Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
So the chief captain then let the young man depart, and charged him, See thou tell no man that thou hast shewed these things to me.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
So G3303 G3767 the chief captain G5506 then let G630 the young man G3494 depart G630, and charged G3853 him, See thou tell G1583 no man G3367 that G3754 thou hast shewed G1718 these things G5023 to G4314 me G3165.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The commander let the young man go, cautioning him, “Don’t tell anyone that you have reported this to me.”
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
So the commander dismissed the young man and instructed him, “Do not tell anyone that you have reported this to me.”
Ask
American Standard Version
So the chief captain let the young man go, charging him, Tell no man that thou hast signified these things to me.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
So the commanding officer let the young man go, charging him, “Tell no one that you have revealed these things to me.”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
The chiefe captaine then let the yong man depart, after hee had charged him to vtter it to no man, that he had shewed him these things.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
The chief captain, then, indeed, let the young man go, having charged him to tell no one, `that these things thou didst shew unto me;'
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
Paul Arrested and Brought to Caesarea
Paul Arrested and Brought to Caesarea View full PDF
All Acts Sites (Eastern Mediterranean)
All Acts Sites (Eastern Mediterranean) View full PDF
Overview of Paul's Journeys
Overview of Paul's Journeys View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 27,757 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Acts 23:22 records the decisive action of Claudius Lysias, the Roman chief captain, who, upon learning of a dangerous assassination plot against Paul, immediately released the young man who had revealed the conspiracy and strictly enjoined him to maintain absolute secrecy about their conversation. This pivotal moment underscores the chief captain's shrewdness and diligence in protecting a Roman citizen, while simultaneously highlighting God's providential care in preserving Paul for his divinely appointed mission.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated at a critical juncture in Paul's tumultuous time in Jerusalem. Following his arrest in the temple (Acts 21:27-36), Paul had already faced an angry mob, addressed them (Acts 22:1-21), and then been interrogated by the chief captain. His appearance before the Sanhedrin (Acts 22:30-23:10) resulted in a violent division between Pharisees and Sadducees, necessitating his rescue by Roman soldiers. Immediately preceding Acts 23:22, a grave and oath-bound conspiracy by more than forty Jewish men to ambush and kill Paul is revealed (Acts 23:12-15). Paul's nephew, hearing of this plot, bravely reported it first to Paul, then, at Paul's urging, to the chief captain (Acts 23:16-21). The chief captain's action in Acts 23:22 is his immediate, confidential response to this urgent intelligence, setting the stage for Paul's covert transfer to Caesarea.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The setting is Jerusalem, a city under Roman occupation, characterized by simmering tensions between Jewish religious authorities, various nationalist factions, and the Roman administration. Claudius Lysias, as a chiliarchos (chief captain), commanded a cohort of Roman soldiers, responsible for maintaining order and upholding Roman law. Roman citizenship, which Paul possessed (as revealed in Acts 22:28), conferred significant legal protections, including the right to a fair trial and protection from unlawful harm. The oath taken by the conspirators (Acts 23:12) reflects a zealous, often violent, segment of Jewish society that viewed Paul as a traitor to their traditions. The chief captain's need for secrecy was paramount, as public knowledge of his actions could incite further unrest or jeopardize the success of Paul's transfer, potentially leading to a larger confrontation with the Jewish leadership or the conspirators.
  • Key Themes: This verse contributes significantly to several overarching themes in Acts. Foremost is Divine Providence and Protection, demonstrating how God orchestrates events and uses unexpected agents—like Paul's nephew and a Roman officer—to protect His servant and advance His kingdom purposes, even amidst intense opposition. This echoes the Lord's direct assurance to Paul in Acts 23:11 that he must testify in Rome. Another theme is Roman Authority and Justice, showing how Roman law, despite its pagan origins, often served as an instrument of divine will, providing a measure of order and protection for Paul against the religious zealotry of his own people. The chief captain's actions exemplify Prudence and Discretion, highlighting the wisdom of handling sensitive information with secrecy to ensure the success of a critical operation. This entire episode underscores the Clash of Kingdoms, where the spiritual mission of the Gospel (represented by Paul) continually confronts human opposition, yet God's sovereign plan prevails.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • chilíarchos (Greek, chilíarchos', G5506): This term (G5506) translates to "chief captain" and literally means "commander of a thousand soldiers." It signifies a high-ranking Roman military tribune, emphasizing Claudius Lysias's significant authority and responsibility within the Roman administrative and military structure in Jerusalem. His actions here are not merely personal but official, reflecting the power and duty of the Roman Empire to protect its citizens.
  • parangéllō (Greek, parangéllō', G3853): Translated as "charged" (G3853), this verb means "to transmit a message," or more strongly, "to enjoin" or "command." It conveys an authoritative and urgent directive. The chief captain wasn't merely suggesting; he was issuing a strict order, underscoring the critical importance of the young man's silence to the success of his protective measures for Paul.
  • eklaléō (Greek, eklaléō', G1583): This word (G1583), meaning "to divulge" or "to tell," is used here in the negative ("tell no man"). Coupled with the negative particle mēdeís (G3367, "not even one"), it forms a forceful prohibition against revealing the information. The chief captain's command for the young man not to eklaléō the conspiracy's discovery highlights the extreme need for secrecy to prevent the conspirators from altering their plans or escalating their violence.

