Skip to content

Luke 2:41

“The Boy Jesus in the Temple”Luke 2:41–52

King James Version
Now his parents went to Jerusalem every year at the feast of the passover.

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
Now G2532 his G846 parents G1118 went G4198 to G1519 Jerusalem G2419 every G2596 year G2094 at the feast G1859 of the passover G3957.

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
Every year His parents went to Jerusalem for the Feast of the Passover.

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
And his parents went every year to Jerusalem at the feast of the passover.

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
His parents went every year to Jerusalem at the feast of the Passover.

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
Nowe his parents went to Hierusalem euery yeere, at the feast of the Passeouer.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
And his parents were going yearly to Jerusalem, at the feast of the passover,

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
13 Greek words
  1. ΚαὶKaiAndG2532CONJConjunction
  2. ἐπορεύοντοeporeuontowere goingG4198V-INI-3PVerb Imperfect Middle Or Passive Deponent Indicative 3rd Plural
  3. οἱhoitheG3588T-NPMDefinite article Nominative Plural Masculine
  4. γονεῖςgoneisparentsG1118N-NPMNoun Nominative Plural Masculine
  5. αὐτοῦautouof HimG846P-GSMPersonal pronoun Genitive Singular Masculine
  6. κατ᾽kat᾽everyG2596PREPPreposition
  7. ἔτοςetosyearG2094N-ASNNoun Accusative Singular Neuter
  8. εἰςeistoG1519PREPPreposition
  9. ἸερουσαλὴμIerousalēmJerusalemG2419N-ASF-LNoun Accusative Singular Feminine Location
  10. τῇtēaat theG3588T-DSFDefinite article Dative Singular Feminine
  11. ἑορτῇhe'ortēafeastG1859N-DSFNoun Dative Singular Feminine
  12. τοῦtouof theG3588T-GSNDefinite article Genitive Singular Neuter
  13. πάσχαpaschaPassoverG3957N-GSNNoun Genitive Singular Neuter
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
In the KJVVerse 25,015 of 31,102 · 80.4%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

Every year Mary and Joseph went up to Jerusalem for the Passover, the feast the law of Moses commanded, so Jesus grew up in a home that kept God’s law faithfully.

“Now his parents”

Mary and Joseph together, the ones who raised him, named as his parents even though Luke has told us he is the Son of God.

“went to Jerusalem every year”

A long, demanding journey from Nazareth, made year after year out of obedience to the law.

“at the feast of the passover.”

The feast of Israel’s deliverance from Egypt, which Jesus himself would fulfil as the Lamb of God.

Passage studyLuke 2:41–52

The Boy Jesus in His Father’s House

Summary

Every year Mary and Joseph went up to Jerusalem for the Passover, and when Jesus was twelve he went with them. On the way home they discovered he was missing, went back, and after three days found him in the temple, sitting among the teachers, listening to them and asking them questions, while all who heard him were astonished at his understanding. To his mother’s anguished question he gave his first recorded words: “wist ye not that I must be about my Father’s business?” The saying was beyond his parents at the time. He went home with them to Nazareth and was subject to them, his mother kept all these things in her heart, and he grew in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and man. This one glimpse of his boyhood shows us the Son of God, who knew God as his own Father, living a real human childhood in a faithful home.

Why the family went up to Jerusalem every year

The law of Moses commanded every man in Israel to appear before the LORD three times a year, at the feast of unleavened bread, the feast of weeks and the feast of tabernacles (Deuteronomy 16:16, Exodus 23:14–17). Passover, or Pesach, was one of these three great pilgrim feasts, with Pentecost and Tabernacles. Only the men were strictly required to go, but devout families often travelled together, and Luke tells us that Jesus’ parents went “every year”. Nazareth in Galilee lies roughly seventy to eighty miles from Jerusalem, several days’ walk each way, so the journey cost them planning, time and money every time they made it. Luke’s verb, poreúomai, is the ordinary word for travelling or making one’s way, and with “every year” it describes a settled habit of obedience.

Luke calls Mary and Joseph Jesus’ goneús, his “parents”, a word built on the same base as gínomai, “to become” or “to be born”, for those who bring a child into the world and raise him. Luke has already told us that Jesus is the Son of God, and he still names Mary and Joseph together as the parents who brought him up in a devout Jewish home.

The word páscha, which comes from Aramaic, covers the whole of the festival: the meal, the day, the feast and the sacrifices that belonged to it. Passover remembered the night the LORD brought Israel out of slavery in Egypt, when the blood of a lamb marked the houses of his people (Exodus 12). The law also made it a feast for teaching children. When they asked, “What mean ye by this service?”, their parents were to answer, “It is the sacrifice of the LORD’s passover, who passed over the houses of the children of Israel in Egypt” (Exodus 12:26–27). Mary and Joseph’s yearly journey was this same handing on of faith from one generation to the next.

Luke says the family “went up” to Jerusalem. The city stands in the hills, so travellers always climbed to reach it, and going up to the holy city for worship carried a weight of its own. They went “after the custom of the feast”, and the word for custom, éthos, means an established habit or practice. Their journey was the expected practice of devout families, shared with the whole community of Israel.

