Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
For the man was above forty years old, on whom this miracle of healing was shewed.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
For G1063 the man G444 was G2258 above G4119 forty G5062 years old G2094, on G1909 whom G3739 this G5124 miracle G4592 of healing G2392 was shewed G1096.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
since the man who had been miraculously healed was more than forty years old.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
For the man who was miraculously healed was over forty years old.
Ask
American Standard Version
For the man was more than forty years old, on whom this miracle of healing was wrought.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
For the man on whom this miracle of healing was performed was more than forty years old.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
For the man was aboue fourtie yeeres olde, on whome this miracle of healing was shewed.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
for above forty years of age was the man upon whom had been done this sign of the healing.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 27,045 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Acts 4:22 provides a crucial detail regarding the miraculous healing of the lame man at the Beautiful Gate, emphasizing his advanced age of over forty years. This seemingly simple detail serves to underscore the undeniable nature and profound impact of the miracle, validating the apostles' message and leaving the Jewish authorities without a credible counter-argument against the divine power at work through Peter and John.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is embedded within the narrative of Peter and John's arrest and subsequent interrogation by the Sanhedrin, as recorded in Acts 4. The healing of the lame man, detailed in Acts 3:1-10, served as the immediate catalyst for their apprehension. Following Peter's powerful sermon in Acts 3:11-26, the religious authorities, particularly the Sadducees who denied the resurrection, were greatly disturbed by the apostles' bold proclamation of Jesus' resurrection and the accompanying signs. Acts 4:22 acts as a parenthetical explanation, providing a critical piece of evidence that solidifies the irrefutability of the miracle, directly influencing the Sanhedrin's dilemma in Acts 4:16.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The setting is Jerusalem, specifically the Temple precincts and the Sanhedrin's chambers. The Sanhedrin was the supreme Jewish judicial and administrative council, composed of chief priests (mostly Sadducees), elders, and scribes (mostly Pharisees). The Sadducees, a prominent group among the Jewish elite, rejected the concept of a bodily resurrection, angels, and spirits, which put them in direct theological conflict with the apostles' message of Jesus' resurrection. The man's long-term lameness would have been publicly known to many who frequented the Temple, where he begged daily (Acts 3:2). His age of "above forty years old" would have signified a condition of chronic, incurable disability, making his instantaneous healing an extraordinary event that defied natural explanation and was impossible to dismiss as a mere trick or psychosomatic cure.
  • Key Themes: Acts 4:22 contributes significantly to several key themes within the book of Acts. Firstly, it highlights the undeniable evidence of God's power at work through the apostles. The man's age ensures that his healing was not a minor or recent ailment but a lifelong, well-known condition, making the miracle irrefutable and publicly verifiable. This irrefutability is explicitly acknowledged by the Sanhedrin in Acts 4:16. Secondly, the verse underscores the validation of the Gospel message. The miracle serves as a powerful "sign" (Greek: semeion) that authenticates the apostles' claims about Jesus' resurrection and His ongoing power, demonstrating divine approval for their ministry. Thirdly, it powerfully illustrates the sovereignty and transformative power of God, demonstrating that the early church's ministry was accompanied by supernatural manifestations that confirmed the truth of their message, even in the face of intense opposition (Acts 2:43).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • gár (Greek, gár', G1063): This particle, translated "For," introduces a causal explanation. It signals that the following statement ("the man was above forty years old") provides the reason or justification for the preceding assertion, which is the undeniable nature of the miracle and the Sanhedrin's inability to refute it. It underscores the logical connection between the man's age and the miracle's impact.
  • pleíōn (Greek, pleíōn', G4119): Translated "above" or "more," this comparative adjective emphasizes the significant duration of the man's affliction. "Above forty years old" is not just "forty" but more than forty, highlighting the severity and chronicity of his lameness. This detail amplifies the miraculous nature of his healing, as a condition of such long standing would be considered utterly hopeless by natural means.
  • gínomai (Greek, gínomai', G1096): This verb, translated "was shewed" or "came to be," denotes the occurrence or happening of the miracle. It emphasizes the event of the healing, that it "came into being" or "occurred" to this specific individual. The use of this verb highlights the dynamic and active nature of the divine intervention, not merely a static state but a powerful, transformative action.

