TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 2 Samuel 12:15–25. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Nathan, having delivered his message, staid not at court, but went home, probably to pray for David, to whom he had been preaching. God, in making use of him as an instrument to bring David to repentance, and as the herald both of mercy and judgment, put an honour upon the ministry, and magnified his word above all his name. David named one of his sons by Bath-sheba Nathan, in honour of this prophet (Ch1 3:5), and it was that son of whom Christ, the great prophet, lineally descended, Luk 3:31. When Nathan retired, David, it is probable, retired likewise, and penned the 51st Psalm, in which (though he had been assured that his sin was pardoned) he prays earnestly for pardon, and greatly laments his sin; for then will true penitents be ashamed of what they have done when God is pacified towards them, Eze 16:63.
Here is, I. The child's illness: The Lord struck it, and it was very sick, perhaps with convulsions, or some other dreadful distemper, Sa2 12:15. The diseases and death of infants that have not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, especially as they are sometimes sadly circumstanced, are sensible proofs of the original sin in which they are conceived.
II.David's humiliation under this token of God's displeasure, and the intercession he made with God for the life of the child (Sa2 12:16, Sa2 12:17): He fasted, and lay all night upon the earth, and would not suffer any of his attendants either to feed him or help him up. This was an evidence of the truth of his repentance. For,
1.Hereby it appeared that he was willing to bear the shame of his sin, to have it ever before him, and to be continually upbraided with it; for this child would be a continual memorandum of it, both to himself and others, if he lived: and therefore he was so far from desiring its death, as most in such circumstances do, that he prayed earnestly for its life. True penitents patiently bear the reproach of their youth, and of their youthful lusts, Jer 31:19.
2.A very tender compassionate spirit appeared in this, and great humanity, above what is commonly found in men, especially men of war, towards little children, even their own; and this was another sign of a broken contrite spirit. Those that are penitent will be pitiful.
3.He discovered, in this, a great concern for another world, which is an evidence of repentance. Nathan had told him that certainly the child should die; yet, while it is in the reach of prayer, he earnestly intercedes with God for it, chiefly (as we may suppose) that its soul might be safe and happy in another world, and that his sin might not come against the child, and that it might not fare the worse for that in the future state.
4.He discovered, in this, a holy dread of God and of his displeasure. He deprecated the death of the child chiefly as it was a token of God's anger against him and his house, and was inflicted in performance of a threatening; therefore he prayed thus earnestly that, if it were the will of God, the child might live, because that would be to him a token of God's being reconciled to him. Lord, chasten me not in thy hot displeasure. Psa 6:1.
III.The death of the child:
It died on the seventh day (Sa2 12:18), when it was seven days old, and therefore not circumcised, which David might perhaps interpret as a further token of God's displeasure, that it died before it was brought under the seal of the covenant; yet he does not therefore doubt of its being happy for the benefits of the covenant do not depend upon the seals. David's servants, judging of him by themselves, were afraid to tell him that the child was dead, concluding that then he would disquiet himself most of all; so that he knew not till he asked, Sa2 12:19.
IV.David's wonderful calmness and composure of mind when he understood the child was dead. Observe,
1.What he did.
(1.)He laid aside the expressions of his sorrow, washed and anointed himself, and called for clean linen, that he might decently appear before God in his house.
(2.)He went up to the tabernacle and worshipped, like Job when he heard of the death of his children. He went to acknowledge the hand of God in the affliction, and to humble himself under it, and to submit to his holy will in it, to thank God that he himself was spared and his sin pardoned, and to pray that God would not proceed in his controversy with him, nor stir up all his wrath. Is any afflicted? Let him pray. Weeping must never hinder worshipping.
(3.)Then he went to his own house and refreshed himself, as one who found benefit by his religion in the day of his affliction; for, having worshipped, he did eat, and his countenance was no more sad.
