Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And the king called for Jehoiada the chief, and said unto him, Why hast thou not required of the Levites to bring in out of Judah and out of Jerusalem the collection, according to the commandment of Moses the servant of the LORD, and of the congregation of Israel, for the tabernacle of witness?
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And the king H4428 called H7121 for Jehoiada H3077 the chief H7218, and said H559 unto him, Why hast thou not required H1875 of the Levites H3881 to bring in H935 out of Judah H3063 and out of Jerusalem H3389 the collection H4864, according to the commandment of Moses H4872 the servant H5650 of the LORD H3068, and of the congregation H6951 of Israel H3478, for the tabernacle H168 of witness H5715?
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
the king summoned Y'hoyada the chief and said to him, "Why haven't you demanded that the L'vi'im bring in from Y'hudah and Yerushalayim the tax prescribed by Moshe the servant of ADONAI and by the community of Isra'el, for the tent of the testimony?"
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
So the king called Jehoiada the high priest and said, “Why have you not required the Levites to bring from Judah and Jerusalem the tax imposed by Moses the servant of the LORD and by the assembly of Israel for the Tent of the Testimony?”
Ask
American Standard Version
And the king called for Jehoiada the chief, and said unto him, Why hast thou not required of the Levites to bring in out of Judah and out of Jerusalem the tax of Moses the servant of Jehovah, and of the assembly of Israel, for the tent of the testimony?
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The king called for Jehoiada the chief, and said to him, “Why haven’t you required of the Levites to bring in the tax of Moses the servant of the LORD, and of the assembly of Israel, out of Judah and out of Jerusalem, for the tent of the testimony?”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Therefore the King called Iehoiada, the chiefe, and said vnto him, Why hast thou not required of the Leuites to bring in out of Iudah and Ierusalem the taxe of Moses the seruant of the Lord, and of the Congregation of Israel, for the Tabernacle of the testimonie?
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And the king calleth for Jehoiada the head, and saith to him, `Wherefore hast thou not required of the Levites to bring in out of Judah and out of Jerusalem the tribute of Moses, servant of Jehovah, and of the assembly of Israel, for the tent of the testimony?
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

