Now there were seven brethren: and the first took a wife, and dying left no seed.
Now there were {G2258} seven {G2033} brethren {G80}: and {G2532} the first {G4413} took {G2983} a wife {G1135}, and {G2532} dying {G599} left {G863} no {G3756} seed {G4690}.
There were seven brothers. The first one took a wife, and when he died, he left no children.
Now there were seven brothers. The first one married and died, leaving no children.
There were seven brethren: and the first took a wife, and dying left no seed;
-
Matthew 22:25
Now there were with us seven brethren: and the first, when he had married a wife, deceased, and, having no issue, left his wife unto his brother: -
Matthew 22:28
Therefore in the resurrection whose wife shall she be of the seven? for they all had her. -
Luke 20:29
There were therefore seven brethren: and the first took a wife, and died without children. -
Luke 20:33
Therefore in the resurrection whose wife of them is she? for seven had her to wife.
Mark 12:20 is a foundational verse within a significant debate between Jesus and the Sadducees, recorded in Mark 12:18-27. This verse begins the Sadducees' convoluted hypothetical scenario designed to challenge Jesus' belief in the resurrection of the dead.
Context
The Sadducees were a prominent Jewish sect during Jesus' time, known for their strict adherence to the written Torah (the first five books of the Old Testament) and their rejection of many doctrines held by the Pharisees, including the belief in a resurrection, angels, and spirits (Acts 23:8). In this passage, they approach Jesus with a question rooted in the Levirate marriage law (Deuteronomy 25:5-10). This law stipulated that if a man died childless, his brother was obligated to marry the widow to produce an heir for the deceased brother, ensuring the family line and inheritance continued.
Verse 20 introduces the first instance of their seven-brother hypothetical: "Now there were seven brethren: and the first took a wife, and dying left no seed." This sets up the premise for their absurd question about whose wife a woman would be in the resurrection if she had been married to multiple brothers in succession, all of whom died childless.
Key Themes
Linguistic Insights
The phrase "left no seed" (Greek: ouk aphelke sperma) is a direct reference to the lack of offspring. In ancient Israelite society, having children, especially male heirs, was of paramount importance for continuing the family name, inheriting property, and fulfilling God's promise of descendants. The absence of "seed" was considered a significant misfortune and was the specific condition that activated the Levirate marriage obligation according to Mosaic Law.
Practical Application
Understanding this verse helps us grasp the historical and cultural context surrounding Jesus' ministry. It reminds us that: