Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
But he answered and said, Every plant, which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
But G1161 he answered G611 and said G2036, Every G3956 plant G5451, which G3739 my G3450 heavenly G3770 Father G3962 hath G5452 not G3756 planted G5452, shall be rooted up G1610.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
He replied, "Every plant that my Father in heaven has not planted will be pulled up by the roots.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
But Jesus replied, “Every plant that My heavenly Father has not planted will be pulled up by its roots.
Ask
American Standard Version
But he answered and said, Every plant which my heavenly Father planted not, shall be rooted up.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
But he answered, ‹“Every plant which my heavenly Father didn’t plant will be uprooted.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
But hee answered and saide, Euery plant which mine heauenly Father hath not planted, shalbe rooted vp.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And he answering said, `Every plant that my heavenly Father did not plant shall be rooted up;
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Matthew Sites (Jerusalem)
All Matthew Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
Matthew 15:1-19
Matthew 15:1-19 View full PDF
All Matthew Sites (Eastern Mediterranean)
All Matthew Sites (Eastern Mediterranean) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 23,647 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Matthew 15:13 presents Jesus' profound and unequivocal declaration concerning the ultimate fate of all that lacks divine origin. In direct response to the disciples' observation that the Pharisees were offended by His teachings, Jesus asserts that any doctrine, system, or practice not established by His heavenly Father is destined for complete removal. This statement underscores the absolute supremacy of God's truth over human tradition and serves as a powerful pronouncement of divine judgment against all spiritual counterfeits.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is Jesus' direct and authoritative response to His disciples' concern, expressed in Matthew 15:12, that the Pharisees were offended by His teaching. The preceding narrative in Matthew 15:1-9 details a confrontation where Pharisees and scribes from Jerusalem challenge Jesus and His disciples for violating their tradition of ceremonial hand-washing before eating. Jesus deftly turns the accusation back on them, exposing how their human traditions, particularly the Corban vow, effectively nullified God's commandments (Matthew 15:6). He then teaches the crowds and His disciples that true defilement comes not from external practices but from the evil thoughts and intentions of the heart (Matthew 15:10-11). Thus, Matthew 15:13 dismisses the Pharisees' offense as inconsequential, asserting that their entire system, being of human origin, is ultimately doomed.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The Pharisees were a prominent and influential Jewish religious sect during the Second Temple period, known for their meticulous adherence to the Mosaic Law and, crucially, to an extensive body of oral traditions. These oral laws, which they believed were divinely revealed alongside the written Torah, governed nearly every aspect of life, including purity rituals, dietary practices, and Sabbath observance. They often added layers of human interpretation and regulation to God's written law. The Pharisees derived their authority from their perceived piety and meticulous observance of these traditions, which they believed distinguished them as truly righteous. Jesus' ministry continually challenged their legalism, hypocrisy, and their elevation of human tradition above divine command, leading to frequent clashes that highlighted a fundamental tension between His gospel of grace and their system of works.
  • Key Themes: The central theme in this passage, and particularly in Matthew 15:13, is the profound contrast between divine authority and human tradition. Jesus implicitly critiques the Pharisees' system, which, though appearing religious, was fundamentally a "plant" not sown by God. This highlights the theme of true versus false righteousness, emphasizing that external adherence to man-made rules is spiritually bankrupt if it does not flow from a heart transformed by God's truth. Furthermore, the verse introduces the theme of divine judgment, asserting that anything not originating from God will ultimately be "rooted up," signifying its complete and irreversible removal. This echoes broader biblical warnings against false teachings and those who lead others astray, underscoring the necessity of discerning what is truly from God, a theme woven throughout Matthew's Gospel.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • plant (Greek, phyteía', G5451): From φυτεύω, this term refers to something transplanted, or concretely, a shrub or vegetable. In this context, it is used metaphorically to represent a doctrine, a religious system, a tradition, or even individuals who are part of such a framework. The imagery evokes something that grows and is established, but its ultimate fate depends entirely on its origin.
  • planted (Greek, phyteúō', G5452): Derived from φύω, meaning "to set out in the earth" or "to implant." Figuratively, it means "to instil doctrine." Here, it signifies divine establishment or initiation. The passive voice ("hath not planted") emphasizes that the action of planting, or the lack thereof, comes from an external, superior agent—God Himself, the ultimate gardener.
  • rooted up (Greek, ekrizóō', G1610): Formed from ἐκ ("out of") and ῥιζόω ("to root"), this verb means "to uproot" or "to pluck up by the root." It conveys a complete, irreversible, and forceful removal, destruction, or dismantling. The passive voice ("shall be rooted up") again points to a divine agent of judgment, indicating that the eradication is not by human hands but by God's ultimate decree and power.

