TRV
“Parable of the Wicked Tenants”· Matthew 21:33–46
Translation
King James Version
And when the time of the fruit drew near, he sent his servants to the husbandmen, that they might receive the fruits of it.
Complete Jewish Bible
When harvest-time came, he sent his servants to the tenants to collect his share of the crop.
Berean Standard Bible
When the harvest time drew near, he sent his servants to the tenants to collect his share of the fruit.
American Standard Version
And when the season of the fruits drew near, he sent his servants to the husbandmen, to receive his fruits.
World English Bible Messianic
When the season for the fruit drew near, he sent his servants to the farmers, to receive his fruit.
Geneva Bible (1599)
And when the time of the fruite drewe neere, hee sent his seruants to the husbandmen to receiue the fruites thereof.
Young's Literal Translation
`And when the season of the fruits came nigh, he sent his servants unto the husbandmen, to receive the fruits of it,
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 23,861 of 31,102 · 76.7%
LawLawHistoryHistPoetryPoetProphetsProphNew TestamentNT
Study This Verse
Copy as
Historical interpretation
Ten Centuries of Reception
10 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Ante-NicenePost-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
2003004005006007008009001000110012001300
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
The householder is God, who in some parables is represented as a man. As it were a father condescending to the infant lisp of his little child, in order to instruct him.
Or, the hedge which God set round his people was His own Providence; and the winepress was the place of offerings.
Or, because God who had been with them in the cloud by day, and in the pillar of fire by night, (Exod. 13:21.) never after showed Himself to them in like manner. In Isaiah (Is. 5:7.) the people of the Jews is called the vineyard, and the threats of the householder are against the vineyard; but in the Gospel not the vineyard but the husbandmen are blamed. For perchance in the Gospel the vineyard is the kingdom of God, that is, the doctrine which is contained in holy Scripture; and a man's blameless life is the fruit of the vineyard. And the letter of Scripture is the hedge set round the vineyard, that the fruits which are hid in it should not be seen by those who are without. The depth of the oracles of God is the winepress of the vineyard, into which such as have profited in the oracles of God pour out their studies like fruit. The tower built therein is the word concerning God Himself, and concerning Christ's dispensations. This vineyard He committed to husbandmen, that is, to the people that was before us, both priests and laity, and went into a far country, by His departure giving opportunity to the husbandmen. The time of the vintage drawing near may be taken of individuals, and of nations. The first season of life is in infancy, when the vineyard has nought to show, but that it has in it the vital power. As soon as it comes to be able to speak, then is the time of putting forth buds. And as the child's soul progresses, so also does the vineyard, that is, the word of God; and after such progress the vineyard brings forth the ripe fruit of love, joy, peace, and the like. Moreover to the nation who received the Law by Moses, the time of fruit draweth near.
Or, He set forth the Prophets as it were winepresses, into which an abundant measure of the Holy Spirit, as of new wine, might flow in a teeming stream.
Or, The tower is the eminence of the Law, which ascended from earth to heaven, and from which, as from a watch-tower, the coming of Christ might be spied. And let it out to husbandmen.
These more than the first who were sent, denote that time, when, after the preaching of single Prophets, a great number was sent forth together.
By the Son sent at last, is denoted the advent of our Lord.
Christ was cast out of Jerusalem, as out of the vineyard, to His sentence of punishment.
He is become the head of the corner, because He is the union of both sides between the Law and the Gentiles.
Many things doth He intimate by this parable, God's providence, which had been exercised towards them from the first; their murderous disposition from the beginning; that nothing had been omitted of whatever pertained to a heedful care of them; that even when prophets had been slain, He had not turned away from them, but had sent His very Son; that the God both of the New and of the Old Testament was one and the same; that His death should effect great blessings; that they were to endure extreme punishment for the crucifixion, and their crime; the calling of the Gentiles, the casting out of the Jews.
Therefore He putteth it after the former parable, that He may show even hereby the charge to be greater, and highly unpardonable. How, and in what way? That although they met with so much care, they were worse than harlots and publicans, and by so much.
And observe also both His great care, and the excessive idleness of these men. For what pertained to the husbandmen, He Himself did, the hedging it round about, the planting the vineyard, and all the rest, and He left little for them to do; to take care of what was there, and to preserve what was given to them. For nothing was left undone, but all accomplished; and not even so did they gain, and this, when they had enjoyed such great blessings from Him. For when they had come forth out of Egypt, He gave a law, and set up a city, and built a temple, and prepared an altar.