Verse Breakdown

  • "So the chief captain then let the young man depart": This clause describes the immediate and decisive action of Claudius Lysias. Having received crucial intelligence from Paul's nephew, the chief captain promptly dismisses the young man. The use of "so" (KJV) or "then" (many modern translations) indicates a direct consequence of the information received, signifying the chief captain's quick assessment and response to the grave threat against Paul. His action is efficient and calculated, demonstrating his administrative and military acumen.
  • "and charged him, See thou tell no man that thou hast shewed these things to me": This second clause reveals the specific, urgent instruction given by the chief captain to the young man. The phrase "charged him" (from parangéllō) conveys a strong command. The essence of the charge is absolute secrecy: the young man is strictly forbidden from divulging that he informed the chief captain about the assassination plot. This secrecy was vital to ensure the element of surprise for the Roman escort operation and to prevent the conspirators from realizing their plan had been exposed, thereby avoiding further complications or direct confrontation.

Literary Devices

The narrative in Acts 23:22 employs several Literary Devices. There is a strong sense of Dramatic Irony, as a pagan Roman official, Claudius Lysias, becomes an unwitting instrument of God's protection for His chosen apostle, Paul, against the very religious leaders of Israel. This unexpected alliance highlights God's ability to work through any means to accomplish His purposes. The verse also serves as a point of Narrative Pacing, swiftly moving the plot forward from the revelation of the conspiracy to the chief captain's immediate, decisive action, building anticipation for Paul's transfer. Furthermore, the command for secrecy creates Suspense, emphasizing the dangerous stakes involved and the cunning required to circumvent the plotters. The chief captain's shrewdness in demanding silence also subtly Foreshadows the elaborate and secretive transfer of Paul under heavy guard, which immediately follows in the narrative.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Acts 23:22 powerfully illustrates God's active and intricate providence in the lives of His servants. Even when human plans are fraught with danger and opposition, God orchestrates circumstances, often through unexpected channels like a young relative or a secular authority, to ensure His purposes are fulfilled. The chief captain's seemingly pragmatic decision to protect a Roman citizen becomes a divinely appointed step in Paul's journey to Rome, fulfilling the Lord's promise to Paul. This episode reassures believers that God is sovereign over all human affairs, including political powers and malicious plots, and He remains faithful to His redemptive plan, preserving those through whom His Gospel is proclaimed.

  • Romans 8:28 - "And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose."
  • Proverbs 21:1 - "The king's heart is in the hand of the LORD, as the rivers of water: he turneth it whithersoever he will."
  • Acts 23:11 - "And the night following the Lord stood by him, and said, Be of good cheer, Paul: for as thou hast testified of me in Jerusalem, so must thou bear witness also at Rome."

