Deuteronomy 21:17

Translation
King James Version
But he shall acknowledge the son of the hated for the firstborn, by giving him a double portion of all that he hath: for he is the beginning of his strength; the right of the firstborn is his.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
But he shall acknowledge H5234 the son H1121 of the hated H8130 for the firstborn H1060, by giving H5414 him a double H8147 portion H6310 of all that he hath H4672: for he is the beginning H7225 of his strength H202; the right H4941 of the firstborn H1062 is his.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
No, he must acknowledge as firstborn the son of the unloved wife by giving him a double portion of everything he owns, for he is the firstfruits of his manhood, and the right of the firstborn is his.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Instead, he must acknowledge the firstborn, the son of his unloved wife, by giving him a double portion of all that he has. For that son is the firstfruits of his father’s strength; the right of the firstborn belongs to him.
Ask
American Standard Version
but he shall acknowledge the first-born, the son of the hated, by giving him a double portion of all that he hath; for he is the beginning of his strength; the right of the first-born is his.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
but he shall acknowledge the firstborn, the son of the hated, by giving him a double portion of all that he has; for he is the beginning of his strength. The right of the firstborn is his.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
But he shall acknowledge the sonne of the hated for the first borne, and giue him double portion of all that he hath: for hee is the first of his strength, and to him belongeth the right of the first borne.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
But the first-born, son of the hated one, he doth acknowledge, to give to him a double portion of all that is found with him, for he is the beginning of his strength; to him is the right of the first-born.
Ask
See also
Genesis 49:3Genesis 25:31Genesis 25:341 Chronicles 5:11 Chronicles 5:2Psalms 105:36Genesis 25:5
In the KJVVerse 5,465 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Deuteronomy 21:17 establishes a foundational legal principle within ancient Israelite society, safeguarding the inheritance rights of the firstborn son, particularly in polygamous households. This statute mandates that a father must formally acknowledge the firstborn son, regardless of his mother's favored status, by granting him the traditional double portion of the inheritance. It underscores God's unwavering commitment to justice, equity, and the sanctity of established societal and familial order, preventing personal bias or emotional preference from overriding divine law and the inherent rights of an individual.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Deuteronomy 21:17 is situated within the "Deuteronomic Code," a comprehensive collection of laws and instructions delivered by Moses to the Israelites on the plains of Moab, just before their entry into the Promised Land. This particular law falls within a section (Deuteronomy 21:10-23:14) dealing with various aspects of civil and domestic life, including regulations concerning war, marriage, family disputes, and judicial processes. Specifically, it is part of a series of laws addressing family matters, immediately following regulations concerning a captive woman taken as a wife (Deuteronomy 21:10-14) and preceding laws regarding a stubborn and rebellious son (Deuteronomy 21:18-21). This placement highlights the importance of maintaining order and justice within the family unit, which was the bedrock of Israelite society and a reflection of the nation's covenant relationship with God.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Ancient Israelite society was patriarchal and agrarian, with inheritance being crucial for economic stability and the continuation of the family line. The firstborn son held a uniquely privileged position, often inheriting the leadership of the family and a larger share of the family's assets. Polygamy, though not explicitly commanded, was a recognized practice, leading to complex family dynamics, especially when a man had wives of differing status or affection. The term "hated" (שָׂנוּא, sanu') in this context is a Hebrew idiom for "less loved" or "disfavored," rather than intense animosity, indicating a common social reality where a man might have a preferred wife. Without this law, a father could easily disinherit the firstborn son of a less-favored wife in favor of a son from a more beloved wife, leading to injustice, social instability, and the potential destitution of the disinherited son. This law directly addresses such potential for bias and abuse of paternal authority.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within Deuteronomy and the broader Old Testament. Foremost is the theme of Justice and Impartiality, demonstrating God's demand for fairness in human dealings, even within the intimate sphere of the family. It prevents personal bias from corrupting established legal principles, echoing the broader call for righteous judgment found in passages like Leviticus 19:15. Another key theme is the Sanctity of Birthright and Established Order. The law upholds the inherent right of the firstborn son, a concept deeply rooted in Israelite tradition (Genesis 25:31-34). His status is not contingent on his mother's standing but is a matter of divine decree and natural order, reflecting God's desire for stability and predictability in societal structures. Finally, the verse speaks to the Protection of the Vulnerable, safeguarding the rights of those who might otherwise be disadvantaged or marginalized within the family structure due to a father's personal preferences.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Acknowledge (Hebrew, nâkar', H5234): This verb means "to scrutinize," "to look intently at," and by extension, "to acknowledge," "to discern," or "to recognize." In this legal context, it signifies a formal, public act of recognition and declaration. It is not merely an internal thought or preference but an outward, legally binding affirmation of the son's status as firstborn, with all the accompanying rights and responsibilities. This active acknowledgment prevents a father from subtly or overtly denying the son's rightful position due to personal bias.
  • Firstborn (Hebrew, bᵉkôwr', H1060): This term refers to the "firstborn" or "eldest son," often implying a position of chief importance. In ancient Israelite society, the firstborn held a uniquely privileged status, inheriting a double portion of the family's assets and often assuming leadership of the family after the father's death. This word highlights the inherent, divinely recognized status of the son born first, regardless of the mother's standing or the father's affection.
  • Strength (Hebrew, ʼôwn', H202): This word denotes "ability," "power," "might," or "substance." In the phrase "beginning of his strength," it poetically refers to the father's procreative vigor and virility. The firstborn son is considered the initial fruit or first manifestation of this generative power, underscoring his unique and foundational position as the inaugural progeny and the first evidence of the father's ability to continue his lineage. This phrase elevates the firstborn's status beyond mere chronological order, imbuing it with a sense of natural and divine significance.