"And went into a far country;" that He bore long with them, not always bringing the punishments close upon their sins; for by His going into a far country, He means His great long-suffering.
(Hom. lxviii.) The design of this further parable is to show that their guilt was heinous, and unworthy to be forgiven.
Or, it applies to His long-suffering, in that He did not always bring down immediate punishment on their sins.
(non occ. ap. Chrys.) He calls the Prophets servants, who as the Lord's Priests offer the fruits of the people, and the proofs of their obedience in their works. But they showed their wickedness not only in refusing the fruits, but in having indignation against those that come to them, as it follows, And the husbandmen took his servants, and beat one, and killed another, and stoned another.
Wherefore then did He not send Him immediately? That from what they had done to the others they might accuse themselves, and putting away their madness they might reverence His Son when He came.
Or He speaks as declaring what ought to be; they ought to reverence Him; thus showing that their sin was great, and void of all excuse.
Or there is no contradiction, because both are right; they first made answer in these words, and then the Lord repeated them.
Or otherwise: the Lord proposed this parable to them with this intent, that not understanding it they should give sentence against themselves; as was done by Nathan to David. Again, when they perceived the meaning of the things that had been said against them, they said, God forbid.
Christ is the stone, the builders are the Jewish teachers who rejected Christ, saying, This man is not of God. (John 9:16.)
And that they might know that nothing that had been done was against God's will, He adds, It is the Lord's doing.
Or, He here points out their twofold destruction; first in their stumbling and being offended at Him, signified in that, Whosoever shall fall upon this stone; the other in the captivity that should come upon them, signified by that, But upon whomsoever it shall fall.
He hath planted a vine of which Isaiah speaks, The vine of the Lord of Hosts is the house of Israel. (Isa. 5:7.) And hedged it round about; i. e. either the wall of the city, or the guardianship of Angels.
A winepress, that is to say, An altar; or those winepresses after which the three Psalms, the 8th, the 80th, and the 83d are entitleda, that is to say, the martyrs.
And built a tower therein, that is, the Temple, of which it is said by Micah, And thou, O cloudy tower of the daughter of Sion. (Mic. 4:8.)
Not a change of place, for God, by whom all things are filled, cannot be absent from any place; but He seems to be absent from the vineyard, that He may leave the vine-dressers a freedom of acting.
Beat them, as Jeremiah, killed them, as Isaiah, stoned them, as Naboth and Zacharias, whom they slew between the temple and the altar.
But when He says, They will reverence my Son, He does not speak as in ignorance. For what is there that this householder (by whom in this place God is intended) knows not? But God is thus spoken of as being uncertain, in order that free-will may be reserved for man.
Let us enquire of Arrius and Eunomius. See here the Father is said not to know somewhat. Whatever answer they make for the Father, let them understand the same of the Son, when He says that He knows not the day of the consummation of all things. (Mat. 22:36.)
The Lord asks them not as though He did not know what they would answer, but that they might be condemned by their own answer.
The same things are treated under various figures; whom above He called labourers and husbandmen, He now calls builders.
Whoso sinneth, yet believeth on Him, falls indeed upon a stone and is broken, yet is not altogether crushed, but is preserved to salvation through endurance. But on whomsoever it shall fall, that is, whomsoever this stone shall itself assault, and whosoever shall utterly deny Christ, it shall so crush him, that not a bone of him shall be left in which a drop of water could be taken up.
(Verse 34 and following) But when the time of the fruit drew near, he sent his servants to the vinedressers, that they might receive the fruits of it. And the vinedressers took his servants, and beat one, and killed another, and stoned another. Again, he sent other servants more than the first: and they did unto them likewise. And last of all he sent unto them his son, saying, They will reverence my son. But when the vinedressers saw the son, they said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance. And they caught him, and cast him out of the vineyard, and slew him. We read the letter of Paul to the Hebrews (Heb. XI) ; and from it we learn in great detail the sufferings endured by the servants of the Lord.
This He brings in because the Priests had asked not in order to learn, but to tempt Him. But of the common folk many had believed; and for that reason He brings forward the parable of the two sons, showing them therein that the common sort, who from the first professed secular lives, were better than the Priests who from the first professed the service of God, inasmuch as the people at length turned repentant to God, but the Priests impenitent, never left off to sin against God. And the elder son represents the people; because the people is not for the sake of the Priests, but the Priests are for the sake of the people.
