TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Acts 5:1–11. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
The chapter begins with a melancholy but, which puts a stop to the pleasant and agreeable prospect of things which we had in the foregoing chapters; as every man, so every church, in its best state has its but. 1. The disciples were very holy, and heavenly, and seemed to be all exceedingly good; but there were hypocrites among them, whose hearts were not right in the sight of God, who, when they were baptized, and took upon them the form of godliness, denied the power of godliness, and stopped short of that. There is a mixture of bad with good in the best societies on this side heaven; tares will grow among the wheat until the harvest. 2. It was the praise of the disciples that they came up to that perfection which Christ recommended to the rich young man - they sold what they had, and gave to the poor; but even that proved a cloak and cover of hypocrisy which was thought the greatest proof and evidence of sincerity. 3. The signs and wonders which the apostles wrought were hitherto miracles of mercy; but now comes in a miracle of judgment, and here is an instance of severity following the instances of goodness, that God may be both loved and feared. Observe here,
I.The sin of Ananias and Sapphira his wife.
It is good to see husband and wife joining together in that which is good, but to be confederate in evil is to be like Adam and Eve, when they agreed to eat the forbidden fruit, and were one in their disobedience. Now their sin was,
1.That they were ambitious of being thought eminent disciples, and of the first rank, when really they were not true disciples; they would pass for some of the most fruitful trees in Christ's vineyard, when really the root of the matter was not found in them. They sold a possession, and brought the money (as Barnabas did) to the apostles' feet, that they might not seem to be behind the very chief of believers, but might be applauded and cried up, and stand so much the fairer for preferment in the church, which perhaps they thought would shortly shine in secular pomp and grandeur. Note, It is possible that hypocrites may deny themselves in one thing, but then it is to serve themselves in another; they may forego their secular advantage in one instance, with a prospect of finding their account in something else. Ananias and Sapphira would take upon them a profession of Christianity, and make a fair show in the flesh with it, and so would mock God, and deceive others, when they knew they could not go through with the Christian profession. It was commendable, and so far it was right, in that rich young man, that he would not pretend to follow Christ, when, if it should come to a pinch, he knew he could not come up to his terms, but he went away sorrowful. Ananias and Sapphira pretended they could come up to the terms, that they might have the credit of being disciples, when really they could not, and so were a discredit to discipleship. Note, It is often of fatal consequence for people to go a greater length in profession than their inward principle will admit of.
2.That they were covetous of the wealth of the world, and distrustful of God and his providence: They sold their land, and perhaps then, in a pang of zeal, designed no other than to dedicate the whole of the purchase-money to pious uses, and made a vow, or at least conceived a full purpose, to do so; but, when the money was received, their heart failed them, and they kept back part of the price, (Act 5:2), because they loved the money, and thought it was too much to part with at once, and to trust in the apostles' hands, and because they knew not but they might want it themselves; though now all things were common, yet it would not be so long, and what should they do in a time of need, if they should leave themselves nothing to take to? They could not take God's word that they should be provided for, but thought they would play a wiser part than the rest had done, and lay up for a rainy day. Thus they thought to serve both God and mammon - God, by bringing part of the money to the apostles' feet, and mammon, by keeping the other part in their own pockets; as if there were not an all-sufficiency in God to make up the whole to them, except they retained some in their own hands by way of caution-money. Their hearts were divided, so they were found faulty, Hos 10:2. They halted between two; if they had been thorough-paced worldlings, they would not have sold their possession; and, if they had been thorough-paced Christians, they would not have detained part of the price.
3.That they thought to deceive the apostles, and make them believe they brought the whole purchase-money, when really it was but a part. They came with as good an assurance, and as great a show of piety and devotion, as any of them, and laid the money at the apostles' feet, as if it were their all. They dissembled with God and his Spirit, with Christ and his church and ministers; and this was their sin.
II.The indictment of Ananias, which proved both his condemnation and execution for this sin.