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Acts 23:22 offers profound lessons for contemporary believers. It reminds us that God's protection is not always miraculous intervention but often comes through ordinary people and unexpected circumstances. Just as Paul's nephew bravely stepped forward and a Roman chief captain diligently performed his duty, God can use anyone, in any position, to advance His kingdom. This should encourage us to be attentive to the seemingly small acts of obedience or kindness that God might call us to, as they could be crucial links in His grand design. Furthermore, the chief captain's demand for secrecy highlights the importance of discernment and discretion in handling sensitive information, recognizing that not every piece of knowledge should be widely broadcast. We are called to trust in God's sovereign hand, knowing that even in the face of grave dangers and conspiracies, He is actively working behind the scenes to protect His people and ensure His purposes prevail. Our role is to remain faithful, courageous, and discerning, allowing God to work through us as He sees fit.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does this account of God's protection for Paul, working through unexpected individuals, challenge or affirm your understanding of divine providence in your own life?
  • In what situations might discretion and secrecy, as exemplified by the chief captain, be a wise and necessary approach for believers today?
  • How does the bravery of Paul's nephew inspire you to act courageously when you encounter injustice or threats, even if it seems like a small act?
  • What does this verse teach us about God's ability to use secular authorities or systems to accomplish His spiritual purposes?

FAQ

Why was the chief captain's command for secrecy so important?

Answer: The chief captain's command for secrecy was crucial for several reasons. First, it maintained the element of surprise. If the conspirators had learned that their plot was discovered, they could have changed their plans, escalated their violence, or attempted to intercept Paul's transfer. Second, it protected the young man who revealed the plot from retribution by the oath-bound assassins. Third, it allowed the chief captain to execute his plan for Paul's safe transfer to Caesarea (as detailed in Acts 23:23-24) without inciting further unrest or open conflict in Jerusalem, which was already a volatile city. His discretion was a strategic move to ensure the success of his mission to protect a Roman citizen.

Who was the "young man" mentioned in the verse?

Answer: The "young man" was Paul's nephew, the son of Paul's sister, as explicitly stated in Acts 23:16. His identity as Paul's relative is significant because it explains how he came to know about the conspiracy and why he was motivated to report it. His brave action was instrumental in saving Paul's life and advancing the narrative towards Paul's eventual journey to Rome.

What happened immediately after this event?

Answer: Immediately after this event, the chief captain took decisive action to transfer Paul out of Jerusalem. In Acts 23:23-24, he summoned two centurions and commanded them to prepare a large escort of 200 soldiers, 70 horsemen, and 200 spearmen to take Paul safely to Caesarea, to Felix the governor. This covert operation, under the cover of night, ensured Paul's protection from the assassins and set the stage for his subsequent trials and appeals.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Acts 23:22, while focusing on Paul's immediate deliverance, ultimately points to the greater Christ-centered reality of divine protection and the preservation of God's redemptive plan. Just as Paul, the messenger of the Gospel, was providentially guarded from those who sought his life, so too is the Church, the body of Christ, protected by its Head. Jesus Himself promised that the gates of hell would not prevail against His Church (Matthew 16:18). This verse reminds us that Christ, who sovereignly rules over all earthly authorities and human schemes (Colossians 1:16-17), ensures the continuation of His mission through His people. Paul's preservation here is not merely for his own sake but for the sake of the Gospel he carried, a Gospel that culminates in Christ's finished work on the cross and His resurrection. Every instance of God's protective hand in the lives of His saints, as seen with Paul, is a testament to the unwavering faithfulness of Christ, who is our ultimate Deliverer and the guarantor of our eternal security (John 10:28-29). The chief captain's actions, though driven by Roman law, were ultimately instruments in the hands of the Lord Jesus, ensuring His witness would reach Rome, just as He had promised Paul (Acts 23:11).

Copy as

Commentary on Acts 23 verses 12–35

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

We have here the story of a plot against the life of Paul; how it was laid, how it was discovered, and how it was defeated.

I. How this plot was laid. They found they could gain nothing by popular tumult, or legal process, and therefore have a recourse to the barbarous method of assassination; they will come upon him suddenly, and stab him, if they can but get him within their reach. So restless is their malice against this good man that, when one design fails, they will turn another stone. Now observe here,

1.Who they were that formed this conspiracy. They were certain Jews that had the utmost degree of indignation against him because he was the apostle of the Gentiles, Act 23:12. And they were more than forty that were in the design, Act 23:13. Lord, how are they increased that trouble me!