He is called man, by title, not by nature; in a kind of likeness, not in verity. For the Son knowing that by occasion of His human name He himself should be blasphemed as though he were mere man, spoke therefore of the Invisible God the Father as man; He who by nature is Lord of Angels and men, but by goodness their Father.
Or, by the hedge understand the protection of the holy fathers, who were set as a wall round the people of Israel.
Or, the winepress is the word of God, which tortures man when it contradicts his fleshly nature.
When, that is, Priests and Levites were constituted by the Law, and undertook the direction of the people. And as an husbandman, though he offer to his Lord of his own stock, does not please him so much as by giving him the fruit of his own vineyard; so the Priest does not so much please God by his own righteousness, as by teaching the people of God holiness; for his own righteousness is but one, but that of the people manifold. And went into a far country.
At each step of their wickedness the mercy of God was increased, and at each step of the Divine mercy the wickedness of the Jews increased; thus there was a strife between human wickedness and Divine goodness.
He sent Him not as the bearer of a sentence of punishment against the guilty, but of an offer of repentance; He sent Him to put them to shame, not to punish them.
But some say, that it was after His incarnation, that Christ was called a Son in right of His baptism like the other saints, whom the Lord refutes by this place, saying, I will send my Son. Therefore when He thus meditated sending His Son after the Prophets, He must have been already His Son. Further, if He had been His Son in the same way as all the saints to whom the word of God was sent, He ought to have called the Prophets also His sons, as He calls Christ, or to call Christ His servant, as He calls the Prophets.
After His entry into the Temple, and having cast out those who sold the animals for the sacrifices, then they took counsel to kill Him, Come, let us kill him. For they reasoned among themselves, It will happen that the people hereby shall disuse the practice of sacrificing, which pertains to our gain, and shall be content to offer the sacrifice of righteousness, which pertains to the glory of God; and so the nation shall no more be our possession, but shall become God's. But if we shall kill Him, then there being none to seek the fruit of righteousness from the people, the practice of offering sacrifice shall continue, and so this people shall become our possession; as it follows, And the inheritance shall be ours. These are the usual thoughts of all worldly Priests, who take no thought how the people shall live without sin, but look to how much is offered in the Church, and esteem that the profit of their ministry.
That their answer is true, comes not of any righteous judgment in them, but from the case itself; truth constrained them.
Otherwise: Luke has given the answer of their lips, Matthew that of their hearts. For some made answer openly contradicting Him, and saying, God forbid, but their consciences took it up with He shall miserably destroy these wicked men. For so when a man is detected in any wickedness, he excuses himself in words, but his conscience within pleads guilty.
When they seemed discontent, He brings forward Scripture testimony; as much as to say, If ye understood not My parable, at least acknowledge this Scripture.
As much as to say, How do ye not understand in what building that stone is to be set, not in yours, seeing it is rejected, but in another; but if the building is to be other, your building will be rejected.
Christ is called A Stone, not only because of His strength, but because He mightily crushes His enemies; whence it follows, And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken, and on whomsoever it shall fall, it shall grind him to powder.
It is one thing to be broken, and another to be ground to powder. Of what is broken there remains something; but what is ground to powder is as it were converted into dust. And what falls upon a stone is not broken by any power of the stone, but because it fell heavily, either by reason of its weight, or of its fall from a great height. So a Christian in sinning, perishes, but not to the utmost that Christ can destroy; but only so far as he destroys himself, either by the greatness of his sin, or by his exalted rank. But the unbelievers perish to the utmost that Christ can destroy them.
The season of fruit, He says, not of rent-paying, because this stiff-necked nation brings forth no fruit.
Or, the first servants who were sent were the Lawgiver Moses himself, and Aaron the first Priest of God; whom, having beaten them with the scourge of their tongue, they sent away empty; by the other servants understand the company of the Prophets.
By what they say, This is the Son, He manifestly proves that the rulers of the Jews crucified the Son of God, not through ignorance, but through jealousy. For they understood that it was He to whom the Father speaks by the Prophet, Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance (Ps. 2:8.) The inheritance given to the Son is the holy Church; an inheritance not left Him by His Father when dying, but wonderfully purchased by His own death.
