Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
¶ And Pilate, when he had called together the chief priests and the rulers and the people,
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And G1161 Pilate G4091, when he had called together G4779 the chief priests G749 and G2532 the rulers G758 and G2532 the people G2992,
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Pilate summoned the head cohanim, the leaders and the people,
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Then Pilate called together the chief priests, the rulers, and the people,
Ask
American Standard Version
And Pilate called together the chief priests and the rulers and the people,
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Pilate called together the chief priests and the rulers and the people,
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then Pilate called together the hie Priests and the rulers, and the people,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And Pilate having called together the chief priests, and the rulers, and the people,
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem)
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
All Luke Sites (Levant)
All Luke Sites (Levant) View full PDF
All Luke Sites (Eastern Mediterranean)
All Luke Sites (Eastern Mediterranean) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 25,949 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Luke 23:13 marks a critical juncture in Jesus' trial, depicting Pontius Pilate's strategic move to convene a public assembly comprising the chief priests, the rulers, and the general populace. This gathering, following Pilate's initial interrogation and Jesus' brief appearance before Herod, underscores the Roman governor's attempt to publicly address the charges against Jesus and navigate the intense religious and political pressures exerted by the Jewish leadership and the agitated crowd. It sets the stage for Pilate's repeated declarations of Jesus' innocence and his efforts to release Him, ultimately highlighting the profound injustice of the crucifixion.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse immediately follows Jesus' return to Pilate after being sent to Herod Antipas, who also found no fault in Him (Luke 23:6-12). Pilate's summoning of the key parties—the Jewish religious authorities and the people—is a direct prelude to his public declaration of Jesus' innocence in Luke 23:14-15. This sequence highlights Pilate's repeated attempts to avoid condemning Jesus, contrasting sharply with the unwavering determination of the Jewish leaders to secure His death. The scene is part of the broader passion narrative in Luke, emphasizing Jesus' blamelessness even in the eyes of His accusers and the Roman authorities.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The trial of Jesus occurred during the Passover festival, a time of heightened religious and political tension in Jerusalem. Roman governors like Pilate were keenly aware of the potential for unrest, especially during Jewish feasts when large crowds gathered. The Jewish Sanhedrin, represented by the "chief priests and rulers," held significant religious and some civil authority under Roman rule but lacked the power to execute capital punishment without Roman approval. Pilate's decision to "call together" these groups was likely an attempt to manage public opinion, assert Roman authority, and perhaps find a public consensus or compromise, avoiding a direct confrontation that could escalate into a riot. His actions reflect the complex interplay of Roman governance, Jewish religious law, and the volatile political climate of first-century Judea.
  • Key Themes: Luke 23:13 contributes significantly to several overarching themes in Luke's Gospel. Firstly, it reinforces the theme of Jesus' Innocence, as Pilate, a Roman authority, is compelled to acknowledge His blamelessness, a point reiterated throughout the trial narrative (e.g., Luke 23:4). Secondly, it highlights the Opposition of the Jewish Leadership, showcasing their relentless and coordinated efforts to condemn Jesus, driven by envy and fear of His messianic claims and popular influence (Luke 19:47-48). Thirdly, the inclusion of "the people" underscores the theme of Mob Mentality and Public Pressure, demonstrating how easily public sentiment can be swayed by powerful figures, leading to unjust outcomes (foreshadowing their cry for crucifixion in Luke 23:23). Finally, it subtly introduces the theme of Divine Sovereignty working through human actions, even those marked by injustice, to fulfill God's redemptive plan.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Pilate (Greek, Pilâtos', G4091): This refers to Pontius Pilate, the Roman prefect (governor) of Judea from AD 26 to 36. His name, of Latin origin, means "close-pressed" or "firm," ironically contrasting with his indecisive and politically expedient actions during Jesus' trial. Luke's Gospel, like the other Gospels, portrays Pilate as a figure caught between his personal assessment of Jesus' innocence and the immense pressure from the Jewish authorities and the crowd, ultimately succumbing to the latter.
  • called together (Greek, synkaléō', G4779): This verb signifies a deliberate act of convoking or summoning an assembly. It implies a formal and intentional gathering initiated by Pilate, indicating his desire to address the situation publicly and perhaps seek a collective resolution or endorsement for his intended verdict. The act of calling everyone together underscores the public nature of the trial and Pilate's attempt to manage the volatile situation through a formal proceeding.
  • people (Greek, laós', G2992): This term refers to the general populace or a nation as a whole, distinguishing it from a specific local populace (dēmos). In this context, it refers to the Jewish people gathered for Passover, many of whom had initially welcomed Jesus into Jerusalem. Their inclusion in this assembly is crucial, as their eventual turning against Jesus, swayed by the chief priests and rulers, becomes a pivotal element in the narrative of His condemnation.

