Skip to content

Matthew 1:13

“The Genealogy of Jesus Christ”Matthew 1:1–17

King James Version
And Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor;

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
And G1161 Zorobabel G2216 begat G1080 Abiud G10; and G1161 Abiud G10 begat G1080 Eliakim G1662; and G1161 Eliakim G1662 begat G1080 Azor G107;

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
Zerubbabel the father of Abiud, Abiud the father of Eliakim, and Eliakim the father of Azor.

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
and Zerubbabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor;

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
Zerubbabel became the father of Abiud. Abiud became the father of Eliakim. Eliakim became the father of Azor.

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
And Zorobabel begate Abiud. And Abiud begate Eliacim. And Eliacim begate Azor.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
and Zerubbabel begat Abiud, and Abiud begat Eliakim, and Eliakim begat Azor,

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
15 Greek words
  1. ΖοροβαβὲλZorobabelZerubbabelG2216N-NSM-PNoun Nominative Singular Masculine Individual
  2. δὲdethenG1161CONJConjunction
  3. ἐγέννησενegennēsenbegatG1080V-AAI-3SVerb Aorist Active Indicative 3rd Singular
  4. τὸνton[the]G3588T-ASMDefinite article Accusative Singular Masculine
  5. Ἀβιούδ·AbioudAbiudG10N-ASM-PNoun Accusative Singular Masculine Individual
  6. ἈβιοὺδAbioudAbiudG10N-NSM-PNoun Nominative Singular Masculine Individual
  7. δὲdethenG1161CONJConjunction
  8. ἐγέννησενegennēsenbegatG1080V-AAI-3SVerb Aorist Active Indicative 3rd Singular
  9. τὸνton[the]G3588T-ASMDefinite article Accusative Singular Masculine
  10. Ἐλιακίμ·EliakimEliakimG1662N-ASM-PNoun Accusative Singular Masculine Individual
  11. ἘλιακὶμEliakimEliakimG1662N-NSM-PNoun Nominative Singular Masculine Individual
  12. δὲdethenG1161CONJConjunction
  13. ἐγέννησενegennēsenbegatG1080V-AAI-3SVerb Aorist Active Indicative 3rd Singular
  14. τὸνton[the]G3588T-ASMDefinite article Accusative Singular Masculine
  15. Ἀζώρ·AzōrAzorG107N-ASM-PNoun Accusative Singular Masculine Individual
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
All Matthew Sites (Jerusalem)
All Matthew Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
All Matthew Sites (Levant)
All Matthew Sites (Levant) View full PDF
All Matthew Sites (Eastern Mediterranean)
All Matthew Sites (Eastern Mediterranean) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 23,158 of 31,102 · 74.5%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

After Zerubbabel the line runs through Abiud, Eliakim and Azor, men of whom Scripture records little beyond their names.

“And Zorobabel begat Abiud;”

The generation after the return from Babylon. Abiud appears nowhere else in Scripture.

“and Abiud begat Eliakim;”

Eliakim is known only as a link in this line.

“and Eliakim begat Azor;”

Azor too, and each is joined to the next by the same dé, “and”.

Passage studyMatthew 1:1–17

Jesus Christ, Son of David and Son of Abraham

Summary

Matthew opens his Gospel with the family record of Jesus Christ, and in its first line he names him the son of David and the son of Abraham. The list runs from Abraham through Judah to David, down the kings of Judah to the exile in Babylon, and on through quiet generations to Joseph, the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born. Four women stand in it, along with faithful kings and wicked ones, and Matthew arranges the whole into three sets of fourteen generations. In these seventeen verses we see that God kept his promises to Abraham and to David across many centuries, that his grace reached into a family marked by sin and by outsiders, and that the whole history of Israel was moving toward Christ.

The son of David, the son of Abraham

The first verse is the title of Matthew’s Gospel, and it names its subject at once. “The book” is bíblos, which properly means the inner bark of the papyrus plant, and so a sheet or scroll of writing, here a written record. “Generation” is génesis, which means birth or origin, so the phrase means the account of where Jesus Christ came from. The Greek words biblos geneseos are the ones the Greek Old Testament uses for “This is the book of the generations of Adam” (Genesis 5:1). Genesis began with Adam, and Matthew begins a new account of God’s work with Jesus.

For Matthew’s first readers, most of them Jews, a genealogy was much more than a family tree. It was a legal record that settled a man’s identity, his tribe, his inheritance and his right to an office such as king or priest. Anyone said to be the Messiah had to come from David, because the prophets had said so. Matthew therefore opens his Gospel by setting out the record that shows who Jesus is.

“The son of David” was a recognised title of the Messiah, and people call Jesus by it later in this Gospel (Matthew 9:27). God had promised David a descendant whose throne he would establish for ever (2 Samuel 7:12–16, 7:16), and Isaiah foretold a child born to sit on David’s throne and rule it with justice for ever (Isaiah 9:6–7). Paul says that Jesus was made of the seed of David according to the flesh and declared to be the Son of God by the resurrection (Romans 1:3–4), and the angel told Mary that God would give her son the throne of his father David and that his kingdom would have no end (Luke 1:32–33).