Verse Breakdown

  • "But he answered and said,": This phrase introduces Jesus' direct and authoritative response to the disciples' observation about the Pharisees' offense. It signals a pronouncement of significant theological weight, not merely a casual remark, setting the stage for a profound spiritual truth.
  • "Every plant,": This is the subject of Jesus' declaration, presented metaphorically. The word "Every" (Greek pâs) emphasizes the universal scope of this principle, indicating that there are no exceptions. "Plant" (Greek phyteía) symbolizes any doctrine, tradition, religious system, or even individuals within such a system.
  • "which my heavenly Father hath not planted,": This crucial clause provides the criterion for judgment. The "heavenly Father" (Greek ouránios Patḗr) explicitly identifies God as the ultimate authority and originator of all that is true and enduring. Anything that does not have its origin in Him, anything not divinely established or sanctioned, falls under this category, directly contrasting with the Pharisees' human-made traditions.
  • "shall be rooted up.": This is the inevitable and certain outcome for anything not planted by God. The passive voice ("shall be rooted up") implies divine action in the "rooting up," signifying a complete and irreversible destruction or removal. It is a declaration of ultimate judgment and dismantling, indicating that such "plants" lack true life, divine sustenance, and therefore cannot endure God's scrutiny.

Literary Devices

Matthew 15:13 is rich in Metaphor, primarily through the extended imagery of the "plant" and "rooting up." The "plant" serves as a powerful symbol for any doctrine, tradition, or religious system, particularly those of the Pharisees, that lacks divine origin. The act of "planting" represents divine establishment and sustenance, while "rooting up" signifies God's judgment and complete destruction or removal of that which is not of Him. This agricultural imagery makes the abstract concept of divine judgment tangible and easily understandable. The verse also employs Antithesis, sharply contrasting what "my heavenly Father hath planted" with what He "hath not planted." This stark opposition highlights the fundamental dichotomy between divine truth and human error, underscoring the absolute necessity of divine origin for anything to possess true spiritual validity and eternal endurance.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Matthew 15:13 powerfully articulates the principle of divine sovereignty over all truth and practice, asserting that only what originates from God will ultimately endure. It challenges the human tendency to elevate tradition, personal interpretation, or cultural norms above God's revealed will, exposing the futility of religious systems built on human ingenuity rather than divine foundation. This verse underscores the critical importance of discerning the source of spiritual authority and truth, reminding believers that genuine faith must be rooted in God's Word and His Spirit, not in the shifting sands of human wisdom or ritual. The "rooting up" signifies God's ultimate judgment against all falsehood and spiritual counterfeit, assuring that His kingdom and His truth will prevail.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Matthew 15:13 calls believers to a profound level of discernment and unwavering commitment to divine truth. In a world saturated with diverse spiritual claims, traditions, and philosophies, this verse serves as a crucial filter: Is what I believe, practice, or follow truly planted by my heavenly Father? It compels us to critically examine the foundations of our faith, the traditions of our churches, and even our personal habits and convictions, asking if they align with God's revealed will or if they are merely human constructs, however well-intentioned or deeply ingrained. This means prioritizing the diligent study of God's Word, seeking the Holy Spirit's guidance in all matters, and being willing to courageously abandon anything—no matter how comfortable, familiar, or socially accepted—that lacks divine origin. Ultimately, living by this principle fosters genuine spiritual vitality, ensuring that our lives are built on an unshakeable foundation that will endure God's ultimate scrutiny and judgment.

Questions for Reflection

  • What "plants" (beliefs, practices, or traditions) in my personal life or my faith community might not have been planted by God, and how can I discern their true origin?
  • How can I cultivate a deeper reliance on God's Word and the Holy Spirit to discern between divine truth and human tradition?
  • What practical steps can I take to ensure that my spiritual foundation is solely rooted in the heavenly Father's planting, rather than in transient human constructs?

FAQ

What does Jesus mean by "every plant"?

Answer: In Matthew 15:13, "every plant" is a metaphor used by Jesus to refer broadly to any doctrine, teaching, religious system, or even individuals who adhere to such systems, that do not originate from God. In the immediate context, it primarily refers to the human traditions and legalistic interpretations of the Pharisees, which Jesus had just exposed as nullifying God's commandments (Matthew 15:6). The imagery suggests something that has grown and become established, but whose legitimacy and ultimate survival depend entirely on whether God Himself initiated it.

Does this verse imply that all human traditions are bad?