Paul says that God sent forth his Son, “made of a woman, made under the law” (Galatians 4:4). Here we see that in practice, as the Son of God grows up in a household that keeps the law, among the customs of his own people. He later said that he came to fulfil the law and the prophets (Matthew 5:17), and his life carried Israel’s story forward to the fulfilment of its promises.

The Passover and the Lamb of God

The feast this family kept each year pointed to the boy who travelled with them. John the Baptist would one day see Jesus coming and say, “Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29). Jesus would come up to Jerusalem at Passover again as a man, and at the Passover meal he would give his disciples the cup as “the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you” (Luke 22:20). The deliverance from Egypt that Mary and Joseph remembered each year was a picture of the greater deliverance from sin and death that he would bring by his own sacrifice, as the true Passover Lamb.

Why Luke tells us Jesus was twelve

Luke dates the visit precisely: “when he was twelve years old”. His verb, gínomai, means to become or come to be, and it fits a boy who had reached that age through the real years of a human childhood. The number itself, dṓdeka, is a weighty one in Scripture, with the twelve tribes of Israel and the twelve apostles, but here it marks a stage of life.

In Jewish custom twelve was the threshold of religious maturity, the age at which a boy began to take more personal responsibility for keeping the commandments of the law. Later Judaism set this at thirteen and marked it with the bar mitzvah, when a boy becomes a “son of the commandment”, and that ceremony took its formal shape after Jesus’ day. The idea of a boy coming of age under the law was already there, though, and Jesus came to the temple at that threshold. A visit to Jerusalem and its temple at such an age was a formative time in a boy’s life.

Luke has just told us that “the child grew, and waxed strong in spirit, filled with wisdom: and the grace of God was upon him” (Luke 2:40). He ends this account with a sentence very like it in verse 52, and the scene in the temple, set between the two, shows that wisdom at work. It is the only event the Gospels record from the years between Jesus’ infancy and the start of his ministry.

How Jesus came to be left behind

When the family “had fulfilled the days”, they had stayed for the whole feast, which with the days of unleavened bread ran for seven days. The verb teleióō means to complete or bring to its end, so everything the feast required of them had been done before they set out for home.

Then “the child Jesus tarried behind in Jerusalem”. The verb hypoménō means to stay behind or remain, and it can also mean to endure or hold firm. Luke reports only that he stayed, and he leaves the reason for the boy’s own words in the temple. “Joseph and his mother knew not of it” pairs ginṓskō, the common verb for knowing, with the negative ou, so they were wholly unaware.

Pilgrims travelled to the feasts in large companies of relatives, friends and neighbours, for safety and companionship on the road. Luke’s word for such a company, synodía, joins syn, “with”, and hodos, “way”, and means fellow travellers on a journey, a caravan. In a group like that, a twelve-year-old nearing manhood could move freely from one family to another, and his parents went on “supposing him to have been in the company”. The verb nomízō comes from nomos, “law” or “custom”, and means to reckon a thing by what is usual. Their assumption was a reasonable one in that setting.

“A day’s journey” meant walking from dawn to dusk, perhaps fifteen to thirty miles. Most likely it was when the company stopped for the night and families gathered that Jesus was missed. They looked first “among their kinsfolk and acquaintance”, that is, among their relatives (syngenḗs) and the people they knew well (gnōstós, “well known”, from ginōskō, “to know”). The search reached beyond their own family to everyone they knew in the company.

“And when they found him not” joins heurískō, “to find”, to the negative mḗ, and then they “turned back again to Jerusalem”. The verb hypostréphō means to turn back or return, and here it meant giving up the road home and walking the whole day’s distance again. They went “seeking him”, and zētéō is the word for an earnest and persistent search. Mary uses the same verb in verse 48 when she says “thy father and I have sought thee sorrowing”. Jerusalem was crowded with pilgrims at the feast, which made finding one boy there a daunting task.

Did Jesus do wrong by staying behind?

It is fair to ask whether a boy who caused his parents three days of anguish acted rightly. Jesus answers it himself in verse 49. He stayed because he belonged in his Father’s house, and he expected his parents to know where to find him. Scripture says that he was “in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin” (Hebrews 4:15), and Jesus said of his Father, “I do always those things that please him” (John 8:29). His staying behind was devotion to his Father’s will, already at twelve, and Luke immediately adds that he went home with his parents and was subject to them. Mary and Joseph’s distress was real and understandable, and it came from a purpose of God they were yet to grasp. Even the most devoted parents can lose track of a child in a crowd, and Luke tells it plainly, without blame on either side.

Found in the temple among the teachers

“After three days they found him in the temple.” The word for temple here, hierón, means the whole sacred precinct, with its courts and porticoes, as distinct from the naos, the sanctuary itself. The outer courts were where teachers of the law gathered to teach and discuss, so this was the natural place for such a conversation, at the very centre of Israel’s worship and learning.

The KJV’s “doctors” translates didáskalos, from the verb “to teach”, which means teachers or masters. These were the scribes and experts in the law of Moses and its traditions, the most learned men of the nation. A devout boy listening to them in the temple courts was an ordinary sight. What astonished everyone was this boy’s understanding.

