Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And Obadiah the son of Shemaiah, the son of Galal, the son of Jeduthun, and Berechiah the son of Asa, the son of Elkanah, that dwelt in the villages of the Netophathites.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And Obadiah H5662 the son H1121 of Shemaiah H8098, the son H1121 of Galal H1559, the son H1121 of Jeduthun H3038, and Berechiah H1296 the son H1121 of Asa H609, the son H1121 of Elkanah H511, that dwelt H3427 in the villages H2691 of the Netophathites H5200.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
'Ovadyah the son of Sh'ma'yah the son of Galal the son of Y'dutun; and Berekhyah the son of Asa the son of Elkanah, who lived in the towns of the N'tofati.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Obadiah son of Shemaiah, the son of Galal, the son of Jeduthun; and Berechiah son of Asa, the son of Elkanah, who lived in the villages of the Netophathites.
Ask
American Standard Version
and Obadiah the son of Shemaiah, the son of Galal, the son of Jeduthun, and Berechiah the son of Asa, the son of Elkanah, that dwelt in the villages of the Netophathites.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
and Obadiah the son of Shemaiah, the son of Galal, the son of Jeduthun, and Berechiah the son of Asa, the son of Elkanah, who lived in the villages of the Netophathites.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And Obadiah the sonne of Shemaiah, the sonne of Galal, the sonne of Ieduthun, and Berechiah, the sonne of Asa, the sonne of Elkanah, that dwelt in the villages of the Netophathites.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and Obadiah son of Shemariah, son of Galal, son of Jeduthun, and Berechiah, son of Asa, son of Elkanah, who is dwelling in the villages of the Netophathite.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 9:16 meticulously records the lineages of two significant Levites, Obadiah and Berechiah, specifying their descent and their residence in the villages of the Netophathites. This verse is an integral part of a larger, detailed register of those who returned to Judah following the Babylonian exile, particularly focusing on individuals crucial for the re-establishment of Jerusalem and its surrounding areas. It underscores the meticulous efforts to restore Israel's national identity, community order, and the vital functions of temple service in the post-exilic period.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: 1 Chronicles 9 serves as a pivotal bridge within the Chronicler's narrative, transitioning from the expansive genealogies of Israel's tribes in chapters 1-8 to the historical account of the monarchy beginning in chapter 10. This chapter meticulously lists the families of priests, Levites, gatekeepers, and other temple servants who resettled Jerusalem and its environs after the Babylonian exile. The detailed enumeration, including the specific mention of Obadiah and Berechiah, functions to document the re-population of the land and the re-establishment of organized worship and civic life. It highlights the continuity of God's covenant people and their roles, setting the stage for the re-establishment of the Davidic covenant and proper worship in the land, which is the Chronicler's primary theological concern.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The setting for 1 Chronicles 9:16 is the post-exilic period, following Cyrus the Great's decree in 538 BCE, which permitted the Jewish exiles to return to their homeland (Ezra 1:1-4). The returning community faced immense challenges in rebuilding devastated cities, reconstructing the Temple, and re-establishing their national and religious identity. In this context, the meticulous record-keeping of lineages was not merely an administrative task but a profound theological and practical necessity. It was vital for validating claims to land, confirming tribal affiliations, and, critically, ensuring eligibility for sacred duties, as only those of specific ancestral lines could perform priestly or Levitical service (Nehemiah 7:61-65). The mention of "Netophathites" refers to inhabitants of Netophah, a town south of Jerusalem, often associated with Levitical settlements or temple singers (Nehemiah 7:26), further emphasizing the comprehensive re-establishment of organized religious life and community structure.
  • Key Themes:
    • Re-establishment and Restoration: This verse, along with the broader chapter, powerfully illustrates the divine and human effort to rebuild a functional society and re-inhabit the land after years of desolation. It highlights God's faithfulness in bringing His people back to their heritage and restoring their national and spiritual life, demonstrating His commitment to His covenant promises despite Israel's past failures. The return and resettlement, as detailed here, are a testament to God's redemptive work.
    • Identity and Lineage: For the returning exiles, knowing one's ancestry was paramount for social order, land inheritance, and especially for fulfilling specific roles within the temple and community. Obadiah's connection to Jeduthun, one of David's chief musicians (1 Chronicles 25:1), signifies the continuity of specific family roles in worship and the importance of maintaining proper order in the restored community. This emphasis on lineage underscores the Chronicler's concern for the continuity of God's covenant people.
