Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
But I say unto you, That Elias is indeed come, and they have done unto him whatsoever they listed, as it is written of him.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
But G235 I say G3004 unto you G5213, That G3754 Elias G2243 is G2064 indeed G2532 come G2064, and G2532 they have done G4160 unto him G846 whatsoever G3745 they listed G2309, as G2531 it is written G1125 of G1909 him G846.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
There's more to it: I tell you that Eliyahu has come, and they did whatever they pleased to him, just as the Tanakh says about him."
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
But I tell you that Elijah has indeed come, and they have done to him whatever they wished, just as it is written about him.”
Ask
American Standard Version
But I say unto you, that Elijah is come, and they have also done unto him whatsoever they would, even as it is written of him.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
But I tell you that Elijah has come, and they have also done to him whatever they wanted to, even as it is written about him.”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
But I say vnto you, that Elias is come, (and they haue done vnto him whatsoeuer they would) as it is written of him.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
But I say to you, That also Elijah hath come, and they did to him what they willed, as it hath been written of him.'
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 24,552 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Jesus clarifies to His disciples that John the Baptist is the fulfillment of the prophecy concerning Elijah's return, and tragically, just as the Son of Man is destined to suffer, so too did John endure the arbitrary will and persecution of those in power, aligning with what was foretold about him in the broader prophetic narrative of suffering.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This declaration by Jesus in Mark 9:13 immediately follows the profound event of the Transfiguration on the mountain, where Peter, James, and John witnessed Jesus glorified alongside Moses and Elijah (Mark 9:2-8). As they descended, the disciples, still processing the miraculous vision, questioned Jesus about the scribal teaching that Elijah must come before the Messiah (Mark 9:11). This question is rooted in Old Testament prophecy, particularly Malachi 4:5-6, which spoke of Elijah's return to prepare the way for the Lord. Jesus' response in Mark 9:12-13 directly addresses their theological dilemma, confirming the fulfillment of prophecy while also linking Elijah's suffering to His own impending Passion. The preceding verse (Mark 9:12) explicitly states that the Son of Man must suffer many things, setting the stage for the parallel suffering of Elijah (John the Baptist).
  • Historical & Cultural Context: First-century Jewish society held a strong expectation of Elijah's return, based on the prophecy in Malachi 4:5-6. This expectation was deeply ingrained in their eschatological hopes, believing Elijah would be the herald of the Messiah, preparing the people for His arrival. Many believed Elijah would literally reappear. The scribes, as interpreters of the Law and Prophets, taught this doctrine widely. John the Baptist's ministry, characterized by his ascetic lifestyle, wilderness preaching, and call to repentance, bore striking resemblances to the ancient prophet Elijah (2 Kings 1:8). However, his rejection by the religious authorities and his violent death at the hands of Herod Antipas (Mark 6:14-29) presented a challenge to the traditional understanding of Elijah's glorious return. Jesus' statement reinterprets this expectation, revealing that the "coming" was not a literal reappearance but a spiritual fulfillment through John, and that this fulfillment, like the Messiah's, involved suffering.
  • Key Themes: This verse contributes significantly to several key themes within Mark's Gospel and broader biblical theology. Firstly, it underscores the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy, demonstrating God's faithfulness to His word, even when that fulfillment takes an unexpected or unconventional form (Malachi 4:5-6). Secondly, it clarifies the identity and role of John the Baptist as the divinely appointed forerunner of the Messiah, operating in the spirit and power of Elijah (Luke 1:17). John's ministry was essential in preparing the hearts of the people for Jesus. Thirdly, and perhaps most poignantly, the verse highlights the theme of suffering as a necessary component of God's redemptive plan. By linking John's persecution and death to the "whatsoever they listed" and connecting it to the Son of Man's destined suffering (Mark 9:12), Jesus reveals a pattern of rejection and hardship for God's messengers, culminating in His own atoning death. This theme challenges the disciples' (and our) expectations of a triumphant, glorious Messiah who would not suffer.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Elias (Greek, Hēlías', G2243): This word directly refers to the Old Testament prophet Elijah, whose return was prophesied in Malachi 4:5. In this context, Jesus identifies John the Baptist as the spiritual fulfillment of this prophecy, indicating that John came "in the spirit and power of Elijah" (Luke 1:17). The use of "Elias" here confirms the disciples' understanding of the prophecy while reorienting their perception of its fulfillment.
  • come (Greek, érchomai', G2064): This verb signifies arrival or appearance. Jesus' emphatic declaration that "Elias is indeed come" (using the perfect tense in Greek, indicating a completed action with ongoing results) underscores the certainty and reality of John's ministry as the prophesied forerunner. It's not a future event but a past and present reality that the disciples (and the Jewish leaders) needed to recognize.
  • listed (Greek, thélō', G2309): Derived from a verb meaning "to determine, choose, or prefer," this word highlights the arbitrary and malicious will of those who persecuted John the Baptist. It implies a deliberate, unconstrained desire or whim that led to John's imprisonment and execution (Mark 6:14-29). This stands in stark contrast to God's sovereign will, emphasizing the human agency in rejecting God's messenger.
  • written (Greek, gráphō', G1125): This verb means "to write" or "to describe." Jesus' statement "as it is written of him" points to the prophetic nature of John's suffering. While the Old Testament explicitly foretold Elijah's coming (Malachi 4:5), it did not explicitly detail his suffering in the same way it did for the Messiah. However, the broader prophetic narrative of suffering servants and rejected prophets (Isaiah 53; Jeremiah 20) provides a thematic precedent, suggesting that the suffering of God's messengers is implicitly part of the divine plan for redemption.

