TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Mark 11:27–33. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
We have here Christ examined by the great Sanhedrim concerning his authority; for they claimed a power to call prophets to an account concerning their mission. They came to him when he was walking in the temple, not for his diversion, but teaching the people, first one company and then another. The Peripatetic philosophers were so called from the custom they had of walking when they taught. The cloisters, or piazzas, in the courts of the temple, were fitted for this purpose. The great men were vexed to see him followed and heard with attention, and therefore came to him with some solemnity, and did as it were arraign him at the bar with this question, By what authority doest thou these things? Mar 11:28. Now observe,
I.How they designed hereby to run him aground, and embarrass him.
If they could make it out before the people, that he had not a legal mission, that he was not duly ordained, though he was ever so well qualified, and preached ever so profitably and well, they would tell the people that they ought not to hear him. This they made the last refuge of an obstinate unbelief; because they were resolved not to receive his doctrine, they were resolved to find some flaw or other in his commission, and will conclude it invalid, if it be not produced and ratified in their court. Thus the Papists resolve their controversy with us very much into the mission of our ministers, and if they have but any pretence to overthrow that, they think they have gained their point, though we have the scripture ever so much on our side. But this is indeed a question, which all that act either as magistrates or ministers, ought to be furnished with a good answer to, and often put to themselves, By what authority do I these things? For how can men preach except they be sent? Or how can they act with comfort, or confidence, or hope of success, except they be authorized? Jer 23:32.
II.How he effectually ran them aground, and embarrassed them, with this question, "What are your thoughts concerning the baptism of John? Was it from heaven, or of men? By what authority did John preach, and baptize, and gather disciples? Answer me, Mar 11:30. Deal fairly and ingenuously, and give a categorical answer, one way or the other." By this resolve of their question into this, our Saviour intimates how near akin his doctrine and baptism were to John's; they had the same original, and the same design and tendency - to introduce the gospel kingdom. Christ might with the better grace put this question to them, because they had sent a committee of their own house to examine John, Joh 1:19. "Now," saith Christ, "what was the result of your enquiries concerning him?"
They knew what they thought of this question; they could not but think that John Baptist was a man sent of God. But the difficulty was, what they should say to it now. Men that oblige not themselves to speak as they think (which is a certain rule) cannot avoid perplexing themselves thus.
1.If they own the baptism of John to be from heaven, as really it was, they shame themselves; for Christ will presently turn it upon them, Why did ye not then believe him, and receive his baptism? They could not bear that Christ should say this, but they could bear it that their own consciences should say so, because they had an art of stifling and silencing them, and because what conscience said, though it might gall and grate them a little, would not shame them; and then they would do well enough, who looked no further than Saul's care, when he was convicted, Honour me now before this people, Sa1 15:30.
2.If they say, "It is of men, he was not sent of God, but his doctrine and baptism were inventions of his own," they expose themselves, the people will be ready to do them a mischief, or a least clamour upon them; for all men counted John that he was a prophet indeed, and therefore they could not bear that he should be reflected on. Note, There is a carnal slavish fear, which not only wicked subjects but wicked rulers likewise are liable to, which God makes use of as a means to keep the world in some order, and to suppress violence, that it shall not always grow up into a rod of wickedness. Now by this dilemma to which Christ brought them,
(1.)They were confounded and baffled, and forced to make a dishonourable retreat; to pretend ignorance - We cannot tell (and that was mortification enough to those proud men), but really to discover the greatest malice and wilfulness. What Christ did by his wisdom, we must labour to do by our well doing - put to silence the ignorance of foolish men, Pe1 2:15.
(2.)Christ came off with honour, and justified himself in refusing to give them an answer to their imperious demand; Neither tell I you by what authority I do these things. They did not deserve to be told; for it was plain that they contended not for truth, but victory; nor did he need to tell them, for the works which he did, told them plainly that he had authority from God to do what he did; since no man could do those miracles which he did unless God were with him. Let them wait but three or four days, and his resurrection shall tell them who gave him his authority, for by that he will be declared to be the Son of God with power, as by their rejecting of him, notwithstanding, they will be declared to be the enemies of God.