“The son of Abraham” reaches further. God called Abraham and promised, “in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed” (Genesis 12:1–3, 12:3), and later, “in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed” (Genesis 22:18). Paul says that this seed is Christ (Galatians 3:16) and that in this promise the Scripture preached the gospel to Abraham beforehand (Galatians 3:8). So the King of Israel is also the one through whom the nations are blessed. In him Jew and Gentile are made one and the wall between them is broken down (Ephesians 2:14–16), and the Gospel that opens with the son of Abraham closes with the risen Christ, who has all power in heaven and earth (Matthew 28:18), sending his disciples to teach all nations (Matthew 28:19). All the promises of God in him are yea and amen (2 Corinthians 1:20).

How the record is written

The verb that carries the list is “begat”, gennáō, which means to father a child. It is properly said of the father, by extension of the mother, and figuratively it means to regenerate. It comes from a form of génos, race or stock. Matthew repeats the same form, egennēsen, “he begat”, with each name, and the little word dé, “and”, joins one clause to the next. The repetition gives the list the steady rhythm of a litany and keeps the line moving from father to son, generation after generation, toward the one at its end. That figurative sense of the verb fits him well, because the one born at the end of this line gives new birth to all who believe, and he is the only begotten Son of God (John 3:16).

Every name here belongs to real history. Jesus entered the world through a real family, with a real ancestry, and the record shows that his humanity was as real as theirs. The pattern holds unchanged until verse 16, where Matthew alters it on purpose, and the change is the key to the whole list.

Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Judah

The record starts with Abraám, whose name means “father of a multitude”, the man with whom God began his covenant with Israel. Isaac was the son of promise, born to Sarah after she had long been barren, when a child was humanly impossible. Jacob, Isaac’s son, was renamed Israel, and his twelve sons became the fathers of the twelve tribes. Paul reminds us that the line of promise runs through the children God chose (Romans 9:6–8).

Of the twelve, Matthew names only “Judas”, Ioúdas, the Greek form of Judah, a name that means “praise”. Judah was Jacob’s fourth son, and Jacob prophesied over him, “The sceptre shall not depart from Judah ... until Shiloh come” (Genesis 49:10). The kings were to come from Judah’s tribe, and so did David. Our Lord sprang out of Judah (Hebrews 7:14), and he is the Lion of the tribe of Judah (Revelation 5:5).

“His brethren” are the other eleven sons of Jacob: Reuben, Simeon, Levi, Dan, Naphtali, Gad, Asher, Issachar, Zebulun, Joseph and Benjamin. Matthew mentions them so that the whole family of Israel stands behind the line, while his eye stays on the branch that leads to Christ.

Four women in the line of the Messiah

Genealogies in Israel were traced through the fathers, so a mother’s name stands out. Matthew names four women before Mary: Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, and “her that had been the wife of Urias”. Each is introduced with ek, “of”, which means from or out of and marks the mother from whom the child was born. Their stories are unusual, some are scandalous, and several involve people from outside Israel. Matthew put them in on purpose.

Tamar

“Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar” recalls the account in Genesis 38. Judah withheld from his widowed daughter-in-law Tamar what she was owed, and she took her place in his family by deception. The twins Perez and Zerah were born of that union (Genesis 38:29), and God carried the line of the Messiah forward through Perez.

Rahab

Rhacháb is the Greek spelling of Rahab, the Canaanite harlot of Jericho who hid Israel’s spies (Joshua 2:1–21). The Canaanites were Israel’s enemies, yet Rahab is remembered for her faith (Hebrews 11:31) and became the mother of Boaz.

Ruth

Ruth was a Moabitess, from a people barred from the congregation of the LORD (Deuteronomy 23:3). She clung to her mother-in-law Naomi and to Naomi’s God, married Boaz, and bore Obed, the grandfather of David (Ruth 4:13–17).

The wife of Uriah

Matthew names Solomon’s mother by her first husband. The words “of her” stand for the Greek ek tēs, “out of the one”, and the KJV supplies “that had been the wife”. Ourías is the Greek form of Uriah, a name that means “the LORD is my light”. Uriah was a Hittite and one of David’s loyal soldiers. Calling Bathsheba his wife brings back at once the whole account of 2 Samuel 11: David’s adultery with her and his murder of her husband. After the child of that sin died, God gave David and Bathsheba Solomon (2 Samuel 12:24), and through him the royal line went on.

Why Matthew includes them

These women show from the first page of the Gospel what kind of Saviour this is. God kept his promise through a deceived father-in-law, a Canaanite harlot, a woman of Moab and a king’s adultery, and his grace was greater than all of it. “Where sin abounded, grace did much more abound” (Romans 5:20). Rahab and Ruth, and Uriah the Hittite behind Bathsheba, also show that Gentiles had a place in the Messiah’s family long before the gospel went out to them. In Christ there is neither Jew nor Greek (Galatians 3:28), and he has redeemed people out of every kindred, tongue, people and nation (Revelation 5:9–10).

Jesus took his place in a family marked by human frailty, and he himself was “in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin” (Hebrews 4:15). The list ends with a fifth woman, Mary, through whom salvation came to all.

From Judah to David

Verses 3 to 6 follow the same line that closes the book of Ruth, from Perez to David (Ruth 4:18–22), and that Chronicles records (1 Chronicles 2:9–10). Luke’s list passes through the same names (Luke 3:33). The line goes through Perez, and Zerah is left aside. Esrom is Hezron, and Aram is Ram.

Little is told of Aminadab beyond his place here, but his son Naasson, the Nahshon of the Old Testament, was the prince of the tribe of Judah in the wilderness (Numbers 1:7). When the tabernacle was dedicated, he was the first of the princes to bring his offering (Numbers 7:12). Salmon, his son, married Rahab and was the father of Boaz.