Verse Breakdown

  • "But I say unto you,": Jesus introduces a direct and authoritative statement, contrasting His teaching with the scribal interpretation that Elijah must still come. This phrase emphasizes His divine authority to interpret prophecy and reveal truth, setting the stage for a crucial clarification.
  • "That Elias is indeed come,": This clause is Jesus' definitive affirmation that the prophecy of Elijah's return has already been fulfilled in the person and ministry of John the Baptist. The use of "indeed" (Greek kai, G2532, also meaning "also" or "even") adds emphasis, confirming the reality of John's role as the prophesied forerunner, despite his humble appearance and tragic end.
  • "and they have done unto him whatsoever they listed,": This somber statement refers to the persecution and ultimate execution of John the Baptist. "Whatsoever they listed" (from G2309 thélō) signifies that John was subjected to the arbitrary will, desires, and malicious whims of human authorities, particularly Herod Antipas and Herodias (Mark 6:14-29). This highlights the human rejection of God's messenger and the suffering that often accompanies prophetic ministry.
  • "as it is written of him.": This concluding phrase asserts that John's suffering and fate were not random or accidental but were, in some sense, part of God's overarching redemptive plan, foreshadowed or implicitly present in the prophetic scriptures. While no single Old Testament verse explicitly details Elijah's suffering in the same way it does for the Messiah, the pattern of rejected prophets and suffering servants throughout the Old Testament implicitly "writes" this reality into the divine narrative, demonstrating that suffering is often intertwined with faithfulness to God's calling.

