Numbers 7:21

Translation
King James Version
One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
One H259 young H1241 bullock H6499, one H259 ram H352, one H259 lamb H3532 of the first H1121 year H8141, for a burnt offering H5930:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
one young bull, one ram, one male lamb in its first year as a burnt offering,
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
one young bull, one ram, and one male lamb a year old for a burnt offering;
Ask
American Standard Version
one young bullock, one ram, one he-lamb a year old, for a burnt-offering;
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
one young bull, one ram, one male lamb a year old, for a burnt offering;
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
A yong bullocke, a ram, a lambe of a yeere olde for a burnt offring,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
one bullock, a son of the herd, one ram, one lamb, a son of a year, for a burnt-offering;
Ask
See also
Romans 12:1Genesis 8:20Ephesians 5:2
In the KJVVerse 3,872 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Numbers 7:21 meticulously details a portion of the sacrificial offering presented by each tribal leader during the dedication of the Tabernacle: a young bullock, a ram, and a lamb of the first year, designated for a burnt offering. This verse, part of a highly repetitive and precise account, underscores the unified obedience, profound reverence, and costly dedication required of Israel in their corporate worship, establishing the sanctity and centrality of God's dwelling place among them. It highlights the divine standard for acceptable worship and the comprehensive nature of atonement and consecration under the Old Covenant.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Numbers 7:21 is situated within a lengthy and highly structured narrative (spanning Numbers 7:10-88) that meticulously records the identical offerings brought by each of the twelve tribal leaders over twelve consecutive days. This chapter immediately follows the completion and anointing of the Tabernacle (as described in Numbers 7:1 and Numbers 7:84-88), which had become the central locus of God's presence and worship in the wilderness. The deliberate repetition of the exact same list of offerings for each tribe, including the burnt offering specified in verse 21, serves a crucial literary and theological purpose: it emphasizes the unity, obedience, and equal commitment required from all segments of the Israelite community in their corporate worship and dedication to the Lord. This structural repetition reinforces the meticulousness of divine instruction and the comprehensive nature of the nation's consecration.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The dedication of the Tabernacle marked a pivotal moment in Israel's wilderness journey, signifying God's permanent dwelling among His people after their exodus from Egypt. The offerings described, particularly the burnt offering, were central to ancient Israelite worship, rooted in the sacrificial system established by God at Mount Sinai (e.g., Leviticus 1). These sacrifices served multiple purposes: expressing devotion, seeking atonement for sin, and establishing communion with God. The specific animals—a bullock, a ram, and a lamb of the first year—represented significant economic value and agricultural importance, indicating that the best and most precious were to be given to the Lord as an act of profound reverence and obedience. The meticulous nature of these offerings reflects a culture where ritual purity, adherence to divine law, and the concept of giving one's "first and best" were paramount for maintaining a right relationship with a holy God and ensuring the community's spiritual well-being.
  • Key Themes: Numbers 7:21 contributes to several overarching themes within the book of Numbers and the Pentateuch. Firstly, it highlights the theme of Divine Order and Obedience, showcasing Israel's precise adherence to God's detailed commands for worship and the construction of His dwelling place. The uniformity of the offerings across all tribes underscores the theme of Unity in Worship and National Identity, demonstrating a cohesive people united in their devotion to Yahweh. Furthermore, the emphasis on costly and unblemished animals for the burnt offering reinforces the theme of Holiness and Atonement, illustrating the seriousness of sin and the necessity of a perfect sacrifice to approach a holy God. This verse also implicitly points to the theme of God's Presence Among His People, as the entire dedication ceremony centers on the newly consecrated Tabernacle, the very place where God would meet with Israel, as detailed in Numbers 7:89. The meticulous nature of the offerings reflects the gravity and privilege of maintaining this divine presence.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • One (Hebrew, ʼechâd', H259): This numeral signifies singularity and unity. In the context of Numbers 7:21, its repetition before each animal ("One young bullock, one ram, one lamb") emphasizes the precise, singular nature of each component of the offering. It highlights the exact requirements set forth by God, leaving no room for deviation, and underscores the individual contribution of each type of animal to the complete burnt offering.
  • Young bullock (Hebrew, par bâqâr', H6499): The term par (H6499) refers specifically to a "bullock," often implying one that is vigorous and strong, while bâqâr (H1241) is a collective term for "beef cattle" or "ox family." Together, "young bullock" denotes a valuable, robust, and often costly male calf, typically used for significant offerings. Its inclusion signifies a substantial and precious gift, indicative of the worshiper's profound commitment and the magnitude of the dedication.
  • Lamb of the first year (Hebrew, kebes bên shâneh', H3532): Kebes (H3532) denotes a "lamb," specifically a male ram just old enough to butt, implying a young, healthy animal. The phrase bên shâneh (H1121, H8141) literally translates to "son of a year," signifying an animal that is approximately one year old. This precise age requirement underscores the animal's youth, purity, and lack of blemish, making it an ideal and unblemished sacrifice. It represents the finest and most perfect offering, essential for acceptance before a holy God.
  • Burnt offering (Hebrew, ‘ôlâh', H5930): Derived from the root ‘alah meaning "to ascend" or "to go up," the ‘ôlâh was unique in that the entire animal (excluding the hide, which went to the priest) was consumed by fire on the altar, its smoke ascending to God. This complete consumption symbolized total dedication, surrender, and devotion to God, signifying the worshiper's desire for full communion and acceptance without reservation. It was often offered as a general act of worship or to atone for unintentional sin, representing a comprehensive act of consecration.