Boaz, “Booz” in the KJV, is the man of integrity in the book of Ruth who acted as kinsman-redeemer for Ruth and Naomi. In this he points to Christ, the greater Redeemer, who came for the lost sheep of Israel and for every nation. Boaz, Ruth, Obed and Jesse all belonged to Bethlehem, the town where the prophet said the ruler of Israel would be born (Micah 5:2).

Jesse is remembered as the father of David, the son whom God chose and Samuel anointed (1 Samuel 16:1–13). Isaiah foretold a rod coming out of the stem of Jesse (Isaiah 11:1). In verse 6 David is twice called “the king”, basileús, the word for a sovereign ruler. He alone in the list bears the title, because he was the king to whom God made the covenant of an everlasting throne. The first part of the list ends with him and the second begins with him.

The kings of Judah, faithful and wicked

From Solomon to Josiah the list is a roll of the kings of Judah, and Matthew gives them all the same plain words. Their reigns are told in Kings and Chronicles, among them the four kings of verse 9 (2 Kings 15, 2 Chronicles 26).

  • Solomon built the first temple in Jerusalem and was famed for his wisdom, but his later idolatry helped bring the kingdom to division.
  • Roboam, Rehoboam, made the foolish decisions that split the kingdom in two (1 Kings 12).
  • Abia, Abijah (also called Abijam), reigned briefly, at war with the northern kingdom of Israel.
  • Asa, Asá, was a reforming king who removed idols and sought to restore the worship of the LORD (1 Kings 15:11–24).
  • Josaphat, Jehoshaphat, was also a largely righteous king, known for his reforms and for having the people taught the Law.
  • Joram, Iōrám, also called Jehoram, was wicked, led astray largely through his marriage to Athaliah, the daughter of Ahab and Jezebel (2 Kings 8:16–24).
  • Ozias, Uzziah, began his reign in righteousness and prosperity, but in his pride he went where the law forbade him and ended his days a leper (2 Chronicles 26:16–21).
  • Joatham, Jotham, followed the LORD and strengthened the kingdom (2 Kings 15:34–35).
  • Achaz, Ahaz, was one of Judah’s most wicked kings. He worshipped idols, made his son pass through the fire, and leaned on Assyria instead of on God (2 Kings 16:3–9). It was to Ahaz that Isaiah gave the sign of the virgin’s son, Immanuel (Isaiah 7:14).
  • Ezekias, Ezekías, from the Hebrew Chizqîyâh, is Hezekiah, one of the most righteous kings of Judah. He destroyed idols, restored the temple worship and trusted the LORD when Assyria besieged Jerusalem (2 Kings 18:3–7).
  • Manasses, Manasseh, his son, was Judah’s most notorious king, who brought in pagan worship and shed innocent blood. Late in life, in his distress, he humbled himself before God and repented (2 Chronicles 33:12–13).
  • Amon followed his father’s wickedness and took no part in his repentance, in a short and evil reign.
  • Josias, Iōsías, is Josiah, who led Judah back to the Law of Moses and purged the land of idols, a last great return to God before the exile.

The kings of verses 9 and 10 ruled mostly in the eighth century before Christ and after, when Assyria and then Babylon pressed on Judah. Matthew lists the good and the bad side by side, and the list shows that God’s promise to David rested on God himself. He had sworn, “Thy seed will I establish for ever, and build up thy throne to all generations” (Psalm 89:3–4), and he kept that oath through wise kings and foolish ones, through reform and apostasy. To Israel belong the covenants and the promises (Romans 9:4), and of them, as concerning the flesh, Christ came (Romans 9:5). Joseph was of the house and lineage of David (Luke 2:4), and Jesus calls himself the root and the offspring of David (Revelation 22:16).

The list also shows how much Israel needed a better King. Hezekiah and Josiah brought reforms that lasted only a while and could save their people from judgment for only a time. Jesus reigns in perfect righteousness and goes further than any reformer, for he is “the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29). God commends his love to us in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us (Romans 5:8).

Why three kings are missing after Joram

Verse 8 says “Joram begat Ozias”, but Chronicles lists three kings between them, Ahaziah, Joash and Amaziah (1 Chronicles 3:11–12). Matthew left them out deliberately. Genealogies of his day were often shortened or arranged by number, to help memory or to make a point, and Matthew condenses this part of the line to fit his pattern of three fourteens, which he states in verse 17. Some have also suggested a judgment in the choice, since these three came after Joram’s marriage to Athaliah joined the royal line to the house of Ahab. Either way, the record stays true to its purpose, which is to show the line from David to Christ.

Carried away to Babylon

Verse 11 marks the great turning point of the list. “Carried away” is metoikesía, a change of abode, which here means deportation, a people removed from their home by force. Babylon, Babylṓn, the capital of Chaldea, besieged Jerusalem under Nebuchadnezzar. The temple was destroyed in 586 BC, and the royal family, the leading men and the skilled workers were taken away. Jeremiah had warned that this would come as judgment for Judah’s long idolatry (Jeremiah 25, 25:8–11, 25:11–12), and Isaiah had warned Hezekiah of Babylon (Isaiah 39). In Scripture Babylon becomes a picture of worldly power set against God’s people.

