Skip to content
H1751

דּוּק

dûwq /dook/ Ask about this word
(Aramaic) corresponding to דָּקַק
to crumble
be broken to pieces.

Word Study

In depth

A plain-language study of dûwq — the range of meaning it carries, how Scripture actually uses it, and where it points. Written for readers who don’t know the original language.

Core Meaning & Semantic Range

The Aramaic word dûwq, represented by H1751, is a specific term for being broken to pieces or to crumble. It is an extremely rare word, appearing only 1 time in 1 unique verse in the entire Bible. Its meaning is directly related to its Hebrew counterpart, דָּקַק.

Biblical Occurrences & Contextual Analysis

The sole appearance of H1751 is in Daniel's interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar's dream. In Daniel 2:35, it describes the catastrophic and simultaneous destruction of the statue's materials—the iron, clay, brass, silver, and gold. The verse states these components were broken to pieces together, becoming like chaff on a threshing floor, so utterly destroyed that the wind carried them away until no trace was left.

Related Words & Concepts

Several related Aramaic words provide a fuller context for the concept of destruction and impact:

  • H1855 dᵉqaq (to crumble or (trans.) crush; break to pieces): This word is used in conjunction with H1751 in its only appearance. It is frequently used throughout Daniel to describe destructive force, such as God's future kingdom which "shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms" Daniel 2:44.
  • H4223 mᵉchâʼ (to strike in pieces; also to arrest; specifically to impale; hang, smite, stay): This verb describes the action that leads to the state of being broken. It is used to describe the stone that smote the image, causing its destruction Daniel 2:34.

Theological Significance

The theological significance of H1751 is concentrated in its single, powerful image of divine judgment.

  • Irrevocable Judgment: The word contributes to the picture of the absolute and final judgment against the kingdoms of man. The crumbling of the statue's elements into dust signifies a destruction so complete that these earthly powers are permanently removed Daniel 2:35.
  • Supremacy of God's Kingdom: The action of being "broken to pieces" is the direct result of the stone striking the image. This demonstrates the overwhelming power of God's kingdom, before which all human empires are rendered as insignificant as chaff Daniel 2:35.

Summary

In summary, while H1751 is one of the rarest words in Scripture, its single use provides a vivid and unforgettable image. It communicates the idea of total and complete disintegration. Located within the prophetic vision of Daniel 2, it underscores the theme of God's ultimate authority and the inevitable demise of worldly powers when confronted by His eternal kingdom.

How the KJV Renders It

Translation

Strong’s lists the renderings but not their weight. These are counted from the King James text of the tagged verses — the bar under each is how often the translators actually reached for it. Select one to filter the occurrences below.

Grammatical Forms

Morphology

In the Hebrew Old Testament, this word appears as a verb across 1 occurrence, inflected in 1 grammatical form — each row is one form, and the bar is how often it is that form. Select any form to read what each part of its name means, and to filter the occurrence list to it.

  • דָּקוּ

Related Words

Related

Other entries the study above points to — each one is drawn from a reference it makes. Follow the trail to see how the words connect.

Theographic Context

Context

The people, places, and span of history the verses containing this word touch on — drawn from the theographic tagging of Scripture. Select any name to isolate its verses in the occurrence list.

Biblical Distribution

Distribution

1 verse, all in Daniel — and none of the other 38 Old Testament books.

Every Occurrence

Concordance

Every verse where the word is tagged in the King James text. Filter by book, by the English word the translators chose, by grammatical form, or search within the verses.

Sources. Definition and numbering: James Strong, Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible (1890). Morphology: STEPBible / Tyndale House (CC BY). Verse tagging: the King James text keyed to Strong’s numbers. Every count on this page is computed from the tagged corpus, not estimated.