TRV
Translation
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 28,711 of 31,102
Study This Verse
Commentary on 1 Corinthians 14 verses 26–33
26 ¶ How is it then, brethren? when ye come together, every one of you hath a psalm, hath a doctrine, hath a tongue, hath a revelation, hath an interpretation. Let all things be done unto edifying.
27 If any man speak in an unknown tongue, let it be by two, or at the most by three, and that by course; and let one interpret.
28 But if there be no interpreter, let him keep silence in the church; and let him speak to himself, and to God.
29 Let the prophets speak two or three, and let the other judge.
30 If any thing be revealed to another that sitteth by, let the first hold his peace.
31 For ye may all prophesy one by one, that all may learn, and all may be comforted.
32 And the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets.
33 For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.
In this passage the apostle reproves them for their disorder, and endeavours to correct and regulate their conduct for the future.
I. He blames them for the confusion they introduced into the assembly, by ostentation of their gifts (Co1 14:26): When you come together every one hath a psalm, hath a doctrine, hath a tongue, etc.; that is, "You are apt to confound the several parts of worship; and, while one has a psalm to utter by inspiration, another has a doctrine, or revelation;" or else, "You are apt to be confused in the same branch of worship, many of you having psalms or doctrines to propose at the same time, without staying for one another. Is not this perfect uproar? Can this be edifying? And yet all religious exercises in public assemblies should have this view, Let all things be done to edifying."
II. He corrects their faults, and lays down some regulations for their future conduct. 1. As to speaking in an unknown tongue, he orders that no more than two or three should do it at one meeting, and this not altogether, but successively, one after another. And even this was not to be done unless there were some one to interpret (Co1 14:27, Co1 14:28), some other interpreter besides himself, who spoke; for to speak in an unknown tongue what he himself was afterwards to interpret could only be for ostentation. But, if another were present who could interpret, two miraculous gifts might be exercised at once, and thereby the church edified, and the faith of the hearers confirmed at the same time. But, if there were none to interpret, he was to be silent in the church, and only exercise his gift between God and himself (Co1 14:28), that is (as I think) in private, at home; for all who are present at public worship should join in it, and not be at their private devotions in public assemblies. Solitary devotions are out of time and place when the church has met for social worship. 2. As to prophesying he orders, (1.) That two or three only should speak at one meeting (Co1 14:20), and this successively, not all at once; and that the other should examine and judge what he delivered, that is, discern and determine concerning it, whether it were of divine inspiration or not. There might be false prophets, mere pretenders to divine inspiration; and the true prophets were to judge of these, and discern and discover who was divinely inspired, and by such inspiration interpreted scripture, and taught the church, and who was not - what was of divine inspiration and what was not. This seems to be the meaning of this rule. For where a prophet was known to be such, and under the divine afflatus, he could not be judged; for this were to subject even the Holy Spirit to the judgment of men. He who was indeed inspired, and known to be so, was above all human judgment. (2.) He orders that, if any assistant prophet had a revelation, while another was prophesying, the other should hold his peace, be silent (Co1 14:30), before the inspired assistant uttered his revelation. Indeed, it is by many understood that the former speaker should immediately hold his peace. But this seems unnatural, and not so well to agree with the context. For why must one that was speaking by inspiration be immediately silent upon another man's being inspired, and suppress what was dictated to him by the same Spirit? Indeed, he who had the new revelation might claim liberty of speech in his turn, upon producing his vouchers; but why must liberty of speech be taken from him who was speaking before, and his mouth stopped, when he was delivering the dictates of the same Spirit, and could produce the same vouchers? Would the Spirit of God move one to speak, and, before he had delivered what he had to say, move another to interrupt him, and put him to silence? This seems to me an unnatural thought. Nor is it more agreeable to the context, and the reason annexed (Co1 14:31): That all might prophesy, one by one, or one after another, which could not be where any one was interrupted and silenced before he had done prophesying; but might easily be if he who was afterwards inspired forbore to deliver his new revelation till the former prophet had finished what he had to say. And, to confirm this sense, the apostle quickly adds, The spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets (Co1 14:33); that is, the spiritual gifts they have leave them still possessed of their reason, and capable of using their own judgment in the exercise of them. Divine inspirations are not, like the diabolical possessions of heathen priests, violent and ungovernable, and prompting them to act as if they were beside themselves; but are sober and calm, and capable of regular conduct. The man inspired by the Spirit of God may still act the man, and observe the rules of natural order and decency in delivering his revelations. His spiritual gift is thus far subject to his pleasure, and to be managed by his discretion.