Answer: Not necessarily all human traditions, but specifically those that compete with, contradict, or nullify God's divine commands and truth. Jesus' teaching here is a direct critique of traditions that elevate human authority above God's, as exemplified by the Pharisees' practices. The key is the origin: if a tradition or teaching is not "planted" by God—meaning it does not align with His character, His Word, or His will—then it is ultimately destined for removal. Traditions that serve to uphold or illuminate God's truth, or are simply cultural expressions that do not violate biblical principles, are not the target of this warning. The warning is against anything that usurps God's unique authority or leads people away from genuine obedience to Him (Mark 7:8-9).

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Matthew 15:13, while a warning against human tradition, finds its ultimate Christ-centered fulfillment in Jesus' own identity as the perfectly "planted" Son of God and the embodiment of divine truth. Jesus Himself is the "true vine" (John 15:1), the one truly planted by the Heavenly Father, through whom all genuine spiritual life flows. His teachings, unlike the traditions of the Pharisees, are not human inventions but the very words of God (John 12:49-50). Therefore, any system, philosophy, or teaching that does not align with Christ, His person, or His gospel is fundamentally flawed and destined to be "rooted up." The ultimate "rooting up" will occur at the final judgment, when every false teaching, every humanistic philosophy, and every kingdom not established by God will be utterly dismantled, and only the eternal kingdom of Christ will remain (Revelation 11:15). Thus, this verse implicitly calls us to be rooted in Christ alone (Colossians 2:6-7), for He is the only "plant" that will eternally endure and provide true life.

Copy as

Commentary on Matthew 15 verses 10–20

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

Christ having proved that the disciples, in eating with unwashen hands, were not to be blamed, as transgressing the traditions and injunctions of the elders, comes here to show that they were not to be blamed, as having done any thing that was in itself evil. In the former part of his discourse he overturned the authority of the law, and in this the reason of it. Observe,

I. The solemn introduction to this discourse (Mat 15:10); He called the multitude. They were withdrawn while Christ discoursed with the scribes and Pharisees; probably those proud men ordered them to withdraw, as not willing to talk with Christ in their hearing; Christ must favour them at their pleasure with a discourse in private. But Christ had a regard to the multitude; he soon despatched the scribes and Pharisees, and then turned them off, invited the mob, the multitude, to be his hearers: thus the poor are evangelized; and the foolish things of the world, and things that are despised hath Christ chosen. The humble Jesus embraced those whom the proud Pharisees looked upon with disdain, and to them he designed it for a mortification. He turns from them as wilful and unteachable, and turns to the multitude, who, though weak, were humble, and willing to be taught. To them he said, Hear and understand. Note, What we hear from the mouth of Christ, we must give all diligence to understand. Not only scholars, but even the multitude, the ordinary people, must apply their minds to understand the words of Christ. He therefore calls upon them to understand, because the lesson he was now about to teach them, was contrary to the notions which they had sucked in with their milk from their teachers; and overturned many of the customs and usages which they were wedded to, and laid stress upon. Note, There is need of a great attention of mind and clearness of understanding to free men from those corrupt principles and practices which they have been bred up in and long accustomed to; for in that case the understanding is commonly bribed and biassed by prejudice.

II. The truth itself laid down (Mat 15:11), in two propositions, which were opposite to the vulgar errors of that time, and were therefore surprising.

1.Not that which goes into the mouth defileth the man. It is not the kind or quality of our food, nor the condition of our hands, that affects the soul with any moral pollution or defilement. The kingdom of God is not meat and drink, Rom 14:17. That defiles the man, by which guilt is contracted before God, and the man is rendered offensive to him, and disfitted for communion with him; now what we eat, if we do not eat unreasonably and immoderately, does not this; for to the pure all things are pure, Tit 1:15. The Pharisees carried the ceremonial pollutions, by eating such and such meats, much further than the law intended, and burdened it with additions of their own, which our Saviour witnesses against; intending hereby to pave the way to a repeal of the ceremonial law in that matter. He was now beginning to teach his followers to call nothing common or unclean; and if Peter, when he was bid to kill and eat, had remembered this word, he would not have said, Not so, Lord, Act 10:13-15, Act 10:28.

2.But that which comes out of the mouth, this defiles a man. We are polluted, not by the meat we eat with unwashen hands, but by the words we speak from an unsanctified heart; thus it is that the mouth causeth the flesh to sin, Ecc 5:6. Christ, in a former discourse, had laid a great stress upon our words (Mat 12:36, Mat 12:37); and that was intended for reproof and warning to those that cavilled at him; this here is intended for reproof and warning to those that cavilled at the disciples, and censured them. It is not the disciples that defile themselves with what they eat, but the Pharisees that defile themselves with what they speak spitefully and censoriously of them. Note, Those who charge guilt upon others for transgressing the commandments of men, many times bring greater guilt upon themselves, by transgressing the law of God against rash judging. Those most defile themselves, who are most forward to censure the defilements of others.