The exile looked like the end of God’s promise of an everlasting throne. It closed the line of kings reigning in Jerusalem, yet the line of David went on. “Jechonias and his brethren” are Jechoniah, also called Jehoiachin or Coniah, and his brothers, adelphós, members of the royal house who shared the exile. Genealogies usually follow one son, so naming the brothers shows that the whole house of David went into captivity together. Jechoniah reigned only briefly and was carried away to Babylon (2 Kings 24:10–16).

Jechoniah and Jeremiah’s word against him

Jeremiah said of Coniah, “no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of David, and ruling any more in Judah” (Jeremiah 22:30), and yet Matthew carries the line through him. That word concerned sitting and ruling on the throne in Jerusalem, and the line itself went on, kept for the Messiah. The gifts and calling of God are without repentance (Romans 11:29), and through Jeremiah God also promised to raise up to David a righteous Branch (Jeremiah 23:5, 33:14–17).

Shealtiel and Zerubbabel

Verse 12 begins the third part of the list. Salathiel, Shealtiel, was born after the deportation. His son Zorobabel, Zorobábel, the Zerubbabel of the Old Testament, led exiles home to Jerusalem after the decree of Cyrus and began the rebuilding of the temple (Ezra 3, Ezra 3:8). Haggai’s prophecies are addressed to him (Haggai 1:1), and he and the people obeyed the voice of the LORD (Haggai 1:12). Zerubbabel’s work points to Jesus, who spoke of the temple of his body (John 2:19–21) and restores God’s people more fully than any return from Babylon.

The exile pictures a deeper captivity. Jesus came to set his people free from sin and death, for the wages of sin is death, and the gift of God is eternal life (Romans 6:23). God was in Christ reconciling the world to himself (2 Corinthians 5:19), and he has delivered us from the power of darkness into the kingdom of his dear Son (Colossians 1:13–14). His kingdom is of another order than the thrones of Judah: “My kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:36).

The quiet generations after the exile

After Zerubbabel come Abiud, Eliakim, Azor, Sadoc, Achim, Eliud, Eleazar, Matthan and Jacob. Abiud is mentioned nowhere else in Scripture, and the rest are known to us almost only from this record. They lived after the return, when the Jews were under foreign rule and longed for their kingdom to be restored and for the Messiah to come. Their names carry quiet testimony. Eliud, Elioúd, means “God of majesty” or “God of praise”, Eleazar means “God has helped”, and Matthan means “gift”. Luke’s list also passes through Zerubbabel (Luke 3:27–28).

The last of them is Jacob, Iakṓb, a name that means “supplanter” or “heel-grabber”. This Jacob is a different man from the patriarch of verse 2. He was the father of Joseph.

These generations show that God’s work goes forward through ordinary lives as surely as through kings and prophets. Nothing in their time looked remarkable, yet God was bringing his promise near, until “when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law” (Galatians 4:4).

Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus

Verse 16 begins in the usual way, “Jacob begat Joseph”, and then the pattern changes. Matthew calls Joseph “the husband of Mary”, using anḗr, the word for a man or husband, and then writes “of whom was born Jesus”. In Greek this is ex hēs egennēthē Iēsous. The word for “of whom” is feminine, so it refers to Mary alone, and the verb “was born” is the same gennáō, now in the passive. Every name before Joseph is said to have begotten the next, and here Matthew carefully avoids saying that Joseph begat Jesus. He prepares us for what he tells next, that Mary was found with child of the Holy Ghost (Matthew 1:18–25, 1:18–20). Isaiah had said, “Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel” (Isaiah 7:14), and Gabriel told Mary that the Holy Ghost would come upon her and that her child would be called the Son of God (Luke 1:34–35).

Joseph still matters to the record. By Jewish custom the husband of the mother was the legal father of her child, so Jesus received through Joseph the legal right of David’s house. Through Mary he is truly human, and by his conception of the Holy Ghost he is the Son of God. The Word was made flesh and dwelt among us (John 1:14).

“Who is called Christ” gives his office. Christós comes from chriō, to anoint, and means “anointed”, the Greek equivalent of the Hebrew mashiach, Messiah. In Israel kings and priests, and sometimes prophets, were anointed as a sign that God had appointed them. Christ is a title declaring that Jesus is the King and Deliverer the prophets promised, and the whole Gospel of Matthew unfolds from it.

Does the genealogy prove that Jesus is God?

The genealogy itself establishes his human descent and his right as the Messiah of Abraham’s and David’s line. It shows God’s hand in bringing him at the right time, and it hints at a greater power at work in births such as Isaac’s. The full witness to his divinity comes in the rest of Matthew’s Gospel: his conception by the Holy Ghost (Matthew 1:18), his teaching and miracles, his resurrection, and his claim to all power in heaven and in earth (Matthew 28:18–20).

Why Luke’s list is different

Luke also gives Jesus’ genealogy, tracing it back to Adam (Luke 3:23–38), and many of its names differ from Matthew’s after David. Believers differ on how the two fit together. Many hold that Luke gives Mary’s line while Matthew gives Joseph’s legal line, and so Luke shows Jesus’ connection to all mankind. Others hold that Luke too follows Joseph, tracing another line of legal succession. Both views agree that Jesus is truly the son of David and the heir of God’s promises.