Verse Breakdown

  • "¶ And Pilate,": The introductory phrase signals a new development in the narrative, focusing on the Roman governor's next action. Pilate is the central human authority figure in this scene, possessing the power of life and death, yet he is depicted as a man under considerable duress.
  • "when he had called together": This clause highlights Pilate's initiative. Having already interrogated Jesus and sent Him to Herod, and finding no grounds for condemnation, Pilate now formally convenes all the key stakeholders. This action suggests a move towards a public declaration or a final attempt to resolve the escalating conflict.
  • "the chief priests and the rulers and the people,": This tripartite listing identifies the diverse but unified opposition to Jesus. "The chief priests" represent the highest religious authority, largely Sadducees, who controlled the Temple. "The rulers" likely refer to the elders of the Sanhedrin and other influential Jewish leaders. The inclusion of "the people" signifies the broad public involvement, indicating that the Jewish leadership had successfully incited a significant portion of the populace against Jesus, transforming what might have been a private hearing into a public spectacle.

Literary Devices

Luke employs Synecdoche and Parallelism in this verse to emphasize the comprehensive nature of the opposition Jesus faced. By listing "the chief priests and the rulers and the people," Luke uses synecdoche, where a part (these specific groups) represents the whole (the entire Jewish establishment and a significant portion of the populace). This highlights the unified front against Jesus. Furthermore, the Parallelism in the repeated "and" linking these three distinct groups underscores the breadth and depth of the forces arrayed against Jesus, creating a sense of overwhelming, collective demand for His condemnation. This literary choice effectively sets the stage for the dramatic confrontation that follows, where Pilate's attempts at justice are ultimately overridden by this formidable coalition.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Luke 23:13 serves as a poignant reminder of humanity's propensity to reject divine truth when it clashes with political expediency, religious dogma, or popular opinion. Pilate, representing secular authority, and the Jewish leaders, representing religious authority, both fail to uphold justice, each for their own reasons. This scene underscores the profound truth that Jesus' condemnation was not due to any fault of His own, but rather a tragic consequence of human sin, fear, and manipulation. The rejection of the innocent Son of God by both religious and civil powers foreshadows the broader human condition and its need for divine intervention.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Luke 23:13 invites us to reflect on the nature of justice, the dangers of succumbing to external pressures, and the unwavering innocence of Christ. Pilate's dilemma—knowing Jesus is innocent yet fearing the crowd—is a timeless struggle. It challenges us to examine our own lives: do we stand for what is right, even when it is unpopular or costly? Are we swayed by the loudest voices, or do we seek truth and righteousness? This passage serves as a powerful cautionary tale against mob mentality and the manipulation of public sentiment, reminding us that true integrity means upholding justice regardless of the consequences. It also highlights the profound injustice suffered by Jesus, who, despite being declared innocent by the very authorities who judged Him, was condemned for the sins of humanity.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what situations do I find myself tempted to compromise my convictions due to external pressure or the desire for popular approval?
  • How can I cultivate the moral courage to stand for truth and justice, even when it is difficult or unpopular?
  • What role do I play in shaping public opinion, and how can I ensure my influence promotes righteousness rather than manipulation?
  • How does Jesus' innocent suffering in this passage deepen my understanding of His sacrifice for my sins?

FAQ

Why did Pilate "call together" these specific groups, and what was his intention?

