1 Corinthians 14:29
“Rules for Orderly Public Worship”1 Corinthians 14:26–33
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- προφῆταιprophētaiProphetsG4396N-NPMNoun Nominative Plural Masculine
- δὲdethenG1161CONJConjunction
- δύοduotwoG1417A-NUIAdjective
- ἢēorG2228CONJConjunction
- τρεῖςtreisthreeG5140A-NPMAdjective Nominative Plural Masculine
- λαλείτωσανlaleitōsanshould speakG2980V-PAM-3PVerb Present Active Imperative 3rd Plural
- καὶkaiandG2532CONJConjunction
- οἱhoitheG3588T-NPMDefinite article Nominative Plural Masculine
- ἄλλοιalloiothersG243A-NPMAdjective Nominative Plural Masculine
- διακρινέτωσαν·diakrinetōsanshould discernG1252V-PAM-3PVerb Present Active Imperative 3rd Plural
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
See on the biblical-era maps


Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers 1 Corinthians 14:26–33. He set out his notes in a three-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
In this passage the apostle reproves them for their disorder, and endeavours to correct and regulate their conduct for the future.
I.He blames them for the confusion they introduced into the assembly, by ostentation of their gifts (1 Corinthians 14:26):
When you come together every one hath a psalm, hath a doctrine, hath a tongue, etc.; that is, "You are apt to confound the several parts of worship; and, while one has a psalm to utter by inspiration, another has a doctrine, or revelation;" or else, "You are apt to be confused in the same branch of worship, many of you having psalms or doctrines to propose at the same time, without staying for one another. Is not this perfect uproar? Can this be edifying? And yet all religious exercises in public assemblies should have this view, Let all things be done to edifying."
II.He corrects their faults, and lays down some regulations for their future conduct.
1.As to speaking in an unknown tongue, he orders that no more than two or three should do it at one meeting, and this not altogether, but successively, one after another. And even this was not to be done unless there were some one to interpret (1 Corinthians 14:27, 1 Corinthians 14:28), some other interpreter besides himself, who spoke; for to speak in an unknown tongue what he himself was afterwards to interpret could only be for ostentation. But, if another were present who could interpret, two miraculous gifts might be exercised at once, and thereby the church edified, and the faith of the hearers confirmed at the same time. But, if there were none to interpret, he was to be silent in the church, and only exercise his gift between God and himself (1 Corinthians 14:28), that is (as I think) in private, at home; for all who are present at public worship should join in it, and not be at their private devotions in public assemblies. Solitary devotions are out of time and place when the church has met for social worship.
2.As to prophesying he orders,
(1.)That two or three only should speak at one meeting (1 Corinthians 14:20), and this successively, not all at once; and that the other should examine and judge what he delivered, that is, discern and determine concerning it, whether it were of divine inspiration or not. There might be false prophets, mere pretenders to divine inspiration; and the true prophets were to judge of these, and discern and discover who was divinely inspired, and by such inspiration interpreted scripture, and taught the church, and who was not - what was of divine inspiration and what was not. This seems to be the meaning of this rule. For where a prophet was known to be such, and under the divine afflatus, he could not be judged; for this were to subject even the Holy Spirit to the judgment of men. He who was indeed inspired, and known to be so, was above all human judgment.
(2.)He orders that, if any assistant prophet had a revelation, while another was prophesying, the other should hold his peace, be silent (1 Corinthians 14:30), before the inspired assistant uttered his revelation. Indeed, it is by many understood that the former speaker should immediately hold his peace. But this seems unnatural, and not so well to agree with the context. For why must one that was speaking by inspiration be immediately silent upon another man's being inspired, and suppress what was dictated to him by the same Spirit? Indeed, he who had the new revelation might claim liberty of speech in his turn, upon producing his vouchers; but why must liberty of speech be taken from him who was speaking before, and his mouth stopped, when he was delivering the dictates of the same Spirit, and could produce the same vouchers? Would the Spirit of God move one to speak, and, before he had delivered what he had to say, move another to interrupt him, and put him to silence? This seems to me an unnatural thought. Nor is it more agreeable to the context, and the reason annexed (1 Corinthians 14:31): That all might prophesy, one by one, or one after another, which could not be where any one was interrupted and silenced before he had done prophesying; but might easily be if he who was afterwards inspired forbore to deliver his new revelation till the former prophet had finished what he had to say. And, to confirm this sense, the apostle quickly adds, The spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets (1 Corinthians 14:33); that is, the spiritual gifts they have leave them still possessed of their reason, and capable of using their own judgment in the exercise of them. Divine inspirations are not, like the diabolical possessions of heathen priests, violent and ungovernable, and prompting them to act as if they were beside themselves; but are sober and calm, and capable of regular conduct. The man inspired by the Spirit of God may still act the man, and observe the rules of natural order and decency in delivering his revelations. His spiritual gift is thus far subject to his pleasure, and to be managed by his discretion.