King Joash of Judah confronts Jehoiada, the chief priest, regarding the significant delay in collecting the mandated funds from the people of Judah and Jerusalem for the repair and maintenance of the Temple. This collection was not an arbitrary levy but was explicitly commanded by the Mosaic Law, underscoring the king's concern for adherence to divine command and diligent stewardship of God's dwelling place, referred to here by its ancient designation as the "tabernacle of witness." The verse highlights the king's accountability for the spiritual well-being of the nation and the priest's responsibility to execute God's ordinances.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is strategically placed within the narrative of King Joash's reign, specifically after an initial period of righteousness and a command for Temple repair. 2 Chronicles 24:1-3 establishes Joash's young age at ascension and the profound influence of Jehoiada, who had hidden and protected him from Athaliah's murderous purge, as detailed in 2 Chronicles 22:10-12. Joash's early reign is characterized by a desire to restore the Temple, which had suffered neglect and desecration during Athaliah's idolatrous rule, as explicitly stated in 2 Chronicles 24:7. 2 Chronicles 24:5 records Joash's direct command to the Levites to collect funds for the Temple's restoration. Verse 6, however, reveals a significant lapse in execution, prompting the king's direct inquiry and challenge to Jehoiada, setting the stage for the revised collection method described in 2 Chronicles 24:8-14. This confrontation marks a turning point, revealing a potential complacency or inefficiency in the Temple administration that the king felt compelled to address directly.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The historical backdrop is the early reign of King Joash (c. 835-796 BC) in Judah. The Temple in Jerusalem, originally built by Solomon, was the central place of worship and national identity for the kingdom of Judah. Its upkeep was not merely a matter of structural maintenance but a profound theological imperative, reflecting the nation's commitment to the covenant with Yahweh. The "commandment of Moses" likely refers to the half-shekel temple tax (e.g., Exodus 30:11-16), a perpetual offering for the service of the Tabernacle, which was later applied to the Temple. This tax was a communal responsibility, ensuring the sanctuary's upkeep and providing atonement for the people. The cultural expectation was that the religious leadership, particularly the Levites and priests, would diligently oversee such matters, especially given the Temple's foundational significance to Israelite identity and worship. Joash's confrontation highlights a breakdown in this expected diligence, necessitating royal intervention.
  • Key Themes: This verse contributes to several overarching themes in 2 Chronicles. Firstly, it underscores the theme of accountability in leadership, demonstrating that even righteous leaders like Jehoiada are not exempt from scrutiny regarding their duties, particularly when it pertains to God's house. The Chronicler frequently emphasizes the king's role in upholding the Mosaic Law and ensuring proper worship, as seen in the reigns of other faithful kings like Hezekiah (2 Chronicles 29) and Josiah (2 Chronicles 34). Secondly, it emphasizes obedience to divine law, as the collection was "according to the commandment of Moses," highlighting the Chronicler's consistent focus on adherence to the Torah as the basis for national blessing and well-being (e.g., 2 Chronicles 15:2). Thirdly, the verse reinforces the theme of stewardship of God's house, portraying the Temple not just as a building but as a sacred trust that requires diligent care and financial support from both leadership and the populace. Finally, the reference to the "tabernacle of witness" connects the Temple's function to the foundational covenant relationship established in the wilderness, emphasizing the continuity of God's presence and covenant testimony among His people, a recurring motif throughout the historical books that points to God's enduring faithfulness.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Required (Hebrew, dârash', H1875): The verb דָּרַשׁ (H1875, dârash) means "to tread or frequent," and by implication, "to seek or ask" or "to require." In this context, it carries the force of a strong expectation or even a demand for accountability. It's not merely a suggestion but a royal directive that Joash expected Jehoiada to enforce. The king is actively seeking an explanation for the failure to fulfill a commanded duty, underscoring his authority and his commitment to the Temple's restoration. This word implies a diligent pursuit of what is due or necessary.
  • Collection (Hebrew, masʼêth', H4864): The noun מַשְׂאֵת (H4864, masʼêth) refers to a "lifting up," "tribute," "offering," or "contribution." While it can denote a voluntary gift, here, in conjunction with "according to the commandment of Moses," it specifically refers to a mandated, regular contribution for the upkeep of the sanctuary. This was not a one-time appeal but an ongoing obligation, likely the half-shekel temple tax (e.g., Exodus 30:13-16), which was a perpetual and required offering for the service of the Tabernacle and later the Temple. It signifies a burden or tribute that was to be brought in.
  • Tabernacle (Hebrew, ʼôhel', H168): The noun אֹהֶל (H168, ʼôhel) primarily means "a tent" or "covering," and by extension, a "dwelling place" or "tabernacle." Its use here, in the phrase "tabernacle of witness," is significant. While the Temple was a permanent stone structure, calling it a "tabernacle" emphasizes its spiritual continuity with the portable wilderness sanctuary. It highlights that the Temple, like the Tabernacle, was God's dwelling place among His people, a place of His manifest presence and covenant relationship. This choice of word reinforces the sacred and established nature of the structure and its purpose.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And the king called for Jehoiada the chief, and said unto him,": This opening clause establishes the direct and authoritative nature of the king's intervention. Joash, though young, is exercising his royal prerogative to address a critical issue concerning the national sanctuary. The "chief" (הָרֹאשׁ, ha-rosh) emphasizes Jehoiada's preeminent position as high priest and the primary figure responsible for the Temple's administration. The king's direct summons indicates the gravity of the matter and his expectation of immediate attention and accountability.
  • "Why hast thou not required of the Levites to bring in out of Judah and out of Jerusalem the collection,": This is a rhetorical question expressing the king's frustration and demanding an explanation for the delay. It highlights a failure in the chain of command: Jehoiada, as the chief priest, was responsible for overseeing the Levites, who were tasked with collecting the funds from the entire kingdom. The specification "out of Judah and out of Jerusalem" emphasizes the comprehensive nature of the required contribution, encompassing all the people within the kingdom's reach, indicating that the failure was widespread and not localized.
  • "[according to the commandment] of Moses the servant of the LORD, and of the congregation of Israel, for the tabernacle of witness?": This final clause provides the theological and legal justification for the collection, elevating it beyond a mere administrative task. The KJV's bracketed phrase "according to the commandment" accurately captures the sense that this was a divinely mandated obligation, rooted in the Mosaic Law (e.g., Exodus 30:11-16). The reference to "Moses the servant of the LORD" lends immense authority, invoking the foundational covenant. The "congregation of Israel" implies that this was a long-standing, communal responsibility, not a new or optional levy. The purpose "for the tabernacle of witness" underscores the sacred nature of the funds, intended for the upkeep of God's holy dwelling place, which served as a perpetual testimony to His covenant with His people.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several significant literary devices. The most prominent is the rhetorical question posed by King Joash ("Why hast thou not required...?"). This is not a question seeking information but expressing dismay, disappointment, and a demand for accountability. It serves to highlight the urgency of the situation and the king's firm resolve, placing the burden of explanation squarely on Jehoiada. There is also a strong element of direct address, as the king confronts Jehoiada personally, emphasizing the gravity of the oversight and the king's direct involvement in Temple affairs. Furthermore, the phrase "according to the commandment of Moses the servant of the LORD" functions as an appeal to authority, grounding the king's expectation in divine law and the revered figure of Moses, thereby lending immense weight to the demand for the collection. This also serves as emphasis on the sacred nature of the duty and the seriousness of its neglect, framing the delay not just as an administrative failure but as a breach of divine command.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

