TRV
Translation
King James Version
But the people that followed Omri prevailed against the people that followed Tibni the son of Ginath: so Tibni died, and Omri reigned.
Complete Jewish Bible
But the faction supporting 'Omri won out over that of Tivni the son of Ginat; so Tivni died, and 'Omri became king.
Berean Standard Bible
But the followers of Omri proved stronger than those of Tibni son of Ginath. So Tibni died and Omri became king.
American Standard Version
But the people that followed Omri prevailed against the people that followed Tibni the son of Ginath: so Tibni died, and Omri reigned.
World English Bible Messianic
But the people who followed Omri prevailed against the people who followed Tibni the son of Ginath: so Tibni died, and Omri reigned.
Geneva Bible (1599)
But the people that folowed Omri, preuayled against the people that followed Tibni the sonne of Ginath: so Tibni dyed, and Omri reigned.
Young's Literal Translation
and stronger are the people that are after Omri than the people that are after Tibni son of Ginath, and Tibni dieth, and Omri reigneth.
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 9,306 of 31,102
Study This Verse
Commentary on 1 Kings 16 verses 15–28
15 ¶ In the twenty and seventh year of Asa king of Judah did Zimri reign seven days in Tirzah. And the people were encamped against Gibbethon, which belonged to the Philistines.
16 And the people that were encamped heard say, Zimri hath conspired, and hath also slain the king: wherefore all Israel made Omri, the captain of the host, king over Israel that day in the camp.
17 And Omri went up from Gibbethon, and all Israel with him, and they besieged Tirzah.
18 And it came to pass, when Zimri saw that the city was taken, that he went into the palace of the king's house, and burnt the king's house over him with fire, and died,
19 For his sins which he sinned in doing evil in the sight of the LORD, in walking in the way of Jeroboam, and in his sin which he did, to make Israel to sin.
20 Now the rest of the acts of Zimri, and his treason that he wrought, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel?
21 Then were the people of Israel divided into two parts: half of the people followed Tibni the son of Ginath, to make him king; and half followed Omri.
22 But the people that followed Omri prevailed against the people that followed Tibni the son of Ginath: so Tibni died, and Omri reigned.
23 In the thirty and first year of Asa king of Judah began Omri to reign over Israel, twelve years: six years reigned he in Tirzah.
24 And he bought the hill Samaria of Shemer for two talents of silver, and built on the hill, and called the name of the city which he built, after the name of Shemer, owner of the hill, Samaria.
25 But Omri wrought evil in the eyes of the LORD, and did worse than all that were before him.
26 For he walked in all the way of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, and in his sin wherewith he made Israel to sin, to provoke the LORD God of Israel to anger with their vanities.
27 Now the rest of the acts of Omri which he did, and his might that he shewed, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel?
28 So Omri slept with his fathers, and was buried in Samaria: and Ahab his son reigned in his stead.
Solomon observes (Pro 28:2) that for the transgression of a land many were the princes thereof (so it was here in Israel), but by a man of understanding the state thereof shall be prolonged - so it was with Judah at the same time under Asa. When men forsake God they are out of the way of rest and establishment. Zimri, and Tibni, and Omri, are here striving for the crown. Proud aspiring men ruin one another, and involve others in the ruin. These confusions end in the settlement of Omri; we must therefore take him along with us through this part of the story.
I. How he was chosen, as the Roman emperors often were, by the army in the field, now encamped before Gibbethon. Notice was soon brought thither that Zimri had slain their king (Kg1 16:16) and set up himself in Tirzah, the royal city, whereupon they chose Omri king in the camp, that they might without delay avenge the death of Elah upon Zimri. Though he was idle and intemperate, yet he was their king, and they would not tamely submit to his murderer, nor let the treason go unpunished. They did not attempt to avenge the death of Nadab upon Baasha, perhaps because the house of Baasha had ruled with more gentleness than the house of Jeroboam; but Zimri shall feel the resentments of the provoked army. The siege of Gibbethon is quitted (Philistines are sure to gain when Israelites quarrel) and Zimri is prosecuted.