Verse Breakdown

  • "One young bullock,": This specifies a male calf, typically one to three years old, signifying a valuable and robust animal. The bullock was the largest and most costly of the animals prescribed for the burnt offering, representing a substantial gift and a significant act of devotion, often associated with offerings for the community or for leaders, emphasizing the magnitude of the dedication.
  • "one ram,": This refers to a male sheep, mature but not necessarily old, which was a common sacrificial animal. Its inclusion alongside the bullock and lamb demonstrates a comprehensive offering, encompassing different types of valuable livestock, further emphasizing the completeness and richness of the dedication presented to God.
  • "one lamb of the first year,": This refers to a male lamb, approximately one year old, specifically chosen for its youth, vigor, and presumed purity, as required for acceptable sacrifices. The "lamb of the first year" was considered unblemished and ideal, embodying innocence and perfection, a vital characteristic for any offering presented before a holy God.
  • "for a burnt offering:": This concluding phrase explicitly states the purpose of these animals. They were designated for the ‘olah, the whole burnt offering, which was entirely consumed by fire on the altar. This type of offering symbolized total surrender, complete devotion, and the worshiper's desire for full acceptance and atonement before God, with the ascending smoke representing a pleasing aroma to the Lord, indicating divine acceptance and reconciliation.

Literary Devices

Numbers 7:21, as an integral part of the broader chapter, prominently features Repetition and Formulaic Language. The exact same list of animals for the burnt offering is meticulously repeated twelve times, once for each tribal leader. This deliberate and extensive repetition is not merely for emphasis but serves to underscore the unity of the tribes in their worship, their collective adherence to divine instruction, and the precise, unchanging nature of God's requirements for approaching Him. Furthermore, the selection of specific animals (bullock, ram, lamb) carries significant Symbolism. Each animal, in its inherent value and designated characteristics (e.g., the purity and youth of the "lamb of the first year"), symbolically represents the worshiper's best and most precious offering, signifying complete devotion and the desire for unblemished acceptance before a holy God. The act of the "burnt offering" itself is a powerful Symbol of total consecration, atonement, and the worshiper's desire for full communion with God, with the ascending smoke representing a pleasing aroma to the Lord. The extreme Precision in detailing the animals highlights the importance of exact obedience to God's commands in all matters of worship, emphasizing that God's standards are not arbitrary but reflect His holy character.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Numbers 7:21, in its precise enumeration of sacrificial animals, profoundly illustrates the Old Covenant's emphasis on atonement, dedication, and the meticulous nature of approaching a holy God. The burnt offering, entirely consumed by fire, symbolized complete surrender and the worshiper's desire for full acceptance and reconciliation. This act of giving the best and most valuable animals underscored the costliness of approaching God and the seriousness of sin, even as it provided a temporary means of reconciliation and communion. The uniformity of the offerings across all tribes also highlighted the unity of Israel in their worship and their shared covenant relationship with Yahweh, demonstrating a collective commitment to divine law and spiritual purity. Ultimately, these repeated, costly sacrifices pointed forward to a greater, final offering that would truly and eternally atone for sin.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While the practice of animal sacrifice has been fulfilled in Christ, Numbers 7:21 offers enduring and profound lessons for contemporary believers. The principle of giving our "best" to God remains paramount. Just as the Israelites brought valuable and unblemished animals, we are called to offer our most precious resources—our time, talents, finances, and even our very lives—as acts of worship and dedication. This verse challenges us to consider if our service and devotion are truly "whole burnt offerings," consumed by our love for God and fully surrendered to His will, or if we hold back portions for ourselves out of self-interest or lukewarmness. It calls us to a life of complete consecration, where every aspect of our being is presented to Him as a living sacrifice. Furthermore, the unity reflected in the identical offerings of the tribes reminds us of the importance of corporate worship and the need for the body of Christ to be united in purpose and devotion, collectively seeking to honor God according to His revealed will. Our worship, whether individual or communal, should always stem from a heart of reverence, obedience, and gratitude for God's holiness and His gracious provision for our atonement and fellowship.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of my life am I holding back from offering my "best" to God, perhaps giving Him only what is convenient or leftover?
  • How can my daily life become more of a "burnt offering," a complete act of surrender and devotion to God, reflecting total consecration?
  • What does the uniformity of the tribal offerings teach me about the importance of unity, shared purpose, and obedience in corporate worship today?