Verse Breakdown

  • "For the man was above forty years old": This clause provides the critical evidentiary detail. The man's age is specified to establish the long-term, congenital, and therefore undeniable nature of his lameness. It eliminates any possibility of the healing being a temporary remission, a psychosomatic effect, or a staged event, as his condition was well-known and of significant duration.
  • "on whom this miracle": This phrase directly links the man to the specific act of divine power. The demonstrative "this" points to the widely observed and discussed event at the Beautiful Gate. The term "miracle" (Greek: sēmeîon, "sign") signifies that the event was not merely a wonder but an act of God intended to point to a deeper spiritual truth and validate the apostles' message.
  • "of healing was shewed": This final part describes the specific nature of the miracle – a complete restoration of physical health. The passive voice "was shewed" (or "came to pass") emphasizes that the healing was not self-generated but was an action performed upon the man, by an external, divine power, reinforcing the idea that God was the agent of this extraordinary event.

Literary Devices

The verse employs Emphasis through the specific detail of the man's age ("above forty years old"). This numerical specificity is not arbitrary; it serves to heighten the impact and irrefutability of the miracle. By stating his age, Luke, the author, underscores the chronic and well-known nature of the man's disability, making his instantaneous healing all the more astonishing and impossible for the Sanhedrin to deny. Furthermore, the use of the term semeîon (sign) for "miracle" is a form of Symbolism, as the physical healing of the lame man symbolizes the spiritual healing and restoration that Jesus offers to all who believe. It is a tangible manifestation of the invisible power of God, pointing to the greater spiritual realities of the Gospel. There is also an element of Narrative Irony in the Sanhedrin's predicament: despite their power and authority, the undeniable evidence of the miracle (highlighted by the man's age) renders them helpless to suppress the apostles' message, forcing them to acknowledge the "notable miracle" in Acts 4:16.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Acts 4:22 profoundly illustrates the principle that God often validates His truth and the ministry of His servants through tangible, undeniable demonstrations of His power. The age of the healed man served as a public, irrefutable testimony to the authenticity of the miracle, leaving no room for doubt or dismissal by the authorities. This reflects a consistent biblical pattern where divine power accompanies divine revelation, providing external confirmation for internal conviction. It underscores that the Gospel is not merely a philosophy but a living, dynamic power that transforms lives and defies human limitations, serving as a powerful witness to the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Acts 4:22 serves as a powerful reminder that God's truth is often accompanied by undeniable evidence, whether in the form of miraculous interventions or the profound, transformative power of the Gospel in individual lives. Just as the lame man's healing was a public, verifiable testament to God's power, our lives, transformed by Christ, can serve as compelling witnesses to the reality of His work. This verse encourages believers to live with confidence in the truth of the Gospel, knowing that it is not based on human wisdom or persuasion alone, but on the demonstrable power of God. When we face opposition or skepticism, we can rest in the assurance that God is able to provide the necessary validation for His message, often through the very lives of those He has touched. It challenges us to consider how our own lives reflect the transformative power of God and how we might boldly share the truth of Christ, trusting that His power stands behind His message.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what ways does God provide "undeniable evidence" of His presence and power in the world today?
  • How does the transformation in your own life serve as a "miracle of healing" that points others to Christ?
  • What specific challenges do you face in sharing your faith, and how can the boldness of Peter and John, rooted in undeniable truth, encourage you?

FAQ

Why is the man's age (above forty years old) specifically mentioned in this verse?