2.The reason he gave for what he did. His servants thought it strange that he should afflict himself so for the sickness of the child and yet take the death of it so easily, and asked him the reason of it (Sa2 12:21), in answer to which he gives this plain account of his conduct,
(1.)That while the child was alive he thought it his duty to importune the divine favour towards it, Sa2 12:22. Nathan had indeed said the child should die, but, for aught that he knew, the threatening might be conditional, as that concerning Hezekiah: upon his great humiliation and earnest prayer, he that had so often heard the voice of his weeping might be pleased to reverse the sentence, and spare the child: Who can tell whether God will yet be gracious to me? God gives us leave to be earnest with him in prayer for particular blessings, from a confidence in his power and general mercy, though we have no particular promise to build upon: we cannot be sure, yet let us pray, for who can tell but God will be gracious to us, in this or that particular? When our relations and friends have fallen sick, the prayer of faith has prevailed much; while there is life there is hope, and, while there is hope, there is room for prayer.
(2.)That now the child was dead he thought it as much his duty to be satisfied in the divine disposal concerning it (Sa2 12:23): Now, wherefore should I fast? Two things checked his grief: - [1.] I cannot bring him back again; and again, He shall not return to me. Those that are dead are out of the reach of prayer; nor can our tears profit them. We can neither weep nor pray them back to this life. Wherefore then should we fast? To what purpose is this waste? Yet David fasted and wept for Jonathan when he was dead, in honour to him. [2.] I shall go to him. First, To him to the grave. Note, The consideration of our own death should moderate our sorrow at the death of our relations. It is the common lot; instead of mourning for their death, we should think of our own: and, whatever loss we have of them now, we shall die shortly, and go to them. Secondly, To him to heaven, to a state of blessedness, which even the Old Testament saints had some expectation of. Godly parents have great reason to hope concerning their children that die in infancy that it is well with their souls in the other world; for the promise is to us and to our seed, which shall be performed to those that do not put a bar in their own door, as infants do not. Favores sunt ampliandi - Favours received should produce the hope of more. God calls those his children that are born unto him; and, if they be his, he will save them. This may comfort us when our children are removed from us by death, they are better provided for, both in work and wealth, than they could have been in this world. We shall be with them shortly, to part no more.
V.The birth of Solomon.
Though David's marrying Bath-sheba had displeased the Lord, yet he was not therefore commanded to divorce her; so far from this that God gave him that son by her on whom the covenant of royalty should be entailed. Bath-sheba, no doubt, was greatly afflicted with the sense of her sin and the tokens of God's displeasure. But, God having restored to David the joys of his salvation, he comforted her with the same comforts with which he himself was comforted of God (Sa2 12:24): He comforted Bath-sheba. And both he and she had reason to be comforted in the tokens of God's reconciliation to them,
1.Inasmuch as, by his providence, he gave them a son, not as the former, who was given in anger and taken away in wrath, but a child graciously given, and written among the living in Jerusalem. They called him Solomon - peaceful, because his birth was a token of God's being at peace with them, because of the prosperity which was entailed upon him, and because he was to be a type of Christ, the prince of peace. God had removed one son from them, but now gave them another instead of him, like Seth instead of Abel, Gen 4:25. Thus God often balances the griefs of his people with comforts in the same thing wherein he hath afflicted them, setting the one over-against the other. David had very patiently submitted to the will of God in the death of the other child, and now God made up the loss of that, abundantly to his advantage, in the birth of this. The way to have our creature-comforts either continued or restored, or the loss of them made up some other way, is cheerfully to resign them to God.
2.Inasmuch as, by his grace, he particularly owned and favoured that son: The Lord loved him (Sa2 12:24 and Sa2 12:25), ordered him, by the prophet Nathan, to be called Jedidiah - Beloved of the Lord: though a seed of evil-doers (for such David and Bath-sheba were), yet so well ordered was the covenant, and the crown entailed by it, that it took away all attainders and corruption of blood, signifying that those who were by nature children of wrath and disobedience should, by the covenant of grace, not only be reconciled, but made favourites. And, in this name, he typified Jesus Christ, that blessed Jedidiah, the son of God's love, concerning whom God declared again and again, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.