Jesus was “sitting in the midst” of them, “both hearing them, and asking them questions”. The verb for hearing, akoúō, covers listening attentively and understanding what is heard, and the verb for asking, eperōtáō, means to inquire or question. He listened and he questioned, as a learner does, and the questions themselves showed how deeply he understood.

It is hard to read of a son lost for three days and found in his Father’s house without thinking of the three days before the resurrection. Luke leaves that connection unspoken, so it is best held lightly.

The wisdom that astonished the teachers

“All that heard him were astonished at his understanding and answers.” The hearers take in the teachers and very likely the other pilgrims and onlookers in the courts as well. The verb exístēmi comes from ek, “out of”, and hístēmi, “to stand”, and means to be put out of one’s wits, so amazed as to be beside oneself. It is a strong word for overwhelming wonder.

They marvelled at his sýnesis, “understanding”, a noun from syníēmi, “to bring together”. It means the kind of insight that puts truths together and sees how they connect, a grasp of the things of God that goes far beyond memorised facts. They marvelled too at his apókrisis, “answers”, from apokrínomai, “to answer”. The plural shows a real exchange, in which he asked the teachers questions and also answered theirs.

This is the wisdom Isaiah foretold for the Messiah: “the spirit of the LORD shall rest upon him, the spirit of wisdom and understanding”, and he “shall make him of quick understanding in the fear of the LORD” (Isaiah 11:2–3). All such wisdom comes from God, for “the LORD giveth wisdom: out of his mouth cometh knowledge and understanding” (Proverbs 2:6). The same astonishment followed Jesus all through his ministry. “The people were astonished at his doctrine: For he taught them as one having authority, and not as the scribes” (Matthew 7:28–29). The Jews marvelled, saying, “How knoweth this man letters, having never learned?” (John 7:15), and the officers sent to take him came back saying, “Never man spake like this man” (John 7:46).

The source of such understanding is who Jesus is. He is the Word who was with God in the beginning and by whom all things were made (John 1:1–5), the one “in whom are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge” (Colossians 2:2–3), and “Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God” (1 Corinthians 1:24). The boy in the temple courts was the wisdom of God in human flesh, and yet, as verse 52 tells us, he still grew.

Mary’s question

“When they saw him, they were amazed.” The verb ekplḗssō means to be struck with astonishment, and their amazement was relief and awe at once. Their lost son was safe, and he was holding his own among the teachers of Israel.

Mary speaks for both of them. She begins tenderly with “Son”, and her question is direct: “why hast thou thus dealt with us?” It is a mother’s bewildered hurt, with a gentle reproach in it, because his absence had cost them so much. “Behold” (idoú) calls him to look at what it has meant for them, and “thy father and I” shows that Joseph, as the father of the household, shared the search and the fear. Her last word, “sorrowing”, translates odynáō, a verb for being in pain or anguish. For three days they had searched (zētéō again) in real distress.

When Mary says “thy father”, she means Joseph. Jesus’ answer turns on that word, for in the next breath he speaks of “my Father”, and he means God.

Jesus’ first words about his Father

These are the first words of Jesus recorded in the Gospels, and they are two questions: “How is it that ye sought me? wist ye not that I must be about my Father’s business?” He is gently surprised that they searched at all, since to him the place to find him was plain.

“Wist” is the old English for “knew”, and it translates eídō, a verb that means to see and so to know. His question implies that his parents, after all that had been revealed to them about him, had good reason to know where he would be. “Must” translates deî, “it is necessary”, the language of a binding obligation. Jesus stayed because there was something he had to do, a necessity that came from who he is and what he came to do.

“My Father’s” is patḗr, “father”, with moû, “my”. This is the earliest recorded time Jesus calls God his Father, and he speaks of God as his own Father in a way that belongs to him alone. Mary had said “thy father”, meaning Joseph, and Jesus gently and plainly names who his Father is.

The Greek behind “about my Father’s business” is en tois tou patros mou, literally “in the things of my Father”. The phrase can mean his Father’s house or his Father’s affairs, and faithful translations render it both ways. The KJV has “about my Father’s business”, and many modern versions have “in my Father’s house”. Both are true of this moment, because he was in the temple, his Father’s house, and he was about his Father’s work. The words reach beyond the temple to the whole of his mission, to reveal the Father, to do his will and to accomplish the work of redemption.

He spoke the same way all his life. “My meat is to do the will of him that sent me, and to finish his work,” he told his disciples (John 4:34). “The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do” (John 5:19). “For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me” (John 6:38). Hebrews gives his words as he comes into the world: “Lo, I come (in the volume of the book it is written of me,) to do thy will, O God” (Hebrews 10:7). The obedience he spoke of at twelve he carried through to the cross, where he said, “It is finished” (John 19:30). The Word who was made flesh and dwelt among us (John 1:14) came to declare the Father (John 1:18), and at twelve he already knows it.

The temple remained his Father’s house in his eyes. When he drove out the traders he said, “make not my Father’s house an house of merchandise” (John 2:16), and in Matthew he says, “My house shall be called the house of prayer” (Matthew 21:12–13). He also spoke of the temple of his body, which would be destroyed and raised up in three days (John 2:19–21), so that he himself became the place where God dwells among his people.

Did Jesus put his Father ahead of his family?