When he brought the money, and expected to be commended and encouraged, as others were, Peter took him to task about it, He, without any enquiry or examination of witnesses concerning it, charges him peremptorily with the crime, and aggravates it, and lays a load upon him for it, showing it to him in its own colour, Act 5:3, Act 5:4. The Spirit of God in Peter not only discovered the fact without any information (when perhaps no man in the world knew it but the man and his wife themselves), but likewise discerned the principle of reigning infidelity in the heart of Ananias, which was at the bottom of it, and therefore proceeded against him so suddenly. Had it been a sin of infirmity, through the surprise of a temptation, Peter would have taken Ananias aside, and have bidden him go home, and fetch the rest of the money, and repent of his folly in attempting to put this cheat upon them; but he knew that his heart was fully set in him to do this evil, and therefore allowed him not space to repent. He here showed him,
1.The origin of his sin: Satan filled his heart; he not only suggested it to him, and put it into his head, but hurried him on with resolution to do it. Whatever is contrary to the good Spirit proceeds from the evil spirit, and those hearts are filled by Satan in which worldliness reigns, and has the ascendant. Some think that Ananias was one of those that had received the Holy Ghost, and was filled with his gifts, but, having provoked the Spirit to withdraw from him, now Satan filled his heart; as, when the Spirit of the Lord departed from Saul, an evil spirit from God troubled him. Satan is a lying spirit; he was so in the mouth of Ahab's prophets, and so he was in the mouth of Ananias, and by this made it appear that he filled his heart.
2.The sin itself: He lied to the Holy Ghost; a sin of such a heinous nature that he could not have been guilty of it if Satan had not filled his heart.
(1.)The phrase which we render lying to the Holy Ghost, pseusasthai se to pneuma to hagion, some read, to belie the Holy Ghost, which may be taken two ways:
[1.]That he belied the Holy Ghost in himself; so Dr. Lightfoot takes it, and supposes that Ananias was not an ordinary believer, but a minister, and one that had received the gift of the Holy Ghost with the hundred and twenty (for mention is made of him immediately after Barnabas); yet he durst thus, by dissembling, belie and shame that gift. Or thus; Those who had sold their estates, and laid the money at the apostles' feet, did it by the special impulse of the Holy Ghost, enabling them to do an act so very great and generous; and Ananias pretended that he was moved by the Holy Ghost to do what he did, as others were; whereas it appeared by his baseness that he was not under the influence of the good Spirit at all; for, had it been his work, it would have been perfect.
[2.]That he belied the Holy Ghost in the apostles, to whom he brought the money; he misrepresented the Spirit they were actuated by, either by a suspicion that they would not faithfully distribute what they were entrusted with (which was a base suggestion, as if they were false to the trust reposed in them), or by an assurance that they could not discover the fraud. He belied the Holy Ghost when by what he did he would have it thought that those who are endued with the gifts of the Holy Ghost might as easily be imposed upon as other men; like Gehazi, whom his master convicted of his error by that word, Went not my heart with thee? Kg2 5:26. It is charged upon the house of Israel and Judah, when, like Ananias here, they dealt very treacherously, that they belied the Lord, saying, It is not he, Jer 5:11, Jer 5:12. Thus Ananias thought the apostles were altogether such as himself, and this was belying the Holy Ghost in them, as if he were not in them a discerner of spirits, whereas they had all the gifts of the Spirit in them, which to others were divided severally. See Co1 12:8-11. Those that pretend to an inspiration of the Spirit, in imposing upon the church their own fancies, either in opinion or practice - that say they are moved from above when they are carried on by their pride, covetousness, or affectation of dominion, belie the Holy Ghost.
(2.)But we read it, to lie unto the Holy Ghost, which reading is countenanced by Act 5:4, Thou hast not lied unto men, but unto God.
[1.]Ananias told a lie, a deliberate lie, and with a purpose to deceive; he told Peter that he had sold a possession (house or lands) and this was the purchase-money. Perhaps he expressed himself in words that were capable of a double meaning, used some equivocations about it, which he thought might palliate the matter a little, and save him from the guilt of a downright lie: or perhaps he said nothing; but it was all one, he did as the rest did who brought the whole price, and would be thought to do so, and expected the praise those had that did so, and the same privilege and access to the common stock as they had; and therefore it was an implicit protestation that he brought the whole price, as they did; and this was a lie, for he kept back part. Note, Many are brought to gross lying by reigning pride, and affectation of the applause of men, particularly in works of charity to the poor. That therefore we may not be found boasting of a false gift given to us, or given by us (Pro 25:14), we must not boast even of a true gift, which is the meaning of our Saviour's caution in works of charity, Let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth. Those that boast of good works they never did, or promise good works they never do, or make the good works they do more or better than really they are, come under the guilt of Ananias's lie, which it concerns us all to dread the thought of.