III. The offence that was taken at this truth and the account brought to Christ of that offence (Mat 15:12); "The disciples said unto him, Knowest thou that the Pharisees were offended, and didst thou not foresee that they would be so, at this saying, and would think the worse of thee and of thy doctrine for it, and be the more enraged at thee?"

1.It was not strange that the Pharisees should be offended at this plain truth, for they were men made up of error and enmity, mistakes and malice. Sore eyes cannot bear clear light; and nothing is more provoking to proud imposers than the undeceiving of those whom they have first blindfolded, and then enslaved. It should seem that the Pharisees, who were strict observers of the traditions, were more offended than the scribes, who were the teachers of them; and perhaps they were as much galled with the latter part of Christ's doctrine, which taught a strictness in the government of our tongue, as with the former part, which taught an indifference about washing our hands; great contenders for the formalities of religion, being commonly as great contemners of the substantials of it.

2.The disciples thought it strange that their Master should say that which he knew would give so much offence; he did not use to do so: surely, they think, if he had considered how provoking it would be, he would not have said it. But he knew what he said, and to whom he said it, and what would be the effect of it; and would teach us, that though in indifferent things we must be tender of giving offence, yet we must not, for fear of that, evade any truth or duty. Truth must be owned, and duty done; and if any be offended, it is his own fault; it is scandal, not given, but taken.

Perhaps the disciples themselves stumbled at the word Christ said, which they thought bold, and scarcely reconcileable with the difference that was put by the law of God between clean and unclean meats; and therefore objected this to Christ, that they might themselves be better informed. They seem likewise to have a concern upon them for the Pharisees, though they had quarrelled with them; which teaches us to forgive, and seek the good, especially the spiritual good, of our enemies, persecutors, and slanderers. They would not have the Pharisees go away displeased at any thing Christ had said; and therefore, though they do not desire him to retract it, they hope he will explain, correct, and modify it. Weak hearers are sometimes more solicitous than they should be not to have wicked hearers offended. But if we please men with the concealment of truth, and the indulgence of their errors and corruptions, we are not the servants of Christ.

IV. The doom passed upon the Pharisees and their corrupt traditions; which comes in as a reason why Christ cared not though he offended them, and therefore why the disciples should not care; because they were a generation of men that hated to be reformed, and were marked out for destruction. Two things Christ here foretels concerning them.

1.The rooting out of them and their traditions (Mat 15:13); Every plant which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up. Not only the corrupt opinions and superstitious practices of the Pharisees, but their sect, and way, and constitution, were plants not of God's planting. The rules of their profession were no institutions of his, but owed their origin to pride and formality. The people of the Jews were planted a noble vine; but now that they are become the degenerate plant of a strange vine, God disowned them, as not of his planting. Note, (1.) In the visible church, it is no strange thing to find plants that our heavenly Father has not planted. It is implied, that whatever is good in the church is of God's planting, Isa 41:19. But let the husbandman be ever so careful, his ground will cast forth weeds of itself, more or less, and there is an enemy busy sowing tares. What is corrupt, though of God's permitting, is not of his planting; he sows nothing but good seed in his field. Let us not therefore be deceived, as if all must needs be right that we find in the church, and all those persons and things our Father's plants that we find in our Father's garden. Believe not every spirit, but try the spirits; see Jer 19:5; Jer 23:31, Jer 23:32. (2.) Those that are of the spirit of the Pharisees, proud, formal, and imposing, what figure soever they make, and of what denomination soever they be, God will not own them as of his planting. By their fruit you shall know them. (3.) Those plants that are not of God's planting, shall not be of his protecting, but shall undoubtedly be rooted up. What is not of God shall not stand, Act 5:38. What things are unscriptural, will wither and die of themselves, or be justly exploded by the churches; however in the great day these tares that offend will be bundled for the fire. What is become of the Pharisees and their traditions? They are long since abandoned; but the gospel of truth is great, and will remain. It cannot be rooted up.

2.The ruin of them; and their followers, who had their persons and principles in admiration, Mat 15:14. Where,

(1.)Christ bids his disciples let them alone. "Have no converse with them or concern for them; neither court their favour, nor dread their displeasure; care not though they be offended, they will take their course, and let them take the issue of it. They are wedded to their own fancies, and will have every thing their own way; let them alone. Seek not to please a generation of men that please not God (Th1 2:15), and will be pleased with nothing less than absolute dominion over your consciences. They are joined to idols, as Ephraim (Hos 4:17), the idols of their own fancy; let them alone, let them be filthy still," Rev 22:11. The case of those sinners is sad indeed, whom Christ orders his ministers to let alone.