Literary Devices

Mark 9:13 employs several significant literary devices. Allusion is central, as Jesus directly alludes to the Old Testament prophecy of Elijah's return, particularly from Malachi 4:5-6. This serves to connect the present events to the broader sweep of salvation history and prophetic fulfillment. There is also profound Irony in Jesus' statement. The disciples expected a glorious, universally recognized return of Elijah, yet Jesus reveals that Elijah (John the Baptist) came in humility and suffered a violent death at the hands of human authorities. This subverts their expectations and highlights the unexpected ways in which God's plan unfolds. Furthermore, the verse exhibits Foreshadowing, as John the Baptist's suffering and rejection serve as a poignant precursor to Jesus' own impending Passion, which Jesus explicitly mentions in the preceding verse (Mark 9:12). The parallel between the suffering of the forerunner and the suffering of the Messiah underscores a consistent theme of rejection for God's chosen ones.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Mark 9:13 profoundly impacts our understanding of divine prophecy, the nature of God's messengers, and the role of suffering in salvation history. It reveals that God's fulfillment of prophecy is not always literal or according to human expectation, but often spiritual and transformative, requiring discernment. John the Baptist, as the "Elijah who was to come," embodies the final Old Testament prophet, bridging the covenants and preparing the way for Christ. His rejection and suffering underscore a consistent biblical theme: those who faithfully proclaim God's truth often face opposition, mirroring the ultimate suffering of the Messiah. This verse challenges believers to look beyond superficial appearances and worldly success to recognize God's hand at work, even in humble and painful circumstances, affirming that suffering for righteousness is a path often trodden by God's faithful.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Mark 9:13 offers profound lessons for contemporary believers, challenging our perceptions of divine activity and the nature of discipleship. It calls us to recognize that God's plans often unfold in ways that defy human expectations, appearing in humility, suffering, or through unexpected individuals. Just as the disciples struggled to reconcile the scribal teaching of Elijah's glorious return with John the Baptist's humble and tragic end, we too must guard against rigid preconceptions that might prevent us from discerning God's work in our midst. This verse also serves as a stark reminder that faithfulness to God's calling, especially in prophetic witness, often invites opposition and hardship. John the Baptist's suffering at the hands of those who "listed" to do him harm is a powerful testament to the cost of truth-telling in a fallen world. For us, this means embracing the possibility of discomfort, rejection, or even persecution when we stand for Christ and His kingdom. It encourages us to persevere in our witness, knowing that our suffering aligns us with the pattern of Christ and His forerunners, and that God's ultimate purposes will prevail, regardless of human resistance. We are called to embody a spirit of discernment, humility, and courageous faithfulness, even when the path leads through difficulty.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what ways might my own expectations or cultural assumptions prevent me from recognizing God's work in unexpected places or through unexpected people today?
  • How does the suffering of John the Baptist, and its connection to Jesus' own suffering, challenge my understanding of what it means to follow Christ faithfully?
  • What "lists" or arbitrary wills of the world might I be tempted to succumb to, rather than standing firm in God's truth, even if it brings opposition?
  • How can I cultivate a spirit of discernment to recognize God's messengers and His unfolding plan, even when it doesn't fit my preconceived notions of glory or success?

FAQ

Was John the Baptist literally Elijah reborn?

Answer: No, Jesus' statement that "Elias is indeed come" does not mean John the Baptist was a literal reincarnation of the Old Testament prophet Elijah. Jewish theology did not typically embrace the concept of reincarnation. Instead, Jesus means that John came "in the spirit and power of Elijah" (Luke 1:17), fulfilling the prophetic role of Elijah as the forerunner to the Messiah. John himself denied being Elijah when directly asked (John 1:21), indicating he was not the historical Elijah. However, he understood his role to be the one preparing the way for the Lord, as Malachi prophesied (Malachi 3:1). Jesus' identification of John as Elijah is a theological statement about John's prophetic office and mission, not his literal identity.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Mark 9:13, while primarily identifying John the Baptist as the fulfillment of the Elijah prophecy, points profoundly to Christ in its emphasis on suffering and divine purpose. John's role as the forerunner, who came in the "spirit and power of Elias" (Luke 1:17), was to prepare the way for the Lord, Jesus Christ, by calling people to repentance (Mark 1:4). The tragic reality that "they have done unto him whatsoever they listed" directly foreshadows the greater suffering and rejection that Jesus Himself would endure. Just as John, the messenger, was persecuted and killed by human will (Mark 6:14-29), so too would the Messiah, the very Son of God, be subjected to the will of sinful men, leading to His crucifixion (Mark 15:1-39). This verse subtly highlights the paradox of God's redemptive plan: the path to ultimate glory and salvation for humanity would come not through worldly power or immediate triumph, but through the suffering and sacrificial death of both the forerunner and the Christ, "as it is written of him" (Isaiah 53:5-7), ultimately leading to resurrection and victory over sin and death (Romans 6:9-10). Thus, John's suffering serves as a prophetic mirror, reflecting the greater suffering of the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29).

Copy as

Commentary on Mark 9 verses 1–13

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

Here is, I. A prediction of Christ's kingdom now near approaching, Mar 9:1. That which is foretold, is, 1. That the kingdom of God would come, and would come so as to be seen: the kingdom of the Messiah shall be set up in the world by the utter destruction of the Jewish polity, which stood in the way of it; this was the restoring of the kingdom of God among men, which had been in a manner lost by the woeful degeneracy both of Jews and Gentiles. 2. That it would come with power, so as to make its own way, and bear down the opposition that was given to it. It came with power, when vengeance was taken on the Jews for crucifying Christ, and when it conquered the idolatry of the Gentile world. 3. That it would come while some now present were alive; There are some standing here, that shall not taste of death, till they see it; this speaks the same with Mat 24:34, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled. Those that were standing here with Christ, should see it, when the others could not discern it to be the kingdom of God, for it came not with observation.

