Numbers 35:14

KJV

Ye shall give three cities on this side Jordan, and three cities shall ye give in the land of Canaan, [which] shall be cities of refuge.

KJV (with Strong's)

Ye shall give {H5414} three {H7969} cities {H5892} on this side {H5676} Jordan {H3383}, and three {H7969} cities {H5892} shall ye give {H5414} in the land {H776} of Canaan {H3667}, which shall be cities {H5892} of refuge {H4733}.

Complete Jewish Bible

You are to give three cities east of the Yarden and three cities in the land of Kena'an; they will be cities of refuge.

Berean Standard Bible

Select three cities across the Jordan and three in the land of Canaan as cities of refuge.

American Standard Version

Ye shall give three cities beyond the Jordan, and three cities shall ye give in the land of Canaan; they shall be cities of refuge.

Commentary

### SUMMARY
Numbers 35:14 specifies God's directive for the establishment of six cities of refuge, meticulously dividing them geographically: three east of the Jordan River and three within the land of Canaan (west of the Jordan). This divine command underscores God's commitment to both justice and mercy, ensuring that individuals who had unintentionally caused the death of another would have accessible sanctuary from the avenger of blood, thereby preventing unchecked retaliation and upholding a fair legal process within the nascent Israelite society.

### CONTEXT
* **Literary Context:** Numbers 35:14 is situated within a broader legal and administrative section of the book of Numbers, specifically following the detailed instructions for the allocation of land among the Israelite tribes (Numbers 34). Chapter 35 itself begins with commands concerning the provision for the Levites, who, unlike the other tribes, were not to receive a territorial inheritance but rather specific cities and pasturelands scattered throughout the tribal allotments (Numbers 35:1-8). Within this framework, a subset of these Levitical cities was uniquely designated as "cities of refuge" (Numbers 35:9-15). The verses immediately preceding Numbers 35:14 (Numbers 35:9-13) articulate the primary purpose of these cities: to serve as a sanctuary for those who had accidentally killed someone, protecting them from the "avenger of blood" until they could stand trial before the community. Numbers 35:14, therefore, provides the practical, geographical implementation of this divinely ordained system, ensuring equitable access to justice across the entire Promised Land. The subsequent verses (Numbers 35:16-34) further elaborate on the legal distinctions between intentional murder and accidental homicide, and the procedures for trial and residence within the cities of refuge.
* **Historical & Cultural Context:** In the ancient Near East, the concept of blood vengeance (known as *go'el haddam* or "avenger of blood" in Israelite law) was a deeply ingrained social custom. If a person was killed, it was the duty and right of the victim's closest male relative to avenge the death, often by killing the perpetrator. This system, while intended to maintain order, could easily spiral into destructive blood feuds. God's institution of cities of refuge in Israel served as a crucial modification and refinement of this custom, demonstrating a unique divine concern for due process and the distinction between premeditated murder and accidental death. The geographical distribution ("on this side Jordan" refers to the Transjordanian territories of Reuben, Gad, and half-Manasseh, while "in the land of Canaan" refers to the Cisjordanian territories) was vital given the physical landscape and the modes of travel. The Jordan River, while fordable at points, represented a significant geographical and sometimes political divide. Ensuring cities on both sides guaranteed accessibility for all Israelite tribes, reflecting a centralized, equitable legal system that transcended immediate tribal boundaries. This system was revolutionary in its provision of a legal framework for unintentional homicide, moving beyond simple retribution to a more nuanced concept of justice.
* **Key Themes:** The establishment of the cities of refuge in Numbers 35 contributes significantly to several overarching themes within the book of Numbers and the Pentateuch. Firstly, it powerfully illustrates the theme of **Divine Justice and Mercy**. God, as the ultimate Lawgiver, demands accountability for the taking of human life (Numbers 35:30-31), yet He also provides a pathway for mercy and protection for those whose actions were unintentional (Numbers 35:15). This system carefully distinguishes between different degrees of culpability, reflecting God's nuanced understanding of human intent and His desire for a just society. Secondly, it reinforces the **Sanctity of Human Life**. The very existence of these cities, and the detailed laws surrounding them, underscore the immense value God places on human life. Even an accidental death required a formal legal process and a designated sanctuary, emphasizing the gravity of taking a life and the need for a righteous resolution, preventing the land from being defiled by innocent blood (Numbers 35:33-34). Thirdly, the precise geographical distribution of the cities (three on each side of the Jordan) highlights God's **Providence and Order**. This strategic placement ensures that refuge was readily accessible from any part of the land, demonstrating God's foresight and practical wisdom in establishing an orderly and just society where protection was available to all who legitimately needed it, reflecting His desire for a well-ordered community under His covenant. This theme is further explored in other passages detailing the land's distribution and the establishment of order, such as in [Deuteronomy 4](/deuteronomy/4 "Deuteronomy 4 - Moses' Exhortation to Obedience").

### EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
#### Key Word Analysis
* **Refuge (Hebrew, _miklat'_):** This term, derived from the verb _qalat_ (קָלַט), meaning "to receive," "to gather," or "to take in," specifically denotes a place of asylum or sanctuary. It conveys the idea of a secure harbor or a designated safe haven where one could find protection from immediate danger and the swift hand of vengeance. Unlike a mere hiding place, a _miklat_ city was an officially sanctioned legal institution, emphasizing its role in providing due process and legal protection rather than simply facilitating escape. The term underscores the divine establishment of these cities as places of lawful asylum, not just informal shelters.
* **Jordan (Hebrew, _Yarden'_):** The Jordan River is a prominent geographical feature throughout biblical narratives, serving as both a physical boundary and a symbolic marker. In this context, "on this side Jordan" (east of the river) refers to the territories already settled by the tribes of Reuben, Gad, and half of Manasseh, who had chosen to remain outside the primary land of Canaan. "In the land of Canaan" (west of the river) refers to the main inheritance promised to Abraham's descendants. The specific mention of the Jordan highlights the comprehensive nature of God's provision for justice, extending protection equally to Israelites on both sides of this significant geographical divide, ensuring accessibility for all tribes.

#### Verse Breakdown
* **"Ye shall give three cities on this side Jordan":** This clause specifies the initial allocation of half of the cities of refuge. "This side Jordan" refers to the eastern bank of the Jordan River, encompassing the territories already settled by the tribes of Reuben, Gad, and the half-tribe of Manasseh. This directive demonstrates God's foresight in ensuring that immediate sanctuary would be available to the Israelite population even before the full conquest and settlement of the land of Canaan proper. It underscores the principle of accessibility, making refuge readily available to all Israelites regardless of their initial tribal allocation.
* **"and three cities shall ye give in the land of Canaan":** This second clause completes the geographical distribution, mandating the establishment of the remaining three cities of refuge on the western side of the Jordan River, within the heart of the Promised Land. The phrase "land of Canaan" denotes the primary inheritance for the majority of the Israelite tribes. This symmetrical distribution (three on each side) emphasizes the comprehensive and equitable nature of God's provision, ensuring that no Israelite, regardless of their location within the tribal territories, would be unduly distant from a designated city of refuge, thereby facilitating swift access to legal protection.
* **"[which] shall be cities of refuge":** This concluding phrase explicitly states the purpose and function of these six designated cities. They are not merely Levitical cities but are specifically set apart as places of "refuge" (Hebrew: _miklat_). This designation highlights their unique legal and social role as sanctuaries for those accused of unintentional homicide, providing a crucial mechanism for due process and protection from the "avenger of blood." It underscores the divine authority behind their establishment and their vital role in maintaining justice and order within the Israelite community, distinguishing accidental death from premeditated murder.

#### Literary Devices
Numbers 35:14, while a legal directive, employs several subtle literary devices. The most prominent is **Repetition** and **Parallelism**, seen in the balanced structure of "three cities on this side Jordan, and three cities shall ye give in the land of Canaan." This symmetrical phrasing emphasizes the equitable and comprehensive nature of God's provision, ensuring accessibility across the entire breadth of the Israelite territory. The geographical distinction of "this side Jordan" and "in the land of Canaan" also functions as **Merism**, where two contrasting parts are mentioned to represent the whole, signifying that the cities of refuge are to be established throughout the entirety of the land where Israel would dwell. Furthermore, the verse functions as a **Legal Edict** within a broader legislative corpus, characterized by its prescriptive tone and direct command, reflecting the authoritative voice of God establishing foundational laws for His covenant people.

### THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Numbers 35:14, by detailing the geographical distribution of the cities of refuge, powerfully reinforces the theological principle of God's universal and accessible provision for justice and mercy. These cities were not merely a human innovation but a divine institution, designed to uphold the sanctity of human life while offering a pathway for due process and protection for the unintentionally guilty. This system demonstrates God's meticulous care for His people, ensuring that His legal framework was not only righteous but also practical and equitable, preventing unchecked vengeance and promoting a society governed by divine statutes. The concept reflects God's character as both a righteous judge who demands accountability and a compassionate Father who provides sanctuary.

* [Deuteronomy 19:2-9](/deuteronomy/19-2 "Deuteronomy 19:2-9 - Further Laws for Cities of Refuge")
* [Joshua 20:7-9](/joshua/20-7 "Joshua 20:7-9 - The Appointment of the Cities of Refuge")
* [Psalm 46:1](/psalm/46-1 "Psalm 46:1 - God as Our Refuge and Strength")

### REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
The ancient institution of the cities of refuge, as detailed in Numbers 35:14, offers profound insights for contemporary reflection and application. It reveals a God who is deeply concerned with justice, yet equally committed to mercy. In a world often quick to condemn and slow to understand, these cities remind us of the divine imperative to distinguish between intentional malice and unintentional harm, advocating for due process and a fair hearing. For us today, this translates into a call to cultivate communities that offer grace and understanding, where individuals can find support and a path to restoration, rather than immediate condemnation, when they have caused harm, particularly if unintentional. It challenges us to build systems that protect the vulnerable and ensure equitable access to justice, mirroring God's own meticulous provision. Spiritually, it prompts us to consider where we run for refuge when we are overwhelmed by guilt, fear, or the consequences of our actions, pointing us to the ultimate sanctuary found in God's grace.