Historical interpretation
Four Centuries of Reception
4 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
They envied the Lamp, and were in the dark, wherefore it is said, I have ordained a lamp for mine anointed; his enemies will I clothe with shame. (Ps. 132:17, 18) There follows: And Jesus answering saith unto them, Neither do I tell you by what authority I do these things.
(ubi sup.) And indeed, when they say, By what authority doest thou these things, they doubt its being the power of God, and wish it to be understood that what He did was the devil's work. When they add also, Who gave thee this authority, they evidently deny that He is the Son of God, since they believe that He works miracles, not by His own but by another's power.
(ubi sup.) The Lord might indeed have confuted the cavils of his tempters by a direct answer, but prudently puts them a question, that they might be condemned either by their silence or their speaking, which is evident from what is added, And they reasoned with themselves, saying, If we shall say, From heaven; he will say, Why then did ye not believe him? As if He had said, He whom you confess to have had his prophecy from heaven bore testimony of Me, and ye have heard from him, by what authority I do these things. It goes on: But if we shall say, Of men; they feared the people. They saw then that whatever they answered, they should fall into a snare; fearing to be stoned, they feared still more the confession of the truth. Wherefore it goes on: And they answered and said unto Jesus, We cannot tell.
(ubi sup.) As if He had said, I will not tell you what I know, since ye will not confess what ye know. Further, we must observe that knowledge is hidden from those who seek it, principally for two reasons, namely, when he who seeks for it either has not sufficient capacity to understand what he seeks for, or when through contempt for the truth, or some other reason, he is unworthy of having that for which he seeks opened to him.
But Jesus answering said: "I will also ask you one thing, and you answer me, and I will tell you by what authority I do these things. The baptism of John, was it from heaven, or from men? Answer me." The Lord could have refuted the calumny of the tempters with an open answer, but he prudently asks, so that they may be condemned either by their silence or by their own decision.
They were angry with the Lord, for having cast out of the temple those who had made it a place of merchandize, and therefore they come up to Him, to question and tempt Him. Wherefore it is said: And they come again to Jerusalem: and as he was walking in the temple, there come to him the Chief Priests, and the Scribes, and the elders, and say unto him, By what authority doest thou these things? and who gave thee authority to do these things? As if they had said, Who art thou that doest these things? Dost thou make thyself a doctor, and ordain thyself Chief Priest?
Further, they said this, thinking to bring Him to judgment, so that if He said, by mine own power, they might lay hold upon Him; but if He said, by the power of another, they might make the people leave Him, for they believed Him to be God. But the Lord asks them concerning John, not without a reason, nor in a sophistical way, but because John had borne witness of Him. Wherefore there follows: And Jesus answered and said unto them, I will also ask of you one question, and answer me, and I will tell you by what authority I do these things. The baptism of John, was it from heaven, or of men? answer me.
Continue studying Mark 11:29 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Mark 11:29 captures a pivotal moment in Jesus' final week in Jerusalem, where He masterfully responds to the religious leaders' challenge to His authority. Instead of directly answering their accusatory demand, Jesus employs a brilliant rabbinic teaching method by posing a counter-question about the origin of John the Baptist's authority. This strategic move forces His interrogators into a dilemma, exposing their hypocrisy and revealing their true motives, while simultaneously asserting His own divine wisdom and control over the confrontation.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is situated within a highly confrontational sequence in Mark's Gospel, occurring immediately after Jesus' dramatic cleansing of the Temple in Mark 11:15-19 and the symbolic withering of the fig tree in Mark 11:20-25. These actions directly challenged the established religious order and its practices, prompting the chief priests, scribes, and elders to demand, "By what authority doest thou these things? and who gave thee this authority to do these things?" (Mark 11:28). Jesus' response in Mark 11:29 is not a direct answer but a strategic counter-question that turns the tables on His accusers, setting the stage for further parables and teachings that expose their spiritual blindness, such as the Parable of the Wicked Vinedressers in the following chapter.