III. The apostle gives the reasons of these regulations. As, 1. That they would be for the church's benefit, their instruction and consolation. It is that all may learn, and all may be comforted or exhorted, that the prophets were to speak in the orderly manner the apostle advises. Note, The instruction, edification, and comfort of the church, is that for which God instituted the ministry. And surely ministers should, as much as possible, fit their ministrations to these purposes. 2. He tells them, God is not the God of confusion, but of peace and good order, Co1 14:33. Therefore divine inspiration should by no means throw Christian assemblies into confusion, and break through all rules of common decency, which yet would be unavoidable if several inspired men should all at once utter what was suggested to them by the Spirit of God, and not wait to take their turns. Note, The honour of God requires that things should be managed in Christian assemblies so as not to transgress the rules of natural decency. If they are managed in a tumultuous and confused manner, what a notion must this give of the God who is worshipped, to considerate observers! Does it look as if he were the God of peace and order, and an enemy to confusion? Things should be managed so in divine worship that no unlovely nor dishonourable notion of God should be formed in the minds of observers. 3. He adds that things were thus orderly managed in all the other churches: As in all the churches of the saints (Co1 14:33); they kept to these rules in the exercise of their spiritual gifts, which was a manifest proof that the church of Corinth might observe the same regulations. And it would be perfectly scandalous for them, who exceeded most churches in spiritual gifts, to be more disorderly than any in the exercise of them. Note, Though other churches are not to be our rule, yet the regard they pay to the rules of natural decency and order should restrain us from breaking these rules. Thus far they may be proposed as examples, and it is a shame not to follow them.
Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 26–33. Public domain.
Copy as
Shepherd of HermasAD 160
Shepherd of Hermas, Commandment 12
Walk in them, and exhort your hearers that their repentance may be pure during the remainder of their life. Fulfil carefully this ministry which I now entrust to you, and you will accomplish much.
TertullianAD 220
Against Marcion Book IV
To be sure, an amender of that Gospel, which had been all topsy-turvy from the days of Tiberius to those of Antoninus, first presented himself in Marcion alone-so long looked for by Christ, who was all along regretting that he had been in so great a hurry to send out his apostles without the support of Marcion! But for all that, heresy, which is for ever mending the Gospels, and corrupting them in the act, is an affair of man's audacity, not of God's authority; and if Marcion be even a disciple, he is yet not "above his master; " if Marcion be an apostle, still as Paul says, "Whether it be I or they, so we preach; " if Marcion be a prophet, even "the spirits of the prophets will be subject to the prophets," for they are not the authors of confusion, but of peace; or if Marcion be actually an angel, he must rather be designated "as anathema than as a preacher of the gospel," because it is a strange gospel which he has preached.
AmbrosiasterAD 384
COMMENTARY ON PAUL’S EPISTLES
The Spirit is said to be subject so that he may facilitate the good efforts which he prompts.
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on 1 Corinthians 36
"And the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets."
Seest thou how he put him to shame earnestly and fearfully? For that the man might not strive nor be factious, he signifies that the gift itself was under subjection. For by "spirit" here, he means its actual working. But if the spirit be subject, much more thou its possessor canst not justly be contentious.
OecumeniusAD 990
PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
If the gift is subject to the prophets, how can it not also be subject to you, so that you may keep quiet when you are meant to?
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying 1 Corinthians 14:32 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
1 Corinthians 14:32 is a pivotal statement within Paul's comprehensive instructions on the proper exercise of spiritual gifts, particularly prophecy, in the Corinthian church. This verse asserts the fundamental principle that divine inspiration, far from being an uncontrollable force, operates in conjunction with the prophet's self-control, ensuring order, decency, and edification in corporate worship. It directly counters any notion that spiritual manifestations lead to chaotic or involuntary behavior, emphasizing the prophet's personal responsibility to manage their gift in alignment with God's character of peace.
CONTEXT
Literary Context: 1 Corinthians 14:32 is situated within a larger discourse (chapters 1 Corinthians 12 through 1 Corinthians 14) where Paul addresses the enthusiastic, yet often disorderly, use of spiritual gifts in the Corinthian church. Following his profound teaching on love as the "more excellent way" in 1 Corinthians 13, Paul returns to practical guidelines for public worship. He has just encouraged the Corinthians to "desire spiritual gifts, but rather that ye may prophesy" (1 Corinthians 14:1), explaining that prophecy, unlike uninterpreted tongues, builds up the church (1 Corinthians 14:3). He then lays down specific regulations for prophets, instructing that only "two or at the most three" should speak "by course," with others judging (1 Corinthians 14:29). The preceding verse, 1 Corinthians 14:31, states, "For ye may all prophesy one by one, that all may learn, and all may be comforted," which directly sets the stage for the crucial principle of self-control articulated in verse 32. This verse serves as the theological underpinning for the practical regulations Paul has just given, affirming that such order is not only possible but divinely intended.
Historical & Cultural Context: The Corinthian church existed in a Greco-Roman city known for its diverse religious practices, including various forms of ecstatic worship where devotees were believed to be overcome by divine spirits, often resulting in uncontrollable utterances or behaviors. Paul's instructions in 1 Corinthians 14 directly counter these pagan notions of divine inspiration. The Corinthians, having recently converted from such backgrounds, may have mistakenly assumed that Christian spiritual gifts, particularly prophecy and tongues, operated similarly, leading to the chaotic scenes Paul addresses. Furthermore, the early church was establishing its identity distinct from both pagan cults and Jewish synagogue practices. Paul's emphasis on order, intelligibility, and edification was crucial for the credibility and growth of the nascent Christian community, ensuring that their gatherings were not perceived as frenzied or disorderly by outsiders (1 Corinthians 14:23). The cultural expectation of public speaking in the ancient world also favored clarity and rhetorical control, making the Corinthian chaos particularly problematic.