III.The apostle gives the reasons of these regulations. As,
1.That they would be for the church's benefit, their instruction and consolation. It is that all may learn, and all may be comforted or exhorted, that the prophets were to speak in the orderly manner the apostle advises. Note, The instruction, edification, and comfort of the church, is that for which God instituted the ministry. And surely ministers should, as much as possible, fit their ministrations to these purposes.
2.He tells them, God is not the God of confusion, but of peace and good order, 1 Corinthians 14:33. Therefore divine inspiration should by no means throw Christian assemblies into confusion, and break through all rules of common decency, which yet would be unavoidable if several inspired men should all at once utter what was suggested to them by the Spirit of God, and not wait to take their turns. Note, The honour of God requires that things should be managed in Christian assemblies so as not to transgress the rules of natural decency. If they are managed in a tumultuous and confused manner, what a notion must this give of the God who is worshipped, to considerate observers! Does it look as if he were the God of peace and order, and an enemy to confusion? Things should be managed so in divine worship that no unlovely nor dishonourable notion of God should be formed in the minds of observers.
3.He adds that things were thus orderly managed in all the other churches: As in all the churches of the saints (1 Corinthians 14:33); they kept to these rules in the exercise of their spiritual gifts, which was a manifest proof that the church of Corinth might observe the same regulations. And it would be perfectly scandalous for them, who exceeded most churches in spiritual gifts, to be more disorderly than any in the exercise of them. Note, Though other churches are not to be our rule, yet the regard they pay to the rules of natural decency and order should restrain us from breaking these rules. Thus far they may be proposed as examples, and it is a shame not to follow them.
Historical interpretation
Three Centuries of Reception
5 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
But permit the prophets to make Thanksgiving as much as they desire.
Neither must we prescribe this from custom, but overcome opposite custom by reason. For neither did Peter, whom first the Lord chose, and upon whom He built His Church, when Paul disputed with him afterwards about circumcision, claim anything to himself insolently, nor arrogantly assume anything; so as to say that he held the primacy, and that he ought rather to be obeyed by novices and those lately come. Nor did he despise Paul because he had previously been a persecutor of the Church, but admitted the counsel of truth, and easily yielded to the lawful reason which Paul asserted, furnishing thus an illustration to us both of concord and of patience, that we should not obstinately love our own opinions, but should rather adopt as our own those which at any time are usefully and wholesomely suggested by our brethren and colleagues, if they be true and lawful. Paul, moreover, looking forward to this, and consulting faithfully for concord and peace, has laid down in his epistle this rule: "Moreover, let the prophets speak two or three, and let the rest judge. But if anything be revealed to another that sitteth by, let the first hold his peace." In which place he has taught and shown that many things are revealed to individuals for the better, and that each one ought not obstinately to contend for that which he had once imbibed and held; but if anything has appeared better and more useful, he should gladly embrace it. For we are not overcome when better things are presented to us, but we are instructed, especially in those matters which pertain to the unity of the Church and the truth of our hope and faith; so that we, priests of God and prelates of His Church, by His condescension, should know that remission of sins cannot be given save in the Church, nor can the adversaries of Christ claim to themselves anything belonging to His grace.
"Seven thunders uttered their voices." The seven thunders uttering their voices signify, the Holy Spirit of sevenfold power, who through the prophets announced all things to come, and by His voice John gave his testimony in the world; but because he says that he was about to write the things which the thunders had uttered, that is, whatever things had been obscure in the announcements of the Old Testament; he is forbidden to write them, but he was charged to leave them sealed, because he is an apostle, nor was it fitting that the grace of the subsequent stage should be given in the first. "The time," says he, "is at hand." For the apostles, by powers, by signs, by portents, and by mighty works, have overcome unbelief. After them there is now given to the same completed Churches the comfort of having the prophetic Scriptures subsequently interpreted, for I said that after the apostles there would be interpreting prophets.