Answer: Pilate "called together" the chief priests, the rulers, and the people to make a public statement regarding Jesus' case. His intention was likely multifaceted: to publicly declare his finding of Jesus' innocence, to seek a public consensus for Jesus' release, or to find a compromise that would appease both the Jewish leadership and the agitated crowd, thereby preventing a riot during the volatile Passover festival. He had already sent Jesus to Herod, who also found no fault, so Pilate was trying to offload responsibility or find a way to justify releasing Jesus without appearing weak or inciting rebellion. This public assembly was a political maneuver to manage the intense pressure he was under, as seen in Luke 23:14-15.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Luke 23:13, though seemingly a simple procedural detail in the trial, profoundly foreshadows the ultimate Christ-centered fulfillment of God's redemptive plan. Pilate's act of calling together the very groups who would demand Jesus' death—the religious elite and the swayed populace—demonstrates the universal rejection of God's Son by humanity. Yet, this rejection, far from thwarting God's purpose, was precisely the means by which it was accomplished. Just as the prophet Isaiah foretold that the Suffering Servant would be "despised and rejected by men" (Isaiah 53:3), so too was Jesus. The assembly's demand for Jesus' crucifixion, despite Pilate's repeated declarations of His innocence (e.g., John 18:38), highlights humanity's sinfulness and its desperate need for a Savior. This orchestrated rejection, culminating in the cross, becomes the very instrument of salvation, fulfilling the divine counsel and foreknowledge of God (Acts 2:23). Thus, even in this scene of human injustice and political maneuvering, we see the sovereign hand of God working through the actions of men to bring about the atoning sacrifice of the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world.

Copy as

Commentary on Luke 23 verses 13–25

We have here the blessed Jesus run down by the mob, and hurried to the cross in the storm of a popular noise and tumult, raised by the malice and artifice of the chief priests, as agents for the prince of the power of the air.

I. Pilate solemnly protests that he believes he has done nothing worthy of death or of bonds. And, if he did believe so, he ought immediately to have discharged him, and not only so, but to have protected him from the fury of the priests and rabble, and to have bound his prosecutors to their good behaviour for their insolent conduct. But, being himself a bad man, he had no kindness for Christ, and, having made himself otherwise obnoxious, was afraid of displeasing either the emperor or the people; and therefore, for want of integrity, he called together the chief priests, and rulers, and people (whom he should have dispersed, as a riotous and seditious assembly, and forbid them to come near him), and will hear what they have to say, to whom he should have turned a deaf ear, for he plainly saw what spirit actuated them (Luk 23:14): "You have brought," saith he, "this man to me, and, because I have a respect for you, I have examined him before you, and have heard all you have to allege against him, and I can make nothing of it: I find no fault in him; you cannot prove the things whereof you accuse him."

II. He appeals to Herod concerning him (Luk 23:15): "I sent you to him, who is supposed to have known more of him than I have done, and he has sent him back, not convicted of any thing, nor under any mark of his displeasure; in his opinion, his crimes are not capital. He has laughed at him as a weak man, but has not stigmatized him as a dangerous man." He thought Bedlam a fitter place for him than Tyburn.

III. He proposes to release him, if they will but consent to it. He ought to have done it without asking leave of them, Fiat justitia, ruat coelum - Let justice have its course, though the heavens should be desolated. But the fear of man brings many into this snare, that, whereas justice should take place, though heaven and earth come together, they will do an unjust thing, against their consciences, rather than pull an old house about their ears. Pilate declares him innocent, and therefore has a mind to release him; yet, to please the people, 1. He will release him under the notion of a malefactor, because of necessity he must release one (Luk 23:17); so that whereas he ought to have been released by an act of justice, and thanks to nobody, he would have him released by an act of grace, and not be beholden to the people for it. 2. He will chastise him, and release him. If no fault be to be found in him, why should he be chastised? There is as much injustice in scourging as in crucifying an innocent man; nor would it be justified by pretending that this would satisfy the clamours of the people, and make him the object of their pity who was not to be the object of their envy. We must not do evil that good may come.

IV. The people choose rather to have Barabbas released, a wretched fellow, that had nothing to recommend him to their favour but the daringness of his crimes. He was imprisoned for a sedition made in the city, and for murder (of all crimes among men the least pardonable), yet this was the criminal that was preferred before Christ: Away with this man, and release unto us Barabbas, Luk 23:18, Luk 23:19. And no wonder that such a man is the favourite and darling of such a mob, he that was really seditious, rather than he that was really loyal and falsely accused of sedition.

V. When Pilate urged the second time that Christ should be released, they cried out, Crucify him, crucify him, Luk 23:20, Luk 23:21. They not only will have him die, but will have him die so great a death; nothing less will serve but he must be crucified: Crucify him, crucify him.

VI. When Pilate the third time reasoned with them, to show them the unreasonableness and injustice of it, they were the more peremptory and outrageous (Luk 23:22): "Why? What evil hath he done? Name his crime. I have found no cause of death, and you cannot say what cause of death you have found in him; and therefore, if you will but speak the word, I will chastise him and let him go." But popular fury, the more it is complimented, the more furious it grows; they were instant with loud voices, with great noises or outcries, not requesting, but requiring, that he might be crucified; as if they had as much right, at the feast, to demand the crucifying of one that was innocent as the release of one that was guilty.