He did, and he always would. His first loyalty belonged to his Father, and he later called his disciples to put him before even father and mother (Luke 14:26) and to “seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness” (Matthew 6:33). At the wedding in Cana he answered his mother, “Woman, what have I to do with thee? mine hour is not yet come” (John 2:4), and during his ministry those closest to him once went out to lay hold on him, saying, “He is beside himself” (Mark 3:21). Yet in this very scene he goes straight home and obeys his parents. In him, putting God first and honouring father and mother belong together.

Why the saying was beyond Mary and Joseph

“And they understood not the saying which he spake unto them.” The verb syníēmi means to put together, to grasp with the mind. They heard every word, and only later could they put it together with what they knew of him. The “saying” is rhēma, a particular spoken word, here the words of verse 49 about his Father. “Spake” is laléō, to talk or utter words.

This can be surprising, since Mary had heard the angel’s message (Luke 1:26–38), Joseph had been told in a dream (Matthew 1:18–25), and both had heard the shepherds, Simeon and Anna. They knew he was the promised Son. What his Sonship meant, and how his mission would unfold, came to them gradually, as it did to everyone around him. The LORD says, “For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways” (Isaiah 55:8–9). The disciples, too, “understood not that saying, and were afraid to ask him” when he foretold his death (Mark 9:32), and later “this saying was hid from them” (Luke 18:34). Their puzzlement was a first sign of how hard his own people would find him to understand, for John says, “He came unto his own, and his own received him not” (John 1:10–11). Full understanding came after his death and resurrection, when the Holy Spirit taught his followers all things and brought his words to their remembrance (John 14:26), and guided them into all truth (John 16:13).

Was this a failure on their part?

It was no failure. Mary and Joseph were faithful and chosen by God, and what Jesus spoke of was greater than anyone could take in at once. Mary’s response in the next verse shows the right way to hold a word from God that is beyond us. She kept it and pondered it, and waited for God to make it plain.

Subject to his parents in Nazareth

“He went down with them, and came to Nazareth.” From the hills of Judea the road to Galilee goes down, and the boy who had astonished the teachers of Israel went back to an ordinary home in a small town. Nazareth was obscure enough that Nathanael asked, “Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth?” (John 1:46).

There he “was subject unto them”. The verb hypotássō means to place under, and it describes a willing submission to rightful authority. The one who had just called God his Father freely put himself under the care and direction of Mary and Joseph. In doing so he kept the commandment, “Honour thy father and thy mother” (Exodus 20:12), as one “made under the law” (Galatians 4:4). His submission was humility and strength in one, and it began the obedience that ran through his whole life.

Paul describes where that obedience led. Christ “made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant”, and “became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross” (Philippians 2:5–8, 2:7–8). Hebrews says, “Though he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered” (Hebrews 5:8), and Jesus said that “the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many” (Mark 10:45).

Luke’s next glimpse of Jesus comes when he begins his ministry at about thirty years of age (Luke 3:23), some eighteen years later. Those hidden years in Nazareth, spent growing up, learning a trade as young men of his day did, and taking his place in family and town, were part of God’s plan and timing as surely as the years of ministry.

Mary kept these sayings in her heart

“But his mother kept all these sayings in her heart.” The verb diatēréō means to watch over thoroughly, to guard carefully, so Mary held on to these words and turned them over. The word for “sayings”, rhēma, can take in the events as well as the words, everything she had seen and heard. The heart, kardía, is in Scripture the centre of the whole person, mind, will and feelings together, so she pondered these things in the depths of her being and let them shape her faith.

Luke said the same of her after the shepherds came: “But Mary kept all these things, and pondered them in her heart” (Luke 2:19). Hers is the faith of the psalmist who says, “Thy word have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against thee” (Psalm 119:11). As she watched her Son grow up, she was a faithful witness to the mystery of who he is.

How Jesus grew in wisdom and stature

“And Jesus increased in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and man.” The verb for increased, prokóptō, pictures driving or cutting one’s way forward, and so means to advance or make progress. It describes steady, continuing growth.

Luke names four ways he grew. In wisdom, sophia, he grew in practical understanding and discernment, in knowing how to apply truth, and this deepened with the years. Wisdom in Israel was rooted in God’s law, for “the fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom” (Proverbs 9:10). In stature, hēlikía, he grew in body. The word can mean age as well as height, and here it refers mainly to his growth from a boy into a man, with a body as truly human as ours. In favour, cháris, the word often translated grace, he grew in God’s approval and delight, and in the goodwill and respect of the people of Nazareth, who watched him grow up among them.

The verse echoes what Scripture says of the boy Samuel: “And the child Samuel grew on, and was in favour both with the LORD, and also with men” (1 Samuel 2:26). Proverbs promises the same favour to those who hold to mercy and truth: “So shalt thou find favour and good understanding in the sight of God and man” (Proverbs 3:3–4). The Father’s favour on his Son was spoken aloud at his baptism, “Thou art my beloved Son; in thee I am well pleased” (Luke 3:22), and again on the mountain, “This is my beloved Son: hear him” (Luke 9:35).

Did Jesus really grow in wisdom if he is God?