For the apostle says: "And he placed in the Church indeed, first, apostles; secondly, prophets; thirdly, teachers," and the rest. And in another place he says: "Let the prophets speak two or three, and let the others judge." And he says: "Every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered, dishonoureth her head" And when he says, "Let the prophets speak two or three, and let the others judge," he is not speaking in respect of the Catholic prophecy of things unheard and unknown, but of things both announced and known. But let them judge whether or not the interpretation is consistent with the testimonies of the prophetic utterance. It is plain, therefore, that to John, armed as he was with superior virtue, this was not necessary, although the body of Christ, which is the Church, adorned with His members, ought to respond to its position.
Paul allowed others to ask questions about ambiguous matters, so that they might be elucidated by clearer discussion.
"Let the prophets speak by two or three, and let the others discern."
No where hath he added, "at the most," as in the case of the tongues. And how is this, one saith? For he makes out that neither is prophesy sufficient in itself, if at least he permitteth the judgment to others. Nay, surely it is quite sufficient; and this is why he did not stop the mouth of the prophet, as of the other, when there is no interpreter; nor, as in his case he said, "if there be no interpreter let him keep silence," so also in the case of the prophet, "if there be none to discern, let him not prophesy;" but he only secured the hearer; since for the satisfaction of the hearers he said this, that no diviner might throw himself in among them. For of this also at the beginning he bade them beware, when he introduced a distinction between divination and prophecy, and now he bids them discriminate and spy out the matter, so that no Satanic teacher might privily enter.
Continue studying 1 Corinthians 14:29 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
Two or three prophets may speak in a meeting, and the others weigh what they say to discern whether it is truly from God.
“Let the prophets speak two or three,”
The prophets (prophḗtēs) speak (laléō) in a small number, in turn, so that each message can be taken in.
“and let the other judge.”
The rest weigh the message (diakrínō, to discern and evaluate). Hearing prophecy is an active duty of the church.
Passage study1 Corinthians 14:26–33
Orderly Worship from the God of Peace
Summary
Paul has spent three chapters on spiritual gifts, and here he turns them into working rules for the meetings of the church. Everyone may bring something. Tongues and prophecy each have their turn and their limit, and what is said is to be understood and weighed. One rule governs all of it, “Let all things be done unto edifying”, and one reason stands behind it: “God is not the author of confusion, but of peace.”
Why Corinth needed these rules
Corinth was a busy port and trading city, with people of many nations, much wealth and loose morals, and its young church carried some of that into its meetings. Pagan worship in the city included ecstatic rites in which a worshipper was thought to be overcome by a spirit and to speak beyond his own control, and public assemblies among Greeks and Romans were often loud places of display. Believers who had lately come out of that world were using their gifts, tongues above all, several at once and with nobody to explain what was said, and some may have treated the more spectacular gifts as a mark of standing. The same church was troubled by factions, lawsuits and abuse of the Lord’s Supper, so the disorder in worship was one part of a wider immaturity.
Paul has been answering this throughout 1 Corinthians 12–14. In 1 Corinthians 12 he teaches that one Spirit gives many gifts, and that each is given “to profit withal” (1 Corinthians 12:7). In 1 Corinthians 13 he sets love above every gift, the love that “seeketh not her own” (1 Corinthians 13:5). In 1 Corinthians 14:1–25 he compares tongues with prophecy and keeps in view the unbeliever who may walk into the meeting and needs to understand what he hears (1 Corinthians 14:23–25). With verse 26 he moves from principle to practice, and the rules that follow carry on to the end of 1 Corinthians 14.
What each believer brings, and the one rule for all of it
“How is it then, brethren?” is the question of a pastor who is correcting people he loves. It asks the Corinthians to look at their own meetings and to see that something is wrong with the way they gather. Paul then describes those meetings: “every one of you hath a psalm, hath a doctrine, hath a tongue, hath a revelation, hath an interpretation.” The word for “every one”, hékastos, means each one of the whole number, and the verb échō means to have or hold. “Hath” stands five times in verse 26, once for each thing brought, and the repetition lets us hear a room in which each person is holding something and wants to give it.
