TRV
Translation
King James Version
And their father gave them great gifts of silver, and of gold, and of precious things, with fenced cities in Judah: but the kingdom gave he to Jehoram; because he was the firstborn.
Complete Jewish Bible
Their father had given them lavish gifts of silver, gold and other items of value, as well as fortified cities in Y'hudah; but he had given the kingdom to Y'horam, because he was the firstborn.
Berean Standard Bible
Their father had given them many gifts of silver and gold and precious things, as well as the fortified cities in Judah; but he gave the kingdom to Jehoram because he was the firstborn.
American Standard Version
And their father gave them great gifts, of silver, and of gold, and of precious things, with fortified cities in Judah: but the kingdom gave he to Jehoram, because he was the first-born.
World English Bible Messianic
Their father gave them great gifts, of silver, and of gold, and of precious things, with fortified cities in Judah: but the kingdom gave he to Jehoram, because he was the firstborn.
Geneva Bible (1599)
And their father gaue them great giftes of siluer and of golde, and of precious things, with strong cities in Iudah, but the kingdome gaue he to Iehoram: for he was the eldest.
Young's Literal Translation
and their father giveth to them many gifts of silver and of gold, and of precious things, with fenced cities in Judah, and the kingdom he hath given to Jehoram, for He is the first-born.
Study This Verse
Commentary on 2 Chronicles 21 verses 1–11
1 ¶ Now Jehoshaphat slept with his fathers, and was buried with his fathers in the city of David. And Jehoram his son reigned in his stead.
2 And he had brethren the sons of Jehoshaphat, Azariah, and Jehiel, and Zechariah, and Azariah, and Michael, and Shephatiah: all these were the sons of Jehoshaphat king of Israel.
3 And their father gave them great gifts of silver, and of gold, and of precious things, with fenced cities in Judah: but the kingdom gave he to Jehoram; because he was the firstborn.
4 Now when Jehoram was risen up to the kingdom of his father, he strengthened himself, and slew all his brethren with the sword, and divers also of the princes of Israel.
5 Jehoram was thirty and two years old when he began to reign, and he reigned eight years in Jerusalem.
6 And he walked in the way of the kings of Israel, like as did the house of Ahab: for he had the daughter of Ahab to wife: and he wrought that which was evil in the eyes of the LORD.
7 Howbeit the LORD would not destroy the house of David, because of the covenant that he had made with David, and as he promised to give a light to him and to his sons for ever.
8 In his days the Edomites revolted from under the dominion of Judah, and made themselves a king.
9 Then Jehoram went forth with his princes, and all his chariots with him: and he rose up by night, and smote the Edomites which compassed him in, and the captains of the chariots.
10 So the Edomites revolted from under the hand of Judah unto this day. The same time also did Libnah revolt from under his hand; because he had forsaken the LORD God of his fathers.
11 Moreover he made high places in the mountains of Judah, and caused the inhabitants of Jerusalem to commit fornication, and compelled Judah thereto.
We find here,
I. That Jehoshaphat was a very careful indulgent father to Jehoram. He had many sons, who are here named (Ch2 21:2), and it is said (Ch2 21:13) that they were better than Jehoram, had a great deal more wisdom and virtue, and lived up to their education, which he went counter to. They were very hopeful, and any of them more fit for the crown than he; and yet, because he was the first-born (Ch2 21:3), his father secured the kingdom to him, and portioned his brethren and disposed of them so as that they would be easy and give him no disturbance; as Abraham, when he made Isaac his heir, dismissed his other children with gifts. Herein Jehoshaphat was very kind and fair to his son, which might have obliged him to be respectful to him, and tread in the steps of so good a father. But it is no new thing for the children that have been most indulged by their parents to be least dutiful to them. Whether in doing this he acted wisely and well for his people, and was just to them, I cannot say. His birthright entitled him to a double portion of his father's estate, Deu 21:17. But if he appeared utterly unfit for government (the end of which is the good of the people), and likely to undo all that his father had done, it would have been better perhaps to have set him aside, and taken the next that was hopeful, and not inclined as he was to idolatry. Power is a sacred thing, with which men may either do much good or much hurt; and therefore Detur digniori - Let him that deserves it have it. Salus populi suprema lex - The security of the people is the first consideration.
