Skip to content
H8406

תְּבַר

tᵉbar /teb-ar'/ Ask about this word
(Aramaic) corresponding to שָׁבַר
to be fragile (figuratively)
broken.

Word Study

In depth

A plain-language study of tᵉbar — the range of meaning it carries, how Scripture actually uses it, and where it points. Written for readers who don’t know the original language.

Core Meaning & Semantic Range

The Aramaic word tᵉbar, represented by H8406, means to be broken or fragile. It appears only 1 time across 1 unique verse in the Bible. The term is used figuratively to describe a state of inherent fragility within a kingdom.

Biblical Occurrences & Contextual Analysis

The sole use of H8406 is found in the prophetic interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar's dream in the book of Daniel. It describes the feet and toes of the great image, which were a mixture of iron and clay. This composition signifies a divided and unstable nature, leading to the conclusion that "the kingdom shall be partly strong, and partly broken" Daniel 2:42.

Related Words & Concepts

Several related Aramaic words provide context for the state of being broken:

  • H8624 taqqîyph (mighty, strong): This word is used in direct contrast to H8406 within the same verse, describing the iron-like strength of one part of the kingdom while the other part is broken Daniel 2:42.
  • H2635 chăçaph (clay): This is the material that represents the kingdom's weakness. The mixture of iron with miry clay is the direct cause of its fragile, divided nature Daniel 2:41.
  • H4437 malkûw (kingdom): This is the subject described as being partly broken. The term is used throughout Daniel to refer to both human empires and the eternal dominion of God Daniel 2:44.

Theological Significance

The theological weight of H8406 is tied to its prophetic context in Daniel.

  • Prophetic Weakness: The term illustrates the inherent fragility and internal division of the final human empire depicted in the dream. Its "broken" state is not due to external attack but its own composite nature Daniel 2:42.
  • Inherent Instability: The state of being broken is a result of an impossible union. Just as iron and clay cannot truly mix, this kingdom's elements cannot cleave to one another, guaranteeing its instability Daniel 2:43.
  • Contrast with Divine Permanence: The brokenness of this earthly kingdom serves to highlight the strength of the coming kingdom of God, which "shall never be destroyed" and will break all other kingdoms in pieces Daniel 2:44.

Summary

In summary, H8406 tᵉbar, while appearing only once, offers a powerful and concise description of prophetic fragility. Its use in Daniel provides a key insight into the unstable nature of a divided human kingdom, setting the stage for the establishment of a perfect and eternal kingdom by God.

How the KJV Renders It

Translation

Strong’s lists the renderings but not their weight. These are counted from the King James text of the tagged verses — the bar under each is how often the translators actually reached for it. Select one to filter the occurrences below.

Grammatical Forms

Morphology

In the Hebrew Old Testament, this word appears as a verb across 1 occurrence, inflected in 1 grammatical form — each row is one form, and the bar is how often it is that form. Select any form to read what each part of its name means, and to filter the occurrence list to it.

  • תְבִירָה

Related Words

Related

Other entries the study above points to — each one is drawn from a reference it makes. Follow the trail to see how the words connect.

Theographic Context

Context

The people, places, and span of history the verses containing this word touch on — drawn from the theographic tagging of Scripture. Select any name to isolate its verses in the occurrence list.

Biblical Distribution

Distribution

1 verse, all in Daniel — and none of the other 38 Old Testament books.

Every Occurrence

Concordance

Every verse where the word is tagged in the King James text. Filter by book, by the English word the translators chose, by grammatical form, or search within the verses.

Sources. Definition and numbering: James Strong, Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible (1890). Morphology: STEPBible / Tyndale House (CC BY). Verse tagging: the King James text keyed to Strong’s numbers. Every count on this page is computed from the tagged corpus, not estimated.