He did. Jesus is fully God and fully man, one person with two natures, and in becoming man he took a true human mind as well as a human body. As a man he learned, understood and gained insight step by step, as we do, while his divine nature remained unchanged. This union of the two natures in the one person of Christ is called the hypostatic union. Luke 2:52 guards us against the old error, called Docetism, that Christ only appeared to be human. He shared our growing up as well as our flesh, and so he is a high priest who can “be touched with the feeling of our infirmities” (Hebrews 4:15). Paul speaks of believers coming “unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ” (Ephesians 4:13), and the one who grew perfectly in every way is the pattern for our own growth.

Seeking him and keeping his sayings

Jesus grew up in a home where the worship of God was a yearly, costly habit, and where parents brought their children to the feasts and explained them. Faith is still handed on that way, through steady worship together and through parents who answer their children’s questions about the things of God.

Mary and Joseph travelled a whole day assuming Jesus was somewhere in the company. It is easy for us, too, to take his presence for granted amid busy days and even amid religious routine. When they realised he was missing, they turned back and searched until they found him. The LORD promises, “And ye shall seek me, and find me, when ye shall search for me with all your heart” (Jeremiah 29:13), and Jesus says, “seek, and ye shall find” (Matthew 7:7). The psalmist prays, “With my whole heart have I sought thee: O let me not wander from thy commandments” (Psalm 119:10). Behind all our seeking is his own. The parables of Luke 15 tell of a shepherd and a woman who search until they find what was lost (Luke 15:8–10), and Jesus says, “For the Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost” (Luke 19:10).

When God’s ways are beyond you, you can do what Mary did: keep his word, ponder it, and wait for him to make it plain. The hidden years in Nazareth also give worth to quiet seasons. Most of the earthly life of the Son of God was spent in an ordinary town, obeying his parents and growing, and through those years he grew in favour with God and man.

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Luke 2:41–52. He set out his notes in a three-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 12 verses
Passage under commentLuke 2:41–52
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

We have here the only passage of story recorded concerning our blessed Saviour, from his infancy to the day of his showing to Israel at twenty-nine years old, and therefore we are concerned to make much of this, for it is in vain to wish we had more. Here is,

I.Christ's going up with his parents to Jerusalem, at the feast of the passover, Luke 2:41, Luke 2:42.

1.It was their constant practice to attend there, according to the law, though it was a long journey, and they were poor, and perhaps not well able, without straitening themselves, to bear the expenses of it. Note, Public ordinances must be frequented, and we must not forsake the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is. Worldly business must give way to spiritual concerns. Joseph and Mary had a son in the house with them, that was able to teach them better than all the rabbin at Jerusalem; yet they went up thither, after the custom of the feast. The Lord loves the gates of Zion more than all the dwellings of Jacob, and so should we. We have reason to suppose that Joseph went up likewise at the feasts of pentecost and tabernacles; for all the males were to appear there thrice a year, but Mary only at the passover, which was the greatest of the three feasts, and had most gospel in it.

2.The child Jesus, at twelve years old, went up with them. The Jewish doctors say that at twelve years old children must begin to fast from time to time, that they may learn to fast on the day of atonement; and that at thirteen years old a child begins to be a son of the commandment, that is, obliged to the duties of adult church-membership, having been from his infancy, by virtue of his circumcision, a son of the covenant. It is not said that this was the first time that Jesus went up to Jerusalem to worship at the feast: probably he had done it for some years before, having spirit and wisdom above his years; and all should attend on public worship that can hear with understanding, Nehemiah 8:2. Those children that are forward in other things should be put forward in religion. It is for the honour of Christ that children should attend on public worship, and he is pleased with their hosannas; and those children that were in their infancy dedicated to God should be called upon, when they are grown up, to come to the gospel passover, to the Lord's supper, that they make it their own act and deed to join themselves to the Lord.

II.Christ's tarrying behind his parents at Jerusalem, unknown to them, in which he designed to give an early specimen of what he was reserved for.

1.His parents did not return till they had fulfilled the days; they had staid there all the seven days at the feast, though it was not absolutely necessary that they should stay longer than the two first days, after which many went home. Note, It is good to stay to the conclusion of an ordinance, as becomes those who say, It is good to be here, and not to hasten away, as if we were like Doeg, detained before the Lord.

2.The child tarried behind in Jerusalem, not because he was loth to go home, or shy of his parents' company, but because he had business to do there, and would let his parents know that he had a Father in heaven, whom he was to be observant of more than of them; and respect to him must not be construed disrespect to them. Some conjecture that he tarried behind in the temple, for it was the custom of the pious Jews, on the morning that they were to go home, to go first to the temple, to worship God; there he staid behind, and found entertainment there till they found him again. Or, perhaps, he staid at the house where they lodged, or some other friend's house (and such a child as he was could not but be the darling of all that knew him, and every one would court his company), and went up to the temple only at church-time; but so it was that he staid behind. It is good to see young people willing to dwell in the house of the Lord; they are then like Christ.