VII. Pilate's yielding, at length, to their importunity. The voice of the people and of the chief priests prevailed, and were too hard for Pilate, and overruled him to go contrary to his convictions and inclinations. He had not courage to go against so strong a stream, but gave sentence that it should be as they required, Luk 23:24. Here is judgment turned away backward, and justice standing afar off, for fear of popular fury. Truth is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter, Isa 59:14. Judgment was looked for, but behold oppression; righteousness, but behold a cry, Isa 5:7. This is repeated in Luk 23:25, with the aggravating circumstance of the release of Barabbas: He released unto them him that for sedition and murder was cast into prison, who hereby would be hardened in his wickedness, and do the more mischief, because him they had desired, being altogether such a one as themselves; but he delivered Jesus to their will, and he could not deal more barbarously with him than to deliver him to their will, who hated him with a perfect hatred, and whose tender mercies were cruelty.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 13–25. Public domain.
Copy as
TertullianAD 220
An Answer to the Jews
And "the clouds were commanded not to rain a shower upon the vineyard of Sorek," -the clouds being celestial benefits, which were commanded not to be forthcoming to the house of Israel; for it "had borne thorns"-whereof that house of Israel had wrought a crown for Christ-and not "righteousness, but a clamour,"-the clamour whereby it had extorted His surrender to the cross. And thus, the former gifts of grace being withdrawn, "the law and the prophets were until John," and the fishpool of Bethsaida until the advent of Christ: thereafter it ceased curatively to remove from Israel infirmities of health; since, as the result of their perseverance in their frenzy, the name of the Lord was through them blasphemed, as it is written: "On your account the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles: " for it is from them that the infamy (attached to that name) began, and (was propagated during) the interval from Tiberius to Vespasian.
Cyril of JerusalemAD 386
Catechetical Lecture 13:3
Many have been crucified throughout the world, but the demons are not afraid of any of these. These people died because of their own sins, but Christ died for the sin of others. He “did not sin, neither was deceit found in his mouth.” It was not Peter, who could be suspected of partiality, who said this, but Isaiah, who, although not present in the flesh, in spirit foresaw the Lord’s coming in the flesh. Why do I bring only the prophet as a witness? Take the witness of Pilate himself. He passed judgment on him, by saying, “I find no guilt in this man.” When he delivered him over and washed his hands, he said, “I am innocent of the blood of this just man.” The robber is another witness to Jesus’ innocence. He is the first man to enter paradise. He rebuked his friend and said, “We are receiving what our deeds deserved, but this man has done nothing wrong, because you and I were present at his judgment.”
Ambrose of Milan (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 397
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Here Pilate, who as a judge acquits Christ, is made the minister of His crucifixion. He is sent to Herod, sent back to Pilate, as it follows, Nor yet Herod, for I sent you to him, and behold nothing worthy of death is done unto him. They both refuse to pronounce Him guilty, yet for fear's sake, Pilate gratifies the cruel desires of the Jews.