The five things are these:
Paul treats all five as real gifts, and the list stands for everything a believer might bring to worship. The meetings in Corinth were full of people who took part, and Paul leaves that in place. What he adds is a purpose: “Let all things be done unto edifying.” The whole rule is seven words in English. The verb gínomai, “be done”, means to come about or come into being, and here it stands as a command, so that building up is something the worshippers are to bring about on purpose.
“Edifying” is oikodomḗ, a word made from the words for “house” and “to build”, and it means a building or the act of building. The church is a house under construction, with Jesus Christ as its chief corner stone (Ephesians 2:20–22), and every song, teaching and message in the meeting is meant to add to that building. Paul has already said that the one who prophesies edifies the church (1 Corinthians 14:4) and has urged the Corinthians to seek to excel in building it up (1 Corinthians 14:12). Elsewhere he tells believers to pursue the things by which one may edify another (Romans 14:19), and he says that Christ gave gifts to his church for the building up of his body until we all come to maturity in him (Ephesians 4:11–13). Peter says the same of every gift: each of us is to use what he has received in serving the others, so that God is glorified (1 Peter 4:10–11). A gift is given for the good of the people around the one who has it.
The rule for tongues
“If any man speak in an unknown tongue, let it be by two, or at the most by three, and that by course; and let one interpret.” The word “unknown” was supplied by the KJV translators, and it gives the sense well. Glōssa means the tongue and so a language, and the verb laléō is the ordinary word for talking or uttering words. In this chapter the tongue is a language that the people listening do not understand. It may be a human language the speaker never learned, as on the day of Pentecost (Acts 2:4–11), or an utterance given by the Spirit that those present can follow only through the gift of interpretation. Either way the hearers are left outside the meaning until someone explains it.
Paul sets three conditions for its use in the meeting. Two people may speak in a tongue, or three at the most. They speak “by course”, aná méros, which means in turn, one after another. And one person interprets, whether the speaker himself or another with that gift. The verb is diermēneúō, to explain thoroughly or to translate.
Why must a tongue be interpreted?
Speech builds up the hearers only when they understand it. Paul has said earlier in the chapter that a person who speaks words nobody can follow is speaking into the air (1 Corinthians 14:9), that speaker and hearer become like a “barbarian” to each other (1 Corinthians 14:11), and that the person listening is left unable to say “Amen” to a prayer he could not follow (1 Corinthians 14:16). This is why he ranks prophecy above uninterpreted tongues (1 Corinthians 14:3–5) and prizes words that reach the understanding (1 Corinthians 14:19). Interpretation turns a closed utterance into a message the whole church can receive, learn from and agree with.
When nobody can interpret
“But if there be no interpreter, let him keep silence in the church; and let him speak to himself, and to God.” The verse opens with dé, “but”, which turns to the case where the condition of verse 27 is unmet. The interpreter is a diermēneutḗs, an explainer, and when the church has none the speaker is to keep silence. The verb sigáō means to keep silent, and it is a command. It asks for a deliberate holding back of the gift in public.
The place is named exactly: “in the church”, en followed by ekklēsía, which means an assembly or congregation. Paul is speaking of the gathered meeting. Outside that setting the speaker still has a use for his gift: he may speak “to himself”, heautoû, the plain reflexive pronoun, “and to God”, kaí with theós. The gift moves from the public meeting to private prayer, where it is between the believer and his God.
Does Paul forbid speaking in tongues?
Paul welcomes the gift and regulates its public use. In this same chapter he writes, “I would that ye all spake with tongues” (1 Corinthians 14:5), and near its end he says, “forbid not to speak with tongues” (1 Corinthians 14:39). His limits concern the meeting, where a tongue needs an interpreter, a turn and a small number of speakers. The silence of verse 28 is silence in the assembly, and private prayer in a tongue remains open to the believer.
The rule for prophecy
“Let the prophets speak two or three, and let the other judge.” A prophet, prophḗtēs, is a foreteller and more broadly an inspired speaker, a person who brings a message from God. In the New Testament church such a message might foretell what is coming or reveal something hidden, and Paul has said that its ordinary work is to build up, to exhort and to comfort (1 Corinthians 14:3). The verb for speaking is laléō, the same verb used of the tongue-speaker in verse 27, so prophecy in the meeting is spoken aloud for the whole church to hear. Two or three prophets may speak, one after another, which gives the congregation time to take in each message.
