Skip to content
H1625

גֵּרָה

gêrâh /gay-raw'/ Ask about this word
from גָּרַר
the cud (as scraping the throat)
cud.

Word Study

In depth

A plain-language study of gêrâh — the range of meaning it carries, how Scripture actually uses it, and where it points. Written for readers who don’t know the original language.

Core Meaning & Semantic Range

The Hebrew word gêrâh, represented by H1625, refers to the cud. It is derived from the word H1641 gârar, which describes the action of bringing up the cud. It appears 11 times across 9 unique verses in scripture. The term is used exclusively within the context of Old Testament dietary laws to distinguish between clean and unclean animals.

Biblical Occurrences & Contextual Analysis

In the books of Leviticus and Deuteronomy, H1625 is a primary criterion for determining which land animals are permissible to eat. An animal is considered clean if it both "cheweth the cud" and parteth the hoof (Leviticus 11:3, Deuteronomy 14:6). Conversely, animals that fulfill only one of these conditions are designated as unclean. For example, the camel H1581, the coney H8227, and the hare H768 are deemed unclean because, while they chew the cud, they do not have a divided hoof (Leviticus 11:4-6, Deuteronomy 14:7). The swine H2386 is also declared unclean because it has a divided hoof but does not chew the cud (Leviticus 11:7, Deuteronomy 14:8).

Related Words & Concepts

Several related words are essential for understanding the context of H1625:

  • H1641 gârar (to bring up the cud): This primitive root is the source of gêrâh and describes the action of ruminating. It is used directly in reference to the swine, which "cheweth not" the cud Leviticus 11:7.
  • H2931 ṭâmêʼ (foul in a religious sense; unclean): This term denotes the state of ritual impurity. Animals that do not meet the dual requirements of chewing the cud and having a parted hoof are declared unclean Leviticus 11:4-7.
  • H6536 pâraç (to split, distribute, part): This word refers to the other key characteristic for clean animals: the divided hoof. It is consistently used alongside the chewing of the cud to form the complete standard for clean beasts Leviticus 11:3.

Theological Significance

The significance of H1625 is primarily theological, tied to principles of holiness and obedience.

  • Ritual Purity: The act of chewing the cud is one of two physical markers God provided to help Israel distinguish between clean and unclean land animals. This distinction was central to maintaining ritual purity and separating them from defilement Leviticus 11:26.
  • Symbol of Divine Order: The law required two specific traits—chewing the cud and having a cloven hoof—for an animal to be considered clean Deuteronomy 14:6. An animal possessing only one of these traits, like the camel or swine, was seen as incomplete by this standard and therefore designated as unclean Deuteronomy 14:7-8.
  • Obedience to God's Law: Adherence to these dietary laws, including the rule concerning the cud, was an expression of Israel's covenant obedience to the Lord. The command was clear: "Whatsoever... cheweth the cud, among the beasts, that shall ye eat" Leviticus 11:3.

Summary

In summary, H1625 gêrâh is a highly specific term whose importance is found entirely within the framework of the Mosaic covenant's dietary regulations. It is not merely a biological description but a key component of a divine system for identifying purity and impurity. The presence or absence of chewing the cud served as a clear, observable sign that guided the daily life and worship of the Israelites, constantly reminding them of their call to be a holy and set-apart people. This illustrates how God used tangible details of creation to teach profound spiritual lessons about obedience and separation.

How the KJV Renders It

Translation

Strong’s lists the renderings but not their weight. These are counted from the King James text of the tagged verses — the bar under each is how often the translators actually reached for it. Select one to filter the occurrences below.

Grammatical Forms

Morphology

In the Hebrew Old Testament, this word appears as a noun across 11 occurrences, inflected in 1 grammatical form — each row is one form, and the bar is how often it is that form. Select any form to read what each part of its name means, and to filter the occurrence list to it.

  • גֵּרָה

Related Words

Related

Other entries the study above points to — each one is drawn from a reference it makes. Follow the trail to see how the words connect.

Theographic Context

Context

The people, places, and span of history the verses containing this word touch on — drawn from the theographic tagging of Scripture. Select any name to isolate its verses in the occurrence list.

Biblical Distribution

Distribution

Appears in 9 verses across 2 of the 39 books. Most frequent in Leviticus (6 verses); never once in the other 37.

6
Leviticus
3
Deuteronomy

Every Occurrence

Concordance

Every verse where the word is tagged in the King James text. Filter by book, by the English word the translators chose, by grammatical form, or search within the verses.

Sources. Definition and numbering: James Strong, Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible (1890). Morphology: STEPBible / Tyndale House (CC BY). Verse tagging: the King James text keyed to Strong’s numbers. Every count on this page is computed from the tagged corpus, not estimated.