2.When the conspiracy was formed: When it was day. Satan had filled their hearts in the night to purpose it, and, as soon as it was day, they got together to prosecute it; answering to the account which the prophet gives of some who work evil upon their beds, and when the morning is light they practise it, and are laid under a woe for it, Mic 2:1. In the night Christ appeared to Paul to protect him, and, when it was day, here were forty men appearing against him to destroy him; they were not up so soon but Christ was up before them God shall help her, and that right early, Psa 46:5.

3.What the conspiracy was. These men banded together in a league, perhaps they called it a holy league; they engaged to stand by one another, and every one, to his power, to be aiding and assisting to murder Paul. It was strange that so many could so soon be got together, and that in Jerusalem too, who were so perfectly lost to all sense of humanity and honour as to engage in so bloody a design. Well might the prophet's complaint be renewed concerning Jerusalem (Isa 1:21): Righteousness has lodged in it, but now murderers. What a monstrous idea must these men have formed of Paul, before they could be capable of forming such a monstrous design against him; they must be made to believe that he was the worst of men, an enemy to God and religion, and the curse and plague of his generation; when really his character was the reverse of all this! What laws of truth and justice so sacred, so strong which malice and bigotry will not break through!

4.How firm they made it, as they thought, that none of them might fly off, upon conscience of the horror of the fact, at second thoughts: They bound themselves under an anathema, imprecating the heaviest curses upon themselves, their souls, bodies, and families, if they did not kill Paul, and so quickly that they would not eat nor drink till they had done it. What a complication of wickedness is here! To design to kill an innocent man, a good man, a useful man, a man that had done them no harm, but was willing to do them all the good he could, was going in the way of Cain, and proved them to be of their father the devil, who was a murderer from the beginning; yet, as if this had been a small matter, (1.) They bound themselves to it. To incline to do evil, and intend to do it, is bad; but to engage to do it is much worse. This is entering into covenant with the devil; it is swearing allegiance to the prince of darkness; it is leaving no room for repentance; nay, it is bidding defiance to it. (2.) They bound one another to it, and did all they could, not only to secure the damnation of their own souls, but of theirs whom they drew into the association. (3.) They showed a great contempt of the providence of God, and a presumption upon it, in that they bound themselves to do such a thing within so short a time as they could continue fasting, without any proviso or reserve for the disposal of an overruling Providence. When we say, Tomorrow we will do this or that, be it ever so lawful and good, forasmuch as we know not what shall be on the morrow, we must add, If the Lord will. But with what face could they insert a proviso for the permission of God's providence when they knew that what they were about was directly against the prohibitions of God's work? (4.) They showed a great contempt of their own souls and bodies; of their own souls in imprecating a curse upon them if they did not proceed in this desperate enterprise (what a woeful dilemma did they throw themselves upon! God certainly meets them with his curse if they do go on in it, and they desire he would if they do not! - nd of their own bodies too (for wilful sinners are the destroyers of both) in tying themselves out from the necessary supports of life till they had accomplished a thing which they could never lawfully do, and perhaps not possibly do. Such language of hell those speak that wish God to damn them, and the devil to take them, if they do not do so and so. As they love cursing, so shall it come unto them. Some think the meaning of this curse was, they would either kill Paul, as an Achan, an accursed thing, a troubler of the camp; or, if they did not do it, they would make themselves accursed before God in his stead. (5.) They showed a most eager desire to compass this matter, and an impatience till was done: not only like David's enemies, that were mad against him, and sworn against him (Psa 102:8), but like the servants of Job against his enemy: O that we had of this flesh! we cannot be satisfied, Job 31:31. Persecutors are said to eat up God's people as they eat bread; it is as much a gratification to them as meat to one that is hungry, Psa 14:4.

5.What method they took to bring it about. There is no getting near Paul in the castle. He is there under the particular protection of the government, and is imprisoned, not, as others are, lest he should do harm, but lest he should have harm done him; and therefore the contrivance is that the chief priests and elders must desire the governor of the castle to let Paul come to them to the council-chamber, to be further examined (they have some questions to ask him, or something to say to him), and the, in his passage from the castle to the council, they would put an end to all disputes about Paul by killing him; thus the plot was laid, Act 23:14, Act 23:15. Having been all day employed in engaging one another to this wickedness, towards evening they come to the principal members of the great sanhedrim, and, though they might have concealed their mean design and yet might have moved them upon some other pretence to send for Paul, they are so confident of their approbation of this villainy, that they are not ashamed nor afraid to own to them that they have bound themselves under a great curse, without consulting the priests first whether they might lawfully do it, that they will eat nothing the next day till they have killed Paul. They design to breakfast the next morning upon his blood. They doubt not but the chief priests will not only countenance them in the design, but will lend them a helping hand, and be their tools to get them an opportunity of killing Paul; nay, and tell a lie for them too, pretending to the chief captain that they would enquire something more perfectly concerning him, when they meant no such thing. What a mean, what an ill opinion had they of their priests, when they could apply to them on such an errand as this! And yet, vile as the proposal was which was made to them (for aught that appears), the priests and elders consented to it, and at the first work, without boggling at it in the least, promised to gratify them. Instead of reproving them, as they ought, for their wicked conspiracy, they bolstered them up in it, because it was against Paul whom they hated; and thus they made themselves partakers of the crime as much as if they had been the first in the conspiracy.

II. How the plot was discovered. We do not find that the plotters, though they took an oath of fidelity, took an oath of secrecy, either because they thought it did not need it (they would every one keep his own counsel) or because they thought they could accomplish it, though it should take wind and be known; but Providence so ordered it that it was brought to light, and so as effectually to be brought to nought. See here,

1.How it was discovered to Paul, Act 23:16. There was a youth that was related to Paul, his sister's son, whose mother probably lived in Jerusalem; and some how or other, we are not told how, he heard of their lying in wait, either overheard them talking of it among themselves, or got intelligence from some that were in the ploy: and he went into the castle, probably, as he used to do, to attend on his uncle, and bring him what he wanted, which gave him a free access to him and he told Paul what he heard. Note, God has many ways of bringing to light the hidden works of darkness; though the contrivers of them dig deep to hide them from the Lord, he can made a bird of the air to carry the voice (Ecc 10:20), or the conspirators' own tongues to betray them.

2.How it was discovered to the chief captain by the young man that told it to Paul. This part of the story is related very particularly, perhaps because the penman was an eye-witness of the prudent and successful management of this affair, and remembered it with a great deal of pleasure. (1.) Paul had got a good interest in the officers that attended, by his prudent peaceable deportment. He could call one of the centurions to him, though a centurion was one in authority, that had soldiers under him, and used to call, not to be called to, and he was ready to come at his call (Act 23:17); and he desired that he would introduce this young man to the chief captain, to give in an information of something that concerned the honour of the government. (2.) The centurion very readily gratified him, Act 23:18. He did not send a common soldier with him, but went himself to keep the young man in countenance, to recommend his errand to the chief captain, and to show his respect to Paul: "Paul the prisoner (this was his title now) called me to him, and prayed me to bring this young man to thee; what his business is I know not, but he has something to say to thee." Note, It is true charity to poor prisoners to act for them as well as to give to them. "I was sick and in prison, and you went on an errand for me," will pass as well in the account as, "I was sick and in prison, and you came unto me, to visit me, or sent me a token." Those that have acquaintance and interest should be ready to use them for the assistance of those that are in distress. This centurion helped to save Paul's life by this piece of civility, which should engage us to be ready to do the like when there is occasion. Open thy mouth for the dumb, Pro 31:8. Those that cannot give a good gift to God's prisoners may yet speak a good word for them. (3.) The chief captain received the information with a great deal of condescension and tenderness, Act 23:19. He took the young man by the hand, as a friend or father, to encourage him, that he might not be put out of countenance, but might be assured of a favourable audience. The notice that is taken of this circumstance should encourage great men to take themselves easy of access to the meanest, upon any errand which may give them an opportunity of doing good - to condescend to those of low estate. This familiarity to which this Roman tribune or colonel admitted Paul's nephew is here upon record to his honour. Let no man think he disparages himself by his humility or charity. He went with him aside privately, that none might hear his business, and asked him, "What is it that thou hast to tell me? Tell me wherein I can be serviceable to Paul." It is probable that the chief captain was the more obliging in this case because he was sensible he had run himself into a premunire in binding Paul, against his privilege as a Roman citizen, which he was willing now to atone for. (4.) The young man delivered his errand to the chief captain very readily and handsomely (Act 23:20, Act 23:21). "The Jews" (he does not say who, lest he should invidiously reflect upon the chief priests and the elders; and his business was to save his uncle's life, not to accuse his enemies) "have agreed to desire thee that thou wouldest bring down Paul tomorrow into the council, presuming that, being so short a distance, thou wilt send him without a guard; but do not thou yield unto them, we have reason to believe thou wilt not when thou knowest the truth; for there lie in wait for him of them more than forty me, who have sworn to be the death of him, and now are they ready looking for a promised from thee, but I have happily got the start of them." (5.) The captain dismissed the young man with a charge of secrecy: See that thou tell no man that thou hast shown these things unto me, Act 23:22. The favours of great men are not always to be boasted of; and not fit to be employed in business. If it should be known that the chief captain had this information brought to him, perhaps they would compass and imagine the death of Paul some other way; "therefore keep it private."