Or, The Jews endeavoured by putting Him to death to seize upon the inheritance, when they strove to overthrow the faith which is through Him, and to substitute their own righteousness which is by the Law, and therewith to imbue the Gentiles. It follows, And they caught him, and cast him out of the vineyard, and slew him.
Morally; a vineyard has been let out to each of us to dress, when the mystery of baptism was given us, to be cultivated by action. Servants one, two, and three are sent us when Law, Psalm, and Prophecy are read, after whose instructions we are to work well. He that is sent is beaten and cast out when the word is contemned, or, which is worse, is blasphemed. He kills (as far as in him lies) the heir, who tramples under foot the Son, and does despite to the Spirit of grace. The wicked husbandman is destroyed, and the vineyard is given to another, when the gift of grace which the proud has contemned is given to the lowly.
But despite of their displeasure, the same stone furnished the head stone of the corner, for out of both nations He has joined by faith in Him as many as He would.
The time of the fruit drew near during the years of the prophets. For the servants who were sent are the prophets who were abused in various ways by the husbandmen, that is, the false prophets and false teachers of those times. One they beat, as they did to Micah when Sedek struck him on the jaw [III Kings (I Kings) 22:24]; another they killed, as they did to Zechariah [the father of John the Forerunner] between the temple and the altar; another they stoned, as they did Zechariah, the son of Jodae the high priest [II Chron. 24:21]. Later the Son of God was sent and He appeared in the flesh. He said, They will reverence My Son, not unaware that they would kill Him, but signifying what ought to be. For, He says, they ought to honor the dignity of the Son even if they had killed the servants. But the husbandmen saw Him and said, This is the heir; come, let us kill Him. The Jews, too, said, "This is the Christ," and they crucified Him. They cast Him out of the vineyard, for the Lord was slain outside of the city. But since we would also say that the vineyard is the people, Christ was slain by the Pharisees, the evil husbandmen, outside the vineyard, that is, outside and apart from the will of the guileless people.
(ord.) Or, the Lord whom they killed, came immediately rising from the dead, and brought to an evil end those wicked husbandmen, and gave up His vineyard to other husbandmen, that is, to the Apostles.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying Matthew 21:34 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Matthew 21:34 is a pivotal verse within Jesus' Parable of the Wicked Vinedressers, an allegorical narrative delivered during His final week in Jerusalem. This verse marks the moment when the vineyard owner, after patiently cultivating his vineyard, sends his representatives to the tenant farmers to collect the expected harvest. It sets the stage for the escalating rebellion of the tenants, highlighting the owner's rightful expectation of fruit and their subsequent rejection of his authority, foreshadowing Israel's historical rejection of God's prophets and ultimately His Son.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is an integral part of the Parable of the Wicked Vinedressers, found in Matthew 21:33-46. Preceding this parable, Jesus had just entered Jerusalem triumphantly (Matthew 21:1-11) and cleansed the Temple (Matthew 21:12-17), directly challenging the religious authorities. The chief priests and elders then questioned His authority (Matthew 21:23), prompting Jesus to respond with a series of parables—the Parable of the Two Sons (Matthew 21:28-32) and this parable of the vinedressers—which directly indict their unfaithfulness and impending judgment. Verse 34 specifically details the owner's initial attempt to collect his due, setting the stage for the tenants' escalating violence against his messengers, culminating in the murder of his son.
Historical & Cultural Context
The imagery of a vineyard was deeply resonant in ancient Israel, often symbolizing the nation itself, as seen powerfully in Isaiah 5:1-7. Vineyard tenancy was a common economic practice in the Roman world, where landowners would lease their cultivated land to tenant farmers in exchange for a share of the produce. The owner's meticulous preparation of the vineyard (planting, fencing, digging a winepress, building a tower, as described in Matthew 21:33) reflects the significant investment and care required. The "time of the fruit" refers to the expected harvest season, a period when the owner would rightfully anticipate receiving his share, which was a legally and culturally recognized obligation of the tenants. The sending of servants was a standard practice for collecting these dues, and their treatment would reflect the tenants' respect or disrespect for the owner's authority.
