1 Chronicles 9:40
And the son of Jonathan [was] Meribbaal: and Meribbaal begat Micah.
And the son {H1121} of Jonathan {H3083} was Meribbaal {H4807}: and Meribbaal {H4810} begat {H3205} Micah {H4318}.
The son of Y'honatan was M'riv-Ba'al, and M'riv-Ba'al fathered Mikhah.
The son of Jonathan: Merib-baal, who was the father of Micah.
And the son of Jonathan was Merib-baal; and Merib-baal begat Micah.
Cross-References
-
1 Chronicles 8:34
And the son of Jonathan [was] Meribbaal; and Meribbaal begat Micah. -
1 Chronicles 8:36
And Ahaz begat Jehoadah; and Jehoadah begat Alemeth, and Azmaveth, and Zimri; and Zimri begat Moza, -
2 Samuel 4:4
And Jonathan, Saul's son, had a son [that was] lame of [his] feet. He was five years old when the tidings came of Saul and Jonathan out of Jezreel, and his nurse took him up, and fled: and it came to pass, as she made haste to flee, that he fell, and became lame. And his name [was] Mephibosheth.
Commentary
Context of 1 Chronicles 9:40
1 Chronicles Chapter 9 is a detailed genealogical record, primarily focusing on those who returned from Babylonian exile and settled in Jerusalem and other cities. It meticulously lists the families of Israel and Judah, including priests, Levites, gatekeepers, and other temple servants. Within this larger genealogical framework, verses 35-44 provide a specific and extensive genealogy of King Saul's family, tracing his lineage through his son Jonathan. This section serves to connect the pre-exilic history and the royal line with the post-exilic community, reinforcing the continuity of God's covenant and Israel's identity.
Key Themes and Messages
Linguistic Insights
The name Meribbaal (ืึฐืจึดืื ืึทึผืขึทื, Meriyb Ba'al) is significant. It literally means "contender with Baal" or "Baal strives." In other parts of the Old Testament, particularly in 2 Samuel, this same individual is referred to as Mephibosheth (ืึฐืคึดืืึนืฉึถืืช, Mephibosheth). The change in name from "Baal" to "Bosheth" (meaning "shame" or "idolatry") is believed to be a deliberate alteration by later scribes or the Chronicler to avoid associating any Israelite figure with the pagan deity Baal, especially after the strong condemnations of Baal worship throughout Israel's history. This linguistic shift reflects a theological sensitivity, distancing the revered lineage from any perceived connection to idolatry.
Related Scriptures
Practical Application
While a seemingly minor genealogical note, this verse, when viewed in its broader biblical context, reminds us of several important principles:
Please note that only the commentary section is AI-generated โ the main Scripture and cross-references are stored on the site and are from trusted and verified sources.