III. How the plot was defeated: The chief captain, finding how implacable and inveterate the malice of the Jews was against Paul, how restless they were in their designs to do him a mischief, and how near he was to become himself accessory to it as a minister, resolves to send him away with all speed out of their reach. He received the intelligence with horror and indignation at the baseness and bloody-mindedness of these Jews; and seemed afraid lest, if he should detain Paul in his castle here, under ever so strong a guard, they would find some way or other to compass their end notwithstanding, either beating the guards or burning the castle; and, whatever came of it, he would, if possible, protect Paul, because he looked upon it that he did not deserve such treatment. What a melancholy observation is it, that the Jewish chief priests, when they knew of this assassination-plot, should countenance it, and assist in it, while a Roman chief captain, purely from a natural sense of justice and humanity, when he knows it, sets himself to baffle it, and puts himself to a great deal of trouble to do it effectually!

1.He orders a considerable detachment of the Roman forces under his command to get ready to go to Caesarea with all expedition, and to bring Paul thither to Felix the governor, where he might sooner expect to have justice done him than by the great sanhedrim at Jerusalem. I see not but the chief captain might, without any unfaithfulness to the duty of his place, have set Paul at liberty, and given him leave to shift for his own safety, for he was never legally committed to his custody as a criminal, he himself owns that nothing was laid to his charge worthy of bonds (Act 23:29), and he ought to have had the same tenderness for his liberty that he had for his life; but he feared that this would have incensed the Jews too much against him. Or perhaps, finding Paul to be a very extraordinary man, he was proud to have him his prisoner, and under his protection; and the mighty parade with which he sent him off intimates as much. Two centurions, or captains of the hundreds, are employed in this business, Act 23:23, Act 23:24. They must get ready two hundred soldiers, probably those under their own command, to go to Caesarea; and with these seventy horse, and two hundred spearmen besides, which some think were the chief captain's guards; whether they were horse or foot is not certain, most probably foot, as pikemen for the protection of the horse. See how justly God brought the Jewish nation under the Roman yoke, when such a party of the Roman army was necessary to restrain them from the most execrable villanies! There needed not all this force, there needed not any of it, to keep Paul from being rescued by his friends; ten times this force would not have kept him from being rescued by an angel, if it had pleased God to work his deliverance that way, as he had sometimes done; but, (1.) The chief captain designed hereby to expose the Jews, as a headstrong tumultuous people, that would not be kept within the bounds of duty and decency by the ordinary ministers of justice, but needed to be awed by such a train as this; and, hearing how many were in the conspiracy against Paul, he thought less would not serve to defeat their attempt. (2.) God designed hereby to encourage Paul; for, being thus attended, he was not only kept safely in the hands of his friends, but out of the hands of his enemies. Yet Paul did not desire such a guard, any more than Ezra did (Ezr 8:22), and for the same reason, because he trusted in God's all-sufficiency; it was owing, however, to the governor's own care. But he was also made considerable; thus his bonds in Christ were made manifest all the country over (Phi 1:13); and, son great an honour having been put upon them before by the prediction of them, it was agreeable enough that they should be thus honourably attended, that the brethren in the Lord might wax the more confident by his bonds, when they same him rather guarded as the patriot of his country than guarded against as the pest of his country, and so great a preacher made so great a prisoner. When his enemies hate him, and I doubt his friends neglect him, then does a Roman tribune patronise him, and carefully provide, [1.] For his ease: Let them provide beasts, that they may set Paul on. Had his Jewish persecutors ordered his removal by habeas corpus to Caesarea, they would have made him run on foot, or dragged him thither in a cart, or on a sledge, or have horsed him behind one of the troopers; but the chief captain treats him like a gentleman, though he was his prisoner, and orders him a good horse to ride upon, not at all afraid that he should ride away. Nay, the order being that they should provide, not a beast, but beasts, to set Paul on, we must either suppose that he was allowed so great a piece of state as to have a led horse, or more, that if he did not like one he might take to another; or (as some expositors conjecture) that he had beasts assigned him for his friends and companions, as many as pleased to go along with him, to divert him in his journey, and to minister to him. [2.] For his security. They have a strict charge given them by their commander in chief to bring him safely to Felix the governor, to whom he is consigned, and who was supreme in all civil affairs among the Jews, as this chief captain was in military affairs. The Roman historians speak much of this Felix, as a man of mean extraction, but that raised himself by his shifts to be governor of Judea, in the execution of which office, Tacitus, Hist. 5, says this of him: Per omnem saevitiam ac libidinem jus regium servili ingenio exercui - He used royal power with a servile genius, and in connection with all the varieties of cruelty and lust. To the judgement of such a man as this is poor Paul turned over; and yet better so than in the hands of Ananias the high priest! Now, a prisoner, thus upon his deliverance by course of law, ought to be protected as well as a prince.

2.The chief captain orders, for the greater security of Paul, that he be taken away at the third hour of the night, which some understand of three hours after sun-set, that, it being now after the feast of pentecost (that is, in the midst of summer), they might have the cool of the night to march in. Others understand it of three hours after midnight, in the third watch, about three in the morning, that they might have the day before them, and might get out of Jerusalem before Paul's enemies were stirring, and so might prevent any popular tumult, and leave them to roar when they rose, like a lion disappointed of his prey.

3.He writes a letter to Felix the governor of this province, by which he discharges himself from any further care about Paul, and leaves the whole matter with Felix. This letter is here inserted totidem verbi - erbatim, Act 23:25. It is probable that Luke the historian had a copy of it by him, having attended Paul in this remove. Now in this epistle we may observe,

(1.)The compliments he passes upon the governor, Act 23:26. He is the most excellent governor Felix, this title being given him of course, his excellency, etc. He sends him greeting, wishes him all health and prosperity; may he rejoice, may he ever rejoice.

(2.)The just and fair account which he gives him of Paul's case: [1.] That he was one that the Jews had a pique against: They had taken him, and would have killed him; and perhaps Felix knew the temper of the Jews so well that he did not think much the worse of him for that, Act 23:27. [2.] That he had protected him because he was a Roman: "When they were about to kill him, I came with an army, a considerable body of men, and rescued him;" which action for a citizen of Rome would recommend him to the Roman governor. [3.] That he could not understand the merits of his cause, nor what it was that made him so odious to the Jews, and obnoxious to their ill-will. He took the proper method to know: he brought him forth into their council (Act 23:28), to be examined there, hoping that, either from their complaints or his own confession, he would learn something of the ground of all this clamour, but he found that he was accused of questions of their law (Act 23:29), about the hope of the resurrection of the dead, Act 23:6. This chief captain was a man of sense and honour, and had good principles in him of justice and humanity; and yet see how slightly he speaks of another world, and the great things of that world, as if that were a question, which is of undoubted certainty, and which both sides agreed in, except the Sadducees; and as if that were a question only of their law, which is of the utmost concern to all mankind! Or perhaps he refers rather to the question about their rituals than about their doctrinals, and the quarrel he perceived they had with him was for lessening the credit and obligation of their ceremonial law, which he looked upon as a thing not worth speaking of. The Romans allowed the nations they conquered the exercise of their own religion, and never offered to impose theirs upon them; yet, as conservators of the public peace, they wound not suffer them, under colour of their religion, to abuse their neighbours. [4.] That thus far he understood that there was nothing laid to his charge worthy of death or of bonds, much less proved or made out against him. The Jews had, by their wickedness, made themselves odious to the world, had polluted their own honour and profaned their own crown, had brought disgrace upon their church, their law, and their holy place, and then they cry out against Paul, as having diminished the reputation of them; and was this a crime worthy of death or bonds?