Verse Breakdown

  • "But he shall acknowledge the son of the hated [for] the firstborn,": This clause establishes the core command, directly addressing the father. Despite any personal preference or emotional bias ("hated" meaning less loved or disfavored), the father is legally and morally bound to formally recognize the son born first to any wife as the firstborn. This recognition is not optional but a divine mandate, overriding human partiality and preventing injustice.
  • "by giving him a double portion of all that he hath:": This specifies the practical consequence and legal obligation of acknowledging the firstborn. The father must allocate to this son an inheritance share twice as large as that of any other son. This "double portion" signifies the firstborn's unique status and responsibility within the family structure, ensuring his economic security and ability to lead the household and care for his family.
  • "for he [is] the beginning of his strength;": This provides the theological and natural justification for the law. The firstborn son is the initial fruit of the father's procreative power, the first manifestation of his virility and strength. This phrase elevates the firstborn's position from a mere birth order to a divinely ordained and naturally significant status, making his rights inherent and not subject to paternal whim.
  • "the right of the firstborn [is] his.": This concluding clause reiterates and emphatically affirms the firstborn's unalienable entitlement. It declares that the rights associated with being the firstborn are intrinsically his, not a privilege to be granted or withheld at the father's discretion. This final statement reinforces the divine authority behind the law and the inviolability of the firstborn's inheritance.