(2.)He gives them two reasons for it. Let them alone; for,

[1.]They are proud and ignorant; two bad qualities that often meet, and render a man incurable in his folly, Pro 26:12. They are blind leaders of the blind. They are grossly ignorant in the things of God, and strangers to the spiritual nature of the divine law; and yet so proud, that they think they see better and further than any, and therefore undertake to be leaders of others, to show others the way to heaven, when they themselves know not one step of the way; and, accordingly, they prescribe to all, and proscribe those who will not follow them. Though they were blind, if they had owned it, and come to Christ for eye-salve, they might have seen, but they disdained the intimation of such a thing (Joh 9:40); Are we blind also? They were confident that they themselves were guides of the blind (Rom 2:19, Rom 2:20), were appointed to be so, and fit to be so; that every thing they said was an oracle and a law; "Therefore let them alone, their case is desperate; do not meddle with them; you may soon provoke them, but never convince them." How miserable was the case of the Jewish Church now when their leaders were blind, so self-conceitedly foolish, as to be peremptory in their conduct, while the people were so sottishly foolish as to follow them with an implicit faith and obedience, and willingly walk after the commandment, Hos 5:11. Now the prophecy was fulfilled, Isa 29:10, Isa 29:14. And it is easy to imagine what will be in the end hereof, when the prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means, and the people love to have it so, Jer 5:31.

[2.]They are posting to destruction, and will shortly be plunged into it; Both shall fall into the ditch. This must needs be the end of it, if both be so blind, and yet both so bold, venturing forward, and yet not aware of danger. Both will be involved in the general desolation coming upon the Jews, and both drowned in eternal destruction and perdition. The blind leaders and the blind followers will perish together. We find (Rev 22:15), that hell is the portion of those that make a lie, and of those that love it when it is made. The deceived and the deceiver are obnoxious to the judgment of God, Job 12:16. Note, First, Those that by their cunning craftiness draw others to sin and error, shall not, with all their craft and cunning, escape ruin themselves. If both fall together into the ditch, the blind leaders will fall undermost, and have the worst of it; see Jer 14:15, Jer 14:16. The prophets shall be consumed first, and then the people to whom they prophesy, Jer 20:6; Jer 27:15, Jer 27:16. Secondly, The sin and ruin of the deceivers will be no security to those that are deceived by them. Though the leaders of this people cause them to err, yet they that are led of them are destroyed (Isa 9:16), because they shut their eyes against the light which would have rectified their mistake. Seneca, complaining of most people's being led by common opinion and practice (Unusquisque mavult credere quam judicare - Things are taken upon trust, and never examined), concludes, Indeista tanta coacervatio aliorum super alios ruentium - Hence crowds fall upon crowds, in vast confusion. De Vit Beat. The falling of both together will aggravate the fall of both; for they that have thus mutually increased each other's sin, will mutually exasperate each other's ruin.

V. Instruction given to the disciples concerning the truth Christ had laid down, Mat 15:10. Though Christ rejects the wilfully ignorant who care not to be taught, he can have compassion on the ignorant who are willing to learn, Heb 5:2. If the Pharisees, who made void the law, be offended, let them be offended: but this great peace have they who love the law, that nothing shall offend them, but, some way or other, the offence shall be taken off, Psa 119:165.

Here is, 1. Their desire to be better instructed in this matter (Mat 15:15); in this request as in many others, Peter was their speaker; the rest, it is probable, putting him on to speak, or intimating their concurrence; Declare unto us this parable. What Christ said was plain, but, because it agreed not with the notions they had imbibed, though they would not contradict it, yet they call it a parable, and cannot understand it. Note, (1.) Weak understandings are apt to turn plain truths into parables, and to seek for a knot in a bulrush. The disciples often did so, as Joh 16:17. Even the grasshopper is a burthen to a weak stomach, and babes in understanding cannot bear and digest strong meat. (2.) Where a weak head doubts concerning any word of Christ, an upright heart and a willing mind will seek for instruction. The Pharisees were offended, but kept it to themselves; hating to be reformed, they hated to be informed; but the disciples, though offended, sought for satisfaction, imputing the offence, not to the doctrine delivered, but to the shallowness of their own capacity.

2.The reproof Christ gave them for their weakness and ignorance (Mat 15:16); Are ye also yet without understanding? As many as Christ loves and teaches, he thus rebukes. Note, They are very ignorant indeed, who understand not that moral pollutions are abundantly worse and more dangerous than ceremonial ones. Two things aggravate their dulness and darkness.

(1.)That they were the disciples of Christ; "Are ye also without understanding? Ye whom I have admitted into so great a degree of familiarity with me, are ye so unskilful in the word of righteousness?" Note, The ignorance and mistakes of those that profess religion, and enjoy the privileges of church-membership, are justly a grief to the Lord Jesus. "No wonder that the Pharisees understand not this doctrine, who know nothing of the Messiah's kingdom: but ye that have heard of it, and embraced it yourselves, and preached it to others, are ye also such strangers to the spirit and genius of it?"