Historical interpretation
Historical Reception
2 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
And I do not say this to overturn fasting (God forbid!) but to exhort you that with fasting you do that which is better than fasting, the abstaining from all evil. David also sinned. Let us see then how he too repented. Three days he sat on ashes. But this he did not for the sin’s sake but for the child’s, being as yet stupefied with that affliction. But he wiped away the sin by other means, by humbleness, contrition of heart, compunction of soul, by falling into this sin no more, by remembering it always, by bearing thankfully every thing that befalls him, by sparing those that grieve him, by forbearing to requite those who conspire against him; yes, even preventing those who desire to do this.
How particularly difficult it is to atone for the evil deed of handing over the name of the Lord to the blasphemy of the heathen, we are instructed by the example of the most blessed David who, because of the intercession of his acts of justice, deserved to evade eternal punishment for his offenses through one confession only. Yet he, with penance as his protector, was unable to obtain full pardon for his sin. When Nathan the prophet had said to David, who was confessing his own sins to him, “The Lord has taken away your sin, you shall not die,” he added immediately, “nevertheless, because you have given occasion to the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme, for this word, the child that is born to you, shall die.”And what happened next? Having laid aside his crown and put away his jewels, all splendor of royal dignity being removed, he was relieved of the purple. For all his sins he shut himself up alone, weeping, filthy in sackcloth, soaked in tears and soiled with ashes, and sought the life of his little child with the voice of many lamentations and beat upon the Most Holy God with great fervor or prayer. Thus asking and imploring, he believed he could in this manner obtain what he sought from God. Yet he was unable to obtain his request through what is the most forceful aid to those who ask.
From this it can be understood that there is no crime deserving of greater guilt than to give to the heathen a reason for blaspheming. For, whoever has erred gravely without giving cause for blasphemy to others brings damnation to himself only, but he who makes others blaspheme drags many to death with himself, he will, of necessity, be guilty of as many as he shall have drawn into guilt. Not only this, whatever sinner so sins that he does not cause others to blaspheme by his sin, his sin is injurious only to him who sins, but does not insult the holy name of God with the sacrilegious curse of those who blaspheme. But he who, by his sin, causes others to blaspheme, his sin is, of necessity, beyond the measure of human crime, because he has done unthinkable harm to God through the curses of many.
Continue studying 2 Samuel 12:15 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
2 Samuel 12:15 marks the immediate and tragic fulfillment of divine judgment pronounced by the prophet Nathan upon King David for his egregious sins of adultery with Bathsheba and the murder of Uriah. As Nathan departs, the narrative swiftly turns to the Lord's direct intervention, striking the child born of David's illicit union, causing it to become gravely ill, thereby initiating the promised temporal consequences upon David's household despite his confession and the sparing of his own life. This verse underscores the gravity of sin and the unwavering justice of God, even amidst His mercy.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is deeply embedded in the intense climax of Nathan's confrontation with King David following David's sins concerning Bathsheba and Uriah. The preceding narrative in 2 Samuel 11 details David's adultery and his calculated murder of Uriah, Bathsheba's husband. In 2 Samuel 12:1-12, Nathan delivers a powerful parable that leads David to unwittingly condemn himself. Upon David's heartfelt confession in 2 Samuel 12:13, Nathan declares God's forgiveness for David's life, stating, "The LORD also hath put away thy sin; thou shalt not die." However, this declaration of forgiveness is immediately followed by a severe pronouncement in 2 Samuel 12:14: because David's actions had "given great occasion to the enemies of the LORD to blaspheme," the child born of this illicit union would surely die. Verse 15, therefore, is not merely a consequence but the swift, undeniable, and direct fulfillment of this specific prophecy, underscoring the immediate and tangible nature of God's word and judgment. The narrative flow emphasizes the direct link between David's sin, God's pronouncement, and the tragic outcome, setting the stage for further turmoil within David's household as prophesied in 2 Samuel 12:10-11.