Literary Devices

Deuteronomy 21:17 employs several literary devices to convey its message with clarity and authority. The most prominent is Legal Language, characterized by its prescriptive and declarative tone ("he shall acknowledge," "by giving him"). This direct, imperative style leaves no room for ambiguity regarding the father's obligation. The phrase "beginning of his strength" serves as a powerful Metaphor or Figurative Language, personifying the father's virility and emphasizing the firstborn's foundational significance as its initial manifestation. This elevates the discussion beyond mere legal technicality to a deeper understanding of natural order and divine design. The verse also exhibits Emphasis through its structure, particularly in the concluding declaration, "the right of the firstborn [is] his." This final, definitive statement acts as a strong affirmation, underscoring the inviolable nature of the firstborn's entitlement and the divine backing of this law. There is also an element of Contrast implied between the father's potential "hatred" (disfavor) and the divine command for impartial justice, highlighting the tension between human inclination and God's righteous standard.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Deuteronomy 21:17 is a profound testament to God's character as a God of justice, order, and impartiality. It reveals a divine concern for the vulnerable and a commitment to upholding established rights, even when human emotions or personal biases might tempt one to deviate. This law transcends the specific context of polygamy to illustrate a universal principle: God's laws are designed to create a just society where rights are protected and favoritism is condemned. It underscores that true authority, even paternal authority, is always subject to a higher, divine standard of righteousness. The principle of the firstborn's inherent right, rooted in his unique position as the "beginning of his strength," reflects a divine order that values birthright and established roles, preventing chaos and ensuring stability within the family and, by extension, the community.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While the specific social context of polygamy and ancient inheritance laws may seem distant, the underlying principles of Deuteronomy 21:17 resonate deeply with timeless truths about justice, integrity, and compassion. This verse challenges us to examine our own hearts for biases and preferences that might lead us to treat others unfairly, whether in family, workplace, or community settings. It calls us to uphold what is right, even when it is personally inconvenient or emotionally challenging, reminding us that true righteousness requires us to act with impartiality and to protect the rights and dignity of all, especially those who might be less favored or vulnerable. We are invited to reflect on how we can embody God's character of justice in our relationships, ensuring that our decisions are guided by principle rather than prejudice, and that we actively work to affirm the inherent worth and rights of every individual.

Questions for Reflection

  • Where in my life might personal preferences or emotional biases be influencing my decisions in ways that are unfair to others?
  • How can I actively work to uphold justice and impartiality in my interactions, particularly with those who might be less favored or marginalized?
  • What does it mean to "acknowledge" the inherent worth and rights of others, even when I disagree with them or find them challenging?
  • In what ways can I protect the "double portion" (rights, dignity, opportunities) of those who are vulnerable in my community or sphere of influence?

FAQ

What does "hated" mean in this context, and does it imply genuine animosity?

Answer: In the context of Deuteronomy 21:17, the Hebrew word "hated" (שָׂנוּא, sanu') is a comparative idiom often translated as "less loved" or "disfavored," rather than implying intense animosity or active hatred. It describes a situation where a man has two wives, and he prefers one over the other. This linguistic nuance is crucial, as it highlights the human tendency towards favoritism and the divine law's intervention to prevent such personal biases from leading to injustice in matters of inheritance. It's similar to how Jacob "loved" Rachel more than Leah, leading to a situation where Leah was "hated" in comparison.

Why was the firstborn son's inheritance so significant in ancient Israel?

Answer: The firstborn son held a uniquely privileged and responsible position in ancient Israelite society. His inheritance of a "double portion" (twice the share of any other son) was not merely a financial advantage but symbolized his role as the primary heir and, often, the successor to the father's authority and leadership within the family. He was responsible for the family's welfare, the care of his mother and younger siblings, and the continuation of the family name and legacy. This special status was considered a "right of the firstborn" (Deuteronomy 21:17) and was deeply embedded in their cultural and legal framework, reflecting the importance of lineage and continuity.

Does this law about the firstborn's inheritance apply to Christians today?