II. A specimen of that kingdom in the transfiguration of Christ, six days after Christ spoke that prediction. He had begun to give notice to his disciples of his death and sufferings; and, to prevent their offence at that, he gives them this glimpse of his glory, to show that his sufferings were voluntary, and what a virtue the dignity and glory of his person would put into them, and to prevent the offence of the cross.

1.It was on the top of a high mountain, like the converse Moses had with God, which was on the top of mount Sinai, and his prospect of Canaan from the top of mount Pisgah. Tradition saith, It was on the top of the mount Tabor that Christ was transfigured; and if so, the scripture was fulfilled, Tabor and Hermon shall rejoice in thy name, Psa 89:12. Dr. Lightfoot, observing that the last place where we find Christ was in the coasts of Caesarea-Philippi, which was far from mount Tabor, rather thinks it was a high mountain which Josephus speaks of, near Caesarea.

2.The witnesses of it were Peter, James, and John; these were the three that were to bear record on earth, answering to Moses, Elias, and the voice from heaven, the three that were to bear record from above. Christ did not take all the disciples with him, because the thing was to be kept very private. As there are distinguishing favours which are given to disciples and not to the world, so there are to some disciples and not to others. All the saints are a people near to Christ, but some lie in his bosom. James was the first of all the twelve that died for Christ, and John survived them all, to be the last eyewitness of this glory; he bore record (Joh 1:14); We saw his glory: and so did Peter, Pe2 1:16-18.

3.The manner of it; He was transfigured before them; he appeared in another manner than he used to do. This was a change of the accidents, the substance remaining the same, and it was a miracle. But transubstantiation, the change of the substance, all the accidents remaining the same, is not a miracle, but a fraud and imposture, such a work as Christ never wrought. See what a great change human bodies are capable of, when God is pleased to put an honour upon them, as he will upon the bodies of the saints, at the resurrection. He was transfigured before them; the change, it is probable, was gradual, from glory to glory, so that the disciples, who had their eye upon him all the while, had the clearest and most certain evidence they could have, that this glorious appearance was no other than the blessed Jesus himself, and there was no illusion in it. John seems to refer to this (Jo1 1:1), when he speaks of the word of life, as that which they had seen with their eyes, and looked upon. His raiment became shining; so that, though probably, it was sad-coloured, if not black, yet it was now exceeding white as snow, beyond what the fuller's art could do toward whitening it.

4.His companions in this glory were Moses and Elias (Mar 9:4); They appeared talking with him, not to teach him, but to testify to him, and to be taught by him; by which it appears that there are converse and intercourse between glorified saints, they have ways of talking one with another, which we understand not. Moses and Elias lived at a great distance of time one from another, but that breaks no squares in heaven, where the first shall be last, and the last first, that is, all one in Christ.

5.The great delight that the disciples took in seeing this sight, and hearing this discourse, is expressed by Peter, the mouth of the rest; He said, Master, it is good for us to be here, Mar 9:5. Though Christ was transfigured, and was in discourse with Moses and Elias, yet he gave Peter leave to speak to him, and to be as free with him as he used to be. Note, Our Lord Jesus, in his exaltation and glory, doth not at all abate of his condescending kindness to his people. Many, when they are in their greatness, oblige their friends to keep their distance; but even to the glorified Jesus true believers have access with boldness, and freedom of speech with him. Even in this heavenly discourse there was room for Peter to put in a word; and this is it, "Lord, it is good to be here, it is good for us to be here; here let us make tabernacles; let this be our rest for ever." Note, Gracious souls reckon it good to be in communion with Christ, good to be near him, good to be in the mount with him, though it be a cold and solitary place; it is good to be here retired from the world, and alone with Christ: and if it is good to be with Christ transfigured only upon a mountain with Moses and Elias, how good it will be to be with Christ glorified in heaven with all the saints! But observe, While Peter was for staying here, he forgot what need there was of the presence of Christ, and the preaching of his apostles, among the people. At this very time, the other disciples wanted them greatly, Mar 9:14. Note, When it is well with us, we are apt to be mindless of others, and in the fulness of our enjoyments to forget the necessities of our brethren; it was a weakness in Peter to prefer private communion with God before public usefulness. Paul is willing to abide in the flesh, rather than depart to the mountain of glory (though that be far better), when he sees it needful for the church, Phi 1:24, Phi 1:25. Peter talked of making three distinct tabernacles for Moses, Elias, and Christ, which was not well-contrived; for such a perfect harmony there is between the law, the prophets, and the gospel, that one tabernacle will hold them all; they dwell together in unity. But whatever was incongruous in what he said, he may be excused, for they were all sore afraid; and he, for his part, wist not what to say (Mar 9:6), not knowing what would be the end thereof.