3.His parents went the first day's journey without any suspicion that he was left behind, for they supposed him to have been in the company, Luke 2:44. On these occasions, the crowd was very great, especially the first day's journey, and the roads full of people; and they concluded that he came along with some of their neighbours, and they sought him among their kindred and acquaintance, that were upon the road, going down. Pray did you see our Son? or, Did you see him? Like the spouses's inquiry, Saw ye him whom my soul loveth? This was a jewel worth seeking after. They knew that every one would be desirous of his company, and that he would be willing to do good among his kinsfolk and acquaintance, but among them they found him not, Luke 2:45. There are many, too many, who are our kinsfolk and acquaintance, that we cannot avoid conversing with, among whom we find little or nothing of Christ. When they could not hear of him in this and the other company upon the road, yet they hoped they should meet with him at the place where they lodged that night; but there they could learn no tidings of him. Compare this with Job 23:8, Job 23:9.

4.When they found him not at their quarters at night, they turned back again, next morning, to Jerusalem, seeking him. Note, Those that would find Christ must seek till they find; for he will at length be found of those that seek him, and will be found their bountiful rewarder. Those that have lost their comforts in Christ, and the evidences of their interest in him, must bethink themselves where, and when, and how, they lost them, and must turn back again to the place where they last had them; must remember whence they are fallen, and repent, and do their first works, and return to their first love, Revelation 2:4, Revelation 2:5. Those that would recover their lost acquaintance with Christ must go to Jerusalem, the city of our solemnities, the place which he has chosen to put his name there; must attend upon him in his ordinances, in the gospel-passover, there they may hope to meet him.

5.The third day they found him in the temple, in some of the apartments belonging to the temple, where the doctors of the law kept, not their courts, but their conferences rather, or their schools for disputation; and there they found him sitting in the midst of them (Luke 2:46), not standing as a catechumen to be examined or instructed by them, for he had discovered such measures of knowledge and wisdom that they admitted him to sit among them as a fellow or member of their society. This is an instance, not only that he was filled with wisdom (Luke 2:40), but that he had both a desire to increase it and a readiness to communicate it; and herein he is an example to children and young people, who should learn of Christ to delight in the company of those they may get good by, and choose to sit in the midst of the doctors rather than in the midst of the players. Let them begin at twelve years old, and sooner, to enquire after knowledge, and to associate with those that are able to instruct them; it is a hopeful and promising presage in youth to be desirous of instruction. Many a youth at Christ's age now would have been playing with the children in the temple, but he was sitting with the doctors in the temple.

(1.)He heard them. Those that would learn must be swift to hear.

(2.)He asked them questions; whether, as a teacher (he had authority so to ask) or as a learner (he had humility so to ask) I know not, or whether as an associate, or joint-searcher after truth, which must be found out by mutual amicable disquisitions.

(3.)He returned answers to them, which were very surprising and satisfactory, Luke 2:47. And his wisdom and understanding appeared as much in the questions he asked as in the answers he gave, so that all who heard him were astonished: they never heard one so young, no indeed any of their greatest doctors, talk sense at the rate that he did; like David, he had more understanding than all his teachers, yea, than the ancients, Psalm 119:99, Psalm 119:100. Now Christ showed forth some rays of his glory, which were presently drawn in again. He gave them a taste (says Calvin) of his divine wisdom and knowledge. Methinks this public appearance of Christ in the temple, as a teacher, was like Moses's early attempt to deliver Israel, which Stephen put this construction upon, that he supposed his brethren would have understood, by that, how God by his hand would deliver them, Acts 7:24, Acts 7:25. They might have taken the hint, and been delivered then, but they understood not; so they here might have had Christ (for aught I know) to enter upon his work now, but they were only astonished, and understood not the indication; and therefore, like Moses, he retires into obscurity again, and they hear no more of him for many years after.

6.His mother talked with him privately about it. When the company broke up, she took him aside, and examined him about it with a deal of tenderness and affection, Luke 2:48. Joseph and Mary were both amazed to find him there, and to find that he had so much respect showed him as to be admitted to sit among the doctors, and to be taken notice of. His father knew he had only the name of a father, and therefore said nothing. But,

(1.)His mother told him how ill they took it: "Son, why hast thou thus dealt with us? Why didst thou put us into such a fright?" They were ready to say, as Jacob of Joseph, "A wild beast has devoured him; or, He is fallen into the hands of some more cruel enemy, who has at length found out that he was the young child whose life Herod had sought some years ago." A thousand imaginations, we may suppose, they had concerning him, each more frightful than another. "Now, why hast thou given us occasion for these fears? Thy father and I have sought thee, sorrowing; not only troubled that we lost thee, but vexed at ourselves that we did not take more care of thee, to bring thee along with us." Note, Those may have leave to complain of their losses that think they have lost Christ. But their weeping did not hinder sowing; they did not sorrow and sit down in despair, but sorrowed and sought. Note, If we would find Christ, we must seek him sorrowing, sorrowing that we have lost him, that we have provoked him to withdraw, and that we have sought him no sooner. They that thus seek him in sorrow shall find him, at length, with so much the greater joy.