II. That Jehoram was a most barbarous brother to his father's sons. As soon as he had settled himself in the throne he slew all his brethren with the sword, either by false accusation, under colour of law, or rather by assassination. By some wicked hand or other he got them all murdered, pretending (it is likely) that he could not think himself safe in the government till they were taken out of the way. Those that mean ill themselves are commonly, without cause, jealous of those about them. The wicked fear where no fear is, or pretend to do so, in order to conceal their malice. Jehoram, it is likely, hated his brethren and slew them for the same reason that Cain hated Abel and slew him, because their piety condemned his impiety and won them that esteem with the people which he had lost. With them he slew divers of the princes of Israel, who adhered to them, or were likely to avenge their death. The princes of Judah, those who had taught the good knowledge of the Lord (Ch2 17:7), are here called princes of Israel, as before fathers of Israel (Ch2 19:8), because they were Israelites indeed, men of integrity. The sword which the good father had put into their hands this wicked son sheathed in their bowels. Woe unto him that thus foundeth a kingdom in blood (Hab 2:12); it will prove a foundation that will sink the superstructure.
III. That Jehoram was a most wicked king, who corrupted and debauched his kingdom, and ruined the reformation that his good father and grandfather had carried on: He walked in the way of the house of Ahab (Ch2 21:6), made high places, which the people were of themselves too forward to make, and did his utmost to set up idolatry again, Ch2 21:11. 1. As for the inhabitants of Jerusalem, where he kept his court, he easily drew them into his spiritual whoredom: He caused them to commit fornication, seducing them to eat things sacrificed to idols, Rev 2:20. 2. The country people seem to have been brought to it with more difficulty; but those that would not be corrupted by flatteries were driven by force to partake in his abominable idolatries: He compelled Judah thereto. He used that power for the destruction of the church which was given him for the edification of it.
IV. That when he forsook God and his worship his subjects withdrew from their allegiance to him. 1. Some of the provinces abroad that were tributaries to him did so. The Edomites revolted (Ch2 21:8), and, though he chastised them (Ch2 21:9), yet he could not reduce them, Ch2 21:10. 2. One of the cities of his own kingdom did so. Libnah revolted (Ch2 21:10) and set up for a free state, as of old it had a king of its own, Jos 12:15. And the reason is here given, not only why God permitted it, but why they did it; they shook off his government because he had forsaken the Lord God of his fathers, had become an idolater and a worshipper of false gods, and they could not continue subject to him without some danger of being themselves also drawn away from God and their duty. While he adhered to God they adhered to him; but, when he cast God off, they cast him off. Whether this reason will justify them in their revolt of no, it will justify God's providence which ordered it so.
V. That yet God was tender of his covenant with the house of David, and therefore would not destroy the royal family, though it was so wretchedly corrupted and degenerated, Ch2 21:7. These things we had before, Kg2 8:19-22. The tenour of the covenant was that David's seed should be visited for their transgressions, but the covenant should never be broken, Psa 89:30, etc.
Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–11. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying 2 Chronicles 21:3 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
2 Chronicles 21:3 meticulously details King Jehoshaphat's final acts of provision for his sons before his death, a common practice in ancient Near Eastern monarchies. While bestowing substantial material wealth—including silver, gold, precious items, and strategically important fortified cities within Judah—upon his younger sons, Jehoshaphat explicitly designates the kingship itself to his eldest son, Jehoram, in strict adherence to the principle of primogeniture. This act highlights both a father's responsible provision for his family and the established order of royal succession within the Davidic dynasty.