    • Divine Providence and Preservation: Beneath the seemingly dry list of names lies a profound theological truth: God's sovereign care in preserving His covenant people, their heritage, and the continuity of His promises. Even in the midst of exile and return, God ensured the survival of a faithful remnant and the restoration of proper worship, demonstrating His unwavering commitment to His covenant. The very existence of these detailed records testifies to God's providential hand in preserving His people's identity and purpose.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Jeduthun (Hebrew, Yᵉdûwthûwn', H3038): Meaning "laudatory." Jeduthun was a prominent Levitical figure, one of the three chief musicians and seers appointed by King David, alongside Asaph and Heman (1 Chronicles 16:41-42). His descendants continued to serve in temple music, prophecy, and gatekeeping roles. Obadiah's lineage being traced to Jeduthun indicates his connection to a significant Levitical family with specific, hereditary responsibilities in the re-established temple worship, emphasizing the continuity of sacred service.
  • Berechiah (Hebrew, Berekyâh', H1296): Meaning "knee (i.e., blessing) of Jah." Berechiah, whose name signifies "Yahweh blesses" or "blessed by Yahweh," is identified as another Levite in this lineage. The meaning of his name subtly reinforces the theme of divine blessing and restoration inherent in the post-exilic return. His inclusion alongside Obadiah highlights the comprehensive nature of the Chronicler's record, acknowledging the contributions of various Levitical families to the rebuilding effort.
  • villages (Hebrew, châtsêr', H2691): Meaning "a yard (as inclosed by a fence); also a hamlet (as similarly surrounded with walls); court, tower, village." This term specifies the dwelling place of Obadiah and Berechiah. The use of "villages" rather than "Jerusalem" indicates the broader re-population efforts beyond the capital, emphasizing the re-establishment of Levitical presence and order throughout the land of Judah, supporting the central temple worship and ensuring spiritual well-being in outlying communities.
  • Netophathites (Hebrew, Nᵉṭôphâthîy', H5200): Referring to an "inhabitant of Netophah." This term identifies the specific locality where these Levites dwelt. Netophah was a town in Judah, south of Jerusalem, known as a place where Levites resided or where a significant number of returning exiles settled (Nehemiah 7:26). Their mention here underscores the re-population of specific Levitical settlements outside Jerusalem, indicating the spread of religious and community order beyond the capital and the re-establishment of the Levitical presence throughout the land.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And Obadiah the son of Shemaiah, the son of Galal, the son of Jeduthun": This clause meticulously identifies Obadiah and traces his lineage through three generations back to Jeduthun. This genealogical precision was crucial for establishing his identity and validating his potential role within the restored temple service, likely in the area of music or gatekeeping, as Jeduthun's family was renowned for these duties. The naming convention emphasizes the importance of family heritage and continuity in the re-establishment of the post-exilic community.
  • "and Berechiah the son of Asa, the son of Elkanah": This clause introduces Berechiah and similarly traces his lineage through two generations. While his direct ancestral connection isn't as explicitly tied to a famous figure as Obadiah's, his inclusion signifies his importance as another returning Levite. His presence in this record highlights the comprehensive effort to account for all who returned and contributed to the re-establishment of the community and its essential functions, particularly within the Levitical order.
  • "that dwelt in the villages of the Netophathites": This final clause specifies the shared residence of both Obadiah and Berechiah. The "villages of the Netophathites" were a recognized area for Levitical habitation, indicating their participation in the broader re-population efforts and their likely involvement in local religious or administrative duties outside Jerusalem. This detail underscores the decentralization of Levitical service, supporting the central temple worship and ensuring the spiritual well-being of the wider community.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device employed in 1 Chronicles 9:16, characteristic of much of the Chronicler's work, is Genealogy and List-making. While seemingly dry, these meticulous lists serve a profound theological and historical purpose. They establish continuity from the pre-exilic period to the post-exilic community, affirming God's faithfulness to His covenant promises by preserving a remnant and ensuring the proper order of worship and national life. This detailed enumeration also functions as a form of Historical Record, legitimizing the claims and roles of the returning exiles and providing a foundational document for the restored nation. Furthermore, the inclusion of specific ancestral ties, like Obadiah's connection to Jeduthun, employs Allusion, subtly referencing the rich history of temple service and Davidic worship. This allusive quality emphasizes the restoration and continuity of Israel's spiritual heritage, demonstrating God's meticulous care for His people's identity and function, even in the smallest details of their lineage and dwelling places.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