Why Matthew counts three sets of fourteen

Verse 17 sums up the record. “Generations” is geneá, a generation, a line of descent, or a period of time. Matthew divides the history into three spans of fourteen generations, from Abraham to David, from David to the carrying away into Babylon, and from the carrying away, metoikesía again, to Christ. The first span runs from the promise to the kingdom, the second from the height of David’s throne down through decline to judgment, and the third through the long years of waiting after the exile. Each ends at a great turning point, and the last ends in Christ.

The count is arranged on purpose. As verse 8 shows, Matthew passed over some names, and his list is shorter than the records in Chronicles (1 Chronicles 3). Ancient genealogies were written to establish a line and make a point, and Matthew’s shape tells us that God ordered this history and brought his Son at the time he had set.

Many see a reason for the number fourteen in David’s name. Hebrew letters also served as numbers, and the three letters of David’s name, D-V-D (dalet, vav, dalet), add up to 4 + 6 + 4 = 14. On this reading the very shape of the list says “David” three times over, and points to Jesus as the son of David and heir of his throne.

The God who kept this family line

This list of names teaches us to trust God’s timing. He made promises to Abraham and to David and kept them through centuries of faithfulness and failure, captivity and silence, until Christ was born. He is just as faithful to the promises he has made to us, and he works all things together for good to them that love him (Romans 8:28). In Christ all things hold together (Colossians 1:17), and God’s purpose is to gather together in one all things in him (Ephesians 1:10).

The record also shows the reach of God’s grace. Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, Bathsheba, David and Manasseh are all here, and Jesus was glad to be known as their descendant. Your past and your family history lie open before the same grace that wrote these names into the line of the Saviour, and Rahab the Canaanite and Ruth of Moab are a welcome to every nation.

And the quiet names matter. Abiud, Azor and Achim lived and died with nothing recorded of them beyond their place in this list, and God counted each one as he carried his promise forward. A life of faithful obedience in an ordinary generation, handing on the faith to those who come after, has its place in the same story.

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Matthew 1:1–17. He set out his notes in a two-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 17 verses
Passage under commentMatthew 1:1–17
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Concerning this genealogy of our Saviour, observe,

I.The title of it.

It is the book (or the account, as the Hebrew word sepher, a book, sometimes signifies) of the generation of Jesus Christ, of his ancestors according to the flesh; or, It is the narrative of his birth. It is Biblos Geneseōs - a book of Genesis. The Old Testament begins with the book of the generation of the world, and it is its glory that it does so; but the glory of the New Testament herein excelleth, that it begins with the book of the generation of him that made the world. As God, his outgoings were of old, from everlasting (Micah 5:2), and none can declare that generation; but, as man, he was sent forth in the fulness of time, born of a woman, and it is that generation which is here declared.

II.The principal intention of it.

It is not an endless or needless genealogy; it is not a vain-glorious one, as those of great men commonly are. Stemmata, quid faciunt? - Of what avail are ancient pedigrees? It is like a pedigree given in evidence, to prove a title, and make out a claim; the design is to prove that our Lord Jesus is the son of David, and the son of Abraham, and therefore of that nation and family out of which the Messiah was to arise. Abraham and David were, in their day, the great trustees of the promise relating to the Messiah. The promise of the blessing was made to Abraham and his seed, of the dominion to David and his seed; and they who would have an interest in Christ, as the son of Abraham, in whom all the families of the earth are to be blessed, must be faithful, loyal subjects to him as the son of David, by whom all the families of the earth are to be ruled. It was promised to Abraham that Christ should descend from him (Genesis 12:3; Genesis 22:18), and to David that he should descend from him (2 Samuel 7:12; Psalm 89:3, etc.; Psalm 132:11); and therefore, unless it can be proved that Jesus is a son of David, and a son of Abraham, we cannot admit him to be the Messiah. Now this is here proved from the authentic records of the heralds' offices. The Jews were very exact in preserving their pedigrees, and there was a providence in it, for the clearing up of the descent of the Messiah from the fathers; and since his coming that nation is so dispersed and confounded that it is a question whether any person in the world can legally prove himself to be a son of Abraham; however, it is certain that none can prove himself to either a son of Aaron or a son of David, so that the priestly and kingly office must either be given up, as lost for ever, or be lodged in the hands of our Lord Jesus. Christ is here first called the son of David, because under that title he was commonly spoken of, and expected, among the Jews. They who owned him to be the Christ, called him the son of David, Matthew 15:22; Matthew 20:31; Matthew 21:15. Thus, therefore, the evangelist undertakes to make out, that he is not only a son of David, but that son of David on whose shoulders the government was to be; not only a son of Abraham, but that son of Abraham who was to be the father of many nations.

In calling Christ the son of David, and the son of Abraham, he shows that God is faithful to his promise, and will make good every word that he has spoken; and this. 1. Though the performance be long deferred. When God promised Abraham a son, who should be the great blessing of the world, perhaps he expected it should be his immediate son; but it proved to be one at the distance of forty-two generations, and about 2000 years: so long before can God foretel what shall be done, and so long after, sometimes, does God fulfil what has been promised. Note, Delays of promised mercies, though they exercise our patience, do not weaken God's promise. 2. Though it begin to be despaired of. This son of David, and son of Abraham, who was to be the glory of his Father's house, was born when the seed of Abraham was a despised people, recently become tributary to the Roman yoke, and when the house of David was buried in obscurity; for Christ was to be a root out of a dry ground. Note, God's time for the performance of his promises is when it labours under the greatest improbabilities.