(2.)That they had been a great while Christ's scholars; "Are ye yet so, after ye have been so long under my teaching?" Had they been but of yesterday in Christ's school, it had been another matter, but to have been for so many months Christ's constant hearers, and yet to be without understanding, was a great reproach to them. Note, Christ expects from us some proportion of knowledge, and grace, and wisdom, according to the time and means we have had. See Joh 14:9; Heb 5:12; Ti2 3:7, Ti2 3:8.

3.The explication Christ gave them of this doctrine of pollutions. Though he chid them for their dulness, he did not cast them off, but pitied them, and taught them, as Luk 24:25-27. He here shows us,

(1.)What little danger we are in of pollution from that which entereth in at the mouth, Mat 15:17. An inordinate appetite, intemperance, and excess in eating, come out of the heart, and are defiling; but meat in itself is not so, as the Pharisees supposed. What there is of dregs and defilement in our meat, nature (or rather God of nature) has provided a way to clear us of it; it goes in at the belly, and is cast out into the draught, and nothing remains to us but pure nourishment. So fearfully and wonderfully are we made and preserved, and our souls held in life. The expulsive faculty is as necessary in the body as any other, for the discharge of that which is superfluous, or noxious; so happily is nature enabled to help itself, and shift for its own good: by this means nothing defiles; if we eat with unwashen hands, and so any thing unclean mix with our food, nature will separate it, and cast it out, and it will be no defilement to us. It may be a piece of cleanliness, but it is not point of conscience, to wash before meat; and we go upon a great mistake if we place religion in it. It is not the practice itself, but the opinion it is built upon, that Christ condemns, as if meat commended us to God (Co1 8:8); whereas Christianity stands not in such observances.

(2.)What great danger we are in of pollution from that which proceeds out of the mouth (Mat 15:18), out of the abundance of the heart: compare Mat 12:34. There is no defilement in the products of God's bounty; the defilement arises from the products of out corruption. Now here we have,

[1.]The corrupt fountain of that which proceeds out of the mouth; it comes from the heart; that is the spring and source of all sin, Jer 8:7. It is the heart that is so desperately wicked (Jer 17:9); for there is no sin in a word or deed, which was not first in the heart. There is the root of bitterness, which bears gall and wormwood. It is the inward part of a sinner, that is very wickedness, Psa 5:9. All evil speakings come forth from the heart, and are defiling; from the corrupt heart comes the corrupt communication.

[2.]Some of the corrupt streams which flow from this fountain, specified; though they do not all come out of the mouth, yet they all come out of the man, and are the fruits of that wickedness which is in the heart, and is wrought there, Psa 58:2.

First, Evil thoughts, sins against all the commandments. Therefore David puts vain thoughts in opposition to the whole law, Psa 119:113. These are the first-born of the corrupt nature, the beginning of its strength, and do most resemble it. These, as the son and heir, abide in the house, and lodge within us. There is a great deal of sin that begins and ends in the heart, and goes no further. Carnal fancies and imaginations are evil thoughts, wickedness in the contrivance (dialogismoi ponēroi), wicked plots, purposes, and devices of mischief to others, Mic 2:1.

Secondly, Murders, sins against the sixth commandment; these come from a malice in the heart against our brother's life, or a contempt of it. Hence he that hates his brother, is said to be a murderer; he is so at God's bar, Jo1 3:15. War is in the heart, Psa 55:21; Jam 4:1

Thirdly, Adulteries and fornications, sins against the seventh commandment; these come from the wanton, unclean, carnal heart; and the lust that reigns there, is conceived there, and brings forth these sins, Jam 1:15. There is adultery in the heart first, and then in the act, Mat 5:28.

Fourthly, Thefts, sins against the eighth commandment; cheats, wrongs, rapines, and all injurious contracts; the fountain of all these is in the heart, that is it that is exercised in these covetous practices (Pe2 2:14), that is set upon riches, Psa 62:10. Achan coveted, and then took, Jos 7:20, Jos 7:21.

Fifthly, False witness, against the ninth commandment; this comes from a complication of falsehood and covetousness, or falsehood and covetousness, or falsehood and malice in the heart. If truth, holiness, and love, which God requires in the inward parts, reigned as they ought, there would be no false witness bearing, Psa 64:6 : Jer 9:8.

Sixthly, Blasphemies, speaking evil of God, against the third commandment; speaking evil of our neighbour, against the ninth commandment; these come from a contempt and disesteem of both in the heart; thence the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost proceeds (Mat 12:31, Mat 12:32); these are the overflowing of the gall within.