Historical & Cultural Context
In ancient Israel, especially within the context of the Davidic monarchy, the king's actions carried immense weight, not only personally but corporately. A king was understood to be God's anointed, and his moral conduct reflected upon the entire nation and the honor of God. David's sins of adultery and murder were not merely private transgressions but public affronts to God's law and the covenant, particularly as they involved a loyal soldier and his wife. The concept of "corporate solidarity" meant that the sins of a leader could bring consequences upon their family or even the community. The role of a prophet like Nathan was crucial; they served as God's direct voice, even to the most powerful king, holding him accountable to divine standards. The immediate illness and death of the child, attributed directly to "the LORD struck," would have been understood by the original audience as a clear act of divine judgment, demonstrating God's sovereignty over life and death and His unwavering commitment to justice. This challenging theme of the innocent suffering for the sins of the guilty, while difficult for modern sensibilities, was a recognized aspect of divine judgment in the Old Testament, emphasizing the pervasive and devastating nature of sin.
Key Themes
This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within the book of 2 Samuel and broader biblical theology. It highlights the Divine Judgment and Consequences of Sin, demonstrating that while God is merciful and offers forgiveness for the eternal penalty of sin (as David's life was spared, according to 2 Samuel 12:13), there are often severe temporal consequences that even sincere repentance cannot always avert. This underscores the gravity of sin in God's eyes and the principle that "whatever a man sows, that he will also reap" (Galatians 6:7). It also emphasizes God's Sovereignty and Justice, as the text explicitly states "the LORD struck the child," leaving no doubt that this was a direct, intentional act of divine justice, not a natural occurrence. The tragic suffering and death of an innocent child further illustrate the Far-Reaching Impact of Sin, showing how personal transgressions can have devastating ripple effects, impacting not only the sinner but also those around them, particularly family members, a theme echoed in Exodus 20:5. Finally, the verse serves as a stark example of the Fulfillment of Prophecy, reinforcing the truthfulness and reliability of God's word spoken through His prophets, as the judgment pronounced in 2 Samuel 12:14 is immediately and undeniably realized.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
A primitive root meaning "to push, gore, defeat, stub (the toe), inflict (a disease)." In this context, it signifies a direct, forceful, and often punitive act by God, implying a divine smiting, a plague, or a severe affliction. Its use here leaves no ambiguity: the child's illness was not a natural sickness but a direct, divinely orchestrated judgment, a deliberate act of divine intervention to bring about the prophesied consequence. This term is often employed to describe God's judgment against His enemies or against those who violate His covenant, as seen when God "struck" the Egyptians with plagues (Exodus 12:23) or when He "struck" Uzzah for touching the ark (2 Samuel 6:7).
Meaning "something born, i.e. a lad or offspring." The term simply means "child" or "boy." Its significance here lies in its innocence. The text explicitly states "the child that Uriah's wife bare unto David," highlighting the illicit origin and the tragic irony that an innocent life is the immediate recipient of the temporal judgment for David's sin. The use of "child" evokes pathos and underscores the severity of the consequences for David's actions, which extended beyond himself, impacting the most vulnerable member of his household.
A primitive root meaning "to be frail, feeble, or (figuratively) melancholy; desperate(-ly wicked), incurable, woeful." This word describes the physical manifestation of the divine striking. The KJV translates it as "very sick," indicating a severe and critical condition. While the Hebrew term itself means "sick" or "frail," the broader context and the subsequent narrative (where the child dies) strongly imply a terminal illness, a sickness unto death, which is the direct result of God's punitive action.
Verse Breakdown
"And Nathan departed unto his house."
This clause marks a crucial transition in the narrative. Nathan, having delivered the divine message of both forgiveness and judgment, completes his prophetic mission to David. His departure signifies the conclusion of the direct confrontation and the immediate commencement of the fulfillment of the prophecy. It underscores the finality and inevitability of the impending consequences, as God's word, once spoken, will surely come to pass.