Answer: The man's age is a crucial detail mentioned to emphasize the undeniable and chronic nature of his lameness. Since he was "above forty years old" and had been lame from birth (Acts 3:2), his condition was not a recent ailment or a minor disability but a lifelong, well-known, and seemingly incurable affliction. This detail made his instantaneous healing profoundly miraculous and publicly verifiable, leaving no room for the Jewish authorities to dismiss it as a trick, a temporary remission, or a psychosomatic cure. It served as irrefutable evidence that a genuine divine intervention had occurred, validating the apostles' message about Jesus' power.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Acts 4:22, while detailing a physical healing, ultimately points to the greater spiritual healing found in Jesus Christ. The lame man's lifelong inability to walk symbolizes humanity's spiritual paralysis and inability to approach God on its own terms, a condition inherited from the fall (Romans 3:10-12). Just as the man was healed by the power of Jesus' name, so too are believers spiritually healed and made whole through faith in the crucified and resurrected Christ. The miracle at the Beautiful Gate, performed through Peter and John, foreshadows the ultimate work of Christ, who came "to seek and to save the lost" (Luke 19:10). His atoning sacrifice on the cross and His resurrection provide the complete and final remedy for humanity's spiritual brokenness, enabling us to walk in newness of life (Romans 6:4) and enter into the presence of God. The physical sign of healing served to authenticate the message of the One who offers the ultimate and eternal healing of the soul, a healing that transcends physical limitations and brings reconciliation with God (2 Corinthians 5:18-19).

Copy as

Commentary on Acts 4 verses 15–22

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

We have here the issue of the trial of Peter and John before the council. They came off now with flying colours, because they must be trained up to sufferings by degrees, and by less trials be prepared for greater. They now but run with the footmen; hereafter we shall have them contending with horses, Jer 12:5.

I. Here is the consultation and resolution of the court about this matter, and their proceeding thereupon.

1.The prisoners were ordered to withdraw (Act 4:15): They commanded them to go aside out of the council, willing enough to get clear of them (they spoke so home to their consciences), and not willing they should hear the acknowledgements that were extorted from them; but, though they might not hear from them, we have them here upon record. The designs of Christ's enemies are carried on in close cabals, and they dig deep, as if they would hide their counsels from the Lord.

2.A debate arose upon this matter: They conferred among themselves; every one is desired to speak his mind freely, and to give advice upon this important affair. Now the scripture was fulfilled that the rulers would take counsel together against the Lord, and against his anointed, Psa 2:2. The question proposed was, What shall we do to these men? Act 4:16. If they would have yielded to the convincing commanding power of truth, it had been easy to say what they should do to these men. They should have placed them at the head of their council, and received their doctrine, and been baptized by them in the name of the Lord Jesus, and joined in fellowship with them. But, when men will not be persuaded to do what they should do, it is no marvel that they are ever and anon at a loss what to do. The truths of Christ, if men would but entertain them as they should, would give them no manner of trouble or uneasiness; but, if they hold them or imprison them in unrighteousness (Rom 1:18), they will find them a burdensome stone that they will not know what to do with, Zac 12:3.

3.They came at last to a resolution, in two things: -

(1.)That it was not safe to punish the apostles for what they had done. Very willingly would they have done it, but they had not courage to do it, because the people espoused their cause, and cried up the miracle; and they stood now in as much awe of them as they had done formerly, when they durst not lay hands of Christ for fear of the people. By this it appears that the outcry of the mob against our Saviour was a forced or managed thing, the stream soon returned to its former channel. Now they could not find how they might punish Peter and John, what colour they might have for it, because of the people. They knew it would be an unrighteous thing to punish them, and therefore should have been restrained from it by the fear of God; but they considered it only as a dangerous thing, and therefore were held in from it only by the fear of the people. For, [1.] The people were convinced of the truth of the miracle; it was a notable miracle, gnōston sēmeion - a known miracle; it was known that they did it in Christ's name, and that Christ himself had often the like before. This was a known instance of the power of Christ, and a proof of his doctrine. That it was a great miracle, and wrought for the confirmation of the doctrine they preached (for it was a sign), was manifest to all that dwelt in Jerusalem: it was an opinion universally received, and, the miracle being wrought at the gate of the temple, universal notice was taken of it; and they themselves, with all the craftiness and all the effrontery they had, could not deny it to be a true miracle; every body would have hooted at them if they had. They could easily deny it to their own consciences, but not to the world. The proofs of the gospel were undeniable. [2.] They went further, and were not only convinced of the truth of the miracle, but all men glorified God for that which was done. Even those that were not persuaded by it to believe in Christ were yet so affected with it, as a mercy to a poor man and an honour to their country, that they could not but give praise to God for it; even natural religion taught them to do this. And, if the priests had punished Peter and John for that for which all men glorified God, they would have lost all their interest in the people, and been abandoned as enemies both to God and man. Thus therefore their wrath shall be made to praise God, and the remainder thereof shall be restrained.