Then “let the other judge”. The verb is diakrínō, built from diá (“through” or “apart”) and krínō (“to judge”), and it means to separate thoroughly, to discern, to evaluate. “The other” may be the other prophets, mature believers, or those in the congregation with a gift of discernment. Their task is to distinguish what is truly from God, measuring the message against Scripture, the character of God and the witness of the Holy Spirit. The whole church therefore shares in guarding its own teaching. Paul tells the Thessalonians to honour prophecy and to test all things, holding on to what is good (1 Thessalonians 5:20–21). John tells believers to try the spirits (1 John 4:1), and the Bereans are remembered as noble in Acts 17:11.
Does “judge” mean to criticise the prophet?
To judge here is to weigh the message carefully, as a spiritual assessment of where it comes from and whether it is true. The aim is to protect the congregation from false teaching and from human error, so that what is received is sound and builds up. Personal fault-finding and condemnation of the speaker lie outside the meaning of the word.
Giving way to another
“If any thing be revealed to another that sitteth by, let the first hold his peace.” While one prophet is speaking, God may give a message to someone else in the room. “Revealed” is apokalýptō, to take off the cover and so to disclose, which tells us the message is given by God and uncovered to the person. “Sitteth by” is káthēmai, to sit, and it describes a person seated in the meeting and listening while another speaks. The Spirit is free to speak through anyone present.
When that happens, “the first”, the one already speaking, is to “hold his peace”. This is sigáō again, the verb of verse 28, and in Greek it is a single word of command. The silence lasts for the moment and has a purpose, which is to let the new word be heard. It asks humility of the speaker, who gives up the floor for the good of the church.
Can anyone interrupt a sermon with a revelation?
Paul is describing prophets who take turns in a meeting where several may speak, and his aim throughout is order and edification. In a church today the principle is kept when leaders are ready to change what they had planned as the Spirit leads, or when a set time is given for members to share a word. All of it stays under the rule that closes the chapter: “Let all things be done decently and in order” (1 Corinthians 14:40).
Is the revelation new doctrine?
The revelation of verse 30 is a timely word from God for the church then gathered, a word of encouragement, exhortation, comfort or guidance that applies his truth to their situation. Scripture is given by inspiration of God and is complete and sufficient (2 Timothy 3:16–17), so a message of this kind adds nothing to it and never contradicts it.
All may prophesy, one by one
“For ye may all prophesy one by one, that all may learn, and all may be comforted.” The verb prophēteúō means to speak under inspiration, and in this chapter it is the speaking of an understandable message from God to his people. “All” stands three times in verse 31, where the Greek word is pas. The gift is open to many in the church and is not kept to a few, and its benefit is meant for every person present. “One by one” is the condition that makes this possible, since each message can then be heard and weighed.
Paul names two purposes. The first is “that all may learn”: manthánō is to learn in any way, and prophecy teaches, deepening the church’s knowledge of God and his will. The second is that “all may be comforted”. Parakaléō comes from words meaning “near” and “to call”, and it covers exhorting, encouraging and consoling, as does its noun paraklesis. A word from God steadies tired believers and stirs them to keep going.
Believers differ on whether this gift continues in the church now. Many hold that it does, and on that view prophecy today is a Spirit-given word that builds up, exhorts and comforts, always open to testing by the congregation and its leaders, and distinct from the infallible revelation given through the biblical prophets. Prophecy is also distinct from teaching, which Paul lists as a gift of its own (Romans 12:6–8). Teaching explains and applies Scripture through careful study and grounds believers in sound doctrine, while prophecy is a more spontaneous word for a particular moment. Both must agree with Scripture, and the church needs both.
Why can a prophet wait his turn?
“And the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets.” A prophet can wait because the gift God gives him stays under his own control. Pneûma means breath or wind, and from there a spirit, whether human, angelic or divine. Here it is plural (pneumata), and it refers to the prophetic impulses or inspirations given to the prophets, the spiritual enablement through which they speak. The Holy Spirit himself is one, and Paul is saying nothing about him being placed under human will.