Key Themes
This verse contributes to several overarching themes within Matthew's Gospel and broader biblical theology. Firstly, it underscores Divine Expectation and Patience, illustrating God's patient waiting for His people, Israel, to produce the spiritual "fruit" of righteousness and obedience, a theme echoed in the prophetic tradition (e.g., Hosea 10:1). Secondly, it highlights God's Persistent Messengers, as the "servants" symbolize the long line of prophets God sent throughout Israel's history, calling the nation to repentance and accountability, a pattern frequently recounted in the Old Testament (e.g., 2 Chronicles 36:15-16). Finally, the verse introduces the theme of Accountability for Stewardship, as the "husbandmen" were entrusted with a valuable resource and were expected to manage it for the owner's benefit, reflecting the broader biblical principle that all of creation and life itself are a trust from God for which humanity is accountable (Genesis 1:28).
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This word signifies "an occasion, i.e. set or proper time." Unlike chronos (linear time), kairos denotes a specific, opportune, or appointed moment. In this context, it emphasizes that the harvest was not just any time, but the appointed season when fruit was due, highlighting the owner's legitimate expectation and the tenants' subsequent failure to meet their covenant obligations at the proper moment.
Meaning "a slave (literal or figurative, involuntary or voluntary; frequently, therefore in a qualified sense of subjection or subserviency)." Here, "servants" are bond-servants, implying absolute loyalty and obedience to the owner. In the parable's allegory, these represent the prophets whom God sent to Israel, acting as His direct messengers and representatives, fully subject to His will.
Meaning "a land-worker, i.e. farmer." This term precisely identifies the tenants as those entrusted with the cultivation and care of the vineyard. Their role was to work the land and produce fruit, sharing a portion with the owner. Allegorically, these are the religious leaders and, by extension, the nation of Israel, entrusted with God's vineyard (His covenant people) and expected to bear spiritual fruit.
Verse Breakdown
"And when the time of the fruit drew near"
This clause establishes the critical juncture in the parable. The "time of the fruit" signifies the harvest season, the expected period for the vineyard to yield its produce. Allegorically, this represents the culmination of God's patient work with Israel, reaching a point where He rightfully anticipated a spiritual harvest of righteousness, obedience, and faithfulness from His chosen people. The phrase "drew near" (G1448, engízō) emphasizes the imminence and inevitability of this divinely appointed season of accountability.
"he sent his servants to the husbandmen"
This action by the owner is a direct exercise of his rightful authority and a demonstration of his patience. He sends his trusted representatives to collect what is due. In the allegorical sense, this vividly portrays God's consistent and persistent sending of His prophets throughout Israel's history. These prophets, like the servants, were sent to call the nation to repentance, to remind them of their covenant obligations, and to claim the spiritual "fruits" that God expected from His vineyard.
"that they might receive the fruits of it."
This final clause states the clear purpose of the servants' mission: to obtain the rightful share of the harvest. The "fruits" (G2590, karpós) here are not merely literal grapes but symbolize the spiritual outcomes—righteousness, justice, obedience, and faithfulness—that God expected from His people. This highlights the principle of divine expectation and the accountability of those entrusted with God's blessings and resources. The owner's desire was not to oppress but to receive what was rightfully his, a just return on his significant investment.
Literary Devices
The Parable of the Wicked Vinedressers is a masterful Allegory, where each element consistently represents a distinct reality. In Matthew 21:34, the "owner" symbolizes God, the "vineyard" represents Israel (or God's kingdom entrusted to Israel), the "husbandmen" are the religious leaders of Israel (and by extension, the nation itself), and the "servants" are God's prophets. The "fruits" symbolize the spiritual righteousness and obedience God expected. This verse also employs Symbolism, using the agricultural setting to convey profound theological truths about God's relationship with His people and their stewardship. The "time of the fruit" is symbolic of a divinely appointed season of accountability and judgment. Furthermore, the sending of the servants and the expectation of fruit serve as Foreshadowing of the coming rejection of God's ultimate messenger, His Son, which is detailed later in the parable. The initial, relatively peaceful request for fruit sets up the dramatic escalation of violence that follows, building narrative tension and prophetic significance.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Matthew 21:34 powerfully encapsulates God's consistent engagement with His people and His unwavering expectation of a spiritual return on His divine investment. The owner's sending of servants to collect fruit reflects God's patient yet persistent pursuit of a righteous response from Israel, a nation He had meticulously cultivated and blessed. This act underscores the covenantal relationship, where divine provision necessitates human responsibility and accountability. The "fruits" represent not merely ritualistic observance but a life transformed by obedience, justice, and love, reflecting the character of God. The verse highlights the long history of God's prophetic witness, where messengers were sent repeatedly to call His people back to faithfulness, setting the stage for the tragic rejection that would ultimately lead to the sending of His Son.