[2.]He told this lie to the Holy Ghost. It was not so much to the apostles as to the Holy Ghost in them that the money was brought, and that was said which was said, Act 5:4, Thou hast not lied unto men (not to men only, not to men chiefly, though the apostles be but men), but thou hast lied unto God. Hence it is justly inferred that the Holy Ghost is God; for he that lieth to the Holy Ghost lieth to God. "Those that lied to the apostles, actuated and acting by the Spirit of God, are said to lie to God, because the apostles acted by the power and authority of God, whence it follows (as Dr. Whitby well observes) that the power and authority of the Spirit must be the power and authority of God." And, as he further argues, "Ananias is said to lie to God, because he lied to that Spirit in the apostles which enabled them to discern the secrets of men's hearts and actions, which being the property of God alone, he that lies to him must therefore lie to God, because he lies to one who has the incommunicable property of God, and consequently the divine essence."
3.The aggravations of the sin (Act 5:4): While it remained, was it not thine own? And, after it was sold, was it not in thine own power? Which may be understood two ways: - (1.) "Thou wast under no temptation to keep back part of the price; before it was sold it was thy own, and not mortgaged nor encumbered, nor any way engaged for debt; and when it was sold it was in thy own power to dispose of the money at thy pleasure; so that thou mightest as well have brought the whole as a part. Thou hadst no debts to pay, perhaps no children to provide for; so that thou wast not under the influence of any particular inducement to keep back part of the price. Thou was a transgressor without a cause." Or, (2.) "Thou wast under no necessity of selling thy land at all, nor bringing any of the money to the apostles' feet. Thou mightest have kept the money, if thou hadst pleased, and the land too, and never have pretended to this piece of perfection." This rule of charity the apostle gives, that people be not pressed, and that it be not urged as of necessity, because God loves a cheerful giver (Co2 9:7), and Philemon must do a good work, not as it were of necessity, but willingly, Plm 1:14. As it is better not to vow than to vow and not to pay, so better had it been for him not to have sold his land at all than thus to keep back part of the price; not to have pretended to do the good work than thus to do it by the halves. "When it was sold, it was in thine own power; but it was not so when it was vowed: thou hadst then opened thy mouth to the Lord, and couldst not go back." Thus, in giving our hearts to God, we are not admitted to divide them. Satan, like the mother whose own the child was not, would take up with a half; but God will have all or none.
4.All this guilt, thus aggravated, is charged upon him: Why hast thou conceived this thing in thine heart? Observe, Though Satan filled his heart to do it, yet he is said to have conceived it in his own heart, which shows that we cannot extenuate our sins by laying the fault of them upon the devil; he tempts, but he cannot force; it is of our own lusts that we are drawn away and enticed. The evil thing, whatever it is, that is said or done, the sinner has conceived it in his own heart; and therefore, if thou scornest, thou alone shalt bear it. The close of the charge is very high, but very just: Thou hast not lied unto men, but unto God. What emphasis does the prophet lay upon that of Ahaz, not wearying men only, but wearying my God also! Isa 7:13. And Moses upon that of Israel, Your murmurings are not against us, but against the Lord! Exo 16:8. So here, Thou mightest have imposed upon us, who are men like thyself; but, be not deceived, God is not mocked. If we think to put a cheat upon God, we shall prove in the end to have put a fatal cheat upon our own souls.
III.The death and burial of Ananias, Act 5:5, Act 5:6.
1.He died upon the spot: Ananias, hearing these words, was speechless, in the same sense that he was who was charged with intruding into the wedding feast without a wedding garment: he had nothing to say for himself; but this was not all: he was struck speechless with a witness, for he was struck dead: He fell down, and gave up the ghost. It does not appear whether Peter designed and expected that this would follow upon what he said to him; it is probable that he did, for to Sapphira his wife Peter particularly spoke death, Act 5:9. Some think that an angel struck him, that he died, as Herod, Act 12:23. Or, his own conscience smote him with such horror and amazement at the sense of his guilt, that he sunk and died away under the load of it. And perhaps, when he was convicted of lying to the Holy Ghost, he remembered the unpardonableness of the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost, which struck him like a dagger to the heart. See the power of the word of God in the mouth of the apostles. As it was to some a savour of life unto life, so it was to others a savour of death unto death. As there are those whom the gospel justifies, so there are those whom it condemns. This punishment of Ananias may seem severe, but we are sure it was just.