III.The particular series of it, drawn in the direct line from Abraham downward, according to the genealogies recorded in the beginning of the books of Chronicles (as far as those go), and which here we see the use of.

Some particulars we may observe in the genealogy.

1.Among the ancestors of Christ who had brethren, generally he descended from a younger brother; such Abraham himself was, and Jacob, and Judah, and David, and Nathan, and Rhesa; to show that the pre-eminence of Christ came not, as that of earthly princes, from the primogeniture of his ancestors, but from the will of God, who, according to the method of his providence, exalteth them of low degree, and puts more abundant honour upon that part which lacked.

2.Among the sons of Jacob, besides Judah, from whom Shiloh came, notice is here taken of his brethren: Judas and his brethren. No mention is made of Ishmael the son of Abraham, or of Esau the son of Isaac, because they were shut out of the church; whereas all the children of Jacob were taken in, and, though not fathers of Christ, were yet patriarchs of the church (Acts 7:8), and therefore are mentioned in the genealogy, for the encouragement of the twelve tribes that were scattered abroad, intimating to them that they have an interest in Christ, and stand in relation to him as well as Judah.

3.Phares and Zara, the twin-sons of Judah, are likewise both named, though Phares only was Christ's ancestor, for the same reason that the brethren of Judah are taken notice of; and some think because the birth of Phares and Zara had something of an allegory in it. Zara put out his hand first, as the first-born, but, drawing it in, Phares got the birth-right. The Jewish church, like Zara, reached first at the birthright, but through unbelief, withdrawing the hand, the Gentile church, like Phares, broke forth and went away with the birthright; and thus blindness is in part happened unto Israel, till the fulness of the Gentiles become in, and then Zara shall be born - all Israel shall be saved, Romans 11:25, Romans 11:26.

4.There are four women, and but four, named in this genealogy; two of them were originally strangers to the commonwealth of Israel, Rachab a Canaanitess, and a harlot besides, and Ruth the Moabitess; for in Jesus Christ there is neither Greek, nor Jew; those that are strangers and foreigners are welcome, in Christ, to the citizenship of the saints. The other two were adulteresses, Tamar and Bathsheba; which was a further mark of humiliation put upon our Lord Jesus, that not only he descended from such, but that is decent from them is particularly remarked in his genealogy, and no veil drawn over it. He took upon him the likeness of sinful flesh (Romans 8:3), and takes even great sinners, upon their repentance, into the nearest relation to himself. Note, We ought not to upbraid people with the scandals of their ancestors; it is what they cannot help, and has been the lot of the best, even of our Master himself. David's begetting Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias is taken notice of (says Dr. Whitby) to show that the crime of David, being repented to, was so far from hindering the promise made to him, that it pleased God by this very woman to fulfil it.

5.Though divers kings are here named, yet none is expressly called a king but David (Matthew 1:6), David the king; because with him the covenant of royalty was made, and to him the promise of the kingdom of the Messiah was given, who is therefore said to inherit the throne of his father David, Luke 1:32.

6.In the pedigree of the kings of Judah, between Joram and Ozias (Matthew 1:8), there are three left out, namely, Ahaziah, Joash, and Amaziah; and therefore when it is said, Joram begat Ozias, it is meant, according to the usage of the Hebrew tongue, that Ozias was lineally descended from him, as it is said to Hezekiah that the sons which he should beget should be carried to Babylon, whereas they were removed several generations from him. It was not through mistake or forgetfulness that these three were omitted, but, probably, they were omitted in the genealogical tables that the evangelist consulted, which yet were admitted as authentic. Some give this reason for it: - It being Matthew's design, for the sake of memory, to reduce the number of Christ's ancestors to three fourteens, it was requisite that in this period three should be left out, and none more fit than they who were the immediate progeny of cursed Athaliah, who introduced the idolatry of Ahab into the house of David, for which this brand is set upon the family and the iniquity thus visited to the third and fourth generation. Two of these three were apostates; and such God commonly sets a mark of his displeasure upon in this world: they all three had their heads brought to the grave with blood.

7.Some observe what a mixture there was of good and bad in the succession of these kings; as for instance (Matthew 1:7, Matthew 1:8), wicked Roboam begat wicked Abia; wicked Abia begat good Asa; good Asa begat good Josaphat; good Josaphat begat wicked Joram. Grace does not run in the blood, neither does reigning sin. God's grace is his own, and he gives or withholds it as he pleases.

8.The captivity of Babylon is mentioned as a remarkable period in this line, Matthew 1:11, Matthew 1:12. All things considered, it was a wonder that the Jews were not lost in that captivity, as other nations have been; but this intimates the reason why the streams of that people were kept to run pure through that dead sea, because from them, as concerning the flesh, Christ was to come. Destroy it not, for a blessing is in it, even that blessing of blessings, Christ himself, Isaiah 65:8, Isaiah 65:9. It was with an eye to him that they were restored, and the desolations of the sanctuary were looked upon with favour for the Lord's sake, Daniel 9:17.

9.Josias is said to beget Jechonias and his brethren (Matthew 1:11); by Jechonias here is meant Jehoiakim, who was the first-born of Josias; but, when it is said (Matthew 1:12) that Jechonias begat Salathiel, that Jechonias was the son of that Jehoiakim who was carried into Babylon, and there begat Salathiel (as Dr. Whitby shows), and, when Jechonias is said to have been written childless (Jeremiah 22:30), it is explained thus: No man of his seed shall prosper. Salathiel is here said to beget Zorobabel, whereas Salathiel begat Pedaiah, and he begat Zorobabel (1 Chronicles 3:19): but, as before, the grandson is often called the son; Pedaiah, it is likely, died in his father's lifetime, and so his son Zorobabel was called the son of Salathiel.

