TRV
- English
- King James KJV
- Complete Jewish CJB
- World English WEBM
- Berean Standard BSB
- American Standard ASV
- Geneva GNV
- Young's Literal YLT
- Douay-Rheims DRC
- International
- Shqip ALB
- العربية SVD
- বাংলা BN-IRV
- မြန်မာ Judson
- 简体文 CUV-S
- 繁體中文 CUV-T
- Čeština BKR
- Nederlands STVE
- Français LSG
- Deutsch SCH
- Ελληνικά Vamvas
- ગુજરાતી GU-IRV
- Hausa HCB
- עברית Hebrew
- हिन्दी HCV
- Magyar KAROLI
- Bahasa Indonesia INDO-TB
- Italiano Diodati
- 日本語 Kougo
- 한국어 Korean
- മലയാളം MAL
- मराठी MRCV
- Norsk DNB
- فارسی OPV
- Polski BG
- Português Almeida
- Română Cornilescu
- Русский Synodal
- Español RVG
- Kiswahili Neno
- Svenska SV1917
- Tagalog TAG-ADB
- தமிழ் TCV
- తెలుగు TSA
- ภาษาไทย THAI-KJV
- Українська Ohienko
- Tiếng Việt CADMAN
- Yorùbá YCB
King James Version
Ye shall give three cities on this side Jordan, and three cities shall ye give in the land of Canaan, which shall be cities of refuge.
Complete Jewish Bible
You are to give three cities east of the Yarden and three cities in the land of Kena'an; they will be cities of refuge.
Berean Standard Bible
Select three cities across the Jordan and three in the land of Canaan as cities of refuge.
American Standard Version
Ye shall give three cities beyond the Jordan, and three cities shall ye give in the land of Canaan; they shall be cities of refuge.
World English Bible Messianic
You shall give three cities beyond the Jordan, and you shall give three cities in the land of Canaan. They shall be cities of refuge.
Geneva Bible (1599)
Ye shall appoint three on this side Iorden, and ye shall appoint three cities in the lande of Canaan which shalbe cities of refuge.
Young's Literal Translation
the three of the cities ye give beyond the Jordan, and the three of the cities ye give in the land of Canaan; cities of refuge they are.
Translation
In the KJVVerse 4,860 of 31,102 · 15.6%
LawLawHistoryHistPoetryPoetProphetsProphNew TestamentNT
Study this verse
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying Numbers 35:14 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Numbers 35:14 articulates a precise divine command for the establishment of six cities of refuge, strategically divided: three situated east of the Jordan River and three within the land of Canaan (west of the Jordan). This directive is a foundational element of Israelite law, underscoring God's intricate balance of justice and mercy. It ensures that individuals who had unintentionally caused the death of another would possess accessible sanctuary from the "avenger of blood," thereby preventing impulsive retaliation and upholding a fair, divinely ordained legal process within the nascent Israelite society.
Context
Literary Context
Numbers 35:14 is embedded within a significant legal and administrative section of the book of Numbers, immediately following the detailed instructions for the allocation of land among the Israelite tribes in Numbers 34. Chapter 35 itself commences with provisions for the Levites, who, unlike the other tribes, were not to receive a territorial inheritance but rather specific cities and pasturelands scattered throughout the tribal allotments, as detailed in Numbers 35:1-8. Within this framework, a distinct subset of these Levitical cities was uniquely designated as "cities of refuge" (Numbers 35:9-15). The verses directly preceding Numbers 35:14 (Numbers 35:9-13) articulate the primary purpose of these cities: to serve as a sanctuary for those who had accidentally killed someone, protecting them from the "avenger of blood" until they could stand trial before the community. Numbers 35:14, therefore, provides the practical, geographical implementation of this divinely ordained system, ensuring equitable access to justice across the entire Promised Land. The subsequent verses (Numbers 35:16-34) further elaborate on the legal distinctions between intentional murder and accidental homicide, and the procedures for trial and residence within the cities of refuge.
Historical & Cultural Context
In the ancient Near East, the concept of blood vengeance (known as go'el haddam or "avenger of blood" in Israelite law) was a deeply ingrained social custom. If a person was killed, it was the duty and right of the victim's closest male relative to avenge the death, often by killing the perpetrator. This system, while intended to maintain order, could easily spiral into destructive blood feuds, threatening communal stability. God's institution of cities of refuge in Israel served as a crucial modification and refinement of this custom, demonstrating a unique divine concern for due process and the distinction between premeditated murder and accidental death. The geographical distribution ("on this side Jordan" referring to the Transjordanian territories of Reuben, Gad, and half-Manasseh, while "in the land of Canaan" refers to the Cisjordanian territories) was vital given the physical landscape and the modes of travel. The Jordan River, while fordable at points, represented a significant geographical and sometimes political divide. Ensuring cities on both sides guaranteed accessibility for all Israelite tribes, reflecting a centralized, equitable legal system that transcended immediate tribal boundaries. This system was revolutionary in its provision of a legal framework for unintentional homicide, moving beyond simple retribution to a more nuanced concept of justice.