(1.)It was designed to maintain the honour of the Holy Ghost as now lately poured out upon the apostles, in order to the setting up of the gospel kingdom. It was a great affront which Ananias put upon the Holy Ghost, as if he could be imposed upon: and it had a direct tendency to invalidate the apostles' testimony; for, if they could not by the Spirit discover this fraud, how could they by this Spirit discover the deep things of God, which they were to reveal to the children of men? It was therefore necessary that the credit of the apostles' gifts and powers should be supported, though it was at this expense.
(2.)It was designed to deter others from the like presumptions, now at the beginning of this dispensation. Simon Magus afterwards was not thus punished, nor Elymas; but Ananias was made an example now at first, that, with the sensible proofs given what a comfortable thing it is to receive the Spirit, there might be also sensible proofs given what a dangerous thing it is to resist the Spirit, and do despite to him. How severely was the worshipping of the golden calf punished, and the gathering of sticks on the sabbath-day, when the laws of the second and fourth commandments were now newly given! So was the offering of strange fire by Nadab and Abihu, and the mutiny of Korah and his company, when the fire from heaven was now newly given, and the authority of Moses and Aaron now newly established. The doing of this by the ministry of Peter, who himself with a lie denied his Master but a little while ago, intimates that it was not the resentment of a wrong done to himself; for then he, who had himself been faulty, would have had charity for those that offended; and he, who himself had repented and been forgiven, would have forgiven this affront, and endeavoured to bring this offender to repentance; but it was the act of the Spirit of God in Peter: to him the indignity was done, and by him the punishment was inflicted.
2.He was buried immediately, for this was the manner of the Jews (Act 5:6): The young men, who it is probable were appointed to that office in the church of burying the dead, as among the Romans the libitinarii and polinctores; or the young men that attended the apostles, and waited on them, they wound up the dead body in grave-clothes, carried it out of the city, and buried it decently, though he died in sin, and by an immediate stroke of divine vengeance.
IV.The reckoning with Sapphira, the wife of Ananias, who perhaps was first in the transgression, and tempted her husband to eat this forbidden fruit. She came in to the place where the apostles were, which, as it should seem, was Solomon's porch, for there we find them (Act 5:12), a part of the temple where Christ used to walk, Joh 10:23. She came in about three hours after, expecting to share in the thanks of the house for her coming in, and consenting to the sale of the land, of which perhaps she was entitled to her dower or thirds; for she knew not what had been done. It was strange that nobody ran to tell her of the sudden death of her husband, that she might keep away; perhaps some one did, and she was not at home; and so when she came to present herself before the apostles, as a benefactor to the fund she met with a breach instead of a blessing.
1.She was found guilty of sharing with her husband in his sin, by a question that Peter asked her (Act 5:8): Tell me whether you sold the land for so much? naming the sum which Ananias had brought and laid at the apostles' feet. "Was this all you received for the sale of the land, and had you no more for it?" "No," saith she, "we had no more, but that was every farthing we received." Ananias and his wife agreed to tell the same story, and the bargain being private, and by consent kept to themselves, nobody could disprove them, and therefore they thought they might safely stand in the lie, and should gain credit to it. It is sad to see those relations who should quicken one another to that which is good harden one another in that which is evil.
2.Sentence was passed upon her, that she should partake in her husband's doom, Act 5:9.
(1.)Her sin is opened: How is it that you have agreed together to tempt the Spirit of the Lord? Before he passes sentence, he makes her to know her abominations, and shows her the evil of her sin. Observe,
[1.]That they tempted the Spirit of the Lord; as Israel tempted God in the desert, when they said, Is the Lord among us, or is he not? after they had seen so many miraculous proofs of his power; and not only his presence, but his presidency, when they said, Can God furnish a table? So here, "Can the Spirit in the apostles discover this fraud? Can they discern that this is but a part of the price, when we tell them it is the whole?" Can he judge through this dark cloud? Job 22:13. They saw that the apostles had the gift of tongues; but had they the gift of discerning spirits? Those that presume upon security and impunity in sin tempt the Spirit of God; they tempt God as if he were altogether such a one as themselves.