Not unreasonably do they seek the pardon of a murderer, who were themselves demanding the death of the innocent. Such are the laws of iniquity, that what innocence hates, guilt loves. And here the interpretation of the name affords a figurative resemblance, for Barabbas is in Latin, the son of a father. Those then to whom it is said, Ye are of your father the Devil, are represented as about to prefer to the true Son of God the son of their father, that is, Antichrist.
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
EXPOSITION OF THE GOSPEL OF LUKE 10.101-2
Similarly, I think that this is a prototype of all judgments that they would condemn those whom they believed to be innocent. However, it is evident that the Gentiles are more tolerant than the Jews, as Pilate's association with them demonstrates, and they are more persuaded by divine works. But what about those who crucified the Lord of majesty? It is not without reason that murderers seek absolution, as they sought the destruction of the innocent. Such unjust laws have the quality of hating innocence and loving crime. However, in the interpretation of the name, it gives the appearance of a figure; for Barabbas is translated to mean 'son of the father' in Latin: therefore, those to whom it is said, 'You are of your father the devil,' are shown to prefer the son of their father, Antichrist, over the true Son of God.
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
EXPOSITION OF THE GOSPEL OF LUKE 10.100
He is sent to Herod, sent back to Pilate. And although neither of them pronounce him guilty, they still comply with the desires of someone else's cruelty. Indeed, Pilate washed his hands, but he did not wash away his deeds; for a judge ought not to yield to envy or fear, so as to deliver the blood of an innocent person. His wife warned him: grace shone in the darkness; divinity was evident; yet she did not temper the sacrilegious sentence in this way.
John Chrysostom (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 407
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
For they thought they could add this, namely, that Jesus was worse than a robber, and so wicked, that neither for mercy's sake, or by the privilege of the feast, ought He to be let free.
Augustine of Hippo (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 430
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Luke returns to those things which were going on before the governor, from which He had digressed in order to relate what took place with Herod; saying as follows, And Pilate, when he had called, &c. from which we infer, that he has omitted the part wherein Pilate questioned our Lord what He had to answer to His accusers.
Cyril of AlexandriaAD 444
COMMENTARY ON LUKE, HOMILY 152
They brought the holy and just One to Pilate. They spoke violent and unrestrained words against him and poured out falsely invented accusations. They persisted in the ferocity with which they accused him. Pilate then ruled that it should be as they desired, although he had publicly said, “I find no wickedness in this man.” It says, “They cried out, ‘Away with him, crucify him!’ ” The Lord had rebuked this unmerciful and unlawful cry by the voice of the prophet Isaiah. It is written, “The vineyard of the Lord of hosts is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah are his pleasant planting; and he looked for justice, but behold, bloodshed; for righteousness, but behold, a cry!” In another place, he said of them, “Woe to them, for they have strayed from me! Destruction to them, for they have rebelled against me! I would redeem them, but they speak lies against me.” It is written again, “Their princes shall fall by the sword, because of the rudeness of their tongue.”
Bede (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 735
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Perish then those writings, which, composed so long a time after Christ, convict not the accused of magical arts against Pilate, but the writers themselves of treachery and lying against Christ.

As if he said, I will subject Him to all the scourgings and mockings you desire, but do not thirst after the innocent blood. It follows, For of necessity he must release one unto them, &c. an obligation not imposed by a decree of the imperial law, but binding by the annual custom of the nation, whom in such things he was glad to please.

Even to this day their request still clings to the Jews. For since when they had the choice given to them, they chose a robber for Jesus, a murderer for a Saviour; rightly lost they both life and salvation, and became subject to such robberies and seditions among themselves as to forfeit both their country and kingdom.

With the worst kind of death, that is, crucifixion, they long to murder the innocent. For they who hung on the cross, with their hands and feet fixed by nails to the wood, suffered a prolonged death, that their agony might not quickly cease; but the death of the cross was chosen by our Lord, as that which having overcome the Devil, He was about to place as a trophy on the brows of the faithful.

This chastisement wherewith Pilate sought to satisfy the people, lest their rage should go even so far as to crucify Jesus, John's words bear testimony that he not only threatened but performed together with mockings and scourgings. But when they saw all their charges which they brought against the Lord baffled by Pilate's diligent questioning, they resort at last to prayers only; entreating that He might be crucified.
Theophylact of Ohrid (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 1107
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Wherefore by the testimony of two men, Jesus is declared innocent, but the Jews His accusers brought forward no witness whom they could believe. See then how truth triumphs. Jesus is silent, and His enemies witness for Him; the Jews make loud cries, and not one of them corroborates their clamour.

Pilate therefore lenient and easy, yet wanting in firmness for the truth, because afraid of being accused, adds, I will therefore chastise him and release him.

For the Romans permitted the Jews to live according to their own laws and customs. And it was a natural custom of the Jews to seek pardon of the prince for those who were condemned, as they asked Jonathan of Saul. And hence it is now added, with respect to their petition, And they cried all at once, Away with this man, and release unto us Barabbas, &c. (1 Sam. 14:45.)

Thus it came to pass, the once holy nation rages to slay, the Gentile Pilate forbids slaughter; as it follows, Pilate therefore spoke again unto them, but they cried out, Crucify, &c.

Three times did Pilate acquit Christ, for it follows, And he said unto them the third time, Why, what evil hath he done? I will chastise him, and let him go.

They cry out the third time against Christ, that by this third voice, they may approve the murder to be their own, which by their entreaties they extorted; for it follows, And Pilate gave sentence that it should be as they required. And he released him that for sedition and murder was cast into prison, but delivered Jesus to their will.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Luke 23:13 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.