FAQ

Why were these specific animals (bullock, ram, lamb) required for the burnt offering?

Answer: The selection of a young bullock, a ram, and a lamb of the first year for the burnt offering was significant for several reasons, reflecting both economic value and symbolic purity. Firstly, these animals represented increasing levels of value and agricultural importance, from the costly bullock to the unblemished lamb of the first year. This variety ensured that the offering was substantial and comprehensive, reflecting a complete dedication. Secondly, each animal had symbolic significance within the sacrificial system, often representing different aspects of the worshiper's offering or the nature of the atonement. The "lamb of the first year," in particular, emphasized purity, innocence, and being unblemished, a crucial characteristic for an offering presented to a holy God. The specific requirements for these animals, as detailed throughout Leviticus 1, underscored the meticulousness and precision God demanded in worship, ensuring that only the finest and most appropriate sacrifices were brought before Him.

What was the primary spiritual significance of the "burnt offering" (olah) compared to other sacrifices?

Answer: The "burnt offering" (Hebrew: ‘olah) held a unique and profound spiritual significance among Israelite sacrifices. Unlike other offerings where portions were returned to the worshiper or given to the priests, the ‘olah was entirely consumed by fire on the altar, with its smoke ascending to God. This complete consumption symbolized total dedication, absolute surrender, and unreserved devotion to God. It was an offering of "wholeness" where the worshiper sought complete acceptance and communion with God, signifying that their entire being was consecrated to Him. While it also had an atoning aspect for unintentional sins, its primary emphasis was on expressing profound reverence, worship, and the desire for reconciliation and fellowship with a holy God. It was often offered as a general act of worship or to initiate a covenant relationship, as powerfully seen in the dedication of the Tabernacle in Numbers 7.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Numbers 7:21, with its detailed prescription for the burnt offering, finds its ultimate and perfect fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. The "one young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year" collectively point to the singular, perfect sacrifice of the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!, Jesus Christ. Unlike these Old Covenant sacrifices, which were merely a shadow and needed to be repeated daily and annually because they could never truly take away sins (as highlighted in Hebrews 10:1-4), Christ's offering of Himself was a "once for all" sacrifice (as declared in Hebrews 10:10). Just as the burnt offering was entirely consumed, symbolizing complete dedication and acceptance, Christ's sacrifice was a full and complete surrender to the Father's will, perfectly pleasing to God and providing eternal redemption for all who believe. The purity and "first year" quality of the lamb foreshadowed Christ's sinless nature, for He was the spotless Lamb without blemish or defect, whose precious blood alone could truly take away the sin of the world. Through His perfect, all-sufficient offering, we are granted direct access to God, fulfilling the symbolic ascent of the burnt offering in a new and living way (as described in Hebrews 10:19-20).