[2.]That they agreed together to do it, making the bond of their relation to each other (which by the divine institution is a sacred tie) to become a bond of iniquity. It is hard to say which is worse between yoke-fellows and other relations - a discord in good or concord in evil. It seems to intimate that their agreeing together to do it was a further tempting of the Spirit; as if, when they had engaged to keep one another's counsel in this matter, even the Spirit of the Lord himself could not discover them. Thus they digged deep to hide their counsel from the Lord, but were made to know it is in vain. "How is it that you are thus infatuated? What strange stupidity has seized you, that you would venture to make trial of that which is past dispute? How is it that you, who are baptized Christians, do not understand yourselves better? How durst you run so great a risk?"
(2.)Her doom is read: Behold, the feet of those who have buried thy husband are at the door (perhaps he heard them coming, or knew that they could not be long): and they shall carry thee out. As Adam and Eve, who agreed to eat the forbidden fruit, were turned together out of paradise, so Ananias and Sapphira, who agreed to tempt the Spirit of the Lord, were together chased out of the world.
3.The sentence executed itself. There needed no executioner, a killing power went along with Peter's word, as sometimes a healing power did; for the God in whose name he spoke kills and makes alive; and out of his mouth (and Peter was now his mouth) both evil and good proceed (Act 5:10): Then fell she down straightway at his feet. Some sinners God makes quick work with, while others he bears long with; for which difference, doubtless, there are good reasons; but he is not accountable to us for them. She heard not till now that her husband was dead, the notice of which, with the discovery of her sin, and the sentence of death passed upon her, struck her as a thunderbolt and took her away as with a whirlwind. And many instances there are of sudden deaths which are not to be looked upon as the punishment of some gross sin, like this. We must not think that all who die suddenly are sinners above others; perhaps it is in favour to them, that they have a quick passage: however, it is forewarning to all to be always ready. But here it is plain that it was in judgment. Some put the question concerning the eternal state of Ananias and Sapphira, and incline to think that the destruction of the flesh was that the spirit might be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus. And I should go in with that charitable opinion if there had been any space given them to repent, as there was to the incestuous Corinthian. But secret things belong not to us. It is said, She fell down at Peter's feet; there, where she should have laid the whole price and did not, she was herself laid, as it were to make up the deficiency. The young men that had the care of funerals coming in found her dead; and it is not said, They wound her up, as they did Ananias, but, They carried her out as she was, and buried her by her husband; and probably an inscription was set over their graves, intimating that they were joint-monuments of divine wrath against those that lie to the Holy Ghost. Some ask whether the apostles kept the money which they did bring, and concerning which they lied? I am apt to think they did; they had not the superstition of those who said, It is not lawful for us to put it into the treasury: for unto the pure all things are pure. What they brought was not polluted to those to whom they brought it; but what they kept back was polluted to those that kept it back. Use was made of the censers of Korah's mutineers.
V.The impression that this made upon the people.
Notice is taken of this in the midst of the story (Act 5:5): Great fear came upon all that heard these things, that heard what Peter said, and saw what followed; or upon all that heard the story of it; for, no doubt, it was all the talk of the city. And again (Act 5:11), Great fear came upon all the church, and upon as many as heard these things.
1.Those that had joined themselves to the church were thereby struck with an awe of God and of his judgments, and with a greater veneration for this dispensation of the Spirit which they were now under. It was not a damp or check to their holy joy, but it taught them to be serious in it, and to rejoice with trembling. All that laid their money at the apostles' feet after this were afraid of keeping back any part of the price.
2.All that heard it were put into a consternation by it, and were ready to say, Who is able to stand before this holy Lord God and his Spirit in the apostles? As Sa1 6:20.
Historical interpretation
Nine Centuries of Reception
7 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
Peter’s words to Sapphira—“How is it that you have agreed together to tempt the Spirit of the Lord? You did not lie to men, but to God”—show that sins against the Holy Spirit and against God are the same. And thus you might learn that in every operation the Spirit is closely conjoined with, and inseparable from, the Father and the Son. While God works the differences of operations and the Lord the diversities of administrations, the Holy Spirit is present also, administering in his own power the distribution of the gifts according to each recipient’s worth.