#### Questions for Reflection
* **How does the concept of cities of refuge challenge our modern understanding of justice and mercy?**
* **In what ways can our communities (churches, families, workplaces) embody the principles of refuge and due process?**
* **Where do you personally seek refuge when facing the consequences of your own actions or the accusations of others?**
* **How does God's meticulous planning for the cities of refuge speak to His character and His care for humanity?**

### FAQ

**What was the primary purpose of the cities of refuge?**

Answer: The primary purpose of the cities of refuge was to provide a sanctuary and legal protection for individuals who had unintentionally caused the death of another person. In ancient Israel, a "blood avenger" (the victim's next of kin) had the right to pursue and kill the perpetrator. The cities of refuge served as a divinely ordained mechanism to prevent unchecked blood feuds and ensure that those accused of accidental homicide could receive a fair trial before the community elders. If found innocent of premeditated murder, the individual would reside in the city of refuge until the death of the current high priest, after which they could return to their home (Numbers 35:25-28). This system balanced the sanctity of human life with the principle of mercy and due process.

**Why were there six cities of refuge, three on each side of the Jordan?**

Answer: The specific number and geographical distribution of the six cities of refuge (three east of the Jordan River and three west, in the land of Canaan) were designed to ensure maximum accessibility for all Israelites, regardless of their tribal territory. The Jordan River was a significant geographical barrier, and by placing cities on both sides, God ensured that anyone in the land could reach a city of refuge quickly to escape the immediate pursuit of the avenger of blood. This strategic placement reflects God's foresight and practical wisdom in establishing an equitable and effective system of justice and protection for His people (Joshua 20:7-8).

**How did the cities of refuge distinguish between accidental death and murder?**

Answer: The cities of refuge were central to distinguishing between accidental death and premeditated murder. Upon reaching a city of refuge, the individual would present their case to the elders at the city gate (Joshua 20:4). They would then be protected from the avenger of blood until they could be brought before the full assembly of the community for trial (Numbers 35:12). During this trial, evidence would be presented, and witnesses heard. If it was determined that the killing was indeed unintentional—for example, without malice or intent, such as an axe head flying off and striking someone (Deuteronomy 19:5)—the accused would remain in the city of refuge. However, if the killing was found to be premeditated murder, the perpetrator would be handed over to the avenger of blood for execution (Numbers 35:30-31). This system provided a crucial legal framework for discerning intent and administering justice accordingly.

### CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The cities of refuge, as commanded in Numbers 35:14, serve as a profound Old Testament type pointing to the ultimate refuge found in Jesus Christ. Just as these ancient cities provided a safe haven for the unintentionally guilty, protecting them from the avenger of blood and offering a path to due process, so too does Christ offer sanctuary from the just wrath of God against sin. We, as humanity, are all "guilty" in a spiritual sense, not always of intentional malice, but certainly of falling short of God's perfect standard, and the "avenger of blood" in this spiritual analogy is the righteous judgment of God against sin (Romans 3:23). However, through faith in Jesus, who is our High Priest (Hebrews 4:14), we find a secure and eternal dwelling place, a sanctuary where we are protected from condemnation (Romans 8:1). He is the "hope set before us," to whom we can "flee for refuge" (Hebrews 6:18). His atoning sacrifice on the cross, the shedding of His innocent blood, fully satisfies the demands of divine justice, allowing mercy to triumph without compromising righteousness. In Him, we are not merely temporarily protected until a high priest dies, but we receive eternal life and complete forgiveness, freely entering into God's presence with confidence (Hebrews 10:19-22), finding our ultimate and permanent refuge in the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29).

Note: Commentary is generated by AI with a directive for Biblical fidelity. Always rely on the Holy Spirit for discernment. The Scripture text and cross-references are from verified, non-AI sources.

Cross-References

Deuteronomy 4:41

¶ Then Moses severed three cities on this side Jordan toward the sunrising;

Deuteronomy 4:43

[Namely], Bezer in the wilderness, in the plain country, of the Reubenites; and Ramoth in Gilead, of the Gadites; and Golan in Bashan, of the Manassites.

Joshua 20:7

¶ And they appointed Kedesh in Galilee in mount Naphtali, and Shechem in mount Ephraim, and Kirjatharba, which [is] Hebron, in the mountain of Judah.

Joshua 20:9

These were the cities appointed for all the children of Israel, and for the stranger that sojourneth among them, that whosoever killeth [any] person at unawares might flee thither, and not die by the hand of the avenger of blood, until he stood before the congregation.

Deuteronomy 19:8

And if the LORD thy God enlarge thy coast, as he hath sworn unto thy fathers, and give thee all the land which he promised to give unto thy fathers;

Deuteronomy 19:10

That innocent blood be not shed in thy land, which the LORD thy God giveth thee [for] an inheritance, and [so] blood be upon thee.