(3.)His referring Paul's case to Felix (Act 23:30): "When it was told me that the Jews laid wait for the man, to kill him, without any legal process against him, I sent straightaway to thee, who art the most proper person to head the cause, and give judgment upon it, and let his accusers go after him, if they please, and say before thee what they have against him, for, being bred a soldier, I will never pretend to be a judge, and so farewell."

4.Paul was accordingly conducted to Caesarea; the soldiers got him safely out of Jerusalem by night, and left the conspirators to consider whether they should east and drink or no before they had killed Paul; and, if they would not repent of the wickedness of their oath as it was against Paul, they were now at leisure to repent of the rashness of it as it was against themselves; if any of them did starve themselves to death, in consequence of their oath and vexation at their disappointment, they fell unpitied. Paul was conducted to Antipatris, which was seventeen miles from Jerusalem, and about the mid-way to Caesarea, Act 23:31. Thence the two hundred foot-soldiers, and the two hundred spearmen, returned back to Jerusalem, to their quarters in the castle; for, having conducted Paul out of danger, there needed not strong a guard, but the horsemen might serve to bring him to Caesarea, and would do it with more expedition; this they did, not only to save their own labour, but their master's charge; and it is an example to servants, not only to act obediently according to their masters' orders, but to act prudently, so as may be most for their masters' interest.

5.He was delivered into the hands of Felix, as his prisoner, Act 23:33. The officers presented the letter, and Paul with it, to Felix, and so discharged themselves of their trust. Paul had never affected acquaintance or society with great men, but with the disciples, wherever he came; yet Providence overrules his sufferings so as by them to give him an opportunity of witnessing to Christ before great men; and so Christ had foretold concerning his disciples, that they should be brought before rulers and kings for his sake, for a testimony against them, Mar 13:9. The governor enquired of what province of the empire the prisoner originally was, and was told that he was a native of Cilicia, Mar 13:34; and, (1.) He promises him a speedy trial (Act 23:35): "I will hear thee when thing accusers have come, and will have an ear open to both sides, as becomes a judge." (2.) He ordered him into custody, that he should be kept a prisoner in Herod's judgment-hall, in some apartment belonging to that palace which was denominated from Herod the Great, who built it. There he had opportunity of acquainting himself with great men that attended the governor's court, and, no doubt, he improved what acquaintance he got there to the best purposes.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 12–35. Public domain.
Copy as
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on Acts 49
"Then Paul called one of the centurions unto him, and said, Bring this young man unto the tribune: For he hath a certain thing to tell him. So he took him, and brought him to the tribune, and said, Paul the prisoner called me unto him, and prayed me to bring this young man unto thee, who hath something to say unto thee. Then the tribune took him by the hand, and went with him aside privately, and asked him, What is that thou hast to tell me?" Again he is saved by man's forethought. And observe: Paul lets no man learn this, not even the centurion, that the matter might not become known. And the centurion having come, reported to the tribune. And it is well done of the tribune also, that he bids him keep it secret, that it might not become known.
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on Acts 49
"So the tribune then let the young man depart, and charged him, See thou tell no man that thou hast showed these things to me." Moreover he gives his orders to the centurions only, at the time when the thing was to be done: and so Paul is sent into Caesarea, that there too he might discourse in a greater theatre and before a more splendid audience: that so the Jews may not be able to say, "If we had seen Paul, we would have believed-if we had heard him teaching." Therefore this excuse too is cut off from them.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Acts 23:22 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.