This verse powerfully connects to the broader biblical narrative by underscoring the enduring principles of divine expectation regarding the care of sacred spaces and the accountability of spiritual leadership. The collection for the "tabernacle of witness" (Temple) was not merely for structural maintenance but for the preservation of a physical symbol of God's covenant presence among His people. It reflects the truth that God's people are called to be diligent stewards of His resources and His work, whether that work involves physical structures or the spiritual health of the community. The king's righteous indignation at the delay highlights the seriousness of neglecting divinely mandated responsibilities, especially those pertaining to worship and the perpetuation of God's testimony. This passage reminds us that faithfulness in stewardship is a tangible expression of our commitment to God's purposes.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The confrontation between King Joash and Jehoiada serves as a potent reminder that spiritual diligence and accountability are paramount for all who serve God, regardless of their position or past faithfulness. Even the most revered leaders can fall short in executing their duties, and it is the responsibility of those in authority to ensure God's work is not hindered by negligence or procrastination. For believers today, this translates into a call for active and intentional participation in the support and mission of the Church, which is the contemporary "house of God" (1 Timothy 3:15) and the body of Christ. Our resources, time, and talents are to be stewarded diligently for the advancement of God's kingdom, ensuring that the "witness" of Christ is effectively proclaimed and His people are nourished. This verse challenges us to examine our own commitment to God's work, asking if we are fulfilling our commanded responsibilities with the urgency and faithfulness that God expects, recognizing that our contributions enable the ongoing testimony of God's presence and truth in the world.

Questions for Reflection

  • Where might I be procrastinating or neglecting a responsibility that God has entrusted to me, especially concerning His work or His people?
  • How does my stewardship of financial resources, time, and talents reflect my commitment to God's "house" (the Church) and its mission in the world?
  • In what ways can I hold myself and others accountable for spiritual duties, fostering diligence and faithfulness in my community of faith?
  • What does it mean for the Church today to be a "tabernacle of witness," and how can I personally contribute to its effective testimony and ongoing health?

FAQ

Was the collection for the Temple a voluntary offering or a mandatory tax?

Answer: The context of 2 Chronicles 24:6, particularly the phrase "according to the commandment of Moses the servant of the LORD," strongly indicates that this was a mandatory, commanded contribution rather than a voluntary offering. This likely refers to the half-shekel temple tax described in Exodus 30:11-16, which was a perpetual and required offering for the service of the Tabernacle (and later the Temple). It was a communal responsibility for atonement and the upkeep of the sanctuary, not an optional donation. The king's stern inquiry underscores its obligatory nature.

Why is the Temple referred to as the "tabernacle of witness" in this verse?