“Subject” is hypotássō, to subordinate or put under. “Prophets” comes twice in the verse, first as those who receive the impulse and then as those who govern it. A prophet who is truly inspired keeps the use of his mind and will. He can choose when to speak, wait for his turn, or stop for another, which is exactly what verses 29 to 31 ask of him.
This set Christian prophecy apart from the ecstatic worship the Corinthians had known, in which the worshipper was thought to be carried away by a power he could not resist. Believers fresh from that background may have assumed that the Spirit’s gifts worked the same way, and the verse corrects them. God’s Spirit works through people whose faculties he respects. Paul writes to Timothy, “For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind” (2 Timothy 1:7), and the fruit of the Spirit includes self-control (Galatians 5:22–23). The same Paul who urges the church to “desire spiritual gifts, but rather that ye may prophesy” (1 Corinthians 14:1) holds each prophet responsible for how he uses the gift. Because the prophet answers for what he says and how he says it, his words can be weighed by others, as verse 29 requires.
Do these rules limit the Holy Spirit?
The rules are the Spirit’s own guidance for the use of his gifts. He distributes them to each person as he wills (1 Corinthians 12:11), and he gives them so that the church is built up, which happens when they are used in turn and understood. Order and spiritual life belong together, and a church can be glad of both.
God is the author of peace
“For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.” With this sentence Paul gives the reason for every rule before it, and the reason is who God is. The words “the author” were supplied by the translators to make the sense plain in English: confusion does not come from God as its source.
“Confusion” is akatastasía, instability, disorder and tumult, a word strong enough to describe a commotion or an uprising. It names what a meeting becomes when several people speak at once and nobody can follow. Where such disorder is found in worship, it comes from human failing and misunderstanding. “Peace” is eirḗnē, from a verb meaning “to join”. It means tranquillity and harmony, and in Scripture it reaches further, to wholeness, well-being and right relationship. Where God is at work, people are joined together and things hold. He is “the God of peace” (Romans 15:33). His peace “passeth all understanding” and keeps our hearts and minds through Christ Jesus (Philippians 4:7), and Paul tells the church, “let the peace of God rule in your hearts, to the which also ye are called in one body” (Colossians 3:15).
“As in all churches of the saints” widens the rule from Corinth to every congregation. Ekklēsía is again the assembly, and the saints, hágios, are the people God has set apart as holy. What Paul asks of Corinth is what God expects of his people everywhere.
The principle reaches past tongues and prophecy. Since peace belongs to God’s nature, it is the standard for the whole life of a church, including its leadership, its decisions and the way its members treat one another. It leaves room for spontaneous and varied worship, since the verses just before it allow several people to take part in one meeting. What it asks is that all of it be orderly, clear and upbuilding.
Christ, the Word who speaks clearly and brings peace
Jesus is God’s clearest word to us. He is the Word made flesh (John 1:14) and the Son by whom God has spoken in these last days (Hebrews 1:1–2), and he has made the Father known (John 1:18). He taught the multitudes in parables (Matthew 13:34), the people were astonished at the authority of his teaching (Matthew 7:28–29), and he comforted the weary with the promise of rest (Matthew 11:28–30). In him we see the learning and the comfort that Paul wants prophecy to give. Every message that claims to come from God is therefore measured by the person, work and teaching of Jesus.
The gifts themselves come from him. Having been exalted, he poured out the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:33), and the Spirit guides his people into all truth and glorifies Christ (John 16:7–15). Christ is the head of the body, the church (Colossians 1:18, Ephesians 5:23), and the gifts serve to bring that body to “the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ”.
He is also the pattern of the humility these rules ask for. Being in the form of God, he “made himself of no reputation”, took the form of a servant and was obedient as far as the cross (Philippians 2:6–8). He held his peace before his accusers (Isaiah 53:7). In Gethsemane he yielded his will to the Father (Matthew 26:39), praying, “nevertheless not my will, but thine, be done” (Luke 22:42). His power was always under control and used for others, as when he healed the leper (Mark 1:40–42).
And the peace of verse 33 is his. He is the Prince of Peace (Isaiah 9:6). Through him we have peace with God (Romans 5:1), a peace made by the blood of his cross (Colossians 1:20), and he says to his disciples, “Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you” (John 14:27).