Historical & Cultural Context
Jesus' interaction takes place in the Temple courts, the epicenter of Jewish religious and national life in Jerusalem. The religious leaders (chief priests, scribes, and elders) represented the Sanhedrin, the supreme Jewish governing council, and held significant religious and political power. Their question about Jesus' authority (Greek: exousia) was a formal challenge, aimed at discrediting Him and potentially accusing Him of blasphemy or sedition if His authority was not recognized by their institutions. Rabbinic tradition often involved answering a question with a question, particularly when the interrogator's motives were suspect or when a direct answer might be misconstrued. Jesus' use of this method was culturally astute, forcing His opponents to confront their own position regarding John the Baptist, a prophet widely revered by the people, thereby trapping them between popular opinion and their own institutional bias.
Key Themes
The central theme of Mark 11 and this specific verse is Divine Authority. The religious leaders' challenge directly questions the source and legitimacy of Jesus' power, particularly after His authoritative actions in the Temple. Jesus' counter-question about John the Baptist's baptism (Mark 11:30) implicitly links His own authority to a divine origin, much like John's, thereby asserting that His exousia comes from God, not from human institutions. Another prominent theme is Wisdom in Confrontation. Jesus consistently demonstrates divine wisdom in His encounters, often using parables, rhetorical questions, or paradoxes to expose the hearts and motives of His adversaries, as seen in His response here. This tactic highlights the Exposing of Hypocrisy, as the leaders' unwillingness to answer Jesus' question about John reveals their fear of the crowds and their prioritisation of self-preservation over acknowledging divine truth, a recurring motif throughout Jesus' ministry, for instance, in His denunciation of the scribes and Pharisees in Matthew 23.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
From ἀπό and κρίνω, meaning "to conclude for oneself, i.e. (by implication) to respond; by Hebraism... to begin to speak (where an address is expected)." This highlights Jesus' deliberate and strategic response, not merely a simple verbal reply but a carefully considered counter-move in a confrontational setting. It implies a considered judgment and a decisive turn in the dialogue.
From λέγω, meaning "something said (including the thought); by implication, a topic (subject of discourse), also reasoning (the mental faculty) or motive... specifically, (with the article in John) the Divine Expression (i.e. Christ)." In this context, it refers to a specific topic or matter of discourse that Jesus presents for their consideration, designed to expose their reasoning and motives rather than merely seeking information.
From ἔξεστι (in the sense of ability), meaning "privilege, i.e. (subjectively) force, capacity, competency, freedom, or (objectively) mastery... delegated influence." This word signifies not just permission, but an inherent right, power, and jurisdiction. The religious leaders questioned the source of Jesus' inherent right to act, and Jesus' counter-question about John's baptism implicitly challenged their recognition of divine authority, thereby turning their own query back on them.
Verse Breakdown
"And Jesus answered and said unto them,"
This phrase establishes Jesus' deliberate and direct engagement with His challengers. It signifies that His subsequent words are not impulsive but a measured, strategic response to their prior demand for His authority. The dual verbs "answered and said" emphasize the solemnity and intentionality of His address.
"I will also ask of you one question,"
Jesus immediately shifts the dynamic of the confrontation. By stating "I will also ask," He asserts His own prerogative to interrogate, placing the burden of response back onto the religious leaders. The "one question" is singular and focused, designed to be a decisive test of their integrity and spiritual discernment concerning John the Baptist.
"and answer me,"
This is a direct command, laying down a condition for further discourse. Jesus demands a clear and honest reply from them, highlighting that their willingness to answer His question will determine His willingness to answer theirs. This underscores the reciprocal nature of truth-seeking and the necessity of intellectual honesty.
"and I will tell you by what authority I do these things."
This clause presents Jesus' conditional promise. He offers to reveal the source of His authority, but only if they first demonstrate their own position on John's ministry. This effectively traps the religious leaders, as their answer regarding John would either alienate the people (if they denied John's divine origin) or acknowledge a divine source of authority outside their own control (if they affirmed it), which would then validate Jesus' similar claims.
