Thou sawest," etc. Apollinaris on this: He looked, and behold, as it were, an image. For it did not appear to him as an actual object, presented to the view of an onlooker, but as an image or semblance. And while it contains in it many things together, that is in such a way that it is not really one, but manifold. For it comprised a summary of all kingdoms; and its exceeding splendour was on account of the glory of the kings, and its terrible appearance on account of their power. Eusebius Pumphili, and Hippolytus the most holy bishop of Rome, compare the dream of Nebuchadnezzar now in question with the vision of the prophet Daniel. Since these have given a different interpretation of this vision now before us in their expositions, I deemed it necessary to transcribe what is said by Eusebius of Caesarea, who bears the surname Pamphili, in the 15th book of his Gospel Demonstration; for he expounds the whole vision in these terms: "I think that this (i.e., the vision of Nebuchadnezzar) differs in nothing from the vision of the prophet. For as the prophet saw a great sea, so the king saw a great image. And again, as the prophet saw four beasts, which he interpreted as four kingdoms, so the king was given to understand four kingdoms under the gold, and silver, and brass, and iron. And again, as the prophet saw the division of the ten horns of the last beast, and three horns broken by one; so the king, in like manner, saw in the extremities of the image one part iron and another clay. And besides this, as the prophet, after the vision of the four kingdoms, saw the Son of man receive dominion, and power, and a kingdom; so also the king thought he saw a stone smite the whole image, and become a great mountain and fill the sea. And rightly so. For it was quite consistent in the king, whose view of the spectacle of life was so false, and who admired the beauty of the mere sensible colours, so to speak, in the picture set up to view, to liken the life of all men to a great image; but (it became) the prophet to compare the great and mighty tumult of life to a mighty sea. And it was fitting that the king, who prized the substances deemed precious among men, gold, and silver, and brass, and iron, should liken to these substances the kingdoms that held the sovereignty at different times in the life of men; but that the prophet should describe these same kingdoms under the likeness of beasts, in accordance with the manner of their rule. And again, the king-who was puffed up, as it seems, in his own conceit, and plumed himself on the power of his ancestors-is shown the vicissitude to which affairs are subject, and the end destined for all the kingdoms of earth, with the view of teaching him to lay aside his pride in himself, and understand that there is nothing stable among men, but only that which is the appointed end of all things-the kingdom of God. For after the first kingdom of the Assyrians, which was denoted by the gold, there will be the second kingdom of the Persians, expressed by the silver; and then the third kingdom of the Macedonians, signified by the brass; and after it, the fourth kingdom of the Romans will succeed, more powerful than those that went before it; for which reason also it was likened to iron. For of it is said: "And the fourth kingdom shall be strong as iron; as iron breaketh and subdueth all things, so shall it break and subdue all things." And after all these kingdoms which have been mentioned, the kingdom of God is represented by the stone that breaks the whole image. And the prophet, in conformity with this, does not see the kingdom which comes at the end of all these things, until he has in order described the four dominions mentioned under the four beasts. And I think that the visions shown, both to the king and to the prophet, were visions of these four kingdoms alone, and of none others, because by these the nation of the Jews was held in bondage from the times of the prophet."
Hippolytus of RomeAD 235
Hippolytus Exegetical Fragments - Scholia on Daniel
"Behold a great image." How, then, should we not mark the things prophesied of old in Babylon by Daniel, and now yet in the course of fulfilment in the world? For the image shown at that time to Nebuchadnezzar furnished a type of the whole world. In these times the Babylonians were sovereign over all, and these were the golden head of the image. And then, after them, the Persians held the supremacy for 245 years, and they were represented by the silver. Then the Greeks had the supremacy, beginning with Alexander of Macedon, for 300 years, so that they were the brass. After them came the Romans, who were the iron legs of the image, for they were strong as iron. Then (we have) the toes of clay and iron, to signify the democracies that were subsequently to rise, partitioned among the ten toes of the image, in which shall be iron mixed with clay.
Aphrahat the Persian SageAD 345
DEMONSTRATIONS 5:12
This is the kingdom of the children of Javan, who are children of Japhet. For the children of Javan came against the kingdom of their brothers. For Madai and Javan are sons of Japhet. But Madai was foolish and incapable of governing the kingdom, until Javan, his brother, came, who was wise and cunning, to destroy the kingdoms. For Alexander, son of Philip, ruled in all the earth.
Aphrahat the Persian SageAD 345
DEMONSTRATIONS 5:12
This signified a kingdom that was inferior to it; namely, Darius the Mede [king of Persia]. For he put the kingdom on the scales, and the kingdom of the house of Nimrod was weighed and found wanting. And because it was wanting, Darius received it. Because of this he [Daniel] said “another kingdom inferior to you.” And because it was inferior, the children of Media did not rule in all the earth.
Aphrahat the Persian SageAD 345
DEMONSTRATIONS 5:11
As Daniel said, “You are the head of gold.” And why was he called the head of gold? Was it not because the word of Jeremiah was fulfilled in him? For Jeremiah said, “Babylon is a golden cup in the hand of the Lord that makes all the earth to drink of its wine.” And also Babylon was called the head of all kingdoms, as it is written, “Babylon was the head of the kingdom of Nimrod.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
COMMENTARY ON DANIEL 2:31-33
The second element, silver, signifies the Persian kingdom and the Medes. Cyrus, by way of his own success and marriage, created from the Medes the kingdom of Persia.… He speaks of a chest and arms to show that he knows there were two peoples, each limb a founder, that are joined together.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Daniel 2:32 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.