How he went into the house of God, and did take and eat the shewbread, and gave also to them that were with him; which it is not lawful to eat but for the priests alone?
How {G5613} he went {G1525} into {G1519} the house {G3624} of God {G2316}, and {G2532} did take {G2983} and {G2532} eat {G5315} the shewbread {G740}{G4286}, and {G2532} gave {G1325} also {G2532} to them that were with {G3326} him {G846}; which {G3739} it is {G1832} not {G3756} lawful {G1832} to eat {G5315} but for {G1508} the priests {G2409} alone {G3441}?
He entered the House of God and took and ate the Bread of the Presence" -- which no one is permitted to eat but the cohanim.
He entered the house of God, took the consecrated bread and gave it to his companions, and ate what is lawful only for the priests to eat.”
how he entered into the house of God, and took and ate the showbread, and gave also to them that were with him; which it is not lawful to eat save for the priests alone?
-
Leviticus 24:5
And thou shalt take fine flour, and bake twelve cakes thereof: two tenth deals shall be in one cake. -
Leviticus 24:9
And it shall be Aaron's and his sons'; and they shall eat it in the holy place: for it [is] most holy unto him of the offerings of the LORD made by fire by a perpetual statute.
In Luke 6:4, Jesus responds to the Pharisees' accusation that His disciples had broken the Sabbath by plucking grain (Luke 6:1-2). He defends their actions by citing an Old Testament event involving King David. This verse specifically quotes Jesus' rhetorical question to the Pharisees, recalling how David and his men ate the shewbread, which was reserved only for priests.
Historical and Cultural Context
The incident Jesus references is found in 1 Samuel 21:1-6. David, fleeing from King Saul and in dire need, sought food from Ahimelech the priest. The only bread available was the shewbread (also known as the "bread of the Presence" or "face bread"), which was consecrated bread placed weekly in the Tabernacle before the Lord. According to Mosaic Law, specifically Leviticus 24:5-9, only the priests were permitted to eat this bread after it was replaced with fresh loaves. By recalling this event, Jesus challenges the Pharisees' rigid interpretation of the law, suggesting that human necessity and mercy can, in certain circumstances, take precedence over ceremonial regulations.
Key Themes and Messages
Linguistic Insights
The term "shewbread" in the King James Version is a direct translation of the Hebrew lechem panim, meaning "bread of the face" or "bread of the presence," referring to its placement directly before God's presence in the Tabernacle/Temple. The Greek word used for "lawful" (exestin) implies what is permissible or proper according to divine or human law. Jesus' argument questions what truly constitutes "lawful" conduct when considering divine intent and human need.
Practical Application
This passage encourages believers to understand the spirit behind God's laws, not just the letter. While God's commands are important, they are ultimately for human flourishing and to reveal His character, which is full of mercy and compassion. It reminds us that genuine faith prioritizes love for God and neighbor over rigid, unbending adherence to rules, especially when human well-being is at stake. It also reinforces Jesus' ultimate authority as the interpreter and fulfiller of God's law.