Literary Devices
Mark 11:29 is rich in literary devices that underscore the intensity and strategic nature of this confrontation. The primary device is the Rhetorical Question, where Jesus poses a question not to gain information but to make a point and expose the true nature of His interrogators. This is a classic rabbinic teaching method, demonstrating Jesus' mastery of debate. There is also significant Irony at play: the religious leaders, who pride themselves on their wisdom and authority, are rendered speechless and unable to answer a seemingly simple question, while the one whose authority they question proves to be the true master of wisdom. The entire exchange functions as a Test or Trial, where Jesus turns the tables, making His accusers the ones on trial. This passage also exemplifies Confrontation, a recurring motif in Mark's Gospel where Jesus directly challenges the hypocrisy and spiritual blindness of the religious establishment.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Mark 11:29 profoundly illustrates the nature of divine authority versus human authority and the spiritual blindness that often accompanies institutional power. Jesus' refusal to directly answer the religious leaders' challenge, instead posing a counter-question about John the Baptist's authority, highlights that true authority originates from God, not from human recognition or ecclesiastical appointment. The leaders' dilemma—unable to affirm John's divine authority for fear of the people, and unwilling to deny it for fear of God—exposes their self-serving motives and their rejection of God's messengers. This passage serves as a powerful reminder that acknowledging God's truth often requires humility and a willingness to transcend human traditions and popular opinion, even when it is inconvenient or threatens one's established position.
Reflection and Application
Mark 11:29 offers profound insights into how believers can navigate challenges to their faith and convictions in a world often hostile to divine truth. Jesus models a response rooted in wisdom and discernment, rather than defensiveness or anger. When our faith or actions are questioned, we are called to respond with integrity and reliance on God's guidance, much like Jesus redirected the focus from His own person to the source of truth itself. This passage encourages us to cultivate spiritual discernment, enabling us to understand the underlying motives behind challenges and to respond in ways that honor God and expose hypocrisy, rather than merely engaging in fruitless arguments. It also serves as a poignant reminder that genuine spiritual authority is derived from God, not from human approval or institutional power, urging us to align our lives and beliefs with divine truth above all else, even when it means standing against popular opinion or established norms.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why did Jesus answer a question with a question instead of directly stating His authority?
Jesus' decision to answer a question with a question was a brilliant strategic and pedagogical move, common in rabbinic debate. Directly stating "My authority comes from God" would have immediately been dismissed or used as a charge of blasphemy by the religious leaders, who were already seeking to condemn Him. By posing a counter-question about John the Baptist's authority, Jesus forced His interrogators into a dilemma (Mark 11:31-32). If they admitted John's authority was from heaven, they would implicitly validate Jesus' similar claims, as John testified about Him (John 1:29-34). If they denied John's divine authority, they would alienate the people, who widely regarded John as a prophet (Mark 11:32). This tactic exposed their hypocrisy, their fear of man over God, and their unwillingness to acknowledge divine truth, thereby demonstrating Jesus' own divine wisdom and authority without explicitly declaring it in a way they could easily reject.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Mark 11:29, with Jesus' masterful handling of the religious leaders' challenge to His authority, points directly to His unique and inherent divine authority as the Christ. The leaders sought to confine Jesus' power within their human systems of accreditation, but Jesus' counter-question about John the Baptist's authority implicitly links His own exousia to a heavenly origin, just as John's was. This foreshadows the ultimate revelation of Jesus' authority not merely as a prophet or teacher, but as the Son of God, to whom all authority in heaven and on earth has been given (Matthew 28:18). His wisdom in this confrontation, exposing the hearts of His adversaries, is a manifestation of His divine omniscience and His role as the ultimate Judge, who knows the thoughts and intentions of all (Hebrews 4:12-13). Furthermore, Jesus' willingness to engage in such confrontations, even knowing they would lead to His crucifixion, demonstrates His ultimate authority over life and death, and His sovereign purpose to lay down His life and take it up again (John 10:18). Thus, this passage, while seemingly about a mere debate, subtly yet powerfully affirms Jesus' identity as the Christ, the one true source of all legitimate authority.