(2.)That it was nevertheless necessary to silence them for the future, Act 4:17, Act 4:18. They could not prove that they had said or done any thing amiss, and yet they must no more say nor do what they have done. All their care is that the doctrine of Christ spread no further among the people; as if that healing institution were a plague begun, the contagion of which must be stopped. See how the malice of hell fights against the counsels of heaven; God will have the knowledge of Christ to spread all the world over, but the chief priests would have it spread no further, which he that sits in heaven laughs at. Now, to prevent the further spreading of this doctrine, [1.] They charge the apostles never to preach it any more. Be it enacted by their authority (which they think every Israelite is bound in conscience to submit to) that no man speak at all nor teach in the name of Jesus, Act 4:18. We do not find that they give them any reason why the doctrine of Christ must be suppressed; they cannot say it is false or dangerous, or of any ill tendency, and they are ashamed to own the true reason, that it testifies against their hypocrisy and wickedness, and shocks their tyranny. But, Stat pro ratione voluntas - They can assign no reason but their will. "We strictly charge and command you, not only that you do not preach this doctrine publicly, but that you speak henceforth to no man, not to any particular person privately, in this name," Act 4:17. There is not a greater service done to the devil's kingdom than the silencing of faithful ministers; and putting those under a bushel that are the lights of the world. [2.] They threaten them if they do, strictly threaten them: it is at their peril. This court will reckon itself highly affronted if they do, and they shall fall under its displeasure. Christ had not only charged them to preach the gospel to every creature, but had promised to bear them out in it, and reward them for it. Now these priests not only forbid the preaching of the gospel, but threaten to punish it as a heinous crime; but those who know how to put a just value upon the world's threatenings, though they be threatenings of slaughter that it breathes out, Act 9:1.