Answer: The term "tabernacle of witness" (or "tent of meeting" / "tent of testimony") was primarily used for the wilderness Tabernacle, which housed the Ark of the Covenant containing the "testimony" (the tablets of the Law). By applying this ancient designation to the Temple in Jerusalem, the Chronicler emphasizes the continuity of its function. The Temple, like the Tabernacle, was the central place where God's presence dwelt among His people, where His covenant was preserved, and where His laws served as a constant "witness" to His relationship with Israel. It highlighted that the Temple was not just a building, but a perpetual sign and reminder of God's covenant faithfulness and His dwelling among His people, serving as a physical embodiment of His enduring testimony.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The earthly Temple, whether called the "tabernacle of witness" or the "house of the LORD," ultimately pointed to a greater reality fulfilled in Jesus Christ. While the physical Temple required constant maintenance and offerings, Jesus declared Himself to be the true Temple, stating, "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up" (John 2:19). His body became the ultimate dwelling place of God among humanity, fulfilling the very essence of the "tabernacle of witness" – the presence of God testifying to His covenant with His people. The "collection" for the Temple's upkeep foreshadows the immeasurable cost of our redemption, paid not with silver or gold, but with the precious blood of Christ (1 Peter 1:18-19). Moreover, just as the Temple was a place of witness, Jesus commanded His followers to be His witnesses "to the ends of the earth" (Acts 1:8). The Church, as the body of Christ and the new spiritual Temple built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets with Christ Jesus himself as the chief cornerstone (Ephesians 2:19-22), is now called to be the living "tabernacle of witness," proclaiming the good news of the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29), and diligently stewarding the resources entrusted to us for the advancement of His eternal kingdom.

Copy as

Commentary on 2 Chronicles 24 verses 1–14

This account of Joash's good beginnings we had as it stands here Kg2 12:1, etc., though the latter part of this chapter, concerning his apostasy, we had little of there. What is good in men we should take all occasions to speak of and often repeat it; what is evil we should make mention of but sparingly, and no more than is needful. We shall here only observe, 1. That it is a happy thing for young people, when they are setting out in the world, to be under the direction of those that are wise and good and faithful to them, as Joash was under the influence of Jehoiada, during whose time he did that which was right. Let those that are young reckon it a blessing to them, and not a burden and check upon them, to have those with them that will caution them against that which is evil and advise and quicken them to that which is good; and let them reckon it not a mark of weakness and subjection, but of wisdom and discretion, to hearken to such. He that will not be counselled cannot be helped. It is especially prudent for young people to take advice in their marriages, as Joash did, who left it to his guardian to choose him his wives, because Jezebel and Athaliah had been such plagues, Ch2 24:3. This is a turn of life which often proves either the making or marring of young people, and therefore should be attended to with great care. 2. Men may go far in the external performances of religion, and keep long to them, merely by the power of their education and the influence of their friends, who yet have no hearty affection for divine things nor any inward relish of them. Foreign inducements may push men on to that which is good who are not actuated by a living principle of grace in their hearts. 3. In the outward expressions of devotion it is possible that those who have only the form of godliness may out-strip those who have the power of it. Joash is more solicitous and more zealous about the repair of the temple than Jehoiada himself, whom he reproves for his remissness in that matter, Ch2 24:6. It is easier to build temples than to be temples to God. 4. The repairing of churches is a good work, which all in their places should promote, for the decency and conveniency of religious assemblies. The learned tell us that in the Christian church, anciently, part of the tithes were applied that way. 5. Many a good work would be done that now lies undone if there were but a few active men to stir in it and to put it forward. When Joash found the money did not come in as he expected in one way he tried another way, and that answered the intention. Many have honesty enough to follow that have not zeal enough to lead in that which is good. The throwing of money into a chest, through a hole in the lid of it, was a way that had not been used before, and perhaps the very novelty of the thing made it a successful expedient for the raising of money; a great deal was thrown in and with a great deal of cheerfulness: they all rejoiced, Ch2 24:10. An invention to please people's humour may sometimes bring them to their duty. Wisdom herein is profitable to direct. 6. Faithfulness is the greatest praise and will be the greatest comfort of those that are entrusted with public treasure or employed in public business. The king and Jehoiada faithfully paid the money to the workmen, who faithfully did the work, Ch2 24:12, Ch2 24:13.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–14. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 2 Chronicles 24:6 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.