Now these are the things which defile a man, Mat 15:20. Note, Sin is defiling to the soul, renders it unlovely and abominable in the eyes of a pure and holy God; unfit for communion with him, and for the enjoyment of him in the new Jerusalem, into which nothing shall enter that defileth or worketh iniquity. The mind and conscience are defiled by sin, and that makes every thing else so, Tit 1:15. This defilement by sin was signified by the ceremonial pollutions which the Jewish doctors added to, but understood not. See Heb 9:13, Heb 9:14; Jo1 1:7.

These therefore are the things we must carefully avoid, and all approaches toward them, and not lay stress upon the washing of the hands. Christ doth not yet repeal the law of the distinction of meats (that was not done till Acts 10), but the tradition of the elders, which was tacked to that law; and therefore he concludes, To eat with unwashen hands (which was the matter now in question), this defileth not a man. If he wash, he is not the better before God; if he wash not, he is not the worse.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 10–20. Public domain.
Copy as
TertullianAD 220
The Prescription Against Heretics
"The Lord (beholdeth and) knoweth them that are His; " and "the plant which (my heavenly Father) hath not planted, He rooteth up; " and "the first shall," as He shows, "be last; " and He carries "His fan in His hand to purge His threshing-floor.
Hilary of Poitiers (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 367
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
What He intends then by a plant not planted of His Father, is that tradition of men under cover of which the Law had been transgressed, this He instructs them must be rooted up.
Chromatius of AquileiaAD 406
TRACTATE ON MATTHEW 53.7
Since the scribes and Pharisees had burst forth in great arrogance and transgressed the divine law, they “planted” their own precepts but not God’s. They wanted these to be observed as divine law. So, not without good reason, did they too, with this planting of their own doctrine, deserve to be uprooted by the Lord. And so the Lord said, “Every plant that my heavenly Father has not planted will be rooted up.” Indeed, that plant was not of God but of people. Any iniquitous plant, not only of the scribes and Pharisees but also of all heretics, shall be uprooted by the Lord. Though it may extend its branches of infidelity in due season, it cannot be firmly rooted, for such a plant is not of God but of the devil. Furthermore, it must be uprooted and consigned to perpetual fire, since it yields no fruit of faith and wholesomeness.
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on the Gospel of Matthew 51
When therefore they had heard these things, "the Pharisees," it is said, "were offended," not the multitudes. For "His disciples," so it is said, "came and said unto Him, Knowest thou that the Pharisees were offended, when they heard the saying?" Yet surely nothing had been said unto them.

What then saith Christ? He did not remove the offense in respect of them, but reproved them, saying, "Every plant which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up." For He is wont both to despise offenses, and not to despise them. Elsewhere, for example, He saith, "But lest we should offend them, cast an hook into the sea:" but here He saith, "Let them alone, they be blind leaders of the blind: and if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch."

But these things His disciples said, not as grieving for those men only, but as being themselves also slightly perplexed. But because they durst not say so in their own person, they would fain learn it by their telling Him of others. And as to its being so, hear how after this the ardent and ever-forward Peter came to Him, and saith, "Declare unto us this parable," discovering the trouble in his soul, and not indeed venturing to say openly, "I am offended," but requiring that by His interpretation he should be freed from his perplexity; wherefore also he was reproved.

What then saith Christ? "Every plant which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up."

This, they that are diseased with the Manichaean pest affirm to be spoken of the law; but their mouths are stopped by what had been said before. For if He was speaking of the law, how doth He further back defend it, and fight for it, saying, "Why do ye transgress the commandments of God for your tradition?" And how doth He bring forward the prophet? But of themselves and of their traditions He so speaks. For if God said, "Honor thy father and thy mother," how is not that of God's planting, which was spoken by God?

And what follows also indicates, that of themselves it was said, and of their traditions. Thus He added, "They are blind leaders of the blind." Whereas, had He spoken it of the law, He would have said, "It is a blind leader of the blind." But not so did He speak, but, "They are blind leaders of the blind:" freeing it from the blame, and bringing it all round upon them.

Then to sever the people also from them, as being on the point of falling into a pit by their means, He saith, "If the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch."

It is a great evil merely to be blind, but to be in such a case and have none to lead him, nay, to occupy the place of a guide, is a double and triple ground of censure. For if it be a dangerous thing for the blind man not to have a guide, much more so that he should even desire to be guide to another.
John Chrysostom (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 407
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
When the Pharisees heard the things that went before, they made no reply to them, because He had so mightily overthrown them, not only refuting their arguments, but detecting their fraud, but they, not the multitudes, were offended at them; Then came his disciples unto him and said, Knowest thou that the Pharisees were offended after they heard this saying?