II. How he conquered Zimri, who is said to have reigned seven days (Kg1 16:15), so long before Omri was proclaimed king and himself proclaimed traitor; but we may suppose it was a longer time before he died, for he continued long enough to show his inclination to the way of Jeroboam, and to make himself obnoxious to the justice of God by supporting his idolatry, Kg1 16:19. Tirzah was a beautiful city, but not fortified, so that Omri soon made himself master of it (Kg1 16:17), forced Zimri into the palace, which being unable to defend, and yet unwilling to surrender, he burnt, and himself in it, Kg1 16:18. Unwilling that his rival should ever enjoy that sumptuous palace, he burnt it; and fearing that if he fell into the hands of the army, either alive or dead, he should be ignominiously treated, he burnt himself in it. See what desperate practices men's wickedness sometimes brings them to, and how it hurries them into their own ruin; see the disposition of incendiaries, who set palaces and kingdoms on fire, though they are themselves in danger of perishing in the flame.
III. How he struggled with Tibni, and at length got clear of him: Half of the people followed this Tibni (Kg1 16:21), probably those who were in Zimri's interest, with whom others joined, who would not have a king chosen in the camp (lest he should rule by the sword and a standing army), but in a convention of the states. The contest between these two lasted some years, and, it is likely, cost a great deal of blood on both sides, for it was in the twenty-seventh year of Asa that Omri was first elected (Kg1 16:15) and thence the twelve years of his reign are to be dated; but it was not till the thirty-first year of Asa that he began to reign without a rival; then Tibni died, it is likely in battle, and Omri reigned, Kg1 16:22. Sir Walter Raleigh, in his History of the World (2.19.6), enquires here why it was that in all these confusions and revolutions of the kingdom of Israel they never thought of returning to the house of David, and uniting themselves again to Judah, for then it was better with them than now; and he thinks the reason was because the kings of Judah assumed a more absolute, arbitrary, and despotic power than the kings of Israel. It was the heaviness of the yoke that they complained of when they first revolted from the house of David, and the dread of that made them ever after averse to it, and attached to kings of their own, who ruled more by law and the rules of a limited monarchy.
IV. How he reigned when he was at length settled on the throne. 1. He made himself famous by building Samaria, which, ever after, was the royal city of the kings of Israel (the palace at Tirzah being burnt), and in process of time grew so considerable that it gave name to the middle part of Canaan (which lay between Galilee on the north and Judea on the south) and to the inhabitants of that country, who were called Samaritans. He bought the ground for two talents of silver, somewhat more than 700l. of our money, for a talent was 353l. 11s. 10 1/2d. Perhaps Shemer, who sold him the ground, let him have it considerably the cheaper upon condition that the city should be called after his name, for otherwise it would have borne the name of the purchaser; it was called Samaria, or Shemeren (as it is in the Hebrew), from Shemer, the former owner, Kg1 16:24. The kings of Israel changed their royal seats, Shechem first, then Tirzah, now Samaria; but the kings of Judah were constant to Jerusalem, the city of God. Those that cleave to the Lord fix, but those that leave him ever wander. 2. He made himself infamous by his wickedness; for he did worse than all that were before him, Kg1 16:25. Though he was brought to the throne with much difficulty, and Providence had remarkably favoured him in his advancement, yet he was more profane, or more superstitious, and a greater persecutor, than either of the houses of Jeroboam or Baasha. He went further than they had done in establishing iniquity by a law, and forcing his subjects to comply with him in it; for we read of the statutes of Omri, the keeping of which made Israel a desolation, Mic 6:16. Jeroboam caused Israel to sin by temptation, example, and allurement; but Omri did it by compulsion.
V. How he ended his reign, Kg1 16:27, Kg1 16:28. He was in some repute for the might which he showed. Many a bad man has been a stout man. He died in his bed, as did Jeroboam and Baasha themselves; but, like them, left it to his posterity to fill up the measure, and then pay off the scores, of his iniquity.
Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 15–28. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying 1 Kings 16:22 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
1 Kings 16:22 definitively concludes a protracted four-year civil war in the Northern Kingdom of Israel, solidifying Omri's ascendancy to the throne. This pivotal verse encapsulates the often brutal and pragmatic nature of royal succession in ancient Israel, particularly within the unstable Northern Kingdom, where military might and political acumen frequently determined leadership. Omri's decisive triumph over Tibni, the son of Ginath, not only ended a period of internal strife but also inaugurated a new and influential dynasty that would profoundly shape Israel's future, despite its deep spiritual failings and notorious idolatry.
CONTEXT
Literary Context: This verse serves as the climactic resolution to a chaotic period of regicide and civil unrest detailed in 1 Kings 16. The narrative immediately preceding it chronicles the assassination of King Elah by Zimri, one of his chariot commanders (1 Kings 16:9-10), followed by Zimri's remarkably brief seven-day reign, which ended in his self-immolation as Omri's forces besieged Tirzah (1 Kings 16:15-19). The ensuing power vacuum led to a divided kingdom, with "half of the people" supporting Tibni and the other half backing Omri, the commander of the army (1 Kings 16:21). Verse 22 resolves this internal conflict, establishing Omri as the undisputed king and setting the stage for his subsequent reign, including the strategic founding of Samaria as the new capital (1 Kings 16:23-24) and the continued, indeed intensified, spiritual decline of the nation under his and his son Ahab's influence (1 Kings 16:25-26).
Historical & Cultural Context: The period following the division of the united monarchy into the Northern Kingdom of Israel and the Southern Kingdom of Judah was characterized by profound political instability, frequent coups, and short-lived dynasties in the North. Unlike Judah, which maintained a relatively stable Davidic lineage, Israel experienced a rapid succession of kings, often through violent means, reflecting a lack of divine endorsement for their leadership. The four-year struggle between Omri and Tibni vividly illustrates the deep internal divisions and the absence of a clear, divinely sanctioned succession plan in the Northern Kingdom, a direct consequence of its initial rebellion against the house of David. This era was also marked by pervasive syncretism and idolatry, particularly the worship of the golden calves established by Jeroboam I (1 Kings 12:28-30), which contributed significantly to the moral decay and political fragmentation that plagued the nation. The military strength and political cunning required for Omri to "prevail" were typical means of securing power in the ancient Near East, where might often made right.
Key Themes: This verse powerfully illustrates several recurring themes within the book of Kings. Firstly, it underscores the persistent power struggle and succession dynamics in ancient Israel, where the throne, especially in the Northern Kingdom, was frequently seized by force rather than inherited peacefully. Secondly, it highlights the pervasive political instability that plagued Israel after its schism from Judah (1 Kings 12:19), a direct consequence of its spiritual rebellion and departure from God's covenant. Thirdly, while human ambition and conflict are undeniably evident, the narrative implicitly points to divine permissiveness and sovereignty over the rise and fall of leaders. Even ungodly rulers like Omri, who "did worse than all who were before him" (1 Kings 16:25), served, perhaps unwittingly, within God's overarching plan for judgment and discipline upon His people. The verse also sets the stage for the infamous Omride dynasty, a powerful but notoriously idolatrous line that would bring Israel to new depths of spiritual depravity, particularly under the reign of Ahab and Jezebel.