"You shall not steal:" [Exodus 20:15] for Achan, when he had stolen in Israel at Jericho, was stoned to death; [Joshua 7:1] and Gehazi, who stole, and told a lie, inherited the leprosy of Naaman; [2 Kings 5:27] and Judas, who stole the poor's money, betrayed the Lord of glory to the Jews, [John 12:6] and repented, and hanged himself, and burst asunder in the midst, and all his bowels gushed out; [Matthew 27:5; Acts 1:18] and Ananias, and Sapphira his wife, who stole their own goods, and "tempted the Spirit of the Lord," were immediately, at the sentence of Peter our fellow-apostle, struck dead. [Acts 5:1-11]
"Thou hast not lied unto men but unto God": First, we understand that he called the Holy Spirit the Spirit of the Lord. Then, since he mentioned first the Holy Spirit and added: "Thou hast not lied unto men but unto God," you must necessarily either understand the oneness of the Godhead in the Holy Spirit, since when the Holy Spirit is tempted a lie is told to God; or, if you endeavour to exclude the oneness of the Godhead, you yourself according to the words of Scripture certainly believe Him to be God.
"Whiles it remained," says he, "was it not thine own? and after it was sold, was it not in thine own power?" That is, "Was there any obligation and force? do we constrain you against your will?" "Why hast thou conceived this thing in thine heart? thou hast not lied unto men, but unto God."
In the next place, Peter proves him guilty, and shows that the deed was not hidden from him, and then pronounces the sentence. But wherefore, upon what purpose hast thou done this? Didst thou wish to keep it? Thou oughtest to have kept it all along, and never to have professed to give it. The sacrilege, beloved, is a grievous one. For another, it may be, coveted what was not his own: but it was at thy discretion to keep what was thine own. Why then didst thou first make it sacred, and then take it? Out of excessive contempt hast thou done this. The deed does not admit of pardon, it is past pleading for.
But inasmuch as a changed intention bears the crime of deceit, and when there is, moreover, confirmation of a promise, it is proper to stand firm and not wish to violate what was first [promised] by what follows; it is more just to preserve a permanent right than to withdraw it. The punishment of the two established a warning for all, lest anyone should call [back] gifts which a solemn promise requires him to owe. Reflect, you of true faith, and consider the words of Peter, which are bright with blessed teaching, “Whoever persuaded you to be deceitful?” And he concluded by judging, “You do not deceive people by saying such things; you lie to God.” The teaching that condemns the wicked strengthens the holy.
You have not lied to men but to God. Before, he had said he lied to the Holy Spirit. Therefore, the Holy Spirit is indeed God, and the error of Macedonius was condemned before it existed.
The sin of Ananias and Saphira was denounced by Peter acting as God's executor, by Whose revelation he knew of their sin.
You have not lied to men, but to God:
The Holy Ghost is expressly called God in the text: Ananias, why hath Satan tempted thy heart to lie to the Holy Ghost? . . . . Thou hast not lied to men, but to God
Continue studying Acts 5:4 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Acts 5:4 captures Peter's profound indictment of Ananias, laying bare the true nature of his deception regarding the sale of his property. The verse underscores the absolute freedom Ananias possessed over his possessions both before and after their sale, revealing that his sin was not in withholding funds but in the deliberate, premeditated falsehood conceived in his heart. Crucially, Peter clarifies that Ananias's lie was not merely against human beings, but a direct affront to God Himself, highlighting the divine presence and authority within the early Christian community and the gravity of hypocrisy before the Holy Spirit.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is situated at the beginning of Acts chapter 5, following the vibrant depiction of the early church's unity, generosity, and the powerful witness of the apostles in Acts 4:32-37. The preceding verses emphasize that believers were voluntarily selling possessions and laying the proceeds at the apostles' feet for equitable distribution among those in need. Barnabas is highlighted as a positive example of this selfless giving. Ananias and Sapphira, however, sought the reputation of generosity without the reality, attempting to deceive the community and, as Peter reveals, God himself, by pretending to give the full amount while secretly retaining a portion. This incident serves as a stark contrast to the genuine fellowship and integrity portrayed earlier, marking a critical moment of divine discipline to preserve the purity of the nascent church.
Historical & Cultural Context
The early Christian community in Jerusalem operated within a Jewish cultural framework that valued communal support, especially for the poor and needy, as seen in the Old Testament laws regarding tithing and gleaning. However, the radical sharing described in Acts was voluntary, not a mandated communalism like some later monastic orders. Property ownership was a norm, and there was no command for believers to liquidate all their assets. The early church was a burgeoning movement, still finding its footing and establishing its internal norms. The presence of the apostles as authoritative figures, empowered by the Holy Spirit, meant that their pronouncements carried divine weight. Deception within such a close-knit, Spirit-filled community, particularly concerning matters of integrity and financial stewardship, was seen as a profound betrayal, not just of trust among believers, but of the divine presence actively working among them.