"And the LORD struck the child that Uriah's wife bare unto David,"
This is the core of the verse, explicitly stating the divine agent ("the LORD," H3068, Yᵉhôvâh) and the action ("struck," H5062, nâgaph). The direct agency of God emphasizes His sovereignty and active involvement in upholding justice within His covenant. The phrase "the child that Uriah's wife bare unto David" serves as a stark and painful reminder of the specific sin (adultery with Bathsheba, Uriah's wife, H802, ʼishshâh) for which this judgment is exacted, linking the consequence directly to the transgression and highlighting the public nature of David's sin.
"and it was very sick."
This clause describes the immediate, tangible manifestation of the divine striking. The child's severe illness is the direct evidence of God's judgment, confirming the prophecy of the child's death from 2 Samuel 12:14. The Hebrew term for "sick" (H605, ʼânash) combined with the context, indicates a grave, life-threatening condition, emphasizing the severity and the fatal nature of the illness as a direct consequence of divine action.
Literary Devices
The passage employs several potent literary devices to convey its message with maximum impact. Foreshadowing is powerfully evident in Nathan's explicit prophecy in 2 Samuel 12:14, which states the child would surely die, making the events of verse 15 a direct and immediate fulfillment. This creates a sense of grim inevitability. Irony is profoundly present in the suffering of the innocent child, who is the product of David's sin, yet bears the immediate and devastating consequence. This highlights the tragic ripple effect of sin, where the innocent often suffer due to the transgressions of others. Divine Intervention is explicit and undeniable, with the text stating "the LORD struck the child," leaving no room for naturalistic explanations and underscoring God's active, sovereign role in administering justice. Finally, the narrative evokes a strong sense of Pathos, as the reader is confronted with the suffering and impending death of an innocent infant, a direct result of the king's grievous moral failures, thereby intensifying the emotional impact and the gravity of David's actions.
Theological and Thematic Connections
This verse is a profound theological statement on the nature of divine justice and the consequences of sin. It demonstrates that while God is merciful and offers forgiveness for the eternal penalty of sin upon genuine repentance, He is also absolutely holy and just, and sin carries real, often painful, temporal consequences. David's life was spared, but the immediate and devastating loss of his child served as a public and personal testament to the gravity of his actions, particularly because his sin had caused "the enemies of the LORD to blaspheme" (2 Samuel 12:14). This passage challenges the simplistic notion that forgiveness negates all earthly repercussions, teaching us that God's justice operates on multiple levels, ensuring that His moral order is upheld and His name is vindicated. It underscores that God's holiness demands a response to sin, even when mercy is extended.
Reflection and Application
The tragic events of 2 Samuel 12:15 serve as a sobering and enduring reminder of the profound and far-reaching consequences of sin. While David received God's forgiveness for the eternal penalty of his transgression, the temporal repercussions were severe and painful, extending even to an innocent life. This passage compels us to consider the gravity of our own choices, recognizing that our actions, especially those that violate God's commands, do not exist in a vacuum. They can create ripple effects that impact not only ourselves but also our families, communities, and even the reputation of God's name in the world. It calls us to a deeper understanding of God's character, which encompasses both boundless mercy and unwavering justice. We are challenged to cultivate a profound reverence for God's holiness, to take sin seriously, and to live with integrity, knowing that true repentance involves not only confessing our sins but also accepting the consequences, trusting in God's ultimate wisdom and sovereignty even in the midst of pain. This narrative invites us to examine our own lives for areas where we might be minimizing sin or failing to consider its potential impact on others.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why did an innocent child have to suffer and die for David's sin?