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The verse employs Conciseness to summarize a significant four-year conflict in a single, impactful sentence, highlighting only the essential outcome without dwelling on the details of the struggle. It uses Cause and Effect to clearly link Omri's military success ("prevailed") to Tibni's demise ("died") and Omri's subsequent rule ("reigned"), demonstrating a logical and inevitable progression of events. The use of Contrast is evident in the opposing factions ("people that followed Omri" vs. "people that followed Tibni"), emphasizing the deep division within Israel and the ultimate resolution of that conflict through force. Finally, the verse provides Narrative Closure for the civil war, bringing a period of intense instability to a definitive end and setting the stage for the next phase of Israel's history under Omri's reign.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
1 Kings 16:22, while describing a seemingly secular power struggle, is deeply imbued with theological significance within the broader biblical narrative. It illustrates the profound consequences of a nation's spiritual rebellion: when a people abandon God's covenant and His ways, they often experience political instability and leadership chosen by human might rather than divine appointment. Omri's violent ascent, though effective in bringing temporary stability, was not a divinely sanctioned reign in the way David's was for Judah. This highlights God's sovereignty, allowing human choices and their consequences to unfold, yet ultimately working within them to achieve His purposes, even through ungodly rulers. The verse serves as a stark reminder that true peace and stability for a nation are rooted not in military might or political prowess, but in faithfulness to God and adherence to His covenant.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
The account of Omri's rise to power, culminating in 1 Kings 16:22, offers profound and enduring lessons for contemporary believers. It reminds us that earthly power dynamics are often brutal, driven by human ambition, and characterized by conflict, yet God remains utterly sovereign over all. While we may naturally long for righteous leadership and stable societies, this passage cautions us against placing our ultimate hope in political outcomes or human rulers, however effective they may seem. Instead, our trust must be unequivocally in the Lord, who "changes times and seasons; he removes kings and sets up kings" (Daniel 2:21). The instability of Israel's Northern Kingdom serves as a powerful cautionary tale about the spiritual consequences of abandoning God's ways and pursuing self-centered paths. It underscores the paramount importance of seeking God's kingdom first (Matthew 6:33), understanding that true peace, justice, and lasting stability flow from His righteous reign, not from the fleeting victories of human factions or the ascendancy of powerful individuals. As believers, we are called to pray diligently for our leaders, to live righteously as salt and light in the world, and to be agents of God's transforming grace in a society often characterized by conflict, ambition, and a desperate search for power.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What was the significance of Omri's victory over Tibni?
Answer: Omri's victory over Tibni, as described in 1 Kings 16:22, was profoundly significant because it brought a definitive end to a four-year civil war that had fragmented the Northern Kingdom of Israel. This decisive triumph established Omri as the undisputed king, bringing a crucial measure of political stability after a period of intense turmoil following the assassination of King Elah and the brief, tumultuous reign of Zimri (1 Kings 16:9-20). His reign marked the beginning of the powerful Omride dynasty, which, despite its profound wickedness in God's eyes (1 Kings 16:25), brought significant political and economic influence to Israel, even establishing a new, strategically important capital city in Samaria (1 Kings 16:24).
How long did the conflict between Omri and Tibni last?
Answer: The conflict between Omri and Tibni lasted for approximately four years. This duration is inferred from the chronological details provided in 1 Kings 16. King Elah died in the twenty-sixth year of Asa king of Judah (1 Kings 16:10), and the division between Omri and Tibni began shortly thereafter (1 Kings 16:21). Omri then began his undisputed reign in the thirty-first year of Asa (1 Kings 16:23). This indicates a period of five years between Elah's death and Omri's undisputed reign, with four of those years being the duration of the intense civil war with Tibni.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The turbulent succession in 1 Kings 16:22, where Omri "prevailed" through military force and Tibni "died," stands in stark and illuminating contrast to the reign of Christ. The kings of Israel, like Omri, gained their thrones through human might, violence, and political maneuvering, often leading to cycles of instability, bloodshed, and spiritual decline. Their reigns were earthly, temporary, and inherently flawed, based on power exerted over others. In profound contrast, Jesus Christ's reign is established not by prevailing over rivals through force, but by prevailing over sin and death through ultimate self-sacrifice. His victory is secured not by taking life, but by giving His own life on the cross (Philippians 2:8). He is the true King, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, whose kingdom is "not of this world" (John 18:36). While Omri's reign brought a temporary, earthly stability to Israel through conquest, Christ's reign brings eternal peace, justice, and righteousness to all who believe in Him (Isaiah 9:6-7). His triumph over the powers of darkness and spiritual principalities (Colossians 2:15) ensures a kingdom that "will never be destroyed" (Daniel 2:44), offering a fulfillment far beyond the fleeting, often violent, and ultimately unholy reigns of human kings.