Answer: While the specific legal injunctions regarding polygamy and the double portion for the firstborn are part of the Mosaic Law given to ancient Israel and do not directly apply to Christians as civil law, the underlying principles of Deuteronomy 21:17 remain profoundly relevant. Christians are called to uphold justice, impartiality, and fairness in all their dealings, resisting favoritism and protecting the vulnerable. The New Testament emphasizes that God shows no partiality (Romans 2:11), and believers are to emulate this divine characteristic. Therefore, while the literal application has ceased, the spiritual and ethical principles of righteous conduct, equitable treatment, and guarding against personal bias are eternally binding.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Deuteronomy 21:17, with its emphasis on the inherent right of the firstborn and the divine mandate for justice, finds its ultimate fulfillment and deepest meaning in the person and work of Jesus Christ. Jesus is uniquely presented in the New Testament as the "firstborn over all creation" (Colossians 1:15), signifying not merely chronological priority but His supreme preeminence, authority, and rightful inheritance over all things. He is the "heir of all things" (Hebrews 1:2), the one to whom the "double portion" of all creation's dominion rightfully belongs. Unlike the earthly father who might be tempted by partiality, God the Father perfectly "acknowledges" His Son, declaring Him His beloved and chosen one (Matthew 3:17). Furthermore, Christ, as the embodiment of divine justice, perfectly upholds the rights of all, especially the marginalized and "hated" of this world, offering them an inheritance in Him. Through His sacrifice, believers, who were once alienated and without hope, are adopted into God's family and become "co-heirs with Christ" (Romans 8:17), sharing in His glorious inheritance—a spiritual "double portion" far surpassing any earthly legacy. Thus, the ancient law foreshadows the perfect justice and ultimate inheritance secured by the true Firstborn, Jesus Christ.

Copy as

Commentary on Deuteronomy 21 verses 15–17

This law restrains men from disinheriting their eldest sons out of mere caprice, and without just provocation.

I. The case here put (Deu 21:15) is very instructive. 1. It shows the great mischief of having more wives than one, which the law of Moses did not restrain, probably in hopes that men's own experience of the great inconvenience of it in families would at last put an end to it and make them a law to themselves. Observe the supposition here: If a man have two wives, it is a thousand to one but one of them is beloved and the other hated (that is, manifestly loved less) as Leah was by Jacob, and the effect of this cannot but be strifes and jealousies, envy, confusion, and every evil work, which could not but create a constant uneasiness and vexation to the husband, and involve him both in sin and trouble. Those do much better consult their own ease and satisfaction who adhere to God's law than those who indulge their own lusts. 2. It shows how Providence commonly sides with the weakest, and gives more abundant honour to that part which lacked; for the first-born son is here supposed to be hers that was hated; it was so in Jacob's family: because the Lord saw that Leah was hated, Gen 29:31. The great householder wisely gives to each his dividend of comfort; if one had the honour to be the beloved wife, it often proved that the other had the honour to be the mother of the first-born.

II. The law in this case is still binding on parents; they must give their children their right without partiality. In the case supposed, the eldest son, though the son of the less-beloved wife, must have his birthright privilege, which was a double portion of the father's estate, because he was the beginning of his strength that is, in him his family began to be strengthened and his quiver began to be filled with the arrows of a mighty man (Psa 127:4), and therefore the right of the first-born is his, Deu 21:16, Deu 21:17. Jacob had indeed deprived Reuben of his birthright, and given it to Joseph, but it was because Reuben had forfeited the birthright by his incest, not because he was the son of the hated; now, lest that which Jacob did justly should be drawn into a precedent for others to do the same thing unjustly, it is here provided that when the father makes his will, or otherwise settled his estate, the child shall not fare the worse for the mother's unhappiness in having less of her husband's love, for that was not the child's fault. Note, (1.) Parents ought to make no other difference in dispensing their affections among their children than what they see plainly God makes in dispensing his grace among them. (2.) Since it is the providence of God that makes heirs, the disposal of providence in that matter must be acquiesced in and not opposed. No son should be abandoned by his father till he manifestly appear to be abandoned of God, which is hard to say of any while there is life.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 15–17. Public domain.
Copy as
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
Letters 31-40
This digression then of ours from one part of the Law to the other, for the purpose of shewing that the firstborn is not the son of the beloved, that is of the more remiss and voluptuous wife, has not been needless, although the words of the chapter before us express the same truth: He may not make the son of the beloved first-born before the son of the hated, which is indeed the first-born. He is indeed the first-born who is the holy son of a holy mother; true sons do not wander from their true mother, though sinners do wander; the true first-born therefore is he who is the son of the true mother: and he who is not truly the first-born, is strengthened by riches as if he were the first-born, and is honoured that he may not be in want: but he who is truly the first-born receives a double portion of all that he hath, that he may be rich.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Deuteronomy 21:17 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.