This is one of the most challenging aspects of this passage, raising profound theological questions about divine justice and the suffering of the innocent. From an Old Testament perspective, several factors are at play. First, it underscores the extreme gravity of David's sin—adultery and murder—which was a public affront to God's law and brought "great occasion to the enemies of the LORD to blaspheme" (2 Samuel 12:14). God's judgment was a public vindication of His holiness and a demonstration that even His anointed king was not above the law. Second, the concept of corporate solidarity was prevalent in ancient Israel, where the actions of a leader or family head could bring consequences upon the entire household or community. While the child was personally innocent of David's sin, it was part of David's house, and the judgment was directed at David's house as a consequence of his actions, illustrating that sin has devastating ripple effects beyond the individual transgressor. Finally, while the child died, the biblical narrative implies that the child was received by God, as David later states with hope, "I shall go to him, but he shall not return to me" (2 Samuel 12:23), suggesting a merciful reception in the afterlife for those who die in infancy, a common theological understanding.
Does God still punish sin in this direct, physical way today?
While God remains sovereign and just, the nature of divine judgment and its manifestation have shifted significantly under the New Covenant, inaugurated by Christ. In the Old Testament, God often intervened directly and visibly with physical consequences for sin, particularly within the nation of Israel as a covenant people, to demonstrate His holiness and enforce His law. However, with the coming of Christ, the focus of God's judgment for sin was decisively placed upon Jesus, who bore the full wrath of God for the sins of humanity on the cross (Romans 5:8). For those who are in Christ, the ultimate penalty of sin (eternal separation from God) has been paid. While believers may still experience natural consequences of their choices, or even divine discipline (as a loving Father corrects His children, Hebrews 12:6), the direct, physical "striking" as a punitive judgment for individual sin in the same manner as 2 Samuel 12:15 is not the typical pattern for believers under the New Covenant. The primary consequence of unconfessed sin for believers is a broken fellowship with God and a loss of spiritual vitality, not necessarily physical death as a direct divine punishment. For unbelievers, the ultimate judgment for sin is reserved for eternity (John 3:18).
What does this passage teach us about God's character?
This passage reveals God as a God of absolute holiness and justice. He cannot overlook sin, especially when it is so grievous and public, bringing reproach to His name. His actions here demonstrate His unwavering commitment to His moral law and His determination to uphold righteousness, ensuring that His name is vindicated. However, it also reveals His profound mercy and forgiveness. Despite David's heinous sins of adultery and murder, God spares David's life and does not remove the kingdom from him immediately, as He did with Saul. This highlights that God's justice is tempered with mercy, and He offers genuine forgiveness to those who truly repent, even when the temporal consequences are severe. The passage shows God as sovereign over life and death, actively involved in the affairs of humanity, and ultimately working His purposes, even through painful consequences, to bring about righteousness and honor His name. It portrays a God who is both righteous Judge and compassionate Redeemer.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The tragic narrative of 2 Samuel 12:15, where an innocent child suffers the consequences of another's sin, finds its ultimate and redemptive fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. While the child in this passage died as a direct judgment for David's sin, Jesus, the perfect and innocent Lamb of God, willingly bore the full weight of humanity's sin, suffering and dying not for His own transgressions, but for ours. Just as the child was "struck" by the Lord, so too was Christ "smitten by God, and afflicted" (Isaiah 53:4) for our iniquities. He became the ultimate innocent victim, not to punish a specific individual's sin, but to provide atonement for the sins of the entire world. Through His sacrifice on the cross, Jesus absorbed the divine judgment that we deserved, so that those who believe in Him might be spared the eternal consequences of their sin (Romans 6:23). He is the one who "knew no sin, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him" (2 Corinthians 5:21). Thus, while 2 Samuel 12:15 painfully illustrates the devastating effects of sin and God's just response, the cross of Christ reveals God's ultimate solution: a substitutionary sacrifice where the truly innocent suffers so that the guilty might find forgiveness, reconciliation, and eternal life (Romans 5:8). This profound truth transforms the Old Testament narrative from a story of judgment into a foreshadowing of God's ultimate redemptive plan through His Son.