Key Themes
The establishment of the cities of refuge in Numbers 35 contributes significantly to several overarching themes within the book of Numbers and the wider Pentateuch. Firstly, it powerfully illustrates the theme of Divine Justice and Mercy. God, as the ultimate Lawgiver, demands accountability for the taking of human life, as seen in Numbers 35:30-31, yet He also provides a pathway for mercy and protection for those whose actions were unintentional, as stated in Numbers 35:15. This system carefully distinguishes between different degrees of culpability, reflecting God's nuanced understanding of human intent and His desire for a just society. Secondly, it reinforces the Sanctity of Human Life. The very existence of these cities, and the detailed laws surrounding them, underscore the immense value God places on human life. Even an accidental death required a formal legal process and a designated sanctuary, emphasizing the gravity of taking a life and the need for a righteous resolution, preventing the land from being defiled by innocent blood, as warned in Numbers 35:33-34. Thirdly, the precise geographical distribution of the cities (three on each side of the Jordan) highlights God's Providence and Order. This strategic placement ensures that refuge was readily accessible from any part of the land, demonstrating God's foresight and practical wisdom in establishing an orderly and just society where protection was available to all who legitimately needed it, reflecting His desire for a well-ordered community under His covenant. This theme is further explored in other passages detailing the land's distribution and the establishment of order, such as in Deuteronomy 4.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This primitive root verb (H5414) is used with remarkable latitude, encompassing actions like "to put," "to make," "to bestow," or "to assign." In the context of Numbers 35:14, "ye shall give" signifies a divine imperative and an act of formal assignment. It is not a suggestion but a command for the Israelites to actively designate and set apart these cities. This emphasizes the authoritative nature of the instruction and the responsibility placed upon the community to implement God's legal and social structure, highlighting the deliberate and intentional establishment of these vital sanctuaries.
Derived from a root meaning "to descend" (H3383), the Jordan River is the principal river of Palestine, serving as a significant geographical landmark. In this verse, "on this side Jordan" (H5676, ʻêber, meaning "across" or "beyond") specifically refers to the Transjordanian region, east of the river, which was already settled by certain Israelite tribes. Conversely, "in the land of Canaan" refers to the Cisjordanian region, west of the river. The explicit mention of the Jordan underscores the comprehensive and inclusive nature of God's provision for justice, ensuring that the system of refuge extended equally to all Israelite territories, regardless of their location relative to this prominent natural boundary.
This term (H4733), derived from the verb qalat meaning "to take in" or "to receive," specifically denotes an asylum or a designated place of sanctuary. It conveys the idea of a secure harbor or a legally sanctioned safe haven where one could find protection from immediate danger and the swift hand of vengeance. Unlike a mere hiding place, a miqlâṭ city was an officially established legal institution, emphasizing its role in providing due process and legal protection rather than simply facilitating escape. The term underscores the divine establishment of these cities as places of lawful asylum, integral to Israel's unique legal system.
Verse Breakdown
"Ye shall give three cities on this side Jordan"
This initial clause specifies the allocation of half of the divinely mandated cities of refuge. "This side Jordan" refers to the eastern bank of the Jordan River, encompassing the territories already settled by the tribes of Reuben, Gad, and the half-tribe of Manasseh. This directive demonstrates God's foresight in ensuring that immediate sanctuary would be available to the Israelite population even before the full conquest and settlement of the land of Canaan proper. It underscores the principle of accessibility, making refuge readily available to all Israelites regardless of their initial tribal allocation.
"and three cities shall ye give in the land of Canaan"
This second clause completes the geographical distribution, mandating the establishment of the remaining three cities of refuge on the western side of the Jordan River, within the heart of the Promised Land. The phrase "land of Canaan" denotes the primary inheritance for the majority of the Israelite tribes. This symmetrical distribution (three on each side) emphasizes the comprehensive and equitable nature of God's provision, ensuring that no Israelite, regardless of their location within the tribal territories, would be unduly distant from a designated city of refuge, thereby facilitating swift access to legal protection.
"[which] shall be cities of refuge"
This concluding phrase explicitly states the purpose and function of these six designated cities. They are not merely Levitical cities but are specifically set apart as places of "refuge" (Hebrew: miqlâṭ). This designation highlights their unique legal and social role as sanctuaries for those accused of unintentional homicide, providing a crucial mechanism for due process and protection from the "avenger of blood." It underscores the divine authority behind their establishment and their vital role in maintaining justice and order within the Israelite community, distinguishing accidental death from premeditated murder.