II. Here is the courageous resolution of the prisoners to go on in their work, notwithstanding the resolutions of this court, and their declaration of this resolution, Act 4:19, Act 4:20. Peter and John needed not confer together to know one another's minds (for they were both actuated by one and the same Spirit), but agree presently in the same sentiments, and jointly put in the answer: "Whether it be right in the sight of God, to whom both you and we are accountable, to hearken unto you more than unto God, we appeal to yourselves, judge you; for we cannot forbear speaking to every body the things which we have seen and heard, and are ourselves full of, and are charged to publish." The prudence of the serpent would have directed them to be silent, and, though they could not with a good conscience promise that they would not preach the gospel any more, yet they needed not tell the rulers that they would. But the boldness of the lion directed them thus to set both the authority and the malignity of their persecutors at defiance. They do, in effect, tell them that they are resolved to go on in preaching, and justify themselves in it with two things: - 1. The command of God: "You charge us not to preach the gospel; he has charged us to preach it, has committed it to us as a trust, requiring us upon our allegiance faithfully to dispense it; now whom must we obey, God or you?" Here they appeal to one of the communes notitiae - to a settled and acknowledged maxim in the law of nature, that if men's commands and God's interfere God's commands must take place. It is a rule in the common law of England that if any statute be made contrary to the law of God it is null and void. Nothing can be more absurd than to hearken unto weak and fallible men, that are fellow-creatures and fellow-subjects, more than unto a God that is infinitely wise and holy, our Creator and sovereign Lord, and the Judge to whom we are all accountable. The case is so plain, so uncontroverted and self-evident, that we will venture to leave it to yourselves to judge of it, though you are biassed and prejudiced. Can you think it right in the sight of God to break a divine command in obedience to a human injunction? That is right indeed which is right in the sight of God; for his judgment, we are sure, is according to truth, and therefore by that we ought to govern ourselves. 2. The convictions of their consciences. Even if they had not had such an express command from heaven to preach the doctrine of Christ, yet they could not but speak, and speak publicly, those things which they had seen and heard. Like Elihu, they were full of this matter, and the Spirit within them constrained them, they must speak, that they might be refreshed, Job 32:18, Job 32:20. (1.) They felt the influence of it upon themselves, what a blessed change it had wrought upon them, had brought them into a new world, and therefore they could not but speak of it: and those speak the doctrine of Christ best that have felt the power of it, and tasted the sweetness of it, and have themselves been deeply affected with it; it is as a fire in their bones, Jer 20:9. (2.) They knew the importance of it to others. They look with concern upon perishing souls, and know that they cannot escape eternal ruin but by Jesus Christ, and therefore will be faithful to them in giving them warning, and showing them the right way. They are things which we have seen and heard, and therefore will be faithful to them in giving them warning, and showing them the right way. They are things which we only have seen and heard, and therefore, if we do not publish them, who will? Who can? Knowing the favour, as well as the terror of the Lord, we persuade men; for the love of Christ and the love of souls constrain us, Co2 5:11, Co2 5:14.

III. Here is the discharge of the prisoners (Act 4:21): They further threatened them, and thought they frightened them, and then let them go. There were many whom they terrified into an obedience to their unrighteous decrees; they knew how to keep men in awe with their excommunication (Joh 9:22), and thought they could have the same influence upon the apostles that they had upon other men; but they were deceived, for they had been with Jesus. They threatened them, and that was all they did now: when they had done this they let them go, 1. Because they durst not contradict the people, who glorified God for that which was done, and would have been ready (at least they thought so) to pull them out of their seats, if they had punished the apostles for doing it. As rulers by the ordinance of God are made a terror and restraint to wicked people, so people are sometimes by the providence of God made a terror and restrain to wicked rulers. 2. Because they could not contradict the miracle: For (Act 4:22) the man was above forty years old on whom this miracle of healing was shown. And therefore, (1.) The miracle was so much the greater, he having been lame from his mother's womb, Act 3:2. The older he grew the more inveterate the disease was, and the more hardly cured. If those that are grown into years, and have been long accustomed to evil, are cured of their spiritual impotency to good, and thereby of their evil customs, the power of divine grace is therein so much the more magnified. (2.) The truth of it was so much the better attested; for the man being above forty years old, he was able, like the blind man whom Christ healed, when he was asked, to speak for himself, Joh 9:21.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 15–22. Public domain.
Copy as
IrenaeusAD 202
Against Heresies Book III
They were confounded, therefore, both by this instance of healing ("for the man was above forty years old on whom this miracle of healing took place"
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on Acts 10
"For the man was above forty years old, on whom this miracle of healing was showed."
BedeAD 735
Commentary on Acts
The man was over forty years old on whom this sign of healing was performed. According to the history, the perfect age of the man is indicated amidst the invincible critics. Allegorically, however, the people of Israel did not only seek the Egyptian impurities in the desert for forty years, despising manna, but even in the promised land, they always limped between the rituals of the Lord and of idols. Or if the number forty signifies the double fullness of the law (for four times ten makes forty), the transgressor of both, like a weak person, lying down, surpasses the forty-like perfection.
Erasmus of RotterdamAD 1536
He had been born lame, and he had displayed his debility for so many years as a beggar that no one could say in slander that this deformity was simulated or insignificant.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Acts 4:22 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.