Copy as

Commentary on Numbers 7 verses 10–89

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We have here an account of the great solemnity of dedicating the altars, both that of burnt-offerings and that of incense; they had been sanctified before, when they were anointed (Lev 8:10, Lev 8:11), but now they were handselled, as it were, by the princes, with their free-will offerings. They began the use of them with rich presents, great expressions of joy and gladness, and extraordinary respect to those tokens of God's presence with them. Now observe here,

I. That the princes and great men were first and forwardest in the service of God. Those that are entitled to precedency should go before in good works, and that is true honour. Here is an example to the nobility and gentry, those that are in authority and of the first rank in their country; they ought to improve their honour and power, their estate and interest, for the promoting of religion, and the service of God, in the places where they live. It is justly expected that those who have more than others should do more good than others with what they have, else they are unfaithful stewards, and will not make up their account with joy. Nay, great men must not only with their wealth and power assist and protect those that serve God, but they must make conscience of being devout and religious themselves, and employing themselves in the exercises of piety, which will greatly redound to the honour of God (Psa 138:4, Psa 138:5), and have a good influence upon others, who will be the more easily persuaded to acts of devotion when they see them thus brought into reputation. It is certain that the greatest of men is less than the least of the ordinances of God; nor are the meanest services of religion any disparagement to those that make the greatest figure in the world.

II. The offerings they brought were very rich and valuable, so rich that some think there was not so great a difference in estate between them and others as that they were able to bear the expense of them themselves, but that the heads of each tribe contributed to the offering which their prince brought.

1.They brought some things to remain for standing service, twelve large silver dishes, each about sixty ounces weight, as many large silver cups, or bowls, of about thirty-five ounces - the former to be used for the meat-offerings, the latter for the drink-offerings - the former for the flesh of the sacrifices, the latter for the blood. The latter was God's table (as it were), and it was fit that so great a King should be served in plate. The golden spoons being filled with incense were intended, it is probable, for the service of the golden altar, for both the altars were anointed at the same time. Note, In works of piety and charity we ought to be generous according as our ability is. He that is the best should be served with the best we have. The Israelites indeed might well afford to part with their gold and silver in abundance to the service of the sanctuary, for they needed it not to buy meat and victual their camp, being daily fed with bread from heaven; nor did they need it to buy land, or pay their army, for they were shortly to be put in possession of Canaan.

2.They brought some things to be used immediately, offerings of each sort, burnt-offerings, sin-offerings, and a great many peace-offerings (on part of which they were to feast with their friends), and the meat-offerings that were to be annexed to them. Hereby they signified their thankful acceptance of, and cheerful submission to, all those laws concerning the sacrifices which God had lately by Moses delivered to them. And, though it was a time of joy and rejoicing, yet it is observable that still in the midst of their sacrifices we find a sin-offering. Since in our best services we are conscious to ourselves that there is a mixture of sin, it is fit that there should be even in our most joyful services a mixture of repentance. In all our approaches to God, we must by faith have an eye to Christ as the great sin-offering, and make mention of him.

3.They brought their offerings each on a separate day, in the order that they had been lately put into, so that the solemnity lasted twelve days. So God appointed (Num 7:11): They shall bring their offering, each prince on his day, and so they did. One sabbath must needs fall within the twelve days, if not two, but it should seem they did not intermit on the sabbath, for it was holy work, proper enough for a holy day. God appointed that it should thus be done on several days, (1.) That solemnity might be prolonged, and so might be universally taken notice of by all Israel, and the remembrance of it more effectually preserved. (2.) That an equal honour might thereby be put upon each tribe respectively; in Aaron's breast-plate each had his precious stone, so in this offering each had his day. (3.) Thus it would be done more decently and in order; God's work should not be done confusedly, and in a hurry; take time, and we shall have done the sooner, or at least we shall have done the better. (4.) God hereby signified how much pleased he is, and how much pleased we should be, with the exercises of piety and devotion. The repetition of them should be a continual pleasure to us, and we must not be weary of well doing. If extraordinary service be required to be done for twelve days together, we must not shrink from it, nor call it a task and a burden. (5.) The priests and Levites, having this occasion to offer the same sacrifices, and those some of every sort, every day, for so many days together, would have their hands well set in, and would be well versed in the laws concerning them. (6.) The peace-offerings were all to be eaten the same day they were offered, and two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, and five lambs, were enough for one day's festival; had there been more, especially if all had been brought on one day, there might have been danger of excess. The virtue of temperance must not be left, under pretence of the religion of feasting.