This seemingly mundane genealogical entry is deeply significant, illustrating God's meticulous care for His people and His unwavering commitment to restoring their identity and purpose after the trauma of exile. It underscores the biblical emphasis on community, order, and the faithful continuation of roles within God's covenant plan. Every individual, even those in a long list, contributes to the larger tapestry of God's redemptive history. The preservation of these lineages ensured the proper functioning of the temple and the nation, pointing to God's unwavering faithfulness to His promises, even when His people had been unfaithful. This passage reminds us that God's plan is comprehensive, valuing the specific contributions of each person in His grand design, demonstrating His sovereign hand in every detail of His people's restoration.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

1 Chronicles 9:16, though a brief mention in a long list of names, offers profound lessons for contemporary believers. It reminds us that God sees and values every individual's contribution, no matter how seemingly small or obscure in the grand scheme of His redemptive plan. Just as Obadiah and Berechiah played their part in the re-establishment of Israel's community and worship, so too are we called to faithfulness in our unique vocations and within our communities. Our spiritual heritage, passed down through generations of believers and recorded in Scripture, is a precious gift to be cherished and built upon. This verse encourages us to embrace our identity in Christ, understand our place within the larger body of believers, and diligently serve where God has placed us, trusting that our efforts contribute to His grand narrative, even if our names are not prominently recorded in human history. It cultivates a humility that recognizes God's sovereignty over every detail and a confidence that our service, however hidden, is seen and valued by Him, contributing to the ongoing work of His kingdom.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulous record-keeping in 1 Chronicles challenge our modern tendency to overlook "ordinary" contributions in favor of "extraordinary" ones, and what does this teach us about God's perspective?
  • In what ways does understanding our spiritual lineage—the history of faith and the church—inform our present-day walk with God and our sense of belonging within the global body of Christ?
  • What "village of the Netophathites" (i.e., specific, perhaps less glamorous, place of service) might God be calling you to faithfully inhabit and serve within your church or community, knowing that your contribution is significant to Him?

FAQ

Why are these specific names and lineages recorded in such detail?

Answer: These details were crucial for the post-exilic community to re-establish their national and religious identity. Lineage confirmed tribal affiliation, land rights, and, most importantly, eligibility for priestly and Levitical service. For example, Obadiah's connection to Jeduthun ensured the continuity of specific temple roles, such as music and gatekeeping, which were hereditary. This meticulous record-keeping provided a foundational structure for rebuilding a functional society and restoring proper worship according to God's covenant, ensuring that the right people were in the right roles for the spiritual and civic health of the nation.

What was the significance of "the villages of the Netophathites"?

Answer: Netophah was a town in Judah, and its "villages" likely refer to the surrounding settlements. It was known as a place where Levites resided, as indicated in lists of returnees like Nehemiah 7:26. For Obadiah and Berechiah to dwell there signifies their participation in the broader re-population of Judah outside Jerusalem, ensuring that Levitical presence and religious instruction were available throughout the land. This decentralization of Levitical service supported the central temple functions and helped to maintain spiritual order and teaching in the wider community, reaching beyond the capital city.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 9:16 meticulously details the re-establishment of Israel's physical and spiritual order through specific lineages, it ultimately points to the ultimate order and fulfillment found in Christ. The careful tracing of genealogies, like Obadiah's back to Jeduthun, underscores the importance of proper lineage for service and identity within the old covenant system. However, in the New Covenant, our identity and access to God are not based on physical descent or tribal affiliation, but on spiritual birth through faith in Jesus Christ (John 1:12-13). Jesus Himself is the fulfillment of all genealogies, the Son of David and the Great High Priest after the order of Melchizedek, whose priesthood transcends Levitical lineage (Hebrews 7:11-17). Through Him, all believers become part of a spiritual house, a royal priesthood, called to serve God not in specific Levitical roles tied to a physical temple, but as living sacrifices in the global temple of His church (Romans 12:1-2). Thus, the meticulous record-keeping of 1 Chronicles foreshadows God's ultimate precision in bringing forth the Messiah, through whom all who believe are grafted into the true lineage of faith, becoming co-heirs with Christ and participants in His eternal kingdom, fulfilling all the promises of God.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 9 verses 14–34

We have here a further account of the good posture which the affairs of religion were put into immediately upon the return of the people out of Babylon. They had smarted for their former neglect of ordinances and under the late want of ordinances. Both these considerations made them very zealous and forward in setting up the worship of God among them; so they began their worship of God at the right end. Instances hereof we have here.