Reflection and Application
This verse serves as a profound reminder that God, our divine "landowner," has invested immeasurably in each of us. He has given us life, breath, talents, resources, His Word, and the indwelling Holy Spirit. Just as the vineyard owner expected fruit from his tenants, God expects spiritual fruit from our lives—not as a means to earn salvation, but as the natural outflow of a genuine relationship with Him. This "fruit" encompasses the character of Christ (the fruit of the Spirit) and good works that glorify Him (Ephesians 2:10). The sending of servants, representing God's persistent calls through His Word, His Spirit, and His people, challenges us to examine our responsiveness. Are we like the wicked husbandmen, resisting God's rightful claims and rejecting His messengers, or are we cultivating the "vineyard" of our lives to yield a bountiful harvest for His glory? Our stewardship of what God has entrusted to us has eternal implications, and this verse calls us to a life of faithful productivity and humble submission to His will.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Who do the "servants" and "husbandmen" represent in this parable?
In the allegorical interpretation of this parable, the "servants" represent the long line of prophets God sent to Israel throughout its history. These prophets, from Moses to John the Baptist, were God's messengers, calling His people to repentance, reminding them of their covenant obligations, and seeking the "fruit" of righteousness and obedience. The "husbandmen" (or vinedressers) represent the religious leaders of Israel, particularly those in Jesus' day, and by extension, the nation of Israel itself. They were entrusted with God's "vineyard"—His chosen people and the covenant—and were expected to cultivate it and produce spiritual fruit for Him. Their repeated mistreatment and murder of the servants symbolize Israel's historical rejection and persecution of God's prophets, as lamented by Jesus in Matthew 23:37.
What is the significance of "the time of the fruit drew near"?
This phrase signifies the appointed season for harvest, which in the parable's allegory represents a divinely appointed time of accountability and expectation. For Israel, it refers to the culmination of God's patient work with them and His rightful expectation of spiritual fruit—lives lived in obedience and faithfulness to His covenant. The "drawing near" suggests that God's patience, while immense, is not infinite. It points to a critical juncture where a return on His investment is due. In Jesus' immediate context, it foreshadows His own coming as the ultimate "Son" and the final opportunity for Israel to respond, before judgment would inevitably fall upon those who rejected God's persistent calls, as seen in the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. This concept of a "set time" for judgment or reckoning is common in biblical prophecy, such as in Daniel 8:19.
What kind of "fruits" is the owner expecting in this parable?
While literally referring to grapes, the "fruits" in this parable are symbolic of spiritual outcomes. In the context of Israel, God expected the "fruit" of righteousness, justice, obedience to His laws, and a heart of faithfulness. This is consistent with Old Testament prophetic calls for Israel to bear "fruit" of righteousness, as seen in Hosea 10:12. For believers today, the "fruits" God expects are multi-faceted: the fruit of the Spirit (love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control), good works that glorify God (Titus 2:14), and the fruit of evangelism and discipleship (John 15:16). It is about living a life that reflects God's character and purpose, demonstrating a genuine relationship with Him.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Matthew 21:34, with its depiction of the owner sending servants to collect fruit, finds its profound Christ-centered fulfillment in the person and mission of Jesus Himself. The "time of the fruit" drawing near culminates with the arrival of the ultimate "Son" (as described in Matthew 21:37), Jesus Christ. He is God's final and most authoritative messenger, sent not merely to collect fruit, but to embody and enable true fruit-bearing. The parable's tragic narrative of the husbandmen rejecting and murdering the servants, and ultimately the son, powerfully foreshadows Israel's rejection and crucifixion of Jesus, the very cornerstone God had laid (Matthew 21:42). Through His death and resurrection, Jesus became the true "vine" (John 15:1), enabling those who abide in Him to bear abundant and lasting spiritual fruit, something the old covenant system struggled to produce. His coming marked the ultimate call for a spiritual harvest, and His sacrifice made it possible for humanity to finally yield the righteousness God desires, fulfilling the divine expectation that had been unmet by the unfaithful "husbandmen" of old. The kingdom of God, therefore, was taken from those who failed to bear fruit and given to a people (the Church) who would produce it (Matthew 21:43).