Key Themes
Acts 5:4 contributes significantly to several key themes within the book of Acts and broader New Testament theology. Firstly, it powerfully underscores the theme of voluntary giving within the body of Christ, explicitly stating that Ananias was under no obligation to sell his property or to give all the proceeds. This highlights that true generosity stems from a willing heart, not compulsion, a principle echoed in 2 Corinthians 9:7. Secondly, the verse exposes the insidious nature of hypocrisy and deceit, revealing that the sin was not merely in withholding money but in the premeditated lie conceived in the heart. This points to the internal disposition and the desire for false recognition as the root of the transgression. Thirdly, and most profoundly, it affirms the deity and personhood of the Holy Spirit, equating lying to the Spirit with lying to God, a truth also evident in Acts 5:3. This incident thus establishes the critical importance of holiness and integrity within the church, demonstrating God's commitment to maintaining the purity and truthfulness of His community from its very foundation.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This term (G1849) denotes privilege, force, capacity, competency, freedom, or mastery, often implying delegated influence or authority. In this context, Peter uses it to emphasize Ananias's complete liberty and right over his property. He had full "power" or "authority" to decide what to do with it, both before and after the sale. This highlights that his sin was not a violation of a communal property rule, but a betrayal of truth while exercising his legitimate freedom.
While its primary meaning (G5087) is "to place" or "to put," in this context, it carries the figurative sense of "to conceive," "to purpose," or "to settle" something in the mind or heart. Peter's question, "why hast thou conceived this thing in thine heart?", points to the premeditated and deliberate nature of Ananias's deception. It was not a spontaneous mistake but a thought or plan that he intentionally formed and harbored in his inner being.
This verb (G5574) means "to utter an untruth" or "to attempt to deceive by falsehood." Peter's declaration, "thou hast not lied unto men, but unto God," starkly clarifies the ultimate recipient and gravity of Ananias's deception. It underscores that the falsehood was not merely a social transgression or a betrayal of human trust, but a direct affront to the divine presence and truth, revealing the Holy Spirit's identity as God.
Verse Breakdown
"Whiles it remained, was it not thine own? and after it was sold, was it not in thine own power?"
Peter's rhetorical questions emphatically establish Ananias's complete autonomy over his property. Before the sale, the land was unequivocally his, and he was under no obligation to sell it. After the sale, the proceeds were still "in thine own power" (under his control and authority). This powerfully refutes any notion that Ananias was compelled to give the money or that his sin was merely a failure to conform to an expected communal standard. His freedom of choice is paramount to understanding the nature of his sin.
"why hast thou conceived this thing in thine heart?"
This clause cuts to the core of Ananias's transgression, revealing its internal, premeditated origin. The sin was not an impulsive act but a deliberate plan or intention ("this thing") that he had formed and harbored within his "heart"—the biblical seat of thought, will, and moral character. This question exposes the deep-seated hypocrisy and deceit that motivated his actions, emphasizing the intentionality behind his lie.
"thou hast not lied unto men, but unto God."
This is the climactic and most profound statement of the verse. Peter elevates the nature of Ananias's sin from a mere human transgression to a direct offense against the divine. By stating that the lie was not "unto men" (the apostles or the community) but "unto God," Peter unequivocally asserts the deity of the Holy Spirit, whom Ananias had attempted to deceive (as stated in Acts 5:3). This declaration highlights the immense presence and authority of God within the early church and the severe consequences of attempting to deceive Him.