(2.)He gently reproved their inordinate solicitude about him (Luke 2:49): "How is it that you sought me? You might have depended upon it, I would have followed you home when I had done the business I had to do here. I could not be lost in Jerusalem. Wist ye not that I ought to be, en tois tou patros mou; - in my Father's house?" so some read it; "where else should the Son be, who abideth in the house for ever? I ought to be," [1.] "Under my Father's care and protection; and therefore you should have cast the care of me upon him, and not have burdened yourselves with it." Christ is a shaft hid in his Father's quiver, Isaiah 49:2. He takes care of his church likewise, and therefore let us never despair of its safety. [2.] "At my Father's work" (so we take it): "I must be about my Father's business, and therefore could not go home as soon as you might. Wist ye not? Have you not already perceived that concerning me, that I have devoted myself to the service of religion, and therefore must employ myself in the affairs of it?" Herein he hath left us an example; for it becomes the children of God, in conformity to Christ, to attend their heavenly Father's business, and to make all other business give way to it. This word of Christ we now think we understand very well, for he hath explained it in what he hath done and said. It was his errand into the world, and his meat and drink in the world, to do his Father's will, and finish his work: and yet at that time his parents understood not this saying, Luke 2:50. They did not understand what business he had to do then in the temple for his Father. They believed him to be the Messiah, that should have the throne of his father David; but they thought that should rather bring him to the royal palace than to the temple. They understood not his prophetical office; and he was to do much of his work in that.

Lastly, Here is their return to Nazareth. This glimpse of his glory was to be short. It was now over, and he did not urge his parents either to come and settle at Jerusalem or to settle him there (though that was the place of improvement and preferment, and where he might have the best opportunities of showing his wisdom), but very willingly retired into his obscurity at Nazareth, where for many years he was, as it were, buried alive. Doubtless, he came up to Jerusalem, to worship at the feast, three times a year, but whether he ever went again into the temple, to dispute with the doctors there, we are not told; it is not improbable but he might. But here we are told,

1.That he was subject to his parents. Though once, to show that he was more than a man, he withdrew himself from his parents, to attend his heavenly Father's business, yet he did not, as yet, make that his constant practice, nor for many years after, but was subject to them, observed their order, and went and came as they directed, and, as it should seem, worked with his father at the trade of a carpenter. Herein he hath given an example to children to be dutiful and obedient to their parents in the Lord. Being made of a woman, he was made under the law of the fifth commandment, to teach the seed of the faithful thus to approve themselves to him a faithful seed. Though his parents were poor and mean, though his father was only his supposed father, yet he was subject to them; though he was strong in spirit, and filled with wisdom nay though he was the Son of God, yet he was subject to his parents; how then will they answer it who, though foolish and weak, yet are disobedient to their parents?

2.That his mother, though she did not perfectly understand her son's sayings, yet kept them in her heart, expecting that hereafter they would be explained to her, and she should fully understand them, and know how to make use of them. However we may neglect men's sayings because they are obscure (Si non vis intelligi debes negligi - If it be not intelligible, it is not valuable), yet we must not think so of God's sayings. That which at first is dark, so that we know not what to make of it, may afterwards become plain and easy; we should therefore lay it up for hereafter. See John 2:22. We may find use for that another time which now we see not how to make useful to us. A scholar keeps those grammar rules in memory which at present he understands not the use of, because he is told that they will hereafter be of use to him; so we must do by Christ's sayings.

3.That he improved, and came on, to admiration (Luke 2:52): He increased in wisdom and stature. In the perfections of his divine nature there could be no increase; but this is meant of his human nature, his body increased in stature and bulk, he grew in the growing age; and his soul increased in wisdom, and in all the endowments of a human soul. Though the Eternal Word was united to the human soul from his conception, yet the divinity that dwelt in him manifested itself to his humanity by degrees, ad modum recipientis - in proportion to his capacity; as the faculties of his human soul grew more and more capable, the gifts it received from the divine nature were more and more communicated. And he increased in favour with God and man, that is, in all those graces that rendered him acceptable to God and man. Herein Christ accommodated himself to his estate of humiliation, that, as he condescended to be an infant, a child, a youth, so the image of God shone brighter in him, when he grew up to be a youth, than it did, or could, while he was an infant and a child. Note, Young people, as they grow in stature, should grow in wisdom, and then, as they grow in wisdom, they will grow in favour with God and man.

Historical interpretation

Nine Centuries of Reception

9 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

9 quotes · AD 253–1107
Ante-NicenePost-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
30040050060070080090010001100

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

Ancient Greek Expositoras quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274SourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Metaphrastes.) Or again, Luke is here describing the time before the descent to Egypt, for before her purification Joseph had not taken Mary there. But before they went down into Egypt, they were not told by God to go to Nazareth, but as living more freely in their own country, thither of their own accord they went; for since the going up to Bethlehem was for no other reason but the taxing, when that was accomplished they go down to Nazareth.
d. AD 253Origen of Alexandriaas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Ante-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
But we must not wonder that they are called His parents, seeing the one from her childbirth, the other from his knowledge of it, deserved the names of father and mother.
d. AD 373Athanasius of Alexandriaas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(lib. de Incarn. Christi cont. Apollin.) But if as some say the flesh was changed into a Divine nature, how did it derive growth? for to attribute growth to an uncreated substance is impious.
d. AD 407John Chrysostomas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Orat. cont. Judæos.) At the feast of the Hebrews the law commanded men not only to observe the time, but the place, and so the Lord's parents wished to celebrate the feast of the Passover only at Jerusalem.
d. AD 430Augustine of Hippoas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(de Con. Evan. ii. 9.) Perhaps it may strike you as strange that Matthew should say that His parents went with the young Child into Galilee because they were unwilling to go to Judæa for fear of Archelaus, when they seem to have gone into Galilee rather because their city was Nazareth in Galilee, as Luke in this place explains it. But we must consider, that when the Angel, said in a dream to Joseph in Egypt, Rise, and take the young child and his mother, and go into the land of Israel, (Matt. 2:20.) it was at first understood by Joseph as a command to go into Judæa, for so at first sight the land of Israel might have been taken to mean. But when afterwards he finds that Herod's son Archelaus was king, he was unwilling to be exposed to that danger, seeing the land of Israel might also be understood to include Galilee also as a part of it, for there also the people of Israel dwelt.