I. Before the house of the Lord was built they had the house of the tabernacle, a plain and movable tent, which they made use of in the mean time. Those that cannot yet reach to have a temple must not be without a tabernacle, but be thankful for that and make the best of it. Never let God's work be left undone for want of a place to do it in.

II. In allotting to the priests and Levites their respective employments, they had an eye to the model that was drawn up by David, and Samuel the seer, Ch1 9:22. Samuel, in his time, had drawn the scheme of it, and laid the foundation, though the ark was then in obscurity, and David afterwards finished it, and both acted by immediate direction from God. Or David, as soon as he was anointed had this matter in his mind and consulted Samuel about it, though he was then in his troubles, and the plan was formed in concert between them. This perhaps had been little regarded for many ages; but now, after a long interruption, it was revived. In dividing the work, they observed these ancient land-marks.

III. The most of them dwelt at Jerusalem (Ch1 9:34), yet there were some that dwelt in the villages (Ch1 9:16, Ch1 9:22), because, it may be, there was not yet room for them in Jerusalem. However they were employed in the service of the tabernacle (Ch1 9:25): They were to come after seven days from time to time. They had their week's attendance in their turns.

IV. Many of the Levites were employed as porters at the gates of the house of God, four chief porters (Ch1 9:26), and, under them, others, to the number of 212, Ch1 9:22. They had the oversight of the gates (Ch1 9:23), were keepers of the thresholds, as in the margin (Ch1 9:19), and keepers of the entry. This seemed a mean office; and yet David would rather have it than dwell in the tents of wickedness, Psa 84:10. Their office was, 1. To open the doors of God's house every morning (Ch1 9:27) and shut them at night. 2. To keep off the unclean, and hinder those from thrusting in that were forbidden by the law. 3. To direct and introduce into the courts of the Lord those that came thither to worship, and to show them where to go and what to do, that they might not incur punishment. This required care, and diligence, and constant attendance. Ministers have work to do of this kind.

V. Here is one Phinehas, a son of Eleazar, that is said to be a ruler over them in time past (Ch1 9:20), not the famous high priest of that name, but (as is supposed) an eminent Levite, of whom it is here said that the Lord was with him, or (as the Chaldee reads it) the Word of the Lord was his helper - the eternal Word, who is Jehovah, the mighty one on whom help is laid.

VI. It is said of some of them that, because the charge was upon them, they lodged round about the house of God, Ch1 9:27. It is good for ministers to be near their work, that they may give themselves wholly to it. The Levites pitched about the tabernacle when they marched through the wilderness. Then they were porters in one sense, bearing the burdens of the sanctuary, now porters in another sense, attending the gates and the doors - in both instances keeping the charge of the sanctuary.

VII. Every one knew his charge. Some were entrusted with the plate, the ministering vessels, to bring them in and out by tale, Ch1 9:28. Others were appointed to prepare the fine flour, wine, oil, etc., Ch1 9:29. Others, that were priests, made up the holy anointing oil, Ch1 9:30. Others took care of the meat-offerings, Ch1 9:31. Others of the show-bread, Ch1 9:32. As in other great houses, so in God's house, the work is likely to be done well when every one knows the duty of his place and makes a business of it. God is the God of order: but that which is every body's work will be nobody's work.

VIII. The singers were employed in that work day and night, Ch1 9:33. They were the chief fathers of the Levites that made a business of it, not mean singing-men, that made a trade of it. They remained in the chambers of the temple, that they might closely and constantly attend it, and were therefore excused from all other services. It should seem, some companies were continually singing, at least at stated hours, both day and night. Thus was God continually praised, as it is fit he should be who is continually doing good. Thus devout people might, at any hour, have assistance in their devotion. Thus was the temple a figure of the heavenly one, where they rest not day nor night from praising God, Rev 4:8. Blessed are those that dwell in thy house; they will be still praising thee.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 14–34. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 9:16 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.