What a church gathering is for
These verses give us a simple test for anything done when believers meet, whether a song, a sermon, a prayer or a testimony: does it build up the people who are there? Paul assumes that every believer has something to give, so the passage honours each member’s part, and it asks each of us to offer that part for the good of the others. Clear words serve everyone in the room, including the visitor who is still finding out who Christ is.
The passage also shows us that listening is work given to the whole church. We weigh what we hear against Scripture, and we receive what is true with gladness. Those who speak can do so with humility, ready to wait or to give way, because the Spirit who gives a gift also gives the self-control to use it well.
Above all we are shown who God is. He is the author of peace, and a church that gathers in order, where people take turns, understand one another and are comforted, is showing the world something true about him. The same peace is his gift for our homes, our work and our dealings with each other, wherever his people carry it.
1 Corinthians 14:26
“How is it then, brethren?”
A question that corrects gently. Paul calls them brethren while he points out that their way of meeting needs to change.
“when ye come together, every one of you hath a psalm, hath a doctrine, hath a tongue, hath a revelation, hath an interpretation.”
Each member (hékastos) has (échō) something to offer: a song, a teaching (didachḗ), a tongue (glōssa), a revelation (apokálypsis) and an interpretation (hermēneía). The gifts are real and good, and they were being used all at once.
“Let all things be done unto edifying.”
The command (gínomai, “be done”) that governs the whole passage. Oikodomḗ is building, so every contribution is measured by whether it builds up the church.
1 Corinthians 14:27
“If any man speak in an unknown tongue,”
The case in view is a tongue (glōssa) spoken (laléō) aloud in the meeting. “Unknown” was added by the translators and fits, since the hearers do not understand the language.
“let it be by two, or at the most by three, and that by course;”
A limit on the number and a rule of turns. “By course” (aná méros) means one after another.
“and let one interpret.”
One person, the speaker or another, translates or explains (diermēneúō), so that the church receives a message it can understand.
1 Corinthians 14:28
“But if there be no interpreter,”
Dé, “but”, turns to the opposite case. With no explainer (diermēneutḗs) present, the question is whether the tongue can be understood, and the gift itself is left unquestioned.
“let him keep silence in the church;”
A command (sigáō) that applies “in the church” (en with ekklēsía), the gathered assembly.
“and let him speak to himself, and to God.”
The gift has a private use. “To himself” (heautoû) and “to God” (kaí with theós) describe prayer between the believer and his God.
1 Corinthians 14:29 This verse
“Let the prophets speak two or three,”
The prophets (prophḗtēs) speak (laléō) in a small number, in turn, so that each message can be taken in.
“and let the other judge.”
The rest weigh the message (diakrínō, to discern and evaluate). Hearing prophecy is an active duty of the church.
1 Corinthians 14:30
“If any thing be revealed to another that sitteth by,”
God may uncover (apokalýptō) a message to someone seated (káthēmai) among the listeners. His word in the meeting is not tied to the person who happens to be speaking.
“let the first hold his peace.”
The one already speaking stops (sigáō) and gives way. The new word from God takes first place.
1 Corinthians 14:31
“For ye may all prophesy one by one,”
Many may prophesy (prophēteúō), and the manner is fixed: one at a time. Paul regulates how the prophets speak while keeping the gift open to them all.
“that all may learn,”
The first purpose (manthánō). Prophecy instructs the whole congregation.
“and all may be comforted.”
The second purpose (parakaléō). Prophecy encourages, exhorts and consoles, the paraklesis of God’s people. The repeated “all” (pas) shows that the benefit is for everyone.
1 Corinthians 14:32
“And the spirits of the prophets”
The plural “spirits” (pneûma, here pneumata) are the prophetic impulses or inspirations the prophets receive.
“are subject to the prophets.”
These are under (hypotássō) the prophets’ control. Inspiration leaves a prophet able to speak, wait or be silent, and so responsible for what he does.
1 Corinthians 14:33
“For God is not the author of confusion,”
The reason for all the rules. Confusion (akatastasía), meaning disorder and tumult, has no source in God.
“but of peace,”
Peace (eirḗnē) is harmony, order and well-being, and it marks the places where God is at work.
“as in all churches of the saints.”
The standard is shared by every assembly (ekklēsía) of God’s holy people (hágios), and Corinth is asked to keep what all keep.
Last revised