Christ does not remove the stumblingblock out of the way of the Pharisees, but rather rebukes them; as it follows, But he answered and said, Every plant which my heavenly Father has not planted shall be rooted up. This Manichæus affirmed was spoken of the Law, but what has been already said is a sufficient refutation of this. For if He had said this of the Law, how would He have above contended for the Law, saying, Why transgress ye the commandment of God through your tradition? Or would He have cited the Prophet? Or how, if God said, Honour thy father and thy mother, is not this, being spoken in the Law, a plant of God?
JeromeAD 420
COMMENTARY ON MATTHEW 2.15.13
Even what seems to be clear in the Scriptures presents many problems. Christ said, “Every plant that my heavenly Father has not planted will be uprooted.” Does this mean, therefore, that there will be uprooted also that plant which the apostle speaks of when Paul says, “I have planted, Apollos watered”? The problem is solved, however, from the words that follow: “But God has given the growth.” He also says, “You are God’s field, God’s building.” And in another place we read, “We are God’s coworkers”; therefore, if we are his coworkers, with Paul planting and Apollos watering, God plants and waters with his workers.
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Matthew
(Verse 13.) But he answered and said, Every plant which my heavenly Father planted not, shall be rooted up. Even those things which seem plain in the Scriptures, are full of questions. Every plant, he says, which my heavenly Father planted not, shall be rooted up. Therefore, that plantation also shall be rooted up, of which the Apostle says, I have planted, Apollos watered (1 Cor. III, 6). But the question is resolved by what follows: But God gave the increase (Ibid., 9). He himself also says: You are God's field, God's building (1 Corinthians 3:9). And in another place: We are God's co-workers. Now if we are co-workers, then God is the one who plants and waters, while Paul and Apollos are only servants who work with God (1 Corinthians 3:6-7). Some people misuse this passage, introducing various interpretations, and say: If the planting that the Father did not plant will be uprooted, then the planting that he did plant cannot be uprooted. But listen to what Jeremiah says: 'I planted a true vineyard, how have you turned into the bitterness of a foreign vine?' (Jeremiah II, 21). Indeed, God planted it, and no one can uproot His plantation. But because this planting is in the will of one's own free choice, no one else can uproot it unless it itself gives consent.
Jerome (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 420
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
In one of the Lord's discourses the whole superstition of Jewish observances had been cut down. They placed their whole religion in using or abstaining from certain meats.

As this word 'scandalum' (offence or stumblingblock) is of such frequent use in ecclesiastical writings, we will shortly explain it. We might render it in Latin, 'offendiculum,' or 'ruina,' or 'impactio;' and so when we read, Whosoever shall scandalize, we understand, Whoso by word or deed has given an occasion of falling to any.

Shall that plant also be rooted up of which the Apostle says, I planted, Apollos watered? (1 Cor. 3:6.) The question is answered by what follows, but God gave the increase. He says also, Ye are God's husbandry, a building of God; and in another place, We are workers together of God. And if when Paul plants, and Apollos waters, they are in so doing workers together with God, then God plants and waters together with them. This passage is abused by some who apply it at once to two different kinds of men; they say, 'If every plant, which the Father hath not planted shall be rooted up, then that which He has planted cannot be rooted up.' But let them hear these words of Jeremiah, I had planted thee a true vine, wholly a right seed, how then art thou turned into the bitterness of a strange vine? (Jer. 2:21.) God indeed has planted it, and none may root up His planting. But since that planting was through the disposition of the will of him which was planted, none other can root it up unless its own will consents thereto.

This is also the same as that Apostolic injunction, A heretic after the first and second admonition reject, knowing that such a one is perverse. (Tit. 3:10, 11.) To the same end the Saviour commands evil teachers to be left to their own will, knowing that it is hardly that they can be brought to the truth.
Remigius of Rheims (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 533
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
But if any one's faith be so strong that he understands that God's creature can in no way be defiled, let him eat what he will, after the food has been hallowed by the word of God and of prayer; yet so that this his liberty be not made an offence to the weak, as the Apostle speaks.

Every false doctrine and superstitious observance with the workers thereof cannot endure; and because it is not from God the Father, it shall be rooted up with the same. And that only shall endure which is of God.
Rabanus Maurus (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 856
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
They are blind, that is, they want the light of God's commandments; and they are leaders of the blind, inasmuch as they draw others headlong, erring, and leading into error; whence it is added, If the blind lead the blind, they both fall into the ditch.
Glossa Ordinaria (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 1274
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(interlin.) Or, the plant here spoken of may be the doctors of the Law with their followers, who had not Christ for their foundation. Why they are to be rooted up, He adds, Let them alone; they are blind, leaders of the blind.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Matthew 15:13 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.