Literary Devices
Acts 5:4 employs several potent literary devices to convey its profound message. The most prominent is Rhetorical Question, seen in "Whiles it remained, was it not thine own? and after it was sold, was it not in thine own power?" These questions are not posed to elicit information but to make an undeniable point, emphasizing Ananias's complete freedom and thus the intentionality of his sin. This device also serves to highlight the Irony of Ananias's situation: he had full liberty but chose to abuse it through deception. The verse then uses powerful Contrast with the phrase "thou hast not lied unto men, but unto God." This sharp antithesis dramatically elevates the gravity of Ananias's sin, moving it from the realm of human deceit to divine offense. This contrast also serves as a form of Emphasis, underscoring the Holy Spirit's divine nature and the sacredness of the early Christian community as a place where God's presence was acutely felt.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Acts 5:4 serves as a foundational text for understanding the seriousness of sin, particularly hypocrisy and deceit, within the community of faith. It powerfully affirms the deity of the Holy Spirit, equating a lie against the Spirit with a lie against God Himself, thereby establishing the Spirit's full divine personhood. The passage also underscores God's commitment to the purity and integrity of His church, demonstrating that divine judgment will fall upon those who attempt to defile it with falsehood. This incident, therefore, is not merely a historical anecdote but a timeless lesson on the importance of sincerity, truthfulness, and reverence for God's presence among His people. It reveals that God sees beyond outward appearances and judges the intentions of the heart, demanding genuine devotion rather than performative piety.
Reflection and Application
Acts 5:4 offers profound lessons for contemporary believers, challenging us to examine the authenticity of our faith and actions. The freedom Ananias had over his property reminds us that our giving, service, and indeed all aspects of our Christian walk, should be motivated by genuine love and devotion, not by compulsion, a desire for human praise, or a need to maintain an outward image. God is not interested in our performance, but in the sincerity of our hearts. When we engage in any form of deception, whether in our financial dealings, our relationships, or our spiritual practices, we are not merely misleading others; we are ultimately lying to God, who sees and knows all. This verse calls us to a radical integrity, where our private lives align with our public declarations, and our motives are pure before the One who searches the heart. It compels us to cultivate a profound reverence for the Holy Spirit, recognizing His divine presence and authority in our lives and in the church, and to live in a manner that honors His truth.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Was Ananias punished for not giving all his money to the church?
No, Ananias was not punished for withholding a portion of the money. Peter explicitly states, "Whiles it remained, was it not thine own? and after it was sold, was it not in thine own power?" This confirms that Ananias had complete freedom and authority over his property and its proceeds. The sin was not in keeping back some of the money, but in the deliberate deception—pretending to give the entire amount while secretly retaining a portion, thereby lying about the extent of his offering. His punishment was for the hypocrisy and deceit, not for a lack of total generosity. The early church's practice of sharing was voluntary, not compulsory, as seen in the example of Barnabas in Acts 4:36-37.
Why was the punishment for Ananias and Sapphira so severe?
The severe judgment on Ananias and Sapphira served multiple critical purposes for the nascent Christian church. Firstly, it underscored the absolute holiness and truthfulness of God, particularly the Holy Spirit, whose presence was powerfully at work in the early community. Lying to the Holy Spirit was equated with lying to God Himself, a grave offense. Secondly, it acted as a deterrent against hypocrisy and deceit, ensuring the purity and integrity of the church from its very foundation. In a new movement seeking to establish its identity and witness, maintaining moral and spiritual purity was paramount. This divine discipline established a clear standard for sincerity and truthfulness among believers, preventing the spread of corruption and reinforcing the seriousness of covenant relationship with God. It was a foundational lesson that God takes sin within His house very seriously, as also seen in Old Testament accounts like Leviticus 10:1-2.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Acts 5:4, while a narrative of judgment, powerfully illuminates Christ's redemptive work and the nature of His kingdom. The very sin of Ananias—deceit originating in the heart and directed against God—is precisely what necessitated Christ's atoning sacrifice. Humanity's fundamental problem, as revealed here, is not merely external actions but the internal disposition of a heart prone to sin and falsehood, as Jesus Himself taught in Mark 7:21-23. Christ came to redeem such hearts, offering forgiveness and a new nature through the indwelling Holy Spirit, who is here revealed as God. The severity of the judgment on Ananias and Sapphira underscores God's unwavering holiness and His demand for truth and purity within His new covenant community, the Church, which Christ purchased with His own blood (Acts 20:28). The Holy Spirit, whom Ananias lied to, is the Spirit of Christ (Romans 8:9), empowering believers to live in truth and holiness, a life impossible apart from Christ's transformative work. Thus, this passage, by exposing the depth of human sin and God's righteous judgment, ultimately points to the profound necessity and efficacy of Christ's cross in establishing a people truly set apart for God, whose hearts are made new to walk in integrity and truth before Him (Ephesians 4:22-24).