Literary Devices
Numbers 35:14, while primarily a legal directive, employs several subtle yet effective literary devices. The most prominent is Repetition and Parallelism, evident in the balanced structure of "three cities on this side Jordan, and three cities shall ye give in the land of Canaan." This symmetrical phrasing emphasizes the equitable and comprehensive nature of God's provision, ensuring accessibility across the entire breadth of the Israelite territory. The geographical distinction of "this side Jordan" and "in the land of Canaan" also functions as Merism, where two contrasting parts are mentioned to represent the whole, signifying that the cities of refuge are to be established throughout the entirety of the land where Israel would dwell. Furthermore, the verse functions as a Legal Edict within a broader legislative corpus, characterized by its prescriptive tone and direct command, reflecting the authoritative voice of God establishing foundational laws for His covenant people.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Numbers 35:14, by detailing the geographical distribution of the cities of refuge, powerfully reinforces the theological principle of God's universal and accessible provision for justice and mercy. These cities were not merely a human innovation but a divine institution, designed to uphold the sanctity of human life while offering a pathway for due process and protection for the unintentionally guilty. This system demonstrates God's meticulous care for His people, ensuring that His legal framework was not only righteous but also practical and equitable, preventing unchecked vengeance and promoting a society governed by divine statutes. The concept reflects God's character as both a righteous judge who demands accountability and a compassionate Father who provides sanctuary, demonstrating His desire for an ordered and just society.
Reflection and Application
The ancient institution of the cities of refuge, as detailed in Numbers 35:14, offers profound insights for contemporary reflection and application. It reveals a God who is deeply concerned with justice, yet equally committed to mercy. In a world often quick to condemn and slow to understand, these cities remind us of the divine imperative to distinguish between intentional malice and unintentional harm, advocating for due process and a fair hearing. For us today, this translates into a call to cultivate communities that offer grace and understanding, where individuals can find support and a path to restoration, rather than immediate condemnation, when they have caused harm, particularly if unintentional. It challenges us to build systems that protect the vulnerable and ensure equitable access to justice, mirroring God's own meticulous provision. Spiritually, it prompts us to consider where we run for refuge when we are overwhelmed by guilt, fear, or the consequences of our actions, pointing us to the ultimate sanctuary found in God's grace and redemptive plan.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What was the primary purpose of the cities of refuge?
The primary purpose of the cities of refuge was to provide a sanctuary and legal protection for individuals who had unintentionally caused the death of another person. In ancient Israel, a "blood avenger" (the victim's next of kin) had the right to pursue and kill the perpetrator. The cities of refuge served as a divinely ordained mechanism to prevent unchecked blood feuds and ensure that those accused of accidental homicide could receive a fair trial before the community elders. If found innocent of premeditated murder, the individual would reside in the city of refuge until the death of the current high priest, after which they could return to their home, as outlined in Numbers 35:25-28. This system balanced the sanctity of human life with the principle of mercy and due process.
Why were there six cities of refuge, three on each side of the Jordan?
The specific number and geographical distribution of the six cities of refuge (three east of the Jordan River and three west, in the land of Canaan) were designed to ensure maximum accessibility for all Israelites, regardless of their tribal territory. The Jordan River was a significant geographical barrier, and by placing cities on both sides, God ensured that anyone in the land could reach a city of refuge quickly to escape the immediate pursuit of the avenger of blood. This strategic placement reflects God's foresight and practical wisdom in establishing an equitable and effective system of justice and protection for His people, as later implemented in Joshua 20:7-8.
How did the cities of refuge distinguish between accidental death and murder?
The cities of refuge were central to distinguishing between accidental death and premeditated murder. Upon reaching a city of refuge, the individual would present their case to the elders at the city gate, as described in Joshua 20:4. They would then be protected from the avenger of blood until they could be brought before the full assembly of the community for trial, as stipulated in Numbers 35:12. During this trial, evidence would be presented, and witnesses heard. If it was determined that the killing was indeed unintentional—for example, without malice or intent, such as an axe head flying off and striking someone, as illustrated in Deuteronomy 19:5—the accused would remain in the city of refuge. However, if the killing was found to be premeditated murder, the perpetrator would be handed over to the avenger of blood for execution, as commanded in Numbers 35:30-31. This system provided a crucial legal framework for discerning intent and administering justice accordingly.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The cities of refuge, as commanded in Numbers 35:14, serve as a profound Old Testament type pointing to the ultimate refuge found in Jesus Christ. Just as these ancient cities provided a safe haven for the unintentionally guilty, protecting them from the avenger of blood and offering a path to due process, so too does Christ offer sanctuary from the just wrath of God against sin. We, as humanity, are all "guilty" in a spiritual sense, not always of intentional malice, but certainly of falling short of God's perfect standard, and the "avenger of blood" in this spiritual analogy is the righteous judgment of God against sin, as declared in Romans 3:23. However, through faith in Jesus, who is our compassionate and faithful High Priest, as described in Hebrews 4:14, we find a secure and eternal dwelling place, a sanctuary where we are protected from condemnation, as promised in Romans 8:1. He is the "hope set before us," to whom we can "flee for refuge," as exhorted in Hebrews 6:18. His atoning sacrifice on the cross, the shedding of His innocent blood, fully satisfies the demands of divine justice, allowing mercy to triumph without compromising righteousness. In Him, we are not merely temporarily protected until a high priest dies, but we receive eternal life and complete forgiveness, freely entering into God's presence with confidence through His blood, as articulated in Hebrews 10:19-22, finding our ultimate and permanent refuge in the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, as proclaimed in John 1:29.