CONTEXT
Literary Context: This verse is strategically placed at a pivotal transition point in 2 Chronicles, marking the end of the generally righteous and prosperous reign of King Jehoshaphat (chapters 17-20) and the ominous prelude to the tragically wicked rule of his son, Jehoram. The preceding verses 2 Chronicles 21:1-2 announce Jehoshaphat's death and list his seven sons, clearly identifying Jehoram as the eldest. Therefore, 2 Chronicles 21:3 serves as a crucial narrative bridge, illustrating Jehoshaphat's final, seemingly prudent acts of governance and family provision. This careful distribution of wealth stands in stark contrast to the bloodshed and apostasy that immediately follow, as Jehoram violently consolidates his power by murdering his brothers, a stark reversal vividly described in 2 Chronicles 21:4-6. The verse thus subtly introduces the tragic irony of human foresight in the face of spiritual rebellion and depravity.
Historical & Cultural Context: The practice of a reigning monarch distributing wealth, property, and even regional authority to his non-heir sons was a well-established custom in the ancient Near East. This strategy aimed to secure their loyalty, provide for their welfare, and, crucially, to prevent internal strife or challenges to the designated successor. Primogeniture, the right of the firstborn son to inherit the primary estate or title, was a deeply entrenched legal and social custom in Israelite society, explicitly affirmed and regulated within Mosaic Law, as seen in Deuteronomy 21:17. "Fenced cities" (or fortified cities) were not merely residential properties but significant strategic, economic, and administrative centers. Granting such cities implied a substantial transfer of resources and a degree of regional governance or significant landownership, positioning these sons as powerful figures within the kingdom's hierarchy, albeit subordinate to the king. This careful arrangement was designed to ensure stability and a clear line of succession, mitigating potential power struggles.
Key Themes: 2 Chronicles 21:3 contributes to several overarching themes prominent within 2 Chronicles and the broader biblical narrative. Primarily, it underscores the theme of Royal Succession and Primogeniture, illustrating the established custom by which the Davidic throne was passed down, emphasizing order and legitimacy. Secondly, it highlights Parental Provision and Stewardship, as Jehoshaphat demonstrates a responsible concern for all his children, not solely the heir, by distributing significant wealth and assets. This act reflects a king's duty to manage his resources and provide for his family, even as he adheres to the principle of a clear line of succession. Thirdly, and perhaps most poignantly, the verse subtly introduces the theme of The Limits of Human Wisdom and Planning. Despite Jehoshaphat's meticulous and seemingly wise arrangements, the subsequent narrative immediately reveals Jehoram's betrayal and murder of his brothers (2 Chronicles 21:4), demonstrating that even the most carefully laid human plans cannot guarantee righteous outcomes or prevent the destructive consequences of sin. This tragic outcome foreshadows the broader theological point that true security and blessing derive from obedience to God, not merely from material provision or human foresight, a central message explored throughout the book of 2 Chronicles.
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The verse employs several literary devices to convey its message effectively. Contrast is prominently featured in the distinction between the "great gifts" and "fenced cities" bestowed upon the younger sons and the singular "kingdom" reserved for the firstborn, Jehoram. This highlights the qualitative difference in inheritance and the unique status of the heir. There is also a subtle but powerful element of Foreshadowing, as the careful and generous provision by Jehoshaphat, a largely righteous king, stands in stark contrast to the subsequent violent and unrighteous actions of Jehoram, who would brutally murder these very brothers (2 Chronicles 21:4). This tragic irony underscores the futility of human planning when confronted with human depravity and spiritual rebellion. The Enumeration of "silver, and of gold, and of precious things" functions as a form of Merism, signifying the totality and abundance of the wealth transferred, indicating that no expense was spared in providing for the younger sons, attempting to secure their contentment and loyalty.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