Key Themes: 1 Corinthians 14:32 powerfully reinforces several key themes throughout Paul's letter. Firstly, it underscores the overarching concern for Order in Worship, a theme that culminates in 1 Corinthians 14:40, "Let all things be done decently and in order." This verse directly refutes any idea that divine inspiration necessitates or excuses chaos. Secondly, it highlights the principle of Self-Control in Spiritual Gifts, emphasizing that the Holy Spirit empowers believers without overriding their will or creating an uncontrollable trance-like state, a stark contrast to many pagan prophetic practices. The prophet retains agency and responsibility. Thirdly, it speaks to the Responsibility of the Prophet, asserting that those gifted with prophecy are not merely passive conduits but active participants accountable for exercising their gift in a manner that aligns with God's character and edifies the community. Finally, this verse serves as a direct prelude to and theological basis for the declaration in 1 Corinthians 14:33, "For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints," thereby connecting the proper exercise of gifts to the very Character of God.
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
Paul's instruction in 1 Corinthians 14:32 primarily employs Didacticism, as it is a direct, authoritative teaching aimed at correcting disorder and establishing proper conduct within the Corinthian church. The statement itself functions as a Principle or Axiom, laying down a fundamental truth about the nature of spiritual gifts that undergirds all his practical regulations. There is also an element of Contrast implied: Paul is implicitly contrasting Christian prophecy, which is orderly and self-controlled, with the chaotic, uncontrollable ecstatic utterances found in pagan cults, which the Corinthians might have mistakenly emulated. The concise, declarative nature of the verse lends it an Authoritative Tone, reinforcing Paul's apostolic mandate to guide the nascent Christian community.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
1 Corinthians 14:32 is a cornerstone for understanding the nature of divine inspiration and human responsibility in the exercise of spiritual gifts. It establishes that God, who is a God of order and peace, works through human agents in a way that respects their will and faculties, rather than overriding them. This principle is crucial for maintaining the integrity and edification of the church assembly, ensuring that spiritual manifestations contribute to clarity and understanding, not confusion. It underscores the theological truth that genuine spirituality is never chaotic but always aligns with the character of God.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
The timeless truth embedded in 1 Corinthians 14:32 serves as a vital reminder for believers and churches today regarding the responsible stewardship of all spiritual gifts and ministries. It challenges any notion that profound spiritual experiences must be accompanied by a loss of control or an abandonment of decorum. Instead, it affirms that the Holy Spirit empowers us with a "sound mind" (2 Timothy 1:7) and enables us to exercise our gifts with discipline, love, and a focus on building up the body of Christ. Whether in public worship, small group ministry, or personal spiritual disciplines, the principle of self-control ensures that our actions reflect the peaceful and orderly nature of God. This verse calls us to intentionality in our spiritual expressions, ensuring they contribute to clarity, understanding, and edification for all, rather than confusion or distraction.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Does "spirits" in this verse refer to the Holy Spirit?
Answer: No, "spirits" (Greek: pneumata, plural) in 1 Corinthians 14:32 does not refer to the Holy Spirit (which is singular and divine). Rather, it refers to the prophetic utterances, the spiritual inspirations, or the manifestations of the gift of prophecy given to the prophets. Paul's point is that the expression of these divine impulses is under the prophet's control, not that the Holy Spirit itself is subject to human will. The Holy Spirit empowers, but does not compel a person to act chaotically or against their will.
Does this verse mean that all prophetic words must be judged or evaluated?
Answer: Yes, absolutely. 1 Corinthians 14:32 provides the theological basis for the instruction given in 1 Corinthians 14:29, which states, "Let the prophets speak two or at the most three, and let the others judge." Because the prophet retains control over their message, it implies that they are also responsible for the content and delivery, and thus their words can and should be evaluated by other mature believers. This ensures accuracy, alignment with Scripture, and edification for the church, preventing false prophecy or unhelpful messages from disrupting the assembly.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
While 1 Corinthians 14:32 directly addresses the orderly exercise of spiritual gifts in the early church, its underlying principle of divine power operating through human agency with self-control finds its ultimate fulfillment and perfect embodiment in the person of Jesus Christ. Jesus, though fully God, consistently exercised divine power with perfect self-control and submission to the Father's will. His miracles were never chaotic or for self-aggrandizement, but always purposeful, orderly, and aimed at revealing God's glory and bringing healing and deliverance (Mark 1:40-42). Even in His most profound spiritual agony in Gethsemane, He submitted His human will to the divine, praying, "Nevertheless not my will, but thine, be done" (Luke 22:42). His entire life, culminating in His willing sacrifice on the cross (Philippians 2:8), demonstrates the perfect union of divine power and human self-mastery, providing the supreme example for all believers in exercising their God-given gifts in an orderly, purposeful, and self-controlled manner, for the glory of God and the edification of His body.