6.The voice that came from heaven, was an attestation of Christ's mediatorship, Mar 9:7. There was a cloud that overshadowed them, and was a shelter to them. Peter had talked of making tabernacles for Christ and his friends; but while he yet spoke, see how his project was superseded; this cloud was unto them instead of tabernacles for their shelter (Isa 4:5); while he spoke of his tabernacles, God created his tabernacle not made with hands. Now out of this cloud (which was but a shade to the excellent glory Peter speaks of, whence this voice came) it was said, This is my beloved Son, hear him. God owns him, and accepts him, as his beloved Son, and is ready to accept of us in him; we must then own and accept him as our beloved Saviour, and must give up ourselves to be ruled by him.

7.The vision, being designed only to introduce the voice, when that was delivered, disappeared (Mar 9:8); Suddenly when they had looked round about, as men amazed to see where they were, all was gone, they saw no man any more. Elias and Moses were vanished out of sight, and Jesus only remained with them, and he not transfigured, but as he used to be. Note, Christ doth not leave the soul, when extraordinary joys and comforts leave it. Though more sensible and ravishing communications may be withdrawn, Christ's disciples have, and shall have, his ordinary presence with them always, even to the end of the world, and that is it we must depend upon. Let us thank God for daily bread and not expect a continual feast on this side of heaven.

8.We have here the discourse between Christ and his disciples, as they came down from the mount.

(1.)He charged them to keep this matter very private, till he was risen from the dead, which would complete the proof of his divine mission, and then this must be produced with the rest of the evidence, Mar 9:9. And besides, he, being now in a state of humiliation, would haves nothing publicly taken notice of, that might be seen disagreeable to such a state; for to that he would in every thing accommodate himself. This enjoining of silence to the disciples, would likewise be of use to them, to prevent their boasting of the intimacy they were admitted to, that they might not be puffed up with the abundance of the revelations. It is a mortification to a man, to be tied up from telling of his advancements, and may help to hide pride from him.

(2.)The disciples were at a loss what the rising from the dead should mean; they could not form any notion of the Messiah's dying (Luk 18:34), and therefore were willing to think that the rising he speaks of, was figurative, his rising from his present mean and low estate to the dignity and dominion they were in expectation of. But if so, here is another thing that embarrasses them (Mar 9:11); Why say the Scribes, that before the appearing of the Messiah in his glory, according to the order settled in the prophecies of the Old Testament, Elias must first come? But Elias was gone, and Moses too. Now that which raised this difficulty, was, the scribes taught them to expect the person of Elias, whereas the prophecy intended one in the spirit and power of Elias. Note, The misunderstanding of scripture is a great prejudice to the entertainment of truth.

(3.)Christ gave them a key to the prophecy concerning Elias (Mar 9:12, Mar 9:13); "It is indeed prophesied that Elias will come, and will restore all things, and set them to rights; and (though you will not understand it) it is also prophesied of the Son of man, that he must suffer many things, and be set at nought, must be a reproach of men, and despised of the people: and though the scribes do not tell you so, the scriptures do, and you have as much reason to expect that as the other, and should not make so strange of it; but as to Elias, I tell you he is come; and if you consider a little, you will understand whom I mean, it is one to whom they have done whatsoever they listed;" which was very applicable to the ill usage they had given John Baptist. Many of the ancients, and the Popish writers generally, think, that besides the coming of John Baptist in the spirit of Elias, himself in his own person is to be expected, with Enoch, before the second appearance of Christ, wherein the prophecy of Malachi will have a more full accomplishment than it had in John Baptist. But it is groundless fancy; the true Elias, as well as the true Messiah promised, is come, and we are to look for no other. These words as it is written of him, refer not to their doing to him whatever they listed (that comes in a parenthesis), but only to his coming. He is come, and hath been, and done, according as was written of him.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–13. Public domain.
Copy as
Pseudo-Jerome (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
This, which is peculiar to Mark, means, that when death shall have been swallowed up in victory, we shall have no memory for the former things. It goes on, And they asked him, saying, Why say the Scribes that Elias must first come.
John Chrysostom (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 407
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(Hom in Matt. 56) Where He not only orders them to be silent, but mentioning His Passion, He implies the cause why they were to be silent.