2 Chronicles 21:3 speaks to profound theological themes concerning divine order in succession, the stewardship of wealth, and the inherent responsibility that accompanies inheritance. While the verse describes a human act of royal succession governed by the principle of primogeniture, it implicitly points to God's ultimate sovereignty over all earthly kingdoms and their rulers. The careful provision by Jehoshaphat, a king who largely walked in the ways of the Lord, reflects a righteous concern for his family's welfare and the stability of his realm, even if the outcome was tragically marred by his son's wickedness. This tension between human planning and divine will, and the moral choices of individuals, is a recurring theme woven throughout the Deuteronomistic history. The verse also touches on the broader biblical concept of inheritance, not merely as material wealth, but as a legacy of responsibility and a trust to be managed, which Jehoram would ultimately fail to uphold, leading to severe consequences for himself and the kingdom.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
This verse, though rooted in the ancient royal court of Judah, offers timeless insights into principles of family, provision, and the transfer of responsibility across generations. Jehoshaphat's actions exemplify a father's deep concern for the well-being of all his children, not just the designated heir. He models a form of responsible stewardship, distributing assets in a way that sought to provide for his sons and maintain stability within the kingdom. Yet, the subsequent narrative in 2 Chronicles 21 reveals the tragic reality that even the most meticulous human planning and generous material provision cannot guarantee righteous character or prevent the destructive choices of the next generation. This serves as a powerful reminder that while we are called to be good stewards of our resources and to wisely prepare for the future, our ultimate hope and the true inheritance we pass on must be spiritual. We must labor not just to provide material comfort, but to instill faith, character, and a love for God, recognizing that true security and blessing come from a relationship with the Lord, not from earthly possessions or positions. Our greatest legacy is not what we leave to our children, but what we leave in them.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why did King Jehoshaphat give so many gifts and cities to his younger sons if Jehoram was to be king?
Answer: Jehoshaphat's actions were likely a strategic and compassionate move to ensure stability and prevent future conflict within the royal family and the kingdom. In ancient monarchies, non-heir sons could become sources of discontent, potential rivals, or even lead revolts if they felt disinherited or unprovided for. By giving them "great gifts of silver, and of gold, and of precious things, with fenced cities," Jehoshaphat was providing them with significant wealth, status, and a secure base of power. This substantial provision ensured their welfare, gave them a vested interest in the kingdom's stability, and potentially established them as powerful regional governors or landowners, thereby removing any immediate incentive for them to challenge Jehoram's rule. It was an attempt to consolidate the family's power and minimize internal threats, even while strictly adhering to the principle of primogeniture for the throne itself.
What was the significance of "primogeniture" in ancient Israelite kingship?
Answer: Primogeniture, the right of the firstborn son to inherit the primary estate or title, was a foundational principle in ancient Israelite society, deeply rooted in both custom and Mosaic Law (Deuteronomy 21:17). In the context of kingship, it meant that the eldest son was the rightful heir to the throne, ensuring a clear and orderly succession. This practice minimized disputes over who would rule and provided a stable line of authority, which was crucial for the continuity and strength of the Davidic dynasty. Jehoshaphat's explicit statement that the kingdom was given to Jehoram "because he [was] the firstborn" underscores the adherence to this established and legitimizing principle, which was seen as divinely sanctioned and essential for the peace of the realm.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
While 2 Chronicles 21:3 describes an earthly king's distribution of a temporal inheritance, it subtly points forward to the ultimate, eternal inheritance found in Christ. Jesus is the true and eternal "firstborn" in a far grander sense, not merely by human lineage but as the "firstborn over all creation" (Colossians 1:15) and the "firstborn from among the dead" (Colossians 1:18). To Him, the Father has "appointed heir of all things" (Hebrews 1:2), granting Him a kingdom that is not of this world and will never end (John 18:36; Daniel 7:14). Unlike Jehoram, who squandered his earthly inheritance through wickedness and violence, murdering his own brothers, Christ, the perfect Son, faithfully received and perfectly stewards His divine inheritance. He offers eternal "gifts" to His followers—not silver or gold, but the spiritual riches of salvation, righteousness, and eternal life (Ephesians 1:3; Ephesians 4:7-8). The failure of earthly kings and their flawed successions ultimately highlights the need for the perfect, unblemished, and eternal reign of the King of kings, Jesus Christ, who alone can truly secure the ultimate inheritance for His people and ensure an everlasting kingdom of peace and righteousness (Revelation 11:15).