4.All their offerings were exactly the same, without any variation, though it is probable that neither the princes nor the tribes were all alike rich; but thus it was intimated that all the tribes of Israel had an equal share in the altar, and an equal interest in the sacrifices that were offered upon it. Though one tribe was posted more honourably in the camp than another, yet they and their services were all alike acceptable to God. Nor must we have faith of our Lord Jesus Christ with respect to persons, Jam 2:1.

5.Nahshon, the prince of the tribe of Judah, offered first, because God had given that tribe the first post of honour in the camp; and the rest of the tribes acquiesced, and offered in the same order in which God had appointed them to encamp. Judah, of which tribe Christ came, first, and then the rest; thus, in the dedication of souls to God, every man is presented in his own order, Christ the first-fruits, Co1 15:23. Some observe that Nahshon is the only one that is not expressly called a prince (Num 7:12), which the Jews give this account of: he is not called a prince, that he might not be puffed up because he offered first; and all the others are called princes because they (though some of them of the elder house) submitted, and offered after him. Or, because the title of prince of Judah did more properly belong to Christ, for unto him shall the gathering of the people be.

6.Though the offerings were all the same, yet the account of them is repeated at large for each tribe, in the same words. We are sure there are no vain repetitions in scripture; what then shall we make of these repetitions? Might it not have served to say of this noble jury that the same offering which their foreman brought each on his day brought likewise? No, God would have it specified for each tribe: and why so? (1.) It was for the encouragement of these princes, and of their respective tribes, that each of their offerings being recorded at large no slight might seem to be put upon them; for rich and poor meet together before God. (2.) It was for the encouragement of all generous acts of piety and charity, by letting us know that what is so given is lent to the Lord, and he carefully records it, with every one's name prefixed to his gift, because what is so given he will pay again, and even a cup of cold water shall have its reward. He is not unrighteous, to forget either the cost or the labour of love, Heb 6:10. We find Christ taking particular notice of what was cast into the treasury, Mar 12:41. Though what is offered be but little, though it be a contribution to the charity of others, yet if it be according to our ability it shall be recorded, that it may be recompensed in the resurrection of the just.

7.The sum total is added at the foot of the account (Num 7:84-88), to show how much God was pleased with the mention of his freewill-offerings, and what a great deal they amounted to in the whole, when every prince brought in his quota! How greatly would the sanctuary of God be enriched and beautified if all would in their places do their part towards it, by exemplary purity and devotion, extensive charity, and universal usefulness!

8.God signified his gracious acceptance of these presents that were brought him, by speaking familiarly to Moses, as a man speaks to his friend, from off the mercy-seat (Num 7:89, Num 12:8); and in speaking to him he did in effect speak to all Israel, showing them this token for good, Psa 103:7. Note, By this we may know that God hears and accepts our prayers if he gives us grace to hear and receive his word, for thus our communion with him is maintained and kept up. I know not why we may not suppose that upon each of the days on which these offerings were brought (probably while the priests and offerers were feasting upon the peace-offerings) Moses was in the tabernacle, receiving some of those laws and orders which we have already met with in this and the foregoing book. And here the excellent bishop Patrick observes that God's speaking to Moses thus by an audible articulate voice, as if he had been clothed with a holy body, might be looked upon as an earnest of the incarnation of the Son of God in the fulness of time, when the Word should be made flesh, and speak in the language of the sons of men. For, however God at sundry times and in divers manners spoke unto the fathers, he has in these last days spoken unto us by his Son. And that he who now spoke to Moses, as the shechinah or divine Majesty, from between the cherubim, was the eternal Word, the second person in the Trinity, was the pious conjecture of many of the ancients; for all God's communion with man is by his Son, by whom he made the world, and rules the church, and who is the same yesterday, today, and for ever.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 10–89. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Numbers 7:21 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.