(non occ.) The design of the disciples in asking this question seems to me to be this. We indeed have seen Elias with Thee, and have seen Thee before seeing Elias, but the Scribes say that Elias cometh first; we therefore believe that they have lied.

(Hom. in Matt. 57) But what Christ answered to this, is seen by what follows, And he answered and told them, Elias verily cometh first, and restoreth all things; in which He shows that Elias will come before His second advent. For the Scriptures declare two advents of Christ, namely, one which has taken place, and another which is to come; but the Lord asserts that Elias is the forerunner of the second advent.

(ubi sup.) Now as the Lord asserted that Elias was to be the forerunner of the second advent, so consequently He asserted that John was the forerunner of the first; wherefore He subjoins, But I say unto you, that Elias is indeed come.
John ChrysostomAD 407
GOSPEL OF ST MATTHEW, HOMILY 57.1
Christ called John Elijah, not because he was Elijah, but because he was fulfilling the ministry of that prophet.
Pseudo-Chrysostom (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 500
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(Vict. Ant. e Cat. in Marc.) But they, being ignorant of the mystery of the resurrection, took hold of that saying, and disputed one with another; wherefore there follows, And they kept that saying with themselves, questioning one with another what the rising from the dead should, mean.

(Vict. Ant. e Cat. in Marc.) Or else, the disciples asked Jesus, how it was written that the Son of man must suffer? Now in answer to this, He says, As John came in the likeness of Elias, and they evil intreated him, so according to the Scriptures must the Son of man suffer.
Bede (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 735
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(ubi sup.) Or thus; the disciples thought that the change which they had seen in Him in the mount, was His transformation to glory; and they say, If Thou hast already come in glory, wherefore doth not Thy forerunner appear? chiefly because they had seen Elias go away.

(ubi sup.) Again, He will restore all things, that is to say, those things which Malachi points out, saying, Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet, and he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers; (Mal. 4:5, 6) he will yield up also to death that debt, which by his prolonged life he has delayed to render.

(ubi sup.) Or this, And how it is written: that is, in the same way as the prophets have written many things in various places concerning the Passion of Christ, Elias also, when he comes, is to suffer many things, and to be despised by the wicked.
BedeAD 735
On the Gospel of Mark
But I say to you, that Elias also came, and they did to him whatever they wanted, as it is written of him. He who is to come in the second advent of the Savior in bodily form, now came through John in spirit and power. They did to him whatever they wanted, that is they despised him, and beheaded him.
Theophylact of Ohrid (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 1107
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Which He did lest men should be offended, hearing such glorious things of Him Whom they were about to see crucified. It was not therefore fitting to say such things of Christ before He suffered, but after His resurrection they were likely to be believed.

Now the Lord puts this forward to oppose the notion of the Pharisees, who held that Elias was the forerunner of the first advent, showing that it led them to a false conclusion; wherefore he subjoins, And how it is written of the Son of man, that he must suffer many things, and be set at nought. As if He had said, When Elias the Tishbite cometh, he will pacify the Jews, and will bring them to the faith, and thus be the forerunner of the second advent. If then Elias is the forerunner of the first advent, how is it written that the Son of man must suffer? One of these two things therefore will follow; either that Elias is not the forerunner of the first advent, and thus the Scripture will be true; or that he is the forerunner of the first advent, and then the Scriptures will not be true, which say that Christ must suffer; for Elias must restore all things, in which case there will not be an unbelieving Jew, but all, whosoever hear him, must believe on his preaching.

For again, John rebuked vice, and was a zealous man, and a hermit like Elias; but they heard him not, as they will hear Elias, but killed him in wicked sport, and cut off his head; wherefore there follows, And they have done unto him whatsoever they listed, as it is written of him.
Glossa Ordinaria (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 1274
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(non in Gloss. sed ap. Chrys ubi sup.) He calls John Elias, not because he was Elias in person, but because he fulfilled the ministry of Elias; for as the latter will be the forerunner of the second advent, so the former has been that of the first.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Mark 9:13 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.