10.The line is brought down, not to Mary the mother of our Lord, but to Joseph the husband of Mary (Matthew 1:16); for the Jews always reckoned their genealogies by the males: yet Mary was of the same tribe and family with Joseph, so that, both by his mother and by his supposed father, he was of the house of David; yet his interest in that dignity is derived by Joseph, to whom really according to the flesh he had no relation, to show that the kingdom of the Messiah is not founded in a natural descent from David.

11.The centre in whom all these lines meet is Jesus, who is called Christ, Matthew 1:16. This is he that was so importunately desired, so impatiently expected, and to whom the patriarchs had an eye when they were so desirous of children, that they might have the honour of coming into the sacred line. Blessed be God, we are not now in such a dark and cloudy state of expectation as they were then in, but see clearly what these prophets and kings saw as through a glass darkly. And we may have, if it be not our own fault, a greater honour than that of which they were so ambitious: for they who do the will of God are in a more honourable relation to Christ than those who were akin to him according to the flesh, Matthew 12:50. Jesus is called Christ, that is, the Anointed, the same with the Hebrew name Messiah. He is called Messiah the Prince (Daniel 9:25), and often God's Anointed (Psalm 2:2). Under this character he was expected: Art thou the Christ - the anointed one? David, the king, was anointed (1 Samuel 16:13); so was Aaron, the priest (Leviticus 8:12), and Elisha, the prophet (1 Kings 19:16), and Isaiah, the prophet (Isaiah 61:1). Christ, being appointed to, and qualified for, all these offices, is therefore called the Anointed - anointed with the oil of gladness above his fellows; and from this name of his, which is as ointment poured forth, all his followers are called Christians, for they also have received the anointing.

Lastly. The general summary of all this genealogy we have, Matthew 1:17, where it is summed up in three fourteens, signalized by remarkable periods. In the first fourteen, we have the family of David rising, and looking forth as the morning; in the second, we have it flourishing in its meridian lustre; in the third, we have it declining and growing less and less, dwindling into the family of a poor carpenter, and then Christ shines forth out of it, the glory of his people Israel.

Historical interpretation

Eight Centuries of Reception

6 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

6 quotes · AD 397–1150
Post-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
40050060070080090010001100

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

d. AD 397Ambrose of Milanas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
Of whom Jeremiah speaks. Write this man dethroned; for there shall not spring of his seed one sitting on the throne of David. (Jer. 22:30.) How is this said of the Prophet, that none of the seed of Jeconias should reign? For if Christ reigned, and Christ was of the seed of Jeconiah, then has the Prophet spoken falsely. But it is not there declared that there shall be none of the seed of Jeconiah, and so Christ is of his seed; and that Christ did reign, is not in contradiction to the prophecy; for He did not reign with worldly honours, as He said, My kingdom is not of this world. (John 18:36.)
d. AD 420JeromePost-NiceneSourceCommentary on Matthew
(Verse 12 and following) And after the Babylonian exile, Jechonias fathered Salathiel. Salathiel fathered Zorobabel. Zorobabel fathered Abiud. Abiud fathered Eliacim. Eliacim fathered Azor. Azor fathered Sadoc. Sadoc fathered Achim. Achim fathered Eliud. Eliud fathered Eleazar. Eleazar fathered Matthan. Matthan fathered Jacob. If we were to place Jechonias at the end of the first fourteen generations, in the next there would not be fourteen but thirteen. Therefore, let us know that Jeconiah is the same person as Joachim, the former being the father and the latter being the son; the former is written with 'c' and 'm', while the latter is written with 'ch' and 'n'. This confusion arose due to errors of the scribes and the passage of time among both the Greeks and the Latins.
AD 500Pseudo-Chrysostomas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(ubi sup.) After the carrying away, he sets Jeconiah again, as now become a private person.

Concerning Salathiell, we have read nothing either good or bad, but we suppose him to have been a holy man, and in the captivity to have constantly besought God in behalf of afflicted Israel, and that hence he was named Salathiel, 'the petition of Godm.' Salathiel begot Zorobabel, which is interpreted, 'flowing postponed,' or, 'of the confusion,' or here, 'the doctor of Babylonn.' I have read, but know not whether it be true, that both the priestly line and the royal line were united in Zorobabel; and that it was through him that the children of Israel returned into their own country. For that in a disputation held between three, of whom Zorobabel was one, each defending his own opinion, Zorobabel's sentence, that Truth was the strongest thing, prevailed; and that for this Darius granted him that the children of Israel should return to their country; and therefore after this providence of God, he was rightly called Zorobabel, 'the doctor of Babylon.' For what doctrine greater than to show that Truth is the mistress of all things?
d. AD 533Remigius of Rheimsas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
He is also Zorobabel, that is, 'the master of confusion,' according to that, Your Master eateth with publicans and sinners. (Matt. 9:11.) He is Abiud, that is, 'He is my Father,' according to that, I and the Father are One. (John 10:30.) He is also Eliacimo, that is, 'God the Reviver,' according to that, I will revive him again in the last day. (John 6:54.) He is also Azor, that is, 'aided,' according to that, He who sent Me is with Me. (John 8:29.) He is also Sadoch, that is, 'the just,' or, 'the justified,' according to that, He was delivered, the just for the unjust. (1 Pet. 3:18.) He is also Achim, that is, 'my brother is He,' according to that, Whoso doeth the will of My Father, he is My brother. (Matt. 12:50.) He is also Eliud, that is, 'He is my God,' according to that, My Lord, and my God. (John 20:28.)