(de Con. Ev. ii. 10.) But it may be asked, how did His parents go up all the years of Christ's childhood to Jerusalem, if they were prevented from going there by fear of Archelaus? This question might be easily answered, even had some one of the Evangelists mentioned how long Archelaus reigned. For it were possible that on the feast day amid so great a crowd they might secretly come, and soon return again, at the same time that they feared to remain there on other days, so as neither to be wanting in religious duties by neglecting the feast, nor leave themselves open to detection by a constant abode there. But now since all have been silent as to the length of Archelaus' reign, it is plain that when Luke says, They were accustomed to go up every year to Jerusalem, we are to understand that to have been when Archelaus was no longer feared.
d. AD 735Bedeas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Early MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
Luke has omitted in this place what he knew to have been sufficiently set forth by Matthew, that the Lord after this, for fear that He should be discovered and put to death by Herod, was carried by His parents into Egypt, and at Herod's death, having at length returned to Galilee, came to dwell in His own city Nazareth. For the Evangelists individually are wont to omit certain things which they either know to have been, or in the Spirit foresee will be, related by others, so that in the connected chain of their narrative, they seem as it were to have omitted nothing, whereas by examining the writings of another Evangelist, the careful reader may discover the places where the omissions have been. Thus after omitting many things, Luke says, And when they had accomplished all things, &c.

We must observe the distinction of words, that the Lord Jesus Christ in that He was a child, that is, had put on the condition of human weakness, was daily growing and being strengthened.

Wisdom truly, for in Him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily, (Col. 2:19.) but grace, because it was in great grace given to the man Christ Jesus, that from the time He began to be man He should be perfect man and perfect God. But much rather because He was the word of God, and God needed not to be strengthened, nor was in a state of growth. But while He was yet a little child He had the grace of God, that as in Him all things were wonderful, His childhood also might be wonderful, so as to be filled with the wisdom of God. It follows, And his parents went every year to Jerusalem, at the feast of the Passover.
d. AD 735BedeEarly MedievalSourceHomilies on the Gospels 1.19
The Lord’s coming every year to Jerusalem for the Passover with his parents is an indication of his human humility. It is characteristic of human beings to gather to offer God the votive offerings of spiritual sacrifices, and by plentiful prayers and tears to dispose their Maker toward them. Therefore the Lord, born a human being among human beings, did what God, by divine inspiration through his angels, prescribed for human beings to do. He himself kept the law which he gave in order to show us, who are human beings pure and simple, that whatever God orders is to be observed in everything. Let us follow the path of his human way of life. If we take delight in looking upon the glory of his divinity, if we want to dwell in his eternal home in heaven all the days of our lives, it delights us to see the Lord’s will and to be shielded by his holy temple. And lest we be forever buffeted by the wind of wickedness, let us remember to frequent the house, the church of the present time, with the requisite offerings of pure petitions.
d. AD 735BedeEarly MedievalSourceOn the Gospel of Luke
And his parents went every year to Jerusalem, at the feast of Passover. You see this evangelist, among the four creatures, not without reason compared to the calf, which, as if designated for sacrifices, revolves around the temple and Jerusalem with the course of his narrative. For indeed at the beginning he places a priest praying at the altar, establishes a multitude of people in the courts of the temple, soon sends Mary, having conceived the Lord, to Jerusalem, introduces her into the house of the High Priest. There he recounts the birth of the Baptist, and immediately after the birth, transfers the Lord with an offering. He leads him there every year with his parents, and at the age of twelve inserts him into the choir of doctors in the temple. Where among other things, he says astonishing things to the wise: Because it behooves me to be in the things of my Father (Luke 2). And after such things, he concludes his Gospel with the disciples praising God in the temple.
d. AD 1107Theophylact of Ohridas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
Bethlehem was indeed their city, their paternal city, Nazareth the place of their abode.

Now our Lord might have come forth from the womb in the stature of mature age, but this would seem like something imaginary; therefore His growth is gradual, as it follows, And the child grew, and waxed strong.

For if while yet a little child, He had displayed His wisdom, He would have seemed a miracle, but together with the advance of age He gradually showed Himself, so as to fill the whole world. For not as receiving wisdom is He said to be strengthened in spirit. For that which is most perfect in the beginning, how can that become any more perfect. Hence it follows, Filled with wisdom, and the grace of God was in him.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying Luke 2:41 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8