He is also Jacob, 'that supplanteth,' for not only hath He supplanted the Devil, but hath given His power to His faithful people; as, Behold I have given you power to tread upon serpents. (Luke 10:19.) He is also Joseph, that is, 'adding,' according to that, I came that they might have life, and that they might have it abundantly. (John 10:10.)
d. AD 856Rabanus Maurusas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Early MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
But let us see what moral signification these names contain. After Jeconias, which means 'the preparation of the Lord,' follows Salathiel, i. e. 'God is my petition,' for he who is rightly prepared, prays not but of God. Again, he becomes Zorobabel, 'the master of Babylon,' that is, of the men of the earth, whom he makes to know concerning God, that He is their Father, which is signified in Abiud. Then that people rise again from their vices, whence follows Eliacim, 'the resurrection;' and thence rise to good works, which is Azor, and becomes Sadoch, i. e. 'righteous;' and then they are taught the love of their neighbour. He is my brother, which is signified in Achim; and through love to God he says of Him, 'My God,' which Eliud signifies. Then follows Eleazar, i. e. 'God is my helper;' he recognizes God as his helper. But whereto he tends is shown in Matthan, which is interpreted 'gift,' or 'giving;' for he looks to God as his benefactor; and as he wrestled with and overcame his vices in the beginning, so he does in the end of life, which belongs to Jacob, and thus he reaches Joseph, that is, 'The increase of virtues.'
AD 1150Glossa Ordinariaas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
Morally; After David follows Solomon, which is interpreted, 'peaceful.' For one then becomes peaceful, when unlawful motions being composed, and being as it were already set in the everlasting rest, he serves God, and turns others to Him. Then follows Roboam, that is 'the breadth of the people.' For when there is no longer any thing to overcome within himself, it behoves a man to look abroad to others, and to draw with him the people of God to heavenly things. Next is Abias, that is, 'the Lord Father,' for these things premised, He may proclaim Himself the Son of God, and then He will be Asa, that is, 'raising up,' and will ascend to His Father from virtue to virtue: and He will become Josaphat, that is, 'judging,' for He will judge others, and will be judged of none. Thus he becomes Joram, that is, 'lofty,' as it were dwelling on high; and is made Oziah, that is, 'the strong One of the Lord,' as attributing all his strength to God, and persevering in his path. Then follows Jotham, that is, 'perfect,' for he groweth daily to greater perfection. And thus he becomes Ahaz, that is, 'embracing,' for by obedience knowledge is increased according to that, They have proclaimed the worship of the Lord, and have understood His doings. Then follows Ezekias, that is, 'the Lord is strong,' because he understands that God is strong, and so turning to His love, he becomes Manasses, 'forgetful,' because he gives up as forgotten all worldly things; and is made thereby Amon, that is, 'faithful,' for whoso despises all temporal things, defrauds no man of his goods. Thus he is made Josias, that is, 'in certain hope of the Lord's salvation;' for Josias is interpreted 'the salvation of the Lord.'
12-15. And after they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; and Salathiel begat Zorobabel; and Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor; and Azor begat Sadoc; and Sadoc begat Achim; and Achim begat Eliud; and Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat Matthan; and Matthan begat Jacob.

But this seems to contradict the genealogy which is read in Chronicles (1 Chron. 3:17.). For there it is said, that Jeconias begot Salathiel and Phadaias, and Phadaias begot Zorobabel, and Zorobabel Mosollah, Ananias, and Salomith their sister. But we know that many parts of the Chronicles have been corrupted by time, and error of transcribers. Hence come many and controverted questions of genealogies which the Apostle bids us avoid (1 Tim. 1:4.). Or it may be said, that Salathiel and Phadaias are the same man under two different names. Or that Salathiel and Phadaias were brothers, and both had sons of the same name, and that the writer of the history followed the genealogy of Zorobabel, the son of Salathiel. From Abiud down to Joseph, no history is found in the Chronicles; but we read that the Hebrews had many other annals, which were called the Words of the Days, of which much was burned by Herod, who was a foreigner, in order to confound the descent of the royal line. And perhaps Joseph had read in them the names of his ancestors, or knew them from some other source. And thus the Evangelist could learn the succession of this genealogy. It should be noted, that the first Jeconiah is called the resurrection of the Lord, the second, the preparation of the Lord. Both are very applicable to the Lord Christ, who declares, I am the resurrection, and the life; (John 11:25.) and, I go to prepare a place for you. (John 14:2.) Salathiel, i. e. 'the Lord is my petition,' is suitable to Him who said, Holy Father, keep them whom Thou hast given Me. (John 17:11.)

He is also Eleazar, i. e. 'God is my helper,' as in the seventeenth Psalm, My God, my helper. He is also Mathan, that is, 'giving,' or, 'given,' for, He gave gifts for men; (Eph. 4:8.) and, God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son. (John 3:16.)
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying Matthew 1:13 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8